The subject matter described herein is in the general field of water quality measurement, specifically for monitoring chlorine and/or monochloramine levels by using new electrochemical sensor designs and methods.
Membrane-based amperometric sensors or probes (the terms sensor and probe are used interchangeably herein) for chlorine detection in water employ an electrode in close proximity to a gas diffusion membrane layer with an interposed region comprised of electrolyte, buffer, and/or redox mediator. Conventional designs typically consist of a flexible polymer membrane stretched across a fixed electrode. The membrane provides protection and analyte selectivity to the device and acts as a barrier to retain inner solution electrolyte, buffer and/or redox mediator(s). Electrochemical reactions occur at the electrode, which gives rise to a current response proportional to the analyte concentration.
The process of analyte transport/diffusion through the membrane, across the solution region, and to the electrode surface is mass transport dependent. Changes in the mass transport characteristics of any or all of these components impact the amperometric measurement of the analyte (i.e., current measurement). Changes in pressure and sample flow, physical impact or deformation of the membrane can cause a change in the spatial arrangement of the membrane-electrolyte-electrode dimensions, which can cause an erroneous change in the measurement of the analyte. This is a common issue for conventional membrane-based sensors and has been an impediment to expanding the application space, e.g., for in-pipe applications or other placements that experience pressure variations. Because of conventional sensor susceptibility to pressure fluctuations, sensors of this type are often utilized under isobaric conditions (i.e., atmospheric pressure). Osmotic pressure can also result in a change in the spatial arrangement of membrane-to-electrode, thereby changing the mass transport characteristic under which the sensor was calibrated, resulting in erroneous measurement of the analyte.
Additionally, the calibration stability and operational life of membrane-based amperometric probes can depend on the amount of electrolyte/reagent present in the interposed region between the electrode and membrane. Degradation, depletion, and/or loss of the inner fill solution may result in the need for frequent calibration and maintenance of the sensor.
In summary, one embodiment provides an amperometric sensor, comprising: a housing containing an inner till solution; an electrode bathed in the inner fill solution; and a membrane in intimate contact with the electrode; the electrode being formed as a non-compact or porous structure on the membrane.
Another embodiment provides an amperometric sensor, comprising: a housing containing an inner fill solution; an electrode bathed in the inner fill solution; an electrode contact disposed within the housing and coupled to the electrode; probe electronics coupled to the electrode contact; and a membrane in intimate contact with the electrode; the electrode being formed as a non-compact or porous structure on the membrane.
A further embodiment provides a method, comprising: forming an amperometric sensor having a non-compact or porous measuring electrode in intimate contact with a gas diffusion membrane; said non-compact or porous measuring electrode integrated with the gas diffusion membrane by a technique selected from the group consisting of printing, depositing, or adhering the non-compact or porous membrane with or to the gas diffusion membrane such that the two components move in unison and as a unified element in operation.
A further embodiment provides an amperometric sensor, comprising: a housing containing an inner fill solution; an electrode bathed in the inner fill solution; and a membrane separating the inner fill solution from an exterior environment; the electrode being formed as a non-compact or porous structure; whereby a spatial relationship of the electrode and the membrane is substantially constant.
The foregoing is a summary and thus may contain simplifications, generalizations, and omissions of detail; consequently, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the summary is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting.
For a better understanding of the embodiments, together with other and further features and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The scope of the invention will be pointed out in the appended claims.
It will be readily understood that the components of the embodiments, as generally described and illustrated in the figures herein, may be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations in addition to the described example embodiments. Thus, the following more detailed description of the example embodiments, as represented in the figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the embodiments, as claimed, but is merely representative of example embodiments.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” (or the like) means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” or the like in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are provided to give a thorough understanding of example embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that various embodiments can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, et cetera. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail. The following description is intended only by way of example, and simply illustrates certain example embodiments.
The embodiments described herein alleviate the above-described shortcomings of conventional membrane-based sensors and provide a membrane-based sensor with reduced sensitivity to changes in sample pressure and other forces that cause changes in the membrane-electrolyte-electrode spatial arrangement in conventional sensors. The various embodiments also decrease the need to maintain the probe, conventionally required due to electrolyte/reagent limitations in the current state of the art.
In an embodiment one or more electrode(s) for a membrane-based electrochemical sensor are constructed onto a gas diffusion membrane for use in determination of chlorine in water. A conductive electrode material can be printed, deposited, integrated, adhered to, or otherwise placed in intimate contact with a gas diffusion membrane such that the two components move in unison and as a unified element with enhanced robustness. Vapor deposition is a suitable mechanism of forming the electrode on the membrane, for example.
Referring to
In an embodiment, inner fill solution 403 may be stirred or otherwise agitated by agitating mechanism 409 to maintain homogenous solution and replenish inner fill solution 403 to electrode(s) 402. This can prolong the useful performance characteristics of the sensor by maintaining a uniform inner fill solution 403 to the electrode(s) 402. Internal buffer structures and/or the use of micro- and/or nanoelectrode structures will assist with minimizing influence of inner flow rate. Regeneration of the inner fill solution 403 components through electrochemical/chemical methods will also enable to enhance the longevity of the sensor.
In another embodiment, the stirred inner fill solution 403 may contain beads or particulates 408 which can move with the agitated inner fill solution 403 and contact the surface of the electrode(s) 402. These beads or particulates 408 assist in maintaining a clean surface on the electrode(s) 402 to avoid measurement errors cause by fouling or contamination of the electrode(s) 402.
As shown in
In an embodiment, the membrane-electrode can be supported along its membrane side by physical support structure 510a, which may be a compact or non-compact support structure. A support structure 510a is employed in an embodiment to reduce or eliminate movement of the membrane-electrode structure with the intent of prolonging the operational integrity of the membrane-electrode structure. A like arrangement to support the membrane can be employed on the electrode side of the membrane so as to improve the integrity of the membrane-electrode material during changes in sample pressure and flow as well as to protect from physical damage (abrasion, impacts, etc.). Such internal support (refer to
In
The support structure 510c may be insulated, as illustrated in
In an embodiment, interfering redox species can be blocked from passing the gas diffusion membrane by the incorporation of a guard electrode on the outer region of the membrane. A porous conductive electrode (e.g., grid, mesh, foam, array, porous plate, etc.) can be positioned on the outside (sample side) or formed on the outer portion of the gas diffusion membrane. This guard electrode is polarized at a potential which induces electrochemical reaction of the interfering species at/near the membrane, preventing the interfering species from passing through the membrane and into the electrolyte/electrode region. The products of the redox reaction of the interfering species may pass the membrane, but will no longer interfere with the measurement of the analyte. The potential of the guard electrode does not affect the analyte of interest, which can pass through the membrane and into the sensing region of the electrode. The non-compact guard electrode may also provide physical support for the membrane.
The membrane-electrode composition can be tuned to vary the mass transport characteristics of the analyte and interferant. The mass transport behavior of ionic versus neutral characteristic of the analyte species of interest will be different depending on the type of the membrane-electrode support. For example at pH 9 the chloramine species is in its neutral form NH2Cl whereas the free chlorine is predominantly in its ionic form OCT. This difference in the analyte characteristic wilt render in varying mass transport rates that can be registered as unique signatures for these analytes.
As shown in
In
As illustrated, e.g., 2(A-I), the electrode(s) can be positioned across the whole of the membrane or can be patterned as macro-, micro-, or nano-patterned structures. Single, multiples, continuous, or interlaced structures may comprise the electrode(s), as shown by way of example in
The conductive electrode(s) on the membrane are non-compact (e.g., metallic sponge). A non-compact form allows passage of analyte to the active region near the electrode(s) and in contact with the inner fill solution where sample conditioning occurs. The conductive electrode(s) may be in direct contact with the membrane or there may be other material(s) between the electrode(s) and the membrane, such as insulating layer or adhesion-assisting layer(s) (e.g., as illustrated in
In any embodiment, the region containing the inner fill solution may he microliters in volume or liters in volume. A large reservoir of inner fill solution can extend the life of the sensor and reduce time between necessary maintenance. In contrast, the inner fill solution in the electrode region in conventional sensors is quite small. A larger volume of inner fill solution may allow for reduced concentration of electrolyte/buffers/reagents in inner fill solution and thereby reduce some of the osmotic pressure which can occur in conventional type sensors and gives rise to measurement errors and/or sensor damage.
Embodiments described herein provide arrangements whereby the performance errors and changes caused by conditions which impact the electrode-membrane arrangement in a chlorine sensor are reduced or minimized by making the electrode an integral part of the membrane. The relationship of the electrode(s) to a membrane is a constant by the described method. Issues, such as pressure fluctuations, which can change the relationship of the membrane to the electrode, are mitigated by the described invention. Impact due to changes in the membrane-to-electrode arrangement by osmotic pressure is also mitigated. Consequently, the performance of the sensor will have greater long-term stability.
This disclosure has been presented fin purposes of illustration and description but is not intended to be exhaustive or limiting. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain principles and practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the disclosure for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Although illustrative embodiments have been described herein, it is to be understood that the embodiments are not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications y be affected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/056108 | 10/7/2016 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62239384 | Oct 2015 | US |