The field of the invention is that of making surface water drinkable.
More precisely, the invention relates to a method for making surface water (mainly river or lake water) drinkable by filtration thereof by means of membranes.
Numerous methods for treating surface water with a view to making it drinkable are known from the prior art. The operation of making water drinkable consists in lowering the suspended matter content, turbidity, organic matter content including colour, and the micropollutant content, of the surface water.
Thus, physicochemical methods are known using chemical products for aggregating the organic matter to facilitate elimination thereof by settling. These chemical products, referred to as coagulants or flocculants, constitute consumables which, apart from the cost thereof, have the drawback of not being neutral for the environment. These chemical methods provide efficiency of elimination of the organic matter that rarely exceeds 70% despite the high doses of product injected. They are accompanied by a significant production of sludge. Moreover, they require adjusting the pH and remineralising the water because of their operating conditions in an acidic environment (pH 5.5 to 6). In addition, these methods do not treat the micropollutants.
Other methods consist in putting the water to be made drinkable in contact with a material, such as mainly activated carbon, adsorbing the organic matter, in particular the micropollutants, that it contains.
These methods do however require the use of high concentrations of adsorbent products, which makes them expensive methods. Activated carbon has a porous structure making it possible to retain a wide range of contaminants. However, the presence of a high concentration of organic matter tends to quickly saturate the macropores and some of the mesopores of the activated carbon. Even if the micropollutants continue to be adsorbed on the medium, the activated-carbon reactor then requires higher doses in order to treat the organic matter and produce water with a quality conforming to the standards. In addition, these methods involving activated carbon are not adapted for treating water having strong colouring, related to a high concentration of humic substances, since to do this they would give rise to prohibitive operating costs.
Membrane filtration methods are normally used in the context of producing drinkable water. The membranes that they use have a porous structure that enables them to retain not only matter in suspension but also dissolved matter. Thus microfiltration membranes have pores of 0.1 μm to 10 μm, ultrafiltration membranes have pores of 10 nm to 0.1 μm, nanofiltration membranes have pores of a few nanometres and reverse osmosis membranes have an even denser structure. Reverse osmosis membranes thus make it possible to retain almost all the solutes. They are widely used for producing drinkable water from sea water or brackish water.
However, these nanofiltration or reverse osmosis membrane filtration methods lead to water losses of between 15% and 30% and therefore to concentrates that cannot be discharged into the natural environment before specific treatment. In addition, the filtered water obtained by nanofiltration or reverse osmosis membranes must undergo remineralisation since passing through the membranes also eliminates bivalent ions (nanofiltration) and monovalent ions (reverse osmosis).
Moreover, nanofiltration or reverse osmosis membranes used for making water drinkable have the drawback of becoming clogged up over time and requiring the use of chemical products, referred to as anti-scaling or sequestering agents, for delaying this process. These sequestering products may be harmful for the environment.
It should also be noted that, in some regions, the surface water to be made drinkable has a more accentuated colouring than previously. This colouring, which is related to the presence of humic substances in this water, results from the degradation of the plants located in the area where the surface water is captured. Global warming would appear to be one of the causes of the accentuation of the colouring of this water. To this intensification of the colour of surface water, the current response is increasing the doses of chemical products used for reducing the organic matter content thereof, consequently causing an increase in the production of sludge.
On the drinking-water market, there is an increasing need for methods not using or making only little use of chemical products. This is because these products may have a harmful effect for the environment during use thereof and/or during manufacture or transport thereof. They are therefore more and more unacceptable to the consumer.
One objective of the present invention is to propose a method for making surface water drinkable by membrane method making it possible to dispense with the use of any sequestering product.
One objective of the present invention is also to disclose such a method for making water drinkable not requiring any remineralisation of the treated water.
Another objective of the present invention is to disclose such a method for making water drinkable that, in at least some of the embodiments thereof, makes it possible also to dispense with the use of any coagulant or any flocculant.
Yet another objective of the invention is proposing such a method that leads to the production of little or no sludge.
Finally, another objective of the present invention is to propose such a method making it possible to operate the membrane systems with hydraulic efficiencies greater than those that can be obtained with the methods of the prior art.
These objectives, as well as others that will emerge hereinafter, are achieved by means of the invention, which relates to a method for making surface water drinkable aimed at reducing the suspended matter content thereof, the turbidity thereof, the organic matter content thereof and the colour thereof, characterised in that it comprises:
These screening and ultrafiltration or microfiltration steps combined with the nanofiltration make it possible in fact to reduce the suspended matter and colloidal particle content of the water and the organic matter content and in particular the colour of the water, so as to meet the current standards without having previously to add to the water coagulant and/or flocculant products to form flocs and then settling it in a settler.
When the water to be treated has micropollutants, the method according to the invention advantageously comprises a supplementary step of adsorption on activated carbon, said step allowing a reduction in the micropollutant content of said water. The present invention thus makes it possible to reduce the residual organic matter content at the entry to the step of adsorption on activated carbon. The dosings of activated carbon are thus minimised while ensuring elimination of the residual organic matter and of the micropollutants.
Preferentially, all or part of the concentrate resulting from said nanofiltration step is conveyed to said step of adsorption on activated carbon. When the method is implemented with a two-stage nanofiltration, the concentrate conveyed to the step of adsorption on active carbon can come from these two stages. This makes it possible to increase the overall hydraulic efficiency of the method. This is because nanofiltration produces a concentrate containing organic matter that is a liquid waste. The recovery of a part of this concentrated liquid and the activated carbon treatment thereof therefore makes it possible to reduce the water losses and ultimately to increase the total efficiency of the plant.
According to a variant, the supplementary adsorption step is implemented in the presence of ozone. The ozone, intended to degrade the micropollutants adsorbed on the activated carbon, will thus be able to be injected directly into the reactor accommodating the activated carbon or, according to an alternative, in a concentrate conveyed to said reactor.
According to a variant of the invention, the nanofiltration membranes used are polyether sulfone membranes. This material is compatible with the use of high levels of free chlorine of between 200 ppm and 1000 ppm, limiting the risk of biofouling that is often present because of the high proportion of natural organic matter in the water to be treated.
Preferentially, said nanofiltration step is implemented without any recirculation of concentrate at the membrane head. In this case, the nanofiltration membranes used preferentially have a salt retention rate of less than 15%, i.e. they do not retain more than 15% of the salt concentration of the liquid that they filter.
In this regard, it should be noted that, in the methods for making water drinkable of the prior art implementing membrane filtration by nanofiltration and/or reverse osmosis, it is conventional to reroute part of the concentrate produced at the membrane head with a view to increasing the conversion rate of said membranes. The main purpose of such recirculation is to discharge the salts retained by the surface of the membranes in order to avoid the accumulation of these salts on the surface thereof. This is because a high concentration of such salts on the surface of the membranes may cause precipitation thereof and greatly impair the filtration performance of said membranes. In addition, when the method is stopped, the presence on the one hand of the membranes with a permeate having a low salt concentration and on the other hand a highly-concentrated limit layer of salts subjects the membranes to an osmotic pressure that may exceed the mechanical strength thereof and thus cause rupture thereof.
By using membranes that retain salts only a little, in practice not retaining more than 15% of the salts, it is possible, in the context of the present invention, to dispense with such recirculation of concentrate at the membrane head. Such an absence of recirculation affords significant advantages. Firstly, it affords a saving in the energy necessary for recirculation, and thus gives rise to a reduction in the energy consumption of the method that may range up to 25%. Secondly, it allows a reduction in the membrane surface necessary for producing the same quantity of water. Without recirculation the water in fact does not need to be refiltered. Thus this absence of recirculation of the concentrate makes it possible to reduce both the cost of constructing the plant and the costs of using this and the operating costs.
In the context of the present invention, nanofiltration membranes that retain the salts only a little will therefore preferentially be selected. Nanofiltration membranes, in particular those made from polyether sulfones, when sold, generally indicate a high salt retention level. The inventors therefore had to implement numerous tests before finding membranes suitable for this preferential variant of the invention, having a salt retention level below 15%.
The invention, as well as the various advantages that it presents, will be understood more easily by means of the following description of embodiments thereof given by way of illustration and non-limitatively, with reference to the drawings, wherein:
With reference to
The total hydraulic efficiency of such a membrane system is greater than 90%. The screening and microfiltration or ultrafiltration afford a pretreatment of the water with a view to eliminating therefrom the particulate or colloidal pollution. These steps thus make it possible to dispense with the use of any coagulant or flocculant and of any settling or filtration on granular material (sand, anthracite or pumice stone conventionally used) of the water upstream of the nanofiltration step. As for the nanofiltration, this affords a reduction in dissolved compounds such as dissolved organic matter, and in particular those responsible for the colour of the water.
With reference to
According to
According to
This plant implements a first microfiltration step (M) followed by an ultrafiltration step (U) followed by a nanofiltration step.
The microfiltration membranes have a cut-off threshold of 0.5 μm. As for the ultrafiltration membranes, these have a cut-off threshold of 0.02 μm.
The nanofiltration step comprises two stages (NF 1, NF 2) mounted in series. Each filtration stage is equipped with three nanofiltration membranes each having a membrane surface of 37 m2. The plant thus develops a total nanofiltration surface of 222 m2.
In this plant, the water, after a safety filtration during the microfiltration step (M), and after having been ultrafiltered during the ultrafiltration step (U), is conveyed to the first nanofiltration stage (NF1) at a conversion rate of 50%, which means that 100% of the volume of the water to be treated makes it possible to obtain 50% permeate volume and 50% concentrate volume. The concentrate produced by this first filtration stage (NF1) is conveyed in its entirety to the second filtration stage (NF2) in order to be filtered therein at a conversion rate of 90%, which means that 100% of the concentrate volume of the first filtration stage makes it possible to obtain 90% permeate volume and 10% concentrate volume. The concentrate produced by the second filtration stage is discharged through a pipe to the natural environment.
The permeates coming from the first and second nanofiltration stages are mixed.
Finally, the conversion rate of the nanofiltration step is 95%, which means that 100% of the volume of the water to be treated entering this step makes it possible to obtain 95% by volume permeate and 5% by volume concentrate.
In these four embodiments, the nanofiltration membranes used are sulfonated polyether sulfone membranes sold by the company Hydranautics under the name HydraCoreRe 50 LD. These membranes have a cut-off capacity of 1000 Da.
This cut-off threshold of 1000 Da is in fact sufficiently fine for treating the organic matter and the colour of the water but sufficiently high not to change the mineralisation of the water, eliminating the need for remineralising the water following the treatment. The nanofiltration membrane used allows ions to pass, which helps to reduce the supply pressure and thereby to reduce the energy consumption. In conventional nanofiltration, the supply pressure is 10 bar (NF 90 at a temperature of 15° C. and conversion rate of 85% with three filtration stages), which gives rise to an energy consumption of 365 W·h/m3 of treated water. With the open nanofiltration membrane used in the context of the present invention having a cut-off threshold of 1000 Da, the supply pressure is only 5 bar (at a temperature of 15° C. and a conversion rate of 95%).
The energy consumption is thus reduced to 150 W·h/m3 of treated water. Table 1 below indicates the reductions in the colour, turbidity and dissolved organic matter parameters obtained by means of the overall treatment system shown in
Table 2 below presents the quality parameters of the water before and after treatment by nanofiltration followed by the activated-carbon reactor according to the invention by means of the plant shown in
These results demonstrate the efficacy of the treatment according to the invention for reducing the organic matter and the colour. The organic matter content is reduced by more than 65%. The colour content is reduced by more than 90%. The reduction in the water losses while maintaining a quality of water produced in accordance with the standards is thus noted. The water losses can be less than 1% if the COD concentration is for example less than 4 mg/I at the nanofiltration input, which makes it possible to recycle the major part of the concentrate.
The plant shown in
To monitor the development of the clogging of the nanofiltration membranes, the permeability thereof was measured continuously. In this context, the permeability of the membranes was calculated by dividing the flow corrected to 20° C. (expressed in L/h·m2) by the transmembrane pressure necessary for filtration.
The results as set out in
During the test period, i.e. 3 months, the conductivity of the water to be treated and of the nanofiltered water was measured and the rate of retention of the salts contained in this water by the nanofiltration membranes was calculated. The results of these measurements are set out in
Also, the alkalinity levels of the water to be treated and of the nanofiltered water were regularly measured five times over the entire test period and the rate of retention of alkalinity in this water by the filtration membranes was calculated. The results of these measurements are set out on
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
FR1906187 | Jun 2019 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/066193 | 6/11/2020 | WO |