These and other objects and features of this invention will be better understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings wherein:
As used herein, the term “selective” when used in reference to membranes describes the propensity of the membrane to permit the transfer through the membrane of one component of a mixture to which the membrane is exposed relative to other components of the mixture. Thus, a CO2-selective membrane is one which preferentially permits the transfer of CO2 through the membrane relative to the transfer of other components, e.g. H2S and H2, of the mixture.
As used herein, the terms “membrane” and “membrane section” are used interchangeably and, thus, unless otherwise stated, statements made with respect to “membranes” are equally applicable to “membrane sections”.
The crux of the invention disclosed and claimed herein is the use of gas permeation membranes or membrane sections to separate H2S, CO2, and H2 individually along with the water-gas-shift reaction within a single membrane module. The three membranes or membrane sections are arranged in such a way that the feed (the gaseous fluid mixture) and the retentate (that portion of the gaseous fluid mixture remaining after the separation or removal of one of the components of interest by the respective selective membrane) contact the feed sides of the three membranes or membrane sections in series while the individual permeates, H2S, CO2, and H2, are obtained separately. In addition to being selective to H2S, CO2, and H2, respectively, the three membranes or membrane sections are able to operate at substantially the same temperature and pressure, thereby allowing them to be housed in a single reactor vessel in accordance with one embodiment of this invention, reducing the floor plan and simplifying the overall operation compared to conventional systems performing the same separations.
Each of the three membranes or membrane sections is comprised of a material which renders the membrane or membrane section selective for the removal of one of H2S, CO2 and H2. The membranes are arranged such that the first of the components removed from the gaseous fluid mixture is H2S, the second of the components is CO2, and the third of the components is H2.
Membranes suitable for use in the method and system of this invention, in addition to being H2S—, CO2— and H2-selective, must also be capable of operating under the conditions, i.e. temperature and pressure, at which the gaseous fluid mixture is introduced into the system. For synthesis gas produced in a gasification process, the operational temperatures are in the range of about 600° C. to about 1000° C. For gaseous fluid mixtures derived from a fuel reforming process, the operational temperatures are typically in the range of about 500° C. to about 900° C. The operational pressures are in the range of about 10 to about 100 atm., preferably in the range of about 20 to about 60 atm.
Membranes suitable for use in the separation of H2S from the gaseous fluid mixture in accordance with one embodiment of this invention are nonporous (dense) membranes comprising at least one metal oxide. For gaseous fluid streams having temperatures in the range of about 600° C. to about 1000° C., the preferred metal oxides are calcium-based, such as CaO. In accordance with another embodiment of this invention, the membrane comprises CaS. For temperatures in the range of about 300° C. to about 600° C., the preferred metal oxides are zinc-based, such as ZnO.
For CO2 separation, the preferred membrane comprises at least one of a dense metal carbonate and a dense metal oxide wherein the metal is selected from the group consisting of Ca, Mg, Ba, Sr, Cd, Mn, Fe, Zn, Co, Ni, and combinations thereof. In accordance with one particularly preferred embodiment of this invention, the at least one dense metal carbonate is selected from the group consisting of CaCO3, MgCO3, Ca—Mg(CO3)2 and combinations thereof. Of the gaseous components remaining in the gaseous fluid mixture following removal of H2S therefrom, the dense carbonate membranes allow only CO2 in the form of carbonate ions to diffuse through and exclude all other gas species present in the gaseous mixture, including hydrogen. Thus, the method of this invention can achieve 100% selectivity for CO2 on the permeate side of the membranes. The membranes can operate at higher temperatures (greater than 200° C.) than conventional membranes to enable higher diffusion flux for the carbonate (CO32−) ions. Thus, the membranes of this invention are suitable for use in applications for CO2 separation from fuel/flue gas or synthesis gas at higher temperatures without the need of gas cooling. They can be used as a membrane reactor with the water-gas-shift reaction to increase hydrogen production by removing the equilibrium limitation. The catalysts of the water-gas-shift reaction may be eliminated if the membrane reactor is operated at sufficiently high temperatures (greater than about 500° C.).
For hydrogen separation, ceramic materials of the perovskite type are known to have virtually infinite selectivity to hydrogen in the temperature range of about 600° C. to about 1000° C. and, thus, are well suited for the third membrane section of the system in accordance with one embodiment of this invention. When operating at above about 600° C., the water gas shift reaction can take place without the need for catalysts in accordance with the following equation:
CO+H2O═CO2+H2+41 KJ/mole (1)
As indicated by Equation (1) herein above, the water-gas-shift reaction is exothermic. Thus, equilibrium CO conversion is higher at lower operating temperatures, e.g. 200° C. to 300° C. While both CO2 and H2 are removed from the syngas by the two complementary membrane sections of this invention, the water-gas-shift reaction is more favorable for the production of H2 and CO2. Thus, the conversion of CO can be increased without being limited by its reaction equilibrium, even at temperatures between about 600° C. to about 1000° C. If necessary, catalysts can be added to the inside of the membrane module to promote further the steam-methane reforming reaction of CH4 to H2 in accordance with the following equation:
CH4+2H2O═CO2+4H2−200 KJ/mole (2)
For temperatures in the range of about 300° C. to about 600° C., magnesium-based metal carbonates or oxide dense membranes are particularly suitable for CO2 separation. Palladium or its alloy materials, which have infinite selectivity to hydrogen, can be used for the third membrane section of the process and system of this invention for the separation of H2. For operating temperatures less than about 600° C., catalysts may be needed to facilitate the water-gas-shift reaction.
An Illinois #6 coal is gasified in a gasifier at a rate of about 100,000 lbs/hr, operating at a temperature of about 1000° C. and a pressure of about 30 atm. Steam is provided to the gasifier at a steam/carbon mole ratio of about 0.66 and oxygen is provided to the gasifier at a rate so as to provide an oxygen/carbon mole ratio of about 0.42. Based on the assumptions of thermodynamic equilibrium for all chemical reactions in the system, calculations were performed for four different process schemes: (A) the conventional process without the use of any membrane unit as shown in
The pressures of the feed side of the membrane sections are at about 30 atm. For the hydrogen-selective membranes, the pressure of the permeate side is maintained at about 1 atm. Therefore, to maintain a positive pressure gradient across the membrane, the non-permeate synthesis gas stream exiting the H2 membrane has a H2 partial pressure of about 1 atm. For the CO2-selective membranes, the partial pressure of the CO2 at the permeate side needs to be below about 0.1 atm to ensure calcination of the CaCO3 on the permeate side according to the CO2 equilibrium pressure for the carbonation reaction. The non-permeate synthesis gas stream exiting from the CO2 membrane will have a partial pressure of about 0.3 atm for CO2 to prevent calcination of the membrane material. Additional steam is added to the water-gas-shift reactor for the membrane shift reactors at a steam/carbon mole ratio of 0.4. The hydrogen recovery for the PSA unit in the conventional coal to H2 process is assumed to be 80%.
The raw synthesis gas generated from gasification of the Illinois #6 coal also contains about 0.8% by weight of H2S. The use of a CaO membrane with a complementary membrane reactor as in process B also reduces the H2S down to about a 100 ppm level according to a thermodynamic equilibrium calculation.
The following table compares the results for the above four processes in terms of the number of moles for the hydrogen and carbon dioxide products. Also shown in the table are the amounts and the compositions of the gas that need downstream gas cleanup or further gas conditioning. The numbers in the table are all normalized to the hydrogen product for the process A.
As can be seen, the conventional process (A) needs to handle the largest amount of gas in the downstream separation units. Process B, which uses the complementary membrane reactor process of this invention, can produce the highest amount of H2 product with an additional pure CO2 byproduct ready for sequestration. After both H2 and CO2 have been separated from the raw synthesis gas stream, only about 15% of the gas volume remaining requires further conditioning, such as for removal of trace amounts of sulfur or other heavy metals. Use of the CO2 membrane reactor without the complementary use of the H2 membrane, as in Process C, results in pure CO2 product and a H2 enriched stream that requires further purification. If 90% of the H2 can be recovered from this purification process, the total H2 product is about 12% higher than the conventional coal to H2 process. On the other hand, the use of the H2 membrane reactor without the complementary use of the CO2 membrane, as in Process D, results in a pure H2 product that is about 10% lower in quantity than the complementary membrane reactor process of this invention. The advantage of the process and system of this invention can clearly be seen from its high hydrogen production rate and the low residual gas flow that needs further conditioning.
While in the foregoing specification this invention has been described in relation to certain preferred embodiments thereof, and many details have been set forth for the purpose of illustration, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is susceptible to additional embodiments and that certain of the details described herein can be varied considerably without departing from the basic principles of this invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11406695 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 11511057 | US |