Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6776470
-
Patent Number
6,776,470
-
Date Filed
Wednesday, July 31, 200221 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, August 17, 200419 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Meier; Stephen D.
- Dudding; Alfred
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 347 19
- 347 14
- 347 12
- 347 7
-
International Classifications
- B41J29393
- B41J2938
- B41J2195
-
Abstract
The present invention contemplates providing apparatus and methods for recommending to a consumer an optimal replacement consumable size, based on a record of the consumer's past utilization rate and on recommended intervention rate information stored in a memory device on the consumable.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to printer consumables and, more particularly, to an information storage device on a printer consumable, and to methods of utilizing the stored information in the device.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Inkjet printing systems are well known in the art. One type of inkjet printing system uses a printhead mounted to a carriage that is moved back and forth over print media, such as paper. As the printhead passes over appropriate locations on the print media, a control system activates the printhead to eject ink drops onto the print media and form desired images and characters. To work properly, such printing systems must have a reliable supply of ink for the printhead.
This ink may be supplied from an ink container that is mounted to and moves with the printer carriage. In some inkjet printers, the ink supply is replaceable separately from the printhead. In others, the printhead and ink supply together form an integral unit that is replaced as a unit once the ink is depleted.
In another type of inkjet printing system, referred to as “off-axis”, the ink supply is not carried on the print carriage with the printhead, but is stationary and remotely located from the printhead. Typically the printhead is fluidically coupled to a replaceable ink supply or container via a conduit such as a flexible tube, allowing the printhead to be continuously replenished during a printing operation. Alternatively, the printhead may be provided with ink intermittently, traveling to a stationary reservoir for periodic replenishment.
Regardless of the type of inkjet printing system, periodic replacement of the ink supply is required. When the supply is replaced, it is useful to supply the printer software driver with information about the new ink supply. To that end, the supply may have an integral information storage device, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,699,091, “Replaceable part with integral memory for usage, calibration and other data.” When installed into the printing system, electrical communication between the printing system and the memory device is established. This electrical connection allows for the exchange of information between the printing system electronics and the memory device.
The memory device typically stores information that is utilized by the printing system electronics to ensure compatibility and print quality. The memory device may include “read only” portions that are programmed at the time of manufacture; “right once” portions that are permanently altered when written to by the printing system, and non-volatile alterable portions that may be repeatedly modified by the printing system.
Typically, inkjet printing systems have used ink supplies having a fixed, standardized volume of ink. Printing system users, however, have widely-varying patterns of ink usage. Depending on a user's printing behavior, some users deplete a supply quickly and therefore need to replace supplies often; other users deplete a supply slowly, such that the ink in a supply “expires” before it can be fully utilized.
To accommodate the various patterns of ink usage, a printing system may be configured to accept multiple sizes of ink supplies. Replacement ink supplies may then be made available to users in a variety of sizes, such that a user may tailor the supply size to their printing needs. Providing a variety of replacement ink supply sizes, however, can confuse the printing system user, since it may not be apparent to the user which of the available replacement sizes is optimal for their needs.
Thus there is a need for apparatus and methods which assist a printer user in selecting an appropriate replacement ink supply.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Embodiments of the present invention provide apparatus and methods for recommending to a consumer an optimal replacement consumable size, based on a record of the consumer's past utilization rate and on recommended intervention rate information stored in a memory device on the consumable.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1A and 1B
depict in schematic form an exemplary inkjet printing system that includes replaceable ink container having a memory thereon for transferring information from the ink container to a printer controller.
FIG. 2
is a block diagram further depicting the exemplary inkjet printing system of
FIGS. 1A and 1B
.
FIG. 3
,
FIGS. 3A
,
3
B,
3
C illustrate exemplary embodiments of replacement ink containers having different internal volumes but a common printer interface; each of the embodiments is shown in both front view and side view.
FIG. 4
is a logic flow diagram providing an overview of an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5
is a logic flow diagram further illustrating how a recommended replacement size may be determined in an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
FIGS. 1A and 1B
illustrate an exemplary inkjet printing system
10
which may incorporate the present invention. The inkjet printing system
10
includes an ink container or cartridge
12
and a printer portion
14
. The ink container has a connection portion
13
for mating with the printer. The printer portion
14
includes an ink container receiving station or a receptacle
16
, a printhead
18
and a controller
20
. With the ink container
12
properly inserted into the ink container receiving station
16
, an electrical and a fluidic coupling is established between the ink container
12
and the printer portion
14
. The fluidic coupling allows ink stored within the ink container
12
to be provided to the printhead
18
. The electrical coupling allows information to be passed between the ink container
12
and the printer portion
14
to ensure the operation of printer portion
14
is compatible with the ink contained in the ink cartridge
12
to achieve optimal print quality.
In addition to transferring information between the printer portion
14
and the ink container
12
, the controller
20
controls the relative movement of the printhead
18
and the print media (not shown). The controller
20
also selectively activates the printhead
18
to deposit ink on the print media. By selectively activating the printhead
18
, as the printhead
18
and print media are moved relative to each other, images and text are formed on print media.
The ink container
12
includes a reservoir
22
for storing ink. A fluid outlet
24
is provided that is in fluid communication with the fluid reservoir
22
. The fluid outlet
24
is configured for connection to a complimentary fluid inlet
26
associated with the ink container receiving station
16
. A fluid conduit
28
is connected between the fluid inlet
26
and the printhead
18
. This fluid conduit
28
may be a continuous fluid conduit in the case of a flexible conduit or an intermittent fluid conduit in the case where the printhead is positioned at a refilling station for replenishing ink. In either case, with the ink container
12
properly inserted into the ink container receiving station
16
, fluid communication is established between the ink container
12
and the printhead
18
.
The ink container
12
also includes an information storage device or memory
30
for storing information related to the ink container
12
. A plurality of electrical contacts
32
are provided that are each electrically connected to the electrical storage device
30
. With the ink container
12
properly inserted into the ink container receiving station
16
, each of the plurality of electrical contacts
32
engage each of a plurality of electrical contacts
34
associated with the ink container receiving station
16
. Each of the plurality of electrical contacts
34
is electrically connected to the controller
20
by a plurality of electrical conductors. With proper insertion of the ink container
12
into the ink container receiving station
16
, the memory
30
associated with the ink container
12
is electrically connected to the controller
20
allowing information to be transferred between the ink container
12
and the printer portion
14
.
The memory
30
associated with the ink container
12
is shown having 4 electrical contacts or terminals
34
, although the number of terminals can be even fewer than four. It is generally preferred that the number of electrical contacts
32
be kept relatively small in order to increase the reliability of the connection between the ink container
12
and the printer portion
14
.
The memory device may alternatively have a wireless communications interface (not shown), as, for example, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,312,106 “Method And Apparatus For Transferring Information Between A Replaceable Consumable And A Printing Device.” The memory device may contain pre-programmed “read only” data, “right once” fields, and alterable non-volatile memory.
FIG. 2
is a generalized block diagram representing an exemplary inkjet printing system
10
shown connected to an information source or host computer
40
. The host computer
40
may be a conventional computer including a display device
50
, such as a workstation, server or personal computer, to name a few, that provides image information to the controller
20
by way of a link
42
. The link
42
is a typically a conventional printer interface such as an electrical link or an infrared link for allowing information transfer between the host computer
40
and the printing system
10
.
The controller
20
controls a printer mechanism
44
and the printhead
18
to selectively eject ink droplets as the printhead and print media are moved relative to each other. Various parameters for controlling operation of the printing system
10
are provided by the host computer
40
or are provided by the memory
30
associated with the ink supply
12
. Printer parameter information provided by the host computer
40
is typically resident in printer control software that is typically referred to as the “printer driver”.
Among the parameters stored in the memory
30
on ink container
12
may be the following: actual count of ink drops emitted from the printhead
18
; date code of the ink supply; date code of initial insertion of the ink container
12
; system coefficients; ink type/color; ink container size; print mode; temperature data and heater resistor parameters; age of the ink container; drop count for the printhead
18
; a pumping algorithm for the case where the ink container
12
is pressurized for higher ink flow rates between the ink container
12
and printer portion
14
; printer serial number; cartridge usage information; to name a few.
Upon insertion of the ink container
12
into the printer portion
14
the controller
20
reads the parameter information from the memory
30
for controlling various printing functions within the printing system
10
. For example, the controller
20
may compute an estimate of remaining ink in the ink container
12
and compare the estimate against prerecorded supply thresholds, and inhibit printing if the estimate of remaining ink is below a threshold to prevent dry firing of the printhead which can result in a damage to the printhead
18
.
Another example of how parameter information stored in the memory
30
can be used by the controller
20
is to verify that proper ink type and color is installed properly in the printing system
10
. In addition, the controller
20
can provide a notice to the user when the ink within the ink container
12
is beyond its shelf-life so that the ink container
12
can be replaced ensuring maximum print quality.
The ink in an ink supply has a useable life based on the ink chemistry and other factors, such as the water vapor transmission rate (WTVR) through components of the supply. Inks formulated for different applications, or inks stored in different containers, may have different useable lives. For example, ink for applications requiring a high degree of color fidelity may have a shorter useable life than inks for general business or personal use. An ink supply may also have an expiration date or an “install before” date, based on the limited shelf-life of the supply.
To accommodate the differing usage rates by consumers, replacement ink supplies may be provided in a variety of sizes or ink capacities.
FIGS. 3A
,
3
B, and
3
C illustrate embodiments of multiple sizes of ink containers
12
a
,
12
b
,
12
c
all having interconnect portions
13
a
,
13
b
,
13
c
adapted to connect with a common ink container receiving station. Each of the containers
12
a
,
12
b
,
12
c
are shown in front view and side view. In the exemplary embodiments illustrated, the ink container of
FIG. 3A
includes a 3 ml supply of ink; the ink container of
FIG. 3B
includes a 10 ml supply of ink; and the ink container of
FIG. 3C
includes a 15 ml supply of ink. Containers with different ink volumes than those illustrated may of course also be provided. The multiple size containers having a common interconnect portion allow the consumer to tailor their container purchases to their individual ink usage pattern. For example, a consumer who does relatively little color printing may purchase 3 ml color ink supplies; a consumer who does extensive color printing may purchase 15 ml color ink supplies.
FIG. 4
is an overview of an exemplary embodiment of the method of the present invention. The present invention contemplates providing apparatus and methods for recommending to a consumer an optimal replacement consumable size, based on a record of the consumer's past utilization rate and on recommended intervention rate information stored in a memory device on the consumable. The method generally depicted in
FIG. 4
may be performed by printer control software resident in a host computer; the actual software or firmware implementing the invention may be differently structured than depicted in
FIG. 4
while performing essentially the same functions.
As shown in
FIG. 4
, the exemplary process begins
102
when the currently installed supply becomes depleted or expired
104
. A depleted supply may be determined by an “out of ink” (OOI) sensor, as is known in the art. An expired supply may be detected by the printer control software comparing an expiration date stored on the supply memory device with the current date from the computer's real time clock.
If the supply is depleted or expired, the printer control software then determines the time since the supply was initially installed in the printer
106
. In an exemplary embodiment, the memory device on the supply may include a data field indicating the “First Insertion Date” of the consumable, which is written by the printer control software when the supply is initially installed in the printer. The printer control software may then determine the time since initial installation by subtracting the value in the “First Insertion Date” data field from the present value of the host computer's real time clock.
Once the printer control software has determined the time since the consumable was installed, it then gets the target intervention rate information from the memory device on the consumable
108
. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the target intervention rate may be coded as a binary value representing the recommended number of interventions per year (IPY), as indicated in Table 1. In the exemplary embodiment shown in Table 1, a two bit binary value is used to indicated recommended intervention rates of from twice per year (binary value “00”) to six times per year (binary value “11”). The information may also be stored other formats, or equivalent information, such as a recommended replacement interval, may be stored.
TABLE 1
|
|
Binary ROM
Interventions
|
Value
Per Year (IPY)
Printer Behavior
|
|
00
2
Based on expired cartridge use time,
|
01
3
recommend a replacement cartridge that
|
10
4
will produce the interventions per year
|
11
6
stored in this memory field.
|
|
Based on the duration of time it took the consumer to deplete the currently installed supply and on the “recommended intervention rate” retrieved from the memory device on the currently installed supply, the printer control software determines a recommended replacement supply size
110
. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a recommended replacement size is determined by calculating from the “interventions per year” a “recommended use time” in months; comparing the “recommended use time” to time since the supply was initially installed; and looking up a recommended replacement in a table, as discussed further with respect to
FIG. 5
, below.
In the exemplary embodiment, the printer control software then informs the consumer or operator of the printer of the recommended replacement supply size
112
, and the process ends
114
. The notification may be in the form of a message displayed on the display device of the host computer, or in other forms known in the art.
A more detailed example of how the printer control software may determine a recommended replacement supply size is provided in Table 2 and FIG.
5
.
TABLE 2
|
|
Expired
Expired Use Time,
Recommended Replacement
|
Cartridge Size
Months*
Cartridge Size
|
|
3 ml
<(12/IPY) − 1
10 ml
|
>(12/IPY) + 1
3 ml
|
else
3 ml
|
10 ml
<(12/IPY) − 1
15 ml
|
>(12/IPY) + 1
3 ml
|
else
10 ml
|
15 m1
<(12/IPY) − 1
10 ml
|
>(12/IPY) + 1
15 ml
|
else
15 ml
|
|
*IPY = recommended interventions per year
|
The following example illustrates the exemplary embodiment of Table 2. Assume that the consumer currently has a 10 ml ink supply installed, and that the recommended “interventions per year” for the supply is four (encoded in Table 1 as “10”), meaning that optimal printing results are obtained when the ink in the supply is completely utilized within approximately three months. If the consumer uses up the ink in the supply in less than two months [(12/4)−1=2], then the printer driver software, upon detecting that the supply is empty, recommends to the consumer that the empty 10 ml container be replaced with a larger 15 ml container. If instead the consumer uses up the ink in more than four months [(12/4)+1=4], then the printer driver software, upon detecting that the container is empty, recommends to the consumer that the empty 10 ml container be replaced with a smaller 3 ml container. Finally, if the consumer uses up the ink in the container within the optimal period of two to four months [“else”], the printer driver software recommends replacing the empty container with a new container of the same size.
If the consumer is already utilizing the largest or smallest available supply size, the above-described exemplary procedure is accordingly modified as indicated in the “3 ml” and “15 ml” rows of Table 2. While recommending a smaller replacement supply serves to insure that the ink is utilized within an optimal time period, recommending purchase of a larger supply is for the convenience of the consumer, in that the frequency of replacement is reduced.
FIG. 5
further illustrates in flowchart form how a recommended replacement size may be determined in the exemplary embodiment of the invention. At the beginning
202
of the process, the printer control software determines
204
if the supply was depleted too quickly. The total time it took the consumer to deplete the supply, “T” is compared to a value, (12/IPY)−1, derived from the recommended intervention rate, as discussed with respect to Table 2, above. If “yes”, and if a larger size supply is available
206
, the consumer is advised
208
to replace the depleted supply with a larger size. If a larger size is not available, the consumer is advised
228
to replace the depleted supply with the same size supply, and the procedure ends
232
.
If the time it took the consumer to deplete the supply is not less then the value derived from the recommended intervention rate, the procedure then determines
214
if the supply was depleted too slowly. “T” is compared to the another value, (12/IPY)+1, as discussed with respect to Table 2, above. If “yes”, and if a smaller size supply is available
216
, the consumer is advised
218
to replace the depleted supply with a smaller size. If a smaller size is not available, the consumer is advised
228
to replace the depleted supply with the same size supply, and the procedure ends
232
.
While
FIG. 5
depicts an exemplary embodiment with three replacement sizes, the methods of the present invention may be adapted to a greater number of replacement sizes, or to only two replacement sizes. “Replacement size” may also refer to containers having the same external appearance, but varying internal ink volumes. The actual software or firmware implementing the invention may also be differently structured than depicted in
FIG. 5
while performing essentially the same functions.
The present invention may also be used in applications other than inkjet printing in which a container for a consumable substance has an integral memory device for storing calibration and control information.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the foregoing preferred and alternative embodiments, those skilled in the art will understand that many variations may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims. This description of the invention should be understood to include all novel and non-obvious combinations of elements described herein, and claims may be presented in this or a later application to any novel and non-obvious combination of these elements. The foregoing embodiments are illustrative, and no single feature or element is essential to all possible combinations that may be claimed in this or a later application. Where the claims recite “a” or “a first” element of the equivalent thereof, such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements.
Claims
- 1. A printing system adapted to receive replacement consumables having differing consumable capacities, the printing system having electrical interconnects to retrieve from an electronic storage device on a consumable information indicative of a target intervention rate for the consumable and information indicative of a first install date for a consumable, the printing system further comprising executable code for recommending to a printing system user an optimal replacement consumable capacity based on the retrieved information.
- 2. The printing system adapted to receive replacement consumables having differing consumable capacities of claim 1, wherein the executable code for recommending to a printing system user an optimal replacement consumable capacity comprises printer control software executable on a host computer.
- 3. A method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable to replace a currently installed consumable, the method comprising:detecting if a new printing consumable is required; determining the time since the currently installed consumable was initially installed in the printer; retrieving from a memory device integral to the currently installed consumable information indicating a target intervention rate for the currently installed consumable; determining from the time since the currently installed consumable was initially installed in the printer and the target intervention rate a recommended replacement consumable size; and conveying to the consumer information identifying the recommended consumable size.
- 4. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 3, wherein detecting if a new container of consumable substance is required comprises detecting that the currently-installed printing consumable is depleted.
- 5. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 3, wherein detecting if a new container of consumable substance is required comprises determining that the currently-installed printing consumable is older than the currently-installed consumable's expiration date.
- 6. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 5, wherein the currently-installed consumable's expiration date is retrieved from information encoded in the memory device integral to the currently installed consumable.
- 7. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 3, wherein determining the time since the currently installed consumable was initially installed in the printer comprises subtracting a numerical value indicative of a date on which the currently-installed consumable was first installed in a printer from a numerical value indicative of the current date.
- 8. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 7, wherein the numerical value indicative of a date on which the currently-installed consumable was first installed in a printer is retrieved from information encoded in the memory device integral to the currently installed consumable.
- 9. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 7, wherein the numerical value indicative of the current date is determined from a real-time clock of a host computer.
- 10. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 3, wherein the memory device integral to the currently installed consumable comprises a non-volatile semiconductor memory.
- 11. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 3, wherein determining a recommended replacement consumable size comprises:computing from the information indicating a target intervention rate for the currently installed consumable an optimal time range for utilization of the consumable, the optimal time range for utilization having a low end and a high end; comparing the time since the currently installed consumable was initially installed in the printer to the optimal time range low end and to the optimal time range high end; and based on the comparisons, accessing a table of available replacement consumables.
- 12. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 3, wherein conveying to the consumer information identifying the recommended consumable size comprises displaying a message on a display device of a host computer.
- 13. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 3, wherein the printing consumable comprises an ink supply.
- 14. The method of advising a printer user of an optimal-size replacement printing consumable of claim 13, wherein the printing consumable further comprises a printhead.
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
5610635 |
Murray et al. |
Mar 1997 |
A |
6494559 |
Tsuji |
Dec 2002 |
B1 |