The present invention relates generally to electronic devices, and more particularly to memory devices.
Security is a critical issue with almost all aspects of computer use and mobile electronic device use, including portable memory storage devices. This also applies to any electronic products, such as camcorders, digital cameras, iPODs, MP3 players, smart phones, palm computers, gaming devices, etc., using such devices. Whether it is logging into an email account, protecting personal medical info, family pictures, etc. or accessing bank information, information must be supplied to gain access to view personal data. Much money and effort has been applied to guarding personal, corporate, and government information from hackers and others.
In an effort to preserve our identities and prevent unauthorized access to computer systems, it is industry practice to use different login names and passwords for each unique account. Many people currently write this information on paper notes that are carried between home and office, or out of town. Unfortunately, a paper note is not secure. If the paper note is dropped, anyone who finds it has access to all listed accounts.
To prevent access, electronic devices have been created such as a key chain tokens that allow management of up to 50 logins. The downside is that the solution requires manual transfer from a display to the computer and has a limited number of logins.
Further problems are occurring with portable memory devices. These data storage devices are small, ubiquitous, cheap (and getting cheaper), have huge memories (which are getting larger fast), and in today's configurations pose extraordinary security problems. A typical example is the Universal Serial Bus (USB) Flash Drive. The USB is an external peripheral interface standard for communication between a computer and external peripherals over a cable using bi-serial transmission. Millions of USB Flash Drives (UFDs) are being used not only for data backup, transfers, and intermediate storage, but also as primary storage for “portable content”.
Portable content is data or other information that is tied to an owner and not to a particular computer. A host computer is only a way to access and manipulate the portable content. It is becoming critical that portable memory devices have a security system for the content, which is host-independent and self-contained, since the content may otherwise be accessed and manipulated by unauthorized users using different computers in potentially security-hostile environments (kiosks, Internet cafés, presentation stations).
The affected user community is huge and every aspect of society is already vulnerable to security leaks and data compromise. Because the devices lack reliable and usable security features, financial databases, medical records, business records, national security information, in short any confidential information can be exposed and sent anywhere within seconds. Private, government, military, and corporate users are all concerned more than ever with being able to secure information on these portable, tiny, and easy to lose and steal devices, while being able to securely transfer data between different platform computers and embedded systems.
Portable memory devices are commonly connected to different computers in various environments that are security-uncontrolled and security-hostile. Consequently, for any portable memory device that needs security, it is critical that the security system onboard be self-contained and independent of external computers.
The most common means of providing security for information on these devices is to incorporate a password set accessed through software. Unfortunately, such security provides little deterrent to anyone willing to use readily available hacking techniques to get at the data.
There are number of current systems used to gain access to secure devices such as key loggers and USB “sniffers.” These systems can be installed on a target computer without the user's knowledge. Once a password or security exchange has been captured, it can then be sent to a malicious source.
More recently, biometric passwords (such as finger print detectors) have been incorporated into some of these devices and other computer peripherals, like keyboard, laptops, etc. Unfortunately, biometric sensors and security safeguards, by their nature, are capable of being circumvented.
With the growing numbers of portable memory storage devices and electronic products utilizing them, the need for security for the data (medical, financial, corporate, military, songs, pictures, movies, etc.) on these electronic products is greater than ever. No current technology has become available to provide the level of security that users need.
In an effort to prevent identity theft and prevent unauthorized access to computer systems, it is industry practice to use different login names and passwords for each unique account. In addition, it is recommended practice to change passwords at regular intervals. But this is time consuming and causes problems when passwords are forgotten.
Solutions to these problems have been long sought but prior developments have not taught or suggested any solutions and, thus, solutions to these problems have long eluded those skilled in the art.
The present invention provides a method of controlling a security system for an external data storage apparatus, in which the security system of the external data storage apparatus is driven, the method including: an inter-apparatus connection determining step of determining whether or not to be connected with a data terminal requesting input-output data; an ID comparing step of comparing input identification (ID) with the preset ID; and a data storage driving step of preventing an unauthorized data terminal from reading and writing the data stored in the data storage, and thereby preventing the data from leaking out, wherein the ID comparing step includes an ID re-record mode for changing the ID set by an input signal.
The present invention provides an electronic system including: a data storage, in which data is stored; a high-speed serial bus, which connects the data storage with a data terminal, which reads and writes the data stored in the data storage; a key input unit, which converts an identification (ID), which is input by operation of the user, to an electrical signal and outputs the converted signal; a memory, which stores and sets the ID input by the key input unit; and a control circuit, which, when the ID input by the key input unit is applied, compares the input ID with the preset ID stored in the memory and drives the data storage based on the compared results.
Certain embodiments of the invention have other aspects in addition to or in place of those mentioned above. The aspects will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading of the following detailed description when taken with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The following embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments would be evident based on the present disclosure and that process or mechanical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The representation schematics disclose operative connections and components of a memory lock system as well as other devices and/or mechanisms with which it is used.
In the following description, numerous specific details are given to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In order to avoid obscuring the present invention, some well-known circuits, system configurations, and method steps are not disclosed in detail.
Likewise, the drawings showing embodiments of the apparatus/device are semi-diagrammatic and not to scale and, particularly, some of the dimensions are for clarity of presentation and are shown greatly exaggerated in the drawing FIGS. Some of the embodiments are numbered “first”, “second”, etc. merely for convenience of description and the numbering has no significance.
Referring now to
The electronic connector 104 is intended to connect the memory lock system 100 to a computer 112 or other electronic system such as a data terminal, for example. The electronic connector 104 can be a USB connector, a cable connector, a wire, a wireless connector, or other intermediate connection among components. The USB connector can also be thought of as a high-speed serial bus; USB stands for universal serial bus. The manipulatable input device 106 can be a thumb wheel, switch, knob, electromechanical device, or opto-electro-mechanical device. The manipulatable device 106 can also be a capacitive sensor, light sensor, or touch sensitive device. The display 108 can be a numeric, alphabetic, alphanumeric, or graphic (picture) display. The indicator 110 can be a single indicator or a double indicator for a lock and an unlock condition of the memory lock system 100.
Referring now to
Schematically illustrated are the contents of the body 202, which includes a controller, such as a single micro-controller 212, connected by a communication channel 214 to a memory 216, such as a flash memory, micro disk, or other file or data storage system.
The micro-controller 212 is also connected by a communication channel 218 to the connector 204. The micro-controller 212 can have part of its operations dedicated to a data transfer function between the connector 204 and the memory 216 and another part to the locking function or can have the two functions in separate controllers, a data transfer function controller 213 and a locking function controller 215. The manipulatable input device 206 is for entering a combination to match a combination in the micro-controller 212 to unlock or lock the data transfer or for entering a combination to change a combination in the micro-controller 212. In the embodiment of
Where the power for the memory lock system 200 is drawn from the electronic connector 204, the micro-controller 212 can use the locking function controller 215 to shut down the power to or reset the state of the data transfer function controller 213 to prevent or lock data transfer in the micro-controller 212. The micro-controller 212 can also shut down power to or otherwise disable the memory 216 to prevent or lock data transfer in the memory.
The micro-controller 212 can also obviously control switches (not shown) in the communication channel 218 between the electronic connector 204 and the data transfer function controller 213 or in the communication channel 214 between the micro-controller 212 and the memory 216 to control unlocking or locking of the data transfer therebetween. The data transfer function controller 213 can also be called a data storage controller. When unlocked, the micro-controller 212 can write file system information as necessary to the memory 216.
The above can also be set up for disk battery powered systems but more care must be taken so as to conserve battery power. The display 208 can show a locked or unlocked status of the memory lock system 200, which can also be thought of as a driven state of the memory 216.
Referring now to
The memory lock system 300 can be incorporated between any memory, such as a mass storage module 314, and an electronic system 316, such as a digital camera, internal hard drive of the computer, smart phone, palm computer, digital music players, or other computer-type device. The micro-controller 308 is connected by a communication channel 318 to the mass storage module 314 and by a communication channel 320 to the electronic system 316.
While the memory lock system 300 can be powered from the electronic system 316 through an appropriate connector, a portable power source, such as a battery 324, can provide power to the memory lock system 300. The battery 324 may be a so-called high-density “button” battery.
One method of operation is:
In the memory lock systems, the manipulatable device provides security by requiring physical manipulations (i.e. entering a combination, not a software password) before the onboard functions can be addressed. Thus, the memory lock systems are immune to all electronic cracking, hacking, and bypass attempts. Until the onboard security is activated, the memory of the computer or electronic system containing information or data cannot be written to, interrogated, or read from by any electronic product the memory lock system is a part of or to which it may be connected.
Also, any information or data in the memory or file storage cannot be written to, interrogated, or read from by any electronic product the memory lock system is a part of or to which it may be connected.
Unlike other solutions, the memory lock system is self-contained, and integrated with an internal memory (either portable or “internal” to the bigger assembly) in a device. The computer system (for example, laptop, smart phone, desktop computer, etc.) does not need to know there is anything special about the device. In this sense, it is independent of operating systems, drivers, applications and computer platforms. It is applicable for use on an embedded system such as a navigation system in military, commercial and private systems.
The present invention solves some of the following problems associated with current security/protection methods:
Due to platform independence, data can be moved between different operating systems, and various machines, instruments, and any embedded piece of electronic equipment.
The memory lock system is a “controlled access (lock/unlock)” memory system that can be integrated (internally or externally) with any type of electronic products including, but not limited to smart-phones, cell-phones, iPODs, MP3 players, gaming devices, camcorders, digital cameras, computers, and palm computers. The memory device allows the user to save virtually any proprietary information including, but not limited to, accounts, user names, passwords, financial, credit card information, web links, medical info/records, corporate, military, etc.
In addition, it acts as a secure backup device whose contents cannot be viewed until unlocked (for example, personal medical, financial info, digital pictures, etc.). The lock consists of an electromechanical device that acts much like existing mechanical combination locks.
In application as a “portable memory” device (such as an external memory device exemplified by a flash drive of the memory lock system 100 of
For some applications, the “lock” can have a “timer” which can be set to be keeping the lock “locked” for a certain period of time or until a certain date. Once connected, an application is invoked that provides access to encrypted data stored internally. The memory lock must remain attached to the computer to view its contents. If the memory lock is unplugged, the application terminates. The memory becomes locked again.
One of the usages of the present invention is to store/manage login credentials. Of course, there are many others like—“portable content” storage, medical records, digital pictures, financial/corporate data, military applications, multifactor authentication for online banking, and many others.
Also, the memory lock system is capable of storing any file containing confidential information (personal, financial, medical records, etc.). Confidential files can be accessed like any other file on a computer as long as the memory device is unlocked.
The memory lock system 300 could be used for controlled access to many computing devices, electronic products, and applications, e.g. videogames for kids, digital music players, iPODs, camcorders, laptops, smart phones, palm computers, etc. It could be also used in financial industry to provide a “physical” component to a multifactor authentication.
Also, with a memory lock system, cell phone users concerned with security (army, CIA, and any other government and security sensitive people) can protect information in case a cell phone is lost or stolen. One method would use an external memory that contains or protects calling information. Contact information is kept externally instead of internally in the cell phone directory. Phone numbers are referenced from the memory lock system. Once a call has been completed, any internal records of calls and contacts will be erased.
The following are features/functions of different embodiments of the present invention:
The following are additional features/functions of various embodiments of:
In the present invention, the following terms have the following meanings:
Power Source—is a means of supplying power to the present invention.
Input Device—a mechanism to input a sequence of states that can be translated into a combination for display and authentication.
Output Device—a display or indicator to supply feedback to the user to indicate locked & unlocked status.
File/Memory Storage—a medium for storing information, data, and files.
Controller—a micro-controller for monitoring the input device and translating events for the purpose of unlocking or locking the device. It is also used to translate events into some form of output for locked status. Its main function is to internally unlock or lock information transfer between the memory storage and communication channel in an appropriate protocol.
Combination—can be a sequence of input changes or states that can be reflected as an alphanumeric (or color/picture based) sequence. This input sequence is then compared with an expected value for unlocking
Battery—electrochemical device for supplying power when the memory lock system is not drawing power from a USB port or other communication channel.
USB—Universal Serial Bus communication port and drivers necessary to communicate with host PC.
Mechanical/motion based generator—a mechanism for translating kinetic energy into electronic.
Solar generator—method of translating light energy into electronic energy.
Thumb wheel—input device for controlling ascending or descending alphanumeric indicators. Turning in one direction causes numbers to increase, turning in the opposite direction causes numbers to decrease (for example).
Rocker Switch—similar to a thumb wheel and is used for controlling ascending or descending alphanumeric indicators. Pressing one side of the switch causes numbers to increase; pressing the other side causes numbers to decrease.
Touch Pad—input device similar to that associated with notebook computers. The pad is broken up into a grid. Actuating specific areas in the grid in a specific order creates a combination used for unlocking
Selector Switch—a switch that does not require power to operate. It contains a physical mechanism for retaining its location like the selector switch for controlling the lights on your car. The controller reads its state after power is applied.
Encoder—a dynamic switch whose outputs change in relation to the direction of motion. Its use is similar to that of a thumb wheel.
Push Button Array—like a quick unlock seen on some security doors, pushing a sequence of buttons in a certain order provides the mechanism for unlocking
Potentiometer—a potentiometer is like a one dimensional touch pad. The difference is that its location can be fixed without power. The potentiometer state is read once power is applied. Readings by an A/D converter translate position into values used for unlocking
Photoelectric switch—a component that is able to differentiate between light levels. This could be used as a mode of input by covering/uncovering the sensing device.
Membrane switch—a component that is able to differentiate between “up” and “down” position of the membrane (similar to the push buttons but much lower profile). This could be used as a mode of input when the height of the device is a critical issue.
Alphanumeric Display—a means of displaying alphanumeric data representing a combination for unlocking
Colored LED—an indicator of locked and unlocked status. For example, red could indicate locked & green unlocked.
Audio—provides audio feedback as to locked and unlocked state.
Solid State Memory—SRAM, DRAM, EPROM, EEPROM, Flash, magnetic, ferromagnetic, or any other type of electronic memory used to store information without moving parts. This would also include U3 smart drives that can contain an entire operating system with applications.
Rotating Media—includes the class of traditional and portable hard drives and its derivatives used to store information and requiring moving parts.
Referring now to
The power source of a memory lock system can be at least one or more batteries, a computer battery through a USB connection, a motion-based generator, a solar cell, or other source of electricity such as a fuel cell, etc.
The input device can be a thumb wheel, rocker switch, touch pad, selector switch, encoder, push buttons, potentiometer, key lock, or other manipulatable device, such as capacitive sensors, etc.
The output device can be alpha-numeric, numeric only, alphabetic only, colored light emitting diodes (LEDs), audio, none, or other output, such as tactile Braille pins, etc.
The memory type can be a solid state memory, rotating media, or other memory, such as linear tape, etc.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The memory lock system 500A includes a body 502A connected to a swivel 504A which allows the body 502A to turn as shown by the arrow 506A relative to the swivel 504A to accommodate for different positions of the connector 508A.
The body 502A includes a display 510A. The display 510A includes an unlock/lock symbol 512A, an alphabetic character display 514A, and a numeric display 516A.
To change the alphanumeric characters, the memory lock system 500A is provided with a thumb wheel 518A.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The thumb-wheel switch 514J can be turned as a thumb wheel and/or depressed to act as a switch. Numbers can be provided on the thumb wheel and activated by depressing the switch to enter the combination number.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The unit is powered up in a block 602 and the program progresses to setting the input attempts=0 in a block 604.
The user inputs a combination sequence in a block 606. The program then progresses to a decision block 608 to determine if the input attempts are greater than a certain number x. If the number of attempts that the user has made to input the combination sequence is under x, the program progresses to a decision block 610 to determine if the combination is correct. If “yes”, the program progresses to an unlock memory device block 612 to allow access to the memory 216 of
If the combination is not correct in the decision block 610, the program proceeds to increment the input attempts in input attempts=input attempts+1 in a block 614. The program then progresses to cause the indicator 210 of
The above assures that the user may only input a certain number of times before the system shuts down.
The device will again regain operation when:
The anti-hacking system 600 is structured such that, when X attempts have been made at unlocking, the unit will respond as if a correct combination fails also. When the device is disconnected from its power source or re-awakes from sleep mode, Input Attempts in the block 604 is reset to 0 and the device can then again function as normal.
Referring now to
The memory lock system 200 is powered up in a block 702, and the user unlocks the memory lock system 200 in a block 704 using a first combination that was previously in the memory lock system 200 from the factory or previously entered by the user. As soon as the unlock occurs, the program starts a timer in start reprogram timer block 706. This is to prevent unattended and unlocked devices from being stolen and reconfigured.
The user must then enter the new combination in a block 708. If the reprogram timer did not expire in a decision block 710, the program moves to show that the memory lock system 200 is receptive to the entry of a new combination by providing an indication to re-enter the new combination in a block 712. The indication can be by an audio, visual, or tactile signal. The user re-enters the new combination in a block 714 to double check the new combination.
A check is made to see if the new combination was entered in time in a reprogram timer expired decision block 716. If “yes”, the program proceeds to do a compare in a first and second new combinations match decision block 718. If “yes”, the memory lock system 200 indicates that it is unlocked in a block 720 and the new combination is recorded in a box 722.
If the reprogram timer expired in the decision block 710 or 716, the program will proceed to relock the system in a block 724. Finally, if the first and second new combinations do not match, the program proceeds to relock the memory lock system 200 in the system relock in the block 724.
Of course, there are several variations how a memory lock system is designed and built:
In a further embodiment of the combination reconfiguring to reset the memory lock system:
Referring now to
It understood that appearance-wise, the memory lock system 802 could be implemented in many different forms/shapes and combined with different known products (for example, key ring USB Flash drives, digital USB/watches, music players, portable memory devices, camcorders, laptops, smart phones, palm computers, etc.).
The two-factor authentication system 800 further includes a customer computer 804 capable of being connected to a financial institution host computer 806 by a connection 808, such as a telephone line, Internet connection, etc.
Financial institutions are currently trying to implement two-factor authentication systems, which require two separate factors for identification to reduce identity theft and unauthorized access to financial accounts. For example in an ideal system, both a fingerprint and an eye print have to be provided before access is given to a financial account.
Current approaches to two-factor authentication systems include:
All current devices suffer from the same shortcoming in that they can be lost or stolen and the subsequent possessor can access the financial accounts.
For the two-factor authentication system 800 to work, it has to comply with the following rules:
The two-factor authentication system 800 will increase security and simplify customer experience at the same time.
In operation, the user connects the memory lock system 802 to the customer computer 804 and unlocks the memory lock system 802 using the user's combination. The memory lock system 802 provides the first factor for two-factor authentication and the user's combination provides the second factor, which allows access to information in the memory lock system memory that the financial institution will recognize.
The user then accesses the financial institution host computer 806 by the connection 808, such as the Internet. The financial institution recognizes the information and allows access.
Referring now to
While the invention has been described in conjunction with a specific best mode, it is to be understood that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the aforegoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of the included claims. All matters hithertofore set forth herein or shown in the accompanying drawings are to be interpreted in an illustrative and non-limiting sense.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/996,501 filed Jan. 22, 2008, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,075,571, which is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US2006/028479 filed Jul. 20, 2006, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/595,631, filed Jul. 21, 2005, and the subject matter thereof is incorporated herein by reference thereto. The present application contains subject matter related to concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/718,741, filed May 21, 2015, entitled “MEMORY LOCK SYSTEM WITH MANIPULATABLE INPUT DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATION THEREOF”. The present application contains subject matter related to concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/719,185, filed May 21, 2015, entitled “MEMORY LOCK SYSTEM WITH MANIPULATABLE INPUT DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATION THEREOF”.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5479341 | Pihl et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5623637 | Jones et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5841361 | Hoffman | Nov 1998 | A |
5974513 | Matsuo et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6067621 | Yu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6237100 | Cromer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6324537 | Moran | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6547130 | Shen | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6857076 | Klein | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6904493 | Chiao | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7069447 | Corder | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7117369 | Burns et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7120251 | Kawada et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7228438 | Bushmitch et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7257714 | Shen | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7260726 | Doe et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7272723 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7376831 | Kollmyer et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7469302 | Whittle et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7536548 | Batke et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7631195 | Yu et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
8266378 | Jevans et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8832440 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843768 | Vogel | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8972741 | Awatsu et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9075571 | Bolotin et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9262611 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20010008015 | Vu et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010016895 | Sakajiri et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010036109 | Jha et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010056539 | Pavlin et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010827 | Cheng | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020078361 | Giroux et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112168 | Filipi-Martin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030005336 | Poo et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046567 | Carman | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046593 | Xie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030128101 | Long | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040059907 | Cochran et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064708 | Angelo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088574 | Walter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040236919 | Okaue et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040268074 | Yagi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027997 | Ueno et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039027 | Shapiro | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050367 | Burger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086497 | Nakayama | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050138390 | Adams et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144464 | Chiu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182971 | Ong et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182973 | Funahashi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060036872 | Yen | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064604 | Osaki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060176146 | Krishan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060198515 | Forehand et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060204047 | Dave et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242693 | Kussmaul | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016743 | Jevans | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070061894 | Skinner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083939 | Fruhauf et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112981 | Hernandez | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113276 | Shoji et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118745 | Buer | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118891 | Buer | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162962 | Baum et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169200 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180270 | Kumagai et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070258585 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258594 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080005409 | Kolokowsky | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080126813 | Kawakami | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130959 | Kim | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080209224 | Lord | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219449 | Ball et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080229118 | Kasako et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090006863 | Mizuno | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090097653 | Dahlerud | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125726 | Iyer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144361 | Nobakht et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090199004 | Krawczewicz et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220088 | Lu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100049993 | Okaue et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100174913 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174922 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199334 | Ehrensvard et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235575 | Yasaki et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110060921 | Michael | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110113255 | Kuster et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110307724 | Shaw et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314279 | Ureche et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20150278124 | Bolotin et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281205 | Bolotin et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160119339 | Bolotin et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160259736 | Bolotin et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2736827 | Oct 2005 | CN |
1372080 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1657645 | May 2006 | EP |
1982262 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2004070467 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004086584 | Mar 2004 | JP |
20050119751 | Dec 2005 | KR |
I235329 | Jul 2005 | TW |
0042491 | Jul 2000 | WO |
2005017758 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2007014074 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007087340 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, filed May 21, 2015, Bolotin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,185, filed May 21, 2015, Bolotin et al. |
Ali Ahmed, “Corsair Flash Padlock”, “http://smartguy31.blogspot.com/2008/08/corsair-flash-padlock.html”, Aug. 25, 2008, p. 1 Technology & Innovation. |
Arnold, “Embedded Controller Hardware Design”, 2001, p. 4 Publisher: LLH Technology Publishing. |
Breeden et al., “The 11 best products of 2011”, “http://gcn.com/Articles/2011/11/07/11-best-products-of-2011.aspx?Page=1”, Nov. 4, 2011, p. 2, GCN: Technology, Tools and TActics for Public Sector IT. |
Convery, “Network Security Architectures”, “ProQuest Tech Books”, Apr. 19, 2004, p. 12 Cisco Press, Safari. Books Online. |
Crowe, “At last, a key drive the government can love”, “http://gcn.com/Articles/2011/09/05/Review-of-the-LOK-IT-SDG003FM-4GB.aspx”, Sep. 1, 2011, p. 2, GCN: Technology, Tools and TActics for Public Sector IT. |
Datashur, “Finally, the arrival of an ultra-secure, easy to use and affordable USB Flash Drive”, “http://www.istorage-uk.com/datashur.php”, 2014, p. 2. |
Goodwin, “A new take on securing USB flash drives”, “http://www.gsnmagazine.com/node/24951”, Nov. 9, 2011, p. 2, Government Security News. |
IEEE, “Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms”, “Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms”, Dec. 2000, pp. 219-221, vol. 7th ed, IEEE. |
Wolf, “LOK-IT Secure Flash Drive”, “http://www.lok-it.net/secure-flash-drive-government/”, 2014, p. 5 Systematic Development Group. |
Merriam-Webster, “Merriam-Webster.com/Dictionary”, 2013, p. 4 www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manipulate. |
Biersdorfer, “Keeping Pocket-Size Data Under Lock and Key”, “The New York Times”, Aug. 30, 2007, p. 1, The New York Times Company, NY, USA. |
O'Brien et al., “7 secure USB drives”, Mar. 3, 2008, p. 13 Computerworld. |
Oprah, “The O List: Sep. 2008, 6 of 9—Better Safe Than Sorry”, “http://www.oprah.com/omagazine/The-O-List-September-2008/6”, Sep. 2008, p. 1, O, The Oprah Magazine. |
Cisco Cheng, “Corsair Launches Secure and Rugged Flash Drives”, Sep. 19, 2007, PC Magazine, Published in: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2185166,00.asp. |
Rubenking, “Aegis Secure Key”, “http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2397935,00.asp, Aegis Secure Key Review & Rating”, Dec. 21, 2011, p. 2 PCMag.com. |
Sandisk, “Sandisk Introduces TriFlash, a High Capacity Small-Size Embedded Flash Memory Device”, “Business Wire”, Nov. 13, 2000, p. 6, The Free Library. |
Schneier, “Schneier on Security: Crypto Implementation Failure”, Mar. 4, 2010, p. 42 Volume blog. |
Vochin, “Corsair Rolls Out the Flash Padlock USB Flash Drives with Touch-Pad and Security PIN Entry System”, “http://news.softpedia.com/news/Corsair-Rolls-Out-the-Flash-Padlock-USB-Flash-Drives-with-Touch-Pad-Security-PIN-Entry-System-62986.shtml”, Aug. 17, 2007, p. 1, Softpedia. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, 312 Amendment filed Apr. 30, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, 312 Amendment filed May 26, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Advisory Action dated Jan. 8, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Advisory Action dated Jan. 25, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Advisory Action dated Jul. 8, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Advisory Action dated Aug. 6, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Appeal Brief filed May 5, 2011”, 32 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Examiner Interview Summary dated Apr. 8, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief dated Jun. 3, 2011”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Final Office Action dated May 31, 2012”. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Final Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2013”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Final Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2010”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2012”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2014”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2013”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2010”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 25, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication dated May 13, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, PTO Response to Rule 312 Communication dated Jun. 1, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Jan. 18, 2011 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2010”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Feb. 28, 2014 to Advisory Action dated Jan. 8, 2014”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Apr. 9, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 27, 2014”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed May 9, 2012 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 24, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Jun. 25, 2014 to Final Office Action dated Apr. 25, 2014”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Jul. 25, 2014 to Advisory Action dated Jul. 8, 2014”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Jul. 31, 2012 to Final Office Action dated May 31, 2012”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Aug. 3, 2011 to Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief dated Jun. 3, 2011”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Sep. 26, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Oct. 30, 2010 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2010”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Oct. 30, 2012 to Advisory Action dated Aug. 6, 2012”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,501, Response filed Dec. 30, 2013 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, Final Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2017”, 30 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2016”, 28 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, Response filed Jan. 20, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2016”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,185, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2016”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,185, Response filed Feb. 9, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2016”, 14 pgs. |
“Definition of “manipulate”, Free Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary”, Merriam-Webster, [Online] retrieved from the internet:www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manipulate, (2013,2014), 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 06788183.9, Examination Notification Art. 94(3) dated Jan. 27, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 06788183.9, Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 16, 2010”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 06788183.9, Response filed Jul. 14, 2011 to Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 16, 2010”, 18 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 15202096.2, Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 25, 2016”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 15202096.2, Response filed Dec. 5, 2016 to Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 25, 2016”, 17 pgs. |
“IEEE. IEEE 100 The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms”, IEEE Press, (Dec. 2000), 219-221. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/028479, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 22, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/028479, International Search Report dated Dec. 28, 2006”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2006/028479, Written Opinion dated Dec. 28, 2006”, 3 pgs. |
“Microsoft Computer Dictionary”, Microsoft, 5th ed., (2002), 4 pgs. |
“Office Action for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 95126664”, 1 pg. |
“Sandisk Introduces TriFlash, a High Capacity Small-Size Embedded Flash Memory Device; Initial ‘Megamarkets’ for TriFlash Internet Music Players and Cell Phones”, Business Editors. Business Wire, (Nov. 2000), 6 pgs. |
“Taiwanese Application Serial No. 095126664, Office Action dated May 12, 2010”, (With English Translation), 6 pgs. |
“Taiwanese Application Serial No. 095126664, Response filed Aug. 13, 2010 to Office Action dated May 12, 2010”, With English Translation of Claims, 35 pgs. |
Fila, Jeff, “APC Biometric Password Manager Review”, Accessed Jan. 30, 2017, [Online] retrieved from the internet:WaybackMachine <http://www.digitaltrends.com/pc-accessory-reviews/apc-biometric-password-manager-review/>, (2004), 7 pgs. |
Schneier, Bruce, et al., “Crypto Implementation Failure”, Schneier on Security, [Online] retrieved from the internet:https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/03/crypto_implemen.html, (Mar. 2010). |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, Response filed May 17, 2017 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2017”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,185, Final Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2017”, 23 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,185, Response filed Jun. 14, 2017 to Final Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2017”, 12 pgs. |
Granger, Sarah, “The Simplest Security:A Guide to Better Password Practices”, [Online] retrieved from the internet: <http://web.archive.Org/web/20020123134242/http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1537>, (Jan. 2002), 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, Advisory Action dated Jan. 12, 2018”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, Final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2017”, 26 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2017”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, Response filed Oct. 16, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2017”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/718,741, Response filed Dec. 20, 2017 to Final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,185, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2017”, 22 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150278125 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60595631 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11996501 | US | |
Child | 14719205 | US |