Memory subsystem hibernation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8892831
  • Patent Number
    8,892,831
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 18, 2008
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 18, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
In a managed memory subsystem, information associated with the memory subsystem is copied from volatile memory in the memory subsystem to host system memory. The copying can be over a standard interface. Responsive to memory subsystem power up from a powered down state or power loss, the information is copied from the host system memory back to the volatile memory in the memory subsystem, where the information can be used by the memory subsystem to perform memory operations. Transferring information from host system memory to volatile memory in a memory subsystem is faster and more power efficient than transferring the same information from non-volatile memory to volatile memory in the memory subsystem.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This subject matter is generally related to managing solid state memory systems.


BACKGROUND

Managed memory solutions use industry-standard interfaces to provide seamless integration with host processors and eliminate the need for host systems to manage the complexity and deficiency of built-in memory devices. A typical managed memory solution integrates memory and an embedded controller. The embedded controller can emulate a block device interface, thus replacing emulation that is commonly performed by the host system.


In some managed memory solutions, an embedded controller in the memory subsystem uses volatile memory to store information related to the current state of the memory subsystem. A copy of this state information is also stored in non-volatile memory of the memory subsystem to preserve the information in case of power loss.


When the memory subsystem is powered up from a powered down or power loss state, the embedded controller reads the state information from non-volatile memory and stores the information in volatile memory for easy access. The process of reading state information from non-volatile memory and storing the state information in volatile memory in the memory subsystem takes time due to overhead and some processing of the state information. This delay, however, is often of no concern when this power down/power up cycle is infrequent (e.g., during initial power up).


To save power, it can be desirable to shut down power to a memory subsystem frequently. Every time the memory subsystem is powered up from a shutdown state, the memory subsystem reads state information from non-volatile memory as previously described. If this shutdown/power up cycle occurs on a regular basis, the additional reads to non-volatile memory and subsequent data processing can cause delay and loss of power which can negate any benefit obtained by frequently shutting down power to the memory subsystem.


SUMMARY

In a managed memory subsystem, information associated with the memory subsystem is copied from volatile memory in the memory subsystem to host system memory. The copying can be over a standard interface. Responsive to memory subsystem power up from a powered down state or power loss, the information is copied from the host system memory back to the volatile memory in the memory subsystem, where the information can be used by the memory subsystem to perform memory operations. Transferring information from host system memory to volatile memory in a memory subsystem is faster and more power efficient than transferring the same information from non-volatile memory to volatile memory in the memory subsystem.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example managed memory system.



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of an example boot process for the managed memory system of FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Example System


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of example managed memory system 100. The Managed memory system 100 can be a solid state memory system (e.g., a managed NAND system) formed on a single substrate or chip (e.g., system on chip (SoC)). In some implementations, system 100 can include host system 102 coupled to memory subsystem 104 by interface 110. Interface 110 can be a standard interface, such as Advanced Technology Attachment (ATA) standard interface, MultiMediaCard (MMC) interface or Secure Digital (SD) interface. Some examples of memory subsystem 104 can include MMC/SD cards or SSD.


Memory subsystem 104 can include controller 106 coupled to non-volatile memory 120 by interface 112. Controller 106 can be an embedded controller. Interface 112 can be a NAND interface, for example. Block device emulator 122 can be a software layer which translates logical sector requests from host system 102 to physical reads/writes to non-volatile memory 120. Driver 118 in controller 106 can be a low-level driver that reads from and writes to non-volatile memory 120 (e.g., NAND memory). Volatile memory 116 (e.g., RAM) which can be integrated in, or accessible by, controller 106 can be used to store information relating to a current state of memory subsystem 104. States can include, for example, a mapping of logical sectors requested by host system 102 on non-volatile memory 120. More particularly, volatile memory 116 can store tables that translate requests from host system 102 to non-volatile memory 120. This state information is often stored in non-volatile memory 120 as well, so if there is a power shutdown or failure, controller 106 can retrieve the state information from non-volatile memory 120 and store the information in volatile memory 116 for quick access. The dashed lines conceptually illustrate this process. Memory subsystem 104 may include other components which have been omitted from FIG. 1 for clarity.


Host system 102 (e.g., a media player, mobile phone, digital camera) includes host processor 126 and memory 114 (e.g., RAM). Host processor 126 can execute instructions (e.g., firmware) to control communications across interface 110 and to access memory 114. If memory 114 is volatile memory, then memory 114 can be periodically refreshed by host processor 126. Host system 102 may include other components which have been omitted from FIG. 1 for clarity.


Example Process


FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of an example power up process 200 for system 100 of FIG. 1. In some implementations, process 200 can begin when information (e.g., state information) is copied from volatile memory (e.g., RAM) in a memory subsystem to memory in a host system (202) coupled to the memory subsystem. For example, the information can include a physical address in non-volatile memory where the managed NAND is storing state information which can be used for a faster boot. Typically, NAND drivers save state information on the NAND so that when the system boots up the state information is read from the NAND. The state information is not always stored in the same location in NAND due to wear leveling algorithms. By sending the physical address of the state information to the host device, the managed NAND subsystem need not export the state information to the host device which can result in a faster boot time than if the state information was sent to the host device.


Next, a power-related trigger event (e.g., a power up request) is received or detected by the memory subsystem (204). In some implementations, the power-related trigger event can be an intentional power down of the memory subsystem to conserve power. Such an implementation can be useful for battery-operated devices.


Responsive to the power-related trigger event, the information is read from memory in the host system to volatile memory in the memory subsystem (206). Once the information is stored in the volatile memory, the information can be easily accessed by, for example, an embedded controller in the memory subsystem. In some implementations, the volatile memory can be included in the embedded controller. In other implementations, volatile memory can be included in other portions of the memory subsystem or external to the memory subsystem.


A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made. For example, elements of one or more implementations may be combined, deleted, modified, or supplemented to form further implementations. As yet another example, the logic flows depicted in the figures do not require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In addition, other steps may be provided, or steps may be eliminated, from the described flows, and other components may be added to, or removed from, the described systems. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: copying state information from a volatile memory of a managed memory system into a non-volatile memory included in the managed memory system, wherein the state information includes information used to map logical sector requests from a host system to the non-volatile memory;copying address information from the volatile memory of the managed memory system to a volatile memory of the host system coupled to the managed memory system, wherein the address information includes a physical address of the state information stored in the non-volatile memory;responsive to a power-related trigger event, reading the address information from the volatile host system memory; andusing the physical address included in the address information read from the volatile memory of the host system to access the state information stored in the non-volatile memory.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the managed memory system is a managed NAND memory system.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the address information is copied over a bus that conforms to at least one of the following standard bus protocols: Advanced Technology Attachment (ATA), MultiMediaCard (MMC) and Secure Digital (SD).
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the volatile memory of the managed memory system is accessible by an embedded controller in the managed memory system.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising detecting the power-related trigger event by the managed memory system.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the power-related trigger event comprises the managed memory system powering up from a powered down or power loss state.
  • 7. A memory system, comprising: a host system comprising volatile memory; anda managed memory system comprising volatile memory and non-volatile memory, wherein information related to the managed memory system is stored in the volatile memory, and wherein the managed memory system comprises a processor configured to: copy state information from the volatile memory of the managed memory system into the non-volatile memory of the managed memory system, wherein the state information includes information used to map logical sector requests from the host system to the non-volatile memory of the managed memory system;copy address information from the volatile memory of the managed memory system to the volatile memory of the host system, wherein the address information includes a physical address of the state information stored in the non-volatile memory;read, responsive to a power-related trigger event, the address information from the volatile host system memory; anduse the physical address included in the address information read from the volatile memory of the host system to access the state information stored in the non-volatile memory.
  • 8. The memory system of claim 7, wherein the managed memory system is a managed NAND memory system.
  • 9. The memory system of claim 7, wherein the address information is copied over a bus that conforms to at least one of the following bus protocols: Advanced Technology Attachment (ATA), MultiMediaCard (MMC) and Secure Digital (SD).
  • 10. The memory system of claim 7, wherein the processor is further configured to detect the power-related trigger event.
  • 11. The memory system of claim 7, wherein the power-related trigger event comprises the managed memory system powering up from a powered down or power loss state.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/021,560, for “Memory Subsystem Hibernation,” filed Jan. 16, 2008, which provisional application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (43)
Number Name Date Kind
4323987 Holtz et al. Apr 1982 A
5341330 Wells et al. Aug 1994 A
5689704 Yoshida et al. Nov 1997 A
5950013 Yoshimura et al. Sep 1999 A
6188650 Hamada et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199076 Logan et al. Mar 2001 B1
6263453 Anderson Jul 2001 B1
6282624 Kimura et al. Aug 2001 B1
6388961 Ijichi May 2002 B1
6427186 Lin et al. Jul 2002 B1
6832293 Tagawa et al. Dec 2004 B1
6876469 Nakamura Apr 2005 B1
7099239 Ogikubo Aug 2006 B2
7139937 Kilbourne et al. Nov 2006 B1
7234024 Kiselev Jun 2007 B1
7412558 Oribe et al. Aug 2008 B2
7523249 Estakhri et al. Apr 2009 B1
20030061189 Baskins et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030093610 Lai et al. May 2003 A1
20040062119 Stimak et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103238 Avraham et al. May 2004 A1
20040186946 Lee Sep 2004 A1
20050251617 Sinclair et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060008256 Khedouri et al. Jan 2006 A1
20070011445 Waltermann et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016721 Gay Jan 2007 A1
20070073764 Oks et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070124531 Nishihara May 2007 A1
20070130441 Wooten Jun 2007 A1
20070136523 Bonella et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070204128 Lee et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070300037 Rogers et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080104308 Mo et al. May 2008 A1
20080162814 Kim Jul 2008 A1
20080177937 Nishihara et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080189452 Merry et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090083478 Kunimatsu et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090089481 Kapoor et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090150641 Flynn et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090198902 Khmelnitsky et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198947 Khmelnitsky et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090198952 Khmelnitsky et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090307409 Rogers et al. Dec 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
WO 9420906 Sep 1994 WO
WO 2009100031 Aug 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 9, 2009, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2009/032886, 20 pages.
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and Partial International Search Report, dated May 14, 2009, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2009/032886, 10 pages.
Post et al., “IndelDS Oct. 7, 2009 Cache Tree”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,267, filed Jul. 24, 2009.
Wakrat et al., “Restore IndelDS Oct. 7, 2009 Page”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,071, filed Jul. 24, 2009.
Rogers, et al., “Device Memory Management”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/134,998, filed Jun. 6, 2008.
International Search Report/Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/42707 mailed Sep. 7, 2010, 8 pages.
International Search Report/Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/42696 mailed Sep.14, 2010, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report in EP 10 17 0700 mailed Nov. 29, 2010, 7 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090182962 A1 Jul 2009 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61021560 Jan 2008 US