This application claims priority to co-pending United Kingdom utility application entitled, “Memory Tag, Method for Providing Information and Enabling the Release of Stored Content, and Apparatus therefor” having serial no. GB 0512014.2, filed Jun. 14, 2005, which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a memory tag, and a method and associated apparatus for providing information and enabling the release of stored content.
A memory tag is described in EP-A-1422658. The tag is an RFID memory tag provided on a chip, and comprises a memory, an RFID transponder circuit, a power supply capacitor and an antenna coil.
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of providing information, the method comprising interrogating a memory tag; receiving content from the memory tag by wireless electromagnetic communication in response to the interrogation, the memory tag comprising a memory and a transponder to enable the wireless electromagnetic communication; storing the content; sending a release request to an authoriser; receiving a release confirmation from the authoriser which is responsive to the release request; and releasing the stored content in response to receipt of the release confirmation.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of enabling the release of stored content, the method comprising receiving a release request from a client; and sending a release confirmation to the client in response to the release request, the release confirmation enabling stored content received from a memory tag by wireless communication to be released, the memory tag comprising a memory and a transponder to enable the wireless communication.
Typically the stored content is encrypted, the release request comprises a decryption key, and the step of releasing the stored content comprises decrypting the stored content using the decryption key.
Typically the step of releasing the stored content comprises outputting the stored content to a user interface. The user interface may be for example an audio speaker, an electronic display device, or a printer.
Typically a summary of the content, and/or a cost indication is received from the memory tag by wireless electromagnetic communication, and output to a user. The output may be in any human-discernible form. This enables a user to decide whether to send the release request, dependent on the summary and/or the cost indication, and provide user input accordingly.
Typically an authoriser address is received from the memory tag by wireless electromagnetic communication, and the release request is sent to the authoriser address. This enables different tags to be provided, each associated with a respective different authoriser.
Typically the memory tag is powered as a result of the wireless electromagnetic communication by inductive coupling.
The method lends itself to a micropayment system, in which a plurality of said release requests are sent, each release request having an associated cost; a plurality of said release confirmations are received, each release confirmation being responsive to a respective release request; and an aggregate cost is generated in accordance with the sum of the associated costs. This aggregate cost can be used to bill an account holder and/or to issue an aggregate payment instruction to a bank or other institution.
Preferably the release request and/or release confirmation are sent as Short Message Service (SMS) messages, to provide relatively low latency.
A third aspect of the invention provides apparatus for providing information, the apparatus comprising a reader adapted to interrogate a memory tag and receive content from the memory tag by wireless electromagnetic communication in response to the interrogation, the memory tag comprising a memory and a transponder to enable the wireless electromagnetic communication; a store for storing the content; means for sending a release request to an authoriser; means for receiving a release confirmation from the authoriser which is responsive to the release request; and means for releasing the stored content in response to receipt of the release confirmation.
The method/apparatus of the first aspect of the invention (which relates to a “client” end) and the method/apparatus of the second aspect of the invention (which relates to a “server” end) may be combined in an integrated system.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
A hand held reader 3 (which may be provided as an integrated part of a cellphone) is used to communicate with the memory tag 2 in a wireless manner. Referring now to
The reader 3 reads the memory tag 2 by a wireless electromagnetic communication link 30, and powers the memory tag as a result of the wireless communication by inductive coupling. The reader 3 interrogates the tag by being brought into physical proximity with the tag. Optionally the step of interrogating the tag may also require a user to press a button on the keypad of the phone, causing an interrogation signal to be transmitted to the tag. In response to the interrogation, the reader 3 receives the encrypted content of the tag, a summary of the content of the tag, and a message that the content is encrypted, but can be received by messaging an address at a particular cost (for instance the cost of sending 1 SMS message plus a certain number of “upload units”, or else some amount of money). The content may be encrypted by any suitable encryption method, such as PGP encryption. The content is stored onboard the reader 3 in a memory 31, and the cost and summary are output on an electronic display 33. The user is asked whether he wishes to decrypt the stored content—if the user inputs “yes”, a decryption request SMS 5 is sent to a content provider 4 as described in further detail below. If “no”, the content is preferably deleted directly from the memory 31. The decryption request SMS 5 is sent to the content provider 4 or their designate (a content aggregator, for example). The content provider 4 then sends a bill 6 of the agreed cost to the user's service provider 7, notifying the service provider 7 of the user's address (or some other user identifier) so that the service provider 7 can establish that the user is a valid account holder with available credit. The content provider 4 then waits for approval from the service provider 7 (or waits a set time for the service provider 6 to object) and then sends a key back to the reader 3 via an SMS message 8. The reader 3 receives the SMS message 8 and applies the key to the stored content to release it for the appropriate use. The content may of course be provided in a form in which even though unencrypted, its use is still restricted. After decrypting the content, the reader outputs the decrypted content in the form of an image file on a wireless link 19 to a printer 18. The wireless link 19 may be for example a Bluetooth, IrDA or 802.11x link.
The service provider 7 has to receive a notification that a service has been provided by the content provider 4 to the user for which there is a cost. This may be a simple (and usually small) monetary cost. The system addresses this cost by way of an aggregator 9 which groups it with other such costs for the user in billing the user, and groups it with other such credits for the content provider. Thus, the aggregator 9 receives a series of cost notifications 15 from the service provider 7 over the course of a month, sums the costs to generate an aggregate cost, and at the end of the month sends an aggregate pay instruction 10 to the bank 11 of the service provider, based on the aggregate cost. The bank 11 subsequently makes a payment 12 to the bank 13 of the content provider. The aggregator 9 also sends an aggregate bill 16 to the account holder 17, based on the aggregate cost (and any other costs incurred over the course of the month). Aggregate payment and aggregate billing both reduce the accounting overhead. The service provider 7 would logically look to take a cut of some form. An advantage of having an agreed “upload unit” is that it would be then easy to fold the cost of micropayments into a tariff. A typical tariff may cover, for example, 60 minutes of talk time, 50 SMS messages and 50 upload units.
In summary, the system of
In the example of
A first alternative embodiment is shown in
A second alternative embodiment is shown in
The micropayment mechanism described herein is probably most suitable for content which has some value but a small value. If the value is greater than this, it becomes attractive to users to make the content that they have received available on another channel (perhaps to recoup the cost). The latency, using SMS messages, should be relatively small. Security aspects could be minimised to reduced latency, particularly when the value is not great. For example, parties accept some risk by the content provider 4 providing the key directly in response to a request, on the assumption that the request is a valid one.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0512014.2 | Jun 2005 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6011858 | Stock et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
7121471 | Beenau et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7152045 | Hoffman | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7228155 | Saunders | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7312707 | Bishop et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7316032 | Tayebi et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333001 | Lane et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333479 | Jalkanen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7382255 | Chung | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7494055 | Fernandes et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7542942 | Peart et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565542 | Silverbrook et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20040134994 | Zaba et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050108044 | Koster | May 2005 | A1 |
20060174136 | Lyons et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080165005 | Burbridge et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090085724 | Naressi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1422658 | May 2004 | EP |
2006037202 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060282904 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |