This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/662,829 filed Mar. 18, 2005, which describes an improvement over U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/782,708 filed Feb. 17, 2004 claiming the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/464,423 filed Apr. 22, 2003, the entire file wrapper contents of which applications are herein incorporated by reference as though set forth at length.
This application relates generally to the field of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and in particular to improved MEMS devices that do not require additional current limiting devices.
Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) are small, movable, mechanical structures built using well-characterized, semi-conductor processes. Advantageously, MEMS can be provided as actuators, which have proven to be very useful in many applications.
Present-day MEMS actuators quite small, having a length of only a few hundred microns, and a width of only a few tens of microns. Such MEMS actuators are typically configured and disposed in a cantilever fashion. In other words, they have an end attached to a substrate and an opposite free end which is movable between at least two positions, one being a neutral position and the others being deflected positions.
Electrostatic, magnetic, piezo and thermal actuation mechanisms are among the most common actuation mechanisms employed MEMS. Of particular importance is the thermal actuation mechanism.
As is understood by those skilled in the art, the deflection of a thermal MEMS actuator results from a potential being applied between a pair of terminals, called “anchor pads”, which potential causes a current flow elevating the temperature of the structure. This elevated temperature ultimately causes a part thereof to contract or elongate, depending on the material being used.
One possible use for MEMS actuators is to configure them as switches. These switches are made of at least one actuator. In the case of multiple actuators, they are typically operated in sequence so as to connect or release one of their parts to a similar part on the other. These actuators form a switch which can be selectively opened or closed using a control voltage applied between corresponding anchor pads on each actuator.
MEMS switches have many advantages. Among other things, they are very small and relatively inexpensive—depending on the configuration. Because they are extremely small, a very large number of MEMS switches can be provided on a single wafer.
Of further advantage, MEMS switches consume minimal electrical power and their response time(s) are extremely short. Impressively, a complete cycle of closing or opening a MEMS switch can be as short as a few milliseconds.
Although prior-art MEMS actuators and switches have proven to be satisfactory to some degree, there nevertheless remains a general need to further improve their performance, reliability and manufacturability. For instance, one factor which generally increases the overall costs of a system using MEMS switches is the inclusion of any additional protection that is oftentimes required in particular markets.
One such type of additional protection that raises the cost of a MEMS based system is a current limiter device. These current limiters are external devices that protect each MEMS switch from being damaged by a relatively large current peak occurring in one of the circuits. Such current peaks—while usually brief in length—can damage unprotected MEMS switches. Eliminating the need for numerous current limiters in MEMS based systems would significantly decrease the overall costs of these systems and represent a significant advance in the art.
We have developed improved MEMS structures employing movable conductive member and a number of current-carrying stationary contact terminals which advantageously permits higher current carrying capability that prior art devices in which currents flowed through movable conductive members. Advantageously, and in sharp contrast to the prior art, our inventive structures may carry currents in excess of 1.0 amp without the need for additional current limiting devices. Consequently, systems employing our inventive structures exhibit significantly lower overall system manufacturing costs.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be realized by reference to the accompanying drawing in which:
a and 2b are side views of actuators employed by the MEMS switch of
a-3e show schematically an example of the relative movement of the MEMS actuators of
a shows a schematic of yet another alternate embodiment of the exemplary MEMS switch of
a-13e show the sequence of operation of the MEMS switch of
a-15e show the sequence of operation of the MEMS switch of
When the MEMS switch (100) is in a closed position, the contact terminals (102, 104) are in electrical engagement—that is to say an electrical current may flow between the two contact terminals (102,104). This electrical engagement is realized when the movable conductive member (106) electrically “shorts” the pair of contact terminals (102,104).
Conversely, when the MEMS switch (100) is in an open position, the contact terminals (102, 104) are not electrically engaged and no appreciable electrical current flows between them. In preferred embodiments, the movable conductive member (106) is gold plated.
We have discovered that that using contact terminals (102, 104) such as those shown and a movable conductive member (106) allows the conducting of higher currents than MEMS devices in which an electrical conducting path goes along a length of the MEMS actuators (10, 10′) themselves. Advantageously, and as a direct result of our inventive MEMS structure (100), it is now possible to employ MEMS switches while—at the same time—avoid using current limiters. As a result, overall manufacturing costs of systems employing MEMS switches may be significantly reduced.
Turning our attention now to
Referring back to
In each actuator (10, 10′), the spaced-apart portions (22, 22′) are substantially parallel and connected together at a common end (26, 26′) that is shown opposite the anchor pads (24, 24′) and overlying the substrate (12).
Each of the actuators (10, 10′) also comprises an elongated cold arm member (30, 30′) adjacent and substantially parallel to the corresponding hot arm member (20, 20′). The cold arm member (30, 30′) has, at one end, an anchor pad (32, 32′) connected to the substrate (12) and a free end (34, 34′) that is shown opposite the anchor pad thereof (32, 32′). The free end (34, 34′) is overlying the substrate (12).
A dielectric tether (40, 40′) is attached over the common end (26, 26′) of the portions (22, 22′) of the hot arm member (20, 20′) and over the free end (34, 34′) of the cold arm member (30, 30′). The dielectric tether (40, 40′) is provided to mechanically couple the hot arm member (20, 20′) and the cold arm member (30, 30′) and to keep them electrically independent, thereby maintaining them in a spaced-apart relationship with a minimum spacing between them to avoid a direct contact or a short circuit in normal operation as well as to maintain the required withstand voltage, which voltage is proportional to the spacing between the corresponding members (20, 30 and 20′, 30′).
It should be noted that maximum used voltage can be increased by changing of the ambient atmosphere. For instance, the use of high electro-negative gases as ambient atmosphere would increase the withstand voltage. One example of this type of gases is Sulfur Hexafluoride, SF6.
The dielectric tether (40, 40′) is preferably molded directly in place at the desired location and is attached by direct adhesion. Direct molding further allows having a small quantity of material entering the space between the parts before solidifying. Advantageously, the dielectric tether (40, 40′) may be attached to the hot arm member (20, 20′) and the cold arm member (30, 30′) in a different manner than the one shown in the figures. Moreover, the dielectric tethers (40, 40′) can be transparent as illustrated in some of the figures.
Each dielectric tether (40, 40′) is preferably made entirely of a photoresist material. It was found that a very suitable material for that purpose, which is also easy to manufacture, is the material known in the trade as “SU-8”. The SU-8 is a negative, epoxy-type, near-UV photo resist based on EPON SU-8 epoxy resin (from Shell Chemical). Of course, other photoresist may be used as well, depending upon the particular design requirements. Other possible suitable materials include polyimide, spin on glass, oxide, nitride, ORMOCORE™, ORMOCLAD™ or other polymers. Moreover, combining different materials is also possible and well within the scope of the present invention. As can be appreciated, providing each dielectric tether (40, 40′) over the corresponding actuator (10, 10′) is advantageous because it allows using the above-mentioned materials, which in return provides more flexibility on the tether material and a greater reliability.
In use, when a control voltage is applied at the anchor pads (24, 24′) of the hot arm member (20, 20′), a current travels into the first and second portions (22, 22′). In the various embodiments illustrated herein, the material(s) comprising the hot arm members (20, 20′) is a substantially conductive material selected so that it increases in length as it is heated. The cold arm members (30, 30′), however, do not substantially exhibit such elongation since no current is initially passing through them. The result of this arrangement is that when a control voltage is applied at the anchor pads (24, 24′), the resulting current flow in the hot arm members (20, 20′) results in their heating, and the free end of each actuator (10, 10′) is deflected sideward because of the asymmetrical configuration of the parts, thereby moving the actuators (10, 10′) from a neutral position to a deflected position. Conversely, removing the control voltage from the anchor pads (24, 24′) results in the cooling of the hot arm member (20, 20′) thereby causing it to move to its original position. Advantageously, both movements (from neutral to deflected and deflected back to neutral) occur very rapidly.
Preferably, each cold arm member (30, 30′) comprises a narrower section (36, 36′) adjacent to its anchor pad (32, 32′) in order to facilitate the movement between the neutral position and the deflected position. Each narrower section (36, 36′) has a width laterally decreased from the exterior compared to a wider section (38, 38′) of the cold arm member (30, 30′). In the preferred embodiment, the width decrease is at a square angle. As can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, other shapes are possible as well.
Each of the actuators (10, 10′) in the embodiment shown in
It is advantageous to provide at least one of these additional dielectric tethers (50, 50′) on each actuator (10, 10′) so as to provide additional strength to the hot arm member (20, 20′) by reducing their effective length, thereby preventing distortion of the hot arm member (20, 20′) over time. Since the gap between the parts is extremely small, the additional tethers (50, 50′) reduce any risk of a short circuit between the two portions (22, 22′) of the hot arm member (20, 20′) or between the portion (22, 22′) of the hot arm member (20, 20′) which is physically the closest to the cold arm member (30, 30′) and the cold arm member (30, 30′) itself by keeping them in a spaced-apart configuration.
Additionally, since the cold arm member (30, 30′) can be used to carry high voltage signals in some configurations, the portion (22, 22′) of the hot arm member (20, 20′) closest to the cold arm member (30, 30′) may deform, thereby moving closer towards the cold arm member (30, 30′) due to the electrostatic force between them created by the high voltage signal. If the portion (22, 22′) of the hot arm member (20, 20′) gets too close to the cold arm member (30, 30′), a voltage breakdown can occur, destroying the MEMS switch (100). Finally, since the two portions (22, 22′) of the hot arm member (20, 20′) are relatively long, they tend to distort when heated to create the deflection, thereby decreasing the effective stroke of the actuators (10, 10′).
As can be appreciated, using one, two or more additional dielectric tethers (50, 50′) has many advantages, including increasing the rigidity of the portions (22, 22′) of the hot arm member (20, 20′), increasing the stroke of the actuators (10, 10′), decreasing the risks of shorts between the portions (22, 22′) of the hot arm members (20, 20′) and increasing the breakdown voltage between the cold arm members (30, 30′) and hot arm members (20, 20′).
The additional dielectric tethers (50, 50′) are preferably made of a material identical or similar to that of the main dielectric tethers (40, 40′). Small quantities of materials are advantageously allowed to flow between the parts before solidifying in order to improve the adhesion. In addition, one or more holes or passageways (not shown) can be provided in the cold arm members (30, 30′) to receive a small quantity of material before it solidifies to ensure a better adhesion.
The additional tethers (50, 50′) are preferably provided at enlarge points (22a, 22a′) along the length of each actuator (10, 10′). These enlarged points (22a, 22a′) offer a greater contact surface and also contribute to dissipate more heat when a current flows therein. Providing a larger surface and allowing more heat to be dissipated increase the actuator life time
Continuing with our discussion of
Turning our attention now to
a through 3e schematically show an example of the relative movement of the MEMS actuators (10, 10′) when the MEMS switch (100) goes from an “open position” to a “closed position”, thereby closing the circuit between the two contact terminals (102, 104). To move from one position to the other, the actuators (10, 10′) are operated in sequence.
More particularly,
d shows the control voltage in the second actuator (10′) being released, which causes its flange (62′) to engage the back side of the flange (62) of the first actuator (10) as it returns towards its neutral position. Then, in
As can be seen, the movable conductive member (106) is moved, in
In addition, this angular offset also prevents the actuator (10) from moving away from its original position after many cycles—as a result of fatigue. Without the angle on the hot arm member (20) the gap between the movable contact member (106) and the contact terminals (102, 104) may gradually increase over time with repeated cycling. As can be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, this angle provides a greater lateral stability to the actuator (10).
Preferably, the support arm (108) is made integral with the cold arm member (30) and is designed with a rigid base portion and a spring-like portion somewhat symmetrically disposed around a central axis extending towards and between the contact terminals (102, 104).
In
a to 13e show the sequence of operation of the MEMS switch (100) of
c shows the position of the movable conductive member (106′), with reference to one of the contact terminal (104′) once the second actuator (10′) is powered. Then, the voltage in the first actuator is released so that the first actuator is forced to return to its initial position. The movable conductive member (106′) will move downwards until it makes contact with the contact terminal (104′). Finally, the voltage is released from the second actuator and the free end of the second actuator will be forced to return towards its initial position at the left. This will maintain a force between the contact terminal (104′) and the movable conductive member (106′). It should be noted that all this procedure is occurring in an extremely short time and that it can be reversed by reversing the above-mentioned steps.
As can be seen in
As can be appreciated, the various configurations of the MEMS switch (100) disclosed herein can be designed to withstand a relatively large current between the contact terminals. Advantageously, this current may be in excess of one ampere, possibly even more. Therefore, current limiters may be omitted from the system design using this MEMS switch configuration. Typically, each actuator (10, 10′) is activated with a current between 50 to 200 mA. Other values are also possible.
It is understood that the above-described embodiments are illustrative of only a few of the possible specific embodiments which can represent applications of the invention. Numerous and various other arrangements and materials may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Accordingly, our invention should only be limited by the scope of the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6124650 | Bishop et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6407478 | Wood et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433657 | Chen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7548145 | Rubel | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7602266 | Menard et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7724121 | Rubel | May 2010 | B2 |
7760065 | Gasparyan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20030025580 | Wheeler et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050189204 | Yeatman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070188846 | Slicker et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090085699 | Aksyuk et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1426992 | Aug 2002 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060238279 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60662829 | Mar 2005 | US |