This invention relates generally to radio frequency (RF) transceiver/sensor systems, and, more specifically, to efficient broadband RF transceiver/sensor systems incorporating micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) components.
Radio/microwave frequency transceiving systems typically rely on superheterodyne architectures to couple high frequency signals from an antenna to a baseband processor. Such architectures typically have standard design features which may include antennas, amplifiers, mixers, oscillators and filters. With the ever-decreasing size of modern communications platforms, space for the circuitry footprints for these components is at a premium. However, previous methodologies for reducing the complexity of superheterodyne transceiving systems have achieved less than optimal results.
Direct conversion transceivers commonly suffer from energy leak from their local oscillators through the mixer to the antenna, thereby resulting in DC offset errors. Additionally, after a period of time, direct conversion transceivers may become unstable due to frequency drift of the local oscillator.
In superheterodyne systems, all signal frequencies are typically converted to a constant intermediate frequency (IF). As such, filters are heavily relied upon to channelize bands of operation and reject interference. Filters typically comprise a large portion of the overall volume of a device. Also, current filters are not amenable to monolithic fabrication and require costly touch labor as they are manufactured from multiple distinct components. Surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters are inherently narrow-band, lossy, have poor group delay response, and are not amenable to monolithic integration. Varactor-based filters typically have high losses, modest intermodulation performance, limited tuning ranges and complex biasing requirements.
Efficient radios architectures also rely on highly linear, low loss switches to select between channels. However, many common switching mechanisms may have high insertion losses, and isolation and linearity characteristics which are less than optimal. Field effect transistor (FET) based semiconductor switches are lossy, exhibit poor isolation, and are prone to intermodulation.
As a result, the demand for ever more flexible, sophisticated, lightweight and low-power transceiver/sensor systems has resulted in the emergence of micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) technologies. MEMS are the integration of mechanical elements, sensors, actuators, and electronics on a common silicon substrate through microfabrication technology. While the electronics are fabricated using integrated circuit process sequences (e.g., CMOS, Bipolar, or BICMOS processes), the micromechanical components are fabricated using compatible “micromachining” processes that selectively etch away parts of the silicon wafer or add new structural layers to form the mechanical and electromechanical devices. A brief summary of current MEMS technology and future MEMS development potential may be found in “MEMS for RF/Microwave Wireless Applications: The Next Wave” by Randy J. Richards and Hector J. De Los Santos, Microwave Journal, March 2001 & July 2001, herein incorporated by reference.
MEMS technologies are reaching a point of maturity where filter resonators and switches can be fabricated monolithically and in high density while retaining performance characteristics approaching traditional filter technologies.
Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a MEMS-based broadband transceiver and sensor system.
Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a MEMS-based broadband transceiver/sensor system.
In an embodiment of the invention a broadband transceiver may comprise: (i) a MEMS-based triplexer; (ii) a local oscillator; (iii) a mixer; (iv) a first N:1 MEMS-based switch; (v) a plurality of N MEMS-based variable bandwidth bandpass filters; and (vi) a second N:1 MEMS-based switch.
In a further embodiment of the inventions, an RF energy sensor may comprise: (a) a plurality of M MEMS-based triplexers; (b) an M:1 MEMS-based switch; (c) a local oscillator; (d) a mixer; (e) a surface acoustic wave (SAW) filter; (f) an amplifier; and (g) an array of MEMS-based filters.
In still a further embodiment of the invention, a MEMS-based transceiver/sensor system may comprise: (a) an antenna; (b) a front-end triplexer block; (c) a plurality of transceiving channels; and (d) an RF energy sensor.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention claimed. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate an embodiment of the invention and together with the general description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The numerous objects and advantages of the present invention may be better understood by those skilled in the art by reference to the accompanying figures in which:
a and 6b depict a high-frequency, MEMS based filter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
a depicts a dielectrically transduced MEMS resonator in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
b depicts a circuit schematic for a MEMS-based variable IF filter comprising dielectrically transduced MEMS resonators in a ladder/lattice configuration in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
The following discussion is presented to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the present teachings. Various modifications to the illustrated embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the present teachings. Thus, the present teachings are not intended to be limited to embodiments shown, but are to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein. The following detailed description is to be read with reference to the figures, in which like elements in different figures have like reference numerals. The figures, which are not necessarily to scale, depict selected embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings. Skilled artisans will recognize the examples provided herein have many useful alternatives and fall within the scope of the present teachings.
Reference will now be made, in detail, to presently preferred embodiments of the invention. Additional details of the invention are provided in the examples illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The topology of each filter 103 may be a bandpass structure. Filter constructions for the MEMS-based filters 103 may vary according to desired operational frequencies.
At low frequencies (20-145 MHz), commercial-of-the-shelf (COTS) high-Q lumped inductors and capacitors may be used in combination with MEMS switches to create a high pass/low pass, tunable, fixed-frequency topology. Referring to
At medium frequencies (145-1200 MHz), a single COTS lumped inductor is resonated with MEMS based vertical capacitors (VCaps). Referring to
At high frequencies (1200-6000 MHz), a cavity-isolated, constant bandwidth, tunable filter may be incorporated. A tunable comb-line structure is resonated with MEMS-based capacitors and switches. Referring to
The individual MEMS-based filters 103 within the triplexer filter block 102 are sufficiently separated in frequency to prevent degradation in the performance of each individual filter response. In further embodiments of the present invention, the center frequencies of the each of the MEMS-based filters 103a, 103b, and 103c may be:
a) 17-26 MHz, 131-195 MHz, and 0.989-1.481 GHz;
b) 27-39 MHz, 196-293 MHz, and 1.482-2.222 GHz;
c) 40-58 MHz, 294-440 MHz, and 2.223-3.334 GHz;
d) 59-87 MHz, 441-659 MHz, and 3.335-5.000 GHz; or
e) 88-130 MHz, 670-988 MHz, and 5.001-7.500 GHz, respectively.
In still a further embodiment, the center frequencies of each of the MEMS-based filters 103a, 103b, and 103c may be:
a) 20 MHz, 156 MHz, and 1.185 GHz;
b) 31 MHz, 234 MHz, and 1.777 GHz;
c) 46 MHz, 351 MHz, and 2667 GHz;
d) 69 MHz, 526 MHz, and 4.000 GHz; or
e) 104 MHz, 790 MHz, and 6.000 GHz, respectively.
This frequency separation permits the outputs of the three filters 103 to be recombined into a single signal 104 thereby eliminating the need for input and output multiplexing MEMS switches. The recombination also allows for the use of a single broadband, low noise amplifier 105 so as to reduce overall power dissipation.
Referring again to
The IF signal 108 may then be routed through one of N variable-bandwidth MEMS filters in an IF filter array 109. The individual variable bandwidth filters of the MEMS filter array 109 may be configured to further separate incremental segments of the IF 108. Each variable bandwidth filter may be configured such that each filter accounts for an equal portion of the IF range. In an embodiment of the invention, each of five filters in the filter array 109 may have a bandwidth of 5 MHz wide to cover a total of 25 MHz. The MEMS-based variable IF filters of the MEMS filter array 109 may comprise dielectrically transduced, silicon-thickness, shear mode, bar resonators in a ladder configuration. This filter structure provides both variable bandwidth and center frequency (over a limited range). Referring to
In still a further embodiment of the invention, the MEMS filters of the triplexer 102 and the filter array 109 may comprise MEMS mechanical resonators in combination with analog amplifiers. The MEMS resonators may be selected from the group comprising vertical displacement resonators and film bulk acoustic wave resonators, depending on resonance frequency, selectivity, and Q requirements.
The IF signal 108 may be routed to a specific variable bandwidth MEMS filter in the IF filter block 109 using a first N:1 MEMS switch 110 and a second N:1 MEMS switch 111. In a further embodiment of the invention N is equal to five (5). The MEMS switches in MEMS switch blocks 110 and 111 may have insertion losses of less than 0.25 dB and a lifetime of from 50 billion to 100 billion cycles. Such switches include the SPST brand of switches manufactured by Radant MEMS. The MEMS switches 110 and 111 may be selected from cantilever, membrane, shape-memory alloy, and multi-pole/multi-throw-type switches. The actuation mechanisms for these switch-types may include electrostatic, piezoelectric, thermal, magnetic, and bi-metallic mechanisms. Possible contact mechanisms for the MEMS switch may include metal-to-metal contact and capacitively-coupled switches.
The output frequency 112 from the MEMS filter array 109 may be directed to an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 113 for further signal processing.
Referring to
a) 17-26 MHz, 131-195 MHz, and 0.989-1.481 GHz;
b) 27-39 MHz, 196-293 MHz, and 1.482-2.222 GHz;
c) 40-58 MHz, 294-440 MHz, and 2.223-3.334 GHz;
d) 59-87 MHz, 441-659 MHz, and 3.335-5.000 GHz; and
e) 88-130 MHz, 670-988 MHz, and 5.001-7.500 GHz, respectively.
In still a further embodiment, the center frequencies of the respective MEMS-based filters 203 of each triplexer 202 in a five-triplexer array may be:
a) 20 MHz, 156 MHz, and 1.185 GHz;
b) 31 MHz, 234 MHz, and 1.777 GHz;
c) 46 MHz, 351 MHz, and 2667 GHz;
d) 69 MHz, 526 MHz, and 4.000 GHz; and
e) 104 MHz, 790 MHz, and 6.000 GHz, respectively.
The topology of each filter of the triplexers 203 may be a bandpass structure. At low frequencies (20-145 MHz), commercial-of-the-shelf (COTS) lumped inductors and capacitors may be used in a high pass/low pass, fixed frequency topology as presented in
The respective signals from each of the M triplexers 202 may be routed to an MEMS-based M:1 switch 204. The MEMS switch 204 may be capable of selecting a particular triplexer 202 signal for further processing. In a further embodiment of the invention, M is equal to five (5). The MEMS switch 204 may have insertion losses of less than 0.25 dB and a lifetime of from 50 billion to 100 billion cycles. Such switches include the SPST brand of switches manufactured by Radant MEMS. The MEMS switch 204 may be selected from cantilever, membrane, shape-memory alloy, and multi-pole/multi-throw-type switches. The actuation mechanisms for these switch-types may include electrostatic, piezoelectric, thermal, magnetic, and bi-metallic mechanisms. Possible contact mechanisms for the MEMS switch may include metal-to-metal contact and capacitively-coupled switches.
The sensor 200 may also include a local oscillator 205 and a mixer 206 to mix the filtered frequencies 104 to a desired intermediate frequency (IF) signal 207. The IF signal 207 may be routed to a secondary filter 208. The secondary filter 208 may be a SAW or MEMS-based filter. The output of the secondary filter 208 may, in turn, be routed to a broadband, low-noise amplifier 209 for further signal enhancement.
The output of the amplifier 209 may be routed to an array 210 of MEMS-based filters 211. Each of the MEMS filters 211 in the filter array 210 may be configured so as to segregate a specific portion of the overall IF signal 207 frequency range for the signal received by the antenna 201. As such, the filter array 210 may be used to conduct frequency dependent amplitude detection via filter outputs 212. The filter outputs 212 may be routed to a series of analog-to-digital controllers (not shown) for further signal processing. In an embodiment of the invention, the frequency range for the signal received by the antenna 201 is between 20 MHz and 6.0 GHz.
The MEMS-based variable IF filters 211 of the filter array 210 may comprise dielectrically transduced silicon thickness shear mode bar resonators in a ladder configuration as presented in
In a further embodiment of the invention, the MEMS filters 211 of the filter array 210 may comprise MEMS mechanical resonators in combination with analog amplifiers. The MEMS resonators may be selected from the group comprising vertical displacement resonators and film bulk acoustic wave resonators, depending on resonance frequency, selectivity, and Q requirements.
Referring to
The output 303 from the triplexer 304 of each of the M transceiving channels 301 may be routed to a MEMS-based M:1 switch 305 of the RF energy sensor 302. Such a configuration eliminates the need for duplicate triplexer blocks for the transceiving channels 301 and the RF energy sensor 302 thereby further reducing the complexity of a transceiver/sensor 300 system.
It is believed that the present invention and many of its attendant advantages will be understood from the foregoing description, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction, and arrangement of the components thereof without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention or without sacrificing all of its material advantages. The form herein before described being merely an explanatory embodiment thereof, it is the intention of the following claims to encompass and include such changes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4109202 | Kudsia et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 5247700 | Wohl et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5864265 | Ballance et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864672 | Bodeep et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 6346912 | Reinhart et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6671519 | Jeon et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6674967 | Skrobko et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6801767 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6885336 | Forrester | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7075412 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7098862 | Regala | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7239853 | Kearns | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7263072 | Martinez | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7307494 | Erb | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7376446 | Licht | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7388435 | Neenan et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7397324 | Tang et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7420438 | Nakai et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7447439 | O'Donnell et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7466990 | Mellor et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7495528 | Fukunaga | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7564420 | Jeon et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7567130 | Neenan et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 20010044292 | Jeon et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020132644 | Mellor et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030090320 | Skrobko et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20050136876 | Broholm | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050195038 | Neenan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249504 | O'Donnell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060067254 | Mahbub et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060267707 | Tang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070116465 | Bieker | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080205897 | Neenan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080298298 | Eom et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090231058 | Nishino et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090232008 | Wurst et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090279896 | Hufstedler et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090285579 | Neenan et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090286569 | Rousu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |