Patent Grant
8356885
The present invention relates to inkjet printers and in particular, inkjet printheads that generate vapor bubbles to eject droplets of ink.
The following applications have been filed by the Applicant simultaneously with application U.S. Ser. No. 11/097,309:
The disclosures of these co-pending applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The following patents or patent applications filed by the applicant or assignee of the present invention are hereby incorporated by cross-reference.
The present invention involves the ejection of ink drops by way of forming gas or vapor bubbles in a bubble forming liquid. This principle is generally described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,747,120 to Stemme.
There are various known types of thermal ink jet (bubblejet) printhead devices. Two typical devices of this type, one made by Hewlett Packard and the other by Canon, have ink ejection nozzles and chambers for storing ink adjacent the nozzles. Each chamber is covered by a so-called nozzle plate, which is a separately fabricated item and which is mechanically secured to the walls of the chamber. In certain prior art devices, the top plate is made of Kapton™ which is a Dupont trade name for a polyimide film, which has been laser-drilled to form the nozzles. These devices also include heater elements in thermal contact with ink that is disposed adjacent the nozzles, for heating the ink thereby forming gas bubbles in the ink. The gas bubbles generate pressures in the ink causing ink drops to be ejected through the nozzles.
Before printing, the chambers need to be primed with ink. During operation, the chambers may deprime. If the chamber is not primed the nozzle will not eject ink. Thus it is useful to detect the presence or absence of ink in the chambers. However, the microscopic scale of the chambers and nozzles makes the incorporation of sensors difficult and adds extra complexity to the fabrication process.
The resistive heaters operate in an extremely harsh environment. They must heat and cool in rapid succession to form bubbles in the ejectable liquid, usually a water soluble ink. These conditions are highly conducive to the oxidation and corrosion of the heater material. Dissolved oxygen in the ink can attack the heater surface and oxidise the heater material. In extreme circumstances, the heaters ‘burn out’ whereby complete oxidation of parts of the heater breaks the heating circuit.
The heater can also be eroded by ‘cavitation’ caused by the severe hydraulic forces associated with the surface tension of a collapsing bubble.
To protect against the effects of oxidation, corrosion and cavitation on the heater material, inkjet manufacturers use stacked protective layers, typically made from Si3N4, SiC and Ta. In certain prior art devices, the protective layers are relatively thick. U.S. Pat. No. 6,786,575 to Anderson et al (assigned to Lexmark) for example, has 0.7 μm of protective layers for a ˜0.1 μm thick heater.
To form a vapor bubble in the bubble forming liquid, the surface of the protective layers in contact with the bubble forming liquid must be heated to the superheat limit of the liquid (˜300° C. for water). This requires that the heater and the entire thickness of its protective layers be heated to 300° C. If the protective layers are much thicker than the heater, they will absorb a lot more heat. If this heat cannot be dissipated between successive firings of the nozzle, the ink in the nozzles will boil continuously and the nozzles will stop ejecting. Consequently, the heat absorbed by the protective layers limits the density of the nozzles on the printhead and the nozzle firing rate. This in turn has an impact on the print resolution, the printhead size, the print speed and the manufacturing costs.
Attempts to increase nozzle density and firing rate are hindered by limitations on thermal conduction out of the printhead integrated circuit (chip), which is currently the primary cooling mechanism of printheads on the market. Existing printheads on the market require a large heat sink to dissipate heat absorbed from the printhead IC.
Inkjet printheads can also suffer from nozzle clogging from dried ink. During periods of inactivity, evaporation of the volatile component of the bubble forming liquid will occur at the liquid-air interface in the nozzle. This will decrease the concentration of the volatile component in the liquid near the heater and increase the viscosity of the liquid in the chamber. The decrease in concentration of the volatile component will result in the production of less vapor in the bubble, so the bubble impulse (pressure integrated over area and time) will be reduced: this will decrease the momentum of ink forced through the nozzle and the likelihood of drop break-off The increase in viscosity will also decrease the momentum of ink forced through the nozzle and increase the critical wavelength for the Rayleigh Taylor instability governing drop break-off, decreasing the likelihood of drop break-off. If the nozzle is left idle for too long, the nozzle is unable to eject the liquid in the chamber. Hence each nozzle has a maximum time that it can remain unfired before evaporation will clog the nozzle.
The present invention aims to overcome or ameliorate some of the problems of the prior art, or at least provide a useful alternative.
According to a first aspect, the present invention provides an inkjet printhead comprising:
Removing most or all of the protective coatings from the heater reduces or eliminates the thermal insulation between the heater and the ink. The energy required to heat any protective coating scales directly with the coating thickness. Diffusive loss of energy into the ink and supporting underlayer (if any) prior to bubble nucleation is also significantly reduced by thinning or removing any protective coatings. Nucleating a bubble in the ink chamber requires a much shorter pulse of less energy thereby improving printhead efficiency.
Without thick protective layers, cavitation corrosion and oxidation need to be controlled and options for achieving this are discussed in the Detail Description of the Preferred Embodiments.
Preferably the heater element has no protective surface coating. In some embodiments, the heater element forms a self passivating surface oxide layer.
Optionally, the heater has a surface area between 80 μm2 and 120 μm2. In some forms, the heater element thickness is between 0.8 μm to 1.2 μm. Preferably, the drop of the ejectable liquid ejected from the nozzle is between 1 pl and 2 pl. Preferably, each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 500 nanojoules (nJ) to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop. In some embodiments, the actuation energy is less than 200 nJ. In particularly preferred embodiments, the actuation energy is less than 80 nJ.
In a first aspect there is provided a fluid sensor for detecting fluid in a device having a fluid chamber, the sensor comprising:
Optionally the MEMS sensing element is a beam structure that is suspended in the flow path of the fluid.
Optionally the device is an inkjet printhead and the fluid chamber is an ink chamber with an ink inlet and an ejection nozzle, such that the beam structure extends into the chamber for immersion in ink when the printhead is primed.
Optionally the beam structure is a heater element for raising the temperature of part of the ink above its boiling point to form a vapor bubble that causes a drop of ink to be ejected through the nozzle.
Optionally the bubble generated by the heater subsequently collapses to a bubble collapse point, and the heater element is shaped in a topologically open or closed loop such that the bubble collapse point is spaced from the heater element.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 500 nanojoules (nJ) to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 200 nJ to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 80 nJ to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
In a second aspect there is provided an inkjet printhead comprising:
Optionally the heater element has no protective surface coating.
Optionally the heater element forms a self passivating surface oxide layer.
Optionally the heater element has a surface area between 80 μm2 and 120 μm2.
Optionally the heater element thickness is between 0.8 μm to 1.2 μm.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 500 nanojoules (nJ) to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
Optionally the actuation energy is less than 200 nJ.
Optionally the actuation energy is less than 80 nJ.
In a third aspect the present invention provides an inkjet printhead for printing onto a media substrate, the printhead comprising:
Optionally the print engine controller is programmed such that any drops of the ejectable liquid ejected solely to ensure that the time interval between successive actuations is less than the decap time, do not print onto the media substrate being printed.
Optionally the media substrate is a series of separate pages that are fed passed the nozzles wherein, the drops of the ejectable liquid ejected solely to ensure that the time interval between successive actuations is less than the predetermined time, are ejected into gaps between successive pages as they are fed passed the nozzles.
Optionally the heater element is configured for receiving an energizing pulse to form the bubble, the energizing pulse having duration less than 1.5 μs.
Optionally the bubble formed by the heater element subsequently collapses to a bubble collapse point, and the heater element is shaped in a topologically open or closed loop such that the bubble collapse point is spaced from the heater element.
Optionally each of the heater elements has an actuation energy that is less than the maximum amount of thermal energy that can be removed by the drop, being the energy required to heat a volume of the ejectable liquid equivalent to the drop volume from the temperature at which the liquid enters the printhead to the heterogeneous boiling point of the ejectable liquid.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 500 nanojoules (nJ) to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 200 nJ to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
In a fourth aspect the present invention provides an inkjet printhead comprising:
Optionally the additive is aluminium.
Optionally the additive is chromium.
Optionally the self passivating transition metal nitride is TiAlN.
Optionally the inkjet printhead further comprising control circuitry for driving the heater elements with a driver voltage of approximately 3.3 Volts, wherein the self passivating transition metal nitride has a resistivity between 15 μOhm·m to 8 μOhm·m.
Optionally the inkjet printhead further comprising control circuitry for driving the heater elements with a driver voltage of approximately 5 Volts, wherein the self passivating transition metal nitride has a resistivity between 1.5 μOhm·m to 30 μOhm·m.
Optionally the inkjet printhead further comprising control circuitry for driving the heater elements with a driver voltage of approximately 12 Volts, wherein the self passivating transition metal nitride has a resistivity between 6 μOhm·m to 150 μOhm·m.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 500 nanojoules (nJ) to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
In a fifth aspect the present invention provides an inkjet printhead comprising:
Optionally the dielectric layer is less than 1 μm from the side of the heater element bonded to the chamber.
Optionally the dielectric layer is bonded directly to the side of the heater element.
Optionally the dielectric layer is deposited with CVD.
Optionally the dielectric layer is spun on.
Optionally the dielectric layer is a form of SiOC or SiOCH.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 500 nanojoules (nJ) to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 200 nJ to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
In a sixth aspect the present invention provides an inkjet printhead comprising:
Optionally the nanocrystalline composite has one or more nanocrystalline phases embedded in an amorphous phase.
Optionally at least one of the nanocrystalline phases is a transition metal nitride, a transition metal silicide, a transition metal boride or a transition metal carbide.
Optionally the amorphous phase is non-metallic.
Optionally the amorphous phase is a nitride, a carbide, carbon or an oxide.
Optionally the nitride is:
the carbide is:
the oxide is;
Optionally the transition metal is one of Ti, Ta, W, Ni, Zr, Cr, Hf, V, Nb, or Mo.
Optionally the heater element is formed from TiAlSiN.
In a seventh aspect the present invention provides an inkjet printhead comprising:
Optionally the energizing pulse has a duration less than 1.0 μs.
Optionally the voltage applied to the heater element during the energizing pulse is between 5V and 12V.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 500 nanojoules (nJ) to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
Optionally the actuation energy is less than 200 nJ.
Optionally the actuation energy is less than 80 nJ.
Optionally the bubble formed by the heater element subsequently collapses to a bubble collapse point, and the heater element is shaped in a topologically open or closed loop such that the bubble collapse point is spaced from the heater element.
Optionally the heater element is generally planar and suspended in the bubble forming chamber such that the bubble forms on opposing sides of the heater element.
In an eighth aspect the present invention provides an inkjet printhead comprising:
Optionally the heater element is configured such that the energy required to generate the drop is less than the capacity of the drop to remove energy from the printhead.
Optionally the planar surface area is less than 225 μm2.
Optionally the planar surface area is less than 150 μm2.
Optionally the drop is less than 5 pico-litres (pl).
Optionally the drop is between 1 pl and 2 pl.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 500 nanojoules (nJ) to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
Optionally each heater element requires an actuation energy of less than 200 nJ to heat that heater element sufficiently to form said bubble causing the ejection of said drop.
In a ninth aspect the present invention provides an inkjet printhead comprising:
Optionally the heater is separated from the nozzle by less than 3 nm at their closest points.
Optionally the nozzle length is less than 3 nm.
Optionally the ejectable liquid has a viscosity less than 3 cP.
Optionally the heater element configured such that the energy required to generate the drop is less than the capacity of the drop to remove energy from the printhead.
Optionally the drop is less than 5 pico-litres (pl) and the energy required to generate the drop is less than 500 nJ.
Optionally the drop is between 1 pl and 2 pl and the energy required to generate the drop is less than 220 nJ.
Optionally the drop is less than 1 pl and the energy required to generate the drop is less than 80 nJ.
In a further aspect there is provided an inkjet printhead further comprising a MEMS fluid sensor for detecting the presence or otherwise of the ejectable liquid in the chamber, the MEMS fluid sensor having a MEMS sensing element formed of conductive material having a resistance that is a function of temperature, the MEMS sensing element having electrical contacts for connection to an electrical power source for heating the sensing element with an electrical signal; and
Optionally the heater element has a protective surface coating that is less than 0.1 μm thick.
In a further aspect there is provided an inkjet printhead further comprising a print engine controller to control the ejection of drops from each of the nozzles such that it actuates any one of the heaters to eject a keep-wet drop if the interval between successive actuations of that heater reaches a predetermined maximum; wherein during use,
Optionally the heater element is formed from a self passivating transition metal nitride.
Optionally the heater element is bonded on one side to the chamber so that the gas bubble forms on the other side which faces into the chamber, and the chamber has a dielectric layer proximate the side of the heater element bonded to the chamber; wherein the dielectric layer has a thermal product less than 1495 Jm−2K−1 S−1/2, the thermal product being (ρCk)1/2, where ρ is the density of the layer, C is specific heat of the layer and k is thermal conductivity of the layer.
Optionally the heater element is formed from a material with a nanocrystalline composite structure.
Optionally the heater element configured for receiving an energizing pulse to form the gas bubble that causes the ejection of a drop of the ejectable liquid from the nozzle; wherein during use, the energizing pulse has a duration less than 1.5 micro-seconds (μs) and the energy required to generate the drop is less than the capacity of the drop to remove energy from the printhead.
Optionally the planar surface area of the heater element is less than 300 μm2.
Optionally the heater element is separated from the nozzle by less than 5 μm at their closest points;
As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the ejection of a drop of the ejectable liquid as described herein, is caused by the generation of a vapor bubble in a bubble forming liquid, which, in embodiments, is the same body of liquid as the ejectable liquid. The generated bubble causes an increase in pressure in ejectable liquid, which forces the drop through the relevant nozzle. The bubble is generated by Joule heating of a heater element which is in thermal contact with the ink. The electrical pulse applied to the heater is of brief duration, typically less than 2 microseconds. Due to stored heat in the liquid, the bubble expands for a few microseconds after the heater pulse is turned off. As the vapor cools, it recondenses, resulting in bubble collapse. The bubble collapses to a point determined by the dynamic interplay of inertia and surface tension of the ink. In this specification, such a point is referred to as the “point of collapse” of the bubble.
Throughout this specification, ‘self passivation’ refers to the incorporation of an additive whose oxidation is thermodynamically favored above the other elements in the heater. The additive forms a surface oxide layer with a low diffusion coefficient for oxygen so as to provide a barrier to further oxidation. Accordingly, a ‘self passivating’ material has the ability to form such a surface oxide layer. The self passivating component need not be aluminium: any other additive whose oxidation is thermodynamically favored over the other components will form an oxide on the heater surface provided this oxide has a low oxygen diffusion rate (comparable to aluminium oxide), the additive will be a suitable alternative to aluminium.
Throughout the specification, references to ‘self cooled’ or ‘self cooling’ nozzles will be understood to be nozzles in which the energy required to eject a drop of the ejectable liquid is less than the maximum amount of thermal energy that can be removed by the drop, being the energy required to heat a volume of the ejectable fluid equivalent to the drop volume from the temperature at which the fluid enters the printhead to the heterogeneous boiling point of the ejectable fluid.
Throughout this specification, the ‘nozzle length’ refers to the distance, in the direction of droplet travel, of the sidewall defining a nozzle aperture, from the interior of the chamber to the external edge of the nozzle plate, or nozzle rim projecting from the nozzle plate. This dimension of the nozzle aperture influences the viscous drag on the ink drop as it is ejected from the chamber.
The printhead according to the invention comprises a plurality of nozzles, as well as a chamber and one or more heater elements corresponding to each nozzle. Each portion of the printhead pertaining to a single nozzle, its chamber and its one or more elements, is referred to herein as a “unit cell”.
In this specification, where reference is made to parts being in thermal contact with each other, this means that they are positioned relative to each other such that, when one of the parts is heated, it is capable of heating the other part, even though the parts, themselves, might not be in physical contact with each other.
Also, the term “ink” is used to signify any ejectable liquid, and is not limited to conventional inks containing colored dyes. Examples of non-colored inks include fixatives, infra-red absorber inks, functionalized chemicals, adhesives, biological fluids, water and other solvents, and so on. The ink or ejectable liquid also need not necessarily be a strictly a liquid, and may contain a suspension of solid particles or be solid at room temperature and liquid at the ejection temperature.
Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. The drawings are described as follows.
In the description than follows, corresponding reference numerals, or corresponding prefixes of reference numerals (i.e. the parts of the reference numerals appearing before a point mark) which are used in different figures relate to corresponding parts. Where there are corresponding prefixes and differing suffixes to the reference numerals, these indicate different specific embodiments of corresponding parts.
Overview of the Invention and General Discussion of Operation
With reference to
The printhead also includes, with respect to each nozzle 3, side walls 6 on which the nozzle plate is supported, a chamber 7 defined by the walls and the nozzle plate 2, a multi-layer substrate 8 and an inlet passage 9 extending through the multi-layer substrate to the far side (not shown) of the substrate. A looped, elongate heater element 10 is suspended within the chamber 7, so that the element is in the form of a suspended beam. The printhead as shown is a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) structure, which is formed by a lithographic process which is described in more detail below.
When the printhead is in use, ink 11 from a reservoir (not shown) enters the chamber 7 via the inlet passage 9, so that the chamber fills to the level as shown in
Turning briefly to
When the element 10 is heated as described above, the bubble 12 forms along the length of the element, this bubble appearing, in the cross-sectional view of
The bubble 12, once generated, causes an increase in pressure within the chamber 7, which in turn causes the ejection of a drop 16 of the ink 11 through the nozzle 3. The rim 4 assists in directing the drop 16 as it is ejected, so as to minimize the chance of drop misdirection.
The reason that there is only one nozzle 3 and chamber 7 per inlet passage 9 is so that the pressure wave generated within the chamber, on heating of the element 10 and forming of a bubble 12, does not affect adjacent chambers and their corresponding nozzles.
The advantages of the heater element 10 being suspended rather than embedded in any solid material, are discussed below. However, there are also advantages to bonding the heater element to the internal surfaces of the chamber. These are discussed below with reference to
The increase in pressure within the chamber 7 not only pushes ink 11 out through the nozzle 3, but also pushes some ink back through the inlet passage 9. However, the inlet passage 9 is approximately 200 to 300 microns in length, and is only about 16 microns in diameter. Hence there is a substantial inertia and viscous drag limiting back flow. As a result, the predominant effect of the pressure rise in the chamber 7 is to force ink out through the nozzle 3 as an ejected drop 16, rather than back through the inlet passage 9.
Turning now to
The collapsing of the bubble 12 towards the point of collapse 17 causes some ink 11 to be drawn from within the nozzle 3 (from the sides 18 of the drop), and some to be drawn from the inlet passage 9, towards the point of collapse. Most of the ink 11 drawn in this manner is drawn from the nozzle 3, forming an annular neck 19 at the base of the drop 16 prior to its breaking off.
The drop 16 requires a certain amount of momentum to overcome surface tension forces, in order to break off. As ink 11 is drawn from the nozzle 3 by the collapse of the bubble 12, the diameter of the neck 19 reduces thereby reducing the amount of total surface tension holding the drop, so that the momentum of the drop as it is ejected out of the nozzle is sufficient to allow the drop to break off.
When the drop 16 breaks off, cavitation forces are caused as reflected by the arrows 20, as the bubble 12 collapses to the point of collapse 17. It will be noted that there are no solid surfaces in the vicinity of the point of collapse 17 on which the cavitation can have an effect.
Manufacturing Process
Relevant parts of the manufacturing process of a printhead according to embodiments of the invention are now described with reference to
Referring to
Guard rings 26 are formed in the metallization of the interconnect layers 23 to prevent ink 11 from diffusing from the region, designated 27, where the nozzle of the unit cell 1 will be formed, through the substrate portion 21 to the region containing the wiring 25, and corroding the CMOS circuitry disposed in the region designated 22.
The first stage after the completion of the CMOS fabrication process consists of etching a portion of the passivation layer 24 to form the passivation recesses 29.
If, instead, the hole 32 were to be etched all the way to the interconnect layers 23, then to avoid the hole 32 being etched so as to destroy the transistors in the region 22, the hole 32 would have to be etched a greater distance away from that region so as to leave a suitable margin (indicated by the arrow 34) for etching inaccuracies. But the etching of the hole 31 from the top of the substrate portion 21, and the resultant shortened depth of the hole 32, means that a lesser margin 34 need be left, and that a substantially higher packing density of nozzles can thus be achieved.
The generation of a bubble sufficient for the ejection of the desired droplet will require less energy, thereby improving efficiency.
Then, the sacrificial resist of each of the resist layers 35, 39, 42 and 48, is removed using oxygen plasma, to form the structure shown in
While the above production process is used to produce the embodiment of the printhead shown in
Bonded Heater Element
In other embodiments, the heater elements are bonded to the internal walls of the chamber. Bonding the heater to solid surfaces within the chamber allows the etching and deposition fabrication process to be simplified. However, heat conduction to the silicon substrate can reduce the efficiency of the nozzle so that it is no longer ‘self cooling’. Therefore, in embodiments where the heater is bonded to solid surfaces within the chamber, it is necessary to take steps to thermally isolate the heater from the substrate.
One way of improving the thermal isolation between the heater and the substrate is to find a material with better thermal barrier properties than silicon dioxide, which is the traditionally used thermal barrier layer, described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,513,298. The Applicant has shown that the relevant parameter to consider when selecting the barrier layer, is the thermal product; (ρCk)1/2. The energy lost into a solid underlayer in contact with the heater is proportional to the thermal product of the underlayer, a relationship which may be derived by considering the length scale for thermal diffusion and the thermal energy absorbed over that length scale. Given that proportionality, it can be seen that a thermal barrier layer with reduced density and thermal conductivity will absorb less energy from the heater. This aspect of the invention focuses on the use of materials with reduced density and thermal conductivity as thermal barrier layers inserted underneath the heater layer, replacing the traditional silicon dioxide layer. In particular, this aspect of the invention focuses on the use of low-k dielectrics as thermal barriers
Low-k dielectrics have recently been used as the inter-metal dielectric of copper damascene integrated circuit technology. When used as an inter-metal dielectric, the reduced density and in some cases porosity of the low-k dielectrics help reduce the dielectric constant of the inter-metal dielectric, the capacitance between metal lines and the RC delay of the integrated circuit. In the copper damascene application, an undesirable consequence of the reduced dielectric density is poor thermal conductivity, which limits heat flow from the chip. In the thermal barrier application, low thermal conductivity is ideal, as it limits the energy absorbed from the heater.
Two examples of low-k dielectrics suitable for application as thermal barriers are Applied Material's Black Diamond™ and Novellus' Coral™, both of which are CVD deposited SiOCH films. These films have lower density than SiO2 (˜1340 kgm−3 vs ˜2200 kgm−3) and lower thermal conductivity (˜0.4 Wm−1K−1 vs ˜1.46 Wm−1K−1). The thermal products for these materials are thus around 600 Jm−2K−1 s−1/2, compared to
1495 Jm−2K−1 S−1/2 for SiO2 i.e. a 60% reduction in thermal product. To calculate the benefit that may be derived by replacing SiO2 underlayers with these materials, models using equation 3 in the Detailed Description can be used to show that ˜35% of the energy required to nucleate a bubble is lost by thermal diffusion into the underlayer when SiO2 underlayers are used. The benefit of the replacement is therefore 60% of 35% i.e. a 21% reduction in nucleation energy.
This benefit has been confirmed by the Applicant by comparing the energy required to nucleate a bubble on
The latter required 20% less energy for the onset of bubble nucleation, as determined by viewing the bubble formation stroboscopically in an open pool boiling configuration, using water as a test fluid. The open pool boiling was run for over 1 billion actuations, without any shift in nucleation energy or degradation of the bubble, indicating the underlayer is thermally stable up to the superheat limit of the water i.e. ˜300° C. Indeed, such layers can be thermally stable up to 550° C., as described in work related to the use of these films as Cu diffusion barriers (see “Physical and Barrier Properties of Amorphous Silicon-Oxycarbide Deposited by PECVD from Octamethylcycltetrasiloxane”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 151 (2004) by Chiu-Chih Chiang et. al.).
Further reduction in thermal conductivity, thermal product and the energy required to nucleate a bubble may be provided by introducing porosity into the dielectric, as has been done by Trikon Technologies, Inc. with their ORION™ 2.2 porous SiOCH film, which has a density of ˜1040 kgm−3 and thermal conductivity of ˜0.16 μm−1K−1 (see IST 2000 30043, “Final report on thermal modeling”, from the IST project “Ultra Low K Dielectrics For Damascene Copper Interconnect Schemes”). With a thermal product of ˜334 Jm−2K−1 S−112, this material would absorb 78% less energy than a SiO2 underlayer, resulting in a 78*35%=27% reduction in the energy required to nucleate a bubble. It is possible however that the introduction of porosity may compromise the moisture resistance of the material, which would compromise the thermal properties, since water has a thermal product of 1579 Jm−2K−1 s−1/2, close to that of SiO2. A moisture barrier could be introduced between the heater and the thermal barrier, but the heat absorption in this layer would likely degrade overall efficiency: in the preferred embodiment the thermal barrier is directly in contact with the underside of the heater. If it is not in direct contact, the thermal barrier layer is preferably no more than 1 μm away from the heater layer, as it will have little effect otherwise (the length scale for heat diffusion in the ˜1 μs time scale of the heating pulse in e.g. SiO2 is ˜1 μm).
An alternative for further lowering thermal conductivity without using porosity is to use the spin-on dielectrics, such as Dow Corning's SiLK™, which has a thermal conductivity of 0.18 Wm−1K−1. The spin-on films can also be made porous, but as with the CVD films, that may compromise moisture resistance. SiLK has thermal stability up to 450° C. One point of concern regarding the spin-on dielectrics is that they generally have large coefficients of thermal expansion (CTEs). Indeed, it seems that reducing k generally increases the CTE. This is implied in “A Study of Current Multilevel Interconnect Technologies for 90 nm Nodes and Beyond”, by Takayuki Ohba, Fujitsu magazine, Volume 38-1, paper 3. SiLK, for example, has a CTE of ˜70 ppm·K−1. This is likely to be much larger than the CTE of the overlying heater material, so large stresses and delamination are likely to result from heating to the ˜300° C. superheat limit of water based ink. SiOCH films, on the other hand, have a reasonably low CTE of ˜10 ppm·K−1, which in the Applicant's devices, matches the CTE of the TiAlN heater material: no delamination of the heater was observed in the Applicant's open pool testing after 1 billion bubble nucleations. Since the heater materials used in the inkjet application are likely to have CTEs around ˜10 ppm·K−1, the CVD deposited films are preferred over the spin-on films.
One final point of interest relating to this application relates to the lateral definition of the thermal barrier. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,902 the thermal barrier layer is modified after deposition so that a region of low thermal diffusivity exists immediately underneath the heater, while further out a region of high thermal diffusivity exists. The arrangement is designed to resolve two conflicting requirements:
Such an arrangement is unnecessary in the Applicant's nozzles, which are designed to be self cooling, in the sense that the only heat removal required by the chip is the heat removed by ejected droplets. Formally, ‘self cooled’ or ‘self cooling’ nozzles can be defined to be nozzles in which the energy required to eject a drop of the ejectable liquid is less than the maximum amount of thermal energy that can be removed by the drop, being the energy required to heat a volume of the ejectable fluid equivalent to the drop volume from the temperature at which the fluid enters the printhead to the heterogeneous boiling point of the ejectable fluid. In this case, the steady state temperature of the printhead chip will be less than the heterogenous boiling point of the ejectable fluid, regardless of nozzle density, firing rates or the presence or otherwise of a conductive heatsink. If a nozzle is self cooling, the heat is removed from the front face of the printhead via the ejected droplets, and does not need to be transported to the rear face of the chip. Thus the thermal barrier layer does not need to be patterned to confine it to the region underneath the heaters. This simplifies the processing of the device. In fact, a CVD SiOCH may simply be inserted between the CMOS top layer passivation and the heater layer. This is now discussed below with reference to
Referring firstly to
Control of Ink Drop Ejection
Referring once again to
In operation, ink 11 passes through the ink inlet passage 9 (see
The various possible structures for the heater 14, some of which are shown in
Modern drive electronic components tend to require lower drive voltages than earlier versions, with lower resistances of drive transistors in their “on” state. Thus, in such drive transistors, for a given transistor area, there is a tendency to higher current capability and lower voltage tolerance in each process generation.
It will be noted that the heater 14 shown in
In
Assuming that the energy applied to the ink by the upper element 10.1 is X, it will be appreciated that the energy applied by the lower element 10.2 is about 2X, and the energy applied by the two elements together is about 3X. Of course, the energy applied when neither element is operational, is zero. Thus, in effect, two bits of information can be printed with the one nozzle 3.
As the above factors of energy output may not be achieved exactly in practice, some “fine tuning” of the exact sizing of the elements 10.1 and 10.2, or of the drive voltages that are applied to them, may be required.
It will also be noted that the upper element 10.1 is rotated through 180° about a vertical axis relative to the lower element 10.2. This is so that their electrodes 15 are not coincident, allowing independent connection to separate drive circuits.
Discussed below, under appropriate headings, are specific features and advantages of embodiments of the invention. The features are described individually to provide a comprehensive understanding of each aspect of the invention.
Efficiency of the Printhead
The printhead of the present invention has a design that configures the nozzle structure for enhanced efficiency: less than 200 nanojoules (nJ) is required to heat the element sufficiently to form a bubble 12 in the ink 11, so as to eject a drop 16 of ink through a nozzle 3. In some of the Applicant's nozzle designs, the energy required to form a bubble in the ink is less than 80 nJ. By comparison, prior art devices generally require over 5 microjoules to heat the element 10 sufficiently to generate a vapor bubble 12 to eject an ink drop 16. Thus, the energy requirements of the present invention are an order of magnitude lower than that of known thermal ink jet systems. This lower energy consumption provides lower operating costs, smaller power supplies, and so on, but also dramatically simplifies printhead cooling, allows higher densities of nozzles 3, and permits printing at higher resolutions.
These advantages of the present invention are especially significant in ‘self cooling’ printheads where the individual ejected ink drops 16, themselves, constitute the major cooling mechanism of the printhead, as described further below.
Self-Cooling of the Printhead
Referring again to
As the ink drop 16 ejected and the amount of ink 11 drawn into the printhead to replace the ejected drop are constituted by the same type of liquid, and will essentially be of the same mass, it is convenient to express the net movement of energy as, on the one hand, the energy added by the heating of the element 10, and on the other hand, the net removal of heat energy that results from ejecting the ink drop 16 and the intake of the replacement quantity of ink 11. Assuming that the replacement quantity of ink 11 is at ambient temperature, the change in energy due to net movement of the ejected and replacement quantities of ink can conveniently be expressed as the heat that would be required to raise the temperature of the ejected drop 16, if it were at ambient temperature, to the actual temperature of the drop as it is ejected.
It will be appreciated that a determination of whether the above criteria are met depends on what constitutes the ambient temperature. In the present case, the temperature that is taken to be the ambient temperature is the temperature at which ink 11 enters the printhead from the ink storage reservoir (not shown) which is connected, in fluid flow communication, to the inlet passages 9 of the printhead. Typically the ambient temperature will be the room ambient temperature, which is usually roughly 20° C. (Celsius).
However, the ambient temperature may be less, if for example, the room temperature is lower, or if the ink 11 entering the printhead is refrigerated.
In one preferred embodiment, the printhead is designed to achieve complete self-cooling (i.e. where the outgoing heat energy due to the net effect of the ejected and replacement quantities of ink 11 is equal to the heat energy added by the heater element 10).
By way of example, assume that the ink 11 is the bubble forming liquid and is water based, thus having a boiling point of approximately 100° C. If the ambient temperature is 40° C., then there is a maximum of 60° C. from the ambient temperature to the ink boiling temperature: that is the maximum temperature rise that the printhead could undergo. To ensure self cooling in this case, the energy required to produce each drop 16 must be less than the maximum amount of energy that can be taken away. The maximum amount of energy that can be taken away is
Eremoved=ρCVΔT (equation 1),
where ρ=1000 kg·m−3 is the density of water, C=4190 J·kg−1·C−1 is the specific heat of water, V is the drop volume and ΔT=60° C. Assume, by way of example, that a 1.2 pl drop is ejected. In this case Eremoved=302 nJ. In this example, if it took more than 302 nJ to eject each drop, the temperature of a dense array of nozzles would rise with each pulse to the point where the ink inside the nozzles 11 would boil continuously. If, however, it took less than 302 nJ to produce each drop, then regardless of other cooling mechanisms, the steady state ink temperature would settle below the boiling point, at a maximum temperature given by
Tsteady state=Tambient+Eejection/ρCV (equation 2)
It is desirable to avoid having ink temperatures within the printhead (other than at time of ink drop 16 ejection) which are very close to the boiling point of the ink 11. Temperatures close to boiling result in elevated evaporation rates, causing the ink in the nozzles 11 to rapidly increase in viscosity and clog the nozzles. Furthermore, ink temperatures above 60° C. can cause dissolved air in water based inks to come out of solution (known as ‘outgassing’), forming air bubbles that can block the ink channels, preventing refill of the nozzle chamber 7. Accordingly, a preferred embodiment of the invention is configured such that complete self-cooling, as described above, can be achieved so that the ink 11 (bubble forming liquid) in a particular nozzle chamber 7 has a steady state temperature substantially below the ink boiling point when the heating element 10 is not active. In the case of water based inks, the steady state temperature is ideally less than 60° C., to avoid outgassing of dissolved air.
The main advantage of self cooling is that it allows for a high nozzle density and for a high speed of printhead operation without requiring elaborate cooling methods for preventing undesired boiling in nozzles 3 adjacent to nozzles from which ink drops 16 are being ejected. This can allow as much as a hundred-fold increase in nozzle packing density than would be the case if such a feature, and the temperature criteria mentioned, were not present. Furthermore, if the steady state ink temperature predicted by equation 2 is significantly below boiling (˜60° C. for water based inks), the firing frequency of the nozzles will not limited by thermal constraints. The maximum firing rate and the resulting print speed will instead limited by the refill time of the ink chambers.
Note that thermal conduction out of the printhead integrated circuit (see item 81 in
Areal Density of Nozzles
This feature of the invention relates to the density, by area, of the nozzles 3 on the printhead. With reference to
In one preferred embodiment, the areal density exceeds 20,000 nozzles/cm2 of surface area 50, while in another preferred embodiment, the areal density exceeds 40,000 nozzles/cm2. In some of the Applicant's designs, the areal density is 48 828 nozzles/cm2.
When referring to the areal density, each nozzle 3 is taken to include the drive-circuitry corresponding to the nozzle, which consists, typically, of a drive transistor, a shift register, an enable gate and clock regeneration circuitry (this circuitry not being specifically identified).
With reference to
The main advantage of a high areal density is low manufacturing cost, as the devices are batch fabricated on silicon wafers of a particular size.
The more nozzles 3 that can be accommodated in a square cm of substrate, the more nozzles can be fabricated in a single batch, which typically consists of one wafer. The cost of manufacturing a CMOS plus MEMS wafer of the type used in the printhead of the present invention is, to some extent, independent of the nature of patterns that are formed on it. Therefore if the patterns are relatively small, a relatively large number of nozzles 3 can be included. This allows more nozzles 3 and more printheads to be manufactured for the same cost than in cases where the nozzles had a lower areal density. The cost is directly proportional to the area taken by the nozzles 3.
Drop Size
Equation 2 (Tsteady state=Tambient+Eejection/ρCV) shows that both the drop volume and ejection energy strongly impact the steady state temperature of the ink in a self-cooling printhead. Doubling the drop size, for example, doubles the amount of heat the drop can take away, but doubling the drop size will generally required more energy, so the steady state ink temperature will not necessarily be lower.
In the present invention, the print head resolution is 1600 dpi and the preferred drop size is between 1 pl and 2 pl. Drops that are 1 pl will produce 1600 dpi images on a page without any white space visible between dots if the drop placement accuracy is very good. Drops that are 2 μl will produce 1600 dpi dots that overlap significantly, loosening the requirement for accuracy and drop trajectory stability (commonly termed “directionality”).
Equation 2 can be used to determine the relationship between ΔT=Tsteady state−Tambient and the energy required to eject drops between 1 pl and 2 pl. For 1 pl drops of water based ink, a 300 nJ ejection energy results in a 71° C. rise from the ambient temperature. For 1.2 pl drops, 300 nJ results in a 60° C. rise and for 2 pl drops, 300 nJ results in a 36° C. rise. Assuming the worst case ambient temperature is 40° C., the steady state ink temperature with 300 nJ, 2 pl drop ejection will be 76° C. The ink will be above the boiling point with 300 nJ, 1 pl drop ejection and the ink will be at the boiling point with 300 nJ, 1.2 pl drop ejection. Given the constraints on drop size and ink temperature, for the present invention 300 nJ is chosen as the upper limit of ejection energy for a viable self-cooling design.
Features of Low Energy Ejection
The embodiments shown achieve self cooling with nozzle designs that eject with much less energy than the prior art. This led to the development of a range of mechanisms and techniques for reducing ejection energy. These are best understood by considering the energy required for bubble formation and each source of energy loss associated with driving the heater. An approximate expression for the energy required for bubble formation is:
E≈ΔT*A*[ρhChth+ρcCctc+{(ρuCutu)1/2+(ρiCiti)1/2}τ1/2]+FL+SL (equation 3),
where ΔT is the temperature increase from ambient to the film boiling point (˜309° C. for water based inks), A is the planar surface area of the heater, ρ is density, C is specific heat, t is thickness, k is thermal conductivity, τ is the time taken for the bubble to nucleate and the subscripts h, c, u and i refer to heater, coating, underlayer and ink respectively. The coating is any passivating or protective coating placed between the heater material and the ink, assumed for the sake of simplicity in equation 3 to be a single homogenous layer. The underlayer is the material in thermal contact with the heater, on the opposite side of the heater to the side which forms the bubble that causes ejection. This definition leaves open the possibility of heaters attached to the chamber sidewall or roof and the possibility of a heater suspended at each end which is fully immersed in ink. In the case of a suspended heater the underlayer is ink and its properties are identical to the ink properties. FL is the loss in the driving CMOS FET and SL is loss in non-nucleating resistances in series with the heater. Some second order terms associated with heat leakage from the edge of the heater have been neglected in equation 3.
According to equation 3, there are many practical possibilities for minimizing the energy required for bubble formation:
8. minimize FET loss FL
9 minimize series loss SL
Each of these options is discussed in detail below.
Reduced Heater Area
The heater area A plays a large role in equation 3. Two terms scale directly with area: the energy required to heat the heater to the film boiling point ΔTAρhChth and the energy required to heat the coating to the film boiling point ΔTAρcCctc. The energy lost by diffusion into the underlayer ΔTA(ρuCuku)1/2τ1/2 and the energy lost by diffusion into the ink ΔTA(τiCiki)1/2τ1/2 are even more strongly dependent on area, since τ depends on A: smaller area implies a smaller volume being heated and smaller volumes will reach the film boiling point more quickly with a given power input. Overall, since the FL and SL terms in equation 3 can largely be eliminated by design, heater area has a strong influence on the energy required to eject and the steady state fluid temperature. Typically, halving the heater area (keeping the heater resistance constant) will reduce the energy required to nucleate the bubble by ˜60%.
The heater areas of printers currently on the market are around 400 μm2. These heaters are covered with ˜1 μm of protective coatings. If the protective coatings on prior art heaters could be removed to eliminate the energy wasted in heating them, it would be possible to create self cooling inkjets with heater areas as large as 400 μm2, but the drop volume would need to be at least 5 μl to take the required amount of heat away. It is generally understood by people experienced in the art that drop volumes smaller than 5 μl are desirable, to:
Drop sizes of 1-2 pl are preferable, as they allow ˜1600 dpi printing. The Applicant has fabricated nozzles that eject ˜1.2 pl water based ink drops with ˜200 nJ ejection energy using ˜150 μm2 heaters. The corresponding temperature rise of the chip with an arbitrary number of nozzles is predicted to be 40° C., since a 1.2 pl water based ink drop 40° C. above ambient can take away 200 nJ of heat. In reality, the rise in chip temperature from the ambient will be somewhat less than this, as heat conduction out of the back of the chip is not taken into account in this calculation. In any case, these nozzles meet the definition of self cooling, as they require no cooling mechanisms other than heat removal by the droplets to keep the ink below its boiling point in the expected range of ambient temperatures. If the ambient is 20° C., the steady state chip and ink temperature will be less than 60° C., no matter how densely the nozzles are packed or how quickly they are fired. 60° C. is a good upper temperature limit to aim for, since ink can quickly dehydrate and clog the nozzles or outgas air bubbles above that temperature. Therefore, when the heater area is less than 150 μm2, the steady state ink temperature can be <60° C. when ejecting 1.2 pl drops with 20° C. ambient. Likewise, if the heater area is less than 225 μm2, the steady state ink temperature can be <80° C. when ejecting 1.2 pl drops without any conductive cooling.
The limit to which the heater area can be reduced is determined by the evaporation of volatile ink components from the ink meniscus in the nozzle. In the case of a water based ink, evaporation of water from the ink will decrease the concentration of water in the region between the heater and the nozzle, increasing the concentration of other ink components such as the humectant glycerol. This increases the viscosity of the ink and also reduces the amount of vapour generated, so as the evaporation proceeds:
When eventually the water concentration between the heater and the nozzle drops below a certain level, the impulse of the bubble explosion will be insufficient to eject the ink. To ensure continuous firing of the nozzles, the interval between successive firings must be less than the time taken for the water concentration to drop below this critical level, after which the nozzle is effectively clogged.
This time period is influenced by many factors, including ambient humidity, the ink composition, the heater-nozzle separation and the heater area. The heater area is tied into this phenomenon through the ink viscosity. Smaller heaters have a smaller bubble, are less able to force viscous fluid out the nozzle and consequently have a lower viscosity limit for ejection. They are thus more susceptible to evaporation. Heaters that are too small will have clogging times that are impractically short, requiring that nozzles be fired at a rate that would adversely affect print quality. One would expect the 150 μm2 heater of the present invention to have a significantly shorter clogging time than printers currently on the market, which have heater areas around 400 μm2. In the present invention, however, there is the option of suspending the heater so that it is fully immersed in the fluid, with both the top side and underside contributing to bubble formation. In that case the effective surface area is 300 μm2, only a 25% reduction from printers currently on the market.
Thin or Non-Existent Protective Coatings
To protect against the effects of oxidation, corrosion and cavitation on the heater material, inkjet manufacturers use protective layers, typically made from Si3N4, SiC and Ta. These layers are thick in comparison to the heater. U.S. Pat. No. 6,786,575, to Anderson et al (assigned to Lexmark), is an example of this structure. The heater is ˜0.1 μm thick while the total thickness of the protective layers is at least 0.7 μm. With reference to equation 3, this means there will be a ΔTAρcCctc term that is ˜7 times larger than the ΔTAρhChth term. Removing the protective layers eliminates the ΔTAρcCctc term. Removing the protective layers also significantly reduces the diffusive loss terms ΔTA(ρuCuku)1/2τ1/2 and ΔTA(ρiCiki)1/2τ1/2, since a smaller volume is being heated and smaller volumes will reach the film boiling point more quickly with a given power input. Models based on equation 3 show that removing the 0.7 μm thick protective coatings can reduce the energy required to eject by as much as a factor of 6. Thus in the preferred embodiment, there are no protective coatings deposited onto the heater material. Removing or greatly thinning the protective coatings (while maintaining a practical heater longevity) is possible, provided:
With respect to the option of thinning the coating rather than removing it entirely, models based on equation 3 show that ˜0.7 nm is the thickness limit for self cooling operation with water based inks, assuming 20° C. ambient and 1.2 pl drops: even with a relatively small 120 μm2 heater the ink will be close to boiling using this thickness (neglecting the conductive heat sinking mechanism, on the assumption it will be inadequate for high density nozzle packing and high firing frequencies). In preferred embodiments, the total thickness of protective coating layers is less than 0.1 μm and the heater can be pulsed more than 1 billion times (i.e. eject more than 1 billion drops) before the heater burns out. Assuming the ambient temperature is 20° C., heater area is 120 μm2 and the droplet size is 1.2 pl, the steady state ink temperature will be below 60° C. thus avoiding problems discussed above in relation to heater area.
Reduced Heater Thickness
Since the ΔTAρcCctc term associated with heating the protective layers is generally much larger than the ΔTAρhChth term associated with heating the heater, reducing the heater thickness th will be of little benefit unless the coating is eliminated or made thin compared to the heater. Presuming that has been done, reducing th will further reduce the volume to be heated, thereby reducing not only the ΔTAρhChth term, but also the diffusive terms, as nucleation will occur more quickly. Models based on equation 3 show that a 0.1 μm thick uncoated heater will typically require less than half of the energy required by a 0.5 μm thick heater. However, attempting to reduce thickness below 0.1 μm is likely to cause problems with deposition thickness control and possibly electromigration. To avoid the risk of electromigration failure with such thin heaters, the heater resistivity needs to be at least 2 μOhm·m, to ensure the current density is not too high (<1 MA·cm−2).
Minimizing ρhCh and ρcCc
The densities and specific heats of the heater and protective coating materials are generally of secondary concern to an inkjet designer, since properties such as resistivity, oxidation resistance, corrosion resistance and cavitation resistance are of greater importance. However, if these considerations are put to one side, materials with a lower density-specific heat product are desirable. Reducing ρhCh and ρcCc and in equation 3 has the same effect as reducing th and tc.
Generally the ρC product does not vary by more than a factor of 2 in the class of materials available to the inkjet designer: considering the case of an uncoated heater, models based on equation 3 indicate the heater material selection will therefore affect the energy required to eject by at most 30%.
Minimizing Nucleation Time (Minimizing Diffusive Loss)
It is important to minimize τ, as it governs the diffusive loss into the ink and underlayer. The first step in minimizing τ is to reduce the volume to be heated, which is done by minimizing A, th, tc and in the case of a heater bonded to a solid underlayer, (ρuCuku)1/2. Minimizing τ then becomes a matter of selecting the right heater resistance and drive voltage, to set the heater power. Lower resistance or higher voltage will increase the power, causing a reduction in nucleation time τ. Lower resistance can be provided by either lowering the heater resistivity or making the heater wider (and shorter to avoid affecting A). Lowering the resistance is not the preferred option however, as elevating the current could cause problems with electromigration, increased FET loss FL and increased series loss SL. Higher voltage, on the other hand, could cause problems with electrolytic destruction of the heater or ink components, so a compromise is appropriate: in the preferred embodiment, FET drive voltages between 5V and 12V are considered optimum. Typical numbers derived from equation 3 for an uncoated 0.3 μm thick 120 μm2 heater are: 175 nJ required to eject with a 5V, 1.5 μs pulse, or 110 nJ with a 7V, 0.5 μs pulse i.e. a 37% reduction in ejection energy obtained by simply changing the drive voltage. Thus, in one preferred embodiment, the voltage and resistance should be chosen to make τ<1.5 μs. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the voltage and resistance should be chosen to make τ<1 μs.
It should be noted that without a shunt layer, some heater shapes will have more extraneous series resistance than others. The Omega shape, for example, has two arms which attach the heater loop to the contacts. If those arms are wider in the attachment section than the loop section, the arms will not contribute to the bubble formation, but they will contribute to the extraneous series resistance. This explains why the extraneous series resistance of these devices with an Omega shaped heater is higher than the parallel bar designs discussed in the reduced heater area section: the parallel bars run straight between the two contacts without resistive attachment sections. Without a shunt layer, heater shapes without resistive attachment sections are preferable.
Side Effects of Reduced Nucleation Time
It should be noted that the heat that diffuses into the ink and the underlayer prior to nucleation has an effect on the volume of fluid that vaporizes once nucleation has occurred and consequently the impulse of the vapor explosion (impulse=force integrated over time). Tests have shown that nozzles run with shorter, higher voltage heater pulses have shorter ink clogging times (discussed above in relation to Reduced Heater Area). This is explained by the reduced impulse of the vapor explosion, which is less able to push ink made viscous by evaporation through the nozzle.
The Applicant has additionally noted that shorter, higher voltage heater pulses reduce the extent of “microflooding”. Microflooding is a phenomenon whereby the stalk dragged behind the ejecting droplet attaches itself to one side of the nozzle and drags across the surface of the nozzle plate 2. When droplet break-off occurs part of the stalk remains attached to the nozzle plate, depositing liquid onto the nozzle plate. Liquid pooling asymmetrically on one side of the nozzle can cause printing problems, because the stalks of subsequent droplets can attach themselves to the pooled liquid, causing misdirection of those droplets. The attachment of droplet stalks to liquid already on the nozzle plate encourages further accumulation of liquid, so the phenomenon of microflooding and misdirection is self-perpetuating, depending on a balance of firing rate, evaporation rate and the rate at which fluid is re-imbibed back into the nozzles. The traditional method by which the droplet stalks are discouraged from attaching themselves to the nozzle plate involves reducing the surface energy of the nozzle plate with an appropriate surface treatment or coating. This also encourages re-imbibing of fluid on the nozzle plate. However, the Applicant has found that microflooding can be dramatically reduced without surface treatment by reducing the time taken to nucleate below High magnification stroboscopic imaging indicates this is most likely due to the effect of reduced bubble impulse, which reduces the length of the droplet stalk and the likelihood of the stalk attaching itself to one side of the nozzle.
Minimizing (ρiCiki)1/2
Aside from minimizing τ, not much can be done about reducing heat lost into the ink prior to the onset of film boiling, since the so-called thermal product (ρiCiki)1/2 is a material property intrinsic to the ink base, be it water or alcohol. For example, ethanol has a much lower thermal product than water (570 Jm−2K−1 s−1/2 versus 1586 Jm−2K−l s−1/2). While this would greatly reduce heat lost into the ink, the inkjet designer does not generally have the freedom to change ink base, since the ink base strongly affects the interaction of the ink with the print medium. In addition, ethanol and other similar solvents are less suitable to self-cooling printheads: despite having reduced ejection energies, the lower densities and specific heats mean less heat is able to be taken away in the droplets, and the reduced boiling points mean there is less margin for operating without boiling the ink continuously.
Improved Thermal Minimizing (ρuCuku)1/2
Generally the inkjet designer has considerable freedom to tailor the thermal properties of the underlayer, by selecting a material with a low thermal product (ρuCuku)1/2. Low thermal conductivity k is a good initial screening criterion for material selection, since k can vary up to 2 orders of magnitude in the class of available materials, while the product ρC varies less than 1 order of magnitude. In determining whether a particular material is suitable, it is instructive to compare the thermal products of H2O (TP=1579 Jm−2K−1 s−1/2) and
SiO2 (TP=1495 Jm−2K−1 s−1/2). Since the thermal products of the two materials are very close, it is possible to conclude:
Thus there are at least 2 configurations in which the heat loss into the underlayer is no worse than the heat loss into the ink (underlayer=SiO2 and underlayer=ink). To improve on this situation: underlayers should be selected on the basis that the thermal product of the underlayer is less than or equal to the thermal product of the ink.
Other candidates for underlayers with lower thermal products than water or SiO2 come from the new class of low-k dielectrics, such as Applied Material's Black Diamond™ and Novellus' Coral™, both of which are CVD deposited SiOC films, used in copper damascene processing. These films have lower density than SiO2 (˜1340 kgm−3 vs ˜2200 kgm−3) and lower thermal conductivity (−0.4 μm−1K−1 vs ˜1.46 Wm−1K−1). Consequently, their thermal product is around 600 Jm−2K−1 S−1/2 i.e. a 60% reduction in thermal product compared to SiO2. To calculate the benefit that may be derived by replacing SiO2 underlayers with these materials, models using equation 3 can be used to show that ˜35% of the energy required for ejection is lost by diffusion into the underlayer when SiO2 underlayers are used. The benefit of the replacement is therefore 60% of 35% i.e. a 21% reduction in energy of ejection. Thus in another preferred embodiment, the underlayer is made from carbon doped silicon oxide (SiOC) or hydrogenated carbon doped silicon oxide (SiOCH). In a further preferred embodiment, the silica's thermal product is reduced by introducing porosity to reduce the density and thermal conductivity.
Minimizing FET Loss
The resistance of the FET depends on:
The area of the FET is determined by the packing density of the nozzles and the size of each nozzle's unit cell: increasing the packing density will reduce the FET size and increase the FET resistance. N-channel FETs have lower resistance than P-channel FETs because their carrier mobility is higher. However a PFET may be preferable as it is able to pull one side of the heater up to the rail voltage. NFETs cannot do this easily: they are typically used to pull one side of the heater down to ground, implying the heater is normally held high. Holding the heater at a positive DC bias may subject the heater to electrochemical attack.
As a rule of thumb, the heater resistance should be at least 4 times higher than the FET on resistance, so that by the voltage divider equation, no more than 20% of the circuit power is dissipated in the FET. The heater resistance should not be too high though, as this reduces the power delivered to the heater, increases the nucleation time and increases the amount of heat lost by diffusion into the ink and underlayer prior to nucleation. The ideal heater resistance depends on the CMOS process chosen, and the type of FET (N or P). SPICE models of the FET can be used in conjunction with equation 3 to determine the heater resistance which minimizes FET loss without compromising diffusive loss. Typical resistance ranges for an uncoated 120 μm2 heater are 50-200 Ohms for a 5V process and 300-800 Ohms for a 12V process. Designers with the freedom to choose should target the upper end of these ranges, to minimize device current: high currents can cause problems in the circuit external to the heater, including electromigration, series loss, power supply droop and ground bounce. Preferably, the higher resistances would be obtained with higher heater resistivity rather than modifications of the heater geometry, since higher resistivity will reduce the heater current density, reducing the likelihood of heater electromigration failure. The resistivity range suited to a 5V process is ˜2.5 μOhm·m to ˜12 μOhm·m. The resistivity range suited to a 12V process is ˜8 μOhm·m to ˜100 μOhm·m.
Thus in the preferred embodiment, the heater resistance is between 50 Ohms and 800 Ohms, while the heater resistivity is between 8 μOhm·m and 100 μOhm·m.
Minimizing Series Resistance Loss (SL)
Referring back to
Minimizing contact resistance involves rigid standards of cleanliness and careful preparation of the metal surface onto which the heater electrodes 15 will be deposited. Consideration must be given to the possibility of insulating layers forming at the contact interface as a result of the formation of undesirable phases or species: in some cases a thin barrier layer may be inserted between the CMOS metal and the heater electrode 15 to avoid undesirable reactions.
The resistance of the sections connecting the electrode to the heater can be minimized by
In the preferred embodiment, the series resistance contribution from the contacts and non-nucleating sections of the heater layer is less than 10 Ohms
Bubble Formation on Opposite Sides of Heater Element
Referring to
In a configuration such as that of
Of course where the heater element 10 is in the form of a suspended beam as described above in relation to
The advantage of the bubble 12 forming on both sides is the higher efficiency that is achievable. This is due to a reduction in heat that is wasted in heating solid materials in the vicinity of the heater element 10, which do not contribute to formation of a bubble 12. This is illustrated in
Other Aspects of Self Cooling Design and Bubble Formation
Although equation 3 is very useful, it does not embody all the requirements of a self cooling nozzle design, as it only describes the energy required to form a bubble: it does not predict the force of the bubble, the likelihood of ejection or the impact of removing the protective overcoats on heater lifetime.
As discussed in relation to equation 3, a key step in lowering the energy required to form a bubble is the reduction of heater area. This has an undesirable side effect of reducing the force of the bubble explosion. To compensate for the reduced force, the designer must:
Furthermore, with the oxidation prevention coatings removed, the designer must replace the conventional heater material with one less susceptible to oxidation. With the tantalum cavitation protection coating removed, the designer must find an alternate means of preventing cavitation damage.
These additional requirements are discussed below.
Heater-Nozzle Separation
The ink chamber volumes of ink jet printers currently on the market are typically greater than 10 pl. The heaters are around 400 μm2 and are placed at the bottom of the ink chamber, about 12 nm below the nozzle. In the present invention, 1-2 pl is chosen as preferred drop size to facilitate 1600 dpi resolution and 150 μm2 is chosen as the preferred heater area to facilitate self cooling operation with that drop size.
The reduction in the heater area of the present invention reduces the bubble impulse (pressure integrated over area and time), so the likelihood of ejecting a particular ejectable liquid is reduced. It is possible to mitigate this effect by reducing the forces acting against the drop ejection, so that ejection with reduced bubble impulse remains possible.
The forces acting against drop ejection are associated with:
With a particular heater area and bubble impulse, the inertia of the ink will determine the acceleration of the body of liquid between the heater and the nozzle. The inertia depends on the liquid density and the volume of liquid between the heater and the nozzle. It is possible to reduce the ink inertia by reducing the volume of liquid between the heater and the nozzle i.e. by moving the heater closer to the nozzle. With reference to
In choosing to move the heater closer to the nozzle, one must take into account nozzle clogging from increased ink viscosity because of water evaporation.
If the heater is moved closer to the ink-air interface, the concentration of the volatile ink component (typically water) at the level of the heater will decrease (a diffusion gradient of the volatile component results from the loss of that component by evaporation at the ink-air interface). This decreases the volume of vapour generated and the impulse of the bubble and makes the clogging time shorter.
It should be noted that the heater to nozzle aperture separation, and therefore the inertia of the ink displaced are the important design considerations and not the chamber volume. In light of this, the heater need not be attached to the bottom of the ink chamber: it may also be suspended or attached to the roof of the chamber.
It is important to realize that in addition to inertia, successful ejection requires that the bubble impart sufficient momentum to overcome the other forces acting against ejection i.e. those associated with surface tension and viscosity.
Surface Tension and Viscosity
Surface tension decelerates the emerging liquid from the moment the meniscus in the nozzle begins to bulge to the moment of drop break-off. If the bubble impulse is sufficient to push the meniscus out far enough, a droplet will form, but this droplet will drag a stalk of liquid behind it that will attach the droplet to the liquid remaining in the ink chamber. The action of surface tension in the stalk acts like a stretching rubber band that decelerates the droplet, but if the drop momentum is high enough, the stalk will stretch to a sufficient length for drop break-off to occur (a necessary condition for successful ejection). The length to which the stalk must be stretched is largely governed by the critical wavelength of the Rayleigh-Taylor instability, which is a strongly increasing function of liquid viscosity. The stalks of higher viscosity liquids will stretch out further before break-off occurs, giving surface tension more time to decelerate the droplet. Thus drop break-off is harder to achieve with higher viscosity fluids: if the bubble impulse is too low or the viscosity is high enough, the drop will not break off; the stalk will instead pull the droplet back into the ink chamber.
Nozzle Plate Thicknesses
Viscosity plays an additional role in reducing the likelihood of drop break-off: viscous drag in the nozzle reduces the momentum of fluid flowing through the nozzle. The viscous drag increases as the nozzle length in the direction of fluid flow increases, so devices with thinner nozzle plates are more likely to eject if the bubble impulse is low. As addressed below in relation to the formation of the nozzle plate 2 by CVD, and with the advantages described in that regard, the nozzle plates in the present invention are thinner than in the prior art. More particularly, the nozzle plates 2 are less than 10 μm thick and typically about 2 μm thick.
The likelihood of ejection can be determined with a particular heater area, heater-nozzle separation, nozzle diameter and length, liquid viscosity and surface tension using finite-element solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations together with the volume-of-fluid (VOF) method to simulate the free surface motion. These computations can be used to examine the optimal actuator geometry for low energy ejection (<500 nJ) for a range of liquids of interest. In particular, the following limits have been determined for successful ejection:
The Applicant's devices satisfy these constraints, along with a number of others described in the above referenced co-pending applications. In doing so, the Applicant has successfully fabricated self-cooling devices, with drop sizes of 1 pl to 2 pl and ejection energies of ˜200 nJ for water based inks. In comparison, printheads on the market typically have heat-nozzle separations and nozzle lengths of 10 μm or more and typically have ejection energies of ˜4000 nJ.
It will be appreciated by those experienced in the art that any reduction in ejection energy is highly desirable for any thermal inkjet design, regardless of whether that reduction is sufficient to achieve self cooling. The energy of ejection will be significantly reduced by adopting the measures discussed above. This will lower the chip temperature and allow increases in nozzle density and firing rate, even if it is not to the degree permitted by self-cooling designs.
Chemical Vapour Deposited Nozzle Plate, and Thin Nozzle Plates
The nozzle ejection aperture 5 of each unit cell 1 extends through the nozzle plate 2, the nozzle plate thus constituting a structure which is formed by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). In various preferred embodiments, the CVD is of silicon nitride, silicon dioxide or silicon oxy-nitride.
The advantage of the nozzle plate 2 being formed by CVD is that it is formed in place without the requirement for assembling the nozzle plate to other components such as the walls 6 of the unit cell 1. This is an important advantage because the assembly of the nozzle plate 2 that would otherwise be required can be difficult to effect and can involve potentially complex issues. Such issues include the potential mismatch of thermal expansion between the nozzle plate 2 and the parts to which it would be assembled, the difficulty of successfully keeping components aligned to each other, keeping them planar, and so on, during the curing process of the adhesive which bonds the nozzle plate 2 to the other parts.
The issue of thermal expansion is a significant factor in the prior art, which limits the size of ink jets that can be manufactured. This is because the difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion between, for example, a nickel nozzle plate and a substrate to which the nozzle plate is connected, where this substrate is of silicon, is quite substantial. Consequently, over as small a distance as that occupied by, say, 1000 nozzles, the relative thermal expansion that occurs between the respective parts, in being heated from the ambient temperature to the curing temperature required for bonding the parts together, can cause a dimension mismatch of significantly greater than a whole nozzle length. This would be significantly detrimental for such devices.
Another problem addressed by the features of the invention presently under discussion, at least in embodiments thereof, is that, in prior art devices, nozzle plates that need to be assembled are generally laminated onto the remainder of the printhead under conditions of relatively high stress. This can result in breakages or undesirable deformations of the devices. The deposition of the nozzle plate layer 2 by CVD in the embodiments of the present invention avoids this.
A further advantage of the present features of the invention, at least in embodiments thereof, is their compatibility with existing semiconductor manufacturing processes. Depositing a nozzle plate 2 by CVD allows the nozzle plate to be included in the printhead at the scale of normal silicon wafer production, using processes normally used for semi-conductor manufacture.
Existing bubble jet systems experience pressure transients, during the bubble generation phase, of up to 100 atmospheres. If the nozzle plates 2 in such devices were applied by CVD, then to withstand such pressure transients, a substantial thickness of CVD nozzle plate would be required. As would be understood by those skilled in the art, such thicknesses of deposited nozzle plates would give rise to certain problems as discussed below.
For example, the thickness of nitride sufficient to withstand a 100 atmosphere pressure in the nozzle chamber 7 may be, say, 10 microns. With reference to
Another problem that would exist in the case of such a thick nozzle plate 2, relates to the actual etching process. This is assuming that the nozzle 3 is etched, as shown, perpendicular to the wafer 8 of the substrate portion, for example using standard plasma etching. This would typically require more than 10 microns of resist 69 to be applied. The level of resolution required to expose that thickness of resist 69 becomes difficult to achieve, as the focal depth of the stepper that is used to expose the resist is relatively small. Although it would be possible to expose this relevant depth of resist 69 using x-rays, this would be a relatively costly process.
A further problem that would exist with such a thick nozzle plate 2 in a case where a 10 micron thick layer of nitride were CVD deposited on a silicon substrate wafer, is that, because of the difference in thermal expansion between the CVD layer and the substrate, as well as the inherent stress of within thick deposited layer, the wafer could be caused to bow to such a degree that further steps in the lithographic process would become impractical. Thus, a 10 micron thick nozzle plate 2 is possible but (unlike in the present invention), disadvantageous.
With reference to
Furthermore, the etch time, and the resist thickness required to etch nozzles 3 in such a nozzle plate 2, and the stress on the substrate wafer 8, will not be excessive.
Embodiments of the present invention are able to use a relatively thin nozzle plate 2 because the forces exerted on it are smaller, due to a reduction in heater surface area and input pulse length: both of these factors will as previously mentioned influence the amount of ejectable fluid that is vaporized and consequently the impulse of the bubble. However, a reduced bubble impulse can still eject drops because:
As previously described with reference to
De-Clogging Pre-Heat Cycles and Humidity
During periods of inactivity, evaporation at the ink-air interface in the nozzle will cause the concentration of the volatile ink component in the ink chamber to decrease as a function of time. Regions of the fluid closer to the ink-air interface will dry out more quickly, so a concentration gradient or depleted region of the volatile component is established near the ink-air interface. As time progresses, the depleted region will extend further towards the heater and the concentration of the volatile component in the fluid immediately in contact with the heater will decrease. The evaporation has two deleterious effects: the viscosity of the ink between the heater and the nozzle will increase, making it harder to push ink through the nozzle, and the volume of vapor generated will decrease, reducing the impulse of the bubble. Eventually, if the nozzle is left too long without firing, the impulse of the bubble explosion will be insufficient to force the fluid through the nozzle and the nozzle will become unable to fire ink. Therefore, the maximum interval between successive firings, before the nozzle becomes clogged, can be determined and monitored by the print engine controller.
A short maximum interval before clogging is undesirable when printing images with a high density nozzle array, as individual nozzles may be used irregularly. Every nozzle should be fired at a frequency less than the maximum interval before clogging. The print engine controller can do this by firing so called “keep wet” drops, i.e. drops fired at a frequency high enough to avoid clogging. However, the dots from keep wet drops can cause printing defects. Ideally, if keep-wet drops are required, they are fired between pages into a spittoon to avoid them appearing on the page. However, with small chamber volumes the viscosity of the ink increases quickly and the maximum time before clogging is typically less than the time to print a page. In this case, the keep-wet drops need to be fired onto the page. The Applicant's work in this area has found that if the density of dots from keep-wet drops is low enough, they are not visible to the human eye. To achieve this, the print engine controller (PEC) monitors the keep-wet times of every nozzle and ensures that the density keep-wet dots on the page is less than 1 in 250, and that these dots are not clustered. This effectively avoids any artifacts that can be detected by the eye. However, if the keep-wet times of the nozzles permit, the PEC will keep the density of keep-wet times below 1 in every 1000 drops.
In addition to having a keep-wet strategy to avoid clogging during operation, it is helpful to have a strategy to recover clogged nozzles: this may be useful when the printer is turned on after an idle period. The Applicant has found two recovery strategies that are particularly effective:
These strategies can generally recover nozzles that have been left for up to a day uncapped in a dry environment. The explanation behind their success lies in the strong viscosity vs temperature profile of the ink components. For example, the viscosity of water is halved by heating from 20° C. to 50° C. The heating compensates for the increase in viscosity caused by evaporation. In the case of the first strategy the ink is gently warmed with a low DC current. In the second strategy (which is more compatible with the CMOS drive circuitry) the fire pulses themselves provide the warming with each unsuccessful firing of a clogged nozzle, the small amount of heat retained in the heater after firing will dissipate into the volume of fluid which failed to eject from the ink chamber, raising its temperature a small amount with each firing until eventually its viscosity drops below the limit for successful ejection. Thus after a number of attempted firings (typically less than 30) the clogged nozzle may successfully fire, restoring the nozzle to operation: from this point onwards the nozzle can be fired at the minimum keep-wet frequency to prevent clogging from occurring again.
The 17 kHz frequency of the warming pulses was empirically determined to be optimum for the devices, which have a chamber diameter of 30 μm. This frequency corresponds to a 1/17 kHz=59 μs pulse period. The length scale for heat diffusion in water in this time is (4*59×10−6 s*ki/ρiCi)1/2=58 μm, while the length scale for heat diffusion in the glycerol humectant (which remains behind after the water has evaporated) is 48 μm. Thus it appears the ideal warming pulse interval should exceed the time scale for heat diffusion across the ink chamber, to ensure the entire volume of fluid to be ejected is heated. The warming pulse interval should not significantly exceed the time scale for heat diffusion, as that will allow the heat to dissipate away from the chamber, in which case the fluid temperature will not build up to the optimum point at the required rate and may even have a negative effect in causing increased evaporation. The optimum temperature for a water based ink is considered to be 50° C.-60° C.: high enough to lower the viscosity significantly from the room temperature value, but low enough to avoid increasing the evaporation rate significantly and low enough to avoid outgassing of dissolved air in the ink.
Note that as soon as ejection is restored with the 17 kHz pulse train, the temperature of the ink in the nozzle will settle at the value determined by self cooling: it does not matter that the heaters are being fired particularly quickly, as an advantage of self cooling is that the steady state fluid temperature is largely independent of the firing rate. As long as the time taken to refill the nozzles after firing is low enough, firing the nozzles at 17 kHz once they have declogged will not cause a problem. The Applicant's nozzles typically refill within 20 μs, so 17 kHz ejection is well within their capability.
The number of pulses in the pulse train is a compromise between the effectiveness of the declog cycle and ink wastage: too few pulses and the ink may not increase in temperature enough to declog; too many pulses and a lot of ink will be wasted if ejection is restored early in the declog cycle. Thirty pulses give the nozzles ample opportunity to declog, given the total amount of energy involved: if the nozzles are not declogged after 30 pulses, more pulses are unlikely to help.
A nozzle which has been left for a very long time may not be successfully restored to operation by the above strategies, as the reduction in viscosity provided by the warming cycle may not be sufficient to compensate for the increase in viscosity caused by evaporation. In this case a third strategy is required. The Applicant's nozzles have been shown to be recoverable in these circumstances when the ambient relative humidity is raised above 60%. At this level of humidity, the humectant in the ink takes up enough water from the atmosphere to reduce the viscosity of the ink in the chamber to an ejectable level. A humid environment may be supplied by two methods:
The first method could be used continuously to prevent clogging from occurring during operation, as the humid environment will reduce the evaporation rate, decreasing or eliminating the need for keep-wet drops. Alternatively, it could be used sparingly as a remedial measure, in conjunction with one of the warm-and-fire declog cycles, to recover clogged nozzles. Either way, the method has the advantage of not requiring the application of a capping mechanism, so it would not interrupt printing.
The second method could not be used to prevent clogging during printing, but could be used to prevent clogging during idle periods. It could also be used as a remedial measure to recover clogged nozzles: the capping mechanism could be applied, then a warm-and-fire declog cycle could be used. This would require that printing be stopped however, so printers without the humid air will generally require the keep-wet drops to prevent clogging.
As discussed above, the PEC can guarantee that during operation, each nozzle will be fired at an interval not more than the keep-wet time of the ink in the nozzles, where the keep-wet time is measured at what is considered the worst-case ambient humidity for the printer's operation. The PEC may also try to fire any, keep-wet drops between pages if possible, thereby reducing the density of the keep-wet drops that get printed to the page.
Humid air may be blown across the nozzles to prevent clogging or increase the keep-wet time, thereby avoiding or reducing the need for keep-wet drops.
Furthermore a capping mechanism can provide a humid environment for storage of the print head during idle times, with a humidity that is high enough to allow recovery of the nozzles prior to printing using one of the warm and fire declog methods.
In the preferred embodiment, the warm and fire cycle used to declog the nozzles prior to printing is a ˜17 kHz burst of ˜30 pulses.
A DC offset may also be applied to the firing pulses, to provide a steady warming current, along with a set of firing pulses that will eject the ink as soon as the warming current reduces the ink viscosity to an ejectable level.
Prevention of Cavitation Using Heater Shape
As described above, after a bubble 12 has been formed in a printhead according to an embodiment of the present invention, the bubble collapses towards a point of collapse 17. According to the feature presently being addressed, the heater elements 10 are configured to form the bubbles 12 so that the points of collapse 17 towards which the bubbles collapse are at positions spaced from the heater elements. Preferably, the printhead is configured so that there is no solid material at such points of collapse 17. In this way cavitation, being a major problem in prior art thermal inkjet devices, is largely eliminated.
Referring to
In a standard prior art system as shown schematically in
Typically, such a protective layer 57 is of tantalum, which oxidizes to form a very hard layer of tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5). Although no known materials can fully resist the effects of cavitation, if the tantalum pentoxide should be chipped away due to the cavitation, then oxidation will again occur at the underlying tantalum metal, so as to effectively repair the tantalum pentoxide layer.
Although the tantalum pentoxide functions relatively well in this regard in known thermal ink jet systems, it has certain disadvantages. One significant disadvantage is that, in effect, virtually the whole protective layer 57 (having a thickness indicated by the reference numeral 59) must be heated in order to transfer the required energy into the ink 11, to heat it so as to form a bubble 12. Not only does this increase the amount of heat which is required at the level designated 59 to raise the temperature at the level designated 60 sufficiently to heat the ink 11, but it also results in a substantial thermal loss to take place in the directions indicated by the arrows 61. As discussed earlier with reference to equation 3, this disadvantage would not be present if the heater element 10 was merely supported on a surface and was not covered by the protective layer 57.
According to the feature presently under discussion, the need for a protective layer 57, as described above, is avoided by generating the bubble 12 so that it collapses, as illustrated in
The generation of the bubble 12 so that it collapses towards a point of collapse 17 where there is no solid material can be achieved using heater elements 10 corresponding to that represented by the part 10.34 of the mask shown in
The bubble 12 is thus substantially disc-shaped. When it collapses, the collapse is directed so as to minimize the surface tension surrounding the bubble 12. This involves the bubble shape moving towards a spherical shape as far as is permitted by the dynamics that are involved. This, in turn, results in the point of collapse being in the region of the hole 63 at the center of the heater element 10, where there is no solid material.
The heater element 10 represented by the part 10.31 of the mask shown in
The heater element 10 represented as the part 10.36 of the mask shown in
Transition Metal Nitride Heater Materials
The metal nitride bonds of transition metal nitrides have a high degree of covalency that provides thermal stability, hardness, wear resistance, chemical inertness and corrosion resistance. The metallic bonding in some transition metal nitrides such as TiN and TaN can in addition result in low resistivity, making these nitrides suitable for use as CMOS driven resistive heaters.
In U.S. Ser. No. 10/728,804 to the present Applicant (one of the cross referenced documents listed above) the heater material described was TiN, a columnar crystalline nitride used in CMOS fabs as a barrier layer for aluminium metallization, and as a tool coating. TiN has the following advantages as a heater material:
However, without some form of oxidation protection, an uncoated TiN heater will only eject a few tens of thousands of droplets before going ‘open circuit’ (fracturing due to oxidative failure). Likewise, uncoated TaN heaters have inadequate oxidation resistance.
Transition Metal Nitride Heater Materials with a Self Passivating Component
The Applicant resolved the oxidation problem by introducing an additive that allows the transition metal nitride to self passivate. As previously discussed ‘self passivation’ refers to the formation of a surface oxide layer, where the oxide has a low diffusion coefficient for oxygen so as to provide a barrier to further oxidation.
The heater elements used in this test were suspended beams: these would normally be fully immersed in ink, but in this case, the ink chambers were deliberately left unfilled so that the heaters could be pulsed in air. This was done to isolate the oxidative failure mechanism. Each heater was pulsed at 5 kHz with 1 μs 330 nJ pulses. This amount of energy would normally be delivered mostly to the ink. Without the ink there was no diffusive loss and most of the input energy contributed to raising the heater temperature. The time scale for cooling due to conduction out the ends of the heater was measured to be ˜30 μs: fast enough to cool the heater to the background printhead IC (chip) temperature between pulses, but not fast enough to significantly reduce the peak heater temperature reached with each pulse. With a heater area of 164 μm2 and heater thickness of 0.5 μm, the 330 nJ input energy of each pulse was sufficient to raise the heater elements to ˜1000° C.
To further prove than the difference in heater lifetime in air was due to different oxidation rates and not a difference in mechanical properties, the above tests were repeated with DC current, to avoid the repeated expansion and contraction caused by pulsing the current. Again, the TiAlN heaters had vastly improved lifetime compared to TiN heaters supplied the same amount of power. When the TiN heaters were coated with a 300 A layer of Si3N4, the lifetimes with DC current became comparable, indicating Si3N4 provides effective oxidation protection. This Si3N4 layer quickly cracked and peeled when the heater were pulsed however, due to a difference in coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE).
In terms of ejection performance, the TiAlN heaters again had vastly improved longevity. Uncoated 120 μm2*0.5 μm TiAlN heaters suspended in ink 4 μm directly beneath the ejection nozzle typically eject several hundreds of millions of ink drops compared to several tens of thousands of drops for uncoated TiN heaters or TiN heaters coated in 300 A of Si3N4. In the light of the above experiments discussing oxidation, the improved longevity over TiN results from the improved oxidation resistance of TiAlN, which arises from a self passivating Al2O3 layer.
The cavitation resistance of TiAlN has been investigated with extensive open pool testing of non-suspended heaters bonded to SiO2 substrates. In these tests the heater was not shaped to avoid the collapse of the bubble on the heater: stroboscopic imaging indicated that the bubble was in fact collapsing on the heater. Despite this, none of the pitting traditionally associated with cavitation damage was observed, even after 1 billion nucleating pulses in water. The high ˜25 GPa hardness of TiAlN provides excellent cavitation resistance on TiAlN. Thus the use of TiAlN heaters (in addition to removing the oxidation protection layers) allow removal of the cavitation protection layer, even without a mechanism designed to avoid bubble collapse, such as shaped heaters. As a result, use of this material facilitates a dramatic increase in ejection efficiency.
In the long term ejection and open pool testing, the ultimate failure mechanism of the TiAlN heaters was cracking across the heater, causing an open circuit. On one device, this occurred after 7 billion pulses. The standard deviation in lifetime was quite large, however, so it would be misleading to quote just that figure. In statistical analysis of cracking, it is common to derive reliability figures by plotting lifetime results on the so called Weibull distribution. When this was done, it was determined that 0.5 μm thick, 32 μm long, 4 μm wide TiAlN heaters could reach 80 million bubble nucleations in water in an open pool configuration with 99% reliability.
Exposing the TiAlN heaters to acidic (pH<4) or alkaline (pH>9) environments, or chlorine or fluorine ions, can destabilize the Al2O3 passivating layer. This can lead to stress corrosion cracking and ultimately failure of the element. However, the crack limited lifetime of open pool heaters can be improved by several means:
A 300 A Ta or TaN coating (which also oxidizes readily to form Ta2O5). This layer is sufficiently thin that it increases the ejection energy by less than 10%.
Several other aspects of TiAlN require discussion to replicate this work. Firstly the aluminium content of the TiAl target impacts the oxidation resistance and resistivity, both of which increase monotonically up to ˜60% aluminium content. Beyond this point the phase of the deposited material changes to a form with reduced oxidation resistance. A 50% composition was chosen in the Applicant's work to provide a margin of safety in avoiding this phase change. Secondly, the resistivity increases monotonically as a function of increasing nitrogen flow in the reactive deposition. At a particular nitrogen flow, the resistivity increases sharply as a result of another phase change. The exact nitrogen flow at which this occurs depends on other parameters such as argon flow and sputtering power, so it is best to characterize this effect in a new deposition chamber by running a set of depositions with increasing nitrogen flow or decreasing sputtering power, plotting the sheet resistance of the resulting layers as a function of nitrogen flow or sputtering power. In the Applicant's work, films were deposited on both sides of the phase change associated with nitrogen flow. The resistivity of the low nitrogen material was 2.5 μOhm·m, while the resistivity of the high nitrogen material was 8 μOhm·m. The higher resistivity is preferable for inkjet heaters, as the current density and current will be lower. Therefore, electromigration is less likely to be a problem. Unfortunately, the oxidation resistance of the high nitrogen material was worse: with 1 hour treatments at 400° C., heaters made from the high nitrogen material increased in resistance 5%, compared to 0.4% for heaters made from the low nitrogen material. As a result, all of the Applicant's work has focused on the low nitrogen material.
Two final aspects of TiAlN are of interest. Firstly, if the material is deposited onto aluminium metallization using reactive sputtering in a nitrogen atmosphere, care must be taken to avoid the formation of an insulating aluminium nitride layer, which will greatly increase the contact resistance. The formation of this interlayer can be avoided by sputtering a thin TiAl layer a few hundred angstroms thick as a barrier layer prior to the introduction of nitrogen into the chamber. Secondly, as with TiN, TiAlN forms columnar crystals. Both of these materials suffer from a growth defect when deposited over non-planar geometry: in the corners of trenches, the columnar crystals on the bottom of the trench grow vertically, while the crystals on the side wall grow horizontally. In this situation, regardless of the deposition thickness, it is possible for the layers on the bottom and side wall to not merge at all, but instead be electrically isolated by a crack that grows at the interface. This can make it difficult to connect the heater material to the CMOS metallization, as it must be deposited into a trench etched in the passivation covering the CMOS metallization. This problem can be overcome by electrically shorting the bottom of the trench to the top of the trench with a metal layer, deposited before or after the heater layer. The metal layer needs to be thick enough to ensure electrical continuity over the step and to ensure its current carrying capacity is high enough to avoid electromigration.
Readers experienced in the art will appreciate that sputtering a composite TiAl target in a nitrogen atmosphere is not the only means by which TiAlN films may be formed. Variations such as the use of CVD deposition, replacing the composite target with co-sputtered Ti and Al targets or using a method other than argon sputtering to sputter the targets do not affect the ability of TiAlN to self-passivate.
Readers experienced in the art will also appreciate that the transition metal of the “transition metal nitride heater materials with a self passivating component” need not be titanium, as other transition metals such as tantalum form conductive nitrides. Also, the self passivating component need not be aluminium: any other additive whose oxidation is thermodynamically favored over the other components will form an oxide on the heater surface. Provided this oxide has a low oxygen diffusion rate (comparable to aluminium oxide), the additive will be a suitable alternative to aluminium.
Nanocrystalline Composite Heater Material
Nanocrystalline composite films are made from two or more phases, one nanocrystalline, the other amorphous, or both nanocrystalline. By incorporating the self passivating transition metal nitrides into a nanocrystalline composite structure, it is possible to further improve hardness, thermal stability, oxidation resistance and in particular crack resistance. For example, it is possible to improve the properties of TiAlN by adding Si to form a TiAlSiN nanocomposite, in which TiAlN nanocrystals are embedded in an amorphous Si3N4 matrix. TiAlSiN has the following advantages over TiAlN:
As with TiAlN, increased nitrogen content can be used to increase the resistivity of TiAlSiN: films in the range 5 μOhm·m to 50 μOhm·m have been tested by the Applicant. As with TiAlN however, the corrosion resistance of the high nitrogen films (>10 μOhm·m in this case) is relatively poor, so again the Applicant has concentrated on the low nitrogen films.
The hardness of TiAlSiN films exhibit a maximum that depends on the grain size of the crystals embedded in the amorphous Si3N4 matrix, which in turn depends on the percentage of silicon incorporated into the film. As the silicon percentage increases from zero, the crystal grain size becomes smaller and the film hardness increases because dislocation movement is hindered, as described by the Hall Petch relationship. As it approaches ˜5 nm, the hardness peaks. If the silicon percentage is increased further, the grain size will reduce further, and the hardness will decrease towards that of the amorphous Si3N4 phase as grain boundary sliding becomes dominant (the reverse Hall Petch effect).
Although high hardness is ideal for cavitation resistance, high fracture toughness is perhaps more relevant to the heater material given the cracking failure mechanism of TiAlN. The fracture toughness of nanocrystalline composite TiAlSiN is higher than the toughness of the constituent phases, because the crystals can terminate cracks propagating in the amorphous phase. Like the hardness, the fracture toughness exhibits a maximum as a function of silicon concentration: too little silicon and the crystal phase will dominate cracking; too much silicon and the crystals will be too sparse or small to terminate cracks, so the amorphous phase will dominate cracking.
It is estimated that the peaks in hardness and toughness lie between atomic Si concentrations of 5% to 20%. Targets made with that concentration of Si, with the balance composed of equal proportions of Ti and Al, can be sputtered in a reactive nitrogen atmosphere to produce the nanocrystalline composite films. As with the TiAlN, the presence of Al is intended to improve the oxidation resistance of the material.
It will be understood by those experienced in the art that the amorphous phase of the nanocrystalline composite does not have to be silicon nitride: any hard, thermally stable alternative with a low oxygen diffusivity (such as boron nitride, aluminium oxide or silicon carbide) will suffice. Also, the nanocrystalline phase need not be a transition metal nitride, as silicides, borides and carbides can also be very hard with low resistivity. Similarly, the transition metal need not be titanium, as other transition metals such as tantalum and tungsten form conductive nitrides. Finally, the self passivating component added to the nanocrystalline composite material need not be aluminium: any other additive whose oxidation is thermodynamically favored over the other components will form an oxide on the heater surface. Provided this oxide has a low oxygen diffusion rate (comparable to aluminium oxide), the additive will be a suitable alternative to aluminium.
Using the Heater as a MEMS Fluid Sensor
The heater can be used as a fluid sensor, using the heater's thermal coefficient of resistance (TCR) to determine temperature and the temperature to determine whether the heater is surrounded by air or immersed in liquid. There are 2 key enabling aspects that allow the heaters of self cooling nozzles to be used in this fashion:
Considering firstly the protective layers: these are typically about 1 μm thick in existing printhead heaters. These layers must be heated to the film boiling temperature to eject a drop, together with a ˜1 μm layer of ink. While the protective layers and the ink are being heated, heat will diffuse about the same distance into the underlayer. The heater thickness is typically ˜0.2 μm so in total, ˜3.2 μm of solid and ˜1 μm of liquid must be heated to the film boiling temperature. The large amount of solid that must be heated makes existing devices inefficient, but it also means the heater cannot easily be used as a fluid sensor, as the portion of heat lost to the fluid is relatively small. The drop in peak heater temperature is at most 1.5% when the ink chamber goes from an unfilled to a filled state (˜25% of the total heat is taken away from the 3.2 μm of solid, of which the heater comprises only 6% by thickness).
Considering now the devices of the present invention, with heaters that have either no coatings or coatings that are thin with respect to the heater (<20% of heater thickness). These heaters have good thermal isolation, being fully suspended or with underlayers that have thermal products (ρuCuku)1/2 less than that of water. If the heater is fully suspended with no protective coatings, there is no solid outside of the heater to heat. If there is no ink present, almost all of the heater will be retained by the heater on the time scale of the input pulse. If there is water based ink present, modelling with equation 3 indicates that ˜30% of the heat will be retained the heater with the remaining ˜70% diffusing into the ink. As a result, the peak heater temperature will drop 70% when the ink chamber goes from an unfilled to a filled state. If the heater has an appreciable TCR, this difference in peak temperature will show up as a difference in heater resistance at the end of the input pulse. If the input voltage is kept constant with a low output impedance drive, this will show up as a difference in current at the end of the input pulse. The change in current can be used to detect the transition of the ink chambers from an unfilled to a filled state.
One point of concern regarding suspended heaters is the temperature they reach when pulsed without ink present. The temperature the heaters must reach to eject water based ink when it is present is ˜300° C. If there is no ink present when an input pulse of the same magnitude is applied, the peak temperature will be 100%/30% higher i.e. ˜1000° C. At this temperature the stability of the heaters becomes a concern: TiN readily oxidises at this temperature, as demonstrated by
The fact that suspended heaters reach 1000° C. when pulsed in air is of some concern: the heaters must be robust against depriming of the ink chambers. One way to address this concern is to use a non-suspended heater with a solid underlayer. In that case, the heater will always be in contact with a solid, regardless of the presence of ink, so the peak temperature will be lower. If the thermal product of the underlayer is comparable to that of water, modelling using equation 3 with a 0.2 μm thick heater predicts ˜35% of the heat would diffuse into the ink if ink were present. Without ink, this 35% would be shared between the heater and the underlayer, which has a thermal length scale of ˜0.7 μm. This would result in a drop in peak heater temperature of only ˜8% when the ink chamber goes from an unfilled to a filled state (˜35% of the total heat is taken away from the 0.9 μm of solid, of which the heater comprises 22% by thickness). With a film boiling temperature of ˜300° C., this implies a peak heater temperature of ˜326° C. if the heater is pulsed with the same energy when ink is not present. The difference in temperature is more difficult to detect given the presence of noise in the measured pulses. Thus, using the heaters to detect the presence of ink is far more practical if the heater is suspended.
This sensor could be applied to any MEMS fluidic device where an electrical means of determining the presence of fluid is desired. This may be required in some devices where automation of filling is required or where visual observation of filling is made impossible by obstruction. The is the case for thermal inkjet printheads and the detection of subsequent de-priming is also very useful.
Of course, it is particularly convenient to use the heaters in a printhead for the dual purpose of droplet ejection and fluid sensing. However, as discussed above, traditional inkjet heater elements are not suitable as fluid sensors because of their thick protective coatings and non-suspended configurations.
An additional benefit of using the heater as a fluid sensor is that the phase change associated with bubble nucleation can be detected: as soon a film boiling occurs, the suspended heater becomes thermally isolated from the fluid it is immersed in, so further input of energy causes the temperature and resistance of the heater to rise more quickly as a function of time. By detecting this inflection point in the resistance vs time curve, the time at which nucleation occurs can be determined for a given input power. This is useful for studying the physics of the device and also useful for systems where visual inspection of the ejected drops is not possible. Experiments with the Applicant's devices show that the inflection point in the resistance vs time curve corresponds to a “saturation point”, where further increases in voltage or pulse length do not increase the droplet velocity any further. This is because the bubble completely envelops the heater when it is formed, preventing the heater from delivering any more energy to the fluid. With a given input voltage, tuning the pulse length so that the inflection point is occurs at the very end of the input pulse allows the pulse length, input energy and peak heater temperature to be electrically minimized
Suspended vs Bonded Heaters
Suspending the heater is not an essential ingredient in producing a self cooling inkjet: as long as the underlayer has a thermal product (ρuCuku)1/2 that is less than or equal to that of the ink, the energy required to nucleate a bubble will be less than or equal to that of a suspended heater. As discussed above, one advantage of depositing the heater on a solid underlayer is the peak temperature of the heater will be very much lower if the heater is fired without ink in the chamber, so the requirements on the thermal stability and oxidation resistance of the heater are less stringent. Other advantages are ease of manufacturing and the fact that the heater can be made thinner because it is supported by a solid underlayer. This reduces the energy required to heat the heater, which makes the nucleation time faster, which also reduces the diffusive loss terms in equation 3. Thus a heater of the same top surface area bonded to a solid underlayer can actually take less energy to nucleate a bubble than a suspended one, especially if the thermal product of the underlayer is significantly less than that of water. The big disadvantage of unsuspended heaters with respect to self cooling inkjets is the loss of half the bubble volume, which will decrease the bubble impulse (force integrated over time) and reduce the keep-wet time.
Heater Elements Formed in Different Layers
In some embodiments, it is useful to have a plurality of heater elements 10 disposed within the chamber 7 of each unit cell 1. The elements 10, which are formed by the lithographic process as described above in relation to
As shown in
Also as will be appreciated with reference to the above description of the lithographic process, each heater element 10.1, 10.2 is formed by at least one step of that process, the lithographic steps relating to each one of the elements 10.1 being distinct from those relating to the other element 10.2.
The elements 10.1, 10.2 are preferably sized relative to each other, as reflected schematically in the diagram of
One known prior art device, patented by Canon, and illustrated schematically in
It will be appreciated that the size of the elements 10.1 and 10.2 themselves are not required to be binary weighted to cause the ejection of drops 16 having different sizes or the ejection of useful combinations of drops. Indeed, the binary weighting may well not be represented precisely by the area of the elements 10.1, 10.2 themselves. In sizing the elements 10.1, 10.2 to achieve binary weighted drop volumes, the fluidic characteristics surrounding the generation of bubbles 12, the drop dynamics characteristics, the quantity of liquid that is drawing back into the chamber 7 from the nozzle 3 once a drop 16 has broken off, and so forth, must be considered. Accordingly, the actual ratio of the surface areas of the elements 10.1, 10.2, or the performance of the two heaters, needs to be adjusted in practice to achieve the desired binary weighted drop volumes.
Where the size of the heater elements 10.1, 10.2 is fixed and where the ratio of their surface areas is therefore fixed, the relative sizes of ejected drops 16 may be adjusted by adjusting the supply voltages to the two elements. This can also be achieved by adjusting the duration of the operation pulses of the elements 10.1, 10.2—i.e. their pulse widths. However, the pulse widths cannot exceed a certain amount of time, because once a bubble 12 has nucleated on the surface of an element 10.1, 10.2, then any duration of pulse width after that time will be of little or no effect.
On the other hand, the low thermal mass of the heater elements 10.1, 10.2 allows them to be heated to reach, very quickly, the temperature at which bubbles 12 are formed and at which drops 16 are ejected. While the maximum effective pulse width is limited, by the onset of bubble nucleation, typically to around 0.5 microseconds, the minimum pulse width is limited only by the available current drive and the current density that can be tolerated by the heater elements 10.1, 10.2.
As shown in
In the prior art described in relation to
Referring once again to the different sizes of the heater elements 10.1 and 10.2, as mentioned above, this has the advantage that it enables the elements to be sized so as to achieve multiple, binary weighted drop volumes from one nozzle 3.
It will be appreciated that, where multiple drop volumes can be achieved, and especially if they are binary weighted, then photographic quality can be obtained while using fewer printed dots, and at a lower print resolution.
Furthermore, under the same circumstances, higher speed printing can be achieved. That is, instead of just ejecting one drop 14 and then waiting for the nozzle 3 to refill, the equivalent of one, two, or three drops might be ejected. Assuming that the available refill speed of the nozzle 3 is not a limiting factor, ink ejection, and hence printing, up to three times faster, may be achieved. In practice, however, the nozzle refill time will typically be a limiting factor. In this case, the nozzle 3 will take slightly longer to refill when a triple volume of drop 16 (relative to the minimum size drop) has been ejected than when only a minimum volume drop has been ejected. However, in practice it will not take as much as three times as long to refill. This is due to the inertial dynamics and the surface tension of the ink 11.
Referring to
The higher curvature of the air bubble 71 in the unit cell 1.1 results in a greater surface tension force which tends to draw the ink 11, from the refill passage 9 towards the nozzle 3 and into the chamber 7.1, as indicated by the arrow 73. This gives rise to a shorter refilling time. As the chamber 7.1 refills, it reaches a stage, designated 74, where the condition is similar to that in the adjacent unit cell 1.2. In this condition, the chamber 7.1 of the unit cell 1.1 is partially refilled and the surface tension force has therefore reduced. This results in the refill speed slowing down even though, at this stage, when this condition is reached in that unit cell 1.1, a flow of liquid into the chamber 7.1, with its associated momentum, has been established. The overall effect of this is that, although it takes longer to completely fill the chamber 7.1 and nozzle 3.1 from a time when the air bubble 71 is present than from when the condition 74 is present, even if the volume to be refilled is three times larger, it does not take as much as three times longer to refill the chamber 7.1 and nozzle 3.1.
Example Printer in which the Printhead is Used
The components described above form part of a printhead assembly shown in
Referring briefly to
A flexible printed circuit board (PCB) 82 is electrically connected to the chip 81, for supplying both power and data to the chip. The chip 81 is bonded onto a stainless-steel upper layer sheet 83, so as to overlie an array of holes 84 etched in this sheet. The chip 81 itself is a multi-layer stack of silicon which has ink channels (not shown) in the bottom layer of silicon 85, these channels being aligned with the holes 84.
The chip 81 is approximately 1 mm in width and 21 mm in length. This length is determined by the width of the field of the stepper that is used to fabricate the chip 81. The sheet 83 has channels 86 (only some of which are shown as hidden detail) which are etched on the underside of the sheet as shown in
The lower layer 90 has holes 98 opening into the channels 89 and channel 91. Compressed filtered air from an air source (not shown) enters the channel 91 through the relevant hole 98, and then passes through the holes 92 and 93 and slots 95, in the mid layer 88, the sheet 83 and the top channel layer 96, respectively, and is then blown into the side 99 of the chip assembly 81, from where it is forced out, at 100, through a nozzle guard 101 which covers the nozzles, to keep the nozzles clear of paper dust. Differently colored inks 11 (not shown) pass through the holes 98 of the lower layer 90, into the channels 89, and then through respective holes 87, then along respective channels 86 in the underside of the upper layer sheet 83, through respective holes 84 of that sheet, and then through the slots 95, to the chip 81. It will be noted that there are just seven of the holes 98 in the lower layer 90 (one for each color of ink and one for the compressed air) via which the ink and air is passed to the chip 81, the ink being directed to the 7680 nozzles on the chip.
The lower layer 105 is of silicon and has ink channels etched in it. These ink channels are aligned with the holes 84 in the stainless steel upper layer sheet 83. The sheet 83 receives ink and compressed air from the lower layer 90 as described above, and then directs the ink and air to the chip 81. The need to funnel the ink and air from where it is received by the lower layer 90, via the mid-layer 88 and upper layer 83 to the chip assembly 81, is because it would otherwise be impractical to align the large number (7680) of very small nozzles 3 with the larger, less accurate holes 98 in the lower layer 90.
The flex PCB 82 is connected to the shift registers and other circuitry (not shown) located on the layer 102 of chip assembly 81. The chip assembly 81 is bonded by wires 106 onto the PCB flex and these wires are then encapsulated in an epoxy 107. To effect this encapsulating, a dam 108 is provided. This allows the epoxy 107 to be applied to fill the space between the dam 108 and the chip assembly 81 so that the wires 106 are embedded in the epoxy. Once the epoxy 107 has hardened, it protects the wire bonding structure from contamination by paper and dust, and from mechanical contact.
Referring to
The printhead assembly 19 includes eleven of the printhead modules assemblies 80, which are glued onto a substrate channel 110 in the form of a bent metal plate. A series of groups of seven holes each, designated by the reference numerals 111, supply the 6 different colors of ink and the compressed air to the chip assemblies 81. An extruded flexible ink hose 112 is glued into place in the channel 110. It will be noted that the hose 112 includes holes 113 therein. These holes 113 are not present when the hose 112 is first connected to the channel 110, but are formed thereafter by way of melting, by forcing a hot wire structure (not shown) through the holes 111, which holes then serve as guides to fix the positions at which the holes 113 are melted. When the printhead assembly 19 is assembled, the holes 113 are in fluid-flow communication with the holes 98 in the lower layer 90 of each printhead module assembly 80, via holes 114 (which make up the groups 111 in the channel 110).
The hose 112 defines parallel channels 115 which extend the length of the hose. At one end 116, the hose 112 is connected to ink containers (not shown), and at the opposite end 117, there is provided a channel extrusion cap 118, which serves to plug, and thereby close, that end of the hose.
A metal top support plate 119 supports and locates the channel 110 and hose 112, and serves as a back plate for these. The channel 110 and hose 112, in turn, exert pressure onto an assembly 120 which includes flex printed circuits. The plate 119 has tabs 121 which extend through notches 122 in the downwardly extending wall 123 of the channel 110, to locate the channel and plate with respect to each other.
An extrusion 124 is provided to locate copper bus bars 125. Although the energy required to operate a printhead according to the present invention is an order of magnitude lower than that of known thermal ink jet printers, there are a total of about 88,000 nozzles in the printhead array, and this is approximately 160 times the number of nozzles that are typically found in typical printheads. As the nozzles in the present invention may be operational (i.e. may fire) on a continuous basis during operation, the total power consumption will be an order of magnitude higher than that in such known printheads, and the current requirements will, accordingly, be high, even though the power consumption per nozzle will be an order of magnitude lower than that in the known printheads. The busbars 125 are suitable for providing for such power requirements, and have power leads 126 soldered to them.
Compressible conductive strips 127 are provided to abut with contacts 128 on the upperside, as shown, of the lower parts of the flex PCBs 82 of the printhead module assemblies 80. The PCBs 82 extend from the chip assemblies 81, around the channel 110, the support plate 119, the extrusion 124 and busbars 126, to a position below the strips 127 so that the contacts 128 are positioned below, and in contact with, the strips 127.
Each PCB 82 is double-sided and plated-through. Data connections 129 (indicated schematically by dashed lines), which are located on the outer surface of the PCB 82 abut with contact spots 130 (only some of which are shown schematically) on a flex PCB 131 which, in turn, includes a data bus and edge connectors 132 which are formed as part of the flex itself. Data is fed to the PCBs 131 via the edge connectors 132.
A metal plate 133 is provided so that it, together with the channel 110, can keep all of the components of the printhead assembly 19 together. In this regard, the channel 110 includes twist tabs 134 which extend through slots 135 in the plate 133 when the assembly 19 is put together, and are then twisted through approximately 45 degrees to prevent them from being withdrawn through the slots.
By way of summary, with reference to
Mounting holes 137 are provided for mounting the printhead assembly 19 in place in a printer (not shown). The effective length of the printhead assembly 19, represented by the distance 138, is just over the width of an A4 page (that is, about 8.5 inches).
Referring to
Printer System
Referring to
Shown in the block diagram is the printhead 141, a power supply 142 to the printhead, an ink supply 143, and print data 144 (represented by the arrow) which is fed to the printhead as it ejects ink, at 145, onto print media in the form, for example, of paper 146.
Media transport rollers 147 are provided to transport the paper 146 past the printhead 141. A media pick up mechanism 148 is configured to withdraw a sheet of paper 146 from a media tray 149.
The power supply 142 is for providing DC voltage which is a standard type of supply in printer devices.
The ink supply 143 is from ink cartridges (not shown) and, typically various types of information will be provided, at 150, about the ink supply, such as the amount of ink remaining. This information is provided via a system controller 151 which is connected to a user interface 152. The interface 152 typically consists of a number of buttons (not shown), such as a “print” button, “page advance” button, and so on. The system controller 151 also controls a motor 153 that is provided for driving the media pick up mechanism 148 and a motor 154 for driving the media transport rollers 147.
It is necessary for the system controller 151 to identify when a sheet of paper 146 is moving past the printhead 141, so that printing can be effected at the correct time. This time can be related to a specific time that has elapsed after the media pick up mechanism 148 has picked up the sheet of paper 146. Preferably, however, a paper sensor (not shown) is provided, which is connected to the system controller 151 so that when the sheet of paper 146 reaches a certain position relative to the printhead 141, the system controller can effect printing. Printing is effected by triggering a print data formatter 155 which provides the print data 144 to the printhead 141. It will therefore be appreciated that the system controller 151 must also interact with the print data formatter 155.
The print data 144 emanates from an external computer (not shown) connected at 156, and may be transmitted via any of a number of different connection means, such as a USB connection, an ETHERNET connection, a IEEE1394 connection otherwise known as firewire, or a parallel connection. A data communications module 157 provides this data to the print data formatter 155 and provides control information to the system controller 151.
Referring to
Alternatively, the drive circuitry 22 for one unit cell is not on opposing sides of the heater element that it controls. All the drive circuitry 22 for the heater 14 of one unit cell is in a single, undivided area that is offset from the heater. That is, the drive circuitry 22 is partially overlaid by one of the electrodes 15 of the heater 14 that it is controlling, and partially overlaid by one or more of the heater electrodes 15 from adjacent unit cells. In this situation, the center of the drive circuitry 22 is less than 200 microns from the center of the associate nozzle aperture 5. In most Memjet printheads of this type, the offset is less than 100 microns and in many cases less than 50 microns, preferably less than 30 microns.
Configuring the nozzle components so that there is significant overlap between the electrodes and the drive circuitry provides a compact design with high nozzle density (nozzles per unit area of the nozzle plate 2). This also improves the efficiency of the printhead by shortening the length of the conductors from the circuitry to the electrodes. The shorter conductors have less resistance and therefore dissipate less energy.
The high degree of overlap between the electrodes 15 and the drive circuitry 22 also allows more vias between the heater material and the CMOS metalization layers of the interconnect 23. As best shown in
In
The heater element 10 is configured to accommodate thermal expansion in a specific manner. As heater elements expand, they will deform to relieve the strain. Elements such as that shown in
Referring to
The omega shape directs current flow around the axis of the nozzle aperture 5. This gives good bubble alignment with the aperture for better ejection of drops while ensuring that the bubble collapse point is not on the heater element 10. As discussed above, this avoids problems caused by cavitation.
Referring to
The unit cell 1 shown in
Other designs use three or more elements in the chamber. Gas bubbles nucleate from opposing sides of the nozzle aperture and converge to form a single bubble. The bubble formed is symmetrical about at least one plane extending along the nozzle axis. This enhances the control of the symmetry and position of the bubble within the chamber 7 and therefore the ejected drop trajectory is more reliable.
Although the invention is described above with reference to specific embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the invention may be embodied in many other forms. For example, although the above embodiments refer to the heater elements being electrically actuated, non-electrically actuated elements may also be used in embodiments, where appropriate.
The present application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/202,988, filed on Sep. 2, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,891,764, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/097,309, filed Apr. 4, 2005, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,448,729, herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4990939 | Sekiya et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5132711 | Shinada et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5581281 | Fuse | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5617121 | Tachihara et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5833772 | L'Estrade et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5966153 | Mitani et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6003977 | Weber et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6231153 | Elgee | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6286923 | Sugahara | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6336713 | Regan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6375312 | Ikeda et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6482574 | Ramaswami et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6536882 | Hawkins et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6598960 | Cabal et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6818959 | Montelius et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6951384 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 7070262 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7611218 | Silverbrook | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 20030173647 | Montelius et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001121 | Kameda et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040090495 | Delametter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100527 | Silverbrook | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263547 | Sugahara | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20070081029 | Worsman et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20090009558 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 62-94347 | Oct 1985 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| Accuratus, “Silicon Carbide”, Nov. 2, 2002, [online] Retrieved from Internet URL: http://www.accuratus.com/silicar.html, pp. 1-2 Zbigniew Suszynski, Miroslaw Malinski and Leszek Bychto, “Thermal Parameters Measurement Method of Electronics Materials”, Sep. 1998, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology—part A, vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 425-426. |
| Zbigniew Suszynski, Miroslaw Malinski and Leszek Bychto, “Thermal Parameters Measurement Method of Electronics Materials”, Sep. 1998, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology—part A, vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 425-426. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100103216 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12202988 | Sep 2008 | US |
| Child | 12652683 | US | |
| Parent | 11097309 | Apr 2005 | US |
| Child | 12202988 | US |
