Mental Health Assessment and Dynamic Referral for Oncology (MHADRO)

Information

  • Research Project
  • 7669777
  • ApplicationId
    7669777
  • Core Project Number
    R42MH078432
  • Full Project Number
    2R42MH078432-02A1
  • Serial Number
    78432
  • FOA Number
    PA-08-051
  • Sub Project Id
  • Project Start Date
    9/20/2006 - 18 years ago
  • Project End Date
    6/30/2012 - 12 years ago
  • Program Officer Name
    GRABB, MARGARET C.
  • Budget Start Date
    7/16/2009 - 15 years ago
  • Budget End Date
    6/30/2010 - 14 years ago
  • Fiscal Year
    2009
  • Support Year
    2
  • Suffix
    A1
  • Award Notice Date
    7/16/2009 - 15 years ago

Mental Health Assessment and Dynamic Referral for Oncology (MHADRO)

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): According to the American Cancer Society, approximately 1.3 million people are diagnosed with cancer each year, with the annual cost of treating cancer exceeding $60.9 billion. Mental health and psychosocial factors associated with cancer are poorly recognized and under-treated. The Mental Health Assessment and Dynamic Referral for Oncology (MHADRO) enables oncology treatment providers to efficiently screen for and monitor five important patient care domains, including: (1) mental health functioning;(2) cancer-related physical symptoms/side effects;(3) the patient-provider partnership;(4) barriers to treatment;and (5) adherence with medical regimen and lifestyle change recommendations. The MHADRO's individualized summary reports help oncology treatment providers to decide whether and how to intervene when clinically elevated mental health symptoms are present or when a patient reports a desire for treatment or support. Patients who choose the dynamic referral have their summary report, an authorization to release information, and their personal contact information electronically transmitted to a credentialed mental health provider, who is then responsible for contacting the patient to discuss treatment options. This process utilizes secure, HIPAA-compliant transmittal technologies. Phase 2 specific aims are: (1) Make design improvements based on Phase 1 results;(2) Test the improved MHADRO with a field trial of 30 patients selected from three participating oncology treatment centers;and (3) Evaluate the effectiveness of the MHADRO during a single blind, randomized controlled trial of 1,000 mixed cancer patients. Patients will be randomly assigned to the Intervention Group (n=500) or the Control Group (n=500). All subjects, regardless of group assignment, will undergo the same assessment procedures at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months post-baseline. Those assigned to the Intervention Group will have their Healthcare Provider Reports printed at each of the five assessments. These reports will be reviewed by their oncology treatment team and a treatment plan will be developed for distressed patients. The patient will receive a Patient Feedback Report, which will be reviewed with him or her by a trained research coordinator (a healthcare professional). During the assessment, the Intervention Group subjects will be given the opportunity to obtain more information on available psychosocial support groups and offered a dynamic referral to a psychiatrist, mental health counselor, and/or smoking cessation program. Subjects assigned to the Control Condition will undergo the same five MHADRO assessments. However, their reports will not be printed, nor will they be offered the mental health referrals or psychosocial support group information. Rather, they will be managed using the standard of care provided at the site (i.e., treatment-as-usual). We will use Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) and Linear Mixed Modeling (LMM) to examine group differences in distress over time, while adjusting for potential confounding variables such as illness severity and phase of treatment. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Several national organizations, including the National Comprehensive Care Network, the National Cancer Institute, and the Institute of Medicine, have advocated routine screening for psychological distress among cancer patients and have emphasized the central role of building a collaborative patient-provider partnership to address psychosocial issues. The lack of consistent assessment of psychosocial factors and the patient-provider partnership is a significant problem with far-reaching consequences, including excess suffering, impaired quality of life, treatment dissatisfaction, and treatment non-adherence. The MHADRO has the potential to impact these outcomes through identifying distressed patients, helping the team decide what action should be taken, strengthening the patient-provider partnership, producing a personalized patient feedback report, facilitating mental health treatment engagement, and monitoring patients'response to treatment.

IC Name
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH
  • Activity
    R42
  • Administering IC
    MH
  • Application Type
    2
  • Direct Cost Amount
  • Indirect Cost Amount
  • Total Cost
    471692
  • Sub Project Total Cost
  • ARRA Funded
    False
  • CFDA Code
    242
  • Ed Inst. Type
  • Funding ICs
    NIMH:471692\
  • Funding Mechanism
    SBIR-STTR
  • Study Section
    ZRG1
  • Study Section Name
    Special Emphasis Panel
  • Organization Name
    POLARIS HEALTH DIRECTIONS, INC.
  • Organization Department
  • Organization DUNS
    143621105
  • Organization City
    Langhorne
  • Organization State
    PA
  • Organization Country
    UNITED STATES
  • Organization Zip Code
    19047
  • Organization District
    UNITED STATES