This invention relates to an article for merchandise labeling and more particularly to an article that has a labeling tag flatly conjoined along a unifying flat bond zone with a flexible elastic layer that includes an elastic fastening loop.
The prior art is replete with merchandise labeling using bands about merchandise. Sometimes the heretofore known bands have elastic sections united to non-elastic sections, and sometimes they are endless elastic bands commonly called rubber bands.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,516,292 (Bennett) of Jul. 25, 1950 teaches a preformed labeling band of elastic and non-elastic sections for holding bananas constantly under tension as they shrink. The ends of the elastic and non-elastic sections of the band are overlapped and adhesively or otherwise bonded together. U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,652 (Stowman et al.) of Mar. 31, 1998 discusses banding of merchandise by a technique involving in situ bonding of the ends of a strip of elastic material with or without an interposed separate strip of material that is not necessarily elastic. In situ bonding, however, involves carrying bonding equipment to the site where banding of merchandise is to be done (e.g., for bonds formed by heat sealing) or involves removing and disposing of a release liner at the site of banding (e.g., for bonds formed by using liner-protected contact or pressure-sensitive adhesive layers). Neither approach is ideal for field application of labels. Also, when either a preformed band of bonded sections or an in situ formed band of bonded sections is stretched about merchandise, it exerts a compressive force on the merchandise. Relatively strong bonds are needed to prevent bond separation under such circumstances since the bonds are in the line of stretching and are subjected to the tension of stretching during use. A still further problem is the questionable reliability for UPC bar codes on stretched bands encircling merchandise.
Where endless bands of rubber (commonly called rubber bands) are used as in teachings of U.S. Pat. No. 5,617,656 (Ludlow et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,697,177 (Ludlow et al.); and U.S. Pat. No. 6,058,639 (Tinklenberg), a second step arises for attaching the tag. The two-step approach is not the most desirable although it has been one of the more popular approaches in the past because the tag is distinct from the rubber band and can carry reliable UPC bar coding that is easy to handle at checkout scanning.
Heretofore, the only known merchandise marking article capable of single-step application to achieve simultaneous banding and absolutely scan-reliable bar-coding of merchandise is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,778,583 (Larsen) of Jul. 14, 1998, where the tag is attached to the rubber band by encircling a section of the tag about the rubber band prior to the time the rubber band is fastened in banding condition about merchandise. Economy is not a hallmark for the manufacture of this prior art article.
In short, a one-step process using an economical unitary product for reliable and simultaneous tagging and banding of merchandise, including for tagging and banding clumps of agricultural produce, is much desired by industry and has been much sought after for a very long time.
The new merchandise labeling article of this invention relies upon entirely new physical features and relationships. Significantly, the new article is sheet-like throughout. It has a labeling tag and an elastic fastening loop conjoined along a unifying flat bonding zone. The loop extends away from the tag.
Despite the fact that the loop lacks the physical appearance of the usual rubber band, it can function much the same as a rubber band in holding a clump of merchandise together and thus effectively band merchandise. Ideal tagging products of this invention can have an easily scanned UPC bar code on the tag portion.
A very interesting feature of the preferred new article becomes apparent when the fastening loop is stretched around merchandise. The stretch and contraction forces exerted in the loop are, for the most part, not strongly transmitted into the bonding zone between the tag and the loop. This permits the bond at the bonding zone to be relatively reduced in strength as compared to the bond in the line of stretch of a band.
Many other novel advantages, features, and relationships will become apparent as this description proceeds.
It first should be noted that
Referring to
The width of the tag 12 between its sides 12A and 12B in the bond zone 14 and the width of the elastic layer 16 in the bond zone are preferably about equal.
The flexible elastic fastening loop 20 has an internal edge circumference 26 that defines the boundary of the hole through the loop as well as the inside edge circumference of the loop. The outer edge or boundary of the loop can be looked upon as its outer circumference 28. Both boundaries for the sides of the loop lie in the flat plane of the elastic layer 16, and thus the sides 22 of the loop (being part of the elastic layer) are also properly looked upon as flat. To summarize, the elastic fastening loop has flat loop sides 22; and those sides define the loop and its inner or internal edge circumference 26 and its outer or external edge circumference 28. The outer circumference includes a section that merges into the bond zone 14.
The distal end 32 of the loop is the end furthest from the bond zone 14, and the proximal end 34 of the loop is closest to the bond zone. The proximal end of the inner circumference 26 may itself optionally (but not preferably) merge into the bond zone. Ideally, the proximal end 34 of the inner circumference 26 is spaced from the nearest edge 13 of the bond zone 14. The farthest edge 15 of the bond zone 14 is most remote from the loop. The edges 13 and 15 of the bond zone 14 should be looked upon as schematically illustrated in the drawing simply because the unification between an overlapped edge of the tag 12 and an overlapped edge of the elastic layer 16 can take a variety of forms, including those that may make the nearest edge 13 of the bond zone as well as the farthest edge 15 of the bond zone somewhat irregular or even greatly irregular.
Nevertheless, the distance between the proximal portion of the inner circumference 26 and the nearest edge 13 of the bond zone is most preferably sufficient to provide a zone 30 which can be called a dispersion zone. Its function is to disperse at least some of the in-line tension forces created as a result of the stretching of an elastic loop about merchandise. Those tension forces are called “in-line” tension forces because they are in the line of stretching of the loop. Dissipation of such tension forces is desirable at least to some extent so as to reduce (or sometimes even substantially eliminate) the stress of that tension passing into the bond zone 14.
The interesting thing about the new labeling article of the invention is the fact that substantial dispersion or even dissipation of those in-line tension (i.e., stretching) forces can take place in the dispersion zone so as to quite significantly temper or reduce the stress those forces put on the bond zone 14.
Ideally, the dispersion zone 30 should be at least as deep (i.e., “wide” in the direction away from the bond zone) as about half the narrowest width (see 22A) of the loop sides, and preferably should be somewhat larger, such as at least about equal to the narrowest width of the loop sides. Effective dispersion function generally requires some minimal distance between the proximal end of the inner circumference 26 and the nearest edge of the unifying bond zone 14. The minimum distance should be at least about 50 mils (preferably more) even for the narrowest of practical widths for elastic loops in the practice of the invention. More appropriately, the minimal distance between the proximal end of the inner circumference 26 and the bond zone 14 should be about ⅛ inch or 125 mils—and preferably that distance will be greater than ⅛ inch or 125 mils—for what is perceived to become the most popular of the new labeling articles of the invention. The greater the distance of the dispersion zone 30, the more likely lateral tensioning forces in a stretched loop (as illustrated in
It is appropriate to emphasize that the proximal end of the inner circumference 26 of the loop 20 is preferably distanced from the bond zone 14 by the dispersion zone; and when shoulder 18 is present, the proximal end of the inner circumference 26 should be more distant from the bond zone 14 than the optional shoulder 18 that contributes to forming the lateral indentations that in turn form the neck 24 of constricted width for the elastic layer 16.
Features in
Referring to
The thickness of tags for practicing the invention should be great enough to give some body effect but ideally will not be greater than necessary for carrying appropriate information to describe a product or whatever item the tag is designed to identify. The tag should be in the form of a continuous panel of sheet material, although tags with holes in them are within the ambit of the invention. Suitable sheet material for tags is preferably relatively thin, generally not over about 15 or 20 mils (i.e., 0.015 or 0.020 inch) in thickness (although thicknesses up to 30 or 40 mils can be used where cost is no object). The tag material should be flexible and pliable but is most preferably not elastic for most applications. Of course, UPC codes on elastic materials can sometimes perform satisfactorily for scanning purposes, but uncertainty as to reliability for that performance has to be considered. (A stretchy but non-elastic material such as the polyolefin thermoplastic printable microporous product called “Teslin” from PPG Industries of Pittsburgh, Pa. can sometimes be used as tag material for the new article of the invention where pulling distortion of the tag is expected to be only nominal, or zero. Use of “Teslin” is not preferred because it can be stretched by hand pulling and is extremely slow in any tendency to return to its original, shape. It lacks the bounce-back feature of elastic material.) For the most part, the tag material preferably should, be sufficiently non-stretchy under hand-applied forces that a UPC scannable code is not rendered unreliable for scanning. Thus, the sheet material should have the dimensional stability to carry a reliably scannable (i.e., non-distorted) print of a UPC code as well as other easily read markings.
The sheet material for the tag also preferably should be sufficiently water resistant to not disintegrate and not significantly pucker or wrinkle or otherwise disfigure or deform when placed in water. In fact, not only the sheet material but also the printing on it, and especially any scannable product identification matter on it, should ideally be sufficiently water resistant to avoid disintegration or destruction when repeatedly subjected to water and washing operations (as is common for produce displays in supermarkets). The sheet material for the tag also should be somewhat tough in the sense of being sufficiently tear resistant to deter damage to it from customer handling.
Useful materials for forming the tag sheet material include paper (which is not preferred), polystyrenic thermoplastics (which are among those preferred especially when composed or treated for good printing ink reception) as well as polyolefinic thermoplastics, polyesters, and others that exhibit the properties discussed (which can vary depending on how the new article of the invention is to be used in the marketplace). Thermoplastic materials are best to use, and polymers of styrene, ethylene, propylene, as well as a variety of other monomers and mixtures of monomers (e.g., to make co-polymers and ter-polymers, etc.) can be used. Sheet thickness for polyester plastics and some others can be quite thin, even down to the 3 or 4 mil range, and still exhibit the toughness and the practical non-elasticity desired. The polymers may be formulated so that printing inks are readily accepted on the surface of the sheet material or treated with special surface treatments to effect acceptance of printing inks. The exact structure and composition of suitable tag sheet material for practicing the invention can vary widely.
Any of a variety of commercially available inks compatible or accepted on a tag sheet and retained thereon, and in any desired color, may be used to print the markings and details of the information portion of the tag. Such technology is readily understood in the art. (If it should be desired to use water-soluble ink markings, a thin film of water-insoluble plastic may be applied over them to enhance water resistance.) High-impact polystyrene sheets are especially useful as tag material. To improve impact properties toward the high end, a styrene-butadiene-styrene impact modifier can be useful in amounts up to about 40 percent of the weight of the polystyrene itself. Tags of such material are highly stable against stretching of the type that will damage scannability for bar codes. They have desired flexibility balanced by a slight stiffness that contributes to ease of handing during manufacture of the new product and also to ease of handling during use of the new product, including scanning of a UPC code at check-out counters. Such tags also can be reliably printed, especially when first subjected to a surface treatment such as, for example, a corona treatment such as available from Pillar Technologies of Hartland, Wis., a division of Illinois Tool Works. The treatment is said to enhance wettability and adhesion characteristics of plastic substrates to inks and adhesives. It cannot be overemphasized that, where reliably scannable UPC markings are critical, the tag portion of the new sheet-like product should be substantially non-elastic, that is, sufficiently non-elastic to avoid the risk of unscannable distortion for the code.
The size of the front and rear surfaces of the tag 12 for the new article can vary depending on the purpose for which the new article is being formed. For the most part, tags 12 having front and rear areas (rectangular, square, oval, etc.) of at least about 1 square inch are preferred, although even smaller tag areas may be used when minimal printing on the tag is to be employed. Generally, the size of tags is no greater than that necessary to carry the informational matter to be printed on the tag, such as a scannable UPC code, PLU numbers, any product description, illustration, or the like, as well as any special trademarks or source markings, addresses, and phone numbers, etc. The more popular tags are apt to a have a size of at least about 1½ or 2 square inches up to about 3 or 4 square inches, although larger sizes can, of course, be used. Sizes above about 6 or 7 square inches, however, are likely to be rare. Nevertheless, tags as large as 10 square inches or even 15 or 20 square inches are contemplated as within the scope of the invention.
The elastic portion of the new product will generally have a layer thickness that is greater than the thickness of the tag portion by at least about 20 percent up to about four or even five or six times the thickness of the tag portion (as for example where tags having a thickness of only about 6 or 8 mils are employed). Preferably the thickness of the elastic layer that extends away from the tag will have a thickness greater than about twice the thickness of the tag, but usually will not exceed about 30 or 35 mils when the tag thickness lies in what is expected to be the popular range of about 5 to about 10 mils. It is conceivable, of course, to form the new product with a tag thickness and elastic layer thickness approximately equal (especially where one employs fusion bonding for the bond zone between the tagging material and the elastic material). It is also conceivable to use elastic layer thicknesses up to but not usually greater than 100 mils. (In articles where the bond zone reveals the thickness of the tag as well as the elastic layer, the elastic layer generally should be at least as thick as the tag or even at least twice the thickness of the tag in that bond zone.) Because strong need exists to make useful product in the most economical manner, the amount of material (for thickness and size) used in making the product should be kept to a minimum for satisfactory functional results. Thus, tag thicknesses generally will fall below 10 mils; and the elastic layer, while usually thicker, will generally fall in the range of 15 to 30 mils in thickness.
In all instances, the loop is part of the elastic layer (even though composition may vary) and generally will be of the same thickness as the part of the elastic layer extending out from the bond zone part of the tag. The width (e.g., see 22A) of the sides defining the fastening loop of elastic material will be greater than, and generally at least two or three or five times (and even 10 or 20 times) greater than, the thickness of those sides.
The sides of the loop should have sufficient elastic strength to permit stretching of the loop to an inner circumferential size at least three times greater than the relaxed unstretched inner circumferential size of the loop, and this stretching should be accomplished without fracture for practical products of the invention. The relaxed unstretched inner circumference 26 will vary depending on the size of the opening desired for the loop. The relaxed unstretched inner circumference may range from as little as about 1.5 inches (rarely smaller) up to possibly 5 inches (rarely larger). But the relaxed unstretched inner circumference within the scope of the invention is not limited to the more popular range. Thus, the lower limit of size for the relaxed unstretched inner circumference may be as low as about 0.5 inch or less for some useful products (as for flower work), and the upper limit of size for the relaxed unstretched inner circumference for other useful products may be as great as 10 or 20 or more inches. Generally, the relaxed unstretched inner circumference 26 will not exceed about 6 or 8 or possibly 10 inches for most products, except, of course, for the marking of large-diameter products such as melons. (One must keep in mind that the term “circumferential” is equally apt to describe an edge of an oval or elliptical or a varied similar shape as well as a purely circular or approximately circular shape.)
Ideally, the width 22A of the flat loop sides that define the fastening loop will, at all portions of those sides, be at least 1/10th of an inch or 100 mils (although narrower widths can have specialized uses). The most ideal widths are those that are adequate to insure some degree of strength for the loop as it is placed about merchandise (especially clumped merchandise such as onions or asparagus, etc.) for the purpose of holding the merchandise together. The best widths for flat loop sides thus preferably fall within the range of at least 100 mils (generally at least about ⅛ inch or 125 mils) up to about ½ inch or about 500 mils for elastic layer thicknesses, especially those between about 0.012 inch or 12 mils and 0.030 inch or 30 mils—with the width relatively greater for the thinner thicknesses and relatively less for the greater thicknesses being possible—all to insure adequate loop strength for stretching and retraction about merchandise without causing overuse of material to make the product.
Materials for forming the elastic layer including the elastic loop of it are rubber-like in character. In short, they should bounce back from a stretched condition relatively quickly, but absolutely instantaneous retraction or bounce back to an original relaxed condition after stretching is not always critical for functional elastic performance. Substantially instantaneous retraction to a loop inner circumferential condition no greater than 5 percent above the original unstretched loop inner circumference condition can suffice for a multitude of uses. A substantially instantaneous loop retraction is accomplished when, after relaxation from having been momentarily stretched to a predetermined extent, it takes no more than 3 seconds for the loop to retract (bounce back) to an inner circumference size no more than 5 percent greater than the inner circumference of the original unstretched loop. A momentarily stretched condition is one where the stretch is not held for more than 2 or 3 seconds and the predetermined extent of the stretch is three times (or more) the inner circumference of the loop in unstretched relaxed condition. There may be occasions where retraction may take more than 2 or 3 seconds (up to possibly 5 or 10 seconds) and still may constitute sufficiently speedy retraction to be useful as elastic material in practicing the invention. Those skilled in the art of elastic performance features are well aware that they should select elastomers for the elastic stretch and retraction characteristics required for a particular job they want performed.
In selecting elastomers for the elastic layer, substantially instantaneous retraction is most preferred for rapid clumping of products (because slower retraction may well cause some product to fall out of the clump before retraction takes place). On the other hand, a modestly slower retraction may be quite adequate where new labeling article of the invention is to be stretched about a single product under conditions where speed of retraction (bounce back) is reliable but not the dominant consideration. Of course, the most ideal products of the invention will exhibit almost instantaneous retraction from momentary stretching.
A variety of elastomers giving satisfactory elasticity and stretchability can be useful in practicing the invention. The ideal elastomers are those that are thermoplastic in that they are at least heat softenable and even heat meltable to a flowable or moldable state. A multitude of thermoplastic elastomers are known and more are being created every day. One of the more common families of thermoplastic elastomers is the styrenic block co-polymers. This family includes styrene-butadiene styrene and styrene-ethylene-butylene styrene. Another family of useful thermoplastic elastomers is the olefinic elastomers including those that are ethylene as well as those that are polypropylene based (e.g., where interposed different monomer blocks are not used but blocks of different tacticity—atactic and isotactic—are created by using metallocene catalysis polymerization). Yet another family of thermoplastic elastomers are known as polyvinyl chloride-based elastomers. Still other families of thermoplastic elastomers can be based on urethanes, nylon, silicon, etc. Selection of elastomer is generally made on the basis of cost, and with due attention to bonding characteristics for the tag material selected. Tag material selection is best advised to be from polymers in the same family as the elastomer such as those made up using at least some monomers related to or the same as those present in the elastomer chosen for the elastic layer. Elastomers that cost more are selected only when their special properties are considered functionally important for a particular article of the invention designed for specialized use.
More on elastomers is contained in three pages entitled “Elastomers” and four pages entitled “Thermoplastic Elastomers,” all printed Jan. 28, 2004 from the web site of the Department of Polymer Science, University of Southern Mississippi—all incorporated herein by reference. A print of these pages was filed with our provisional application, and a print is separately filed with the filing of this application.
A common practice in handling polymeric materials, whether elastomeric or otherwise, is to add compatible (i.e., readily blendable) ingredients to achieve coloration, opacification, resistance to degradation on exposure to some environments, improved impact properties and adhesion properties, etc., all as well known to those skilled in the polymer chemistry arts.
Usually, the elastomeric layer will be substantially uniform in composition throughout its extent (although an elastomer—or mixture of elastomers—forming the loop portion may be different from an elastomer at the bond zone provided the two elastomers blend into a reliable unity at their interface). On the other hand, the tag portion of the new article of the invention may in fact be a laminate of different layers, including a possible protective coating over a printed layer, especially a printed layer that is believed to need further protection against smudging or destruction. Generally, the bond zone is formed by overlapping edges of the tag and the elastomeric layer. The overlap can be rather extensive if desired (even up to or approaching an inch) but generally need not be greater than about ½ inch or possibly ⅜ inch. Most (but not all) articles are expected to have tags no greater than about 4 or 5 or 6 square inches in size and elastomeric layers that extend out as the elastomeric fastening loop a distance from the bond zone about 1 inch up to about 4 inches or possibly 5 inches, and the overlap for the bond zone for such tags generally need not exceed ½ inch, or even not exceed ¼ inch. Overlaps as narrow as ⅛ inch may sometimes be successfully used, but such narrow overlaps at the bond zone may create trouble. Sometimes people may pull on the tag 12 as they work to place the loop 20 about merchandise, and once the new article is on merchandise, those concerned about checkout scanning may well modestly pull on the tab for that scanning operation. Sometimes customers will mildly pull on the tab in an effort to learn more about the nature of the new article or the merchandise carrying it. These possibilities suggest against using overlaps that are significantly less than about ¼ inch.
The type of unification between the tag material and the elastic layer can affect the size of the overlap needed for the bond zone and will normally be selected by taking into consideration the particular material or materials of the tag and the particular composition of the elastomeric layer to be conjoined at the bond zone. Heat welding as by applying heat and pressure on overlapping thermoplastic polymeric materials forming the tag and the elastic layer can be useful. Significant heat at the interface of overlapping thermoplastic polymeric materials can also result in complete fusion between the polymer of the tag and the polymer of the elastic layer. Sonic welding is another way to unify the layers and achieve a cohesive bond between compatible parts. Laminating a molten elastomer to a molten (or at least softened) tag composition by co-extrusion is another way of forming the bond zone. This method can be particularly effective where molecules or parts of molecules of the tag polymer and the molten elastomer at the bond zone interdiffuse with each other and get tangled up before being frozen (i.e., before being cooled to a non-flowable state). Bonds can also be formed by interposing an intermediate layer at the bond zone (e.g., a hot melt bonding adhesive) to which both the tag material and the elastomeric layer material will readily bond because of their compatibility to the intermediate material. Still further, special treatment of the surface areas where bonding is to be accomplished can be effective. Even mechanical bonding can be effective, as where the tag material is porous (e.g., paper and the porous polymer product called “Teslin”), and the elastomeric layer is applied in molten condition or at least in a softened condition and pressed into the voids or interstices of the porous tag layer.
In short, the invention contemplates any useful bonding technique and structure that will conjoin the labeling tag with the elastomeric layer in a manner forming a unifying flat bond zone that can withstand (without separation) the pulling force (as expected in use) between a tag and elastic layer. The pulling force normally expected in use may be as little as 1 pound, and the bond should be able to withstand at least such a pulling force for 10 seconds. Bonds capable of withstanding pulling forces of at least 2 pounds for 10 seconds, or even at least 3 or 4 or 5 pounds of pulling force for 10 seconds without rupture (breaking apart) of the bond zone, are preferred. In use, it is not the pulling force per unit area or per cross-sectional area that counts. It is the overall resistance of the entire bond zone to separation. Thus, these low pulling forces are per article of the invention, not per linear unit or any area unit. Such is a relatively low requirement for bond strength. Most likely, the greatest pulling force (tag gripped at one end and elastic loop at the other for pulling in opposite directions) is apt to be momentarily encountered (for no more than 10 seconds and usually much less) and probably only encountered during affixing of the tag about merchandise.
A useful bonding consideration is polymer bonding at the bond zone. It essentially amounts to an adjustment of the materials (e.g., tag and elastomer materials) and adjusting the exact interface characteristics of the materials. Generally, similar materials tend to bond together (as by polymer bonding) better than dissimilar materials; and materials of like polarity usually bond better than materials of unlike polarity. Surface treatments such as corona treatments also help to improve bonding. Still further, compatibilizers that adjust the polarity of material can be used to improve bonding.
A notable product of the invention has a high-impact polystyrene tag and an elastic portion formed using a styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) block co-polymer available from GLS Corporation under the tradename “Kraton D-2104.” This co-polymer has several beneficial features such as high clarity, good dimensional stability, food contact acceptability, relatively high strength, low viscosity, ease of coloring, and high elongation. To improve its adhesion to a styrenic tag substrate, an optional addition of up to 10 percent by weight of polystyrene (based on the weight of the elastomer in the composition) may be blended in the elastomer composition. The composition can easily be colored, as for example by using polystyrene base color concentrates from Clariant (located at 9101 International Parkway, Minneapolis, Minn. 55428) or by using polyethylene base color concentrates from Ampacet (located at 660 White Plains Road, Tarrytown, N.Y. 10591) at concentrations of up to about 5 percent (or even more but more is unnecessary) of the weight of the base styrene-butadiene-styrene block co-polymer.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that any suitable process for the manufacture of the new labeling articles of the invention can be employed. Batch processing is useful for extremely limited production runs. Conveyor processing with indexing from station to station for specific operations in putting each discrete product together can be useful (especially for uniquely designed or shaped tags or elastic layers).
Web-based processing may be the most ideal from the standpoint of economy. For example, after giving a high impact polystyrene web (preferably about 8 mils thick and stained for color and any degree of opacity) a surface treatment such as the well-known corona surface treatment, the web is repetitively printed with informational matter as intended for each tag to be later cut from it. The printed (styrenic) tag material web is fed simultaneously with molten elastomer (e.g., a thermoplastic elastomer such as styrenic block copolymer) through the nip of chill rollers. The molten elastomer is applied to extend with a sufficient overlap onto the lateral edges of the web to create the bond zone as well as to extend sufficiently laterally outward from the bond zone (i.e, lateral edge of web) to provide material for the elastic loop. The temperatures of the chill rollers (from about 200 degrees Fahrenheit to about 40 degrees F.) is adjusted to cool the molten elastomer to a “frozen” state while simultaneously applying pressure by the rollers (up to about 500 psi) to effect the formation of a layer of elastomer at the thickness desired and also to effect formation of the bond zone. The outermost edge of the elastomeric layer is longitudinally cut off to create an even edge, following which the lateral and longitudinal positioning of the composite web (of tag and elastomer) is controlled as it is passed in proper registration between die cutting and anvil rollers to cut and score individual tag profiles that are then severed into individual tags of the invention.
The structure of the new labeling article of the invention is believed to be totally strange from anything that has been contemplated in the past. The new article is flexible and sheet-like in character throughout its entire extent, but the labeling tag part of the new structure is of a composition different from the elastic part of the new article. Different properties for different parts of the article, while maintaining a sheet-like character for the entire article (albeit of optionally different thicknesses in different parts) has given results that are looked upon as somewhat astonishing in view of merchandise labels that have been known and available in the past. There appears to have been nothing heretofore to suggest the unique arrangement of elements to get the special performance characteristics exhibited by the new product.
Speedy application of the new article to merchandise in a single tagging step can be accomplished in a variety of ways. For factory operations, the new labeling articles may be stacked or sequenced by conveyor to a mechanical applicator. Hand application at a variety of off-factory sites can be easily accomplished. A person can align the loops of the tag on some carrier so as to make each labeling article quickly and conveniently accessible for hand application. Some may align a multitude of articles on their arms; others may align on some sort of movable carrier. Some may just place the new labeling article in a bag and grab from the bag in affixing the labeling article on merchandise. Many are apt to use the fingers of both hands to stretch the elastomeric loop in placing it about merchandise, but others may exert some pull on the tag portion as they place the loop about merchandise. Nevertheless, the bond zone is not likely to ever receive the extremes of strain and stress that the elastic fastening loop itself is likely to receive.
The new article (when made resistant to water damage) is very useful for field application of it to agricultural product even before the produce is washed. But it obviously can conveniently be applied to washed agricultural produce. Further, the new labeling article has a multitude of other uses because of its unique properties and ease of attachment (i.e., fastening on merchandise). Elongated manufactured products can easily be clumped using the new article. Slender necked bottles (as for soft drinks, beer, ketchup, syrup, etc.) can readily carry the new labeling article—and circular loops are especially advantageous for this use. Floral arrangements can easily be labeled using the new labeling article. After being looped about merchandise, the pulling forces against the bond zone 14 are mighty low, and indeed may even be insignificant, inasmuch as dispersion and even dissipation of loop in-line stretching tension takes place with the result that the bonding zone is subjected to little stress even though the elastic loop is in stretched condition about merchandise.
Further, those skilled in the art will readily recognize that this invention may be embodied in still other specific forms than illustrated without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics of it. The illustrated embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description, and all variations that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced thereby.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/875,099, filed on May 1, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/207,120, filed on Aug. 10, 2011, which are incorporated by reference in their entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/207,120 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/638,433, filed Dec. 15, 2009, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,011,127. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/638,433 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/861,003, filed Sep. 25, 2007, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,640,687. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/861,003 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/895,177, filed Jul. 20, 2004, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,281,345. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/895,177 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/542,153, filed Feb. 4, 2004.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60542153 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15400194 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 16001189 | US | |
Parent | 14803473 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15400194 | US | |
Parent | 14103204 | Dec 2013 | US |
Child | 14803473 | US | |
Parent | 13875099 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14103204 | US | |
Parent | 13207120 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13875099 | US | |
Parent | 12638433 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13207120 | US | |
Parent | 11861003 | Sep 2007 | US |
Child | 12638433 | US | |
Parent | 10895177 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 11861003 | US |