The subject matter of the present application may also be related to the following U.S. patent applications: “Location Data Validation by Static Entities Receiving Location Data Items by Short-Range Communication,” Ser. No. 10/057,741, filed Jan. 23, 2002; “Location Data Diffusion and Location Discovery,” Ser. No. 09/905,774, filed Jul. 13, 2001; and “Location Data Dissemination and Reception for Entities Having Short-Range Receivers,” Ser. No. 10/057,742, filed Jan. 23, 2002.
The present invention relates to passing a message, via mobile entities equipped with short range communication devices, to a target receiver at a known location.
A number of technologies exist for the short range communication of information between mobile devices. These technologies include infra-red based technologies and low-power radio technologies (including, in particular, the recent “Bluetooth” short range wireless standard). Depending on the technology implementation, differing types of message propagation will be enabled including asynchronous message broadcast, and multicast and point-to-point duplex connections established after coordination and negotiation between communicating devices.
One possible use for such short-range technologies is the transmission of local information to passers-by equipped with mobile devices having short-range transceivers, the local information being, for example, transmitted by a shop to inform the passers-by of current promotions. Another use is in location beacons that transmit location information to passers-by.
It is known, for example from EP-A-0,948,222, to diffuse information amongst users by short range wireless links so that a user need not be in range of an originating transmitter in order to receive the information sent out by the latter. Such an arrangement is likely to be particularly useful in environments such as shopping malls, city centers, tourist attractions, theme parks or any other location where large numbers of users carrying mobile devices with short-range transceivers are likely to be in one locality. Another important area of application is the diffusion of information between devices fixed in cars.
It can be seen that information can be rapidly diffused among the population of mobile-device users in the general vicinity of the source 10. So, the process of diffusion takes advantage of both the short range wireless technology and the movement of the users carrying the devices.
By applying appropriate diffusion-limiting mechanisms (for example, by assigning the original information a total time to live of, for example, 10 minutes), the information will generally only be diffused in the vicinity of the originating point 10. This makes the diffusion process appropriate for the diffusion of location relevant information that is primarily of use only in the vicinity of point 10. Such location relevant information can include location data enabling a receiving device to obtain at least a rough idea of its location (though, of course, a number of technologies such as GPS and cellular radio already exist by which a mobile device can determine its position and, indeed, its direction of travel).
Whilst the general diffusion of information between mobile entities is appropriate for contacting people indiscriminately, it is not the most efficient way for one mobile entity to pass a message to a particular target entity.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a more efficient way for using mobile entities equipped with short-range transceivers for passing a message to an entity at a known location.
According to the present invention, there is provided a method of passing a message to a target receiver at a known location, wherein the message is carried towards the target receiver by one or more mobile entities that receive and pass on the message by short-range communication, the message including an indication of the location of the target receiver, and at least one of the mobile entities is used to carry the message only following a determination that its direction of travel is appropriate to progress the message on its way to the target receiver.
The present invention also encompasses mobile entities for implementing the foregoing method.
Message passing methods and a message-carrying mobile device implementing these method, all embodying the invention, will now be described, by way of non-limiting example, with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings, in which:
The functional elements of the mobile device 20 comprise:
The mobile device 20 permits a user to send a message to a short-range receiver at a known location—this may be an unprompted message or a response to a message received from or about that location. For example, the user may receive, via device 20, a promotional message from a store at a location indicated in the message, e.g. “Product x is currently being promoted at half price in store y” (the store identity being a location indicator as it can be used to look up geographic coordinates of the store in a locally or remotely held table); the user may decide to send a reply message (“Reserve one of this product for me”) or even in some applications have the device automatically send a reply.
By way of example, pedestrian K (
In accordance with the present invention, an approach is therefore adopted whereby K's message is only carried by mobile devices going in a direction likely to progress the message on its way to its destination T; as will be seen, this does not necessarily mean that every device used to carry the message is actually moving generally in the direction of T since it may be expedient to first transport the message to a location from where it is more likely to be carried, or to be carried quickly, to T. As multiple devices 20 are likely to be involved in transferring the message to its destination location, the message itself should include the destination location (or at least an indicator of that location). The general form of a message 40 to be passed between devices 20 is shown in
For convenience, in the further description of the operation of mobile device 20 given with reference to
The determination of whether a mobile device 20 passing close to K should be used to carry K's message can be effected either by K's mobile device or by the passing mobile device (or, indeed, by both devices in cooperation). In the case of the
Of course, for a device 20 carried by a vehicle, in view of the winding nature of many roads, the direction of travel should be based on an average over a reasonable distance (for example, a mile); it is also prudent to adopt a similar approach for devices carried by pedestrians (but with a lower averaging distance) since even in open spaces, pedestrians often do not walk in a straight line to their intended final destination.
In
K's message is stored in memory 30 in a message list 31 that holds messages being carried and, for each message, the following meta data:
The message-list maintenance block 25 is responsible for maintaining the message list as follows. At frequent intervals, for each message in the list 31, the block 25:
A staging post is a location where messages can expect to be able to find a device (or other means) that will take the message towards T. A staging post might, for example, be a freeway intersection or, as will be seen below with reference to
Upon another mobile device passing close to K, K's device 20 receives direction of travel information from the receive-control block 24 of the passing device 20 and, preferably, also an indication whether or not the passing device is vehicle borne. The send control block 23 then looks at each message in message list 31 to determine whether it would be useful to copy the message to the passing device. This determination is done as follows. First, a message is not considered for transfer unless either its “pass-on” flag is set or, where the device 20 holding the message is pedestrian borne, the passing device is detected as being a vehicle and therefore likely to get the message to its destination more quickly. The device 20 can know if it is pedestrian borne either because this is pre-specified (e.g. by device type or user input) or as a result of a speed of movement measurement made by the device using location data from unit 27 and elapsed time between two location readings).
If send control block 23 determines that a message is a candidate for transfer, it works out the direction from the device's current location to the message's target destination and compares this with the received direction information from the passing device; if these two directions are within a predetermined angular range of each other, the message is copied across to the passing device. If, however, the two directions are not within the predetermined angular range, the send-control block repeats the process taking as the message destination location the location of any staging post identified in the staging-post identification data associated with the message. If the direction to any such staging post is outside the predetermined angular range to the direction of travel of the passing device, the send control block terminates its consideration of the current message without copying it to the passing device.
The receive control block 24 of the passing device receives each copied-across message, stores it in its message list and sends an acknowledgment back to the sending device. The send control block of the sending device is triggered by this acknowledgment to increment the pass count of the corresponding message in its message list. As a variant, it is possible to arrange for the receive-control block 24 to examine the received message and make a determination (based on whatever criteria are judged appropriate, such as message size) whether it accepts to carry the message—if it doesn't then it does not acknowledge message receipt.
Returning to a consideration of the
Vehicle L carries the message but as it is not actually going past T, there quickly comes a point where the current direction from L to T is outside of the direction range 115. As a result, the pass-on flag associated with the message in L′ device 20 is set to indicate that the message should be copied to any passing device moving in a more appropriate direction. In due course, at time t1, vehicle Q is encountered and L passes it the message—since Q is moving in the general direction of T so that the direction from the meeting point of L and Q to the target T falls within the angular direction range 116 of Q for accepting messages, Q accepts the message and continues on its way. In due course, at time t2, Q passes close by T and transfers the message directly to T.
Where a mobile device 20 has passed on a message at least a predetermined minimum number of times (one or more) and has ceased to move in an appropriate direction, the maintenance block 25 can be arranged to delete the message from message list 31.
Rather than waiting for the direction to the target T to go out of angular direction range for the carrying device 20, the carrying device can continuously look to pass on the message to any entity traveling in a direction more closely corresponding to the direction of T than its own direction of travel. Again, it is preferable for the message-passing entity to receive feedback on the success of any message passing operation.
Advantageously, the decision as to whether it is an appropriate for a passing device to carry a message is made not simply on the basis of direction data, but also taking into account map data that might show that the current direction of travel of the passing device, whilst being generally towards T, is actually leading to a cul-de-sac or other route which would not get to T. It is therefore possible that an appropriate direction of travel for the receiving devicey is actually in a direction away from the target destination—what is relevant here is whether the map route distance to T is being reduced by travel in the direction being taken by the receiving entity.
Upon target T receiving the message from K, T may decide to send an acknowledgement or return message towards the last known location of K (this location having been included for example in the message sent by K). Alternatively, if the message from T included a message identifier, this identifier could be included by T in a subsequent broadcast by T of location-relevant information, there being at least a possibility that the identifier will reach K and serve as a message acknowledgement.
Whilst the scenario depicted in
Many other variations are, of course, possible to the above-described arrangements. For example, with regard to the maps held by the mobile entities, the map data may be stored semi-permanently in the devices. Alternatively, the map data can be automatically downloaded—for example, when a pedestrian carrying a mobile device enters a shopping mall. A third possibility is that the map data is sent to mobile entities using diffusion.
It will be appreciated that any suitable coordinate system can be employed for specifying locations; for example a latitude/longitude based coordinate system can be used or a locally defined coordinate system (the latter potentially being more appropriate for use in an environment such as a shopping mall or theme park).
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0017460.7 | Jul 2000 | GB | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5375161 | Fuller et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5428544 | Shyu | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5652570 | Lepkofker | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5748147 | Bickley et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5787359 | Nagata | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5850609 | Sugarbroad et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5875400 | Madhavapeddy et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5987011 | Toh | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5990833 | Ahlbom et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6047183 | Kingdon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6078818 | Kingdon et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078826 | Croft et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6104712 | Robert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6130881 | Stiller et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6167276 | Pite | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6212133 | McCoy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6236335 | Goodwin, III | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246883 | Lee | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6313786 | Sheynblat et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327533 | Chou | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6411891 | Jones | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6473031 | Harris | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6477353 | Honda et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6492944 | Stilp | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6549625 | Rautila et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6704283 | Stiller et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6725051 | Fidler | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 20010053669 | Kado et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020119788 | Parapudi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163912 | Carlson | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 199 03 909 | Aug 2000 | DE |
| 0 913 965 | May 1999 | EP |
| 0 948 222 | Oct 1999 | EP |
| 1 133 115 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 2 338 374 | Dec 1999 | GB |
| 2 339 356 | Jan 2000 | GB |
| 2 342 018 | Mar 2000 | GB |
| 2 344 723 | Jun 2000 | GB |
| 2 360 914 | Oct 2001 | GB |
| 2 364 203 | Jan 2002 | GB |
| 9812862 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 9946899 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 9965152 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| 0023816 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| 0150151 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| 0163316 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20020009971 A1 | Jan 2002 | US |