1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a message handling process and a message processing system, which may be used to deal with unsolicited and unapproved electronic messages.
2. Description of the Related Art
Electronic messaging, particularly the use of e-mail over the Internet, has been enthusiastically adopted by large numbers of people, who have taken advantage of the inherent efficiencies and convenience of electronic messaging. One unfortunate consequence of Internet e-mail, however, has been the proliferation of unsolicited and unwanted e-mail messages, often referred to as “spam”, which people receive. Various methods have been developed to restrict or prevent spam from reaching intended recipients. The methods have included both technical and legal measures which to date have met with mixed results. None have eliminated the problem of spam, nor prevented “spammers” from sending their messages and seeking to subvert the measures.
One of the technical measures includes applying a spam filter which processes an incoming message to determine whether it should forwarded to the recipient or not. The disadvantage associated with such filters is that inevitably useful messages for the recipient are inadvertently filtered and never received.
It is desired to provide a method and system which provides a useful alternative or which allows management of unsolicited messages without seeking to simply restrict or filter incoming messages.
The present invention relates to a message handling process, including:
determining if a message is approved for the recipient of the message;
processing the message for subsequent viewing by the recipient if the message is approved; and
notifying the recipient and storing the message if the message is unapproved.
The present invention also provides a message processing system, including:
means for determining if a message is approved for the recipient of the message;
means for processing the message for subsequent viewing by the recipient if the message is approved; and
means for notifying the recipient and storing the message if the message is unapproved.
The present invention also provides a message processing system, including:
an electronic message server for receiving and storing electronic messages for a recipient; and
an electronic message manager for processing electronic messages for a recipient to determine if the electronic messages are approved based on stored criteria, sending approved electronic messages for the recipient to a location for access by the recipient, and storing and sending a notification to the recipient of unapproved messages.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is hereinafter described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A message processing system 2, as shown in
A user of the system 2 is able to access the system 2 via a communications network 4 using a standard computer 6 with a web browser. The communications network 4 may be, for example, the Internet or a LAN. For instance, the system 2 may be part of a corporate intranet, and act as a gateway for the intranet to the Internet. The system 2 may also be controlled by a service provider simply providing an e-mail service via the Internet. The service provider can then service any users which can connect via the Internet, including the users of corporate networks. Users, including companies, which use the system are registered and identified as being users by the e-mail manager 10. All e-mails for the users are then directed to the system 2.
The message handling method executed by the system 2, and in particular the e-mail manager 10, is shown in
If it is determined at step 16 that the message is not approved, then the system 2 notifies the recipient, at step 18, that it has disallowed a received message for the recipient. The recipient can be notified by a number of communications methods, such as by e-mail or by a telephone call over the network 4. On receipt of the notification at step 18, the recipient can direct their web browser to the web server 8 and view a list of disallowed messages. From the list, the user can execute a number of actions, such as read the message, select a sender of a message to be added to the approved list stored by the e-mail manager 10 or simply delete messages.
At step 18, the sender of an e-mail that has been disallowed by the system 2 is notified by e-mail that their message has been held in a pending mailbox because they were not on the recipient's list of authorised e-mail senders. The sender is also informed by e-mail that if they wish to ensure that the recipient reads the e-mail, the sender should use other means, such as telephone, to inform the recipient that they have been sent an e-mail and ask that the recipient add the sender's e-mail address to the recipient's list of authorised senders.
The e-mail manager 10 uses the e-mail server 12 to send the notifications at step 18 by e-mail, and the e-mail for the recipient includes a URL for the web server 8. A recipient can then respond to the notification by selecting the URL and pointing the browser to the web server 8. The e-mail manager 10 determines at step 24, after a predetermined period of time, whether or not the recipient has ignored the notification sent by e-mail. If the notification is ignored, the system 2 sends a return e-mail, at step 26, notifying the sender that the sent message has not been the read by the recipient. The message is then deleted at step 30.
If the recipient responds to the e-mail notification so as to direct the recipient's browser to the system 2, the browser communicates with the web server 8 which sends a web page, designated by the URL. The web page displays a list of messages not approved by the e-mail manager 10 with the recently sent message being highlighted or selected. The e-mail manager 10 then enters a loop which allows a number of functions to be executed. At step 28 the e-mail manager 10 determines whether the recipient has selected on the web page an option to add the sender of the highlighted message to the approved list maintained by the e-mail manager 10. If not, operation of the e-mail manager 10 proceeds to step 32, otherwise the e-mail manager 10 will update the recipient's approved list to add the sender, at step 34, and then proceed to step 32. At step 32, the e-mail manager 10 determines whether the recipient has chosen an option on the web page to read the highlighted message, and if not, operation proceeds to step 31. Otherwise, the message is displayed at step 36 for the recipient's browser, and operation proceeds to step 31. At step 31, the manager determines whether the recipient has selected an option on the web page to save the highlighted or read message, and if so, operation proceeds to step 33 to save the message. At step 33, the forward procedure is called to execute step 17 for the message and proceed to either step 20 or 22 to save the message and then return to the loop. At step 35, the e-mail manager 10 determines whether the recipient has selected an option to delete the highlighted or read message. If so, the message is deleted at step 37, and operation returns to the loop. At step 39, a determination is made, based on activity of the recipient, as to whether the recipient has directed its browser away from or closed the web page, and if so, the loop is exited and operation ends at step 40.
The e-mail manager 10 also executes scheduled tasks 42 to delete unapproved messages on which no action has been taken by recipients for a predetermined period of time, and notify senders as in step 26. Alternatively, the scheduled tasks may be set for a recipient so that unapproved messages on which no action has been taken for a predetermined period of time are stored or saved automatically by calling the forward procedure to execute step 17 and proceed to either step 20 or 22.
The above system 2 and management method are particularly advantageous as they provide users with the capability to manage unsolicited or unapproved e-mail messages without having the messages inadvertently removed by a message filter. The management facilities provided by the system 2 are web browser based, and provides significant additional management services to users of browser based e-mail services, such as those provided by Hotmail and Yahoo.
Many modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention as herein described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/745,561, filed Jan. 18, 2013, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/009,575, filed Aug. 6, 2002, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,289 on Jan. 22, 2013, which is the U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/AU00/00454, filed May 12, 2000, which claims the benefit of Australian Provisional Patent Application No. PQ 0302, filed May 12, 1999, all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4928145 | Okamoto | May 1990 | A |
| 4932826 | Moy et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 5560008 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5619648 | Canale et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5696898 | Baker et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5717923 | Dedrick | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5758083 | Singh et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5805810 | Maxwell | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5819092 | Ferguson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5826022 | Nielsen | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5889958 | Willens | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5905777 | Foladare et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5923848 | Goodhand et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958005 | Thorne et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6052709 | Paul | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6076101 | Kamakura et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6108688 | Nielsen | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112227 | Heiner | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6182118 | Finney et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6192396 | Kohler | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6199102 | Cobb | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212553 | Lee et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6230188 | Marcus | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6237037 | Larsson | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6266692 | Greenstein | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6275850 | Beyda et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6289212 | Stein et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6314454 | Wang et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6317648 | Sleep et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6321267 | Donaldson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324569 | Ogilvie et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6335963 | Bosco | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6345281 | Kardos et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6363427 | Teibel et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6366950 | Scheussler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377978 | Nguyen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6393464 | Dieterman | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6421709 | McCormick et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430562 | Kardos et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6460050 | Pace et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6480855 | Siefert | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6480885 | Olivier | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487586 | Ogilvie et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6496855 | Hunt et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6522945 | Sleep et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6606647 | Shah et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6615242 | Riemers | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6625257 | Asaoka et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6631398 | Klein | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6701347 | Ogilvie | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6711608 | Ogilvie | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6757813 | Igura | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6839741 | Tsai | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 7603425 | DiPlacido et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7647381 | Logue et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7680890 | Lin | Mar 2010 | B1 |
| 8090788 | Nachum | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8209387 | Fleming, III | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8234371 | Logue et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8364711 | Wilkins et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8682990 | Vitaldevara et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 20020016824 | Leeds | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20030023736 | Abkemeier | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105821 | Shah et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20050021637 | Cox | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050053207 | Claudatos et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055409 | Alsarraf et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055415 | Alsarraf et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060643 | Glass et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198124 | McCarthy | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060036701 | Bulfer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047518 | Claudatos et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20100312621 | Abdulhayoglu | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110264585 | Abdulhayoglu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20130086181 | Vitaldevara et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0813162 | Dec 1997 | EP |
| 11068828 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 3003640 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 9642041 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| 9841913 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| 9857285 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| 9932985 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 9937066 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 9959375 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| 9967731 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| 0068862 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| 0213025 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Cranor et al., “Spam!,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 74-83 (Aug. 1998). |
| Dezen et al., “Value-Added Internet: A Pragmatic TINA-based Path to the Internet and PSTN Integration,” IEEE, pp. 13-21 (Nov. 17-20, 1997). |
| Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Feb. 2, 2012. |
| Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jun. 30, 2005. |
| Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jan. 3, 2008. |
| Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued May 19, 2006. |
| Hotmail Screen Shot (Sep. 1999). |
| Hotmail Screen Shot 1 (1996-1998). |
| Hotmail Screen Shot 2 (May 1999). |
| Hotmail Screen Shot 3 (1999). |
| Hotmail Screen Shot 4 (Pre-Dec. 1999). |
| International Examination Report, PCT Application PCT/AU00/00454, dated Apr. 26, 2001. |
| International Search Report, PCT Application PCT/AU00/00454, dated Jun. 27, 2000. |
| Katirai, “Filtering Junk E-Mail: A Performance Comparison between Genetic Programming & Naive Bayes,” University of Waterloo (Sep. 10, 1999). |
| Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Sep. 17, 2003. |
| Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jan. 4, 2005. |
| Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Sep. 28, 2006. |
| Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Mar. 13, 2007. |
| Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jul. 3, 2007. |
| Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jul. 23, 2012. |
| Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 13/745,561, issued Jun. 9, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Sep. 18, 2012. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/745,561, issued Dec. 10, 2013. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/745,561, issued Apr. 8, 2014. |
| Press Release 1 (Dec. 1, 1999). |
| Press Release 2 (Mar. 9, 2000). |
| Yoon, “Vicarious Certification and Billing Agent for Web Information Service,” IEEE, pp. 344-349 (Jan. 21-23, 1998). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140325003 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13745561 | Jan 2013 | US |
| Child | 14325861 | US | |
| Parent | 10009575 | US | |
| Child | 13745561 | US |