Message processing system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9407588
  • Patent Number
    9,407,588
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 28, 2015
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 2, 2016
    9 years ago
Abstract
A message processing system is disclosed herein. A client computing device may receive an electronic message from a server via a network and via a forwarding operation on a condition that the electronic message is approved to be forwarded to a recipient. The client computing device may then receive from the server a message that the electronic message is unapproved, wherein the message includes a URL to view the unapproved electronic message and the electronic message is stored on the server with an indication that the electronic message is unapproved. The client computing device may then receive a list of unapproved electronic messages to display, wherein associated with the list are selectable options including to send the unapproved electronic message, to add a sender of the unapproved electronic message to an approved sender list, and to delete the unapproved electronic message.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to a message handling process and a message processing system, which may be used to deal with unsolicited and unapproved electronic messages.


2. Description of the Related Art


Electronic messaging, particularly the use of e-mail over the Internet, has been enthusiastically adopted by large numbers of people, who have taken advantage of the inherent efficiencies and convenience of electronic messaging. One unfortunate consequence of Internet e-mail, however, has been the proliferation of unsolicited and unwanted e-mail messages, often referred to as “spam”, which people receive. Various methods have been developed to restrict or prevent spam from reaching intended recipients. The methods have included both technical and legal measures which to date have met with mixed results. None have eliminated the problem of spam, nor prevented “spammers” from sending their messages and seeking to subvert the measures.


One of the technical measures includes applying a spam filter which processes an incoming message to determine whether it should forwarded to the recipient or not. The disadvantage associated with such filters is that inevitably useful messages for the recipient are inadvertently filtered and never received.


It is desired to provide a method and system which provides a useful alternative or which allows management of unsolicited messages without seeking to simply restrict or filter incoming messages.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a message handling process, including:


determining if a message is approved for the recipient of the message;


processing the message for subsequent viewing by the recipient if the message is approved; and


notifying the recipient and storing the message if the message is unapproved.


The present invention also provides a message processing system, including:


means for determining if a message is approved for the recipient of the message;


means for processing the message for subsequent viewing by the recipient if the message is approved; and


means for notifying the recipient and storing the message if the message is unapproved.


The present invention also provides a message processing system, including:


an electronic message server for receiving and storing electronic messages for a recipient; and


an electronic message manager for processing electronic messages for a recipient to determine if the electronic messages are approved based on stored criteria, sending approved electronic messages for the recipient to a location for access by the recipient, and storing and sending a notification to the recipient of unapproved messages.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A preferred embodiment of the present invention is hereinafter described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a message processing system connected to a communications network; and



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of the message handling process executed by the message processing system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

A message processing system 2, as shown in FIG. 1, is provided by a computer which may be a Unix server. The system 2 includes standard web server 8 and e-mail server 12 so that the system 2 can operate as a web server and can also operate as an e-mail server, i.e. a standard POP3/SMTP/IMAP e-mail server. The system 2 also includes e-mail manager 10 stored on the server which includes program code and database code that establishes a database on the system 2. The code of the email manager 10 causes the system 2 to execute the message handling steps described below. Although shown on one machine, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that components 8, 10 and 12 of the system 2 can be distributed amongst a number of machines in different locations, provided the components 8, 10 and 12 can communicate with one another, as shown in FIG. 1. Also it will be understood that the e-mail manager could be provided at least in part by application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) which execute the steps of the message handling process.


A user of the system 2 is able to access the system 2 via a communications network 4 using a standard computer 6 with a web browser. The communications network 4 may be, for example, the Internet or a LAN. For instance, the system 2 may be part of a corporate intranet, and act as a gateway for the intranet to the Internet. The system 2 may also be controlled by a service provider simply providing an e-mail service via the Internet. The service provider can then service any users which can connect via the Internet, including the users of corporate networks. Users, including companies, which use the system are registered and identified as being users by the e-mail manager 10. All e-mails for the users are then directed to the system 2.


The message handling method executed by the system 2, and in particular the e-mail manager 10, is shown in FIG. 2. For incoming e-mails received by the system 2 for the users, at step 14, the e-mail manager 10 determines, at step 16, whether the e-mail message is approved. Approval of an e-mail message can be based on a number of criteria, with the simplest being whether the sender of the message is on a list of approved senders for the intended recipient that is stored on the database of the e-mail manager 10. If the message is approved at step 16, a forward procedure is executed and a determination is made at step 17 as to whether the recipient collects e-mail messages from the e-mail server 12 directly. If so, the message is stored on the e-mail server 12 at step 20 for retrieval from the e-mail server 12 in the normal manner. Otherwise the e-mail server 12 forwards the message to the recipient's e-mail server at step 22 via the communications network 4.


If it is determined at step 16 that the message is not approved, then the system 2 notifies the recipient, at step 18, that it has disallowed a received message for the recipient. The recipient can be notified by a number of communications methods, such as by e-mail or by a telephone call over the network 4. On receipt of the notification at step 18, the recipient can direct their web browser to the web server 8 and view a list of disallowed messages. From the list, the user can execute a number of actions, such as read the message, select a sender of a message to be added to the approved list stored by the e-mail manager 10 or simply delete messages.


At step 18, the sender of an e-mail that has been disallowed by the system 2 is notified by e-mail that their message has been held in a pending mailbox because they were not on the recipient's list of authorised e-mail senders. The sender is also informed by e-mail that if they wish to ensure that the recipient reads the e-mail, the sender should use other means, such as telephone, to inform the recipient that they have been sent an e-mail and ask that the recipient add the sender's e-mail address to the recipient's list of authorised senders.


The e-mail manager 10 uses the e-mail server 12 to send the notifications at step 18 by e-mail, and the e-mail for the recipient includes a URL for the web server 8. A recipient can then respond to the notification by selecting the URL and pointing the browser to the web server 8. The e-mail manager 10 determines at step 24, after a predetermined period of time, whether or not the recipient has ignored the notification sent by e-mail. If the notification is ignored, the system 2 sends a return e-mail, at step 26, notifying the sender that the sent message has not been the read by the recipient. The message is then deleted at step 30.


If the recipient responds to the e-mail notification so as to direct the recipient's browser to the system 2, the browser communicates with the web server 8 which sends a web page, designated by the URL. The web page displays a list of messages not approved by the e-mail manager 10 with the recently sent message being highlighted or selected. The e-mail manager 10 then enters a loop which allows a number of functions to be executed. At step 28 the e-mail manager 10 determines whether the recipient has selected on the web page an option to add the sender of the highlighted message to the approved list maintained by the e-mail manager 10. If not, operation of the e-mail manager 10 proceeds to step 32, otherwise the e-mail manager 10 will update the recipient's approved list to add the sender, at step 34, and then proceed to step 32. At step 32, the e-mail manager 10 determines whether the recipient has chosen an option on the web page to read the highlighted message, and if not, operation proceeds to step 31. Otherwise, the message is displayed at step 36 for the recipient's browser, and operation proceeds to step 31. At step 31, the manager determines whether the recipient has selected an option on the web page to save the highlighted or read message, and if so, operation proceeds to step 33 to save the message. At step 33, the forward procedure is called to execute step 17 for the message and proceed to either step 20 or 22 to save the message and then return to the loop. At step 35, the e-mail manager 10 determines whether the recipient has selected an option to delete the highlighted or read message. If so, the message is deleted at step 37, and operation returns to the loop. At step 39, a determination is made, based on activity of the recipient, as to whether the recipient has directed its browser away from or closed the web page, and if so, the loop is exited and operation ends at step 40.


The e-mail manager 10 also executes scheduled tasks 42 to delete unapproved messages on which no action has been taken by recipients for a predetermined period of time, and notify senders as in step 26. Alternatively, the scheduled tasks may be set for a recipient so that unapproved messages on which no action has been taken for a predetermined period of time are stored or saved automatically by calling the forward procedure to execute step 17 and proceed to either step 20 or 22.


The above system 2 and management method are particularly advantageous as they provide users with the capability to manage unsolicited or unapproved e-mail messages without having the messages inadvertently removed by a message filter. The management facilities provided by the system 2 are web browser based, and provides significant additional management services to users of browser based e-mail services, such as those provided by Hotmail and Yahoo.


Many modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention as herein described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving, by a client computing device from a server via a network, a first signal including an electronic message on a condition that the electronic message is approved to be forwarded to a recipient;receiving, by the client computing device from the server, a second signal including a message that the electronic message is unapproved, wherein the message includes a URL to view the unapproved electronic message and the electronic message is stored on the server with an indication that the electronic message is unapproved; andreceiving, by the client computing device, a list of unapproved electronic messages to display, wherein associated with the list are selectable options including to send the unapproved electronic message, to add a sender of the unapproved electronic message to an approved sender list, and to delete the unapproved electronic message.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: receiving, by the client computing device from the server, a notification message with a link to network data having the list of unapproved electronic messages.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the notification message is an email message.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising: receiving, by the client computing device from the server, criteria to determine whether the electronic message is approved.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the criteria comprises the approved sender list.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the unapproved electronic message is unread.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the list of unapproved electronic messages does not include a self-removing message indicator.
  • 8. A user device comprising: a computing device configured to receive, from a server via a network, a first signal including an electronic message on a condition that the electronic message is approved to be forwarded to a recipient;the computing device is further configured to receive, from the server, a second signal including a message that the electronic message is unapproved, wherein the message includes a URL to view the unapproved electronic message and the electronic message is stored on the server with an indication that the electronic message is unapproved; andthe computing device is further configured to receive a list of unapproved electronic messages to display, wherein associated with the list are selectable options including to send the unapproved electronic message, to add a sender of the unapproved electronic message to an approved sender list, and to delete the unapproved electronic message.
  • 9. The user device of claim 8 further comprising: the computing device is further configured to receive a notification message with a link to network data having the list of unapproved electronic messages.
  • 10. The user device of claim 9, wherein the notification message is an email message.
  • 11. The user device of claim 8 further comprising: the computing device is further configured to receive criteria to determine whether the electronic message is approved.
  • 12. The user device of claim 11, wherein the criteria comprises the approved sender list.
  • 13. The user device of claim 8, wherein the unapproved electronic message is unread.
  • 14. The user device of claim 8, wherein the list of unapproved electronic messages does not include a self-removing message indicator.
  • 15. A computer-readable storage medium with stored instructions executable by a computer, the instructions comprising: instructions to receive, from a server via a network, a first signal including an electronic message on a condition that the electronic message is approved to be forwarded to a recipient;instructions to receive, from the server, a second signal including a message that the electronic message is unapproved, wherein the message includes a URL to view the unapproved electronic message and the electronic message is stored on the server with an indication that the electronic message is unapproved; andinstructions to receive a list of unapproved electronic messages to display, wherein associated with the list are selectable options including to send the unapproved electronic message, to add a sender of the unapproved electronic message to an approved sender list, and to delete the unapproved electronic message.
  • 16. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 further comprising: instructions to receive a notification message with a link to network data having the list of unapproved electronic messages.
  • 17. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 further comprising: instructions to receive criteria to determine whether the electronic message is approved.
  • 18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein the criteria comprises the approved sender list.
  • 19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the unapproved electronic message is unread.
  • 20. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the list of unapproved electronic messages does not include a self-removing message indicator.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
PQ 0302 May 1999 AU national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/325,861, filed Jul. 8, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/745,561, filed Jan. 18, 2013, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/009,575, filed Aug. 6, 2002, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,359,289 on Jan. 22, 2013, which is the U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/AU00/00454, filed May 12, 2000, which claims the benefit of Australian Provisional Patent Application No. PQ 0302, filed May 12, 1999, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (88)
Number Name Date Kind
4928145 Okamoto May 1990 A
4932826 Moy et al. Jun 1990 A
5560008 Johnson et al. Sep 1996 A
5619648 Canale et al. Apr 1997 A
5696898 Baker et al. Dec 1997 A
5717923 Dedrick Feb 1998 A
5758083 Singh et al. May 1998 A
5790790 Smith Aug 1998 A
5805810 Maxwell Sep 1998 A
5813007 Nielsen Sep 1998 A
5819092 Ferguson et al. Oct 1998 A
5826022 Nielsen Oct 1998 A
5889958 Willens Mar 1999 A
5905777 Foladare et al. May 1999 A
5923848 Goodhand et al. Jul 1999 A
5948061 Merriman et al. Sep 1999 A
5958005 Thorne Sep 1999 A
6052709 Paul Apr 2000 A
6076101 Kamakura et al. Jun 2000 A
6108688 Nielsen Aug 2000 A
6112227 Heiner Aug 2000 A
6182118 Finney et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192396 Kohler Feb 2001 B1
6192407 Smith Feb 2001 B1
6199102 Cobb Mar 2001 B1
6212553 Lee et al. Apr 2001 B1
6230188 Marcus May 2001 B1
6237037 Larsson May 2001 B1
6249805 Fleming, III Jun 2001 B1
6266692 Greenstein Jul 2001 B1
6275848 Arnold Aug 2001 B1
6275850 Beyda et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289212 Stein et al. Sep 2001 B1
6314454 Wang et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317648 Sleep et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321267 Donaldson Nov 2001 B1
6324569 Ogilvie et al. Nov 2001 B1
6332164 Jain Dec 2001 B1
6335963 Bosco Jan 2002 B1
6345281 Kardos et al. Feb 2002 B1
6363427 Teibel et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366950 Scheussler et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377978 Nguyen Apr 2002 B1
6385655 Smith May 2002 B1
6393464 Dieterman May 2002 B1
6421709 McCormick et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424995 Shuman Jul 2002 B1
6430562 Kardos et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442600 Anderson Aug 2002 B1
6460050 Pace et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463462 Smith Oct 2002 B1
6480855 Siefert Nov 2002 B1
6480885 Olivier Nov 2002 B1
6487586 Ogilvie et al. Nov 2002 B2
6496855 Hunt et al. Dec 2002 B1
6522945 Sleep et al. Feb 2003 B2
6606647 Shah et al. Aug 2003 B2
6609138 Merriam Aug 2003 B1
6615242 Riemers Sep 2003 B1
6625257 Asaoka et al. Sep 2003 B1
6631398 Klein Oct 2003 B1
6636965 Beyda Oct 2003 B1
6701347 Ogilvie Mar 2004 B1
6711608 Ogilvie Mar 2004 B1
6757713 Ogilvie et al. Jun 2004 B1
6839741 Tsai Jan 2005 B1
7603425 DiPlacido et al. Oct 2009 B2
7647381 Logue et al. Jan 2010 B2
7680890 Lin Mar 2010 B1
8090788 Nachum Jan 2012 B2
8209387 Fleming, III Jun 2012 B2
8234371 Logue et al. Jul 2012 B2
8364711 Wilkins et al. Jan 2013 B2
8682990 Vitaldevara et al. Mar 2014 B2
20020016824 Leeds Feb 2002 A1
20030023736 Abkemeier Jan 2003 A1
20030105821 Shah et al. Jun 2003 A1
20050021637 Cox Jan 2005 A1
20050053207 Claudatos et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055409 Alsarraf et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055415 Alsarraf et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060643 Glass et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050198124 McCarthy Sep 2005 A1
20060036701 Bulfer et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047518 Claudatos et al. Mar 2006 A1
20100312621 Abdulhayoglu Dec 2010 A1
20110264585 Abdulhayoglu Oct 2011 A1
20130086181 Vitaldevara et al. Apr 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0813162 Dec 1997 EP
11068828 Mar 1999 JP
3003640 Jan 2000 JP
9642041 Dec 1996 WO
9841913 Sep 1998 WO
9857285 Dec 1998 WO
9932985 Jul 1999 WO
9937066 Jul 1999 WO
9959375 Nov 1999 WO
9967731 Dec 1999 WO
0068862 Nov 2000 WO
0213025 Feb 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (30)
Entry
Cranor et al., “Spam!,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 74-83 (Aug. 1998).
Dezen et al., “Value-Added Internet: A Pragmatic TINA-based Path to the Internet and PSTN Integration,” IEEE, pp. 13-21 (Nov. 17-20, 1997).
Final Rejection, U.S Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Feb. 2, 2012.
Final Rejection, U.S Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jun. 30, 2005.
Final Rejection, U.S Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jan. 3, 2008.
Final Rejection, U.S Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued May 19, 2006.
Hotmail Screen Shot (Sep. 1999).
Hotmail Screen Shot 1 (1996-1998).
Hotmail Screen Shot 2 (May 1999).
Hotmail Screen Shot 3 (1999).
Hotmail Screen Shot 4 (Pre-Dec. 1999).
International Examination Report, PCT Application PCT/AU00/00454, dated Apr. 26, 2001.
International Search Report, PCT Application PCT/AU00/00454, dated Jun. 27, 2000.
Katirai, “Filtering Junk E-Mail: A Performance Comparison between Genetic Programming & Naive Bayes,” University of Waterloo (Sep. 10, 1999).
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Sep. 17, 2003.
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jan. 4, 2005.
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Sep. 28, 2006.
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Mar. 13, 2007.
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jul. 3, 2007.
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Jul. 23, 2012.
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 13/745,561, issued Jun. 9, 2013.
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 10/009,575, issued Sep. 18, 2012.
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/745,561, issued Dec. 10, 2013.
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/745,561, issued Apr. 8, 2014.
Press Release 1 (Dec. 1, 1999).
Press Release 2 (Mar. 9, 2000).
Yoon, “Vicarious Certification and Billing Agent for Web Information Service,” IEEE, pp. 344-349 (Jan. 21-23, 1998).
Non-Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 14/325,861 issued Aug. 4, 2014.
Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 14/325,861 issued Nov. 17, 2014.
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 14/325,861 issued Apr. 28, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150372956 A1 Dec 2015 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 14325861 Jul 2014 US
Child 14839283 US
Parent 13745561 Jan 2013 US
Child 14325861 US
Parent 10009575 US
Child 13745561 US