This invention relates to screening electronic messages.
In some instances, parents and employers may want to supervise their children's and employees' Internet access to prevent improper use, such as receipt of inappropriate content or communications. This supervision may involve “eyes-on” supervision by parents or employers to prevent communication by or with undesirable elements. For instance, a parent or an employer may choose to physically prevent Internet access by the child or the employee until after the parent or the employer has reviewed received messages or to maintain “eyes-on” supervision while the child or the employee is online.
In one general aspect, electronic messages may be routed by routing an electronic message directed to an intended recipient to a supervisory recipient and enabling the electronic message to be screened by the supervisory recipient. Implementations may include one or more of the following features. For example, routing the electronic message may include notifying the intended recipient that the electronic message has been routed to the supervisory recipient. Routed electronic messages may include email, instant or chat room messages.
In some implementations, screening the electronic message may include allowing the supervisory recipient to approve or reject the electronic message, and forwarding the approved electronic message to the intended recipient. Screening the electronic message also may include comparing an electronic address of a sender of the electronic message to a sender list, and approving or rejecting the electronic message based on a result of the comparison. The sender list may include a list of approved senders to compare the electronic address of the sender to the list of approved senders. Alternatively, or additionally, the sender list may include a list of blocked senders to compare the electronic address of the sender to the list of blocked senders.
In some implementations, a supervisory recipient may be designated for an intended recipient. For example, the intended recipient may be a minor child and the supervisory recipient may be a guardian for the minor child. The intended recipient and the supervisory recipient may have related accounts within an electronic mail service. Additionally, the intended recipient and the supervisory recipient may have unique screen names comprising a single Internet service provider account. Alternatively, the intended recipient and the supervisory recipient may have unrelated accounts.
Implementations may include a method or process, an apparatus or system, or computer software on a computer medium. The details of one or more of the implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Referring to
Sender 110 may be a computer programmed or configured to send an electronic message, such as hardware setup 100b described with reference to
Alternatively, sender 110 may be implemented by another type of machine or device capable of sending an electronic message. Examples of electronic messages include e-mail, chat room, private chat room, instant messaging, bulletin board postings, and other systems for transmitting text or graphics images to recipients. In other implementations, sender 110 may send a non-electronic message such as a letter, an audio or video message, or a light modulated message.
Sender 110 may be connected to delivery network 130 by communication link 120. Communication link 120 may include one or more communication pathways that enable communications through one or more delivery networks, such as wired, wireless, cable, or satellite communication pathways. Examples of delivery networks 130 may include the Internet, the World Wide Web, WANs, LANs, analog or digital wired and wireless telephone networks (e.g., PSTN, ISDN, and xDSL), radio, television, cable, satellite, and/or any other delivery mechanism for carrying data. The Internet is a global network connecting millions of computers using a decentralized design.
Delivery network 130 may be connected by communication link 120 to message screening (MS) server 140, which is capable of handling message screening functions. AMS server 140 may include a computer. Alternatively, MS server 140 may include a multi-purpose device, or other devices capable of managing message screening functions. Message screening functions may include redirecting messages from an intended recipient to a supervisory recipient, concurrent with or instead of directing those messages to the intended recipient. The messages to be directed by delivery network 130 to the supervisory recipient may be filtered or otherwise identified based on predetermined criteria or in other ways.
MS server 140 may be connected by communication link 120 to intended and supervisory recipients 150, 160. Intended and supervisory recipients 150, 160 generally are capable of communicating electronic messages and information with the MS server 140 and each other. For example, intended and supervisory recipients 150, 160 may include personal computer systems or other electronic devices such as a pager, a personal digital assistant, or a wireless telephone for communicating electronic messages. Moreover, intended and supervisory recipients 150, 160 may include software stored on a computer system with different screen names and passwords enabling access to different accounts. In one implementation, intended recipient 150 includes software enabling access by a minor child, and supervisory recipient 160 includes software enabling access by the child's parent or guardian. In another implementation, intended recipient 150 includes software enabling access by an employee and supervisory recipient 160 includes software enabling access and/or supervision by an employer.
Referring to
Establishing a supervisory recipient (step 205) may include, for example, storing the related electronic address of the supervisory recipient 160 for the intended recipient 150 in the memory or storage of MS server 140.
Receiving an electronic message (step 210) generally is performed by examining the header of the electronic message for an electronic address corresponding to intended recipient 150, determining whether the electronic address of intended recipient 150 corresponds to an intended recipient that is subject to supervisory screening, and routing the electronic message to supervisory recipient 160 if the address corresponds to an intended recipient subject to supervisory screening.
More specifically, using the electronic address of intended recipient 150 specified in the electronic message or otherwise obtained, MS server 140 determines the electronic address of supervisory recipient 160 by, for example, referring to a database or lookup table. MS server 140 then may route the electronic message automatically to an appropriate supervisory recipient 160 corresponding to intended recipient 150.
The electronic message may be routed to supervisory recipient 160 in addition to intended recipient 150, or it may be routed to supervisory recipient 160 in lieu of intended recipient 150. In one implementation, the message screening system may be configured to enable review by supervisory recipient 160 without preventing or delaying receipt by intended recipient 150. This can be performed by, for example, sending the electronic message concurrently to both intended recipient 150 and supervisory recipient 160. Alternatively, the supervisory recipient 160 may be given a certain time period to screen and approve an electronic message, after which a default condition may be established to automatically forward the electronic message to the intended recipient 150 or to permanently delete the electronic message. In any case, receipt of the message by supervisory recipient 160 may be performed with or without notice to intended recipient 150. Furthermore, an electronic message may be directed to one or more supervisory recipients 160.
Enabling screening of the electronic message by the supervisory recipient (step 220) may include reviewing the electronic message. Supervisory recipient 160 may be provided with a viewing screen having one or more control panels that allow supervisory recipient to approve or reject the electronic message for receipt by intended recipient 150.
The message screening system may be configured to automatically screen an electronic message. For example, lists of approved or blocked senders 110 may be stored at supervisory recipient 160, or otherwise, to enable automatic screening of predesignated message types or sender identifications. In one implementation, during the screening process, the sender 110 may be added to the lists of approved or blocked senders by the supervisory recipient 160. In another implementation, the MS server 140 may compare the electronic address of sender 110 to the list of approved or blocked senders 110 and, based on the comparison, either forward the message, reject the message, or allow supervisory recipient 160 to screen this message of senders 110 personally, or otherwise. Approval may include a manual procedure performed by supervisory recipient 160 such as entering a command or pressing a key. Approval also may be a default condition that is presumed to exist after a certain time period of inaction by supervisory recipient 160 after receiving the electronic message. In general, MS server 140 generally forwards the electronic message to intended recipient 150.
Forwarding an approved electronic message to the intended recipient (step 230) generally includes automatically routing the electronic message to the intended recipient if the message is deemed acceptable for forwarding (in step 220). For example, sender 110 may be included on a list of approved senders. Conversely, if the message is not deemed acceptable for forwarding, the message may be refused (step 240). For example, the message may be refused by deletion of the message. In another implementation, the sender may receive or access a message indicating that the electronic message sent to intended recipient 150 was refused.
Refusal may occur after sender 110 is added to a list of senders whose messages are automatically refused. In yet another implementation, if a threshold number of electronic messages from a sender 110 are refused, the sender may be added to a list of senders to be refused or blocked and all further electronic messages from that sender 110 may be automatically refused or blocked, as appropriate.
Referring again to
In the examples described above, supervisory recipient 160 and intended recipient 150 may have related accounts, they may have unique screen names as part of a shared Internet service provider (ISP) account, or they may have unrelated accounts.
A number of implementations of the message screening system have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the message screening system. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/702,401, filed May 1, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/612,838, filed on Sep. 13, 2012, which is now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,083,666, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/345,398, filed on Jan. 6, 2012, which is now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,776,222, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/555,431, filed on Nov. 1, 2006, which is now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,099,780, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/801,932, filed Mar. 9, 2001, which is now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,174,453, which claims priority from U.S. provisional application No. 60/258,902, filed Dec. 29, 2000. The prior applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5101424 | Clayton | Mar 1992 | A |
5315504 | Lemble | May 1994 | A |
5339391 | Wroblewski et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5479600 | Wroblewski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5532715 | Bates et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5619648 | Canale et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5694523 | Wical | Dec 1997 | A |
5694616 | Johnson | Dec 1997 | A |
5796948 | Cohen | Aug 1998 | A |
5826261 | Spencer | Oct 1998 | A |
5835722 | Bradshaw et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5877759 | Bauer | Mar 1999 | A |
5878219 | Vance, Jr. et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5895465 | Guha | Apr 1999 | A |
5913214 | Madnick et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924090 | Krellenstein | Jul 1999 | A |
5933827 | Cole et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940821 | Wical | Aug 1999 | A |
5982369 | Sciammarella et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983214 | Lang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987446 | Corey | Nov 1999 | A |
5987611 | Freund | Nov 1999 | A |
5991756 | Wu | Nov 1999 | A |
5999932 | Paul | Dec 1999 | A |
6023723 | McCormick et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026429 | Jones et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038610 | Belfiore et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055540 | Snow et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055572 | Saksena | Apr 2000 | A |
6065056 | Bradshaw et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073142 | Geiger et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076100 | Cottrille et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078866 | Buck et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081805 | Guha | Jun 2000 | A |
6094657 | Hailpern et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098066 | Snow | Aug 2000 | A |
6108651 | Guha | Aug 2000 | A |
6112201 | Wical | Aug 2000 | A |
6112227 | Heiner | Aug 2000 | A |
6125353 | Yagasaki | Sep 2000 | A |
6128739 | Fleming, III | Oct 2000 | A |
6145004 | Walsh | Nov 2000 | A |
6167450 | Angwin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175830 | Maynard | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182081 | Dietl et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199102 | Cobb | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6266664 | Russell-Falla et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275820 | Navin-Chandra et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278993 | Kumar | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6321224 | Beall et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327590 | Chidlovskii | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339437 | Nielsen | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339784 | Morris et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356899 | Chakrabarti et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370527 | Singhal | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385602 | Tso et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393464 | Dieterman | May 2002 | B1 |
6442549 | Schneider | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456998 | Bui | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460034 | Wical | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463430 | Brady et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480885 | Olivier | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505194 | Nikolovska et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519639 | Glasser et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6546416 | Kirsch | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560600 | Broder | May 2003 | B1 |
6564787 | Barry | May 2003 | B1 |
6571256 | Dorian et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574632 | Fox | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6601061 | Holt | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606620 | Sundaresan et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606657 | Zilberstein et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615248 | Smith | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628766 | Hollis et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631244 | Suginaga | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6691162 | Wick | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701310 | Sugiura et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704728 | Chang et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704729 | Klein | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718365 | Dutta | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721741 | Eyal et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732157 | Gordon et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745227 | Bates et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6745367 | Bates et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6769009 | Reisman | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785671 | Bailey | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785824 | Grassle | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795856 | Bunch | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6854074 | McLellan et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859807 | Knight | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868498 | Katsikas | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6892074 | Tarkiainen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6938021 | Shear | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6950989 | Rosenzweig et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957229 | Dyor | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6983379 | Spalink et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7046139 | Kuhn et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051116 | Rodriguez-Val et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7174453 | Lu | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194536 | Fellenstein et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7246128 | Jordahl | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7302488 | Matthew et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7424676 | Carlson | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7640336 | Lu | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7904554 | Lu | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8099780 | Lu | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8776222 | Lu | Jul 2014 | B2 |
RE45558 | Lu | Jun 2015 | E |
9083666 | Lu | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20010003828 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010012286 | Huna et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020032782 | Rangan | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049806 | Gatz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049907 | Woods et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052919 | Morris et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020083179 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091936 | Tema | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095415 | Walker et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107950 | Lu | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120866 | Mitchell et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129015 | Caudill et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165777 | Lotvin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181703 | Logan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184496 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023736 | Abkemeier | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030061111 | Dutta et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030105822 | Gusler et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110168 | Kester et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030177111 | Egendorf | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030204741 | Schoen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003071 | Matthew et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003279 | Beilinson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006621 | Bellinson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010720 | Singh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019650 | Auvenshine | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040093384 | Shipp | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111479 | Borden et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148347 | Appelman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040154022 | Boss et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177015 | Galai | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181690 | Rothermel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203363 | Carlton et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249938 | Bunch | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004949 | Trepess et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050044181 | Lee | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050222 | Packer | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055416 | Heikes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055450 | Gang | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076060 | Finn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091385 | Nordstrom | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102407 | Clapper | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108227 | Russell-Falla et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144297 | Dahlstrom et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149622 | Kirkland et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160144 | Bhatia | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050210387 | Alagappan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228881 | Reasor et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050282530 | Raff | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060075358 | Ahokas | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085419 | Rosen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060127870 | Fields et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060155764 | Tao | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161668 | Mathew et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161669 | Mathew et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168186 | Mathew et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173792 | Glass | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173793 | Glass | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060263757 | Bender | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070061869 | DeHaas | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070124272 | DeCastra et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143281 | Smirin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162507 | McGovern et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080275820 | Joao et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20110238478 | Gottfurcht et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130173721 | Lu | Jul 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0375138 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0827063 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0918295 | May 1999 | EP |
0945811 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1045547 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1079318 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1209866 | May 2002 | EP |
2000- 357176 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2000-357176 | Dec 2000 | JP |
WO 9939286 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0026762 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0058894 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0068815 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0116806 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0127720 | Apr 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Duan, “Detecting Spam Zombies by Monitoring Outgoing Messages”, Mar./Apr. 2012, IEEE, p. 198-210. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,401, Nov. 30, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/702,401, filed May 1, 2015, Lu. |
The Wall Street Journal Article, “Esniff Ferrets Out Misbehavior by ‘Reading’ E-Mail, Web Visits,” Katherine Lange, interactive.wsj.com, Apr. 27, 2001:Tech Q&A. |
The Early Report—The Early Show segment, “Big Brother in the Corner Office,” Julie Chen, cbsnews.com/earlyshow/caught/techage/20001228e—sniff.shtml, Dec. 28, 2000: Tech Age. |
“The eSniff Product Overview,” eSniff: Define Your e-Boundaries, www.esniff.com/product—overview.html, May 15, 2001. |
SpectorSoft Corporation, Industry Leading Spy Software Company Announces Instant Messaging Feature in Spector Professional Edition, Apr. 24, 2002. |
SpectorSoft Corporation, SpectorSoft Corporation Ships Major Upgrade of eBlaster, Aug. 21, 2002. |
Press release, SpectorSoft Corporation, SpectorSoft Announces New Version of Award Winning Spector Software, May 18, 2000. |
Nigel Miller, Can an employer monitor its employees' E-mail?, Computer Audit Update, May 1997, pp. 30-31. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration in PCT US01/48749, on Apr. 11, 2002. |
“Guardian Setup Instructions” [online], America Online [retrieved Nov. 23, 2004]; retrieved from the Internet: http://challenevents.aol.com/guardian/images/print-instructions:gif. |
“Guardian an e-mail report that shows parents what their children are doing online” [online], America Online [retrieved on Nov. 23, 2004]; retrieved from the Internet: http://challenevents.aol.com/guardian/. |
“Parental Controls” [online], America Online [retrieved on Nov. 23, 2004]; retrieved from the Internet: http://www.aol.com/info/parentalcontrol.html/. |
Ignite Software: Parent Tools Feature Set, “Parent Tools Features,” http://www.parent-tools.com/features.htm, Ignite Software, pp. 1-3, as accessed on Dec. 10, 2003. |
Parent Tools—The Ultimate in Monitoring an Controlling AIMe, “Parent Tools in AIM,” http://www.parent-tools.com/screenshots.htm, pp. 1-4, as accessed on Dec. 10, 2003. |
McMurray, Sandy, “Shield your children from unsuitable Internet content,” http://www.microsoft.com/canada/home.internet&security/2.4.8—protectwithparentalcontrolshowtosafeguardyourcomputer.asp#, Microsoft Home Magazine, pp. 1-3, as accessed on Dec. 10, 2003. |
“Instant Messaging is Everyone's Business,” Yahoo Business Messenger, Yahoo! 2003. |
“SurfControl Instant Message Filter,” Instant Message Filter, SurfControl plc. 2003. |
“Spammers Target Instant Message Users,” http://www.bizreport.com/article.php?art—id=5507. Nov. 13, 2003, pp. 1-4. |
Olsen, Stefanie, “Will instant messaging become instant spamming?,” http://news.com.com/2100-1023-252765.html?legacy=cnet, Feb. 16, 2001, pp. 1-4. |
“Protect Your Privacy,” MSN Features, http://mesenger.msn.com/Feature/Privacy.aspx, as accessed on Dec. 2, 2003. |
“Jabber” http://www.jabber.com/index.cgi?CONTENT—ID=9, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
“Knock Settings—Servers Tab,” http://www.knockmail.com/support/adserverset.html, pp. 1-2, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
“Preview Pending Emails in KnockMail,” http://www.knockmail.com/support/previewemail.html, pp. 1-2, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
“Managing your Addresses in KnockMail,” http://www.knockmail.com/support/manaddresses.html, pp. 1-2, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
“Approved Database,” http://www.knockmail.com/support/appdatabase.html, pp. 1, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
“Pending Database for KnockKnock,” http://www.knockmail.com/support/penddatabase.html, pp. 1, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
“Denied Database for KnockKnock,” http://www.knockmail.com/support/denydatbase.html, pp. 1, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
“Email Server Control for KnockKnock,” http://www.knockmail.com/support/emailservcont.html, pp. 1-2, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
“Listsery Control for KnockKnock,” http://www.knockmail.com/support/listservcont.html, pp. 1, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
http://www.knockmail.com/support/newsettings.jpg, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
“Using KnockKnock,” reprinted from http://www.knockmail.com/support/usingknock.html on Dec. 4, 2003. |
Jim Hu, “AOL developing search engine,” CNET.com—News—Entertainment & Media—AOL developing search engine, pp. 1-3 [online], (Jun. 21, 1999) [retrieved on Jul. 26, 2000]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL : http://news.cnet.com/news/0/1005-200-343860.html>. |
Ian Leicht, “Re: My spamblock; Was: Thwarting UCE address culling programs” [online]. Jan. 26, 1997. Retrieved from Internet newsgroup: <news.admin.net-abuse.email> [retrieved on Jul. 15, 2003], pp. 1-2. |
“Development and Operation of the Next-Generation Rating/Filtering System on the Internet,” (XP002219058). Retrieved from the Internet:<URL:http://www.nmda.or.jp/enc/rating2nd-en.html> on Oct. 30, 2002. |
T. Negrino, “The MacWorld Web Searcher's Companion,” MacWorld, PC World Communications, San Francisco, CA, US, vol. 17, No. 5, May 2000, pp. 76-82 (XP008019722). |
“Knock Knock Settings,” reprinted from http://www.knockmail.com/support/newsettings.jpg, as accessed on Dec. 4, 2003. |
Sentry Remote: *Sentry Remote*, at: http://web.archive.org/web/20070629024905/www.sentryparentalcontrols.com/Content/Products/Remote.aspx, Jun. 2007. |
Business Wire, Jul. 26, 2006, Bethpage, New York. |
Bjerkie, “E-mail: The Boss is Watching”, Apr. 1, 1993, Internet and Personal Computing, vol. 96, p. 14. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/801,932, Oct. 29, 2003, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/801,932, Apr. 8, 2004, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/801,932, Mar. 7, 2005, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/801,932, Jan. 25, 2006, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/801,932, Jul. 18, 2006, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/801,932, Dec. 28, 2006, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/330,561, Jun. 28, 2006, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/330,561, Dec. 20, 2006, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/330,561, May 4, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/330,561, Nov. 16, 2007, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/330,561, Aug. 20, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/330,561, Mar. 19, 2009, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/330,561, Aug. 24, 2009, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/091,272, Jun. 18, 2008, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/555,431, Jun. 10, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/555,431, Nov. 19, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/555,431, Sep. 20, 2011, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,505, Sep. 13, 2010, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/646,505, Nov. 24, 2010, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,398, Jul. 8, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,398, May 13, 2014, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,838, Nov. 10, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/612,838, Mar. 23, 2015, Notice of Allowance. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,102, Jul. 3, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,506, Nov. 8, 2013, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,506, Apr. 8, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,506, Oct. 1, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/791,506, Feb. 24, 2015, Notice of Allowance. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150358268 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60258902 | Dec 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14702401 | May 2015 | US |
Child | 14828805 | US | |
Parent | 13612838 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 14702401 | US | |
Parent | 13345398 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 13612838 | US | |
Parent | 11555431 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 13345398 | US | |
Parent | 09801932 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 11555431 | US |