MESYLATE SALTS OF TRIAZOLOPYRAZINE DERIVATIVES

BACKGROUND
Technical Field

Embodiments of the present invention relate to salt forms of triazolopyrazine derivatives. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention relate to salt forms of triazolopyrazine derivatives having pharmacokinetic and therapeutic effects.

Related Art

Triazolopyrazine derivatives have been described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,403,831 (which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein) for use in inhibiting the activity of c-Met kinase, and for treatment hyperproliferative disorders. However, these triazolopyrazine derivatives are described in a free base form rather than a salt form.

A need exists for novel salt forms of triazolopyrazine derivatives having advantageous properties while substantially retaining the pharmacokinetic and therapeutic effects of the free base form.

SUMMARY

The disclosure provides novel salt forms of triazolopyrazine derivatives represented by formula (1) with improved solubility, stability, and/or other properties while maintaining substantially similar pharmacokinetic properties of the free base form of the compounds.

embedded image

In one instance, a salt (mesylate salt) of methanesulfonic acid and a triazolopyrazine derivative of formula (1) is provided.

The disclosure also provides compositions of the mesylate salt and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

The disclosure also provides a method for manufacturing the mesylate salt.

The disclosure also provides a method for inhibiting the activity of c-Met kinase in a subject by administering to a subject in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of the mesylate salt.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows the temperature profile applied in the salt screen experiments.

FIG. 2 shows LCMS analysis of ABN-401, starting material using method S19061_03. Retention time=5.2 min.

FIG. 3 shows LCMS analysis of ABN-401, starting material using method S19061_01. Retention time=2.2 min

FIG. 4 shows HT-XRPD patterns (from bottom to top) of starting material (Form A), Mes1, Mes2, and Mes3.

FIG. 5 shows HT-XRPD patterns of Mes1 (Exp. ID SSm4) before (bottom) and after (top) exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days.

FIG. 6 shows TGA (A) and TGMS (B) analysis (heating rate of 10° C./min) of Mes1 (Exp. ID SSm4). A mass loss of 4.3% attributed to acetone and water was observed between 25-140° C. Thermal decomposition of the salt was observed around 230° C. The heat flow signal of the TGA showed a broad endothermic event due to the mass loss and an endotherm at around 160° C.

FIG. 7 shows HT-XRPD patterns of Mes2 (Exp. ID SSm5) before (bottom) and after (top) exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days.

FIG. 8 shows TGA (A) and TGMS (B) analysis (heating rate of 10° C./min) of Mes2 (Exp. ID SSm5). A mass loss of 4.5% attributed to water was observed between 25-150° C. The heat flow signal of the TGA showed a broad endothermic event associated with the mass loss and an endothermic event at around 210° C., that could be related to the melting of an anhydrous form, followed by decomposition.

FIG. 9 shows DSC curve (heating rate 10° C./min) of Mes2 (Exp. ID SSm5). The DSC curve showed a broad endothermic event from 25 to 120° C. Another endothermic event was observed at 218.2° C., possibly related to the melting of an anhydrous phase.

FIG. 10 shows LCMS chromatogram of Mes2 (Exp. ID SSm5). The API chemical purity was 100% (area %).

FIG. 11 shows Overlay of ¹H-NMR spectra (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) of ABN-401 free base (green line) and Mes2 (Exp. ID SSm5, red line). The peaks corresponding to the CI were highlighted by the signal at 2.3 ppm. The presence of residual acetone was highlighted by the peak at 2.1 ppm.

FIG. 12 shows HT-XRPD patterns of Exp. ID SSm6 before (bottom) (Mes3) and after (top) (Mes3 (deliquescent)) exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days. Digital images of SSm6, before (bottom) and after (top) AAC, are also shown.

FIG. 13 shows TGA (A) and TGMS (B) analysis (heating rate of 10° C./min) of Mes3 (Exp. ID SSm6). A mass loss of 5.6% attributed to water was observed prior to the thermal decomposition of the salt (observed around 220° C.). The heat flow signal of the TGA showed a broad endothermic event related to mass loss and an endotherm at 200° C., followed by decomposition.

FIG. 14 shows HT-XRPD patterns (from bottom to top) of starting material (Form A), Camp1 and Camp2.

FIG. 15 shows HT-XRPD patterns of Exp. ID SSm14 before (bottom) (Camp1) and after (top) (Camp1) exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days.

FIG. 16 shows TGA (A) and TGMS (B) analysis (heating rate of 10° C./min) of Camp1 (Exp. ID SSm14). A mass loss of 3.3% attributed to water was observed between 25-120° C. Thermal decomposition of the salt was observed above 240° C. The heat flow signal of the TGA showed an endotherm at 160° C., possibly attributed to the melting of an anhydrous phase of the salt.

FIG. 17 shows DSC curve (heating rate 10° C./min) of Camp1 (Exp. ID SSm14). The DSC curve showed broad endothermic events between 25 to 100° C. that can be related to the water loss. A broad endothermic event at 164.0° C. that can be attributed to the melting of a potential anhydrous salt was observed.

FIG. 18 shows LCMS chromatogram of Camp1 (Exp. ID SSm14). The API chemical purity was 100% (area %)

FIG. 19 shows Overlay of ¹H-NMR spectra (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) of ABN-401 free base (green line) and Camp1 (Exp. ID SSm14, red line). The peaks corresponding to the CI were highlighted by the signal at 9.3, 3.0, 2.7, 2.6 and 2.3 ppm and from 2.0 to 0.8 ppm.

FIG. 20 shows HT-XRPD patterns of Exp. ID SSm60 before (bottom) (Camp2) and after (top) (Camp2) exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days.

FIG. 21 shows TGA (A) and TGMS (B) analysis (heating rate of 10° C./min) of Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm60 (solids recovered after evaporation of the ML)). A mass loss of 1.6% attributed to water was observed between 25-80° C. Thermal decomposition of the salt was observed above 240° C. The heat flow signal of the TGA showed a sharp endotherm at 200° C. possibly attributed to the melting of the anhydrous salt form.

FIG. 22 shows DSC curve (heating rate 10° C./min) of Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm60 (solids recovered after evaporation of the ML)). The DSC curve showed a broad endothermic event from 25 to 70° C. associated to the water loss. An endothermic event at 208.9° C. could possibly be correlated to the melting of an anhydrous phase of the salt.

FIG. 23 shows TGA (A) and TGMS (B) analysis (heating rate of 10° C./min) of Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm60) after additional drying at 80° C. under vacuum for 1 hour. A mass loss of 1.9% attributed to water was observed between 25-70° C.

FIG. 24 shows LCMS chromatogram of Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm60 (solids recovered after evaporation of the ML). The API chemical purity was 100% (area %).

FIG. 25 shows Overlay of ¹H-NMR spectra (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) of ABN-401 free base (green line) and Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm60, red line). The peaks corresponding to the CI were highlighted by the signal at 9.3, 3.0, 2.7, 2.6 and 2.3 ppm and from 2.0 to 0.8 ppm.

FIG. 26 shows HT-XRPD (top) and HR-XRPD (bottom) of Mes2 (Exp. ID. SSm71)

FIG. 27 shows TGA (A) and TGMS (B) analysis (heating rate of 10° C./min) of Mes2 (Exp. ID SSm71). A mass loss of 3.9% attributed to water was observed between 25-110° C. The thermal decomposition of the salt was observed around 240° C. The heat flow signal of the TGA showed one endotherm at 210° C. most likely attributed to the melting of an anhydrous phase of the salt.

FIG. 28 shows DSC curve (heating rate 10° C./min) of Mes2 (Exp. ID: SSm71). The DSC curve showed one broad endothermic event between 25 and 110° C., associated with the water loss. A double endothermic event was observed at 205-217° C. that could be associated with the melting of an anhydrous phase of salt.

FIG. 29 shows HPLC chromatogram of Mes2 (Exp. ID SSm71). The API chemical purity was 99.6% (area %).

FIG. 30 shows Overlay of ¹H-NMR spectra (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) of ABN-401 free base (blue line), Mes2 (Exp. ID SSm5, green line) and Mes2 (SSm71, red line). The peaks corresponding to the CI were highlighted by the signal at 2.3 ppm.

FIG. 31 shows Change in mass (A) and isotherm (B) resulting from the DVS measurement performed on Mes2 (Exp. ID SSm71).

FIG. 32 shows HR-XRPD (bottom) and HT-XRPD (top) of Camp2 (Exp. ID. SSm73).

FIG. 33 shows TGA (A) and TGMS (B) analysis (heating rate of 10° C./min) of Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm73). A mass loss of 1.6% attributed to water was observed between 25-80° C. The thermal decomposition of the salt was observed around 240° C. The heat flow signal of the TGA showed an endotherm at 200° C. most likely attributed to the melting of an anhydrous phase of the salt.

FIG. 34 shows DSC curve (heating rate 10° C./min) of Camp2 (Exp. ID: SSm73). The DSC curve showed one broad endothermic event, from 25 to 80° C., that can be related to the water loss. A second sharp endotherm was observed at 208.6° C. that could be associated to the melting of an anhydrous phase of the salt.

FIG. 35 shows LCMS chromatogram of Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm73). The API chemical purity was 99.7% (area %).

FIG. 36 shows Overlay of ¹H-NMR spectra (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) of ABN-401 free base (blue line), Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm60, green line) and Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm73, red line). The peaks corresponding to the CI were highlighted by the signal at 9.3, 3.0, 2.7, 2.6 and 2.3 ppm and from 2.0 to 0.8 ppm.

FIG. 37 shows Change in mass (A) and isotherm (B) resulting from the DVS measurement performed on Camp2 (Exp. ID SSm73).

FIG. 38 shows HT-XRPD patterns of the camsylate salt (Exp. ID SSm73) before (Camp2, bottom) and after (Camp4, top) DVS analysis.

FIG. 39 shows TGMS analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Form A upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN78) and (B) Form A upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN74). A mass loss of 3.7 and 4.0% attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition (observed around 230° C.), respectively.

FIG. 40 shows TGMS analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Form A upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN79) and (B) Form A upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN75). A mass loss of 4.1 and 4.4% attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition (observed)

FIG. 41 shows TGMS analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Form A upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN80) and (B) Form A upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN77). A mass loss of 3.3 and 3.7% attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition (observed around 230° C.), respectively.

FIG. 42 shows TGMS analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Form A upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN81) and (B) Form A upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN76). A mass loss of 5.3 and 5.2% attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition, respectively.

FIG. 43 shows HPLC chromatogram of Form A upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN81). The API chemical purity was 87.2% (area %).

FIG. 44 shows HPLC chromatogram of Form A upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN76). The API chemical purity was 90.7% (area %).

FIG. 45 shows Overlay of HT-XRPD patterns of (bottom to top) scale-up Mes2 (Exp. ID. SSm71), Mes2 after exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN66), Mes2 after exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN70), Mes2 after exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN67) and Mes2+peaks after exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN71), Mes2+peaks after exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN68) and Mes4+peaks after exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN73), Mes6 after exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN69) and Mes6 after exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN72). The vertical orange lines highlight additional diffraction peaks at 15.1 and 16.5° 2θ detected in the sample exposed at 40° C./75% RH for 3 and 15 months.

FIG. 46 shows TGA analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Mes2 after exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN66) and (B) Mes2 after exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN70). A mass loss of 8.0% and 10.8% attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition of the salt (observed around 230° C.), respectively. The heat flow signals showed broad endotherms corresponding to the water losses and melting events around 215° C.

FIG. 47 shows TGA analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Mes2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN67) and (B) Mes2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN71). A mass loss of 7.7 and 11.2% most likely attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition (observed around 230° C.), respectively. The heat flow signal showed broad endotherms during the water loss and a melting at around 210° C.

FIG. 48 shows TGA analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Mes2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN68) and (B) Mes2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN73). A mass loss of 6.5 and 9.6% most likely attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition (observed around 230° C.), respectively. The heat flow signal showed broad endotherms during the water loss and a melting at around 210° C.

FIG. 49 shows TGA analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Mes2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN69) and (B) Mes2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN72). A mass loss of 8.6 and 12.0% most likely attributed to water was observed, respectively. The heat flow signal showed broad endotherms during the water loss.

FIG. 50 shows HPLC chromatogram of Mes2 after exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN66). The API chemical purity was 99.7% (area %).

FIG. 51 shows HPLC chromatogram of Mes2 after exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN70). The API chemical purity was 97.2% (area %).

FIG. 52 shows HPLC chromatogram of Mes2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN67). The API chemical purity was 99.6% (area %).

FIG. 53 shows HPLC chromatogram of Mes2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN71). The API chemical purity was 99.5% (area %).

FIG. 54 shows HPLC chromatogram of Mes2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN68). The API chemical purity was 100% (area %).

FIG. 55 shows HPLC chromatogram of Mes2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN73). The API chemical purity was 100% (area %).

FIG. 56 shows HPLC chromatogram of Mes2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN69). The API chemical purity was 99.6% (area %).

FIG. 57 shows HPLC chromatogram of Mes2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN72). The API chemical purity was 100% (area %).

FIG. 58 shows Overlay of HT-XRPD patterns (from bottom to top) of scale-up Camp2 (Exp. ID. SSm73), Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN50), Camp2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN54), Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN51) and Camp4 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN55), Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN52) and Camp4 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN56), Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN53) and Camp3+E upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN57).

FIG. 59 shows TGA analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN50) and (B) Camp2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN54). A mass loss of 1.6 and 1.8% attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition of the salt (observed around 240° C.).

FIG. 60 shows TGA analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN51) and (B) Camp2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN55). A mass loss of 1.6 and 7.1% attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition (observed around 240° C.), respectively. The heat flow signals showed broad endotherms corresponding to the released of water followed by endothermic events at 200° C., in case of GEN51 and at 150° C. for GEN55.

FIG. 61 shows TGA analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN52) and (B) Camp2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN56). A mass loss of 1.6 and 6.9% attributed to water was observed before the thermal decomposition (observed around 240° C.), respectively. The heat flow signals showed broad endotherms corresponding to the released of water followed by endothermic events at 200° C., in case of GEN52 and at 150° C. for GEN56.

FIG. 62 shows TGA analyses (heating rate of 10° C./min) of (A) Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN53) and (B) Camp2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 24 months (Exp. ID GEN57). A mass loss of 1.9 and 6.7% attributed to water was observed, respectively. The heat flow signals showed broad endotherms corresponding to the released of water followed by an endothermic event at 150° C. for GEN57.

FIG. 63 shows HPLC chromatogram of Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN50). The API chemical purity was 99.8% (area %).

FIG. 64 shows HPLC chromatogram of Camp2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN54). The API chemical purity was 99.8% (area %).

FIG. 65 shows HPLC chromatogram of Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN51). The API chemical purity was 99.7% (area %).

FIG. 66 shows HPLC chromatogram of Camp2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 3 months (Exp. ID GEN55). The API chemical purity was 99.3% (area %).

FIG. 67 shows HPLC chromatogram of Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN52). The API chemical purity was 97.3% (area %).

FIG. 68 shows HPLC chromatogram of Camp2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN56). The API chemical purity was 93.7% (area %).

FIG. 69 shows HPLC chromatogram of Camp2 upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN53). The API chemical purity was 100% (area %).

FIG. 70 shows HPLC chromatogram of Camp2 upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 15 months (Exp. ID GEN57). The API chemical purity was 88.6% (area %).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

The novel salts inhibit the activity of c-Met tyrosine kinase to be useful as a therapeutic agent of various abnormal proliferative diseases associated with excessive cell proliferation and growth due to the abnormal activity of kinase, such as cancer, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and diabetic retinopathy. The present disclosure describes exemplary pharmaceutical compositions for inhibiting the activity of c-Met tyrosine kinase including novel salts as active ingredients and a pharmaceutical composition for preventing or treating hyper proliferative disorders.

In one aspect, in the mesylate salt the triazolopyrazine derivative of formula (1) is the (S) enantiomer. Preferably the triazolopyrazine derivative of formula (1) is optically pure. In an aspect, the level of optical purity is at least 95%, at least 97%, at least 99%, or essentially 100%.

In an aspect, the mesylate salt has any one salt form of Mes1, Mes2, or Mes3. Preferably the mesylate salt has salt form Mes2. In an aspect, the mesylate salt is physically stable at 20 to 50° C. and 35% to 80% relative humidity (RH) for at least 2 days. In an aspect, the mesylate salt is physically stable up to 24 months at ambient conditions. In an aspect, the mesylate salt has API chemical purity of at least about 95%. Preferably the mesylate salt has API chemical purity of about 100%.

In an aspect, the mesylate salt has a High-Throughput X-Ray Powder Diffraction (HT-XRPD) pattern comprising characteristic peaks at about 15.5 to 16.0 2θ (deg), about 17.5 to 18.0 2θ (deg), and about 21.5 to 22.0 2θ (deg). Preferably, the mesylate salt HT-XRPD pattern has characteristic peaks corresponding substantially to:

2θ [°]
d [Å]
Intensity

1
5.34
16.54
48

2
7.94
11.13
39

3
8.68
10.18
58

4
10.59
8.35
43

5
12.78
6.92
52

6
13.88
6.37
71

7
14.99
5.91
74

8
15.97
5.55
100

9
17.61
5.03
99

10
18.22
4.87
76

11
19.16
4.63
70

12
20.19
4.40
56

13
21.91
4.05
95

14
23.67
3.76
77

15
24.98
3.56
76

16
26.62
3.35
43

17
27.74
3.21
39

18
29.46
3.03
39

or

1
5.19
17.00
19

2
7.81
11.31
29

3
8.62
10.25
39

4
9.42
9.38
3

5
10.42
8.48
9

6
12.51
7.07
23

7
13.80
6.41
52

8
13.98
6.33
38

9
14.33
6.18
42

10
14.75
6.00
74

11
15.25
5.80
27

12
15.86
5.58
100

13
17.27
5.13
80

14
17.89
4.96
46

15
18.15
4.88
45

16
19.01
4.66
37

17
20.00
4.44
46

18
21.54
4.12
82

19
22.14
4.01
53

20
22.79
3.90
43

21
23.32
3.81
48

22
23.88
3.72
61

23
24.49
3.63
80

24
25.10
3.55
55

In an aspect, a method for manufacturing the mesylate salt is provided, including steps of a) adding a compound of formula (1) to a reactor containing a solvent; (b) stirring the compound and the solvent in the reactor; (c) adding methanesulfonic acid to the solution prepared in (b); and (e) cooling the solution prepared in (c) to obtain a precipitate of the mesylate salt. In an aspect, the solvent may be acetonitrile, acetone, 1,2-dimethoxyethane, n-heptane, isopropyl alcohol, water, or THF. In an aspect, the methanesulfonic acid is added to the solution prepared in (b) in an equivalent ratio of about 1:1.5 to about 1:2.5 with respect to formula (1). Preferably, the equivalent ratio is about 1:1.9 to about 1:2.3 and the solvent comprises acetonitrile. In an aspect, step (b) is performed at about 45 to 55° C. for at least about 1 hour.

In another aspect, a pharmaceutical composition is provided, including the mesylate salt and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The pharmaceutically acceptable carrier may be one or more of lactose, dextrose, sucrose, sorbitol, mannitol, starch, acacia rubber, calcium phosphate, alginate, gelatin, calcium silicate, microcrystalline cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, cellulose, water, syrup, methylcellulose, methylhydroxybenzoate, propylhydroxybenzoate, talc, magnesium stearate, and mineral oil. The pharmaceutical composition may include one or more of a lubricant, a wetting agent, a sweetening agent, a flavoring agent, an emulsifying agent, a suspending agent, and a preservative.

In another aspect, a method is provided for inhibiting the activity of c-Met kinase in a subject by administering to a subject in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of the mesylate salt. In an aspect, the subject is suffering from a hyperproliferative disorder. Examples of the hyperproliferative disorder include lung cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, renal cell cancer, prostate cancer, or a brain tumor. In an aspect, the method is for treating or preventing such hyperproliferative disorders.

Abbreviations

General

AAC
Accelerated Ageing Conditions (40° C./75% RH)

Am
Amorphous

API
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient

CI
Counterion

DSC
Differential Scanning Calorimetry

DVS
Dynamic Vapor Sorption

1H-NMR
Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

LCMS
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

HR-XRPD
High Resolution X-Ray Powder Diffraction

HT-XRPD
High Throughput X-Ray Powder Diffraction

LCMS
Liquid Chromatography Mass spectroscopy

ML
Mother liquor (liquid phases)

MS
Mass Spectroscopy

RH
Relative Humidity

RT
Room Temperature

SAS
Experiment ID for the solubility assessment experiments

SSm
Experiment ID for the salt screening experiments

SM
Starting Material

TGA
Thermogravimetric Analysis

TGMS
Thermogravimetric Analysis coupled with Mass Spectros-

copy

Solvents

ACN
Acetonitrile

IPA
2-Propanol

MTBE
tert-Butyl methyl ether

THF
Tetrahydrofuran

Counterions

HCl
Hydrochloride acid

Mes
Methanesulfonic acid

Bes
Benzenesulfonic acid

Mae
Maleic acid

Esy
Ethanesulfonic acid

Camp
D(+)-10-Camphorsulfonic acid

Mao
Malonic acid

Fum
Fumaric acid

Cit
Citric acid

Mal
(−)-L-Malic acid

Suc
Succinic acid

Gal
Gallic acid

While the present disclosure is described in more detail through the following Examples, the scope of the present disclosure is not intended to be limited thereby.

Examples

The compound of formula (1) (“ABN-401”) was provided by Abion. All other chemicals were obtained from Fisher Scientific, Sigma Aldrich or VWR. Chemicals used are at least of research grade. The solvents used for LCMS analysis are of LCMS grade.

Solubility Determinations

The approximate solubility was determined by adding small aliquots of solvent (50 μL up to 1 mL, 100 μL above 1 mL) to the solid starting material until complete dissolution was observed or a maximum volume of 4 mL was reached. Afterwards the solvents were evaporated and obtained solids were analyzed by HT-XRPD. The experimental details and results are reported in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Experimental conditions and results of the solubility determination on ABN-401.

Aliquots of solvent were added to the solid until complete dissolution was observed. XRPD:

in brackets Abion's classification.

Final

volume

Solubility

Exp. ID
Solvent
Mass (mg)
(L)
Dissolved
(mg/mL)
XRPD

SAS1
Acetone
7.72
350
Yes
22.1-25.6
A (I)

SAS2
Acetonitrile
13.42
1700
Yes
7.9 ≤ S ≤ 8.4
B (IV)

SAS3
Chloroform
15.57
50
Yes
>311.4
C

SAS4
1,4-Dioxane
9.97
50
Yes
>199.4
A (I)

SAS5
Ethyl acetate
14.22
3200
Yes
4.4-4.6
A (I)

SAS6
1,2-Dimethoxyethane
16.52
1300
Yes
12.7-13.8
A (I)

SAS7
Isopropanol
10.68
4000
No
<2.7
A (I)

SASS
Methanol
11.37
4000
No
<2.9
D (II)

SAS9
Tetrahydrofuran
9.03
50
Yes
>180.6
A (I)

SAS10
Water
12.49
4000
No
< .1

Thermal Stability

A thermal stability study was performed on ABN-401 to investigate the chemical stability of the starting material in solution when exposed to elevated temperatures. Solutions of ABN-401 were prepared in acetone, 1,2-dimethoxyethane, and acetonitrile with a concentration of approximately 0.3 mg/mL. Solutions were left at RT for 1 hour and successively, two aliquots of each solution were taken and heated at 50° C. and 80° C. for one hour. All these solutions were analyzed by LCMS. Additionally, the samples kept at RT were remeasured by LCMS after 24 hours to check the chemical degradation over time. No significant chemical degradation was observed in the samples kept at 50° C. and 80° C. The results are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2

Results of the LCMS analyses of the thermal stability study.

Rt
Area
Area
Peak height

Solvent
Conditions
(min)
%
counts
(mAu)

Acetone
1
h/RT
5.2
98.8
5905.0
1181.0

Acetone
24
h/RT
5.2
98.5
5843.1
1161.5

Acetone
1
h/50° C.
5.2
99.0
5883.8
1168.2

Acetone
1
h/80° C.
5.2
99.0
5843.1
1169.4

1,2-dimethoxyethane
1
h/RT
5.2
99.0
6751.7
1341.1

1,2-dimethoxyethane
24
h/RT
5.2
98.8
6745.1
1339.0

1,2-dimethoxyetbane
1
h/50° C.
5.2
98.6
6653.6
1326.3

1,2-dimethoxyetbane
1
h/80° C.
5.2
97.7
6697.6
1335.6

ACN
1
h/RT
5.2
99.0
6420.0
1260.0

ACN
24
h/RT
5.2
98.1
6414.1
1255.0

ACN
1
h/50° C.
5.2
99.0
6413.9
1258.7

ACN
1
h/80° C.
5.2
98.7
6445.2
1263.4

SALT Screen Experiments

The screen was started by preparing solutions of ABN-401 in acetone, 1,2-dimethoxyethane, and acetonitrile with a concentration of around 25, 13 and 8 mg/mL, respectively. Counterions were added to the API solutions from aqueous solutions, resulting in API:counterion ratios of 1:1.1, 1:2.1 and 1:3.1. The experiments were subjected to a temperature profile including three heating-cooling cycles between 5-50° C. and aging at 25° C. for 3 days (FIG. 1).

Upon completion of the aging time, the solids were separated from the liquid phases, dried under vacuum at 50° C. and analyzed by HT-XRPD. The solutions (from the experiments that did not show solids after the temperature profile) and the mother liquors were left to evaporate at room conditions, and the residual solids were analyzed by HT-XRPD. Subsequently, all the solids were exposed to accelerated aging conditions (AAC) at 40° C./75% RH for 48 hours and re-measured by HT-XRPD to test their physical stability.

Scale-Up of Salts

The mesylate salt, Mes2, was scaled-up to 0.5-gram scale (Exp. ID SSm71). 500 mg of the free base was dissolved in 23 mL of acetone (concentration=26 mg/mL) at RT. Methanesulfonic acid (1M water solution) was added to reach an API:CI molar ratio of 1:2.1. Precipitation of the salt was observed upon addition of the counterion. The suspension was heated to 50° C. and left to equilibrate with continuous stirring at 50° C. for 8 hours. The salt suspension was cooled down to 25° C. The solids were isolated, dried under deep vacuum (10 mbar at 50° C.) and analyzed by HT- and HR-XRPD, TGA/TGMS, DSC, LCMS, 1H-NMR and DVS.

The camsylate salt, Camp2, was scaled-up at 0.3-gram scale (Exp. ID SSm73). 300 mg of free base was dissolved in 15 mL of ACN (concentration=20 mg/mL) at 50° C. Camphor-10-sulfonic acid (136 mg) was added to reach an API:CI molar ratio of 1:1.1. The counterion dissolved, and the solution was left to equilibrate with continuous stirring at 50° C. for 1 hour. The solution was cooled down to 25° C. and aged for 72 hours. The salt had precipitated during the cooling profile. The solids were isolated, dried under deep vacuum (10 mbar at 50° C.) and analyzed by HT- and HR-XRPD, TGA/TGMS, DSC, LCMS, 1H-NMR and DVS.

Physical and Chemical Stability

Physical stability studies (see Table 3) over a prolonged period of time (up to 2 years) were conducted at defined temperatures and relative humidity values (25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH) on the mesylate (Mes2), camsylate (Camp2), and maleate (Mae2) salts. As a reference, a sample of ABN-401 free base was also included in this stability study. At timepoints of 1, 3, 15 and 24 months, the vials containing the solid were analyzed by XRPD, TGMS and HPLC to determine if changes in the solid form had occurred, to confirm the water/solvent content and if chemical degradation occurred after storage at the different conditions.

TABLE 3

Experimental conditions for the stability study performed on the camsylate (Camp2),

maleate (Mae2), mesylate (Mes2) salts and ABN-401 free base (FB).

Exp ID
Condition
Salt form
Time
Mass (mg)

GEN50
25° C./60% RH
Camp2
1 month
28.8

GEN51

3 months
23.7

GEN52

15 months
23.5

GEN53

24 months
19.2

GEN54
40° C./75% RH

1 month
26.8

GEN55

3 months
21.6

GEN56

15 months
18.4

GEN57

24 months
19.1

GEN58
25° C./60% RH
Mae2
1 month
20.7

GEN59

3 months
19.1

GEN60

15 months
23.8

GEN61

24 months
22.3

GEN62
40° C./75% RH

1 month
17.4

GEN63

3 months
17.0

GEN64

24 months
17.4

GEN65

15 months
22.5

GEN66
25° C./60% RH
Mes2
1 month
23.2

GEN67

3 months
23.2

GEN68

15 months
29.9

GEN69

24 months
23.5

GEN70
40° C./75% RH

1 month
27.3

GEN71

3 months
20.3

GEN72

24 months
26.9

GEN73

15 months
23.1

GEN78
25° C./60% RH
FB
1 month
21.0

GEN79

3 months
22.3

GEN80

15 months
19.5

GEN81

24 months
20.6

GEN74
40° C./75% RH

1 month
18.9

GEN75

3 months
21.4

GEN76

24 months
20.1

GEN77

15 months
22.1

High Throughput X-Ray Powder Diffraction

HT-XRPD patterns were obtained using the Crystallics T2 high-throughput XRPD set-up. The plates were mounted on a Bruker General Area Detector Diffraction System (GADDS) equipped with a VANTEC-500 gas area detector corrected for intensity and geometric variations. The calibration of the measurement accuracy (peaks position) was performed using NIST SRM1976 standard (Corundum).

Data collection was carried out at room temperature using monochromatic Cu Kα radiation in the 2θ region between 1.5° and 41.5°, which is the most distinctive part of the XRPD pattern. The diffraction pattern of each well was collected in two 20 ranges (1.5°≤2θ≤21.5° for the first frame, and 19.5°≤2θ≤41.5° for the second) with an exposure time of 90 s for each frame. No background subtraction or curve smoothing was applied to the XRPD patterns. The carrier material used during HT-XRPD analysis was transparent to X-rays and contributed only slightly to the background.

High Resolution X-Ray Powder Diffraction

The powder data were collected on D8 Advance diffractometer using Cu K 1 radiation (1.54056 Å) with germanium monochromator at Room Temperature. The data were collected from 4 to 45 2 with 0.016 2 steps on solid state LynxEye detector with 22 sec/step speed. The sample was measured in 8 mm long glass capillary with 0.3 mm outer diameter.

TGMS Analysis

Mass loss due to solvent or water loss from the crystals was determined by TGA. Monitoring the sample weight, during heating in a TGA/DSC 3+ STARe system (Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Switzerland), resulted in a weight vs. temperature curve and a heat flow signal. The TGA/DSC 3+ was calibrated for temperature with samples of indium and aluminum. Samples (circa 2 mg) were weighed into 100 μL aluminum crucibles and sealed. The seals were pin-holed, and the crucibles heated in the TGA from 25 to 300° C. at a heating rate of 10° C./min. Dry N2 gas was used for purging.

The gases coming from the TGA samples were analyzed by a mass spectrometer Omnistar GSD 301 T2 (Pfeiffer Vacuum GmbH, Germany). The latter is a quadrupole mass spectrometer, which analyzes masses in the temperature range of 0-200 amu.

DSC Analysis

The DSC thermograms were recorded with a heat flux DSC3+ STARe system (Mettler—Toledo GmbH, Switzerland). The DSC3+ was calibrated for temperature and enthalpy with a small piece of indium (m.p.=156.6° C.; δHf=28.45 J/g) and zinc (m.p.=419.6° C.; δHf=107.5 J/g). Samples were sealed in standard 40 μL aluminum pans, pin-holed and heated in the DSC from 25 to 300° C., at a heating rate of 10° C./min. Dry N2 gas, at a flow rate of 50 mL/min was used to purge the DSC equipment during measurement.

¹H-NMR Analysis

The ¹H-NMR spectra were recorded at RT on a 500 MHz Bruker instrument using standard pulse sequences. The samples were dissolved and analyzed in DMSO-d₆. The data were processed with ACD Labs software Spectrus Processor 2016.2.2 (Advanced Chemistry Development Inc., Canada).

LCMS Analysis

Starting material characterization and purity assessment of the novel crystalline forms of the free base:

- Method name: S19061_03.NM
- Sample:
- Concentration: 0.3 mg/mil
- Diluent: Acetonitrile

TABLE 4

Instrument
Agilent 1200 series with diode array UV detector

Mobile phase A
10 mM Ammonium acetate in Water

Mobile phase B
Acetonitrile

Column
Waters Sunfire C18 (100 × 4.6 mm; 3.5 μm).

Detection:
UV at 280 nm, bandwidth 4 nm, UV spectrum 200 to

400 nm

Flow:
1.0 mL/min.

Run time
10 minutes

Injection volume
5 μL

Column temp.
35° C.

Autosampler temp.
Ambient

Gradient:
Time [min.]
Elnent A [%]
Elnent B [%]

0
90
10

2.5
50
50

8
10
90

10
90
10

Assay and Purity Assessment of the Novel Crystalline Salts

Method name: S19061_01.M

Sample:

Concentration: 0.3 mg/ml

Diluent: Acetonitrile/water (50/50)

TABLE 5

Instrument
Agilent 1260 series with diode array UV detector

Mobile phase A
20 mM Ammonium carbonate, pH = 9.4

Mobile phase B
ACN:IPA:water:TFE (68:22:9:1)

Column
Waters XBridge BEH C18 (100 × 4.6 mm; 3.5 μm)

Detection:
UV at 282 nm, bandwidth 4 nm, UV spectrum 200 to

400 nm

Flow:
1.4 mL/min.

Run time
10 minutes

Injection volume
5 μL

Column temp.
60° C.

Autosampler temp.
Ambient

Gradient:
Time [min.]
Eluent A [%]
Eluent B [%]

10
60
40

DVS Analysis

Differences in hygroscopicity (moisture uptake) of the various forms of a solid material provided a measure of their relative stability at increasing relative humidity. Moisture sorption isotherms of small samples were obtained using a DVS-1 system from Surface Measurement Systems (London, UK); this instrument is suitable for use with as little as a few milligrams of sample, with an accuracy of 0.1 μg. The relative humidity was varied during sorption-desorption-sorption (40-95-0-40% RH) at a constant temperature of 25° C., typically with a hold time of 60 minutes per step (10% relative humidity step). At the end of the DVS experiment the sample was measured by XRPD.

The hygroscopicity was classified according to the European Pharmacopoeia Hygroscopicity classification. Water uptake percentage at 25° C./80% RH (24 h) is:

Change in mass <0.2%—Non-hygroscopic

Change in mass >0.2% & <2%—Slightly hygroscopic

Change in mass >2% & <15%—Moderately hygroscopic

Change in mass >15%—Very hygroscopic

Mesylate Salts

FIG. 4 shows the HT-XRPD pattern of all the mesylate salts compared to that of the free base (Form A).

Mes1 was obtained from the salt formation experiments performed with methanesulfonic acid with an API:CI molar ratio of 1:1 in all three solvents. Table 24 reports the experimental conditions producing Mes1. The solid selected for further characterization was the salt crystallized from acetone with 1 molar equivalent of methanesulfonic acid (Exp. ID SSm4). Mes1 was physically stable after exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days (FIG. 5).

TABLE 6

Experimental conditions producing Mes1. *Solids recovered after

evaporation of the solvent.

API:CI

Exp. ID
Ratio 1:x
Solvent
Form
Form after AAC

SSm4
1
Acetone
Mes1
Mes1

SSm27
1
1,2-Dimethoxyethane
Mes1
Mes1

SSm50*
1
ACN
Mes1
Mes1

The TGA/TGMS analysis of Mes1 (FIG. 6) showed a mass loss of 4.3% from 25 to 140° C. attributed to acetone and water based on the MS signal. The thermal decomposition is observed at temperatures above 230° C.

The heat flow signal of the TGA showed a broad endothermic event related to the mass loss and an endothermic event at around 160° C., that could be related to the melting of an anhydrous form. The thermal analysis suggested that Mes1 could be a mix hydrated/solvated crystalline salt.

Mes2 was obtained from the salt formation experiments performed with methanesulfonic acid with API:CI molar ratios of 1:2 in all three crystallization solvents and with ratio 1:3 in ACN. Table 7 reports the experimental conditions producing Mes2. The solid selected for further characterization was the salt crystallized from acetone with two molar equivalents of methanesulfonic acid (Exp. ID SSm5). Mes2 was physically stable after exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days (FIG. 7).

TABLE 7

Experimental conditions producing Mes2.

API:CI

Exp. ID
Ratio 1:x
Solvent
Form
Form after AAC

SSm5
2
Acetone
Mes2
Mes2

SSm28
2
1,2-Dimethoxyethane
Mes2
Mes2

SSm51
2
ACN
Mes2
Mes2

SSm52
3
ACN
Mes2
Mes2

The TGA/TGMS analysis of Mes2 (FIG. 8) showed a gradual mass loss of 4.6% from 25 to 150° C. attributed mainly to water based on the MS signal (4.6% corresponds to 2.0 molecules of water per salt molecule). The thermal decomposition is observed at temperatures above 220° C.

The heat flow signal of the TGA showed a broad endothermic event related to the water loss and an endothermic event at around 210° C., that could be related to the melting of an anhydrous form. The thermal analysis suggested that Mes2 could be a di-hydrate salt form of the di-mesylate salt.

The DSC trace of Mes2 (FIG. 9) showed a broad endothermic event between 25 and 120° C., probably associated with the water loss. A double endothermic event was recorded around 218.2° C. corresponding most likely to the melting of a potential anhydrous salt, followed by an exothermic event from 223° C. that could be attributed to the thermal decomposition.

The chemical purity of Mes2 was assessed by LCMS to 100% (FIG. 10) confirming that the API was present in the solid phase Mes2.

The 1H-NMR analysis of Mes2 is shown in FIG. 11. The shift of the API resonances observed in the spectrum of Mes2 could suggest that proton transfer took place from the acidic counterion to the free base. The ratio API:CI turned out to be 1:2. At 2.2 ppm the signal of residual acetone was observed.

Mes3 was obtained from the salt formation experiment crystallized from acetone and 1,2-dimethoxyethane with three molar equivalents of methanesulfonic acid. The solid selected for further characterization was the salt crystallized from acetone with three molar equivalents of methanesulfonic acid (Exp. ID SSm6). Table 26 reports the experimental conditions producing Mes3. Although the crystallinity remained, Mes3 became deliquescent after exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days (FIG. 12).

TABLE 8

Experimental conditions producing Mes3.

API:CI

Exp. ID
Ratio 1:x
Solvent
Form
Form after AAC

SSm6
3
Acetone
Mes3
Mes3 (deliquescent)

SSm29
3
1,2-Dimethoxyethane
Mes3
Mes3 (deliquescent)

The TGA/TGMS analysis of Mes3 (FIG. 13) showed a mass loss of 5.6% from 25 to 140° C. attributed to water based on the MS signal (5.6% corresponds to 2.8 molecules of water per salt molecule). The thermal decomposition is observed at temperatures above 220° C. The heat flow signal of the TGA showed a broad endothermic event related to the mass loss and an endothermic event at 200° C., followed by thermal decomposition. The thermal analysis suggested that Mes3 could be a hydrated crystalline salt form.

Camsylate Salts

FIG. 14 shows the HT-XRPD patterns of the camsylate salts compared to that of the starting material (Form A).

Camp1 was obtained from the salt formation experiments performed with camphor-10-sulfonic acid in acetone and 1,2-dimethoxyethane when an API:CI ratio of 1:1 was applied. Table 9 reports the experimental conditions producing Camp1. The solid selected for further characterization was the salt crystallized from acetone with one molar equivalent of camphor-10-sulfonic acid (Exp. ID SSm14). Camp1 was physically stable upon exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days (FIG. 15).

TABLE 9

Experimental conditions producing Camp1.

API:CI

Exp. ID
Ratio 1:x
Solvent
Form
Form after AAC

SSm14
1
Acetone
Camp1
Camp1

SSm37
1
1,2-Dimethoxyethane
Camp1
Camp1

The TGA/TGMS analysis of Camp1 (FIG. 16) showed a mass loss of 3.3% from 25 to 120° C. attributed to most likely water (3.3% corresponds to 1.5 molecule of water per salt molecule). The thermal decomposition is observed at temperatures above 240° C. In the heat flow signal a sharp endothermic event was observed at around 160° C. possibly attributed to the melting of an anhydrous phase of the salt.

The DSC trace of Camp1 (FIG. 17) showed broad endothermic events between 25 to 120° C., that could be related to the water loss. An endothermic event was observed at 164.0° C. that could be related to the melting of a potential anhydrous salt.

The chemical purity of Camp1 was assessed by LCMS to 100% (FIG. 18) confirming that the API was present in the solid phase Camp1.

The ¹H-NMR analysis of Camp1 is shown in FIG. 19. The shifts of the API resonances observed in the spectrum of Camp1 could suggest that proton transfer took place from the acidic counterion to the free base. The ratio API:CI turned out to be 1:1. At 2.1 ppm the signal of traces acetone was observed.

Camp2 was obtained from the salt formation experiment performed with camphor-10-sulfonic acid in ACN and an API:CI ratio of 1:1 (Exp. ID SSm60). Table 10 reports the experimental conditions producing Camp2. Camp2 was physically stable upon exposure to AAC (40° C./75% RH) for 2 days (FIG. 20).

TABLE 10

Experimental conditions producing Camp2.

API:CI

Exp. ID
Ratio 1:x
Solvent
Form
Form after AAC

SSm60
1
ACN
Camp2
Camp2

The TGA/TGMS analysis of Camp2 (FIG. 21) showed a mass loss of 1.6% from 25 to 100° C. attributed to water, based on the MS signal (1.6% corresponds to 0.7 molecules of water per salt molecule). The thermal decomposition is observed at temperatures above 240° C.

In the heat flow signal a sharp endothermic event was observed at around 200° C. attributed most likely to the melting of an anhydrous phase of the salt, followed by decomposition.

The DSC trace of Camp2 (FIG. 22) showed a broad endothermic event between 25 and 70° C., associated with the water loss. An endothermic event was recorded at 208.9° C. that could possibly be correlated to the melting of an anhydrous phase of the salt.

A sample of Camp2 (Exp. ID. SSm60) was dried at 80° C. under vacuum with the aim of isolating a potential anhydrous form melting at 208.9° C. observed in the DSC trace. The solid collected was analyzed by HT-XRPD and TGMS. The solid remained Camp2, containing 1.9% of water (FIG. 23).

The chemical purity of Camp2 was assessed by LCMS to 100% (FIG. 24) confirming that the API was present in the solid phase Camp2.

The ¹H-NMR analysis of Camp2 is shown in FIG. 25. The shift of the API resonances observed in the spectrum of Camp2 could suggest that proton transfer took place from the acidic counterion to the free base. The ratio API:CI turned out to be 1:1.

Analytical Characterization of Mes2

The HT- and HR-XRPD analysis confirmed the crystallization of Mes2 in the scale-up experiment (Exp. ID: SSm71) (FIG. 26). The High Resolution XRPD (HR-XRPD) pattern of Mes2 could not be indexed.

The TGA/TGMS analysis of dried Mes2 (FIG. 27) showed a gradual mass loss of 4.0% between 25-110° C., attributed to water based on the MS signal (4.0% corresponds to 1.8 molecules of water per salt molecule). Thermal decomposition of Mes2 was observed above 240° C.

The DSC traces of Mes2 (FIG. 28) showed one broad endothermic event between 25 and 110° C., associated with the water loss. The double endothermic event observed at 205-217° C. could be related to melting processes of the salt. The chemical purity of Mes2 was assessed by LCMS to 99.6% (FIG. 29) confirming that the API was present in the solid phase Mes2.

The ¹H-NMR analysis of Mes2 is shown in FIG. 30. The shift of the API resonances observed in the spectrum of Mes2 could suggest that proton transfer took place from the acidic counterion to the free base. The ratio API:CI was confirmed to be 1:2.

FIG. 31 reports the results of the DVS measurement performed on Mes2. In the first sorption half-cycle the water vapor uptake reached 29.6% at 95% RH (24.8% change of mass in the range 40→95% RH). During the desorption cycle, from 95 to 0% RH, water was released. In the last sorption half-cycle, the change in mass was 4.6% (in the range 0→40% RH). The water uptake did not reach equilibrium during each step change (1 hour equilibrium per step) in relative humidity, causing a seemingly hysteresis between 95-70% RH in the sorption and desorption cycle. The water uptake was reversible.

At 80% RH the change in mass was approximately 12.2%. Therefore, the mesylate salt Mes2 could be considered moderately hygroscopic (based on the European Pharmacopeia Hygroscopicity classification). No change in the solid form was observed after the DVS analysis.

Analytical Characterization of Camp2

The HT- and HR-XRPD analysis confirmed the crystallization of Camp2 in the scale-up experiment (Exp. ID: SSm73) (FIG. 32). The High Resolution XRPD (HR-XRPD) data of Camp2 could not be indexed.

The TGA/TGMS analysis of dried Camp2 (FIG. 33) showed a pronounced mass loss of 1.6% between 25-80° C., attributed to water based on the MS signal (1.6% corresponds to 0.7 molecules of water per salt molecule). Thermal decomposition of Camp2 was observed above 240° C.

The DSC trace of Camp2 (FIG. 34) showed one broad endothermic event, between 25 and 80° C., associated with the water loss. A second sharp endothermic event was observed at 208.6° C. most likely related to the melting of an anhydrous phase of the salt.

The chemical purity of Camp2 was assessed by LCMS to 99.7% (FIG. 35) confirming that the API was present in the solid phase Camp2.

The ¹H-NMR analysis of Camp2 is shown in FIG. 36. The shift of the API resonances observed in the spectrum of Camp2 could suggest that proton transfer took place from the acidic counterion to the free base. The ratio API:CI was confirmed to be 1:1.

FIG. 37 reports the results of the DVS measurement performed on Camp2. In the first sorption half-cycle the water vapor uptake reached 15.6% at 95% RH (14.1% change in mass in the range 40→95% RH). The change in mass plot (left figure) showed that the water sorption had not reached equilibrium during sorption at 90-95% RH. During the desorption cycle, from 95 to 0% RH, water was released. In the last sorption half-cycle, the change in mass was 6.6% (in the range 0→40% RH). The water uptake was irreversible, suggesting a form change occurred. A new form, designated as Camp4, was identified by HT-XRPD in the recovered solid (FIG. 38).

The DVS analysis showed a change in mass at 80% RH of 1.4% suggesting that this material is slightly hygroscopic (based on the European Pharmacopeia Hygroscopicity classification).

Stability of Free Base

The TGA traces of the 3-months samples of Form A exposed to 25° C./60% RH and to 40° C./75% RH are shown in FIG. 40A, B. Water loss of 4.1% and 4.4% was observed, respectively, for the samples exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH for 3 months. The heat flow signals showed broad endotherm attributed to the water loss followed by a melting event at 140° C. corresponding to the melting of Form A. The thermal decomposition for both samples was observed above 230° C.

The TGA traces of the 15-months samples of Form A exposed to 25° C./60% RH and to 40° C./75% RH are shown in FIG. 41A, B. Water loss of 3.3% and 3.7% was observed, respectively, for the samples exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH for 15 months. The heat flow signals showed broad endotherm attributed to the water loss followed by a melting event at 140° C. corresponding to the melting of Form A. The thermal decomposition for both samples was observed above 230° C.

The TGA traces of the 24-months samples of Form A exposed to 25° C./60% RH and to 40° C./75% RH are shown in FIG. 42A, B. Water loss of 5.3% and 5.2% was observed, respectively, for the samples exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH for 24 months. The heat flow signals showed broad endotherm attributed to the water loss followed by a melting event at 140° C. corresponding to the melting of Form A. No thermal decomposition was observed below 200° C.

The chemical purity of Form A after 24 months exposure to 25° C./60% RH (Exp. ID GEN81) and to 40° C./75% RH (Exp. ID GEN76) assessed by LCMS was 87.2% and 90.7%, respectively (FIG. 43 and FIG. 44), confirming that chemical degradation is occurring at both conditions.

Stability of Mesylate Salt

The HT-XRPD analysis confirmed that over time solid form conversions occurred upon exposure of Mes2 to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH. The changes happened faster at 40° C./75% RH than at 25° C./60% RH. There were no significant differences in the powder patterns of Mes2 for the sample exposed to 25° C./60% RH for 3 months, however, after 15 months additional diffraction peaks were detected at 15.1 and 16.5° 20. This diffraction peaks could be attributed to other crystalline phase; however, the nature of that phase is unknown. The sample exposed to 40° C./75% RH showed these additional peaks after 3 months. After 15 months all peaks of the XRPD were shifted and therefore, it was designated Mes4, while the additional peaks at 15.1 and 16.5° 2θ were still present. After 24 months the solids exposed to both conditions had converted to a novel form and were designed Mes6. FIG. 45 shows an overlay of the powder patterns of Mes2 obtained in the scale-up and upon exposure to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH for 1, 3, 15 and 24 months.

Results of TGA analysis on samples of Mes2 exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH for 1 month are shown in FIG. 46 A, B. A water loss of 8.0% was observed for the sample exposed to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month and of 10.8% for the sample exposed to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month. Thermal decomposition for both samples was observed above 230° C. A significant water uptake was observed in both samples compared to the initial water content determined for Mes2 (3.9%).

The water uptake was also confirmed in the 3 months samples. The TGA analyses are shown in FIG. 47A, B. A water loss of 7.7% and 11.2% were detected for the 3-months samples exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH, respectively.

The thermal behavior of the samples after 15 months exposure to the storage conditions were similar as the previous samples, although the mass losses were a little less. The TGA analyses are shown in FIG. 48A, B. A water loss of 6.5% and 9.6% were detected for the 15-months samples exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH, respectively.

After 24 months, Mes2 showed mass losses of about 8.6 and 12.0% after incubation at 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH, respectively (FIG. 49A, B). Similar thermal behavior was recorded in the heat flow signal. The start of an endotherm at 200° C. was observed which could be attributed to the thermal decomposition of the mesylate salt.

The chemical purity of Mes2 after exposure to 25° C./60% RH (Exp. ID GEN66) and 40° C./75% RH (Exp. ID GEN70) for 1 month was assessed by LCMS at 100% (FIG. 50) and 99.7% (FIG. 51) confirming that the API was present in the solid phase Mes2 with a similar chemical purity as the initial Mes2 salt.

After 3 months, the chemical purities were 99.6 and 99.5% (area %) for the samples exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH, respectively (FIG. 52 and FIG. 53).

After 15 months, the chemical purities were 100% (area %) for the samples exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH (FIG. 54 and FIG. 55). After 24 months, the chemical purities were 99.6% and 100% (area %) for the samples exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH, respectively (FIG. 56 and FIG. 57).

Stability of Camsylate Salt

The HT-XRPD analysis confirmed that no solid form conversion occurred upon exposure of Camp2 to 25° C./60% RH up to 24 months. However, at 40° C./75% RH, solid form conversions were observed after 3 months. The new powder pattern could be assigned to the powder pattern of Camp4 (identified previously after a DVS analysis performed on Camp2, FIG. 38). After 24 months further conversions were observed possibly to a mixture of a camsylate salt and Form E of the free base. In FIG. 58, an overlay of the powder patterns of Camp2 obtained in the scale-up and after exposure to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH for 1, 3, 15 and 24 months is presented.

The TGA analyses of the solids of Camp2 exposed to 25° C./60% RH and 40° C./75% RH for 1 month are shown in FIGS. 59 A and 59 B. A water loss of 1.6% was observed for the sample exposed to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month and 1.8% for the sample exposed to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month. Thermal decomposition for both samples was observed above 240° C.

The sample of Camp2 incubated at 25° C./60% RH for 3 months showed a similar water content to that recorded after 1-month (FIG. 60A), meaning that no significant water uptake occurred at this condition. However, at 40° C./75% RH, solid form conversion of Camp2 to Camp4 was observed; therefore, the TGA analysis (FIG. 60B) showed a water content of 7.1% (3.3 molecules of water per molecule of camsylate salt). The thermal behavior recorded in the heat flow signal showed a broad endotherm attributed to the water released followed by an endotherm at 150° C. which could be attributed to the melting of an anhydrous phase (different to Camp2, melting at 200° C.).

The sample of Camp2 incubated at 25° C./60% RH for 15 months showed a similar water content to that recorded after 1 and 3 months (FIG. 61A), meaning that no significant water uptake occurred at this condition. At 40° C./75% RH, Camp4 remained Camp4 up to 15 months. Also the water content remained similar to the water content observed after 3 months, the TGA analysis (FIG. 61B) showed a water content of 6.9% (3.3 molecules of water per molecule of camsylate salt). The thermal behavior recorded in the heat flow signal showed a broad endotherm attributed to the water released followed by an endotherm at 150° C. which could be attributed to the melting of an anhydrous phase (different to Camp2, melting at 200° C.).

The sample of Camp2 incubated at 25° C./60% RH for 24 months showed a mass loss of 1.9%, similar to mass loss measured at previous timepoints (FIG. 62A), meaning that no significant water uptake occurred at this condition. The TGA analysis on the solid obtained after 24 month exposure to 40° C./75% RH (FIG. 62B) showed a water content of 6.7% (3.2 molecules of water per molecule of camsylate salt). The thermal behavior recorded in the heat flow signal showed a broad endotherm attributed to the water released followed by an endotherm at 150° C. which could be attributed to the melting of an anhydrous phase (different to Camp2, melting at 200° C.).

The chemical purity of Camp2 after exposure to 25° C./60% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN50) upon exposure to 40° C./75% RH for 1 month (Exp. ID GEN54) was assessed by LCMS at 99.8% in both cases (FIG. 63 and FIG. 64) confirming that the API was present in the solid phase Camp2. After 3-months exposure, the chemical purity was comparable to the 1-month samples (FIG. 65 and FIG. 66).

The chemical purity of Camp2 after 15 months exposure to 25° C./60% RH (Exp. ID GEN52) assessed by LCMS was 99.5% (FIG. 67), confirming that Camp2 is stable under this condition at least up to 15 months. The chemical purity of Camp4 after 15 months exposure to 40° C./75% RH (Exp. ID GEN56) assessed by LCMS was 93.7% (FIG. 68), confirming that once Camp2 had converted to Camp4 chemical degradation occurred at 40° C./75% RH.

The chemical purity of Camp2 after 24 months exposure to 25° C./60% RH (Exp. ID GEN53) assessed by LCMS was 100% (FIG. 69), confirming that Camp2 is stable under this condition at least up to 24 months. The chemical purity of the camsylate salt after 24 months exposure to 40° C./75% RH (Exp. ID GEN57) assessed by LCMS was 88.6% (FIG. 70), confirming that once Camp2 had converted to different forms chemical degradation occurred at 40° C./75% RH.

All technical literature or patents cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety in the specific context indicated.

While the present invention has been disclosed with reference to certain embodiments, numerous modifications, alterations, and changes to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the sphere and scope of the present invention, as defined in the appended claims. Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but that it has the full scope defined by the language of the claims listed below, and equivalents thereof.

MESYLATE SALTS OF TRIAZOLOPYRAZINE DERIVATIVES

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

Original Assignees

CPC

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims