Patent Application
20230279444
The present invention relates generally to genes and polypeptides which have utility in engineering or modifying quillaic acid production or hydrolysis in host cells. The invention further relates to systems, methods and products employing the same.
Plants produce a wide variety of cyclic triterpenes, such as sterols and triterpenoids, which are the major products of the mevalonate (MVA) pathway.
QS-21 is a complex triterpenoid saponin synthesised by the Chilean tree Quillaja saponaria (order Fabales).
The core QS-21 triterpene backbone is quillaic acid (“QA”); this scaffold is decorated with a branched trisaccharide, present at the C-3 position and a linear tetrasaccharide at the C-28 position. The C-28 linear tetrasaccharide also features a complex arabinosylated acyl chain (
QS-21 has utility as an immunostimulatory adjuvant. However the biological sources of QS-21 are limited, and due to the complexity of its structure, and that of QA, chemical synthesis is challenging.
Accordingly it can be seen that novel systems for synthesising QA, which has utility inter alia in the preparation of QS-21, would provide a contribution to the art.
The core aglycone of QS-21 (quillaic acid) is a derivative of the simple triterpene, β-amyrin, which is in turn synthesised by cyclisation of the universal linear precursor 2,3-oxidosqualene (OS) by oxidosqualene cyclases (OSCs) (
The β-amyrin scaffold is further oxidised with an alcohol, aldehyde and carboxylic acid at the C-16α, C-23 and C-28 positions, respectively, to form quillaic acid. A proposed linear biosynthetic pathway for this is given in
QA biosynthesis from OS thus includes at least four different enzymatic steps. The enzymes involved include:
The oxidised derivatives of β-amyrin arising from successive oxidations by these enzymes are shown in
By way of example, using the illustrative scheme of
The present inventors have successfully engineered the entire QA biosynthetic pathway into heterologous organisms which are not otherwise QA producers. Specifically, the present inventors demonstrated the invention by co-infiltration of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains into N. benthamiana. This is the first description of heterologous production of quillaic acids achieved by co-expression of biosynthetic genes, and represents a major contribution to the art.
More specifically, the present inventors demonstrated that a minimum of four additional genes was sufficient for QA biosynthesis (bAS, and 3 CYP450s). These were advantageously combined with an optional HMG-CoA reductase to increase product levels.
Furthermore, in a further contribution to the art, the present inventors have identified genes in Quillaja saponaria coding for polypeptides affecting QA biosynthesis.
The methods and materials described herein can be used, inter alia, to produce recombinant host organisms (for example plants or microorganisms) which can produce QAs even though they are not naturally produced by the wild-type host.
De novo engineering of quillaic acids according to the present invention can produce plants or microorganisms containing high amounts of QA, which can in turn be used - for example - for further chemical synthesis of QS-21 [18].
Thus in one aspect of the invention there is provided a method of converting a host from a phenotype whereby the host is unable to carry out QA biosynthesis from OS to a phenotype whereby the host is able to carry out said QA biosynthesis,
Preferably the nucleic acid encodes some or all (one, two, three or four) of the following enzymes:
In certain embodiments these CYP450 enzymes may be:
Other potential intermediates will be understood by those skilled in the art in the light of the disclosure herein, and in particular
For brevity these enzymes may be referred to as “bAS”, “C-28 oxidase”, “C-16α oxidase”, and “C-23 oxidase” respectively herein.
For further brevity these enzymes may be referred to collectively as “QA polypeptides” herein.
In one embodiment at least one of the QA polypeptides originates from (is derived from) Q. saponaria Preferably 2, 3 or all 4 of the QA polypeptides originate from Q. saponaria
In one embodiment:
Preferred genes or polypeptides for use in the practice of the invention are shown in the Sequence Annex.
In preferred embodiments, the one, two, three or four of the respective polypeptides are selected from the Q. saponaria sequences listed in Table 1 e.g. as follows:
In other embodiments, the one, two, or three of the respective polypeptides are selected from the non-Q. saponaria sequences listed in Table 2a, 2b or 2c e.g. as follows:
In certain embodiments the QA polypeptides are encoded by a nucleotide sequence shown in any of SEQ ID: Nos 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, or 17.
or variants or fragments thereof as discussed below.
In other embodiments, the C-28 oxidase is a polypeptide encoded by one of the non-Q. saponaria accessions listed in Table 2d as SEQ ID Nos 19-28: (VvCYP716A15, VvCYP716A17, PgCYP716A52v2, MICYP716A75, CqCYP716A78, CqCYP716A79, BvCYP716A80, BvCYP716A81, MdCYP716A175 or CrCYP716AL1), or is a variant or fragment thereof as discussed below. These nucleotide sequences are respectively referred to herein as SEQ ID NOs: 19-28.
For brevity the nucleotide sequences of any of Tables 1 and 2 may be referred to herein as “QA genes”
In addition to use of these QA genes (and polypeptides) the invention encompasses use of variants of these genes (and polypeptides).
A “variant” QA nucleic acid or QA polypeptide molecule shares homology with, or is identical to, all or part of the QA genes or polypeptides discussed herein.
A variant polypeptide shares the relevant biological activity of the native QA polypeptide. A variant nucleic acid encodes the relevant variant polypeptide.
In this context the “biological activity” of the QA polypeptide is the ability to catalyse the respective reaction shown in
Table 8 shows pairwise comparisons of the P450 enzymes described herein, obtained using Clustal Omega (version 1.2.4 - accessed through https://www.ebi.ac.uk).
Variants of the sequences disclosed herein preferably share at least 50%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%, 60%, 65%, or 70%, or 80% identity, most preferably at least about 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% identity. Such variants may be referred to herein as “substantially homologous”.
Preferred variants may be:
(i) Naturally occurring nucleic acids such as alleles (which will include polymorphisms or mutations at one or more bases) or pseudoalleles (which may occur at closely linked loci to the QA genes of the invention). Also included are paralogues, isogenes, or other homologous genes belonging to the same families as the QA genes of the invention. Also included are orthologues or homologues from other plant species.
Table 4 illustrates minor sequence differences identified between the gene sequences as found in the 1KP dataset and the sequenced clones obtained by PCR from the Q. saponaria plants in the present disclosure. This demonstrates that even with a c. 1500 bp of OQHZ-2012090, there were 19 variations identified (more than 1% variation). Specifically envisaged by this disclosure are the use of QA genes or polypeptides including one or more of the variations described in Table 4 in the respective sequence. Furthermore, included within the scope of the present invention are nucleic acid molecules which encode amino acid sequences which are homologues of QA genes of the invention. Homology may be at the nucleotide sequence and/or amino acid sequence level, as discussed below.
(ii) Artificial nucleic acids, which can be prepared by the skilled person in the light of the present disclosure. Such derivatives may be prepared, for instance, by site directed or random mutagenesis, or by direct synthesis. Preferably the variant nucleic acid is generated either directly or indirectly (e.g. via one or more amplification or replication steps) from an original nucleic acid having all or part of the sequence of a QA gene of the invention.
Also included are nucleic acids corresponding to those above, but which have been extended at the 3′ or 5′ terminus.
The term “QA variant nucleic acid” as used herein encompasses all of these possibilities. When used in the context of polypeptides or proteins it indicates the encoded expression product of the variant nucleic acid.
In each case, the preferred QA-biosynthesis modifying nucleic acids are any of SEQ ID Nos 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 17, or substantially homologous variants thereof.
The preferred QA-biosynthesis modifying polypeptides are any of SEQ ID Nos 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18, or substantially homologous variants thereof.
Other preferred QA-biosynthesis modifying nucleic acids for use in the invention are any of SEQ ID Nos 19 to 28, or substantially homologous variants or fragments thereof. Other preferred QA-biosynthesis modifying polypeptides are polypeptides encoded by any of these sequences or variants or fragments.
In embodiments of the invention, in addition to the QA genes and variant nucleic acids of the invention described herein, it may be preferable to introduce additional genes which may affect flux of QA production.
For example MVA is an important intermediate in triterpenoid synthesis. Therefore it may be desirable to expression of rate-limiting MVA pathway genes into the host, to maximise yields of QA.
HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR) is believed to be a rate-limiting enzyme in the MVA pathway.
The use of a recombinant feedback-insensitive truncated form of HMGR (tHMGR) has been demonstrated to increase triterpene (β-amyrin) content upon transient expression in N. benthamiana [5], also
Thus one embodiment of the invention comprises the use of a heterologous HMGR (e.g. a feedback-insensitive HMGR) along with the QA genes described herein. Examples of HMGR encoding or polypeptide sequences include SEQ ID Nos 29 to 32, or variants or fragments of these. Variants may be homologues, alleles, or artificial derivatives etc. as discussed in relation to QA genes or polypeptides as described above. For example an HMGR native to the host being utilised may be preferred - for example a yeast HMGR in a yeast host, and so on. HMGR genes are known in the art and may be selected, as appropriate in the light of the present disclosure.
It has also been reported that squalene synthase (SQS; see
Thus one embodiment of the invention comprises the use of a heterologous SQS along with the QA genes and optionally HMGR described herein.
Examples of SQS encoding or polypeptide sequences include SEQ ID Nos 33 to 34, or variants or fragments of these. Variants may be homologues, alleles, or artificial derivatives etc. as discussed in relation to QA genes or polypeptides as described above. For example an SQS native to the host being utilised may be preferred - for example a yeast SQS in a yeast host, and so on. SQS genes are known in the art and may be selected, as appropriate in the light of the present disclosure.
When using certain hosts (for example yeasts) it may be desirable to introduce additional genes to improve the flux of QA production. Examples may include one or more plant cytochrome P450 reductases (CPRs) to serve as the redox partner to the introduced P450s. Thus one embodiment of the invention comprises the use of a heterologous cytochrome P450 reductase such as AtATR2 (Arabidopsis thaliana cytochrome P450 reductase 2) along with the QA genes described herein. Examples of HAtATR2 encoding or polypeptide sequences include SEQ ID Nos 35 to 36, or variants or fragments of these. Variants may be homologues, alleles, or artificial derivatives etc. as discussed in relation to QA genes or polypeptides as described above.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art, in the light of the present disclosure, that additional genes may be utilised in the practice of the invention, to provide additional activities and\or improve expression or activity. These include those expressing co-factor or helper proteins, or other factors. Examples may include genes involved in the synthesis of QS-21 from QA.
For brevity any of these nucleic acid sequences (the “QA genes of the invention” and “QA variant nucleic acids”, plus other genes effecting QA synthesis, or secondary modifications to QA) may be referred to herein as “QA nucleic acid” or “QA-biosynthesis modifying nucleic acid”. Likewise the encoded polypeptides may be referred to herein as “QA polypeptides” or “QA-biosynthesis modifying polypeptides”.
It will be appreciated that where these generic terms are used in relation to any aspect or embodiment, the meaning will be taken to applies to any of these sequences individually.
As one aspect of the invention there is disclosed a method employing the co-infiltration of a plurality of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains each carrying one or more of the QA nucleic acids discussed above for concerted expression thereof in a biosynthetic pathway discussed above.
In some embodiments at least 3 or 4 different Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains are co-infiltrated e.g. each carrying a QA nucleic acid.
The genes may be present from transient expression vectors.
A preferred expression system utilises the called “‘Hyper-Translatable’ Cowpea Mosaic Virus (‘CPMV-HT’) system, described in WO2009/087391 the disclosure of which is specifically incorporated herein in support of the embodiments using the CPMV-HT system - for example vectors based on pEAQ-HT expression plasmids.
Thus the vectors (typically binary vectors) for use in the present invention will typically comprise an expression cassette comprising:
Further examples of vectors and expression systems useful in the practice of the invention are described in more detail hereinafter.
In aspects of the invention a host may be converted from a phenotype whereby the host is unable to carry out effective QA biosynthesis from OS to a phenotype whereby the host is able to carry out said QA biosynthesis, such that QA can be recovered therefrom or utilised in vivo to synthesize downstream products. Examples hosts includes plants such as Nicotiana benthamiana and microorganisms such as yeast. These are discussed in more detail below.
The invention may comprise transforming the host with heterologous nucleic acid as described above by introducing the QA nucleic acid into the host cell via a vector and causing or allowing recombination between the vector and the host cell genome to introduce a nucleic acid according to the present invention into the genome.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a host cell transformed with a heterologous nucleic acid which comprises a plurality of nucleotide sequences each of which encodes a polypeptide which in combination have said QA biosynthesis activity,
wherein expression of said nucleic acid imparts on the transformed host the ability to carry out QA biosynthesis from OS, or improves said ability in the host.
The invention further encompasses a host cell transformed with nucleic acid or a vector as described above (e.g. comprising the QA-biosynthesis modifying nucleotide sequences) especially a plant or a microbial cell. In the transgenic host cell (i.e. transgenic for the nucleic acid in question) the transgene may be on an extra-genomic vector or incorporated, preferably stably, into the genome. There may be more than one heterologous nucleotide sequence per haploid genome.
The methods and materials described herein can be used, inter alia, to generate stable crop-plants that accumulate QA.
Plants which include a plant cell according to the invention are also provided.
The methods described above may be used to generate QA in a heterologous host. The QA will generally be non-naturally occurring in the species into which they are introduced.
QAs from the plants or methods of the invention may be isolated and commercially exploited.
The methods above may form a part of, possibly one step in, a method of producing QS-21 in a host. The method may comprise the steps of culturing the host (where it is a microorganism) or growing the host (where it is a plant) and then harvesting it and purifying the QA or QS-21 product therefrom. The product thus produced forms a further aspect of the present invention. The utility of QA or QS-21 products is described above.
Alternatively, QA may be recovered to allow for further chemical synthesis of QS-21 [18].
In support of the present invention, the present inventors have newly characterised sequences from Q. saponaria which are believed to be involved in the synthesis of QA in that species (see SEQ. ID: Nos 1-8)
In preferred embodiments, the methods of the present invention will include the use of one or more of these newly characterised QA nucleic acids of the invention (e.g. one, two, three or four such QA nucleic acids) optionally in conjunction with the manipulation of other genes affecting QA biosynthesis known in the art.
These newly characterised QA sequences from Q. saponaria (SEQ. ID: Nos 1-8) form aspects of the invention in their own right, as do derived variants and materials o these sequences, and methods of using them.
Some aspects and embodiments of the present invention will now be described in more detail.
In different embodiments, the present invention provides means for manipulation of total levels of QA in host cells such as microorganisms or plants.
In one aspect of the present invention, the QA-biosynthesis modifying nucleic acid described above is in the form of a recombinant and preferably replicable vector.
“Vector” is defined to include, inter alia, any plasmid, cosmid, phage or Agrobacterium binary vector in double or single stranded linear or circular form which may or may not be self-transmissible or mobilizable, and which can transform a prokaryotic or eukaryotic host either by integration into the cellular genome or exist extrachromosomally (e.g. autonomous replicating plasmid with an origin of replication).
As is well known to those skilled in the art, a “binary vector” system includes (a) border sequences which permit the transfer of a desired nucleotide sequence into a plant cell genome; (b) desired nucleotide sequence itself, which will generally comprise an expression cassette of (i) a plant active promoter, operably linked to (ii) the target sequence and\or enhancer as appropriate. The desired nucleotide sequence is situated between the border sequences and is capable of being inserted into a plant genome under appropriate conditions. The binary vector system will generally require other sequence (derived from A. tumefaciens) to effect the integration. Generally this may be achieved by use of so called “agro-infiltration” which uses Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation. Briefly, this technique is based on the property of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to transfer a portion of its DNA (“T-DNA”) into a host cell where it may become integrated into nuclear DNA. The T-DNA is defined by left and right border sequences which are around 21-23 nucleotides in length. The infiltration may be achieved e.g. by syringe (in leaves) or vacuum (whole plants). In the present invention the border sequences will generally be included around the desired nucleotide sequence (the T-DNA) with the one or more vectors being introduced into the plant material by agro-infiltration.
Generally speaking, those skilled in the art are well able to construct vectors and design protocols for recombinant gene expression. Suitable vectors can be chosen or constructed, containing appropriate regulatory sequences, including promoter sequences, terminator fragments, polyadenylation sequences, enhancer sequences, marker genes and other sequences as appropriate. For further details see, for example, Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual: 2nd edition, Sambrook et al, 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press or Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Second Edition, Ausubel et al. eds., John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
Specifically included are shuttle vectors by which is meant a DNA vehicle capable, naturally or by design, of replication in two different host organisms, which may be selected from actinomycetes and related species, bacteria and eucaryotic (e.g. higher plant, mosses, yeast or fungal cells).
A vector including nucleic acid according to the present invention need not include a promoter or other regulatory sequence, particularly if the vector is to be used to introduce the nucleic acid into cells for recombination into the genome.
Preferably the nucleic acid in the vector is under the control of, and operably linked to, an appropriate promoter or other regulatory elements for transcription in a host cell such as a microbial, e.g. yeast and bacterial, or plant cell. The vector may be a bi-functional expression vector which functions in multiple hosts. In the case of genomic DNA, this may contain its own promoter or other regulatory elements (optionally in combination with a heterologous enhancer, such as the 35S enhancer discussed in the Examples below). The advantage of using a native promoter is that this may avoid pleiotropic responses. In the case of cDNA this may be under the control of an appropriate promoter or other regulatory elements for expression in the host cell
By “promoter” is meant a sequence of nucleotides from which transcription may be initiated of DNA operably linked downstream (i.e. in the 3′ direction on the sense strand of double-stranded DNA).
“Operably linked” means joined as part of the same nucleic acid molecule, suitably positioned and oriented for transcription to be initiated from the promoter. DNA operably linked to a promoter is “under transcriptional initiation regulation” of the promoter.
In a preferred embodiment, the promoter is an inducible promoter.
The term “inducible” as applied to a promoter is well understood by those skilled in the art. In essence, expression under the control of an inducible promoter is “switched on” or increased in response to an applied stimulus. The nature of the stimulus varies between promoters. Some inducible promoters cause little or undetectable levels of expression (or no expression) in the absence of the appropriate stimulus. Other inducible promoters cause detectable constitutive expression in the absence of the stimulus. Whatever the level of expression is in the absence of the stimulus, expression from any inducible promoter is increased in the presence of the correct stimulus.
Thus nucleic acid according to the invention may be placed under the control of an externally inducible gene promoter to place expression under the control of the user. An advantage of introduction of a heterologous gene into a plant cell, particularly when the cell is comprised in a plant, is the ability to place expression of the gene under the control of a promoter of choice, in order to be able to influence gene expression, and therefore QA biosynthesis, according to preference. Furthermore, mutants and derivatives of the wild-type gene, e.g. with higher or lower activity than wild-type, may be used in place of the endogenous gene.
Thus this aspect of the invention provides a gene construct, preferably a replicable vector, comprising a promoter (optionally inducible) operably linked to a nucleotide sequence provided by the present invention, such as the QA-biosynthesis modifying gene, most preferably one of the Qs QA nucleic acids which are described below, or a derivative thereof.
Particularly of interest in the present context are nucleic acid constructs which operate as plant vectors. Specific procedures and vectors previously used with wide success upon plants are described by Guerineau and Mullineaux (1993) (Plant transformation and expression vectors. In: Plant Molecular Biology Labfax (Croy RRD ed) Oxford, BIOS Scientific Publishers, pp 121-148). Suitable vectors may include plant viral-derived vectors (see e.g. EP-A-194809).
Preferably the vectors of the present invention which are for use in plants comprise border sequences which permit the transfer and integration of the expression cassette into the plant genome. Preferably the construct is a plant binary vector. Preferably the binary transformation vector is based on pPZP (Hajdukiewicz, et al. 1994). Other example constructs include pBin19 (see Frisch, D. A., L. W. Harris-Haller, et al. (1995). “Complete Sequence of the binary vector Bin 19.” Plant Molecular Biology 27: 405-409).
Suitable promoters which operate in plants include the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S (CaMV 35S). Other examples are disclosed at pg. 120 of Lindsey & Jones (1989) “Plant Biotechnology in Agriculture” Pub. OU Press, Milton Keynes, UK. The promoter may be selected to include one or more sequence motifs or elements conferring developmental and/or tissue-specific regulatory control of expression. Inducible plant promoters include the ethanol induced promoter of Caddick et al (1998) Nature Biotechnology 16: 177-180.
If desired, selectable genetic markers may be included in the construct, such as those that confer selectable phenotypes such as resistance to antibiotics or herbicides (e.g. kanamycin, hygromycin, phosphinotricin, chlorsulfuron, methotrexate, gentamycin, spectinomycin, imidazolinones and glyphosate). Positive selection system such as that described by Haldrup et al. 1998 Plant molecular Biology 37, 287-296, may be used to make constructs that do not rely on antibiotics.
As explained above, a preferred vector is a ‘CPMV-HT’ vector as described in WO2009/087391. The Examples below demonstrate the use of these pEAQ-HT expression plasmids.
These vectors (typically binary vectors) for use in the present invention will typically comprise an expression cassette comprising:
“Enhancer” sequences (or enhancer elements), as referred to herein, are sequences derived from (or sharing homology with) the RNA-2 genome segment of a bipartite RNA virus, such as a comovirus, in which a target initiation site has been mutated. Such sequences can enhance downstream expression of a heterologous ORF to which they are attached. Without limitation, it is believed that such sequences when present in transcribed RNA, can enhance translation of a heterologous ORF to which they are attached.
A “target initiation site” as referred to herein, is the initiation site (start codon) in a wild-type RNA-2 genome segment of a bipartite virus (e.g. a comovirus) from which the enhancer sequence in question is derived, which serves as the initiation site for the production (translation) of the longer of two carboxy coterminal proteins encoded by the wild-type RNA-2 genome segment.
Typically the RNA virus will be a comovirus as described hereinbefore.
Most preferred vectors are the pEAQ vectors of WO2009/087391 which permit direct cloning version by use of a polylinker between the 5′ leader and 3′ UTRs of an expression cassette including a translational enhancer of the invention, positioned on a T-DNA which also contains a suppressor of gene silencing and an NPTII cassettes.
The presence of a suppressor of gene silencing in such gene expression systems is preferred but not essential. Suppressors of gene silencing are known in the art and described in WO/2007/135480. They include HcPro from Potato virus Y, He-Pro from TEV, P19 from TBSV, rgsCam, B2 protein from FHV, the small coat protein of CPMV, and coat protein from TCV. A preferred suppressor when producing stable transgenic plants is the P19 suppressor incorporating a R43W mutation.
The present invention also provides methods comprising introduction of such a construct into a plant cell or a microbial (e.g. bacterial, yeast or fungal) cell and/or induction of expression of a construct within a plant cell, by application of a suitable stimulus e.g. an effective exogenous inducer.
As an alternative to microorganisms, cell suspension cultures of QA-producing plant species, including also the moss Physcomitrella patens may be cultured in fermentation tanks (see e.g. Grotewold et al. (Engineering Secondary Metabolites in Maize Cells by Ectopic Expression of Transcription Factors, Plant Cell, 10, 721-740, 1998).
In a further aspect of the invention, there is disclosed a host cell containing a heterologous construct according to the present invention, especially a plant or a microbial cell.
The discussion of host cells above in relation to reconstitution of QA biosynthesis in heterologous organisms applies mutatis mutandis here.
Thus a further aspect of the present invention provides a method of transforming a plant cell involving introduction of a construct as described above into a plant cell and causing or allowing recombination between the vector and the plant cell genome to introduce a nucleic acid according to the present invention into the genome.
The invention further encompasses a host cell transformed with nucleic acid or a vector according to the present invention (e.g. comprising the QA-biosynthesis modifying nucleotide sequence) especially a plant or a microbial cell. In the transgenic plant cell (i.e. transgenic for the nucleic acid in question) the transgene may be on an extra-genomic vector or incorporated, preferably stably, into the genome. There may be more than one heterologous nucleotide sequence per haploid genome.
Yeast has seen extensive employment as a triterpene-producing host [6-8, 19-22] and is therefore potentially well adapted for QA biosynthesis.
Therefore in one embodiment, the host is a yeast. For such hosts, it may be desirable to introduce additional genes to improve the flux of QA production as described above. Examples may include one or more plant cytochrome P450 reductases (CPRs) to serve as the redox partner to the introduced P450s [6], as well as an HMGR.
Plants, which include a plant cell transformed as described above, form a further aspect of the invention.
If desired, following transformation of a plant cell, a plant may be regenerated, e.g. from single cells, callus tissue or leaf discs, as is standard in the art. Almost any plant can be entirely regenerated from cells, tissues and organs of the plant. Available techniques are reviewed in Vasil et al., Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol I, II and III, Laboratory Procedures and Their Applications, Academic Press, 1984, and Weissbach and Weissbach, Methods for Plant Molecular Biology, Academic Press, 1989.
In addition to the regenerated plant, the present invention embraces all of the following: a clone of such a plant, seed, selfed or hybrid progeny and descendants (e.g. F1 and F2 descendants). The invention also provides a plant propagule from such plants, that is any part which may be used in reproduction or propagation, sexual or asexual, including cuttings, seed and so on. It also provides any part of these plants, which in all cases include the plant cell or heterologous QA-biosynthesis modifying DNA described above.
The present invention also encompasses the expression product of any of the coding QA-biosynthesis modifying nucleic acid sequences disclosed and methods of making the expression product by expression from encoding nucleic acid therefore under suitable conditions, which may be in suitable host cells.
As described below, plant backgrounds such as those above may be natural or transgenic e.g. for one or more other genes relating to QA biosynthesis, or otherwise affecting that phenotype or trait.
In modifying the host phenotypes, the QA nucleic acids described herein may be used in combination with any other gene, such as transgenes affecting the rate or yield of QA, or its modification, or any other phenotypic trait or desirable property.
By use of a combination of genes, plants or microorganisms (e.g. bacteria, yeasts or fungi) can be tailored to enhance production of desirable precursors, or reduce undesirable metabolism.
As an alternative, down-regulation of genes in the host may be desired e.g. to reduce undesirable metabolism or fluxes which might impact on QA yield.
Such down regulation may be achieved by methods known in the art, for example using anti-sense technology.
In using anti-sense genes or partial gene sequences to down-regulate gene expression, a nucleotide sequence is placed under the control of a promoter in a “reverse orientation” such that transcription yields RNA which is complementary to normal mRNA transcribed from the “sense” strand of the target gene. See, for example, Rothstein et al, 1987; Smith et al,(1988) Nature 334, 724-726; Zhang et al,(1992) The Plant Cell 4, 1575-1588, English et al., (1996) The Plant Cell 8, 179-188. Antisense technology is also reviewed in Bourque, (1995), Plant Science 105, 125-149, and Flavell, (1994) PNAS USA 91, 3490-3496.
An alternative to anti-sense is to use a copy of all or part of the target gene inserted in sense, that is the same, orientation as the target gene, to achieve reduction in expression of the target gene by co-suppression. See, for example, van der Krol et al., (1990) The Plant Cell 2, 291-299; Napoli et al., (1990) The Plant Cell 2, 279-289; Zhang et al., (1992) The Plant Cell 4, 1575-1588, and US-A-5,231,020. Further refinements of the gene silencing or co-suppression technology may be found in WO95/34668 (Biosource); Angell & Baulcombe (1997) The EMBO Journal 16,12:3675-3684; and Voinnet & Baulcombe (1997) Nature 389: pg 553.
Double stranded RNA (dsRNA) has been found to be even more effective in gene silencing than both sense or antisense strands alone (Fire A. et al Nature, Vol 391, (1998)). dsRNA mediated silencing is gene specific and is often termed RNA interference (RNAi) (See also Fire (1999) Trends Genet. 15: 358-363, Sharp (2001) Genes Dev. 15: 485-490, Hammond et al. (2001) Nature Rev. Genes 2: 1110-1119 and Tuschl (2001) Chem. Biochem. 2: 239-245).
RNA interference is a two step process. First, dsRNA is cleaved within the cell to yield short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of about 21-23nt length with 5′ terminal phosphate and 3′ short overhangs (~2 nt) The siRNAs target the corresponding mRNA sequence specifically for destruction (Zamore P.D. Nature Structural Biology, 8, 9, 746-750, (2001)
Another methodology known in the art for down-regulation of target sequences is the use of “microRNA” (miRNA) e.g. as described by Schwab et al 2006, Plant Cell 18, 1121-1133. This technology employs artificial miRNAs, which may be encoded by stem loop precursors incorporating suitable oligonucleotide sequences, which sequences can be generated using well defined rules in the light of the disclosure herein.
The methods of the present invention embrace both the in vitro and in vivo production, or manipulation, of one or more QAs. For example, QA polypeptides may be employed in fermentation via expression in microorganisms such as e.g. E.coli, yeast and filamentous fungi and so on. In one embodiment, one or more newly characterised Qs QA sequences of the present invention may be used in these organisms in conjunction with one or more other biosynthetic genes.
In vivo methods are describe extensively above, and generally involve the step of causing or allowing the transcription of, and then translation from, a recombinant nucleic acid molecule encoding the QA polypeptides.
In other aspects of the invention, the QA polypeptides (enzymes) may be used in vitro, for example in isolated, purified, or semi-purified form. Optionally they may be the product of expression of a recombinant nucleic acid molecule.
As explained above QS-21 is a purified plant extract that enhances the ability of the immune system to respond to vaccine antigens.
QS-21 has utility as an immunologic adjuvant believed to enhance both humoral and cell-mediated immunity. QS-21 has been under clinical evaluation as an additive for various trial vaccines, including those for HIV, malaria and cancer. It is a component of the FDA-approved Shingrix shingles vaccine.
As noted above, in support of the present invention, the inventors have identified genes from Q. saponaria which are believed to encode polypeptides which affect QA biosynthesis (see SEQ. ID: Nos 1-8 in Table 1).
In certain aspects of the present invention, the QA nucleic acid is derived from Q. saponaria (SEQ. ID: Nos 1-8). Although it is believe that the key steps described herein for QA production (synthesis and oxidation of triterpenes) are likely to take place on the cytosolic face of the endoplasmic reticulum, such genes may be preferred, particularly for use in the preparation of stable transgenic plant hosts, since these native plant genes may be processed and function most effectively in the appropriate compartments of these hosts.
The above newly characterised QA biosynthetic genes from Q. saponaria. Thus form aspects of the present invention in their own right.
In a further aspect of the present invention there are disclosed nucleic acids which are variants of the QA nucleic acid is derived from Q. saponaria discussed above.
Such variants, as with the native QA genes discussed herein, may be used to alter the QA content of a plant, as assessed by the methods disclosed herein. For instance a variant nucleic acid may include a sequence encoding a variant QA polypeptide sharing the relevant biological activity of the native QA polypeptide, as discussed above. Examples include variants of any of SEQ ID Nos 2, 4, 6, or 8.
Described herein are methods of producing a derivative nucleic acid comprising the step of modifying any of the QA genes of the present invention disclosed above, particularly the QA sequences from Q. saponaria.
Changes may be desirable for a number of reasons. For instance they may introduce or remove restriction endonuclease sites or alter codon usage. This may be particularly desirable where the Qs genes are to be expressed in alternative hosts e.g. microbial hosts such as yeast. Methods of codon optimizing genes for this purpose are known in the art (see e.g. Elena, Claudia, et al. “Expression of codon optimized genes in microbial systems: current industrial applications and perspectives.” Frontiers in microbiology 5 (2014)). Thus sequences described herein including codon modifications to maximise yeast expression represent specific embodiments of the invention.
Alternatively changes to a sequence may produce a derivative by way of one or more (e.g. several) of addition, insertion, deletion or substitution of one or more nucleotides in the nucleic acid, leading to the addition, insertion, deletion or substitution of one or more (e.g. several) amino acids in the encoded polypeptide.
Such changes may modify sites which are required for post translation modification such as cleavage sites in the encoded polypeptide; motifs in the encoded polypeptide for phosphorylation etc. Leader or other targeting sequences (e.g. membrane or golgi locating sequences) may be added to the expressed protein to determine its location following expression if it is desired to isolate it from a microbial system.
Other desirable mutations may be random or site directed mutagenesis in order to alter the activity (e.g. specificity) or stability of the encoded polypeptide. Changes may be by way of conservative variation, i.e. substitution of one hydrophobic residue such as isoleucine, valine, leucine or methionine for another, or the substitution of one polar residue for another, such as arginine for lysine, glutamic for aspartic acid, or glutamine for asparagine. As is well known to those skilled in the art, altering the primary structure of a polypeptide by a conservative substitution may not significantly alter the activity of that peptide because the side-chain of the amino acid which is inserted into the sequence may be able to form similar bonds and contacts as the side chain of the amino acid which has been substituted out. This is so even when the substitution is in a region which is critical in determining the peptides conformation. Also included are variants having non-conservative substitutions. As is well known to those skilled in the art, substitutions to regions of a peptide which are not critical in determining its conformation may not greatly affect its activity because they do not greatly alter the peptide’s three dimensional structure. In regions which are critical in determining the peptides conformation or activity such changes may confer advantageous properties on the polypeptide. Indeed, changes such as those described above may confer slightly advantageous properties on the peptide e.g. altered stability or specificity.
The present invention may utilise fragments of the polypeptides encoding the QA genes of the present invention disclosed above, particularly the QA sequences from Q. saponaria.
Thus the present invention provides for the production and use of fragments of the full-length QA polypeptides of the invention disclosed herein, especially active portions thereof. An “active portion” of a polypeptide means a peptide which is less than said full length polypeptide, but which retains its essential biological activity.
A “fragment” of a polypeptide means a stretch of amino acid residues of at least about five to seven contiguous amino acids, often at least about seven to nine contiguous amino acids, typically at least about nine to 13 contiguous amino acids and, most preferably, at least about 20 to 30 or more contiguous amino acids. Fragments of the polypeptides may include one or more epitopes useful for raising antibodies to a portion of any of the amino acid sequences disclosed herein. Preferred epitopes are those to which antibodies are able to bind specifically, which may be taken to be binding a polypeptide or fragment thereof of the invention with an affinity which is at least about 1000x that of other polypeptides.
A specific fragment disclosed herein is the shorter isoform of CYP716-2012090, which is shown within in SEQ ID No 6 i.e. one which lacks the N-terminal 21 amino acids underlined in the sequence Annex.
For brevity, and of these QA sequences from Q. saponaria or variants (e.g. derivatives such as fragments thereof) may be referred to as “Qs QA sequences (or nucleic acid, or polypeptide)”. These Qs QA polypeptides, and nucleic acids encoding them, form one aspect of the invention.
It will be appreciated that where this term is used generally, it also applies to any of these sequences individually.
Thus in one aspect of the invention, there is disclosed isolated nucleic acid encoding any of these polypeptides (2, 4, 6, or 8). Preferably this may have the sequence of 1, 3, 5, or 7. Other nucleic acids of the invention include those which are degeneratively equivalent to these, or homologous variants (e.g. derivatives) of these.
Aspects of the invention further embrace isolated nucleic acid comprising a sequence which is complementary to any of those discussed hereinafter.
Use of a Qs QA sequence to catalyse its respective biological activity (as described in
Thus the invention further provides a method of influencing or affecting QA biosynthesis in a host such as a plant, the method including causing or allowing transcription of a heterologous Qs QA nucleic acid as discussed above within the cells of the plant. The step may be preceded by the earlier step of introduction of the Qs QA nucleic acid into a cell of the plant or an ancestor thereof.
Such methods will usually form a part of, possibly one step in, a method of producing a QA in a host such as a plant. Preferably the method will employ a QA modifying polypeptide of the present invention (e.g. in Table 1) or derivative thereof, as described above, or nucleic acid encoding either.
In a further embodiment, there are provided antibodies raised to a Qs QA polypeptides or peptides of the invention
Some aspects of the invention as it relates to heterologous reconstitution of the biosynthetic pathways discussed above will now be discussed in more detail.
“Nucleic acid” according to the present invention may include cDNA, RNA, genomic DNA and modified nucleic acids or nucleic acid analogs (e.g. peptide nucleic acid). Where a DNA sequence is specified, e.g. with reference to a figure, unless context requires otherwise the RNA equivalent, with U substituted for T where it occurs, is encompassed. Nucleic acid molecules according to the present invention may be provided isolated and/or purified from their natural environment, in substantially pure or homogeneous form, or free or substantially free of other nucleic acids of the species of origin, and double or single stranded. Where used herein, the term “isolated” encompasses all of these possibilities. The nucleic acid molecules may be wholly or partially synthetic. In particular they may be recombinant in that nucleic acid sequences which are not found together in nature (do not run contiguously) have been ligated or otherwise combined artificially. Nucleic acids may comprise, consist, or consist essentially of, any of the sequences discussed hereinafter.
The term “heterologous” is used broadly herein to indicate that the gene/sequence of nucleotides in question (e.g. encoding QA-biosynthesis modifying polypeptides) have been introduced into said cells of the host or an ancestor thereof, using genetic engineering, i.e. by human intervention. Nucleic acid heterologous to a host cell will be non-naturally occurring in cells of that type, variety or species. Thus the heterologous nucleic acid may comprise a coding sequence of or derived from a particular type of plant cell or species or variety of plant, placed within the context of a plant cell of a different type or species or variety of plant. A further possibility is for a nucleic acid sequence to be placed within a cell in which it or a homologue is found naturally, but wherein the nucleic acid sequence is linked and/or adjacent to nucleic acid which does not occur naturally within the cell, or cells of that type or species or variety of plant, such as operably linked to one or more regulatory sequences, such as a promoter sequence, for control of expression.
“Transformed” in this context means that the nucleotide sequences of the heterologous nucleic acid alter one or more of the cell’s characteristics and hence phenotype e.g. with respect to QA biosynthesis. Such transformation may be transient or stable.
“Unable to carry out QA biosynthesis” means that the host, prior to the conversion, does not, or is not believed to, naturally produce detectable or recoverable levels of QA under normal metabolic circumstances of that host.
The nucleotide sequence information provided herein may be used to design probes and primers for probing or amplification. An oligonucleotide for use in probing or PCR may be about 30 or fewer nucleotides in length (e.g. 18, 21 or 24). Generally specific primers are upwards of 14 nucleotides in length. For optimum specificity and cost effectiveness, primers of 16-24 nucleotides in length may be preferred. Those skilled in the art are well versed in the design of primers for use in processes such as PCR. If required, probing can be done with entire restriction fragments of the gene disclosed herein which may be 100′s or even 1000′s of nucleotides in length. Small variations may be introduced into the sequence to produce ‘consensus’ or ‘degenerate’ primers if required.
Probing may employ the standard Southern blotting technique. For instance DNA may be extracted from cells and digested with different restriction enzymes. Restriction fragments may then be separated by electrophoresis on an agarose gel, before denaturation and transfer to a nitrocellulose filter. Labelled probe may be hybridised to the single stranded DNA fragments on the filter and binding determined. DNA for probing may be prepared from RNA preparations from cells. Probing may optionally be done by means of so-called ‘nucleic acid chips’ (see Marshall & Hodgson (1998) Nature Biotechnology 16: 27-31, for a review).
In one embodiment, a variant encoding a QA-biosynthesis modifying polypeptide in accordance with the present invention is obtainable by means of a method which includes:
Preliminary experiments may be performed by hybridising under low stringency conditions. For probing, preferred conditions are those which are stringent enough for there to be a simple pattern with a small number of hybridisations identified as positive which can be investigated further.
For example, hybridizations may be performed, according to the method of Sambrook et al. (below) using a hybridization solution comprising: 5X SSC (wherein ‘SSC’ = 0.15 M sodium chloride; 0.15 M sodium citrate; pH 7), 5X Denhardt’s reagent, 0.5-1.0% SDS, 100 µg/ml denatured, fragmented salmon sperm DNA, 0.05% sodium pyrophosphate and up to 50% formamide. Hybridization is carried out at 37-42° C. for at least six hours. Following hybridization, filters are washed as follows: (1) 5 minutes at room temperature in 2X SSC and 1% SDS; (2) 15 minutes at room temperature in 2X SSC and 0.1% SDS; (3) 30 minutes - 1 hour at 37° C. in 1X SSC and 1% SDS; (4) 2 hours at 42-65° C. in 1X SSC and 1% SDS, changing the solution every 30 minutes.
One common formula for calculating the stringency conditions required to achieve hybridization between nucleic acid molecules of a specified sequence homology is (Sambrook et al., 1989): Tm = 81.5° C. + 16.6Log [Na+] + 0.41 (% G+C) - 0.63 (% formamide) - 600/#bp in duplex
As an illustration of the above formula, using [Na+] = [0.368] and 50-% formamide, with GC content of 42% and an average probe size of 200 bases, the Tm is 57° C. The Tm of a DNA duplex decreases by 1 - 1.5° C. with every 1% decrease in homology. Thus, targets with greater than about 75% sequence identity would be observed using a hybridization temperature of 42° C. Such a sequence would be considered substantially homologous to the nucleic acid sequence of the present invention.
It is well known in the art to increase stringency of hybridisation gradually until only a few positive clones remain. Other suitable conditions include, e.g. for detection of sequences that are about 80-90% identical, hybridization overnight at 42° C. in 0.25 M Na2HPO4, pH 7.2, 6.5% SDS, 10% dextran sulfate and a final wash at 55° C. in 0.1X SSC, 0.1% SDS. For detection of sequences that are greater than about 90% identical, suitable conditions include hybridization overnight at 65° C. in 0.25 M Na2HPO4, pH 7.2, 6.5% SDS, 10% dextran sulfate and a final wash at 60° C. in 0.1X SSC, 0.1% SDS.
In a further embodiment, hybridization of a nucleic acid molecule to a variant may be determined or identified indirectly, e.g. using a nucleic acid amplification reaction, particularly the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR requires the use of two primers to specifically amplify target nucleic acid, so preferably two nucleic acid molecules with sequences characteristic of a QA gene of the present invention are employed. Using RACE PCR, only one such primer may be needed (see “PCR protocols; A Guide to Methods and Applications”, Eds. Innis et al, Academic Press, New York, (1990)).
Thus a method involving use of PCR in obtaining nucleic acid according to the present invention may include:
In all cases above, if need be, clones or fragments identified in the search can be extended. For instance if it is suspected that they are incomplete, the original DNA source (e.g. a clone library, mRNA preparation etc.) can be revisited to isolate missing portions e.g. using sequences, probes or primers based on that portion which has already been obtained to identify other clones containing overlapping sequence.
Purified protein according to the present invention, or a fragment, mutant, derivative or variant thereof, e.g. produced recombinantly by expression from encoding nucleic acid therefor, may be used to raise antibodies employing techniques which are standard in the art. Antibodies and polypeptides comprising antigen-binding fragments of antibodies may be used in identifying homologues from other species as discussed further below.
Methods of producing antibodies include immunising a mammal (e.g. human, mouse, rat, rabbit, horse, goat, sheep or monkey) with the protein or a fragment thereof. Antibodies may be obtained from immunised animals using any of a variety of techniques known in the art, and might be screened, preferably using binding of antibody to antigen of interest. For instance, Western blotting techniques or immunoprecipitation may be used (Armitage et al, 1992, Nature 357: 80-82). Antibodies may be polyclonal or monoclonal.
As an alternative or supplement to immunising a mammal, antibodies with appropriate binding specificity may be obtained from a recombinantly produced library of expressed immunoglobulin variable domains, e.g. using lambda bacteriophage or filamentous bacteriophage which display functional immunoglobulin binding domains on their surfaces; for instance see WO92/01047.
Antibodies raised to a polypeptide or peptide can be used in the identification and/or isolation of homologous polypeptides, and then the encoding genes.
Antibodies may be modified in a number of ways. Indeed the term “antibody” should be construed as covering any specific binding substance having a binding domain with the required specificity. Thus, this term covers antibody fragments, derivatives, functional equivalents and homologues of antibodies, including any polypeptide comprising an immunoglobulin binding domain, whether natural or synthetic.
A number of patents and publications are cited herein in order to more fully describe and disclose the invention and the state of the art to which the invention pertains. Each of these references is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety into the present disclosure, to the same extent as if each individual reference was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
Throughout this specification, including the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise,” and variations such as “comprises” and “comprising,” will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integers or steps.
It must be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a pharmaceutical carrier” includes mixtures of two or more such carriers, and the like.
Ranges are often expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by the use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment.
Any sub-titles herein are included for convenience only, and are not to be construed as limiting the disclosure in any way.
The invention will now be further described with reference to the following non-limiting Figures and Examples. Other embodiments of the invention will occur to those skilled in the art in the light of these.
The disclosure of all references cited herein, inasmuch as it may be used by those skilled in the art to carry out the invention, is hereby specifically incorporated herein by cross-reference.
The CAD chromatogram is shown at the top. Mass spectra (negative mode) of interest are shown below.
A common ion with m/z 485 (shown in red) was common to both the quillaic acid standard and novel peak in tHMGR/QsbAS/CYP716-2073932/CYP716-2012090/CYP94D65 samples. This ion fits the expected molecular mass of quillaic acid (minus H+). *A second compound was found in high abundance with m/z 487 that was putatively identified as cauphyllogenin (featuring a C-23 alcohol instead of an aldehyde as seen in quillaic acid). Mass spectra for these products are shown in
Fewer alternative C-23-oxidised side products, including the C-23 alcohol (cauphylogenin) and acid (16α-hydroxy-gypsogenic acid (16OH-GA)) were found in the Q. saponaria C-23-expressing sample, suggesting greater specificity for production of the aldehyde.
Recently, a transcriptomic dataset from Q. saponaria was made available through the 1KP project [1]. This dataset is derived from HiSeq sequencing (Illumina) of Q. saponaria leaf tissue.
Although commercial sources of QS-21 are usually derived from bark, the leaf tissue has also been shown to be a substantial source of QS-21 and other saponins [2], so we reasoned the relevant biosynthetic genes might be present in this database. The transcriptome dataset was mined for potential biosynthetic genes.
The first candidate searched for was the β-amyrin synthase (bAS) OSC. Numerous bAS enzymes are characterised, including from related Fabales species.
A bAS enzyme from Glycyrrhiza glabra (Genbank ID Q9MB42.1) was used as a query to identify OSC sequences. This returned a single full-length sequence (OQHZ-2074321) predicted to be a triterpene synthase (henceforth referred to as QsbAS).
Other partial OSC sequences were also identified in this dataset, however these were predicted to be sterol (cycloartenol) synthases and were discounted.
The full nucleotide and predicted protein sequence of QsbAS are given as SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 2 in Sequence Appendix A.
We surmised that a likely class of enzymes responsible for oxidation of β-amyrin would be cytochrome P450s (P450s). These enzymes are encoded by very large gene superfamilies with usually more than 200 representatives in a single plant genome.
Although function is often difficult to predict based on sequence homology, in recent years, the CYP716 family has emerged as a preeminent family of triterpene oxidases [3]. Previously 11 CYP716s had been characterised as β-amyrin C-28 oxidases (Sequence Appendix B). These P450s were isolated from taxonomically distinct species, (including Fabales species), suggesting that the C-28 β-amyrin oxidase in Q. saponaria may possibly be catalysed by a member of this family.
Furthermore CYP716 enzymes have also been shown to be capable of catalysing oxidation at other (non-C-28) positions around the β-amyrin scaffold, including one C-16α oxidase (CYP716Y1), from Bupleurum falcatum (Sequence Appendix B). Two full-length CYP716s were identified in the transcriptome dataset, using the Medicago truncatula C-28 oxidase CYP716A12 as a search query. These are OQHZ-2073932 and OQHZ-2012090 (which may be referred to herein as CYP716-2073932 and CYP716-2012090).
(Note that CYP716-2073932 has also been formally designated CYP716A224 by the P450 nomenclature committee [3]). The full nucleotide and predicted protein sequence of these CYP716s are given in as SEQ ID NOs: 3 and 4 in Sequence Appendix A.
Q. saponaria trees were sourced from a nursery (Burncoose Nurseries, Cornwall) within the UK. RNA was extracted from the leaves and roots of a single tree using a Qiagen RNeasy Plant RNA extraction kit, with a modified protocol as detailed by [26]. This RNA was further used as a template for cDNA synthesis using Superscript III (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions..
For amplification of target genes, primers were designed for each of the four genes described above (SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, and 7). For CYP716-2012090, two sets of primers were designed allowing cloning of both long and short isoforms of the protein, differing at the N-terminus by 21 amino acids. This was due to poor alignment of this region with other characterised CYP716s.
Each of the primers incorporated attB adapters at the 5′ end to allow directional Gateway®-based cloning. These adapters are shown in italics at the 5′ end, with the gene-specific sequences following in the 5′ -> 3′ direction.
Two PCR reactions were performed for each gene, utilising either leaf or root cDNA as a template. As described above, two sets of PCRs were setup for CYP716-2012090 separate reactions, utilising different forward primers. PCRs were performed in a total volume of 50 µL using iProof (BioRad) with HF buffer according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For amplification of QsbAS and CYP716 enzymes, PCR thermal cycling involved an initial denaturation step at 98° C. (30 sec), followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (98° C., 10 sec), annealing (50° C., 10 sec) and extension (72° C., 3 min), with a final extension at 72° C. (5 mins). These parameters were identical for amplification of the CYP714, except that the extension time during the 30 cycles was reduced to 2 mins.
Successful amplification of all genes was observed using the cDNA from both root and leaf tissues as a PCR template (
Transient expression of the various cloned genes was performed in N. benthamiana. All combinations included coinfiltration of a strain carrying a feedback-insensitive truncated form of the A. strigosa HMG-CoA reductase (tHMGR). This enzyme has been demonstrated to increase triterpene content upon transient expression in N. benthamiana [5]. The sequences utilised are shown as SEQ ID Nos 29-32.
Leaves were harvested, extracted and analysed by GC-MS as described previously [5]. GC-MS analysis of QsbAS-expressing leaves revealed the presence of compound identified as β-amyrin by comparison of the retention time and mass spectra of a β-amyrin standard (
Next, QsbAS was tested with combinations of the various P450s. This revealed that both of the CYP716 enzymes showed activity towards β-amyrin. The CYP716-2073932 was found to be the C-28 oxidase and converted most of the β-amyrin to oleanolic acid. CYP716-2012090 converted a small amount of β-amyrin to a product putatively identified as 16α-hydroxy-β-amyrin (based on comparison to previously published mass spectra [6, 7] (
When these two CYP716 enzymes were combined, a third product was identified with an identical retention time and mass spectrum to echinocystic acid, an intermediate to quillaic acid consisting of β-amyrin plus the C-28 carboxylic acid and C-16α alcohol (
Following the discovery of the C-28 and C-16α oxidases, attention was focussed on the outstanding Q. saponaria C-23 oxidase. The identification of the C-28 and C-16α oxidases was facilitated by homology-based searches of known triterpene-oxidising P450s. Other candidates were considered based on homology to known triterpene oxidases, including two CYP72 family members (OQHZ-2012357 and OQHZ-2019977), for which a C-23 oxidase has been identified in the related Fabaceae species Medicago truncatula. However upon cloning and testing in planta neither of these candidates displayed obvious activity towards β-amyrin, or its C-28/C-16α oxidised derivatives (data not shown).
Consequently, it was deduced that the outstanding Q. saponaria C-23 oxidase may be within a P450 family not previously implicated in triterpene oxidation.
The 1KP transcriptome data was therefore searched for all putative cytochrome P450s.
Approximately 150 P450-encoding contigs were found in the dataset. Out of these, 35 appeared to encode a full-length enzyme (approx. 1500 bp, see Table 5).
Q. saponaria C23 oxidase 1KP: OHQZ- 2018687
Q. saponaria C28 oxidase (CYP716-2073932)
Q. saponaria C16α oxidase CYP716- 2012090
Amongst these full-length contigs were the C-28 and C-16α oxidases described above. It was therefore reasoned that the outstanding C-23 oxidase might also be represented within these sequences.
The 35 P450 candidates were further assigned putative clan and families based on their homology to named P450s from other species (Table 5). A number of the candidates were anticipated to be involved in primary metabolism (and shared a high degree of sequence conservation to enzymes from unrelated species such as Arabidopsis), and were subsequently eliminated from the list.
This gave a final list of 25 candidates, for which cloning primers were ordered. For easy reference, these are numbered 1-25 in Table 5 and described herein using these numbers.
PCR amplification of the 25 candidates was next attempted. As with the previous candidates, two PCRs were performed for each candidate using cDNA templates derived from both leaf (L) and root (R) respectively. Strong PCR products were successfully produced for 20 out of the 25 candidates (data not shown). These were subsequently purified (from the leaf cDNA template samples) and cloned into the Gateway® Entry vector pDONR207.
Candidates were sequenced to verify the correct gene had been cloned. In most cases the cloned sequences closely matched the anticipated sequence. Some redundancy was found amongst the clones; the sequences of #6 and #7 were found to be identical, as were #16 and #17. Upon checking the predicted sequence in the original transcriptomic data, it was realised that the contigs for these pairs were highly similar and primers had not been designed to distinguish between them. Regardless, the clones were treated as separate and cloned into the pEAQ-HT-DEST1 binary vector before transformation in A. tumefaciens.
The 15 candidates were next transiently expressed in N. benthamiana. The candidates were first assessed for their potential to oxidise β-amyrin by coexpression with the Q. saponaria β-amyrin synthase (QsbAS). No new products were detected in these samples by GC-MS analysis. Candidates were therefore further assessed for their ability to oxidise oleanolic acid, by coexpression with QsbAS and the C-28 oxidase (CYP716-2073932). This time, a distinct new product could be detected in extracts of leaves expressing candidates #6 and #7 (6 and 7 encode the same enzyme, as described above). The new products had identical retention times and mass spectra to a standard of 23-hydroxy-oleanolic acid (aka hederagenin). The enzyme encoded by candidate #7 is expected to be a CYP714 family member (yet to be formally named). Before the presently claimed priority date is it believed that no members of this family had been reported to be triterpene oxidases. Since the priority date other examples have been reported (see e.g. Kim et. al (2018). “A Novel Multifunctional C-23 Oxidase, CYP714E19, Is Involved in Asiaticoside Biosynthesis”. Plant Cell Physiol.) 1200-1213.
The sequences are included in Appendix A as SEQ ID Nos 7 and 8.
As the C-23 candidates were derived from our own assembly of this data, the corresponding sequence in the 1KP dataset were searched for by BLASTn (https://db.cngb.org/blast4onekp/). Surprisingly, #7 is not represented by a full-length sequence in this database but several smaller contigs are returned (Table 6). The top hit from these is OHQZ-2018687, an 821 bp contig.
The β-amyrin synthase and C-28, C-16α and C-23 oxidases from Q. saponaria described above should be sufficient for production of quillaic acid when expressed together (see
Prior to testing the C-23 oxidase from Q. saponaria, the other candidate genes from Q. saponaria were combined withC-23 β-amyrin oxidases characterised from other species i.e. CYP72A68v2 from M. truncatula (barrel medic) and CYP94D65 from Avena strigosa (black oat) (SEQ ID Nos 13-16).
In this first experiment, the QsbAS and two CYP716 enzymes from Q. saponaria were combined with the M. truncatula and A. strigosa C-23 oxidases using transient expression in N. benthamiana to determine whether quillaic acid could be observed in these samples. LC-MS-CAD analysis revealed that both sets of combinations
The abundance of quillaic acid appeared to be highest in the sample expressing CYP72A68v2.
Other related products were also observed in these samples: In the combination expressing the oat C-23 oxidase (CYP94D65), the most abundant new peak was identified as cauphyllogenin (C-23 alcohol instead of the aldehyde seen in quillaic acid), while the Medicago C-23 oxidase (CYP72A68v2) gave rise to substantial accumulation of 16α-hydroxy gypsogenin (C-23 carboxyllic acid instead of the aldehyde seen in quillaic acid).
To verify that quillaic acid could be produced in N. benthamiana with the exclusive use of the Q. saponaria enzymes, the QsbAS enzyme was transiently expressed with various combinations of the P450s. As expected, analysis of leaves coexpressing QsbAS with all P450s resulted in appearance of a peak which matched the retention time and mass spectrum of a quillaic acid standard. This peak was absent in samples from leaves expressing any less than the full pathway (
Furthermore, a comparison was made between the present sample expressing the full Q. saponaria complement of enzymes, versus the equivalent (stored) samples where C-23 oxidases from M. truncatula and oat had been used. This revealed that the amount of quillaic acid appeared to be highest in the sample expressing the Q. saponaria C-23 oxidase (
Saccharomyces cerevisiae may be utilised as a host chassis for commercial QA production.
We therefore demonstrated cloned Quillaja genes are active in this host. A strain of S. cerevisiae derived from S288C (Genotype: MATa/MATα; ura3Δ0/ura3Δ0; leu2Δ0/leu2Δ0; his3Δ1/his3Δ1; met15Δ0/MET15; LYS2/lys2Δ0; YHR072w/YHR072w::kanM) was used which contains three auxotrophic selection markers (-URA/-HIS/-LEU) allowing for expression of genes from up to three plasmids.
Three Gateway-compatible yeast expression vectors were employed, including pYES-DEST52 (uracil selection), pAG423 (histidine selection) and pAG435 (leucine selection).
The Q. saponaria enzymes were recombined into these vectors as described in Table 7. Briefly, the β-amyrin synthase (QsbAS) was recombined into the pYES-DEST52 vector, while the C-28 oxidase (CYP716-2073932) and C-16α oxidase (both long (L) and short (S) isoforms) were recombined into pAG423.
To enhance the efficiency of functioning of the cytochrome P450s, the third plasmid (pAG435) was used to express the Arabidopsis thaliana cytochrome P450 reductase 2 (AtATR2) enzyme. This serves as a coenzyme for reducing plant P450s back to an active state following substrate oxidation. All vectors contain galactose-inducible promoters for expression of the inserted genes.
The yeast strains were cultured in synthetic yeast media with galactose and incubated for 2 days at 30° C. Strains were pelleted by centrifugation, saponified and metabolites were extracted with ethyl acetate. GC-MS analysis revealed that all strains accumulated a peak at 10.6 minutes which was identified as β-amyrin (
The above data demonstrates that yeast can be engineered to produce quillaic acid precursors..
Triterpenes have previously been produced using engineered transgenic plant lines (e.g. Arabidopsis, Wheat). A series of Golden Gate [23] vectors which allow for construction of multigene vectors and allow integration of an entire pathway into a single locus have been reported. These can be applied analogously to the present invention, in the light of the disclosure herein.
Quillaic acid is a triterpenoid and a key precursor to the saponin QS-21 produced by Quillaja saponaria.
Here, four enzymes (a β-amyrin synthase and C-16α, C-23 and C-28 oxidases) from Q. saponaria were identified which were capable of production of quillaic acid when transiently expressed in NicotiaN. benthamiana.. These enzymes are predicted to be involved in the early steps of the QS-21 biosynthetic pathway, required for generation of the quillaic acid scaffold (
The identity of the products described herein were validated through use of authentic standards, giving a high degree of confidence in these results.
The activity of the β-amyrin synthase (QsbAS) and three cytochrome P450 monoxygenases which oxidise β-amyrin at the C-28, C-23 and C-16α positions (referred to herein as CYP716-2073932, CYP714-7 and CYP716-2012090, respectively) in the biosynthesis of quillaic acid is shown schematically in
To estimate quillaic acid production in N. benthamiana following transient expression, an analysis was carried out by LC-CAD. Agroinfiltration was performed as previously described using the Q. saponaria β-amyrin synthase and C-16α, C-23 and C-28 oxidases. As a control, leaves infiltrated with only two (C-23 and C-28) oxidases were used and accumulate gypsogenin instead of quillaic acid (
The oat HMG-CoA reductase (tHMGR) was also included in all infiltrations as it increases production of β-amyrin. Representative chromatograms from these samples are shown in
To estimate production of quillaic acid in these leaves, the area of the quillaic acid peak was compared to that of the internal standard (included at 1.1 mg/g dry leaf weight). The average value from the three replicates was found to be 1.44 mg/g.
To determine unambiguously that quillaic acid production had been achieved in N. benthamiana, purification of the product was undertaken.
A total of 209 N. benthamiana plants were vacuum infiltrated with A. tumefaciens carrying the pEAQ-HT-DEST1 constructs harbouring the Q. saponaria β-amyrin synthase, C-16α, C-23 and C-28 oxidases. The oat tHMGR was also included to boost yields. Leaves were harvested four days after infiltration yielding 150.3 g dry material after lyophilisation. Metabolites were extracted with ethanol using a Büchi Speed Extractor E-914 and several rounds of silica gel flash chromatography was used to isolate a total of 30 mg of product. The isolated product was found to have an identical retention time and mass spectrum to that of an authentic quillaic acid standard (Extrasynthese) by LC-MS (
This confirms that quillaic acid can be produced through transient expression in N. benthamiana through transient expression of the Q. saponaria enzymes. The isolated yield of the product was in the region of 0.2 mg/g dry weight, although some minor impurities were detected in the sample. This yield is lower than the estimated yield from LC-CAD in Example 9, indicating losses of the product during this isolation process. Nevertheless this demonstrates that practical quantities of quillaic acid can be produced and isolated from N. benthamiana using the presently characterised enzymes.
Agroinfiltration was performed using a needleless syringe as previously described (Reed et al., 2017). All genes were expressed from pEAQ-HT-DEST1 binary expression vectors (Sainsbury et al., 2009) in A. tumefaciens LBA4404. All plants co-expressed the oat tHMGR, the Quillaja β-amyrin synthase (QsbAS), and β-amyrin C-28 (CYP716-2073932) and C-16α (CYP716-2012090S) oxidases. For quillaic acid production the C-23 (CYP714-7) oxidase was also co-expressed while green fluorescent protein (GFP) was used instead for controls. Cultivation of bacteria and plants is as described in (Reed et al., 2017). Three plants were infiltrated per test condition and analysed separately as biological replicates.
Leaves were harvested 5 days after agroinfiltration and freeze-dried. Freeze-dried leaf material (10 mg per sample) was ground at 1000 rpm for 1 min (Geno/Grinder 2010, Spex SamplePrep). Extractions were carried out in 550 µL 80% methanol with 20 µg/mL of digitoxin (internal standard; Sigma) for 20 min at 40° C., with shaking at 1400 rpm (Thermomixer Comfort, Eppendorf). The sample was partitioned twice with 400 µL hexane. The aqueous phase was dried under vacuum at 40° C. (EZ-2 Series Evaporator, Genevac). Dried material was resuspended in 75 µL of 100% methanol and filtered at 12, 500 g for 30 sec (0.2 µm, Spin-X, Costar). Filtered samples were transferred to glass vials and analysed as detailed below.
Analysis was carried out using a Prominence HPLC system with single quadrupole mass spectrometer LCMS-2020 (Shimadzu) and Corona Veo RS Charged Aerosol Detector (CAD) (Dionex). Detection: MS (dual ESI/APCI ionization, DL temp 250° C., neb gas flow 15 L.min-1, heat block temp 400° C., spray voltage Pos 4.5 kV, Neg -3.5 kV) CAD: data collection rate 10 Hz, filter constant 3.6 s, 925 evaporator temp. 35° C., ion trap voltage 20.5 V. Method: Solvent A: [H2O + 0.1 % formic acid] Solvent B: [acetonitrile (CH3CN) + 0.1% formic acid. Injection volume: 10 µL. Gradient: 15% [B] from 0 to 1.5 min, 15% to 60% [B] from 1.5 to 26 min, 60% to 100% [B] from 26 to 26.5 min, 100% [B] from 26.5 to 28.5 min, 100% to 15% [B] from 28.5 to 29 min, 35% [B] from 29 to 30 min. Method was performed using a flow rate of 0.3 mL.min-1 and a Kinetex column 2.6 µm XB-C18 100 Å, 50 × 2.1 mm (Phenomenex).
Analysis was performed using LabSolutions software (Shimadzu). To provide an estimate of product yields, the area of the peak for quillaic acid (as determined by CAD) was divided by that of the internal standard (digitoxin, 1.1 µg/mg dry leaf tissue). Results were averaged from the three replicates. A minor peak for an endogenous N. benthamiana product with the same retention time as quillaic acid was observed in controls (calculated average 0.25 µg/mg). Therefore his value was subtracted from the estimated quillaic acid yield.
Agroinfiltration was carried out as detailed above using tHMGR, QsbAS, CYP716-2073932, CYP716-2012090S and CYP714-7 oxidases. A total of 209 plants were infiltrated by vacuum as previously described (Reed et al., 2017) and were harvested after four days.
Leaves from the large scale infiltration were harvested, lyophilised and extraction was performed using a SpeedExtractor E-914 (Büchi) as detailed in (Reed et al., 2017) with the exception that the program involved four cycles (100° C. and 130 bar pressure). Cycle one (hexane) had zero hold time, and cycles two to four (ethanol) had 5 min hold times. The run finished with a 2 min solvent flush and 6 min N2 flush. The hexane portion of the extraction was discarded and the ethanol portion was used for subsequent flash chromatography, performed using an Isolera One (Biotage) with details of individual columns given below. Fractions were checked for quillaic acid after each column by GC-MS and thin layer chromatography (TLC) as detailed in (Reed et al., 2017). At each stage, the purest fractions were pooled and dried onto silica gel 60 (Material Harvest) for loading onto the subsequent column. Column 1: SNAP Ultra 50 g (Biotage), flow rate: 100 mL/min, 90 mL fractions with the following gradient: Solvent A: [hexane] Solvent B: [ethyl acetate]; gradients: 5% [B] to 100% [B] over 10 column volumes, and held at 100% [B] for a further 5 column volumes. Column 2: SNAP Ultra 50 g column (Biotage), flow rate 100 mL/min, 90 mL fractions with the following gradient: Solvent A: [dichloromethane] Solvent B: [ethyl acetate]; 10% [B] to 60% [B] over 10 column volumes, and held at 100% [B] for a further 2 column volumes. Column 3: SNAP Ultra 10 g (Biotage), flow rate: 36 mL/min, 17 mL fractions with same gradient as column 2. Following column 3 the fractions were treated with activated charcoal to remove coloured impurities and loaded onto column 4. Column 4: SNAP Ultra 10 g column (Biotage) (36 mL/min, 17 mL fractions) with an isocratic mobile phase 15% ethyl acetate in dichloromethane over 20 column volumes. The pooled fractions were treated with a small amount of HCl (400 µL of conc HCl in ~40 mL ethanol) which helped to reduce streaking on the TLC plate. Column 5: SNAP Ultra 10 g column (Biotage) (36 mL/min, 17 mL fractions) with an isocratic mobile phase 15% ethyl acetate in dichloromethane over 30 column volumes with a final flush of 100% ethyl acetate over 5 column volumes. The purest fractions were pooled and dried to yield a 30 mg of a white powder with small amounts of yellow impurities. This was analysed by GC-MS, LC-MS and NMR as below.
GC-MS analysis was performed as described in (Reed et al., 2017). LC-MS analysis was performed as described above for quillaic acid quantification. NMR spectra were recorded in Fourier transform mode at a nominal frequency of 400 MHz for 1H NMR in deuterated methanol. For each method of analysis a quillaic acid standard (Extrasynthese) was used for comparison.
Reed J, Stephenson MJ, Miettinen K, Brouwer B, Leveau A, Brett P, Goss RJM, Goossens A, O′Connell MA, Osbourn A. 2017. A translational synthetic biology platform for rapid access to gram-scale quantities of novel drug-like molecules. Metab Eng 42: 185-193.
Sainsbury F, Thuenemann EC, Lomonossoff GP. 2009. pEAQ: versatile expression vectors for easy and quick transient expression of heterologous proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol J 7(7): 682-693.
1. Johnson, M.T.J., et al., Evaluating Methods for Isolating Total RNA and Predicting the Success of Sequencing Phylogenetically Diverse Plant Transcriptomes. PLOS ONE, 2012. 7(11): p. e50226.
2. Schlotterbeck, T., et al., The Use of Leaves from Young Trees of Quillaja saponaria (Molina) Plantations as a New Source of Saponins. Economic Botany, 2015. 69(3): p. 262-272.
3. Miettinen, K., et al., The ancient CYP716 family is a major contributor to the diversification of eudicot triterpenoid biosynthesis. Nat Commun, 2017. 8: p. 14153.
4. Sainsbury, F., E.C. Thuenemann, and G.P. Lomonossoff, pEAQ: versatile expression vectors for easy and quick transient expression of heterologous proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol J, 2009. 7(7): p. 682-93.
5. Reed, J., et al., A translational synthetic biology platform for rapid access to gram-scale quantities of novel drug-like molecules. Metab Eng, 2017.
6. Moses, T., et al., Combinatorial biosynthesis of sapogenins and saponins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a C-16α hydroxylase from Bupleurum falcatum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014. 111(4): p. 1634-39.
7. Moses, T., et al., Unravelling the Triterpenoid Saponin Biosynthesis of the African Shrub Maesa lanceolata. Mol Plant, 2014. 8: p. 122-35.
8. Fukushima, E.O., et al., Combinatorial biosynthesis of legume natural and rare triterpenoids in engineered yeast. Plant Cell Physiol, 2013. 54(5): p. 740-9.
9. Fukushima, E.O., et al., CYP716A subfamily members are multifunctional oxidases in triterpenoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol, 2011. 52(12): p. 2050-61.
10. Carelli, M., et al., Medicago truncatula CYP716A12 is a multifunctional oxidase involved in the biosynthesis of hemolytic saponins. Plant Cell, 2011. 23(8): p. 3070-81.
11. Han, J.Y., et al., The involvement of β-amyrin 28-oxidase (CYP716A52v2) in oleanane-type ginsenoside biosynthesis in Panax ginseng. Plant Cell Physiol, 2013. 54(12): p. 2034-46.
12. Fiallos-Jurado, J., et al., Saponin determination, expression analysis and functional characterization of saponin biosynthetic genes in Chenopodium quinoa leaves. Plant Sci, 2016. 250: p. 188-97.
13. Khakimov, B., et al., Identification and genome organization of saponin pathway genes from a wild crucifer, and their use for transient production of saponins in NicotiaN. benthamiana. Plant J, 2015. 84(3): p. 478-90.
14. Andre, C.M., et al., Multifunctional oxidosqualene cyclases and cytochrome P450 involved in the biosynthesis of apple fruit triterpenic acids. New Phytol, 2016. 211(4): p. 1279-94.
15. Huang, L., et al., Molecular characterization of the pentacyclic triterpenoid biosynthetic pathway in Catharanthus roseus. Planta, 2012. 236(5): p. 1571-81.
16. Xu, G., et al., A novel glucuronosyltransferase has an unprecedented ability to catalyse continuous two-step glucuronosylation of glycyrrhetinic acid to yield glycyrrhizin. New Phytologist, 2016. 212(1): p. 123-135.
17. Shibuya, M., et al., Identification and characterization of glycosyltransferases involved in the biosynthesis of soyasaponin I in Glycine max. FEBS Lett, 2010. 584(11): p. 2258-64.
18. Wang, P., et al., Synthesis of the potent immunostimulatory adjuvant QS-21A. J Am Chem Soc, 2005. 127(10): p. 3256-7.
19. Moses, T., et al., Comparative analysis of CYP93E proteins for improved microbial synthesis of plant triterpenoids. Phytochemistry, 2014. 108: p. 47-56.
20. Dai, Z., et al., Producing aglycons of ginsenosides in bakers’ yeast. Sci Rep, 2014. 4: p. 3698.
21. Dai, Z., et al., Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of ginsenosides. Metab Eng, 2013. 20(0): p. 146-56.
22. Salmon, M., et al., A conserved amino acid residue critical for product and substrate specificity in plant triterpene synthases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2016. 113(30): p. E4407-14.
23. Engler, C., et al., A golden gate modular cloning toolbox for plants. ACS Synth Biol, 2014. 3(11): p. 839-43.
24. Mugford, S.T., et al., Modularity of plant metabolic gene clusters: a trio of linked genes that are collectively required for acylation of triterpenes in oat. Plant Cell, 2013. 25(3): p. 1078-92.
25. Paddon, C.J., et al., High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature, 2013. 496(7446): p. 528-32.
26. MacKenzie, D.J., et al., Improved RNA Extraction from Woody Plants for the Detection of Viral Pathogens by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction. Plant Disease, 1997. 81(2): p. 222-226.
27. Sainsbury, F. and G.P. Lomonossoff, Transient expressions of synthetic biology in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2014. 19(0): p. 1-7.
Q. saponaria sequences Clone number refers to the contig number from the original 1KP transcriptome assembly (https://db.cngb.org/blast4onekp/)
Q. saponaria β-amyrin synthase, QsbAS1
Q. saponaria β-amyrin - C-28 oxidase
Q. saponaria β-amyrin/oleanolic acid C-16α oxidase
Q. saponaria oleanolic acid C-23 oxidase
Cytochrome P450s which oxidise β-amyrin (or derivatives thereof) at the relevant positions (16α, 28, 23) found in quillaic acid. Enzymes named in bold have been tested by transient expression in N. benthamiana and found to generate products consistent with those reported by the referenced studies.
Initials preceding gene name are species as follows: As - Avena strigosa, At - Arabidopsis thaliana, Bf - Bupleurum falcatum, Bv - Barbarea vulgaris, Cq - Chenopodium quinoa, Cr -Catharanthus roseus, Md - Malus domestica, Ml - Maesa lanceolata, Mt - Medicago truncatula, Pg - Panax ginseng, Vv - Vitis vinifera.
Pairwise alignments of the 18 P450s were made using Clustal Omega (version 1.2.4 - accessed through https://www.ebi.ac.uk). Numbers in the table represent percentage amino acid identity between genes. Sequences are organised according to function and the Q. saponaria genes characterised herein are given in bold. All pairwise values are represented twice, therefore redundant sequences are shown in the upper right of the table with a grey background. The Table is split across two pages for ease of presentation.
ATGGCTGTGGAGGTTCACCGCCGGGCTCCCGCGCCCCATGGCCGGGGCAC
CGGGGAGAAGGGCCGCGTGCAGGCCGGGGACGCGCTGCCGCTGCCGATCC
GCCACACCAACCTCATCTTCTCGGCGCTCTTCGCCGCCTCCCTCGCATAC
CTCATGCGCCGCTGGAGGGAGAAGATCCGCAACTCCACGCCGCTCCACGT
CGTGGGGCTCACCGAGATCTTCGCCATCTGCGGCCTCGTCGCCTCCCTCA
TCTACCTCCTCAGCTTCTTCGGCATCGCCTTCGTGCAGTCCGTCGTATCC
AACAGCGACGACGAGGACGAGGACTTCCTCATCGCGGCTGCAGCATCCCA
GGCCCCCCCGCCGCCCTCCTCCAAGCCCGCGCCGCAGCAGTGCGCCCTGC
TGCAGAGCGCCGGAGTCGCGCCCGAGAAAATGCCCGAGGAGGACGAGGAA
MAVEVHRRAPAPHGRGTGEKGRVQAGDALPLPIRHTNLIFSALFAASLAY
LMRRWREKIRNSTPLHVVGLTEIFAICGLVASLIYLLSFFGIAFVQSVVS
NSDDEDEDFLIAAAASQAPPPPSSKPAPQQCALLQSAGVAPEKMPEEDEE
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1721600.3 | Dec 2017 | GB | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2018/086430 | 12/20/2018 | WO |
