Metal pad for downhole formation testing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6658930
  • Patent Number
    6,658,930
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 4, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 9, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
Methods and apparatus for isolator pad assemblies used in formation testing equipment. The pad comprises a primarily metallic pad member and a retractable resilient sealing member. The resilient sealing member is maintained in a retracted, protected position until extended to seal against the wellbore. When extended the metallic pad pushes into the mudcake until a raised ring of material on the surface of the pad contacts the formation. Once the pad is in place, the resilient sealing member, which is molded to an extending metal sleeve, is extended and contacts the mudcake to form a primary seal. With the primary and secondary seals energized, a fluid sample can be collected from the formation without contamination from wellbore fluids.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to downhole tools used to acquire and test a sample of fluid from a formation. More particularly, this invention relates to a sealing arrangement that creates a seal between a sample probe and a formation in order to isolate the probe from wellbore fluids.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Formation testing tools are used to acquire a sample of fluid from a subterranean formation. This sample of fluid can then be analyzed to determine important information regarding the formation and the formation fluid contained within, such as pressure, permeability, and composition. The acquisition of accurate data from the wellbore is critical to the optimization of hydrocarbon wells. This wellbore data can be used to determine the location and quality of hydrocarbon reserves, whether the reserves can be produced through the wellbore, and for well control during drilling operations.




Formation testing tools may be used in conjunction with wireline logging operations or as a component of a logging-while-drilling (LWD) or measurement-while-drilling (MWD) package. In wireline logging operations, the drill string is removed from the wellbore and measurement tools are lowered into the wellbore using a heavy cable (wireline) that includes wires for providing power and control from the surface. In LWD and MWD operations, the measurement tools are integrated into the drill string and are ordinarily powered by batteries and controlled by either on-board or remote control systems.




To understand the mechanics of formation testing, it is important to first understand how hydrocarbons are stored in subterranean formations. Hydrocarbons are not typically located in large underground pools, but are instead found within very small holes, or pores, within certain types of rock. The ability of a formation to allow hydrocarbons to move between the pores, and consequently into a wellbore, is known as permeability. Similarly, the hydrocarbons contained within these formations are usually under pressure and it is important to determine the magnitude of that pressure in order to safely and efficiently produce the well.




During drilling operations, a wellbore is typically filled with a drilling fluid (“mud”), such as water, or a water-based or oil-based mud. The density of the drilling fluid can be increased by adding special solids that are suspended in the mud. Increasing the density of the drilling fluid increases the hydrostatic pressure that helps maintain the integrity of the wellbore a and prevents unwanted formation fluids from entering the wellbore. The drilling fluid is continuously circulated during drilling operations. Over time, as some of the liquid portion of the mud flows into the formation, solids in the mud are deposited on the inner wall of the wellbore to form a mudcake.




The mudcake acts as a membrane between the wellbore, which is filled with drilling fluid, and the hydrocarbon formation. The mudcake also limits the migration of drilling fluids from the area of high hydrostatic pressure in the wellbore to the relatively low-pressure formation. Mudcakes typically range from about 0.25 to 0.5 inch thick, and polymeric mudcakes are often about 0.1 inch thick. The thickness of a mudcake is generally dependent on the time the borehole is exposed to drilling fluid. Thus, in MWD and LWD applications, where a section of the borehole may be very recently drilled, the mudcake may be thinner than in wireline applications.




The structure and operation of a generic formation tester are best explained by referring to FIG.


1


. In a typical formation testing operation, a formation tester


100


is lowered to a desired depth within a wellbore


102


. The wellbore


102


is filled with mud


104


, and the wall of wellbore


102


is coated with a mudcake


106


. Once formation tester


100


is at the desired depth, it is set in place by extending a pair of feet


108


and an isolation pad


110


to engage the mudcake


106


. Isolation pad


110


seals against mudcake


106


and around hollow probe


112


, which places internal cavity


119


in fluid communication with formation


122


. This creates a fluid pathway that allows formation fluid to flow between formation


122


and formation tester


100


while isolated from wellbore fluid


104


.




In order to acquire a useful sample, probe


112


must stay isolated from the relative high pressure of wellbore fluid


104


. Therefore, the integrity of the seal that is formed by isolation pad


110


is critical to the performance of the tool. If wellbore fluid


104


is allowed to leak into the collected formation fluids, an non-representative sample will be obtained and the test will have to be repeated.




Isolation pads that are used with wireline formation testers are generally simple rubber pads affixed to the end of the extending sample probe. The rubber is normally affixed to a metallic plate that provides support to the rubber as well as a connection to the probe. These rubber pads are often molded to fit with the specific diameter hole in which they will be operating. These types of isolator pads are commonly molded to have a contacting surface that is cylindrical or spherical.




While conventional rubber pads are reasonably effective in some wireline operations, when a formation tester is used in a MWD or LWD application, they have not performed as desired. Failure of conventional rubber pads has also been a concern in wireline applications that may require the performance of a large number of formation pressure tests during a single run into the wellbore, especially in wells having particularly harsh operating conditions. In a MWD or LWD environment, the formation tester is integrated into the drill string and is thus subjected to the harsh downhole environment for a much longer period than in a wireline testing application. In addition, during drilling, the formation tester is constantly rotated with the drill string and may contact the side of the wellbore and damage any exposed isolator pads. The pads may also be damaged during drilling by the drill cuttings that are being circulated through the wellbore by the drilling fluid.




Therefore, there remains a need in the art to develop an isolation pad that provides reliable sealing performance with an increased durability and resistance to damage. Therefore, the present invention is directed to methods and apparatus for isolator pad assemblies that effectively seal against a wellbore and are resistant to damage typically incurred during drilling operations. It is also an object of the present invention to provide an isolator pad assembly that has an extended life so as to enhance the number of tests that can be performed without replacing the pad.




SUMMARY OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Accordingly, there are provided herein methods and apparatus for isolator pad assemblies that comprise a primarily metallic pad member and a retractable resilient sealing member. The resilient sealing member is maintained in a retracted, protected position until extended to seal against the wellbore. Once extended to a sealing position, the resilient sealing member acts as a primary seal while the metallic pad member acts as a secondary seal.




One embodiment of a preferred isolator pad comprises a cylindrical outer sleeve that is sealingly engaged with a tool body and is capable of lateral translation in respect to the tool body. Affixed to the extending end of the outer sleeve is a metallic pad that has a contacting surface that is curved and preferably has a raised lip surrounding a penetration through the pad. An inner sleeve is slidingly engaged within the penetration through the pad and has a resilient ring molded to one end. The inner sleeve has an extended position wherein the resilient ring extends past the outer surface of the pad and a retracted position where the resilient ring does not extend past the surface of the pad.




Once the formation testing tool reaches the desired location in the wellbore, the tool is activated and the outer sleeve extended. The metallic pad engages the mudcake on the wellbore and compresses the mudcake until the raised lip contacts the formation. Once the outer sleeve and pad are extended, the inner sleeve extends so that the resilient ring contacts the mudcake. The contact between the resilient ring and the mudcake forms a primary seal to prevent wellbore fluids from entering the inner sleeve during a formation test. A secondary seal is formed by the metallic pad compressing the mudcake.











Thus, the present invention comprises a combination of features and advantages that enable it to reliably isolate a formation testing probe from wellbore fluids and protect the sealing arrangement from damage during the drilling process. These and various other characteristics and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention and by referring to the accompanying drawings.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




For a more detailed understanding of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying Figures, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a schematic representation of a prior art formation testing tool;





FIG. 2

is section view of one embodiment of an isolator probe assembly in a retracted position; and





FIG. 3

is a section view of the embodiment of

FIG. 2

shown in an extended position.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




In the description that follows, like parts are marked throughout the specification and drawings with the same reference numerals, respectively. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale. Certain features of the invention may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form and some details of conventional elements may not be shown in the interest of clarity and conciseness. In the following description, an extended position is taken to mean toward the wall of the wellbore and a retracted position is toward the center of the wellbore. Likewise, in some instances, the terms “proximal” and “proximally” refer to relative positioning toward the center of the wellbore, and the terms “distal” and “distally” refer to relative positioning toward the wall of the wellbore.




The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for seals that isolate a sample probe of a formation testing tool from wellbore fluids. The present invention is susceptible to embodiments of different forms. There are shown in the drawings, and herein will be described in detail, specific embodiments of the present invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered an exemplification of the principles of the invention, and is not intended to limit the invention to that illustrated and described herein. In particular, various embodiments of the present invention provide for isolator pad assemblies especially suited for use in MWD or LWD applications but these assemblies may also be used in wireline logging or other applications. Reference is made to using the embodiments of the present invention with a formation testing tool, but the concepts of the invention may also find use in any tool that seeks to acquire a sample of formation fluid that is substantially free of wellbore fluid. It is to be fully recognized that the different teachings of the embodiments discussed below may be employed separately or in any suitable combination to produce desired results.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of an isolator probe assembly


10


is shown in a retracted position and housed a tool body


12


. Assembly


10


generally comprises an outer sleeve


14


, a pad member


16


, an inner sleeve


18


, and a bridging tube


19


. Inner sleeve


18


is also known as a snorkel and includes filter


17


. Assembly


10


and tool body


12


are shown disposed in a wellbore


20


drilled into a formation


22


. The wall of wellbore


20


is coated with a mudcake


24


that is formed by the circulation of wellbore fluid


26


through the wellbore.




Tool body


12


has a substantially cylindrical body that is typical of tools used in downhole environments. Body


12


includes a hydraulic conduit


28


and a sample conduit


30


therethrough. Sample conduit


30


is in fluid communication with a drawdown chamber (not shown) whose volume can be varied by actuating one or more draw-down pistons (not shown), such as are known in the art. In this manner, the pressure in sample conduit


30


can be selectively controlled. Likewise, hydraulic conduit


28


is in fluid communication with a hydraulic power supply (not shown) that supplies hydraulic fluid to conduit


28


.




Outer sleeve


14


of assembly


10


is a generally cylindrical and is disposed within a corresponding cavity in body


12


. The outer surface of outer sleeve


14


includes a reduced diameter portion


13


extending toward the tool axis from a main portion


15


. A shoulder


17


is defined between reduced diameter portion


13


and main portion


15


. The outer surfaces of reduced diameter portion


13


and main portion


15


are in sealing engagement with the inner surface of the cavity in the tool body. Outer sleeve


14


is sealed to and slidable relative to tool body


12


.




Outer sleeve


14


includes an axial central bore


32


therethrough. Central bore


32


includes a reduced diameter portion


33


within reduced diameter portion


13


, an intermediate diameter portion


35


, and a large diameter portion


37


. Intermediate diameter portion


35


and large diameter portion


37


of bore


32


are within main portion


15


of outer sleeve


14


. A proximal shoulder


31


is defined between reduced diameter portion


13


and intermediate diameter portion


35


and an intermediate shoulder


39


is defined between intermediate diameter portion


35


and large diameter portion


37


. Central bore


32


is in fluid communication with sample conduit


30


. A conduit


54


provides fluid communication between shoulder


17


on the outer surface of sleeve


14


and intermediate shoulder


39


in bore


32


.




Pad


16


is preferably generally disc-shaped, with a substantially flat trailing side


42


and a cylindrically or spherically curved contact surface


44


. The diameter of pad


16


is preferably greater than the largest diameter of outer sleeve


14


. If desired, a recess


11


in tool body


12


is sized and configured to receive pad


16


so that no portion of assembly


10


extends beyond the outer surface of the tool body


12


when the assembly


10


is in its retracted position.




An annular stop member


36


extends from trailing side


42


, away from the borehole wall. Annular stop member


36


defines a central bore


40


, which has a uniform diameter along its length and which extends through pad


16


. Stop member


36


is preferably affixed to the inner surface of large diameter portion


37


of bore


32


in outer sleeve


14


by means of threads


34


or other suitable device. A seal


65


is provided between stop member


36


and the inner surface of bore


32


.




Pad


16


preferably includes a raised lip or boss


48


that extends outward from contact surface around the circumference of bore


40


. Lip


48


preferably has a curved leading edge. Pad


16


is preferably constructed of a stainless steel or other corrosion resistant metal.




Inner sleeve


18


is a generally cylindrical body having a bore


21


therethrough. Near the proximal end of sleeve


18


, the outer surface of sleeve


18


includes an enlarged diameter portion


23


forming a shoulder


25


and the inner surface of bore


21


includes a reduced diameter portion


27


forming a shoulder


29


. Inner sleeve


18


also preferably includes filter


17


that serves to prevent large pieces of mudcake from entering bridging tube


19


.




A resilient ring


46


is molded to the distal end of inner sleeve


18


. Resilient ring


46


preferably has a radiused leading edge and is preferably molded to sleeve


18


such that only the base


47


of ring


46


is affixed to inner sleeve


18


. Resilient ring


46


is preferably constructed from a resilient material such as rubber or a resilient polymer.




Inner sleeve


18


is received in bore


32


of outer sleeve


14


and is slidable therein. When the assembly


10


is in its retracted position, the proximal end of inner sleeve


18


bears on intermediate shoulder


39


. The distal end of sleeve


18


extends into annular stop member


36


of pad


16


and is in slidable, sealing engagement with the inner surface of bore


40


. Seal


67


prevents fluid flow along the interface between sleeve


18


and the inner surface of bore


40


.




Bore


21


of inner sleeve


18


receives bridging tube


19


. Bridging tube


19


is preferably cylindrical, with its outer diameter corresponding to the inner diameter of reduced diameter portion


27


of bore


21


. Bridging tube


19


is in slidable, sealing engagement with bore


21


of inner sleeve


18


and intermediate diameter portion


35


of bore


32


in outer sleeve


14


. Bridging tube


19


includes a fluid conduit


41


that provides fluid communication between bore


32


and bore


21


. Conduit


41


preferably communicates with bore


32


via an axial opening


43


and with bore


21


via one or more lateral openings


45


at the distal end of tube


19


. When assembly


10


is in its retracted position, as shown in

FIG. 2

, bridging tube


19


preferably extends almost to the distal edge of probe assembly


10


and filter


19


in order to prevent debris from collecting in the assembly. Bridging tube


19


may also be keyed to prevent rotation relative to inner sleeve


18


or outer sleeve


14


.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, probe assembly


10


is extended by applying fluid pressure through hydraulic conduit


28


so that hydraulic pressure is applied between outer sleeve


14


and body


12


. The pressure advances outer sleeve


14


pad


16


toward the wall of the wellbore. A hydraulic chamber


52


is defined between tool body


12


and outer sleeve


14


and between seals


62


and


64


. Outer sleeve


14


and inner sleeve


18


are preferably arranged so that outer sleeve


14


extends before inner sleeve


18


extends. This may be achieved by arranged the respective pressure areas and adjusting the sliding friction relationships of sleeves


14


,


18


so that it takes a greater fluid pressure to move inner sleeve


18


than the pressure required to move outer sleeve


14


.




Thus, pad


16


is advanced through the mudcake


24


until raised lip


48


contacts the formation


22


. Contact surface


44


of pad


16


compresses mudcake


24


against formation


22


, forming a region


58


of mudcake that has very low permeability, thus forming a secondary seal. It is preferred that mudcake


24


be present on the wellbore wall to provide a compressible material that can form a seal with pad


16


. Contact surface


44


of pad


16


may be smooth or rough.




As additional hydraulic fluid is pumped into hydraulic chamber


52


and through port


54


into large diameter portion


37


of bore


32


, pressure increases behind inner sleeve


18


, advancing it toward formation


22


. A second hydraulic chamber


56


is defined between outer sleeve


14


, inner sleeve


18


, and bridging tube


19


, and between seals


61


,


63


,


65


and


67


. Inner sleeve


18


advances until resilient ring


46


is compressed against formation


22


and forms a primary seal. Bridging tube


19


preferably maintains a position that does not allow fluid flow into assembly


10


but is retracted to allow fluid to flow through filter


17


as the pressure within conduit


30


decreases.




In this manner, the combination of the primary seal created by resilient ring


46


and the secondary seal created by pad


16


hydraulically isolates the interior


60


of probe assembly


10


from wellbore fluid


26


. Once the assembly


10


is in its extended position, a sample of formation fluid can be acquired by decreasing the pressure within sample conduit


30


, which will allow fluid from formation


22


to flow through mudcake


24


, into bore


21


, through filter


17


, into bridging tube


14


, and thus into sample conduit


30


. Once a suitable sample has been collected, probe assembly


10


can be returned to the retracted position by reducing the pressure within hydraulic conduit


28


. Assembly


10


is preferably retractable by applying positive fluid pressure but may also be retracted using only hydrostatic pressure from the well.




Therefore, the above described extendable probe assembly provides a sealing pad that is protected from damage during the drilling process and can to take a plurality of samples during a single trip into the wellbore. The use of both primary and secondary sealing mechanisms also increases the reliability of the sealing system.




The embodiments set forth herein are merely illustrative and do not limit the scope of the invention or the details therein. It will be appreciated that many other modifications and improvements to the disclosure herein may be made without departing from the scope of the invention or the inventive concepts herein disclosed. Because many varying and different embodiments may be made within the scope of the inventive concept herein taught, including equivalent structures or materials hereafter thought of, and because many modifications may be made in the embodiments herein detailed in accordance with the descriptive requirements of the law, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.



Claims
  • 1. An isolator probe assembly for analyzing a formation through a wellbore lined with a mudcake, said assembly comprising:an inner sleeve having a first end a resilient ring disposed on the first end of said inner sleeve and adapted to sealingly engage the wellbore to form a primary seal; and a pad having a shaped portion adapted to compress the mudcake against the wellbore to form a secondary seal, wherein said pad is adapted to receive said inner sleeve, said inner sleeve is moveable between a first position and second position.
  • 2. An isolator probe assembly for analyzing a formation through a wellbore lined with a mudcake, said assembly comprising:an inner sleeve having a first end a resilient ring disposed on the first end of said inner sleeve; a pad having a shaped portion and adapted to receive said inner sleeve, wherein said inner sleeve is moveable between a first position and second position; and a raised lip protruding from the shaped portion of said pad.
  • 3. The probe assembly of claim 1 wherein said resilient ring is recessed within said pad in the first position.
  • 4. The probe assembly of claim 1 wherein said resilient ring protrudes from said pad in the second position.
  • 5. The probe assembly of claim 1 wherein said shaped portion is curved in one direction.
  • 6. An isolator probe assembly for analyzing a formation through a wellbore lined with a mudcake, said assembly comprising:an inner sleeve having a first end a resilient ring disposed on the first end of said inner sleeve; and a pad having a shaped portion and adapted to receive said inner sleeve, wherein said inner sleeve is moveable between a first position and second position, wherein said shaped portion is curved in two directions.
  • 7. The probe assembly of claim 1 further comprising a body adapted to receive said pad wherein said pad is moveable between a first and second position.
  • 8. The probe assembly of claim 7 wherein said pad is moved by hydraulic force.
  • 9. The probe assembly of claim 1 wherein said inner sleeve is moved by hydraulic force.
  • 10. The probe assembly of claim 7 wherein said body is further adapted to collect a fluid sample through said inner sleeve.
  • 11. A formation tester for analyzing a formation through a wellbore lined with a mudcake, said tester comprising:a body; a pad member having a shaped portion with a curved side thereon and a penetration therethrough; a raised lip disposed on the shaped portion of said pad; a sleeve member disposed within said penetration and moveable between a first position and a second position; and a resilient sealing member disposed on said sleeve member, wherein in the first position said resilient member is recessed within said pad and in the second position said resilient member extends beyond the curved side of said pad.
  • 12. The formation tester of claim 11 further comprising:a cavity disposed within said body and having a first portion and a second portion; a hydraulic supply system connected to said first portion; a sample collection system connected to said second portion; and an outer sleeve adapted to fit within said cavity and connected to said pad member.
  • 13. A method for sealing an extendable probe assembly against a wellbore wall having a mudcake, the method comprising:extending a pad to compress the mudcake; extending an inner sleeve through the pad; and compressing a resilient ring disposed on said inner sleeve against the mudcake.
  • 14. A method for sealing an extendable probe assembly against a wellbore wall having a mudcake, the method comprising:extending a pad to compress the mudcake; extending an inner sleeve through the pad; and compressing a resilient ring disposed on said inner sleeve against the mudcake wherein the pad has a raised lip.
  • 15. A method for collecting a fluid sample from a formation through a wellbore lined with a mudcake, the method comprising:disposing a formation tester into the wellbore; extending a probe assembly to form a primary seal and a secondary seal that prevent wellbore fluids from entering the formation tester; and drawing a sample of fluid from the formation, through the probe assembly, and into the formation tester wherein the primary seal is created by compressing a resilient ring against the mudcake and the secondary seal is created by compressing the mudcake with a shaped pad, wherein the resilient ring and the shaped pad are moveable so as to extend outward from the probe assembly.
US Referenced Citations (56)
Number Name Date Kind
3076334 Wiley Feb 1963 A
3530933 Whitten Sep 1970 A
3565169 Bell Feb 1971 A
3811321 Urbanosky May 1974 A
3813936 Urbanosky et al. Jun 1974 A
3858445 Urbanosky Jan 1975 A
3859850 Whitten et al. Jan 1975 A
3859851 Urbanosky Jan 1975 A
3864970 Bell Feb 1975 A
3924463 Urbanosky Dec 1975 A
3934468 Brieger Jan 1976 A
3952588 Whitten Apr 1976 A
4210018 Brieger Jul 1980 A
4287946 Brieger Sep 1981 A
4339948 Hallmark Jul 1982 A
4416152 Wilson Nov 1983 A
4434653 Montgomery Mar 1984 A
4507957 Montgomery et al. Apr 1985 A
4513612 Shalek Apr 1985 A
4593560 Purfurst Jun 1986 A
4745802 Purfurst May 1988 A
4843878 Purfurst et al. Jul 1989 A
4845982 Gilbert Jul 1989 A
4860580 DuRocher Aug 1989 A
4860581 Zimmerman Aug 1989 A
4879900 Gilbert Nov 1989 A
4884439 Baird Dec 1989 A
4890487 Dussan V. et al. Jan 1990 A
4936139 Zimmerman Jun 1990 A
4941350 Schneider Jul 1990 A
4951749 Carroll Aug 1990 A
5056595 Desbrandes Oct 1991 A
5095745 Desbrandes Mar 1992 A
5101907 Schultz et al. Apr 1992 A
5230244 Gilbert Jul 1993 A
5231874 Gilbert Aug 1993 A
5233866 Desbrandes Aug 1993 A
5238070 Schultz et al. Aug 1993 A
5265015 Auzerais et al. Nov 1993 A
5269180 Dave et al. Dec 1993 A
5279153 Dussan V. et al. Jan 1994 A
5303775 Michaels et al. Apr 1994 A
5317932 Westlake, III et al. Jun 1994 A
5329811 Schultz et al. Jul 1994 A
5335542 Ramakrishnan et al. Aug 1994 A
5377755 Michaels et al. Jan 1995 A
5473939 Leder et al. Dec 1995 A
5549159 Shwe et al. Aug 1996 A
5587525 Shwe et al. Dec 1996 A
5602334 Proett et al. Feb 1997 A
5622223 Vasquez Apr 1997 A
5635631 Yesudas et al. Jun 1997 A
5644076 Proett et al. Jul 1997 A
5907110 Garcia et al. May 1999 A
6047239 Berger et al. Apr 2000 A
6332369 Bombe et al. Dec 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0 697 501 Aug 1995 EP
2 304 906 Mar 1997 GB
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
UK Search Report for Appln. No. GB 0302562.4 dated Apr. 10, 2003.