Patent Grant
RE39532
The present invention relates to novel metallocenes which contain ligands of 2-substituted indenyl derivatives and can very advantageously be used as catalysts in the preparation of polyolefins of high melting point (high isotacticity).
Polyolefins of relatively high melting point and thus relatively high crystallinity and relatively high hardness are particularly important as engineering materials (for example large hollow articles, tubes and moldings).
Chiral metallocenes are, in combination with aluminoxanes, active, sterospecific catalysts for the preparation of polyolefins (U.S. Pat. No. 4,769,510). These metallocenes also include substituted indene compounds. Thus, for example, the use of the ethylenebis(4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)zirconium dichloride/aluminoxane catalyst system is known for the preparation of isotactic polypropylene; cf. EP-A 185 918). Both this and numerous other polymerization processes coming under the prior art have, in particular, the disadvantage that, at industrially interesting polymerization temperatures, only polymers of relatively low melting points are obtained. Their crystallinity and thus their hardness are too low for use as engineering materials.
Surprisingly, it has now been found that metallocenes which contain, as ligands, certain 2-substituted indenyl derivatives are suitable catalysts for the preparation of polyolefins of high isotacticity (melting point) and narrow molecular weight distribution.
The present invention therefore provides the compounds of the formula I below
in which
In the formula I, M1 is a metal from group IVb, Vb or VIb of the Periodic Table, for example titanium, zirconium, hafnium, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, chromium, molybdenum or tungsten, preferably zirconium, hafnium or titanium.
The radicals R10 are identical or different and are as defined for R11, R12 and R13. The radicals R10 are preferably hydrogen atoms or C1-C10-, preferably C1-C4-alkyl groups.
The particularly preferred metallocenes are thus those in which, in the formula I, M1 is Zr or Hf, R1 and R2 are identical or different and are methyl or chlorine, R3 and R4 are hydrogen, R5 and R6 are identical or different and are methyl, ethyl or trifluoromethyl, R7 is a
radical, n plus m is zero or 1, and R10 is hydrogen; in particular the compounds I listed in the working examples.
Of the metallocenes I mentioned in the working examples, rac-dimethylsilyl(2-methyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride, rac-ethylene(2-methyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride, racdimethylsilyl(2-methyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)2dimethylzirconium and rac-ethylene(2-methyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)2dimethylzirconium are particularly important.
The chiral metallocenes are employed as racemates for the preparation of highly isotactic poly-1-olefins. However, it is also possible to use the pure R- or S-form. These pure stereoisomeric forms allow the preparation of an optically active polymer. However, the meso form of the metallocenes should be separated off since the polymerization-active center (the metal atom) in these compounds is no longer chiral due to mirror symmetry at the central metal, and it is therefore not possible to produce a highly isotactic polymer.
The principle of resolution of the stereoisomers is known.
The present invention furthermore provides a process for the preparation of the metallocenes I, which comprises
a) reacting a compound of the formula II
in which R3-R10, m and n are defined in the formula I and M3 is an alkali metal, preferably lithium, with a compound of the formula III
M1X4 (III)
in which M1 is a defined in the formula I, and X is a halogen atom, preferably chlorine, and catalytically hydrogenating the reaction product, or
b) reacting a compound of the formula IIa
with a compound of the formula III
M1X4 (III)
in which all the substituents are as defined under a), and, if desired, derivatizing the reaction product obtained under a) or b).
The synthesis is carried out under a protective gas and in anhydrous solvents. The dried salt of the formula II/IIa is added to a suspension of the compound of the formula III in a solvent such as toluene, n-hexane, dichloromethane, ether, THF, n-pentane or benzene, preferably dichloromethane or toluene. The reaction temperature is from −78° C. to 30° C., preferably from −40° C. to 10° C. The reaction duration is from 0.25 to 24 hours, preferably from 1 to 4 hours.
A further embodiment of the process according to the invention comprises replacing the compound III, M1X4, by a compound of the formula IIIa, M1X4L2. In this formula, L is a donor ligand. Examples of suitable donor ligands are tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, dimethyl ether, inter alia, preferably tetrahydrofuran (THF).
In this case, a solution of the salt of the formula II/IIa in one of the abovementioned solvents is added to a solution or suspension of a compound of the formula IIIa in a solvent such as toluene, xylene, ether or THF, preferably THF. However, an alternative procedure is to simultaneously add both components dropwise to a solvent. This is the preferred procedure. The reaction temperature is from −40° C. to 100° C., preferably from 0° C. to 50° C., in particular from 10° C. to 35° C. The reaction duration is from 0.25 hour to 48 hours, preferably from 1 hour to 24 hours, in particular from 2 hours to 9 hours.
The hydrogenation is carried out in a dry, anhydrous solvent such as H2CCl2 or glyme. The reaction temperature is 20° to 70° C., preferably from ambient temperature to 50° C., the pressure is from 5 to 200 bar, preferably from 20 to 120 bar, in particular from 35 to 100 bar, and the reaction duration is from 0.25 to 24 hours, preferably from 0.5 to 18 hours, in particular from 1 to 12 hours. Hydrogenation reactors which can be used are steel autoclaves. The hydrogenation catalyst used is platinum, platinum oxide, palladium or another conventional transition-metal catalyst.
The halogen derivatives obtained in this way can be converted into the alkyl, aryl or alkenyl complexes by known standard methods.
The compounds of the formulae II and IIa are synthesized by deprotonation. This reaction is known; cf. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 2030-2031, ibid. 110 (1988) 6255-6256, ibid. 109 (1987), 6544-6545, J. Organomet. Chem., 322 (1987) 65-70, New. J. Chem. 14 (1990) 499-503 and the working examples.
The synthesis of the protonated forms of the compounds of these formulae has also been described, with the difference that they are not correspondingly substituted in the α- and β-positions (Bull. Soc. Chim., 1967, 2954). The bridging units required for their synthesis are generally commercially available, but the indenyl compounds required, by contrast, are not. Some literature references containing synthesis procedures are indicated; the procedure for indene derivatives which are not mentioned is analogous: J. Org. Chem., 49 (1984) 4226-4237, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin II, 1981, 403-408, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106 (1984) 6702, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 65 (1943) 567, J. Med. Chem., 30 (1987) 1303-1308, Chem. Ber. 85 (1952) 78-85 and the working examples.
The metallocenes I can thus in principle be prepared in accordance with the reaction scheme below:
The cocatalyst used according to the invention in the polymerization of olefins is an aluminoxane of the formula (IV)
for the linear type and/or of the formula (V)
for the cyclic type, where, in the formulae (IV) and (V), the radicals R may be identical or different and are a C1-C6-alkyl group, a C6-C18-aryl group or hydrogen, and p is an integer from 2 to 50, preferably from 10 to 35.
The radicals R are preferably identical and are methyl, isobutyl, phenyl or benzyl, particularly preferably methyl.
If the radicals R are different, they are preferably methyl and hydrogen or alternatively methyl and isobutyl, preferably from 0.01 to 40% (of the number of radicals R) being hydrogen or isobutyl.
The aluminoxane can be prepared in different ways by known processes. One of the methods is, for example, the reaction of an aluminium-hydrocarbon compound and/or a hydridoaluminum-hydrocarbon compound with water (gaseous, solid, liquid or bound—for example as water of crystallization) in an inert solvent (such as, for example, toluene). In order to prepare an aluminoxane containing different alkyl groups R, two different trialkylaluminum compounds (AlR3+AlR′3) in accordance with the desired composition are reacted with water (cf. S. Pasynkiewicz, Polyhedron 9 (1990) 429 and EP-A 302 424).
The precise structure of the aluminoxanes IV and V is not known.
Irrespective of the preparation method, a varying content of unreacted aluminum starting compound, in free form or as an adduct, is common to all the aluminoxane solutions.
It is possible to preactivate the metallocene I using an aluminoxane of the formula (IV) and/or (V) before use in the polymerization reaction. This considerably increases the polymerization activity and improves the particle morphology.
The preactivation of the transition-metal compound is carried out in solution. The metallocene is preferably dissolved in a solution of the aluminoxane in an inert hydrocarbon. Suitable inert hydrocarbons are aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons. Toluene is preferred.
The concentration of the aluminoxane in the solution is in the range from about 1% by weight up to the saturation limit, preferably from 5 to 30% by weight, in each case based on the entire solution. The metallocene can be employed in the same concentration, but is preferably employed in an amount of from 10−4-1 mol per mole of aluminoxane. The preactivation time is from 5 minutes to 60 hours, preferably from 5 to 60 minutes. The preactivation temperature is from −78° C. to 100° C., preferably from 0 to 70° C.
The metallocene can also be prepolymerized or applied to a support. The prepolymerization is preferably carried out using the olefin (or one of the olefins) employed in the polymerization.
Examples of suitable supports are silica gels, aluminum oxides, solid aluminoxane or other inorganic support materials. Another suitable support material is a polyolefin powder in finely divided form.
A further possible variation of the process comprises using a salt-like compound of the formula RxNH4-xBR′4 or of the formula R3PHBR′4 as cocatalyst instead of or in addition to an aluminoxane. x here is 1, 2 or 3, the R radicals are identical or different and are alkyl or aryl, and R′ aryl, which may also be fluorinated or partially fluorinated. In this case, the catalyst comprises the product of the reaction of a metallocene with one of said compounds (cf. EP-A 277 004).
The polymerization or copolymerization is carried out in a known manner in solution, in suspension or in the gas phase, continuously or batchwise, in one or more steps, at a temperature of from 0° to 150° C., preferably from 30° to 80° C. Olefins of the formula Ra—CH═CH—Rb are polymerized or copolymerized. In this formula, Ra and Rb are identical or different and are a hydrogen atom or an alkyl radical having 1 to 14 carbon atoms.
However, Ra and Rb, together with the carbon atoms connecting them, may also form a ring. Examples of such olefins are ethylene, propylene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-octene, norbornene or norbornadiene. In particular, propylene and ethylene are polymerized.
The molecular weight regulator added, if necessary, is hydrogen. The overall pressure in the polymerization system is from 0.5 to 100 bar. The polymerization is preferably carried out in the industrially particularly interesting pressure range of from 5 to 64 bar.
The metallocene is used in a concentration, based on the transition metal, of from 10−3 to 10−8, preferably from 10−4 to 10−7 mol of transition metal per dm3 of solvent or per dm3 of reactor volume. The aluminoxane is used in a concentration of from 10−5 to 10−1 mol, preferably from 10−4 to 10−2 mol, per dm3 of solvent or per dm3 of reactor volume. In principle, however, higher concentrations are also possible.
If the polymerization is carried out as a suspension or solution polymerization, an inert solvent which is customary for the Ziegler low-pressure process is used. For example, the polymerization is carried out in an aliphatic or cycloaliphatic hydrocarbon; examples of these which may be mentioned are butane, pentane, hexane, heptane, isooctane, cyclohexane and methylcyclohexane.
It is also possible to use a petroleum ether or hydrogenated diesel oil fraction. Toluene can also be used.
The polymerization is preferably carried out in the liquid monomer.
If inert solvents are used, the monomers are metered in in gaseous or liquid form.
The polymerization can have any desired duration since the catalyst system to be used according to the invention exhibits only a low time-dependent drop in polymerization activity.
The process is distinguished by the fact that the metallocenes according to the invention give, in the industrially interesting temperature range of between 30° and 80° C, polymers of high molecular weight, high stereospecificity, narrow molecular weight dispersity and, in particular, high melting point, which is to say high crystallinity and high hardness.
The examples below are intended to illustrate the invention in greater detail.
The following abbreviations are used:
13C-NMR spectroscopy
The melting points and heats of melting Δ Hmelt were determined using DSC (heating and cooling rate 20° C./min).
Synthesis of the starting substances
I) Synthesis of 2-Me-indene
110.45 g (0.836 mol) of 2-indanone were dissolved in 500 ml of diethyl ether, and 290 cm3 of 3N (0.87 mol) ethereal methylGrignard solution were added dropwise at such a rate that the mixture refluxed gently. After the mixture had boiled for 2 hours under gentle reflux, it was transferred onto an ice/hydrochloric acid mixture, and a pH of 2-3 was established using ammonium chloride. The organic phase was separated off, washed with NaHCO3 and sodium chloride solution and dried, giving 98 g of crude product (2-hydroxy-2-methylindane), which was not purified further.
This product was dissolved in 500 cm3 of toluene, 3 g of p-toluenesulfonic acid were added, and the mixture was heated on a water separator until the elimination of water was complete, and was evaporated, the residue was taken up in dichloromethane, the dichloromethane solution was filtered through silica gel, and the filtrate was distilled in vacuo (80° C./10 mbar).
Yield: 28.49 g (0.22 mol/26%).
The synthesis of this compound is also described in: C. F. Koelsch, P. R. Johnson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 65 (1943) 567-573.
II) Synthesis of (2-Me-indene)2SiMe2
13 g (100 mmol) of 2-Me-indene were dissolved in 400 cm3 of diethyl ether, and 62.5 cm 3 of 1.6N (100 mmol) n-butyllithium/n-hexane solution were added dropwise over the course of 1 hour with ice cooling, and the mixture was then stirred at −35° C. for a further 1 hour.
6.1 cm3 (50 mmol) of dimehtyldichlorosilane were introduced into 50 cm3 of Et2O, and the lithio salt solution was added dropwise at 0° C. over the course of 5 hours, the mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and left to stand over the weekend.
The solid which had deposited was filtered off, and the filtrate was evaporated to dryness. The product was extracted using small portions of n-hexane, and the extracts were filtered and evaporated, giving 5.7 g (18.00 mmol) of white crystals. The mother liquor was evaporated, and the residue was then purified by column chromatography (n-hexane/H2CCl2 9:1 by volume), giving a further 2.5 g (7.9 mmol/52%) of product (as an isomer mixture).
Rf(SiO2; n-hexane/H2CCl2 9:1 by volume)=0.37.
The 1H-NMR spectrum exhibits the signals expected for an isomer mixture with respect to shift and integration ratio.
III) Synthesis of (2-Me-Ind)2CH2CH2
3 g (23 mmol) of 2-Me-indene were dissolved in 50 cm3 of THF, 14.4 cm3 of 1.6N (23.04 mmol) n-butyllithium/n-hexane solution were added dropwise, and the mixture was then stirred at 65° C. for 1 hour. 1 cm3 (11.5 mmol) of 1,2-dibromoethane was then added at −78° C., and the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and was stirred for 5 hours. The mixture was evaporated, and the residue was purified by column chromatography (SiO2; n-hexane/H2CCl2 9:1 by volume).
The fractions containing the product were combined and evaporated, the residue was taken up in dry ether, the solution was dried over MgSO4 and filtered, and the solvent was stripped off.
Yield: 1.6 g (5.59 mmol/49%) of isomer mixture Rf (SiO2; n-hexane/H2CCl2 9:1 by volume)=0.46.
The 1H-NMR spectrum corresponds to expectations for an isomer mixture in signal shift and integration.
Synthesis of the metallocenes I
IV) rac-Dimethylsilyl(2-Me-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride
a. Synthesis of the precursor rac-dimethylsilyl(2-Me-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride
1.68 g (5.31 mmol) of the chelate ligand dimethylsilyl(2-methylindene)2 were introduced into 50 cm3 of THF, and 6.63 cm3 of a 1.6N (10.61 mmol) n-BuLi/n-hexane solution were added dropwise at ambient temperature over the course of 0.5 hour. The mixture was stirred for 2 hours at about 35° C., the solvent was stripped off in vacuo, and the residue was stirred with n-pentane, filtered off and dried.
The dilithio salt obtained in this way was added at −78° C. to a suspension of 1.24 g (5.32 mmol) of ZrCl in 50 cm3 of CH2Cl2, and the mixture was stirred at this temperature for 3 hours. The mixture was then warmed to room temperature overnight and evaporated. The 1H-NMR spectrum showed, in addition to the presence of some ZrCl4(thf)2, a rac/meso mixture. After stirring with n-pentane and drying, the solid, yellow residue was suspended in THF, filtered off and examined by NMR spectroscopy. These three working steps were repeated a number of times; finally, 0.35 g (0.73 mmol/14%) of product was obtained in which the rac form, according to 1 H-NMR, was enriched to more than 17:1.
The compound exhibited a correct elemental analysis and the following NMR signals (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ=1.25 (s, 6H, Si-Me); 2.18 (s, 6H, 2-Me); 6.8 (s, 2H, 3-H-Ind); 6.92-7.75 (m, 8H, 4-7-H-Ind).
b. Synthesis of the end product
0.56 g (1.17 mmol) of the precursor rac-dimethylsilyl(2-Me-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride were dissolved in 70 cm3 of CH2Cl2 and the solution was introduced, together with 40 mg of PtO2, into a 200 cm3 NOVA stirred autoclave. The mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 4 hours under an H2 pressure of 40 bar. The filtrate was evaporated, the residue was washed with toluene/n-hexane (1:2 by volume), filtered and evaporated. N-pentane was added, and the suspension obtained was filtered off and dried. The yield was 0.34 g (0.7 mmol/60%). The 1H-NMR spectrum (CD2Cl2, 100 MHz) showed the following signals:
δ=0.90 (s, 6H, Me-Si); 1.43-1.93 (m, 8H, indenyl-H); 2.10 (s, 6H, 2-Me); 2.44-3.37 (m, 8H, indenyl-H); 6.05 (s, 2H, 3-H-Ind).
V) Synthesis of rac-ethylene(2-Me-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrol-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride
a. Synthesis of the precursor rac-ethylene(2-Me-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride
14.2 cm3 of 2.5N (35.4 mmol) n-BuLi/n-hexane solution were added dropwise over the course of 1 hour at room temperature to 5.07 g (17.7 mmol) of the ligand ethylene(2-methylindene)2 in 200 cm3 of THF, and the mixture was then stirred at about 50° C. for 3 hours. A precipitate which formed temporarily dissolved again. The mixture was left to stand overnight.
6.68 g (17.7 mmol) of ZrCl4(thf)2 in 250 cm3 of THF were added dropwise, simultaneously with the above dilithio salt solution, to about 50 cm3 of THF at 50° C., and the mixture was then stirred at this temperature for 20 hours. The toluene extract of the evaporation residue was evaporated. The residue was extracted with a little THF, and the product was recrystallized from toluene, giving 0.44 g (0.99 mmol/5.6%) of product in which the rac form was enriched to more than 15:1.
The compound exhibited a correct elemental analysis and the following NMR signals (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ=2.08 (2s, 6H, 2-Me); 3.45-4.18 (m, 4H, —CH2C-H2—); 6.65 (2H, 3-H-Ind); 7.05-7.85 (m, 8H, 4-7-H-Ind).
b. Synthesis of the end product
56 .g (1.25 mmol) of rac-ethylene(2-Me-1-indenyl)2-zirconium dichloride was dissolved in 50 cm3 of CH2Cl2, and the solution was introduced, together with 40 mg of PtO2, into a 200 cm3 NOVA stirred autoclave. The mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 2 hours under an H2 pressure of 40 bar and evaporated to dryness, and the residue was sublimed in a high vacuum at a bath temperature of about 100° C., giving 0.46 g (1.01 mmol/81%) of product. The elemental analysis was correct, and the 1H-NMR spectrum showed the following signals: δ=1.46-1.92 (m, 8H, indenyl-H), 2.14 (s, 6H, 2-Me); 2.49-2.73 (m, 6H, indenyl-H and —CH2CH2—), 2.89-3.49 (m, 6H, indenyl-H); 6.06 (s, 2H, 3-H-Ind).
VI) Me2Zr[(2-Me-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2CH2CH2]
5 cm3 of 1.6N (8 mmol) of ethereal methyllithium solution were added dropwise at −50° C. to 1.27 g (2.79 mmol) of Cl2Zr[(2-Me-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2CH2CH2] in 20 cm3 of Et2O, and the mixture was then stirred for 1 hour at −10° C. The solvent was replaced by n-hexane, and the mixture was stirred for a further 2 hours at room temperature, filtered and evaporated.
Yield: 1 g (2.40 mmol/86%); correct elemental analysis.
VII) Me2Zr[(2-Me-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2SiMe2]
4.3 cm3 of 1.6N (6.88 mmol) of ethereal methyllithium solution were added dropwise over the course of 15 minutes at −35° C. to 1.33 g (2.74 mmol) of Cl2Zr[(2-Me-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2SiMe2] in 25 cm3 of Et2O. The mixture was stirred for 1 hour, the solvent was replaced by n-hexane, the mixture was stirred for 2 hours at 10° C. and then filtered, the filtrate was evaporated, and the residue was sublimed in a high vacuum.
Yield: 1.02 g (2.49 mmol/89%); correct elemental analysis
VIII) Cl2Zr[(2-Me-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2SiMePh]
1.5 g (2.78 mmol) of Cl2Zr[(2-Me-Ind)2SiMePh] and 60 mg of PtO2 in 80 cm3 of H2CCl2 were hydrogenated for 5 hours at 40° C. in a stirred autoclave under an H2 pressure of 30 bar. The mixture was filtered, the solvent was stripped off, and the residue was sublimed in a high vacuum.
Yield: 0.71 g (1.30 mmol/47%); correct elemental analysis.
IX) Cl2Zr[(2-Me-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2SiPh2]
0.8 g (1.33 mmol) of Cl2Zr[(2-Me-Ind)2SiPh2], dissolved in 50 cm3 of H2CCl2, were stirred for 3 hours at 40° C. with 30 mg of Pt under an H2 pressure of 50 bar. The mixture was filtered, the filtrate was evaporated, the residue was washed with warm n-hexane, the mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated.
Yield: 0.36 g (0.59 mmol/44%); correct elemental analysis.
X) Cl2Zr[(2-Et-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2CH2CH2]
1.09 g (2.30 mmol) of Cl2Zr[(2-Et-Ind)2CH2CH2] in 80 cm3 of H2CCl2 were hydrogenated for 1 hour at ambient temperature together with 50 mg of PtO2 under an H2 pressure of 80 bar. The mixture was filtered, the filtrate was evaporated, and the residue was sublimed in a high vacuum.
Yield: 0.94 g (1.95 mmol/85%); correct elemental analysis.
XI) Cl2Zr[(2-Et-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2SiMe2]
2.00 g (3.96 mmol) of Cl2Zr[(2-Et-Ind)2SiMe2]in 100 cm3 of H2CCl2 were hydrogenated for 3 hours at 35° C. together with 60 mg of PtO2 under an H2 pressure of 50 bar. The mixture was filtered, the filtrate was evaporated, and the residue was recrystallized from n-pentane.
Yield: 1.41 g (2.75 mmol/69%); correct elemental analysis.
XII) Cl2Zr[(2-Me-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2CHMeCH2]
0.80 g (1.73 mmol) of Cl2Zr[(2-Me-Ind)2CHMeCH2] in 40 cm3 of H2CCl2 were stirred for 1 hour at ambient temperature together with 30 mg of PtO2 under an H2 pressure of 80 bar, the mixture was then filtered, the filtrate was evaporated, and the residue was sublimed.
Yield: 0.55 g (1.17 mmol/68%); correct elemental analysis.
XIII) Cl2Zr[(2-Me-4,5,6,7-H4-Ind)2CMe2]
0.3 g (0.65 mmol) of Cl2Zr[(2-Me-Ind)2CMe2] in 30 cm3 of H2CCl2 were hydrogenated for 1 hour at ambient temperature together with 30 mg of Pt under an H2 pressure of 70 bar. The solvent was stripped off, and the residue was sublimed in a high vacuum.
Yield: 0.21 g (0.45 mmol/69%); correct elemental analysis
Abbreviations:
Me=methyl, Et=ethyl, Bu=butyl, Ph=phenyl,
Ind=indenyl, THF=tetrahydrofuran, PP=polypropylene,
PE=polyethylene.
Metallocenes I as catalysts for the polymerization of olefins
12 dm3 of liquid propylene were introduced into a dry 24 dm3 reactor which has been flushed with nitrogen. 35 cm3 of a toluene solution of methylaluminoxane (corresponding to 52 mmol of Al, mean degree of oligomerization n=17) were then added, and the batch was stirred at 30° C. for 15 minutes. In parallel, 5.3 mg (0.011 mmol) of rac-dimethylsilyl(2-Me-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride were dissolved in 13.5 cm3 of a toluene solution of methylaluminoxane (20 mmol of Al) and preactivated by standing for 15 minutes. The solution was then introduced into the reactor and the polymerization system was heated to 70° C. (over the course of 5 minutes) and kept at this temperature for 3 hours by cooling.
The activity of the metallocene was 50.3 kg of PP/g of metallocene×h.
VN=37 cm3/g; Mw=24 300 g/mol; Mw/Mn=2.4; II=96.0%; niso=62; M.p.=150° C.; ΔHmelt32 104 J/g.
Example 1 was repeated, but 19.5 mg (0.04 mmol) of the metallocene were employed, and the polymerization temperature was 50° C.
The activity of the metallocene was 18.8 kg of PP/g of metallocene×h.
VN=72 cm3/g; Mw=64 750 g/mol; Mw/Mn=2.1; II=96.0%; niso=64; M.p.=154° C.; ΔHmelt=109.5 J/g.
Example 1 was repeated, but 58.0 mg (0.12 mmol) of the metallocene were used and the polymerization temperature was 30° C.
The activity of the metallocene was 9.7 kg of PP/g of metallocene×h.
VN=152 cm3/g; Mw=171 000 g/mol; Mw/Mn=2.2; II=99.9%; niso=>500; M.p.=160° C.; ΔHmelt=103 J/g.
Comparative Examples A-H
Examples 1 to 3 were repeated, but the metallocenes dimethylsilyl(2-Me-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride (metallocene 1), dimethylsilyl(4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride (metallocene 2) and dimethylsilyl(1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride (metallocene 3) were used.
Comparison of Comparative Examples F/G with D/E confirms the positive effect of the 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroindenyl ligand compared with indenyl, and Comparative Examples F/G/H compared with A/B/C show the positive effect of the substitution in the 2-position of the indenyl ligand.
In comparison with Examples 1 to 3, however, only the combination of substitution in the 2-position together with the tetrahydroindenyl system results in very high melting points and heats of melting and thus in high crystallinity and hardness of the polymers.
Example 1 was repeated, but 6.8 mg (0.015 mmol) of ethylene(2-Me-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride were employed.
The metallocene activity was 72.5 kg of PP/g of metallocene×h.
VN=35 cm3/g; Mw=20 750 g/mol; Mw/Mn=1.9; II=94.5%; niso=34; M.p.=141° C.; ΔHmelt=92.4 J/g.
Example 4 was repeated, but 28.1 mg (0.062 mmol) of the metallocene were used and the polymerization temperature was 50° C.
The metallocene activity was 28.5 kg of PP/g of metallocene×h.
VN=51 cm3/g; Mw=28 200 g/mol; Mw/Mn=2.2; II=94.8%; niso=35; M.p.=143° C.; ΔHmelt=97.9 J/g.
Example 4 was repeated, but 50 mg (0.110 mmol) of the metallocene were used and the polymerization temperature was 30° C.
The metallocene activity was 10.9 kg of PP/g of metallocene×h.
VN=92 cm3/g; Mw=93 800 g/mol; Mw/Mn=2.2; II=95.5%; niso=48; M.p.=151° C.; ΔHmelt=99.0 J/g.
Comparative Example I-O
Examples 4 to 6 were repeated, but the metallocenes ethylene(1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride (metallocene 4) and ethylene(2-Me-1-indenyl)2zirconium dichloride (metallocene 5) were used.
Comparison of Comparative Examples I to O with Examples 4 to 6 confirms the effect of the substitution in the 2-position together with the use of the tetrahydroindenyl system. niso melting point and heat of melting are significantly higher in each of Examples 4-6, and the crystallinity and hardness of the polymers are thus also significantly improved.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4035884 | Nov 1990 | DE | national |
This application is a voluntary division under 37 C.F.R. 1.177 of copending reissue application Ser. No. 08/324,260, filed Oct. 17, 1994, now Re 37,208 E, and copending reissue application Ser. No. 08/895,950 both of which are reissues of U.S. Pat. No. 5,276,208 (application Ser. No. 07/789,361, filed Nov. 8, 1991).
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3192276 | Fritz | Jun 1965 | A |
| 4769510 | Kaminsky et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4871705 | Hoel | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4892851 | Ewen et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4931417 | Miya et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 5017714 | Welborn, Jr. | May 1991 | A |
| 5087677 | Brekner et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5103030 | Rohrmann et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5145819 | Winter et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5243001 | Winter et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5276208 | Winter et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5278264 | Spaleck et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5296434 | Karl et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5324800 | Welborn, Jr. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5329033 | Spaleck et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5561093 | Fujita | Oct 1996 | A |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 284 708 | Oct 1988 | DE |
| 37 26 067 | Feb 1989 | DE |
| 3826075 | Feb 1990 | DE |
| 4 035 886 | Nov 1990 | DE |
| 40 35 886 | Nov 1990 | DE |
| 4 128 238 | Aug 1991 | DE |
| 41 28 238 | Aug 1991 | DE |
| 0 129 368 | Dec 1984 | EP |
| 0 185 918 | Jul 1985 | EP |
| 0 316 155 | May 1989 | EP |
| 0 320 762 | Jun 1989 | EP |
| 0 336 128 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0 344 887 | Dec 1989 | EP |
| 0 347 129 | Dec 1989 | EP |
| 0 351 392 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0 355 289 | Feb 1990 | EP |
| 0 366 290 | May 1990 | EP |
| 0 407 870 | Jan 1991 | EP |
| 0 426 643 | May 1991 | EP |
| 0 433 990 | Jun 1991 | EP |
| 442 725 | Aug 1991 | EP |
| 0 485 821 | May 1992 | EP |
| 0 485 823 | May 1992 | EP |
| 0 500 005 | Aug 1992 | EP |
| 0 529 908 | Mar 1993 | EP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 08324260 | Oct 1994 | US |
| Child | 07789361 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 07789361 | Nov 1991 | US |
| Child | 08895909 | US |
