Metasurfaces for laser speckle reduction

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12140778
  • Patent Number
    12,140,778
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 2, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 12, 2024
    2 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • Metalenz, Inc. (Boston, MA, US)
  • Examiners
    • Petkovsek; Daniel
    Agents
    • KPPB LLP
Abstract
An apparatus that relies on patterned metasurfaces to reduce speckle when illuminating an object with coherent light. The metasurfaces serve to increase one or more of angle diversity and wavelength diversity resulting from illumination by a coherent source.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The invention relates to illumination and in particular to illumination with lasers.


BACKGROUND

Many applications rely on illumination of scenes, either with structured light, flood illumination, or engineered illumination patterns. Such illumination is useful when the reflected light is to be processed in some way, for example in three-dimensional sensing, or when carrying out further processing steps on a two-dimensional image.


Correct illumination is particularly important in machine vision systems. In such systems, knowledge of the exact structure, texture, and contrast of an illuminated structure is important in subsequent processing of the article that is being inspected by the machine vision system.


Because of its low cost, narrow output beam, narrow bandwidth, and high levels of illumination, a commonly used device for such illumination a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser, or “VCSEL.”


Like most lasers, a VCSEL outputs coherent light. This poses a difficulty when illuminating rough surfaces. Such surfaces cause reflections that can interfere with the illumination beam. This leads to a random pattern with large variations in signal intensity over a small area. Such a pattern is usually referred to as “speckle.”


Speckle negatively impacts the accuracy of any algorithms that processes data representative of an image.


SUMMARY

Speckle can be suppressed by promoting diversity of illumination. Examples include increasing the number of incident angles from which light illuminates the scene, increasing the number of wavelengths used to illuminate the scene, increasing the number of different polarizations used to illuminate the scene, and changing the pattern of light during the course of illumination and subsequent recording or imaging. These forms of diversity are referred to herein as angular diversity, wavelength diversity, polarization diversity, and temporal diversity.


The apparatus and methods described herein rely at least in part on a metasurface in connection with suppressing the formation of speckle using one or more of the aforementioned techniques.


In one aspect, the invention features a metasurface-enabled illuminator that replicates an illumination source across an illumination aperture via a light bar. This embodiment increases angular diversity by reducing spatial coherence.


In another aspect, the invention features a metasurface-enabled design diversifies the output wavelengths of VCSELs in a single VCSEL array individually, thereby increasing wavelength diversity.


In yet another aspect, the invention features an optical element that expands an image of a VCSEL array on another optical element to increase spatial incoherence and angular diversity.


A suitable optical element for functioning as a metasurface comprises a diffusing element that is robust to both placement and assembly error and that forms an ensemble metasurface. A typical metasurface includes nanostructures embedded in a medium with the nanostructures having an index of refraction that differs from that of the medium so as to function as diffracting centers.


In one aspect, the invention features an illumination system for illuminating an object. Such a system includes illumination source, a coupler, a light bar, and a patterned metasurface. The coupler couples light from the illumination source into the light bar. After having undergone total internal reflection within the light bar and after having interacted with the patterned metasurface, the light exits the light bar and propagates toward the object.


In some embodiments, the metasurface is patterned on a surface of the light bar. Embodiments include those in which it is patterned on a top surface and those in which it is patterned on a bottom surface. The top and bottom surface are closest and furthest respectively from an object to be illuminated.


Embodiments include those in which the patterned metasurface includes nanostructures of uniform height. These nanostructures are embedded in a medium. At the wavelength being used, the nanostructures have a higher refractive index than the medium in which they are embedded. Among these are embodiments in which the nanostructures have a refractive index greater than two at the wavelength, those in which the medium is air, and those in which the medium has an index of refraction that is less than two at the wavelength.


Further embodiments include those in which light from the illumination source is replicated at multiple diffraction locations along the patterned metasurface. Among these are embodiments in which the replicas are separated by distances greater than a coherence length of the illumination source and those in which the replicas are incoherent.


In some embodiments, light from the illumination source forms replicas that are on a top surface of the light bar, as a result of which light is diffracted upon incidence and redirected into free space. Others form replicas that are on a bottom surface of the light bar. In such cases, light incident on the bottom surface becomes diffracted as a result of interaction with the patterned metasurface, thus causing the light to no longer be totally internally reflected within the light bar and to thus be redirected into free space.


In other embodiments, the light bar's effective aperture is equal to its exposed surface.


In other embodiments, the light bar causes diversity of illumination on the object to be greater than it would have been had the object been directly illuminated without the light bar.


In other embodiments, the light bar causes speckle on the object to be less than it would have been had the object been directly illuminated without the light bar. In particular, the speckle's contrast decreases.


Embodiments further include those in which the patterned metasurface is partially reflective and partially transmissive as well as those in which the patterned metasurface has a non-zero reflection coefficient and a non-unity diffraction into a desired order.


Also among the embodiments are those in which an air gap separates the patterned metasurface from the light bar. In some embodiments, the air gap is constant. But in others, it is variable. In a particular embodiment, the air gap varies linearly.


In another aspect, the invention features an illumination system for illuminating an object. Such a system includes a VCSEL array having a design wavelength for output light. The VCSEL array comprises lasers and a patterned metasurface. The patterned metasurface causes variations in output wavelengths of the each of the lasers from the design wavelength. As a result, the lasers output light at different wavelengths.


In some embodiments, the patterned metasurface causes light output by the lasers to vary from the design wavelength by more than twenty nanometers.


Embodiments further include those in which patterned metasurface comprises first and second layers. Among these are embodiments in which the first layer is transmissive at the design wavelength and the second layer imparts different phase shifts to different lasers. Also among these embodiments are those in which the second layer is a reflective layer having a reflectivity in excess of 90% at the design wavelength, those in which the second layer is a dielectric mirror and the first layer is a metasurface that imparts a different phase shifts for different lasers, those in which the second layer is reflective over all of the different wavelengths, and those in which the first and second layers are separated by a material of uniform thickness and having a low refractive index.


In some embodiments, the patterned metasurface comprises nanostructures with uniform height and a first refractive index. The nanostructures are surrounded by a medium with a second refractive index. The first refractive index exceeds the second refractive index. Among these are embodiments in which the first refractive index is at least two and those in which the patterned metasurface has a duty cycle as a parameter. In these embodiments, the range of phase shifts introduced by changing the duty cycle generates a corresponding range of emission wavelengths.


In another aspect, the invention features an illumination system for illuminating an object. The illumination system includes a VCSEL array and a replicating layer. The array comprises a plurality of sources, each of which is a VCSEL. The sources emit light at different wavelengths. The replicating layer, which is disposed above the array, forms a plurality of synthetic sources for each source. These synthetic sources are incoherent relative to each other.


In some embodiments, the replicating layer comprises a diffraction grating.


In other embodiments, the replicating layer comprises a patterned metasurface. Among these are embodiments in which the metasurface is configured to both diffract light to form the synthetic sources and to shape beams from the synthetic sources.


In another aspect, the invention features an apparatus comprising a diffuser that has patches. Each patch comprises a metasurface. Each metasurface comprises nanostructures embedded in a medium. The nanostructures have a refractive index that is greater than that of the medium. Each metasurface carries out a different optical function.


Embodiments include those in which the patches are arranged at random and those in which they an ordered arrangement.


Embodiments further include those in which the patches carry out any two functions selected from the group consisting of beam steering, beam shaping, collimating, and functioning as a lens.


Further embodiments include those in which illuminating light is incident on a set of patches and in which the set of patches carries out a function on the illuminating light. This function is an average of functions carried out by individual patches in the set.


Further embodiments include those in which each of the patches has a rectangular boundary and those in which each of the patches has a boundary that is based on a Voronoi cell.


Still other embodiments include those in which the patches have random boundaries, those in which they have quasi-random boundaries, and those in which they define an ordered tiling.


As used herein, the terms “metasurface” and “metalayer” are used interchangeably. In either case, the term refers to a region of dielectric that includes a distribution of dielectric nanoparticles that have been strategically sized and placed so as to interact with light in particular ways. By way of analogy, prescription spectacles worn by humans interact with light in particular ways to achieve a desired distribution of light at the retina. They do so primarily as a result of their shape. A metasurface or metalayer can be thought of as a prescription spectacle that uses its distribution of nanoparticles rather than its overall shape in order to do the same thing.


These and other features of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying figures, in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows an illumination system;



FIG. 2 shows a plan view of the illumination system of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 shows configurations of patterned metasurfaces on the illumination system of FIGS. 1 and 2;



FIG. 4 shows additional configurations of patterned metasurfaces on the illumination system of FIGS. 1 and 2;



FIG. 5 is a table showing illumination ripple as a result of different configurations of illumination sources with and without light bars of the type shown in FIGS. 1 and 2;



FIG. 6 shows the use of patterned metasurfaces to generate wavelength diversity in a VCSEL array;



FIG. 7 is a table showing exemplary variations in output wavelength using the patterned metasurfaces of FIG. 6;



FIG. 8 shows exemplary wavelength distributions across VCSEL arrays implemented by the patterned metasurfaces of FIG. 6;



FIG. 9 shows a replicating layer for replicating sources to create spatially incoherent synthetic sources;



FIG. 10 shows embodiments of the light bar of FIG. 1;



FIG. 11 shows a patchwork diffuser in which each patch is a metasurface; and



FIG. 12 shows an illumination system that incorporates multiple ones of the foregoing features.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows an illumination system 10 in which a light bar 12 extends along a longitudinal axis 14 from a first end 16 to a second end 18. In the illustrated embodiment, the light bar 12 has a rectangular cross section that defines four surfaces extending along the longitudinal axis. Among these is an illuminating surface 20 having a row of patterned metasurfaces 22, each of which defines a diffraction site 24. In operation, at least some light exits the light bar 12 through each of the diffraction sites 24 and travels towards an object 26 that is to be illuminated. The illustrated embodiment shows discrete patterned metasurfaces 22. However, an alternative embodiment features a metasurface 22 that extends along the illumination surface 20 of the light bar 12 and has discrete regions for each diffraction site 24.


The light bar 12 comprises a dielectric medium, such as glass. However, in some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 10, the light bar 12 is formed on a compliant polymer. This permits the light bar 12 to be wrapped around surfaces.


A coupler 28 at the first end 12 couples light from a VCSEL into the light bar 10 so that the light enters at an angle that causes it to undergo total internal reflection as it propagates through the light bar 12 towards the second end. A suitable coupler 28 is a prism, a mirror, or a diffracting surface. In some embodiments, the coupler 28 also collimates or otherwise initially processes the light from the VCSEL before it enters the light bar 12. In such cases, the coupler 28 carries out collimation using a metasurface, a lens sub-assembly, or a mirror facet/prism system.


As the light from the VCSEL propagates through the light bar 12, it undergoes total internal reflection. As a result, the light falls on each of the patterned metasurfaces 22. This results in a sequence of replica images 30 of an original image 32 provided by the coupler 28, as shown in the plan view in FIG. 2. The number of such replicas 30 and the spacing between them depends on the particular wave mode.


In any case, whenever light associated with a replica 30 is incident on one of these diffraction sites 24, some of it radiates into free space and the rest of it reflects back into the light bar 12 to continue its journey along the axis 14. The light that radiates into free space at the diffraction sites 24 is the light that ultimately illuminates the object.


Each patterned metasurface 30 processes light as it exists though that diffraction site 24 in an effort to reduce speckling at the object 26. The patterned metasurface 22 at a diffraction site 24 need not the same as patterned metasurfaces 22 at other diffraction sites 24.


The patterned metasurface 22 diffracts at least some but not all of the energy carried by that mode into free space so that it is available for illuminating the object 26. Each patterned metasurface 22 thus functions as an independent light source that directs light towards the object 26 that is to be illuminated.


The presence of the patterned metasurface 22 offers certain advantages.


First, the patterned metasurface 22 is able to shape the beam so that light illuminates the object 26 according to a desired pattern. Thus, if even illumination is desired, the patterned metasurface 22 can compensate for what would otherwise by an uneven illumination pattern from a light bar 12 without a patterned metasurface 22.


Second, the distance between successive diffraction sites 24 can be selected to be longer than the coherence length of the VCSELs. This incoherent illumination reduces the likelihood of speckle.


Additionally, light enters free space via a diffraction event. This eliminates any zero-order mode while also improving eye safety.


The coherence length for light propagating in a medium with index of refraction n determined with the formula. wavelength λ, and bandwidth Δλ is given by:









L
=



2


ln

(
2
)



π

n





λ
2


Δ

λ







(
2
)







In the case of a VCSEL that provides 940-nanometer light with a 1-nanometer bandwidth, with the light passing through glass having an index of 1.45, the coherence length is approximately 270 micrometers. By positioning the diffraction sites 24 along the light bar 12 at distances greater than this coherence length, it becomes possible to reduce the contrast associated with any speckle seen on the object 26. The extent to which this contrast is reduced will depend on the number of incoherent replica images 30 that exist along the light bar 12. In particular, the contrast will decrease by a factor equal to the square root of the number of such replica images 30.


Though not required, it is useful to provide a mirror 34 at the second end 18. This will permit light that did not exit the light bar 12. However, it is also possible, through suitable design of the patterned metasurfaces 22, to ensure that essentially all light will be coupled out of the light bar.



FIG. 3 illustrates examples of how to engineer the metasurface 22 at the light bar's top layer. The upper row shows transverse and longitudinal views of a phase gradient across the metasurface 22. Such a phase gradient permits light to be collimated upon exit, to create an illumination pattern, or to reproduce a pattern of dots, as is the case in structured light applications.



FIG. 4 shows implementations of partially-diffracting metasurfaces 22. The top row of FIG. 4 shows two placements of a metasurface layer 36. In the left-hand panel of the top row, the light that ultimately illuminates the object 26 does so after having been transmitted through the metasurface layer 36. In contrast, in the right-hand panel of the top row, the light that ultimately illuminates the object 26 does so after having been reflected off the metasurface layer 36.


The bottom row of FIG. 4 shows a metasurface layer 36 having reflectivity that varies as a function of position along the light bar's longitudinal axis. This permits the metasurface layer 36 to have a reflectivity that decreases monotonically towards the light bar's second end 18. A spatially-varying reflectivity of this form yields more uniform illumination along the light bar 12. In this embodiment, the variation in reflectivity comes from using frustrated total internal reflection to create a partially-reflective mirror.


In the left-hand embodiment, the reflection remains constant along the length. However, in the right-hand embodiment, the reflection coefficient changes exponentially as a result of a linearly decreasing air gap 38 between the light bar 12 and the top metasurface layer 36. Due to the phenomenon of frustrated total internal reflection, the leakage, which results in transmission into the metasurface layer 36, increases exponentially. FIGS. 3 and 4 thus illustrate how to engineer partially-reflective metasurfaces on the illuminating surface of the light bar 12 as well how to engineer the reflection to provide an exponential drop off of reflectance as the light propagates further from the source. This results in a more uniform illumination of the object 26.



FIG. 5 is a table showing the reduction in the speckle contrast associated with speckled illumination when using a light bar 12 as described herein. The speckle contrast that results from illumination by a single VCSEL with no light bar 12 is arbitrarily selected to be 100% as a baseline value. It can be seen that adding a small light bar to a single voxel reduces this contrast to 22% of what it originally was.



FIG. 6 shows a configuration that achieves wavelength diversity with an array of VCSEL lasers as an illumination source.


In general, the lasers that comprise an array of VCSELs are manufactured together in the same process using the same die. As such, the wavelengths emitted by each laser will be identical. This lack of variation between lasers is often considered a desirable feature. However, it does have the disadvantage of promoting speckling on an illuminated object.


In an effort to introduce wavelength diversity, it is necessary to avoid this lack of manufacturing variability. This is achieved by using a patterned metasurface to cause different lasers in the same VCSEL array to resonate and emit at slightly different wavelengths.



FIG. 6 shows first and second lasers 40, 42 from the VCSEL array 38. Each laser 40, 42 features a quantum well 44. The quantum well 44 lies on top of a distributed Bragg reflector 46. A conventional laser would have another distributed Bragg reflector on the other side of the quantum well 44. However, in FIG. 6, this has been replaced by a patterned metasurface 50. The patterned metasurface 50 has unit cells that are smaller than a wavelength. The laser's aperture 48 is thus filled with identical unit cells. As a result, there is no phase shift across the aperture 48.


The patterned metasurface 50 or another distributed Bragg reflector reflects light back towards the quantum well 44. However, the patterned metasurface 40 also imparts a phase shift to this light. This phase shift changes the effective length of the laser's cavity, and hence its resonance. As a result, the phase shift perturbs the laser's output wavelength. By using slightly different patterned metasurfaces 50 on different lasers 40, 42, it is possible to perturb the wavelength output by each laser 40, 42. This results in wavelength diversity, which in turn reduces speckle.


The patterned metasurface 50 is typically a dielectric layer that has been etched to form sub-wavelength nanostructures. Suitable materials for use in the dielectric layer include silicon, gallium arsenide, indium gallium arsenide, or materials conventionally used in VCSEL manufacture.


In some embodiments, the patterned metasurface 50 has only a single layer. In these embodiments, both reflection and phase shifting occur within that single layer. Other embodiments, as shown in FIG. 6, includes first and second metasurface layers 52, 54, each of which is approximately a wavelength thick.


In this second embodiment, the first metasurface layer 52 is mostly transmissive. This first metasurface layer 52 imparts a phase shift onto incident light. The second metasurface layer 54 has high reflectivity and thus acts as a mirror.


Having the patterned metasurface 50 as part of the laser 40, 42 means that the laser's output wavelengths can be defined in a final lithographic step while retaining the same remaining structure of the laser across all lasers in the array.


The phase shift perturbs the laser's output wavelength by changing its effective cavity length. This effective cavity length is given by the sum of the cavity's nominal length L and an additional length that results from summing the various phase shifts that occur:







L
eff

=

L
+


λ

2

π




(


δφ
1

+


δφ
2

/
2

+


δφ
DBR

/
2


)








where:

    • Leff is the effective cavity length,
    • L is the nominal length of the cavity,
    • λ is the design wavelength,
    • δφ1 is the phase shift imparted by the first metasurface layer 52,
    • δφ2 is the phase shift imparted by the second metasurface layer 54 during reflection, and
    • δφDBR is the phase shift imparted by the distributed Bragg reflector 46 during reflection.


      The output wavelength of the laser 40, 42 is then given by the cavity resonance condition:

      mλ=2nLeff(λ),m∈custom character

      where n is the group index of the VCSEL structure averaged over the cavity and m is an integer representing the number of integral wavelengths that fit in the cavity. As a result, the output wavelength of the laser 40, 42 can be arbitrarily chosen so long as it remains reflected by the mirror metasurface. This output wavelength is given by:







λ
=


2

n

L


m
-


n

(


δφ
1

+


δφ
2

/
2

+


δφ
DBR

/
2


)

/
π




,

m







VCSELs are short-cavity lasers. This means that m is small. Therefore, a large range of wavelengths can be covered by suitably engineering the patterned metasurface.


As shown in the exemplary calculations in FIG. 7, it is possible to use this phase shift to vary the output wavelength of even modestly-sized cavities by a significant amount. As an additional benefit, it is also possible to suppress undesired lasing modes. This can be done by overlapping the designed emission wavelength with an appropriate reflecting metasurface designed for that wavelength.


A useful definition of speckle contrast is the ratio of the standard deviation of the intensity of a speckled field with its mean intensity, C=σX/X). Using the foregoing definition, the reduction of speckle contrast gained by this type of construction can be quantified by the following equation:

C=[1+2π2v/v)2h/λ)2(cos θo+cos θi)2]−1/4

Where:

    • C is the speckle contrast,
    • v, λ are the illumination center frequency and wavelength, respectively,
    • δv is the illumination bandwidth (assuming a gaussian intensity distribution),
    • σh is the illuminated surface root mean square roughness, and
    • θo, θi are the output ray angle and input ray angle, respectively, with respect to the surface.


It is apparent from inspection that contrast C goes as C˜δv−1/2. Therefore, increasing the illumination bandwidth by a factor of nine, which would be the roughly equivalent of using an LED instead of a VCSEL, would decrease the contrast by a factor of three. Gains may be larger than the above theoretical prediction in an actual system.


In certain applications, it may be beneficial to impart an additional phase gradient to the metasurface to spread out, diffract, or steer light exiting the VCSEL.



FIG. 8 shows a first VCSEL array 56 and a second VCSEL array 58. Each array has first and second lasers 60, 62 that output light at corresponding first and second wavelengths. The difference between the first and second wavelength is smaller than the difference between the first wavelength and any other wavelength that comes from the array 56, 58.


In the first array 56, the lasers are grouped by wavelength so that the first and second lasers 60, 62 are neighbors. This results in a wavelength gradient across the first array 56. In the second array 58. the first and second lasers 60, 62 are no longer neighbors.


It is apparent from FIG. 8 that by appropriately manufacturing the metalayer, it is possible to create arbitrary distributions of wavelength sources across the array 56, 58.


The creation of wavelength diversity described in connection with FIG. 6 comes at the cost of angular diversity. For a given wavelength, the object 26 will be illuminated by fewer lasers.



FIG. 9 alleviates this difficulty by passing the beams of the lasers 40 through a replicating layer 64. The replicating layer 64 effectively replicates each beam. The replicated beams will then act as different sources that illuminate the object 26 with light that is incident from different angles. This promotes angular diversity.


In some embodiments, the replicating layer 64 includes a diffraction grating that replicates each beam into multiple diffraction orders or angles. In other embodiments, the replicating layer 64 comprises another patterned metasurface. In the latter case, the patterned metasurface can be configured to both diffract and collimate. Additionally, the patterned metasurface can have different patterns at different locations 66 so as to optimize for the particular laser 40 that is being used to illuminate that location.


The height of the replicating layer 64 exceeds a minimum height so as to ensure destruction of coherence between the spatially separate replicated beams. In other words, by using the low temporal coherence of the individual VCSELs, it is possible to destroy spatial coherence for the spatially separated beams that emerge from the replication layer 64. This follows from the equation:









L
=



2

ln


(
2
)



π

n





λ
2


Δ

λ







(
2
)








where:

    • Lis the coherence length,
    • nis the refractive index of the medium through which the light propagates,
    • λis the illumination wavelength, and
    • Δλis the bandwidth of the illumination.


So long as the path length difference between two beams that diffract from the same point and that fall on the object 26 is longer than L, which is a function of the thickness of the replicating layer 64 as well as the angle of diffraction, the replicated beams will be mutually incoherent.


By repeating this process across the array 38, the lasers 40 can in effect be replicated into synthetic sources. The light from these replications fills a large spatial extent at the object 26. This reduces speckle by increasing the angular diversity of the illuminated scene.


The replicating layer 64, whether it takes the form of a diffraction grating or another patterned metasurface, can be tailored to function for each laser 40 or set of lasers 40 independently by changing the nanostructure of that metasurface or grating, and tuning it to exhibit maximum design efficiency for the wavelength of the particular laser that is illuminating it that portion of thee replicating layer 64. A metasurface design can also include beam shaping capability integrated with the diffraction grating.


An optional diffuser provides more even illumination. In some cases, a diffuser is a refractive diffuser in which small lenses have been distributed, either statistically or according to some design, so as to focus or collimate light in different patterns. In such diffusers, it is possible to control the distribution of sizes and radii of curvature for the lenses so as to achieve some desired intensity distribution of illumination.


However, such diffusers are limited by the forms that these lenses can take. As a practical matter, these lenses are simple spherical lenses. Hence, the number of degrees of freedom is limited to radius of curvature and size. Only when the ensemble of the far field distribution of the micro-lens elements comes together in the far field will a custom intensity distribution be formed.


An alternative approach is to form the diffuser from an ensemble of metasurfaces. In such cases, the design is not constrained by the need to rely on spherical lenses. As such, these metasurfaces can be configured to carry out different functions.



FIG. 11 shows a plan view of a diffuser 66 made by patches 68, each of which is a different metasurface having a different arrangement of scattering elements. Although the patches 68 shown are rectangular, this is only by way of illustration. Each patch 68 is typically multiple wavelengths in size.


In some embodiments, some patches 68 carry out beam steering functions. In such embodiments, each patch 68 steers the beam into a certain angle. A far-field intensity profile can then be reproduced by specifying the appropriate distribution of phase profiles for each subcomponent.


A particular source 40, after having been replicated by the replication layer 64, may illuminate several patches 68. As shown in the expanded view, first and second patches 70, 72 may have substantially different designs. In the example shown, the first patch 70 shows a design for a blazed-grating and the second patch 72 shows a design for a diverging lens.


The metasurfaces 74 shown in the first and second patches 70, 72 are circular in form. However, other embodiments feature metasurfaces that are elliptical, rectangular, triangular, polygonal, described by a parametric curve, or described by a Bezier curve.



FIG. 12 shows an illumination system that combines some of the foregoing features to reduce speckle in illumination.


The left side of FIG. 12 shows a ray path for a ray that begins at a laser 40 on a VCSEL array 38. The ray passes through a replicating layer 64 disposed above the VCSEL array 38. Shading shows targets upon which the same wavelength is incident. The replicating layer 64 replicates the rays, each of which is incident on a different metasurface patch 68 on the diffuser 66.


The right side of FIG. 12 shows the same structure as that on the left but with schematic representations of the different metsurfaces shown. The metasurface patches and the crossed grating in the illustrated replicating layer 64 are more clearly seen in the right-hand illustration. The differing nanostructures, that overlie each laser 40 and that perturb the lasers' output frequencies can also be clearly seen in the right-hand illustration in FIG. 12.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus comprising an illumination system for illuminating an object, said illumination system comprising a VCSEL array having a design wavelength for output light and a patterned metasurface comprising a first metasurface layer and a second metasurface layer, wherein the first metasurface layer is in a different plane from the second metasurface layer, wherein said VCSEL array comprises lasers each including a quantum well, wherein, for each laser, said patterned metasurface causes variations in output wavelengths from the quantum well such that each of said lasers output light at different wavelengths, and wherein the light from each laser passes through the first metasurface layer and then the second metasurface layer, and wherein the first metasurface layer is transmissive at the design wavelength and imparts a phase shift, and wherein the phase shift from the first metasurface layer differs for each laser.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said patterned metasurface causes light that is output by said lasers to be varied from said design wavelength by more than twenty nanometers.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the patterned metasurface comprises nanostructures with uniform height and a first refractive index, wherein said nanostructures are surrounded by a medium with a second refractive index, wherein said first refractive index exceeds said second refractive index.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said first refractive index is at least two.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the patterned metasurface has a duty cycle as a parameter, wherein a range of phase shifts introduced by changing said duty cycle generates a corresponding range of emission wavelengths.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said second metasurface layer has a reflectivity in excess of 90% at said design wavelength.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said second metasurface layer is a dielectric mirror.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said second metasurface layer is reflective over all of said different wavelengths.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said first metasurface layer and said second metasurface layer are separated by a material, wherein said material is of uniform thickness, wherein said material has a lower refractive index than the first metasurface layer.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is the national stage of PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/040302, entitled “Metasurfaces for Laser Speckle Reduction,” filed Jul. 2, 2019, which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/693,065, entitled “Metasurfaces for Laser Speckle Reduction”, filed Jul. 2, 2018, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2019/040302 7/2/2019 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/010084 1/9/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (334)
Number Name Date Kind
3877034 Nelson Apr 1975 A
4777116 Kawatsuki et al. Oct 1988 A
4856899 Iwaoka et al. Aug 1989 A
5085496 Yoshida et al. Feb 1992 A
5337146 Azzam Aug 1994 A
5452126 Johnson Sep 1995 A
5620792 Challener, IV Apr 1997 A
6097856 Hammond, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6731839 Bhagavatula et al. May 2004 B2
6825986 Ashkinazy et al. Nov 2004 B2
6834027 Sakaguchi et al. Dec 2004 B1
6924457 Koyama et al. Aug 2005 B2
6927922 George et al. Aug 2005 B2
7057151 Lezec et al. Jun 2006 B2
7061612 Johnston Jun 2006 B2
7061693 Zalevsky Jun 2006 B2
7171078 Sasaki et al. Jan 2007 B2
7171084 Izumi et al. Jan 2007 B2
7186969 Altendorf et al. Mar 2007 B2
7241988 Gruber et al. Jul 2007 B2
7324210 De Groot et al. Jan 2008 B2
7327468 Maznev et al. Feb 2008 B2
7402131 Mueth et al. Jul 2008 B2
7450618 Dantus et al. Nov 2008 B2
7547874 Liang Jun 2009 B2
7561264 Treado et al. Jul 2009 B2
7576899 Kanesaka et al. Aug 2009 B2
7679830 Dowski, Jr. Mar 2010 B2
7684097 Fukumoto et al. Mar 2010 B2
7773307 Shih Aug 2010 B2
7800683 Zalevsky et al. Sep 2010 B2
7812295 Zalevsky et al. Oct 2010 B2
7928900 Fuller et al. Apr 2011 B2
7929220 Sayag Apr 2011 B2
7965607 Fukumoto et al. Jun 2011 B2
8009358 Zalevsky et al. Aug 2011 B2
8040604 Zalevsky et al. Oct 2011 B2
8107705 Dowski, Jr. et al. Jan 2012 B2
8152307 Duelli et al. Apr 2012 B2
8169703 Mossberg et al. May 2012 B1
8192022 Zalevsky Jun 2012 B2
8212866 Lemmer et al. Jul 2012 B2
8318386 Kobrin Nov 2012 B2
8328396 Capasso et al. Dec 2012 B2
8351048 Millerd Jan 2013 B2
8351120 Deng et al. Jan 2013 B2
8390932 Jia et al. Mar 2013 B2
8400494 Zalevsky et al. Mar 2013 B2
8430513 Chang et al. Apr 2013 B2
8451368 Sung et al. May 2013 B2
8472797 Ok et al. Jun 2013 B2
8481948 Frach et al. Jul 2013 B2
8558873 Mceldowney Oct 2013 B2
8587474 Fuller et al. Nov 2013 B2
8649631 Islam et al. Feb 2014 B2
8681428 Brown Mar 2014 B1
8687040 Silveira Apr 2014 B2
8716677 Cui May 2014 B2
8734033 Walters et al. May 2014 B2
8743923 Geske Jun 2014 B2
8816460 Kalevo et al. Aug 2014 B2
8848273 Yu et al. Sep 2014 B2
8876289 Dorronsoro Diaz et al. Nov 2014 B2
8908149 Freimann Dec 2014 B2
8912973 Werner et al. Dec 2014 B2
8981337 Burckel et al. Mar 2015 B1
9007451 Rogers et al. Apr 2015 B2
9116302 Mccarthy et al. Aug 2015 B2
9151891 Ma et al. Oct 2015 B2
9212899 Johnson et al. Dec 2015 B2
9298060 Shen et al. Mar 2016 B2
9309274 Van Der B. et al. Apr 2016 B2
9310535 Greiner et al. Apr 2016 B1
9329484 Markle et al. May 2016 B1
9330704 Nishimura et al. May 2016 B2
9367036 Pyun et al. Jun 2016 B2
9369621 Malone et al. Jun 2016 B2
9391700 Bruce et al. Jul 2016 B1
9392153 Myhre et al. Jul 2016 B2
9411103 Astratov Aug 2016 B2
9482796 Arbabi et al. Nov 2016 B2
9500771 Liu et al. Nov 2016 B2
9553423 Chen et al. Jan 2017 B2
9557585 Yap et al. Jan 2017 B1
9606415 Zheludev et al. Mar 2017 B2
9609190 Lee et al. Mar 2017 B2
9739918 Arbabi et al. Aug 2017 B2
9766463 Border et al. Sep 2017 B2
9778404 Divliansky et al. Oct 2017 B2
9825074 Tian et al. Nov 2017 B2
9829700 Parent et al. Nov 2017 B2
9835870 Astratov et al. Dec 2017 B2
9836122 Border Dec 2017 B2
9869580 Grossinger et al. Jan 2018 B2
9880377 Safrani et al. Jan 2018 B1
9885859 Harris Feb 2018 B2
9891393 Reece Feb 2018 B2
9939129 Byrnes et al. Apr 2018 B2
9947118 Khare et al. Apr 2018 B2
9952096 Kats et al. Apr 2018 B2
9958251 Brock et al. May 2018 B1
9967541 Piestun May 2018 B2
9978801 Park et al. May 2018 B2
9989680 Arbabi et al. Jun 2018 B2
9992474 Grunnet-Jepsen et al. Jun 2018 B2
9995859 Kamali et al. Jun 2018 B2
9995930 Arbabi et al. Jun 2018 B2
10007118 Border Jun 2018 B2
10054859 Ye et al. Aug 2018 B2
10084239 Shaver et al. Sep 2018 B2
10108085 Peters et al. Oct 2018 B2
10126466 Lin et al. Nov 2018 B2
10132465 Byrnes et al. Nov 2018 B2
10149612 Muyo et al. Dec 2018 B2
10155846 Fuji et al. Dec 2018 B2
10234383 Wang et al. Mar 2019 B2
10254454 Klug et al. Apr 2019 B2
10267957 Kamali et al. Apr 2019 B2
10310148 Stewart et al. Jun 2019 B2
10310387 Palmer et al. Jun 2019 B2
10315951 Toussaint et al. Jun 2019 B2
10317667 Waller et al. Jun 2019 B2
10324314 Czaplewski et al. Jun 2019 B2
10338275 Acosta et al. Jul 2019 B1
10341640 Shechtman et al. Jul 2019 B2
10345246 Tian et al. Jul 2019 B2
10345519 Miller et al. Jul 2019 B1
10365416 Zhan et al. Jul 2019 B2
10371936 Didomenico Aug 2019 B2
10386620 Astratov et al. Aug 2019 B2
10402993 Han et al. Sep 2019 B2
10408416 Khorasaninejad et al. Sep 2019 B2
10408419 Aieta et al. Sep 2019 B2
10416565 Ahmed et al. Sep 2019 B2
10435814 Plummer et al. Oct 2019 B2
10440244 Rosenblatt et al. Oct 2019 B2
10440300 Rephaeli et al. Oct 2019 B2
10466394 Lin et al. Nov 2019 B2
10468447 Akselrod et al. Nov 2019 B2
10514296 Han et al. Dec 2019 B2
10527832 Schwab et al. Jan 2020 B2
10527851 Lin et al. Jan 2020 B2
10536688 Haas et al. Jan 2020 B2
10539723 Iazikov et al. Jan 2020 B2
10545323 Schwab et al. Jan 2020 B2
10591643 Lin et al. Mar 2020 B2
10670782 Arbabi et al. Jun 2020 B2
10725290 Fan et al. Jul 2020 B2
10795168 Riley, Jr. Oct 2020 B2
10816704 Arbabi et al. Oct 2020 B2
10816815 Aieta et al. Oct 2020 B2
11092717 Capasso et al. Aug 2021 B2
11231544 Lin et al. Jan 2022 B2
11298052 Palikaras et al. Apr 2022 B2
11353626 You Jun 2022 B2
11385516 Didomenico Jul 2022 B2
11579456 Riley et al. Feb 2023 B2
11835680 Groever et al. Dec 2023 B2
11978752 Devlin et al. May 2024 B2
20020048727 Zhou et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020118903 Cottrell et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020181126 Nishioka Dec 2002 A1
20030107787 Bablumyan Jun 2003 A1
20040173738 Mizuno Sep 2004 A1
20040184752 Aoki et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040190116 Lezec et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040258128 Johs et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050151698 Mohamadi Jul 2005 A1
20050161589 Kim et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050211665 Gao et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050220162 Nakamura Oct 2005 A1
20050239003 Chiodini et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060042322 Mendoza et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060127829 Deng et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070026585 Wong et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070273957 Zalevsky et al. Nov 2007 A1
20090135086 Fuller et al. May 2009 A1
20090230333 Eleftheriades Sep 2009 A1
20090296223 Werner et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100033701 Lee et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100055621 Hatakeyama et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100110430 Ebbesen et al. May 2010 A1
20100134869 Bernet et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100177164 Zalevsky et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100187658 Wei Jul 2010 A1
20100226134 Capasso et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100232017 Mccarthy et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100255428 Chen et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100259804 Buschbeck et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110012807 Sorvala Jan 2011 A1
20110019180 Kruglick Jan 2011 A1
20110149251 Duelli Jun 2011 A1
20110187577 Fuller et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120140235 Lee et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120258407 Sirat Oct 2012 A1
20120293854 Zheludev et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120327666 Liu et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120328240 Ma et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130016030 Liu et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130037873 Suzuki et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130050285 Takahashi et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130058071 Ben Mar 2013 A1
20130194787 Geske et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130208332 Yu et al. Aug 2013 A1
20140043846 Yang et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140085693 Mosallaei et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140210835 Hong et al. Jul 2014 A1
20150017466 Ayon et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150018500 Gerber et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150055745 Holzner et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150090862 Matsui et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150092139 Eguchi Apr 2015 A1
20150098002 Wang Apr 2015 A1
20150116721 Kats et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150219806 Arbabi et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150241608 Shian et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150316717 Astratov Nov 2015 A1
20160025914 Brongersma et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160037146 Mcgrew Feb 2016 A1
20160077261 Arbabi et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160133762 Blasco et al. May 2016 A1
20160161826 Shen et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160195705 Betzig et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160254638 Chen et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160276979 Shaver et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160299337 Arbabi et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160299426 Gates et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160306079 Arbabi et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160306157 Rho et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160318067 Banerjee et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160331457 Varghese et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160341859 Shvets et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160359235 Driscoll et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160361002 Palikaras et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160370568 Toussaint et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170003169 Shaltout et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170010466 Klug et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170030773 Han et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170038574 Zhuang et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170045652 Arbabi et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170082263 Byrnes et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170090221 Atwater Mar 2017 A1
20170121843 Plummer et al. May 2017 A1
20170125911 Alu et al. May 2017 A1
20170131460 Lin et al. May 2017 A1
20170146806 Lin et al. May 2017 A1
20170176758 Lerner et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170186166 Grunnet-Jepsen et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170201658 Rosenblatt et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170212285 Arbabi et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170235162 Shaltout Aug 2017 A1
20170250577 Ho et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170293141 Schowengerdt et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170299784 Mikkelsen et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170310907 Wang Oct 2017 A1
20170329201 Arnold Nov 2017 A1
20170374352 Horesh Dec 2017 A1
20180035101 Osterhout Feb 2018 A1
20180044234 Hokansson et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180045953 Fan et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180052276 Klienman et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180052320 Curtis et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180107015 Dümpelmann et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180129866 Hicks et al. May 2018 A1
20180172988 Ahmed et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180216797 Khorasaninejad et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180217395 Lin et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180231700 Ahmed et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180236596 Ihlemann et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180246262 Zhan et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180248268 Shvets et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180252857 Glik et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180259700 Khorasaninejad et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180259757 Urzhumov Sep 2018 A1
20180267605 Border Sep 2018 A1
20180274750 Byrnes et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180292644 Kamali et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180299595 Arbabi et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180314130 Joo et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180341090 Devlin et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180364158 Wang et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190003892 Aieta et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190025463 She et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190025477 She et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190041642 Haddick et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190041736 Grunnet-Jepsen et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190044003 Heck et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190049632 Shin et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190049732 Lee et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190057512 Han et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190064532 Riley, Jr. et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190086579 Kim et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190086683 Aieta et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190101448 Lee et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190113775 Jang et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190120817 Anderson Apr 2019 A1
20190121004 Ahmed et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190137075 Aieta et al. May 2019 A1
20190137762 Hu May 2019 A1
20190137793 Luo et al. May 2019 A1
20190154877 Capasso et al. May 2019 A1
20190162592 Khorasaninejad et al. May 2019 A1
20190170655 Smith Jun 2019 A1
20190191144 Arbabi et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190196068 Tsai et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190206136 West et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190219835 Skinner et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190235139 Chen et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190250107 Sreenivasan et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190369401 Rolland et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190377084 Sleasman et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190391378 Eichelkraut et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200025888 Jang et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200052027 Arbabi et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200096672 Yu et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200150311 Zhang et al. May 2020 A1
20200249429 Han et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200271941 Riley, Jr. et al. Aug 2020 A1
20200355913 Park et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210028215 Devlin et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210109364 Aieta et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210149081 Groever et al. May 2021 A1
20210190593 Yao et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210208469 Didomenico Jul 2021 A1
20210288095 Delga et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210302763 Yao et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210311588 Han et al. Oct 2021 A1
20220050294 Fermigier et al. Feb 2022 A1
20220052093 Devlin et al. Feb 2022 A1
20220091428 Riley, Jr. et al. Mar 2022 A1
20220107263 Biesinger et al. Apr 2022 A1
20220206186 Chen et al. Jun 2022 A1
20220214219 Faraon et al. Jul 2022 A1
20230194883 Riley et al. Jun 2023 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (426)
Number Date Country
3006173 Jun 2017 CA
3020261 Oct 2017 CA
3064764 Nov 2018 CA
101158727 Apr 2008 CN
101164147 Apr 2008 CN
100476504 Apr 2009 CN
101510013 Jun 2010 CN
101510012 Aug 2010 CN
101510011 Sep 2010 CN
101241173 Aug 2011 CN
202854395 Apr 2013 CN
103092049 May 2013 CN
203799117 Aug 2014 CN
204422813 Jun 2015 CN
104932043 Sep 2015 CN
104956491 Sep 2015 CN
204719330 Oct 2015 CN
105068396 Nov 2015 CN
103869484 Jan 2016 CN
105223689 Jan 2016 CN
105278026 Jan 2016 CN
105278309 Jan 2016 CN
105655286 Jun 2016 CN
105676314 Jun 2016 CN
105917277 Aug 2016 CN
103257441 Oct 2016 CN
205620619 Oct 2016 CN
104834079 Apr 2017 CN
106611699 May 2017 CN
104834089 Jun 2017 CN
106848555 Jun 2017 CN
106200276 Oct 2017 CN
104834088 Dec 2017 CN
105676314 Jan 2018 CN
107561857 Jan 2018 CN
108089325 May 2018 CN
108291983 Jul 2018 CN
207623619 Jul 2018 CN
106199997 Aug 2018 CN
108474869 Aug 2018 CN
108507542 Sep 2018 CN
207923075 Sep 2018 CN
108680544 Oct 2018 CN
108761779 Nov 2018 CN
109000692 Dec 2018 CN
208270846 Dec 2018 CN
109196387 Jan 2019 CN
106199956 Feb 2019 CN
109360139 Feb 2019 CN
106950195 May 2019 CN
106324832 Jul 2019 CN
106526730 Jul 2019 CN
106485761 Aug 2019 CN
110160685 Aug 2019 CN
110678773 Jan 2020 CN
111316138 Jun 2020 CN
111580190 Aug 2020 CN
111656707 Sep 2020 CN
111819489 Oct 2020 CN
213092332 Apr 2021 CN
113050295 Jun 2021 CN
113168022 Jul 2021 CN
110376665 Aug 2021 CN
213902664 Aug 2021 CN
213903843 Aug 2021 CN
214098104 Aug 2021 CN
113703080 Nov 2021 CN
113791524 Dec 2021 CN
113807312 Dec 2021 CN
113820839 Dec 2021 CN
113834568 Dec 2021 CN
113835227 Dec 2021 CN
113851573 Dec 2021 CN
215005942 Dec 2021 CN
215010478 Dec 2021 CN
110494771 Jan 2022 CN
113885106 Jan 2022 CN
113899451 Jan 2022 CN
113900078 Jan 2022 CN
113900162 Jan 2022 CN
113917574 Jan 2022 CN
113917578 Jan 2022 CN
113934004 Jan 2022 CN
113934005 Jan 2022 CN
113959984 Jan 2022 CN
114002707 Feb 2022 CN
114019589 Feb 2022 CN
114047632 Feb 2022 CN
114047637 Feb 2022 CN
114112058 Mar 2022 CN
114156168 Mar 2022 CN
114176492 Mar 2022 CN
215932365 Mar 2022 CN
114280704 Apr 2022 CN
114280716 Apr 2022 CN
114286953 Apr 2022 CN
114296180 Apr 2022 CN
114325886 Apr 2022 CN
114326163 Apr 2022 CN
114354141 Apr 2022 CN
114373825 Apr 2022 CN
114384612 Apr 2022 CN
114397092 Apr 2022 CN
114397718 Apr 2022 CN
114415386 Apr 2022 CN
216345776 Apr 2022 CN
216351311 Apr 2022 CN
216351591 Apr 2022 CN
216355281 Apr 2022 CN
216361353 Apr 2022 CN
111316138 May 2022 CN
114488365 May 2022 CN
114543993 May 2022 CN
114545367 May 2022 CN
114545370 May 2022 CN
114554062 May 2022 CN
114561266 May 2022 CN
216593224 May 2022 CN
216605227 May 2022 CN
216622749 May 2022 CN
114578642 Jun 2022 CN
114593689 Jun 2022 CN
114623960 Jun 2022 CN
114624878 Jun 2022 CN
114660683 Jun 2022 CN
114660780 Jun 2022 CN
114690387 Jul 2022 CN
114740631 Jul 2022 CN
114743714 Jul 2022 CN
114779437 Jul 2022 CN
216896898 Jul 2022 CN
216900930 Jul 2022 CN
216901121 Jul 2022 CN
216901165 Jul 2022 CN
216901317 Jul 2022 CN
216901952 Jul 2022 CN
216903719 Jul 2022 CN
216933177 Jul 2022 CN
217034311 Jul 2022 CN
217034418 Jul 2022 CN
217034466 Jul 2022 CN
114859446 Aug 2022 CN
114859447 Aug 2022 CN
114859570 Aug 2022 CN
114935741 Aug 2022 CN
217276608 Aug 2022 CN
217278911 Aug 2022 CN
217278915 Aug 2022 CN
217278989 Aug 2022 CN
217279003 Aug 2022 CN
217279087 Aug 2022 CN
217279110 Aug 2022 CN
217279168 Aug 2022 CN
217279244 Aug 2022 CN
217280797 Aug 2022 CN
217280851 Aug 2022 CN
217281621 Aug 2022 CN
217281623 Aug 2022 CN
114995038 Sep 2022 CN
115016099 Sep 2022 CN
115016150 Sep 2022 CN
115032766 Sep 2022 CN
115047432 Sep 2022 CN
115047548 Sep 2022 CN
115047653 Sep 2022 CN
115061114 Sep 2022 CN
115079415 Sep 2022 CN
115113174 Sep 2022 CN
217456368 Sep 2022 CN
217465697 Sep 2022 CN
217466052 Sep 2022 CN
217466667 Sep 2022 CN
217467162 Sep 2022 CN
217467176 Sep 2022 CN
217467177 Sep 2022 CN
217467226 Sep 2022 CN
217467326 Sep 2022 CN
217467327 Sep 2022 CN
217467336 Sep 2022 CN
217467338 Sep 2022 CN
217467351 Sep 2022 CN
217467352 Sep 2022 CN
217467353 Sep 2022 CN
217467355 Sep 2022 CN
217467357 Sep 2022 CN
217467358 Sep 2022 CN
217467363 Sep 2022 CN
217467364 Sep 2022 CN
217467367 Sep 2022 CN
217467368 Sep 2022 CN
217467395 Sep 2022 CN
217467396 Sep 2022 CN
217467399 Sep 2022 CN
217467439 Sep 2022 CN
217467452 Sep 2022 CN
115164714 Oct 2022 CN
115166876 Oct 2022 CN
115166958 Oct 2022 CN
115185082 Oct 2022 CN
115211799 Oct 2022 CN
115236795 Oct 2022 CN
217639515 Oct 2022 CN
217639519 Oct 2022 CN
217639539 Oct 2022 CN
217639544 Oct 2022 CN
217639611 Oct 2022 CN
217639612 Oct 2022 CN
217639613 Oct 2022 CN
217639715 Oct 2022 CN
217639718 Oct 2022 CN
217639719 Oct 2022 CN
217639720 Oct 2022 CN
217639722 Oct 2022 CN
217639723 Oct 2022 CN
217639724 Oct 2022 CN
217639725 Oct 2022 CN
217639726 Oct 2022 CN
217639763 Oct 2022 CN
217639765 Oct 2022 CN
217639767 Oct 2022 CN
217639768 Oct 2022 CN
217639769 Oct 2022 CN
217639770 Oct 2022 CN
217639771 Oct 2022 CN
217639772 Oct 2022 CN
217639773 Oct 2022 CN
217639774 Oct 2022 CN
217639776 Oct 2022 CN
217639777 Oct 2022 CN
217639778 Oct 2022 CN
217639903 Oct 2022 CN
217639920 Oct 2022 CN
115268058 Nov 2022 CN
115327865 Nov 2022 CN
115332917 Nov 2022 CN
115343795 Nov 2022 CN
115390176 Nov 2022 CN
217809433 Nov 2022 CN
217818613 Nov 2022 CN
217819022 Nov 2022 CN
217820828 Nov 2022 CN
217820829 Nov 2022 CN
217820831 Nov 2022 CN
217820834 Nov 2022 CN
217820838 Nov 2022 CN
217820839 Nov 2022 CN
217820840 Nov 2022 CN
217820943 Nov 2022 CN
217820944 Nov 2022 CN
217820945 Nov 2022 CN
217820971 Nov 2022 CN
217821058 Nov 2022 CN
217821068 Nov 2022 CN
217821071 Nov 2022 CN
217821091 Nov 2022 CN
217821110 Nov 2022 CN
217821111 Nov 2022 CN
217821113 Nov 2022 CN
217821122 Nov 2022 CN
217821160 Nov 2022 CN
217821236 Nov 2022 CN
217821680 Nov 2022 CN
217821696 Nov 2022 CN
217822825 Nov 2022 CN
217823690 Nov 2022 CN
217825178 Nov 2022 CN
217885960 Nov 2022 CN
217902220 Nov 2022 CN
217902222 Nov 2022 CN
115421295 Dec 2022 CN
115453754 Dec 2022 CN
115524768 Dec 2022 CN
115524775 Dec 2022 CN
115524874 Dec 2022 CN
217981833 Dec 2022 CN
217981857 Dec 2022 CN
217981991 Dec 2022 CN
217981992 Dec 2022 CN
217982020 Dec 2022 CN
217982038 Dec 2022 CN
217982089 Dec 2022 CN
217982120 Dec 2022 CN
217983382 Dec 2022 CN
217984044 Dec 2022 CN
102007058558 Jun 2009 DE
102009037629 Feb 2011 DE
102012212753 Jan 2014 DE
102015221985 May 2017 DE
102016218996 Sep 2017 DE
112018002811 Feb 2020 DE
112018002670 Mar 2020 DE
1251397 Oct 2002 EP
1252623 Oct 2004 EP
2763519 Aug 2014 EP
2338114 Mar 2017 EP
3226042 Oct 2017 EP
3353578 Aug 2018 EP
3380876 Oct 2018 EP
3385770 Oct 2018 EP
3440484 Feb 2019 EP
3504566 Jul 2019 EP
3631533 Apr 2020 EP
3676973 Jul 2020 EP
3743764 Dec 2020 EP
3799626 Apr 2021 EP
4004608 Jun 2022 EP
2490895 Nov 2012 GB
2499869 Mar 2018 GB
2578049 Apr 2020 GB
2578233 Apr 2020 GB
2578236 Apr 2020 GB
2578236 Nov 2022 GB
40010538 Jul 2020 HK
2004302457 Oct 2004 JP
2005017408 Jan 2005 JP
2005274847 Oct 2005 JP
2008046428 Feb 2008 JP
2008299084 Dec 2008 JP
2010085977 Apr 2010 JP
2015502581 Jan 2015 JP
2015092234 May 2015 JP
2016511936 Apr 2016 JP
2017062373 Mar 2017 JP
2018536204 Dec 2018 JP
2018537804 Dec 2018 JP
2019516128 Jun 2019 JP
2020522009 Jul 2020 JP
2022542172 Sep 2022 JP
20080099452 Nov 2008 KR
20080103149 Nov 2008 KR
20090002583 Jan 2009 KR
20100027995 Mar 2010 KR
101493928 Mar 2015 KR
20150113041 Oct 2015 KR
20170015109 Feb 2017 KR
20180083885 Jul 2018 KR
20180121309 Nov 2018 KR
20180124106 Nov 2018 KR
101905444 Dec 2018 KR
20190038221 Apr 2019 KR
102036640 Oct 2019 KR
1020200008630 Jan 2020 KR
1020200108901 Sep 2020 KR
20210088520 Jul 2021 KR
10-2363805 Feb 2022 KR
1020220035971 Mar 2022 KR
11201804346 Jun 2018 SG
11201808772 Nov 2021 SG
11202001717 Feb 2023 SG
11202013228 Feb 2024 SG
201017338 May 2010 TW
201438242 Oct 2014 TW
201908232 Mar 2019 TW
0043750 Jul 2000 WO
2007141788 Dec 2007 WO
2009067540 May 2009 WO
2009124181 Oct 2009 WO
2011106553 Sep 2011 WO
2011106553 Jan 2012 WO
2012122677 Sep 2012 WO
2012139634 Oct 2012 WO
2012144997 Oct 2012 WO
2012172366 Dec 2012 WO
2013033591 Mar 2013 WO
2014116500 Jul 2014 WO
2015021255 Feb 2015 WO
2015077926 Jun 2015 WO
2015112939 Jul 2015 WO
2016049629 Mar 2016 WO
2016051325 Apr 2016 WO
2016086204 Jun 2016 WO
2016140720 Sep 2016 WO
2016140720 Oct 2016 WO
2016168173 Oct 2016 WO
2016178740 Nov 2016 WO
2016191142 Dec 2016 WO
2017005709 Jan 2017 WO
2017034995 Mar 2017 WO
2017040854 Mar 2017 WO
2017053309 Mar 2017 WO
2017079480 May 2017 WO
2017091738 Jun 2017 WO
2017176921 Oct 2017 WO
2017182771 Oct 2017 WO
2018063455 Apr 2018 WO
2018067246 Apr 2018 WO
2018063455 May 2018 WO
2018118984 Jun 2018 WO
2018134215 Jul 2018 WO
2018067246 Aug 2018 WO
2018142339 Aug 2018 WO
2018204856 Nov 2018 WO
2018218063 Nov 2018 WO
2018219710 Dec 2018 WO
2018222944 Dec 2018 WO
2019015735 Jan 2019 WO
2019039241 Feb 2019 WO
2019043016 Mar 2019 WO
2019046827 Mar 2019 WO
2019057907 Mar 2019 WO
2019075335 Apr 2019 WO
2019101750 May 2019 WO
2019103762 May 2019 WO
2019108290 Jun 2019 WO
2019113106 Jun 2019 WO
2019116364 Jun 2019 WO
2019118646 Jun 2019 WO
2019119025 Jun 2019 WO
2019103762 Jul 2019 WO
2019136166 Jul 2019 WO
2019103762 Aug 2019 WO
2019147828 Aug 2019 WO
2019148200 Aug 2019 WO
2019164542 Aug 2019 WO
2019164849 Aug 2019 WO
2019173357 Sep 2019 WO
2019198568 Oct 2019 WO
2019203876 Oct 2019 WO
2019204667 Oct 2019 WO
2019206430 Oct 2019 WO
2020001938 Jan 2020 WO
2020010084 Jan 2020 WO
2020214617 Oct 2020 WO
2021021671 Feb 2021 WO
2021130085 Jul 2021 WO
2021230868 Nov 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (189)
Entry
Jin et al., “Waveforms for Optimal Sub-keV High-Order Harmonics with Synthesized Two- or Three-Colour Laser Fields”, Nature Communications, May 30, 2014, vol. 5, No. 4003, pp. 1-6.
Kats et al., “Giant birefringence in optical antenna arrays with widely tailorable optical anisotropy”, PNAS, Jul. 31, 2012, vol. 109, No. 31, pp. 12364-12368, www.pnas.org/dgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1210686109.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Visible Wavelength Planar Metalenses Based on Titanium Dioxide”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, May/Jun. 2017, vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 43-58.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Achromatic Metalens over 60 nm Bandwidth in the Visible and Metalens with Reverse Chromatic Dispersion”, Nano Letters, Jan. 26, 2017, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 1819-1824, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05137.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Achromatic Metasurface Lens at Telecommunication Wavelengths”, Nanno Letters, Jul. 13, 2015, vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 5358-5362, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01727.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Broadband and chiral binary dielectric meta-holograms”, Science Advances, May 13, 2016, vol. 2, No. 5, 6 pgs., doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501258.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Broadband Multifunctional Efficient Meta-Gratings Based on Dielectric Waveguide Phase Shifters”, Nano Letters, Sep. 15, 2015, vol. 15, No. 10, pp. 6709-6715, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02524.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Metalenses at Visible Wavelengths: Diffraction-Limited Focusing and Subwavelength Resolution Imaging”, Science, vol. 352, No. 6290, Jun. 3, 2016, pp. 1190-1194, doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6644.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Multispectral Chiral Imaging with a Metalens”, Nano Letters, Jun. 7, 2016, vol. 16, pp. 4595-4600, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01897.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Planar Lenses at Visible Wavelengths”, Arxiv,May 7, 2016, 17 pages.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Polarization-Insensitive Metalenses at Visible Wavelengths”, Nano Letters, Oct. 24, 2016, vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 7229-7234, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03626.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Super-Dispersive Off-Axis Meta-Lenses for Compact High Resolution Spectroscopy”, Nano Letters, Apr. 27, 2016, vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 3732-3737, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01097.
Kildishev et al., “Planar Photonics with Metasurfaces”, Science, vol. 339, No. 6125, Mar. 15, 2013, pp. 1232009-1-1232009-6, DOI: 10.1126.science.1232009.
Kominami et al., “Dipole and Slot Elements and Arrays on Semi-Infinite Substrates”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Jun. 1985, vol. AP33, No. 6, pp. 600-607.
Krasnok et al., “All-dielectric optical nanoantennas”, Optics Express, Aug. 23, 2012, vol. 20, No. 18, pp. 20599-20604.
Kress et al., “Applied Digital Optics from Micro-Optics to Nanophotonics”, Applied Digital Optics, 2009, Wiley, 30 pgs.
Lalanne et al., “Interaction between optical nano-objects at metallo-dielectric interfaces”, Nature Physics, Aug. 2006, vol. 2. pp. 551-556, doi:10.1038/nphys364.
Leveque et al., “Transient behavior of surface plasmon polaritons scattered at a subwavelength groove”, Physical Reviews B, 76, Oct. 18, 2007, pp. 155418-1-155418-8, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76. 155418.
Lezec et al., “Beaming Light from a Subwavelength Aperture”, Science Express, Aug. 2, 2002, vol. 297, pp. 820-822, doi:10.1126/science.1071895.
Li et al., “Achromatic Flat Optical Components via Compensation between Structure and Material Dispersions.”, Scientific Reports, 2016, vol. 6, No. 19885, 7 pgs., DOI:10.1038/srep19885.
Li et al., “Flat metasurfaces to focus electromagnetic waves in reflection geometry”, Optics Letters, 2012, vol. 37, No. 23, pp. 4940-4942.
Lin et al., “Dielectric Gradient Metasurface Optical Elements”, Science, Jul. 18, 2014, vol. 345, Issue 6194, pp. 298-302, DOI:10.1126/science.1253213.
Liu et al., “Realization of polarization evolution on higher-order Poincare sphere with metasurface”, Applied Physics Letters, 2014, vol. 104, pp. 191110-1-191101-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4878409.
Lo et al., “New Architecture for Space Telescopes Uses Fresnel Lenses”, SPIE Newsroom, Aug. 9, 2006, 2 pgs., doi: 10.1117/2.1200608.0333.
Lu et al., “Planar high-numerical-aperture low-loss focusing reflectors and lenses using subwavelength high contrast gratings”, Optics Express, Jun. 7, 2010, vol. 18, No. 12, pp. 12606-12614, doi: 10.1364/OE.18.012606.
Luk et al., “Dielectric Resonator Antennas”, Research Studies Press Ltd, Hertfordshire, 2003, 404 pgs. (presented in two parts).
Mao et al., “Nanopatterning Using a Simple Bi-Layer Lift-Off Process for the Fabrication of a Photonic Crystal Nanostructure”, Nanotechnology, Feb. 1, 2013, vol. 24, No. 8, 6 pgs., doi:10.1088/0957-4484/24/8/085302.
Mao et al., “Surface Patterning of Nonscattering Phosphors for Light Extraction”, Optics Letters, Aug. 1, 2013, vol. 38, No. 15, pp. 2796-2799, doi: 10.1364/OL.38.002796.
Martin-Moreno, “Theory of highly directional emission from a single sub-wavelength aperture surrounded by surface corrugations”, Physical Review Letters, Apr. 25, 2003, vol. 90, No. 16, 167401, pp. 167401-1-167401-4, published online Apr. 23, 2003, doi:10.1103/PnysRevLett.9.167401.
Mcleod, “Thin-Film Optical Filters”, Adam Hilger, 1986, 667 pgs. (presented in three parts).
Miyazaki et al., “Ultraviolet-Nanoimprinted Packaged Metasurface Thermal Emitters for Infrared CO2 Sensing”, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, Published May 20, 2015, vol. 16, No. 3, 5 pgs., doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/035005.
Monticone et al., “Full Control of Nanoscale Optical Transmission with a Composite Metascreen”, Physical Review Letters, May 17, 2013, vol. 110, pp. 203903-1-203903-5, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.203903.
Mueller et al., “Metasurface Polarization Optics: Independent Phase Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization”, Physical Review Letters, Mar. 17, 2017, vol. 118, 113901, 5 pgs.
Ni et al., “Broadband Light Bending with Plasmonic Nanoantennas”, Science, Jan. 27, 2012, vol. 335, Issue 6067, 3 pgs., published online Dec. 22, 2011, DOI: 10.1126/science.1214686.
Ni et al., “Ultra-thin, planar, Babinet-inverted plasmonic metalenses”, Light Science & Applications, 2013, vol. 2, e72, pp. 1-6, published online Apr. 26, 2013, doi:10.1038/lsa.2013.28.
Okaya et al., “The Dielectric Microwave Resonator”, Proceedings of the IRE, Oct. 1962, vol. 50, Issue 10, pp. 2081-2092, DOI: 10.1109/JRPROC.1962.288245.
Pacheco-Peña et al., “Epsilon-near-zero metalenses operating in the visible”, Optics & Laser Technology, Jan. 19, 2016, 80, 18 pgs.
Peinado et al., “Optimization and performance criteria of a Stokes polarimeter based on two variable retarders”, Optics Express, Apr. 12, 2010, vol. 18, No. 8, pp. 9815-9530.
Petosa et al., “An Overview of Tuning Techniques for Frequency-Agile Antennas”, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Oct. 2012, vol. 52, pp. 5, pp. 271-296.
Pfeiffer et al., “Metamaterial Huygens' Surface: Tailoring Wave Fronts with Reflectionless Sheets”, Physical Review Letters, May 10, 2013, vol. 110, pp. 197401-1-197401-5. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.197401.
Pors et al, “Broadband Focusing Flat Mirrors Based on Plasmonic Gradient Metasurfaces”, Nano Letters, Jan. 23, 2013, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 829-834, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl304761m.
Reichelt et al., “Capabilities of diffractive optical elements for real-time holographic displays”, Proceedings of SPIE, Feb. 2008, vol. 6912, pp. 69120-69130, pttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.762887.
Rubin et al., “Polarization State Generation and Measurement with a Single Metasurface”, Optics Express, Aug. 20, 2018, vol. 26, Issue No. 17, pp. 21455-21478, XP055750318, DOI: 10.1364/0E.26.021455.
Saeidi et al., “Wideband plasmonic focusing metasurfaces”, Applied Physics Letters, Aug. 2014, vol. 105, pp. 053107-1-053107-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4892560.
Sales et al., “Diffractive-Refractive Behavior of Kinoform Lenses”, Applied Optics, Jan. 1, 1997, vol. 36, pp. 253-257, No. 1, doi: 10.1364/AO.36.000253.
Sancho-Parramon et al., “Optical characterization of HfO2 by spectroscopic ellipsometry: dispersion models and direct data inversion”, Thin Solid Films, 2008, vol. 516, pp. 7990-7995, available online Apr. 10, 2008, doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2008.04.007.
She et al., “Large area metalenses: design, characterization, and mass manufacturing”, Optics Express, Jan. 22, 2018, vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 1573-1585, doi: 10.1364/OE.26.001573.
Sun et al., “High-Efficiency Broadband anomalous Reflection by Gradient Meta-Surfaces”, Nano Letters, 2012, vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 6223-6229, dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl3032668.
Vo et al., “Sub-wavelength grating lenses with a twist”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Jul. 1, 2014, vol. 26, No. 13, pp. 1375-1378, DOI: 10.1109/LPT.2014.2325947.
Walther et al., “Spatial and Spectral Light Shaping with Metamaterials”, Advanced Materials, 2012, vol. 24, pp. 6300-6304, doi: 10.1002/adma.201202540.
Wang et al., “Generation of steep phase anisotropy with zero-backscattering by arrays of coupled dielectric nano-resonators”, Applied Physics Letters, 2014, vol. 105, pp. 121112-1-121112-5, published online Sep. 25, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4896631.
Wu et al., “Spectrally selective chiral silicon metasurfaces based on infrared Fano resonances”, Nature Communications, 2014, vol. 5, No. 3892, published online May 27, 2014, 9 pgs., DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4892.
Yang et al., “Design of ultrathin plasmonic quarter-wave plate based on period coupling”, Optics Letters, 2013, vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 679-681, https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.000679.
Yao et al., “Wide Wavelength Tuning of Optical Antennas on Graphene with Nanosecond Response Time”, Nano Letters, 2014, First Published Dec. 3, 2013, vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 214-219, doi: 10.1021/nl403751p.
Yu et al., “A Broadband, Background-Free Quarter-Wave Plate Based on Plasmonic Metasurfaces”, Nano Letters, Nov. 3, 2012, vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 6328-6333, dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl303445u.
Yu et al., “Flat optics with designer metasurfaces”, Nature Materials, vol. 13, Feb. 2014, published online Jan. 23, 2014, pp. 139-150, DOI:10.1038/NMAT3839.
Yu et al., “Flat optics: Controlling wavefronts with optical antenna metasurfaces”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics, 2013, vol. 19, No. 3, 23 pgs.
Yu et al., “Light Propagation with Phase Discontinuities: Generalized Laws of Reflection and Refraction”, Science, vol. 334, No. 6054, Oct. 21, 2011, pp. 333-337, doi: 10.1126/science.1210713.
Yu et al., “Quantum cascade lasers with integrated plasmonic antenna-array collimators”, Optics Express, Nov. 24, 2008, vol. 16, No. 24, pp. 19447-19461, published online Nov. 10, 2008.
Yu et al., “Small divergence edge-emitting semiconductor lasers with two-dimensional plasmonic collimators”, Applied Physics Letters, 2008, vol. 93, pp. 181101-1-181101-3, doi: 10.1063/1.3009599.
Yu et al., “Small-divergence semiconductor lasers by plasmonic collimation”, Nature Photonics, Sep. 2008, vol. 2, pp. 564-570, doi:10.1038/nphoton.2008.052.
Zhao et al., “Mie resonance-based dielectric metamaterials”, Materials Today, Dec. 2009, vol. 12, No. 12, pp. 60-69.
Zhao et al., “Twisted Optical metamaterials or planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers”, Nature Communications, 2012, vol. 3, No. 870, pp. 1-7, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1877.
Zhou et al., “Characteristic Analysis of Compact Spectrometer Based on Off-Axis Meta-Lens”, Applied Sciences, 2018, vol. 8, vol. 321, doi:10.3390/app8030321, 11 pgs.
Zhou et al., “Plasmonic holographic imaging with V-shaped nanoantenna array”, Optics Express, Feb. 25, 2013, vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 4348-4354, published online Feb. 12, 2013.
Zhu et al., “Ultra-compact visible chiral spectrometer with meta-lenses”, APL Photonics, Feb. 7, 2017, vol. 2, pp. 036103-1-036103-12, 13 pgs., doi: 10.1063/1.4974259.
Zou et al., “Dielectric resonator nanoantennas at visible frequencies”, Optics Express, Jan. 14, 2013, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1344-1352, published online Jan. 11, 2013.
Extended European Search Report for European Application 17858861.2, Report Completed Mar. 13, 2020, Mailed Mar. 23, 2020, 9 Pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19830958.5, Search completed Feb. 17, 2022, Mailed Feb. 25, 2022, 8 Pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17779772.7, Search completed Oct. 15, 2019, Mailed Oct. 25, 2019, 10 Pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16869282.0, Search completed Nov. 8, 2019, Mailed Nov. 20, 2019, 15 Pgs.
Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. 11201808772W, Search completed Jan. 20, 2020, Mailed Jan. 28, 2020, 12 Pgs.
Supplementary Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 16869282.0, Search completed Jun. 19, 2019, Mailed Jul. 2, 2019, 12 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2018/049276, Report issued on Mar. 3, 2020, Mailed on Mar. 12, 2020, 8 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2019/040302, Report issued Jan. 5, 2021, Mailed Jan. 14, 2021, 5 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/038357, Report issued Dec. 24, 2019, Mailed Jan. 2, 2020, 6 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2012/053434, Report issued Mar. 4, 2014, Mailed Mar. 13, 2014, 6 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2015/064930, Report issued Jun. 13, 2017, Mailed Jun. 22, 2017, 8 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2016/063617, Report issued May 29, 2018, Mailed Jun. 7, 2018, 6 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2017/026206, Report issued Oct. 9, 2018, Mailed Oct. 18, 2018, 8 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/031204, Report issued Nov. 5, 2019, Mailed Nov. 14, 2019, 8 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/035502, Report issued Dec. 3, 2019, Mailed Dec. 12, 2019, 7 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/046947, Issued Feb. 18, 2020, mailed on Feb. 27, 2020, 6 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2008/084068, Report issued on May 25, 2010, 5 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/052685, Report issued Mar. 27, 2018, Mailed Apr. 5, 2018, 8 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2017/036897, Report issued Dec. 11, 2018, Mailed Dec. 20, 2018, 8 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2017/048469, Report issued Feb. 26, 2019, Mailed Mar. 7, 2019, 5 Pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2018/034460, Report issued Nov. 26, 2019, Mailed Dec. 5, 2019, 6 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2012/053434, Search completed Oct. 17, 2012, Mailed Dec. 17, 2012, 7 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/014975, Search completed Jun. 17, 2019, Mailed Jul. 8, 2019, 10 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/018615, Search completed Apr. 12, 2019, Mailed May 6, 2019, 12 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/040302, completed Aug. 29, 2019, Mailed Oct. 17, 2019, 6 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/043600, Search completed Sep. 29, 2020, Mailed Nov. 24, 2020, 11 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/084068, Completed Jan. 13, 2009, Mailed Feb. 2, 2009, 6 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/064930, Search completed Sep. 9, 2016, Mailed Sep. 20, 2016, 11 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/052685, Search completed Nov. 30, 2016, Mailed Dec. 9, 2016, 12 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/063617, Search completed Jan. 19, 2017, Mailed Mar. 31, 2017, 9 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/026206, Search completed Jun. 10, 2017, Mailed Jun. 28, 2017, 11 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/036897, Search completed Jan. 31, 2018, Mailed Feb. 21, 2018, 9 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2017/048469, Search completed Apr. 20, 2018, Mailed May 4, 2018, 9 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/031204, Search completed Jun. 29, 2018, Mailed Jul. 23, 2018, 14 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/034460, Search completed Jul. 29, 2018, Mailed Aug. 24, 2018, 10 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/035502, Search completed Jul. 31, 2018, Mailed Aug. 24, 2018, 13 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/038357, Search completed Apr. 9, 2019, Mailed May 13, 2019, 12 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/046947, Search completed Oct. 14, 2019, Mailed Oct. 25, 2019, 10 Pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2018/049276, Search completed Oct. 26, 2018, Mailed Jan. 15, 2019, 12 Pgs.
“Materials for High and Low Refractive Index Coatings”, 2019, Sigma-Aldrich tech. www.sigmaaldrich.com/materials-science/organic-electronics/ri-coatings.html (3 pages).
“These Tiny, Incredible ‘Metalenses’ are the Next Giant Leap in Optics”, PetaPixel, Jun. 3, 2016, 21 pgs.
Aieta et al., “Aberration-Free Ultrathin Flat Lenses and Axicons at Telecom Wavelengths Based on Plasmonic Metasurfaces”, Nano Lett., Web publication date Aug. 15, 2012, vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 4932-4936.
Aieta et al., “Aberrations of flat lenses and aplanatic metasurfaces”, Optics Express, Dec. 16, 2013, vol. 21, No. 25, pp. 31530-31539, doi: 10.1364/oe.21.031530.
Aieta et al., “Multiwavelength Achromatic Metasurfaces by Dispersive Phase Compensation”, Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, Mar. 20, 2015, vol. 347, No. 6228, pp. 1342-1345, doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2494.
Aieta et al., “Out-of-Plane Reflection and Refraction of Light by Anisotropic Optical Antenna Metasurfaces with Phase Discontinuities”, Nano Letters,Feb. 15, 2012, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1702-1706, doi: 10.1021/nl300204s.
Arbabi et al., “Dielectric Metasurfaces for Complete Control of Phase and Polarization with Subwavelength Spatial Resolution and High Transmission”, Nature Nanotechnology, Aug. 31, 2015, 27 pgs., doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.186.
Arbabi et al., “Miniature Optical Planar Camera Based on a Wide-Angle Metasurface Doublet Corrected for Monochromatic Aberrations”, Nature Communications, Nov. 28, 2016, vol. 7, Article No. 13682, 9 pgs., doi:10.1038/ncomms13682.
Arbabi et al., “Subwavelength-Thick Lenses with High Numerical Apertures and Large Efficiency Based on High-Contrast Transmitarrays”, Nature Communications, May 5, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 7069, doi:10.1038/ncomms8069.
Arbabi et al., “Supplementary Figures of Miniature Optical Planar Camera Based on a Wide-Angle Metasurface Doublet Corrected for Monochromatic Aberrations”, Nature Communications, 2016 vol. 7, Article No. 13682.
Azadegan et al., “A novel approach for miniaturization of slot antennas”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Mar. 2003, vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 421-429, doi:10.1109/TAP.2003.809853.
Blanchard et al., “Modeling nanoscale, V-shaped antennas for the design of optical phased arrays”, Physical Review, Apr. 30, 2012, vol. B 85, pp. 155457-1-155457-11, DOI: 10.1103/physRevB.85.155457.
Buralli et al., “Optical Performance of Holographic Kinoforms”, Applied Optics, Mar. 1, 1989, vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 976-983, doi: 10.1364/AO.28.000976.
Byrnes et al., “Designing Large, High-Efficiency, High-Numerical-Aperture, Transmissive Meta-Lenses for Visible Light”, Optics Express, Mar. 7, 2016, vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 5110-5124, DOI:10.1364/OE.24.005110.
Campione et al., “Tailoring dielectric resonator geometrics for directional scattering and Huygens' metasurface”, Optics Express, Feb. 9, 2015, vol. 23, Issue 3, published online Jan. 28, 2015, pp. 2293-2307, arXiv:1410.2315, DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.002293.
Chen et al., “A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible”, Nature Nanotechnology, Jan. 1, 2018, vol. 13, pp. 220-226, doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0034-6.
Chen et al., “A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications”, Reports on Progress in Physics, Jun. 16, 2016, vol. 79, 076401, 40 pgs., doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401.
Chen et al., “Dual-polarity plasmonic metalens for visible light”, Nature Communications, Nov. 13, 2012, vol. 3, No. 1198, pp. 1-6, DOI 10.10388/ncomms2207.
Chen et al., “Engineering the phase front of light with phase-change material based planar lenses”, Sci Rep 5, 8660 (2015), Published Mar. 2, 2015, 7 pgs.
Chen et al., “High-Efficiency Broadband Meta-Hologram with Polarization-Controlled Dual Images”, Nano Letters, 2014, vol. 14, No. 1, published online Dec. 13, 2013, pp. 225-230, https://doi.org.10.1021/nl403811d.
Chen et al., “Immersion Meta-Lenses at Visible Wavelengths for Nanoscale Imaging”, Nano Letters, Apr. 7, 2017, vol. 17, No. 5, 7 pgs., doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00717.
Chen et al., “Phase and dispersion engineering of metalenses: broadband achromatic focusing and imaging in the visible”, Nov. 26, 2017. Cornell University. [retrieved on Apr. 11, 2019). Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.09343v1 >. entire document, 30 pgs.
Chen et al., “Supplementary information of Engineering the phase front of light with phase-change material based planar lenses”, Sci Rep 5, 8660 (2015), Published Mar. 2, 2015, 4 pgs.
Chou et al., “Imprint lithography with 25-nanometer resolution”, Science, Apr. 5, 1996, vol. 272, Issue 5258, pp. 85-87.
Dayal et al., “Polarization control of 0.85μm vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers integrated with gold nanorod arrays”, Applied Physics Letters, 2007, vol. 91, pp. 111107-1-111107-3, published online Sep. 12, 2007, DOI: 10.1063/1.2783281.
Decker et al., “High-efficiency light-wave control with all-dielectric optical Huygens' metasurfaces”, Advanced Optical Materials, arXiv:1405.5038, May 2014, pp. 813-820, doi:10.1002/adom.201400584.
Devlin et al., “Arbitrary spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion of light”, Science, vol. 358, Nov. 17, 2017, published online Nov. 2, 2017, pp. 896-901, DOI: 10.1126/science.aao5392.
Devlin et al., “Broadband high-efficiency dielectric metasurfaces for the visible spectrum”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, Sep. 20, 2016, vol. 113, No. 38, pp. 10473-10478, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611740113.
Devlin et al., “High Efficiency Dielectric Metasurfaces at Visible Wavelengths”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1603/1603.02735.pdf, Mar. 8, 2016, 18 pgs.
Dong et al., “Zero-index photonic crystal as low-aberration optical lens (Conference Presentation)”, Proc. SPIE 9918, Metamaterials, Metadevices, and Metasystems, Nov. 9, 2016, 991822, available at https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2237137, 1 pg.
Evlyukhin et al., “Optical response features of Si-nanoparticle arrays”, Physical Review B, 2010, vol. 82, 045404-1-045404-11, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.045404.
Fattal et al., “Flat dielectric grating reflectors with focusing abilities”, Nature Photonics, May 2, 2010, vol. 4, No. 7, XP055162682, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.116.
Genevet et al., “Breakthroughs in Photonics 2013: Flat Optics: Wavefronts Control with Huygens' Interfaces”, IEEE Photonics Journal, Apr. 1, 2014, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-4, XP011546594, doi: 10.1109/jphot.2014.2308194.
Genevet et al., “Recent advances in planar optics: from plasmonic to dielectric metasurfaces”, Optica, Jan. 19, 2017, vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 139-152, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000139.
Goldberg, “Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning”, Addison-Wesley, 1989, 432 pgs., (presented in two parts).
Groever et al., “Meta-Lens Doublet in the Visible Region”, Nano Letters, Jun. 29, 2017, vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 4902-4907, doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01888.
Hartwig et al., “Challenges for Reducing the Size of Laser Activated Remote Phosphor Light Engines for DLP Projection”, Proceedings of SPIE, International Optical Design Conference, Dec. 17, 2014, vol. 9293, pp. 929313-1 to 929313-6, doi: 10.1117/12.2073275, ISBN: 978-1-62841-730-2.
Hidber et al., “Microcontact printing of Palladium colloids: micron-scale patterning by electroless deposition of copper”, 1996, Langmuir, The ACS Journal of Surfaces and Colloids, vol. 12, pp. 1375-1380.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18805669.1, Search completed Feb. 9, 2021, Mailed Feb. 18, 2021, 13 pgs.
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18852460.7, Search completed Mar. 25, 2021, Mailed Apr. 6, 2021, 13 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2020/028159, Report issued Sep. 28, 2021, Mailed on Oct. 28, 2021, 7 pgs.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2020/043600, Report issued Feb. 1, 2022, Mailed on Feb. 10, 2022, 9 pgs.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/028159, Search completed Jun. 15, 2020, Mailed Aug. 11, 2020, 7 pgs.
Arbabi et al., “Efficient Dielectric Metasurface Collimating Lenses for Mid-Infrared Quantum Cascade Lasers”, Optics Express, vol. 23, No. 26, Dec. 28, 2015, pp. 33310-33317, doi: 10.1364/OE.23.033310.
Birch et al., “3D Imaging with Structured Illumination for Advanced Security Applications”, Sandia Report, Sep. 2015, retrieved from the internet: URL: <https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1221516>, 64 pages, doi: 10.2172/1221516.
Chen et al., “Broadband Achromatic Metasurface-Refractive Optics”, Nano Letters, vol. 18, Nov. 13, 2018, pp. 7801-7808.
Cumme et al., “From Regular Periodic Micro-Lens Arrays to Randomized Continuous Phase Profiles”, Advanced Optical Technologies, vol. 4, No. 1, 2015, pp. 47-61.
Ding et al., “Gradient Metasurfaces: Fundamentals and Applications”, ArXiv:1704:03032v1 [physics.optics], Apr. 10, 2017, 83 pgs.
Engelberg et al., “Near-IR Wide Field-of-View Huygens Metalens for Outdoor Imaging Applications”, IEEE, Cleo, 2019, 2 pgs.
Herrera-Fernandez et al., “Double Diffractive Optical Element System for Near-Field Shaping”, Applied Optics, vol. 50, No. 23, Aug. 10, 2011, pp. 4587-4593.
Horie et al., “Reflective Optical Phase Modulator Based on High-Contrast Grating Mirrors”, Optical Society of America, IEEE, 2014, 2 pgs.
Hsiao et al., “Fundamentals and Applications of Metasurfaces”, Small Methods, vol. 1, Mar. 24, 2017, pp. 1600064-1-1600064-20.
Jang et al., “Wavefront Shaping with Disorder-Engineered Metasurfaces”, Nature Photonics, 2018, 8 pgs.
Karagodsky et al., “Monolithically Integrated Multi-Wavelength VCSEL Arrays Using High-Contrast Gratings”, Optics Express, vol. 18, No. 2, Jan. 18, 2010, pp. 694-699, doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.000694.
Khorasaninejad et al., “Silicon Nanofin Grating as a Miniature Chirality-Distinguishing Beam-Splitter”, Nature Communications, vol. 5, No. 5386, Nov. 12, 2014, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1038/ncomms6386.
Lee et al., “Giant Nonlinear Response from Plasmonic Metasurfaces Coupled to Intersubband Transitions”, Nature, vol. 511, Jul. 3, 2014, pp. 65-69.
Li et al., “All-Silicon Nanorod-Based Dammann Gratings”, Optics Letters, vol. 40, No. 18, Sep. 15, 2015, pp. 4285-4288.
Li et al., “Broadband Diodelike Asymmetric Transmission of Linearly Polarized Light in Ultrathin Hybrid Metamaterial”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 105, Nov. 19, 2014, pp. 201103-1-201103-5, doi: 10.1063/1.4902162.
Li et al., “Dispersion Controlling Meta-Lens at Visible Frequency”, Optics Express, vol. 25, No. 18, Sep. 4, 2017, pp. 21419-21427.
Li et al., “Metalens-Based Miniaturized Optical Systems”, Micromachines, May 8, 2019, vol. 10, No. 310, pp. 1-21, doi: 10.3390/mi10050310.
Liu et al., “Single-Pixel Computational Ghost Imaging with Helicity-Dependent Metasurface Hologram”, Science Advances, vol. 3, No. E1701477, Sep. 8, 2017, pp. 1-6.
Mackus et al., “The Use of Atomic Layer Deposition in Advanced Nanopatterning”, Nanoscale, vol. 6, Jul. 25, 2014, 10941-10960.
Meng et al., “A Novel Nanofabrication Technique of Silicon-Based Nanostructures”, Nanoscale Research Letters vol. 11, No. 504, pp. 1-9, doi:10.1186/s11671-016-1702-4.
Orazbayev et al., “Tunable Beam Steering Enabled by Graphene Metamaterials”, Optics Express, vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 8848-8861, doi: 10.1364/OE.24.008848.
Pfeiffer et al., “Cascaded Metasurfaces for Complete Phase and Polarization Control”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 102, Jun. 11, 2013, pp. 231116-1-231116-4, doi: 10.1063/1.4810873.
Redding et al., “Full-Field Interferometric Confocal Microscopy Using a VCSEL Array”, Optics Letters, vol. 39, No. 15, Aug. 1, 2014 , 11 pgs.
Roy et al., “Sub-Wavelength Focusing Meta-Lens”, Optics Express, vol. 21, No. 6, Mar. 25, 2013, pp. 7577-7582.
Sayyah et al., “Two-Dimensional Pseudo-Random Optical Phased Array Based on Tandem Optical Injection Locking of Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers”, Optics Express vol. 23, No. 15, Jul. 27, 2015, pp. 19405-19416, doi: 10.1364/OE.23.019405l.
Schulz et al., “Quantifying the Impact of Proximity Error Correction on Plasmonic Metasurfaces”, Optical Materials Express, vol. 5, No. 12, Dec. 1, 2015, pp. 2798-2803, doi: 10.1364/OME.5.002798.
Sell et al., “Periodic Dielectric Metasurfaces with High-Efficiency, Multiwavelength Functionalities”, Advanced Optical Materials, 2017, 16 pages, doi: 10.1002/adom.201700645.
Seurin et al., “High-Efficiency VCSEL Arrays for Illumination and Sensing in Consumer Applications”, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 9766, 2016, pp. 97660D-1-97660D-9, doi: 10.1117/12.2213295.
Shim et al., “Hard-Tip, Soft-Spring Lithography”, Nature, vol. 469, Jan. 27, 2011, pp. 516-521.
Silvestri et al., “Robust Design Procedure for Dielectric Resonator Metasurface Lens Array”, Optics Express, vol. 24, No. 25, Dec. 12, 2016, pp. 29153-29169.
Song et al., “Vividly-Colored Silicon Metasurface Based on Collective Electric and Magnetic Resonances”, IEEE, Jan. 11, 2016, 2 pgs.
Voelkel et al., “Laser Beam Homogenizing: Limitations and Constraints”, DPIE, Europe, Optical Systems Design, 2008, 12 pgs.
Voelz, , “Chapter 6: Transmittance Functions, Lenses, and Gratings”, pp. 89-111.
Wang et al., “Broadband Achromatic Optical Metasurface Devices”, Nature Communications, vol. 8, No. 187, Aug. 4, 2017, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00166-7.
Wen et al., “Metasurface for Characterization of the Polarization State of Light”, Optics Express, vol. 23, No. 8, 2015, pp. 10272-10281, DOI:10.1364/OE.23.010272.
Xu et al., “Metasurface External Cavity Laser”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 107, No. 221105, 2015, pp. 221105-1-221105-5, doi: 10.1063/1.4936887.
Yu et al., “Optical Metasurfaces and Prospect of their Applications Including Fiber Optics”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2015, vol. 33, No. 12, pp. 2344-2358.
Zhao et al., “Recent Advances on Optical Metasurfaces”, Journal of Optics, Institute of Physics Publishing, vol. 16, Issue 12, 2014, 14 pages, doi: 10.1088/2040489781/16/12/123001.
Zhao et al., “Tailoring the Dispersion of Plasmonic Nanorods to Realize Broadband Optical Meta-Waveplates”, Nano Letter, vol. 13, Feb. 5, 2013, pp. 1086-1091, doi: dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl304392b.
Zhou et al., “Progress on Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Laser Arrays for Infrared Illumination Applications”, Proc. SPIE 9001, Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers XVIII, 90010E, Feb. 27, 2014, 11 pgs.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210263329 A1 Aug 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62693065 Jul 2018 US