The present disclosure relates to metering pump system, and more particularly to fuel metering pump system.
A variety of devices are known for metering fuel. Modern military jet engines typically face serious thermal management concerns with fuel temperatures at tolerable limits. Future engine and airframe systems will likely push performance such that fuel temperatures become the limiting factor. Systems will be required to handle increasing fuel temperatures by minimizing fuel handling leading to increased temperatures. Although conventional methods and systems have generally been considered satisfactory for their intended purpose, there is a need in the art for systems allowing for a significant reduction of motor and controller sizes along with decreased power requirement. There also remains a need in the art for such metering and components that are economically viable. The present disclosure may provide a solution for at least one of these remaining challenges.
A fuel system, which can be part of an aircraft, includes a fuel tank, a first pump fluidly coupled to the fuel tank configured for distributing fuel from the fuel tank throughout the fuel system, and a second pump fluidly coupled to the first pump by a pressure regulating valve and configured for metering fuel to an engine. The first pump can be a non-positive displacement pump, such as a shaft driven centrifugal pump with a throttling type regulating valve. The first pump can also be a positive displacement pump with a bypassing pressure regulating valve to bypass flow from the pump outlet to the pump inlet, thereby making the system a pressure-raising device.
The second pump can be a positive displacement pump, electrically driven by an electric motor and independent of the first pump. The second pump can meter flow to a gas turbine engine and metered flow will be proportional to pump speed. The first pump can be sized to provide more pressure than the second pump, approximately provide 10-15 times the pressure of the second pump. A mass flow meter can be located downstream of the second pump configured to provide feedback to a speed control of the second pump and to trim a steady-state fuel delivery to improve the accuracy. The mass flow meter can further be used for system health monitoring to determine pump health.
The pressure regulating valve can be hydro-mechanically controlled and be configured to regulate a pressure rise across the second pump by either throttling the first pump discharge if it is a centrifugal pump or bypassing some of the first pump flow if it is a positive displacement pump.
These and other features of the systems and methods of the subject disclosure will become more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the drawings.
So that those skilled in the art to which the subject invention appertains will readily understand how to make and use the devices and methods of the subject invention without undue experimentation, preferred embodiments thereof will be described in detail herein below with reference to certain figures, wherein:
Reference will now be made to the drawings wherein like reference numerals identify similar structural features or aspects of the subject invention. For purposes of explanation and illustration, and not limitation, a partial view of an exemplary embodiment of a metering system in accordance with the invention is shown in
As shown in
The second pump 106 in both systems 100 and 200 is a positive displacement pump, electrically driven by an electric motor 114 and independent of the first pump 104. Flow delivered by the second pump is proportional to pump rotational speed. The first pump 104 is sized to provide more pressure than the second pump 106, approximately provide 10-15 times the pressure of the second pump 106. Thus significant power associated with raising the fuel pressure for delivery to the gas generator is offloaded to the mechanically-driven high-speed first pump stage 104. The fixed pressure rise provided by regulator 108 across the second pump 106 enables increased accuracy in open loop fuel metering control by reducing variation in volumetric efficiency. A mass flow meter 110 is located downstream of the second pump 106 in order to provide feedback to a speed control of the second pump 106 and to trim a steady-state fuel delivery to improve the accuracy and provide shutoff functionality. The mass flow meter 110 can further be used for system health monitoring to determine pump health.
The pressure regulating valve 108 is hydro-mechanically controlled and regulates a constant pressure rise across the second pump 106. The pressure regulating valve 108 can be either a throttling type regulator if the first pump 104 is a centrifugal type pump (as shown in
The arrangement enables simplification of fuel metering by eliminating a metering valve within the system. Fuel system power is also reduced relative to a single gearbox driven pump at heat management critical conditions such as idle and cruise since the second pump 106 delivers only the flow demand for the engine 112 while reducing the pressure rise required by the first pump at its sizing condition thus reducing pump parasitic losses at off design conditions. Significant reduction in electric motor and controller size for the second pump 106 compared to an architecture that requires that a metering pump alone generate required discharge pressure. The significant power associated with raising the fuel pressure for delivery to the gas generator is offloaded to the mechanically-driven high-speed main stage 104, thereby greatly reducing the electrical power needed to drive the second pump 106.
The methods and systems of the present disclosure, as described above and shown in the drawings, provide for a fuel metering system with superior properties including improved efficiency reducing fuel system heat rejection and fuel temperature. While the apparatus and methods of the subject disclosure have been showing and described with reference to embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that changes and/or modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and score of the subject disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2653543 | Mott | Sep 1953 | A |
3908360 | Meyer et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3946551 | Linebrink | Mar 1976 | A |
4208871 | Riple, Jr. | Jun 1980 | A |
6675570 | Herbison | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7347050 | Gainford | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7836676 | Futa, Jr. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
9140190 | Portolese | Sep 2015 | B2 |
10267237 | Pool | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10317082 | McBrien | Jun 2019 | B2 |
11060461 | Turney | Jul 2021 | B2 |
20010054290 | Herbison et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20050268972 | Gainford | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080296403 | Futa, Jr. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100126136 | Anson | May 2010 | A1 |
20100242431 | Baker | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120271527 | Zebrowski | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130327044 | Portolese | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140196463 | Zielinski et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20160047550 | McBrien | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160084272 | Mueller et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160146108 | Yates et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160245188 | Selstad | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160265444 | Pool | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170101935 | Waissi et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170167387 | Weir et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170306856 | Bickley | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180045122 | Veilleux | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20190257250 | Veilleux, Jr. et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1662117 | May 2006 | EP |
3228847 | Oct 2017 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Extended European search report issued in corresponding EP aplication No. 21155521.4, dated Jun. 24, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210239054 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |