Claims
- 1. In a method of oxidizing isobutylene, at temperature of 350.degree.-550.degree. C in the vapor phase, the principal product, being methacrolein, the improvement of conducting said oxidation in the presence of a particulate calcined catalyst in the form of a metal oxide catalyst on a support consisting essentially of expanded perlite having, prior to formation and calcination of the catalyst, a total surface area of less than 15 m.sup.2 /g., a total porosity of at least 2.5 cc./g., at least 40 percent of the pores being greater than 100,000 A in diameter, and no more than 25 percent of the pores being less than 100,000 A in diameter.
- 2. The method of claim 1 in which said surface area is less than 10 m.sup.2 /g., the total porosity is at least about 2.8 cc./g., at least about 55 percent of the pores are greater than 100,000 A in diameter, and no more than about 15 percent of the pores are less than 10,000 A in diameter.
- 3. The method of claim 1 in which the total surface area is less than 5 m.sup.2 /g., the total porosity is greater than about 3 cc./g., at least about 60 percent of the pore volume exists as pores larger than 100,000 A, and no more than about 10 percent of the pore volume is present as pores of less than 10,000 A in size.
- 4. The method of claim 1 in which catalyst is based on an oxide combination selected from Co--Mo; Fe--Mo; Bi--Mo; Bi--Fe; Sb--U; --Fe, --Mn, --Th, --Ce, --Mo--, or --Sn; Mo--Zn or --Cd; Mo--Th; Mo--P; Cu--Te; Mo--Ca or --Mg; and combinations thereof.
- 5. The method of claim 2 in which the catalyst is based on an oxide combination selected from Co--Mo; Fe--Mo; Bi--Mo; Bi--Fe; Sb--U, --Fe, --Mn, --Th, --Ce, --Mo, or --Sn; Mo--Zn or --Cd; Mo--Th; Mo--P; Cu--Te; Mo--Ca or --Mg; and combinations thereof.
- 6. The method of claim 3 in which the catalyst is based on an oxide combination selected from Co--Mo; Fe--Mo; Bi--Mo; Bi--Fe; Sb--U, --Fe, --Mn, --Th, --Ce, --Mo, or --Sn; Mo--Zn or --Cd; Mo--Th; Mo--P; Cu--Te; Mo--Ca or --Mg; and combinations thereof.
- 7. The method of claim 4 in which the catalyst is based on Co--Mo, Fe--Mo, or mixtures thereof.
- 8. The method of claim 5 in which the catalyst is based on Co--Mo, Fe--Mo, or mixtures thereof.
- 9. The method of claim 6 in which the catalyst is based on Co--Mo, Fe--Mo, or mixtures thereof.
- 10. The method of claim 3 in which the catalyst is based on one having the empirical formula Mo.sub.6-24 Co.sub.1-16, optionally with small amounts of activators or promoters, the perlite being smaller than 325 mesh.
- 11. The method of claim 3 in which the catalyst is based on one having the empirical formula Mo.sub.12 Fe.sub.0.1-12 Bi.sub.0.1-12, optionally with small amounts of promoters or activators, the perlite being smaller than 325 mesh.
- 12. The method of claim 3 in which the catalyst is based on one having the empirical formula Mo.sub.12 Bi.sub.0.1-12, optionally having small amounts of promotors or activators, the perlite being smaller than 325 mesh.
- 13. The method of claim 3 in which the catalyst is based on one having the empirical formula Mo.sub.12 Fe.sub.2-12, optionally having small amounts of activators or promotors, the perlite being smaller than 325 mesh.
Parent Case Info
This is a division of application Ser. No. 178,434 filed Sept. 7, 1971 now U.S. Pat. No. 3,839,227, and a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 149,343 filed June 2, 1971 now abandoned.
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
2974161 |
Keith et al. |
Mar 1961 |
|
3098102 |
Bethell et al. |
Jul 1963 |
|
3308070 |
Miller |
Mar 1967 |
|
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry |
Takamasa et al., Chem. Abst., Vol. 71, item 129218x, 1969. |
Divisions (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
178434 |
Sep 1971 |
|