The invention concerns in general the technical field of an elevator technology. Especially the invention concerns enhancing the safety of the elevators.
Typically an elevator comprises an elevator car and a hoisting machine configured to drive the elevator car in an elevator shaft between landings. Speed of the elevator car should be proportioned such that the elevator car may be stopped at a desired floor or landing. For a safety reason, the speed of the elevator car is monitored. If the elevator car is detected to move at an overspeed the movement of the elevator car is instructed to be decelerated or stopped. In particular, the speed monitoring is important in case of service drive or electrical rescue drive function (RDF) from the safety aspect.
For example, in case of a power failure brakes of the elevator car are activated in order to stop the movement of the elevator car. In a manual rescue drive the brakes are manually released in order to move the elevator car to a landing and the speed of the elevator car may be manually monitored while the elevator car is moving. In the electrical rescue drive function the electric brakes may be electrically released and an automatic monitoring for the overspeed of the elevator car may be required.
During the service drive or electrical rescue drive function the overspeed monitoring is required to be at least two-channel monitoring. Furthermore, the overspeed monitoring is required to be implemented by means of a component that fulfills the accuracy requirements. A Safety Integrity Level (SIL) may be used to indicate a tolerable failure rate of a particular safety function, for example a safety component. SIL is defined as a relative level of risk-reduction provided by the safety function, or to specify a target level of risk reduction. SIL has a number scheme from 1 to 4 to represent its levels. The higher the SIL level is, the greater the impact of a failure is and the lower the failure rate that is acceptable is.
According to a prior art solution the speed of the elevator car may be monitored by monitoring the speed of the elevator car obtained by means of a motor encoder or an absolute position sensor connected to the elevator car, for example. However, one drawback of the prior art solution may be that the SIL level of the overspeed monitoring is too low, for example 2 or less. Furthermore, the monitoring may not be two-channel monitoring. According to another example of prior art solution a two-channel monitoring may be provided at door zones of the elevator shaft. One drawback of such prior art solution is that the overspeed monitoring is provided only within a part of the elevator shaft. Thus, there is a need to develop further solutions for improving the safety of the elevator systems.
An objective of the invention is to present a method, a safety control unit, and an elevator system for verifying speed data of an elevator car. Another objective of the invention is that the method, the safety control unit, and the elevator system for verifying speed data of an elevator car improve the safety of the elevator system.
The objectives of the invention are reached by a method, a safety control unit, and an elevator system as defined by the respective independent claims.
According to a first aspect, a method for verifying speed data of an elevator car for overspeed monitoring of the elevator car is provided, the method comprising: obtaining at least one continuous speed data of the elevator car at two channels; obtaining a zone speed data of the elevator car within at least one zone of an elevator shaft at two channels; generating a two-channel verified speed information by verifying the validity of the at least one continuous speed data by comparing the said at least one continuous speed data to the zone speed data at least at one channel, preferably at both channels, when the zone speed data is available; generating a control signal for a safety device, if the comparison indicates a mismatch between the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at least at one channel in which the comparison is provided; and if the comparison indicates a match between the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at each of the at least one channel in which the comparison is provided, the method further comprising: comparing the verified speed information at each channel between each other by reciprocal comparison; and generating the control signal for the safety device, if the reciprocal comparison indicates a mismatch between the verified speed information at the channels.
Alternatively or in addition, if the reciprocal comparison indicates a match between the verified speed information at the channels, the method may further comprise: determining if the verified speed information meets a predetermined overspeed limit at least at one channel; and generating the control signal for the safety device, if the verified speed data meets the predetermined overspeed limit at least at one channel.
Alternatively, if two or more continuous speed data of the elevator car at least at one channel are obtained, the method may further comprise: comparing continuously the two or more continuous speed data with each other at least at one channel; and generating the control signal for the safety device, if the comparison indicates a mismatch between the two or more continuous speed data at least at one channel.
The zone speed data may obtained by means of at least one Hall sensor at each channel and at least one magnet at the zone. The at least one zone of the elevator shaft may be a door zone.
The at least one continuous speed data of the elevator car may be obtained by means of at least one of the following: at least one accelerometer, at least one encoder mounted in a hoisting motor.
The control signal may comprise an instruction to stop the movement of the elevator car.
According to a second aspect, a safety control unit for verifying speed data of an elevator car for overspeed monitoring of the elevator car is provided, wherein the safety control unit is communicatively coupled to a safety device, the safety control unit comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory storing at least one portion of computer program code, wherein the at least one processor being configured to cause the elevator control unit at least to perform: obtain at least one continuous speed data of the elevator car at two channels; obtain a zone speed data of the elevator car within at least one zone of an elevator shaft at two channels; generate a two-channel verified speed information by verifying the validity of the at least one continuous speed data by comparing the said at least one continuous speed data to the zone speed data at least at one channel, preferably at both channels, when the zone speed data is available; generate a control signal for a safety device, if the comparison indicates a mismatch between the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at least at one channel in which the comparison is provided; and if the comparison indicates a match between the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at each of the at least one channel in which the comparison is provided, the safety control unit is further configured to: compare the verified speed information at each channel between each other by reciprocal comparison; and generate the control signal for the safety device, if the reciprocal comparison indicates a mismatch between the verified speed information at the channels.
Alternatively or in addition, if the reciprocal comparison indicates a match between the verified speed information at the channels, the safety control unit may further be configured to: determine if the verified speed information meets a predetermined overspeed limit at least at one channel; and generate the control signal for the safety device, if the verified speed data meets the predetermined overspeed limit at least at one channel.
Alternatively, if two or more continuous speed data of the elevator car at least at one channel are obtained, the safety control unit may further be configured to: compare continuously the two or more continuous speed data with each other at least at one channel; and generate the control signal for the safety device, if the comparison indicates a mismatch between the two or more continuous speed data at least at one channel.
The zone speed data may be determined by means of at least one Hall sensor at each channel and at least one magnet at the zone. The at least one zone of the elevator shaft may be a door zone.
The obtained at least one continuous speed data of the elevator car may be obtained by means of at least one of the following: at least one accelerometer, at least one encoder mounted in a hoisting motor.
The control signal may comprise an instruction to stop the movement of the elevator car.
According to a third aspect, an elevator system for verifying speed data of an elevator car for overspeed monitoring of the elevator car is provided, the elevator system comprising: a safety device for controlling the movement of the elevator car; at least one sensor unit; a safety control unit configured to: obtain at least one continuous speed data of the elevator car at two channels from at least one sensor unit; obtain a zone speed data of the elevator car within at least one zone of an elevator shaft at two channels from at least one sensor unit; generate a two-channel verified speed information by verifying the validity of the at least one continuous speed data by comparing the said at least one continuous speed data to the zone speed data at least at one channel, preferably at both channels, when the zone speed data is available; generate a control signal for the safety device, if the comparison indicates a mismatch between the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at least at one channel in which the comparison is provided; and if the comparison indicates a match between the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at each of the at least one channel in which the comparison is provided, the safety control unit is further configured to: compare the verified speed information at each channel between each other by reciprocal comparison; and generate the control signal for the safety device, if the reciprocal comparison indicates a mismatch between the verified speed information at the channels, wherein the safety control unit, the at least one sensor unit and the safety device are communicatively coupled to each other, and wherein the safety control unit is configured to deliver the generated control signal to the safety device.
The exemplary embodiments of the invention presented in this patent application are not to be interpreted to pose limitations to the applicability of the appended claims. The verb “to comprise” is used in this patent application as an open limitation that does not exclude the existence of also un-recited features. The features recited in depending claims are mutually freely combinable unless otherwise explicitly stated.
The novel features which are considered as characteristic of the invention are set forth in particular in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, both as to its construction and its method of operation, together with additional objectives and advantages thereof, will be best understood from the following description of specific embodiments when read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings.
Next an example of the method according to the invention is described by referring to
The at least one continuous speed data of the elevator car may be obtained continuously regardless of the place of the elevator car in the elevator shaft. The at least one continuous speed data of the elevator car may be obtained, for example, by means of at least one of the following: at least one accelerometer, at least one encoder mounted in a hoisting motor. The at least one continuous speed data may be obtained by means of the at least one accelerometer or at least one encoder mounted in a hoisting motor with some known manner. The at least one sensor unit 106 that may be fixed to the elevator car may comprise the at least one accelerometer as will be described later. Alternatively or in addition, the at least one sensor unit 108 may comprise the at least one encoder mounted in the hoisting motor. The continuous speed data may be obtained directly from the at least one encoder as illustrated in
The zone speed data may be obtained only within at least one zone of an elevator shaft. Hence, the zone speed data is not available continuously along the elevator shaft. The zone speed data is available only within at least one zone of an elevator shaft. The at least one zone of the elevator shaft may be a door zone. The door zone may be defined as a zone extending from a lower limit below floor level to an upper limit above the floor level in which the landing and car door equipment are in mesh and operable. The door zone may be determined to be from −400 mm to +400 mm for example. Preferably, the door zone may be from −150 mm to +150 mm. The at zone speed data may be obtained by means of at least one Hall sensor at each channel and the at least one magnet at the zone. The at least one sensor unit 106 that may be fixed to the elevator car may comprise the at least one Hall sensor as will be described later. The zone speed data at each channel is obtained by means of a different at least one Hall sensor. The zone speed data at a zone may be obtained with some known manner from a parameter obtained from the at least one Hall sensor. For example, obtaining a voltage from the at least one Hall sensor of the sensor unit. The obtained voltage is dependent on the at least one Hall sensor bypassing the at least one magnet at the said zone. Alternatively, the zone speed data may be defined from a rate of change of a linear position of the elevator car 102 obtained by the at least one Hall sensor as the elevator car 102 comprising the sensor unit 106 bypasses the at least one magnet at the said zone.
The zone speed data may be considered as substantially accurate and reliable speed information of the elevator car. The at least one continuous speed information, in turn, may not be considered as reliable and as accurate speed information of the elevator car as the zone speed data. However, the zone speed data is available only within the at least one zone of an elevator shaft.
At the step 206, a two-channel verified speed information is generated by verifying the validity of the at least one continuous speed data. The validity of the at least one continuous speed data is verified by comparing the said at least one continuous speed data to the zone speed data at least at one channel, preferably at both channels. The verified speed information is continuous speed information, which is confirmed to be valid in comparison with the zone speed data. The zone speed data is considered to be substantially accurate and reliable, thus the verified speed information may also be considered to be substantially accurate and reliable. The comparison may be done only, when the zone speed data is available. The zone speed data is available only when the elevator car is within the at least one zone. In the comparison at the step 206 the zone speed data is compared to the at least one continuous speed data at the same moment of time. The two-channel verified data may be provided by the comparison at step 206, which may be done at least at one channel. Alternatively, the two-channel verified data may be provided by the comparison at step 206, which may be done separately at the two channels, so that the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at channel one are compared with each other and the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at channel two are compared with each other. Thus, the two-channel verified speed information may comprise confirmed continuous speed data at both channels or alternatively at one channel. If the comparison indicates a mismatch between the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at least at one channel in which the comparison is provided, a control signal for a safety device is generated at step 208. If a control signal is generated the steps 210-212 are not performed. Alternatively, if the comparison indicates a match between the zone speed data and the at least one continuous speed data at each of the at least one channel in which the comparison is provided, the verified speed information at each channel are compared with each other by reciprocal comparison at the step 210. If the reciprocal comparison indicates a mismatch between the verified speed information at the channels, the control signal is generated for the safety device at the step 208.
Alternatively or in addition, if the reciprocal comparison indicates a match between the verified speed information at the channels, it may be determined does the verified speed information meets a predetermined overspeed limit at least at one channel at the step 212. If the verified speed data meets the predetermined overspeed limit at least at one channel, the control signal for a safety device is generated at the step 208. The predetermined overspeed limit may be defined to be a certain percent, such as 120 percent for example, of the nominal speed of the elevator car. Preferably the overspeed limit is below safety device trigger speed.
The steps 210 and 212 may be performed in alternative order, so that either step 210 or step 212 may be performed first.
Additionally, if two or more continuous speed data are obtained from different sources at least at one channel at step 202, the two or more continuous speed data may be compared continuously with each other at least at one channel. If the comparison indicates a mismatch between the two or more continuous speed data at least at one channel, the control signal for a safety device is generated. If a control signal is generated the following steps are not performed. Alternatively, if the comparison indicates a match between the two or more continuous speed data at least at one channel, the method continues so that at least one of the two or more continuous speed data are compared to the zone speed data at step 206.
The control signal may comprise an instruction for the safety device 110 to stop the movement of the elevator car 102. The safety device 110 is configured to control the movement of the elevator car 102.
A schematic example of the safety control unit 104 according to the invention is disclosed in
The processor 302 of the safety control unit 104 is at least configured to implement at least some method steps as described. The implementation of the method may be achieved by arranging the processor 302 to execute at least some portion of computer program code 305a-305n stored in the memory 304 causing the processor 302, and thus the safety control unit 104, to implement one or more method steps as described. The processor 302 is thus arranged to access the memory 304 and retrieve and store any information therefrom and thereto. For sake of clarity, the processor 302 herein refers to any unit suitable for processing information and control the operation of the safety control unit 104, among other tasks. The operations may also be implemented with a microcontroller solution with embedded software. Similarly, the memory 304 is not limited to a certain type of memory only, but any memory type suitable for storing the described pieces of information may be applied in the context of the present invention.
As described earlier the elevator system 100 according to the invention may comprise at least one sensor unit 106, 108. The at least one sensor unit may be fixed to the elevator car 102 as the sensor unit 106 in
Alternatively or in addition, the sensor unit 106 may further comprise at least one processor 206a, 206b at each channel to provide the speed data of the elevator car at each channel. Alternatively, the sensor unit 106 may comprise one common processor to provide the speed data of the elevator car at the both channels. For sake of clarity, the at least one processor 206a, 206b herein refers to any unit suitable for processing information and control the operation of the sensor unit 106, among other tasks. The operations may also be implemented with a microcontroller solution with embedded software.
Alternatively or in addition, the sensor unit 106 may further comprise at least one serial bus 208a, 208b, at each channel to communicatively couple the sensor unit 106 to the safety control unit 104. Furthermore, the sensor unit 106 may comprise one or more memories being volatile or non-volatile for storing portions of computer program code and any data values. The memory is not limited to a certain type of memory only, but any memory type suitable for storing the pieces of information may be applied in the context of the present invention.
The verb “match” in context of comparison is used in this patent application to mean that the data values under comparison differ from each other less than a predetermined limit. The predetermined limit may be defined so that a desirable SIL level may be reached, for example.
The verb “mismatch” in context of comparison is used in this patent application to mean that the data values under comparison differ from each other more than the predetermined limit.
The verb “meet” in context of an overspeed limit is used in this patent application to mean that a predefined condition is fulfilled. For example, the predefined condition may be that the overspeed limit is reached and/or exceeded.
The present invention as hereby described provides great advantages over the prior art solutions. For example, the present invention improves at least partly the safety of the elevators. Furthermore, the present invention enables two-channel SIL3 level overspeed monitoring of the elevator car during a service drive and an electrical rescue drive function (RDF).
The specific examples provided in the description given above should not be construed as limiting the applicability and/or the interpretation of the appended claims. Lists and groups of examples provided in the description given above are not exhaustive unless otherwise explicitly stated.
This application is a continuation of PCT International Application No. PCT/FI2016/050198 which has an International filing date of Mar. 30, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20080135342 | Thumm | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080202862 | Dudde | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090255762 | Ketonen | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110147135 | Birrer et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20150014098 | Stolzl et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150083528 | Kattainen | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150274487 | Annen et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20180162684 | Hsu | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180229965 | Kattainen | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190010024 | Kattainen | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190248625 | Mustonen | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190352130 | Jussila | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200198929 | Michel | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20210309487 | Kauppinen | Oct 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101023016 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101094802 | Dec 2007 | CN |
100415625 | Sep 2008 | CN |
102666341 | Sep 2012 | CN |
104718148 | Jun 2015 | CN |
1602610 | Dec 2005 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019, issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201680084212.X. |
International Search Report PCT/ISA/210 for International Application No. PCT/FI2016/050198 dated Jul. 13, 2016. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority PCT/ISA/237 for International Application No. PCT/FI2016/050198 dated Jul. 13, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190010024 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/FI2016/050198 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 16131170 | US |