The present invention relates to a method, an apparatus and a rotor for homogenizing a medium. The invention may be utilized in all areas of industry where mere homogenization of a medium or mixing of at least two flowing media are needed. A preferred application of the invention can be found in the pulp- and paper-making industry where various chemicals have to be mixed with fiber suspensions.
In the following, prior art mixing apparatus of the pulp and paper industry have been discussed as examples of known techniques of mixing a flowing medium to another. However, it should be understood that in spite of the fact that only mixers of the pulp and paper industry have been discussed, it has not been done for the purpose of limiting the scope of the present invention to these fields of industry.
A widely used example of chemical mixers for pulp has been discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,279,709, which discloses a method of treating a fiber suspension having a consistency of 5-25% in an apparatus within a fiber suspension transfer line. The apparatus comprises a chamber having an axis in the direction of flow of the fiber suspension, a suspension inlet and a suspension outlet having an axis in alignment with the chamber axis, and a fluidizing rotor having an axis of rotation transverse to the direction of flow and being disposed within the chamber for rotation therein. The rotor comprises blades, each blade having a proximal and distal end and the blades diverging from the proximal end and extending in spaced relation from the axis of rotation along an axial length thereof. The method comprises feeding the suspension from the suspension transfer line through the inlet into the chamber, introducing chemicals into the fiber suspension upstream of the fluidizing rotor, rotating the fluidizing rotor within the chamber so as to form an open center bounded by a surface of revolution and subjecting the suspension moving toward the outlet to a shear force field sufficient to fluidize the suspension, to mix the chemicals evenly into the suspension and to render the suspension flowable, flowing the suspension through the open center of the rotor, and discharging the suspension from the chamber through the suspension outlet.
The above-described mixer has found a number of imitations, of which, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,575,559 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,918,978 can be mentioned.
All the above-discussed mixers have a few features in common. The rotor is brought into the mixing chamber in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the flow through the mixing chamber. The rotor is formed of finger-like blades, which leave the center of the rotor open. The rotor shaft and the rotor blades are arranged such that the mixing chamber with the rotor installed does not form a symmetrical mixing space, but an asymmetrical one, where the turbulence created by the rotor is not optimal. The result is that the mixing of the chemical with the fiber suspension is not even, but in some areas of the mixer the turbulence level is higher, resulting in more even mixing than in areas where the turbulence level is lower.
There is yet another mixer where the transverse rotor construction has been used. The mixer has been discussed in EP-B2-0 606 250. Here the mixer for admixing a treatment agent to a pulp suspension having a consistency of 10-25% comprises a cylindrical housing with a mixing chamber defined between an inner wall of the cylindrical housing and a casing of a coaxially mounted, substantially cylindrical rotor provided with mixing members on its casing surface, an inlet in the housing for supplying pulp to the mixing chamber, an inlet in the housing for supplying treatment agent to the mixing chamber and an outlet for withdrawing mixed pulp and treatment agent, a mixing zone in the housing provided with stationary mixing members wherein a gap is defined between the mixing members of the rotor and the stationary mixing members. The mixing chamber and the mixing zone have a width corresponding to the axial length of the rotor. The stationary mixing members are arranged on a portion within an angle of 15-180 degrees of the inner wall of the housing. The pulp inlet and the treatment agent inlet extend along the entire width of the mixing chamber for adding the pulp and the treatment agent each in well-formed thin layers. The inlet for the treatment agent is connected to the mixing chamber at a circumferential position prior to the mixing zone. The outlet extends along the entire width of the mixing chamber, and a cylindrical surface is formed directly after the outlet to prevent pulp from flowing backward past the rotor. In other words, the mixer of the EP patent has a closed cylindrical rotor with solid mixing members on the rotor surface. The cylindrical rotor is positioned in a cylindrical mixing chamber. The basic idea in the EP document is to feed both pulp and the chemical as thin layers in the mixing zone between the rotor and the chamber wall and mix such there.
However, based on practical experiences it has been learned that the mixing is not very efficient in the narrow slot between the rotor and the mixing chamber. Also, it has been learned that the energy consumption of this type of mixer is high compared, for instance, to the mixer discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,279,709 mentioned first.
At least some of the problems of the prior art mixers, and homogenizers, by which are understood devices which subject a medium to such a turbulence that the homogeneity of the medium is improved irrespective of whether another medium is to be mixed with the first medium or whether only the homogeneity of the first medium is to be improved, are solved by means of the present invention, an essential feature of which is the circulation of the medium in both the radial and the axial directions in the mixing chamber. Preferably the circulation of the medium should be symmetrical in relation to the centerline of the mixing chamber.
Another preferred but not necessarily an essential feature of the present invention is the symmetry of the mixing chamber and/or the rotor in relation to the centerline of the mixing chamber.
Yet another preferred feature of the invention is that the center of the mixer rotor is at least partially closed so that both a direct flow through the rotor and collection of gas at the center of the rotor are prevented.
The method, the apparatus and the rotor of the present invention will be described in more detail in the following with reference to various embodiments of the present invention and to the accompanying drawings.
The operation of the apparatus is such that the fiber suspension flow, for instance, from a fluidizing centrifugal pump, is introduced to chamber 13 through inlet 14 and simultaneously chemicals are fed through opening 23, either located in connection with the mixer chamber or somewhere upstream thereof, to the fiber suspension. The fluidizing element, i.e. the rotor, while rapidly rotating, causes the fiber suspension to break into small fiber flocs whereby the chemicals are mixed with the suspension.
The substantially cylindrical wall of the housing 32 is provided with the inlet opening 340, and the outlet opening 360, as explained above. Both the inlet and the outlet openings are, preferably, of such a shape that they both have a center and an axis of symmetry, which lie substantially in the same plane. This plane of symmetry, so-called centerline plane CLP, runs along the centerline of the housing perpendicular to the axis AH of the housing. The centerline plane of the openings coincides with a centerline plane of the housing, which runs at an equal distance from the end caps 40, and 42. However, it has to be understood that if, for instance, for manufacturing or other corresponding reasons, the line running via the centers of the inlet and the outlet openings does not exactly coincide with the centerline of the housing but is still very close thereto, or is not exactly perpendicular to the housing axis AH, but the operation of the rotor and the openings results in substantially symmetrical turbulence fields within the housing, the location of the openings should be considered as fulfilling the requirements of this invention.
The rotor 38 has a shaft 44 running through the mixer housing 32 so that the end 46 of the shaft 44 is positioned at a short distance from the end cap 42. The distance from the inner surface of the end cap to the end surface of the shaft is of the order of a few millimeters, preferably 1-5 millimeters. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the shaft 44 extends from one end of the housing 32 to the second end of the housing. In broader terms, the gap between the shaft end surface and the end cap 42 is such that it does not change the flow behavior of the pulp within the mixing chamber to a significant degree. Thereby the allowable size of the gap depends, for instance, on the consistency of the pulp to be treated.
According to another optional embodiment of the invention the end cap at the second end of the housing is provided with a member protruding axially towards the shaft such that a similar gap is left between the shaft end and the member as discussed above. The diameter and overall shape of the member correspond to that of the rotor shaft to fulfill the requirements of symmetry. The member could also be tubular such that an end part of the shaft extends inside the member whereby the shaft end part should, preferably, be provided with a smaller diameter so that the outer diameter of the tubular member corresponds to the full diameter of the shaft.
As a further optional embodiment the member may extend from the second end cap at a close proximity to the first end cap whereby the rotor shaft terminates near the first end cap, whereby the rotor blades are attached to their shaft only at their first end. In this optional structure it has to be ensured that the symmetry is maintained by designing the opposite end of the rotor-housing combination such that it corresponds to the first end thereof.
As a yet further option a structure can be mentioned where an opening for the shaft 44 has been arranged in the other end cap 42, too. The opening should, at least, be provided with the necessary sealing, and possibly the end cap 42 with bearings for supporting the shaft end.
Another feature of the invention is that the diameter of the shaft 44 is of significant magnitude compared to the diameter of the housing 32. The purpose of the size, shape and location of the shaft 44 is to ensure that the center of the housing is closed whereby gas cannot collect there. This is accomplished by arranging no or very little volume of lower pressure inside the housing, in the so-called mixing or homogenization chamber where the gas could collect.
The rotor 38 further has a number of blades 48 positioned at a distance from both the rotor shaft 44, and the inner surface of the housing 32. The blades 48 are fastened to the shaft 44 by means of distance members or arms 50. Basically, the shape of the arms has been discussed in connection with FIGS. 10 through 13 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,791,778, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated as a reference herein. The arms are positioned at a substantially equal distance from the centerline plane of the rotor, the centerline of the rotor lying on the centerline plane CLP of the housing. The centerline plane of the rotor could as well be called as a plane of symmetry of the rotor. Thus the part of the rotor within the chamber also fulfils the requirements of symmetry.
The blades 48 as well as the arms 50 have several tasks. Firstly, since it is a question of a mixing or a homogenizing apparatus, it is clear that the main purpose of the apparatus is to act as an efficient turbulence generator. This has been ensured by the following measures:
Secondly, since the device is a rotating member, the purpose of which is to homogenize or to mix a medium or media, the rotating members should not separate gas from the medium. This has been taken into account by filling the rotor center with the shaft 44 and, preferably, designing the cross-section of the rotor blades 48 and arms 50 in as optimal a manner as possible. However, also the economical factors have to be taken into account whereby the most complicated cross-sectional shapes may be out of the question due to their expensive manufacturing methods.
The rotor 138 of this embodiment has several features differing from the ones shown in the embodiment of
The rotor 138 of this embodiment has blades 148 the outer contour of which corresponds, in accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the invention, to the shape of the inner wall of the housing 132. The blades 148 are fastened to the shaft 144 by means of arms 150, which are positioned, preferably, at a certain distance from both the end caps 140, 142, and the centerline plane CLp. The same basic principles as discussed in connection with
The cross-sectional shape of the homogenizing chamber has not been discussed in more detail. It has only been mentioned that it is either cylindrical or rotationally symmetric. However, the homogenizing chamber may, in fact, be of any shape as long as it is substantially symmetric in relation to the centerline plane of the housing or, rather, of the homogenizing chamber, defined earlier. Thus the cross-section thereof may be elliptical or polygonal, just to name a couple of different forms. As to the positioning of the rotor within the homogenizing chamber, there are only two prerequisites. The first prerequisite is that the rotor axis is at least substantially parallel to the housing axis (corresponding to the axis of the homogenizing chamber), either coinciding therewith or being eccentric. The second prerequisite is that the centerline plane of the homogenizing chamber and the centerline plane of the rotor coincide. In fact the disclosure herein talks mainly about a centerline plane irrespective of the plane in question.
Further, the closer structure of the chamber walls has not been discussed yet. The walls may be provided with turbulence elements like pins or bars or stationary blades or ribs, which work more or less together with the blades of the rotor. The size, shape and direction of the elements may change along the length of the chamber, however, keeping in mind that the result of the cooperation of the rotor and the elements on the chamber wall should be a turbulence field, which is symmetrical in relation to the centerline of the housing. Thus the bars or blades on the wall could, for instance, be designed or directed to aid in feeding the medium towards the end caps from the centerline plane.
In a similar manner, the end caps could be provided with turbulence elements like ribs, blades or pins to increase the turbulence in the chamber.
In fact, what is meant by the term “symmetric” in connection with both the rotor and the mixing chamber or the homogenizing chamber is that the shape of the rotor together with the mixing or the homogenizing chamber should be such that the turbulence field created in the chamber is as symmetrical in relation to the centerline plane of the housing as possible. Thus it is possible that the shapes of both the chamber and the rotor deviate somewhat from exactly symmetrical shapes due to, for instance, structures needed for supporting and/or sealing the shaft of the rotor within the first end cap. Also some other slight modifications in either the rotor or the chamber structure, or in both, are possible, as long as the goal, and preferably the result, is a symmetric turbulence field.
The outlet duct 36 departs the housing 32 in a, preferably, tangential direction, but contrary to the inlet duct, in the direction of rotation of the rotor. The purpose of this construction is two-fold: firstly, by streamlining the outlet duct, keeping in mind the hydrodynamic principles, the separation of gas from the medium is prevented, and secondly, the streamlined outlet duct minimizes the pressure losses in the outlet duct, as there is no need to create extra turbulence.
It should, however, be understood that though
Finally, it should be understood that, in the above, only a few preferred embodiments of the invention have been discussed without any intention to limit the scope of the invention to those embodiments only. Thus the scope of the invention is defined only by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04405223 | Apr 2004 | EP | regional |
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/578,444, filed Oct. 13, 2007, which is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/CH2005/000151, filed Mar. 14, 2005, and which claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 04405223.1, filed Apr. 13, 2004, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
443654 | Powers | Dec 1890 | A |
525865 | Rouse et al. | Sep 1894 | A |
946281 | Smith | Jan 1910 | A |
1683500 | Thordarson | Sep 1928 | A |
1774910 | Whatmough | Sep 1930 | A |
1815308 | Liebeck | Jul 1931 | A |
2222230 | Knox | Nov 1940 | A |
2389545 | Pointon | Nov 1945 | A |
4199266 | Giusti | Apr 1980 | A |
4844355 | Kemp et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5575559 | Roll | Nov 1996 | A |
6902314 | Meinander | Jun 2005 | B2 |
20040013032 | Cappellino | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-153744 | May 2002 | JP |
9429514 | Dec 1994 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report mailed Jul. 29, 2005 in Int'l Patent Application No. PCT/CH2005/000151, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/578,444, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed Sep. 29, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/578,444, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 7, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/578,444, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed Aug. 26, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/578,444, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/578,444, 9 pages. |
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 7, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/578,444, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150314252 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11578444 | US | |
Child | 14681048 | US |