This invention concerns a method for removing a hydrate plug, especially for use in connection with so-called multiphase flow relating to petroleum recovery. The invention also comprises a device for practising the method.
So-called multiphase flow, in which hydrocarbons, water and gas flow together in a common pipeline, is gaining increased use in petroleum recovery. Hydrate plugs (ice plugs) are known to form during such flows, and the plugs block through-flow in the pipeline. So-called hydration commonly appears at high pressures and low temperatures. A hydrate plug is particularly prone to form during an unintended shutdown, in which case the flow is disrupted and the fluid in the pipeline has time to cool down more than usual during common production.
When using a floating production and storage vessel, a so-called Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) vessel, hereinafter termed “the vessel”, often relating to petroleum recovery at large sea depths, hydrate plug formations have caused unfortunate operational interruptions.
It is known to provide the pipeline with thermal insulation to counteract hydrate plug formation.
In the pipeline, a hydrate plug normally may not be removed by means of differential pressure acting against the two end surfaces of the hydrate plug. When using such a method, this is due to the risk of equipment and personnel being imperilled when the hydrate plug breaks loose and then is moved at great speed within the pipeline. Thus, it is necessary to maintain a substantially equal pressure at both sides of the hydrate plug while dissolving it by means of heating or chemicals.
It is obvious that it may be difficult to reach the hydrate plug with, for example, chemicals when the hydrate plug blocks the pipeline.
The object of the invention is to remedy the disadvantages of the prior art.
The objective is achieved in accordance with the invention disclosed in the following specification and in the subsequent patent claims.
The free end portion of a pipe, generally in the form of an umbilical being provided with several separate conduits and cables, is connected to a pig. In a sealing manner, the umbilical extends axially through the pig, and the conduits of the umbilical terminate within the pipeline at the pig end portion facing the hydrate plug.
In a preferred embodiment, the pig comprises a somewhat lengthy and flexible body that is shaped in a manner allowing it to be displaced through a pipe bend having a relatively small bending radius.
When a hydrate plug is to be removed from the pipeline, the pig is sluiced into the pipeline in a manner per se. Via a stuffing box, the umbilical is pulled into the pipeline from an umbilical reel.
The pig is pumped into the pipeline while the fluid that is located between the hydrate plug and the pig, is drained via the umbilical conduit into a collection tank placed on the vessel.
After the pig is displaced onto the hydrate plug, a fluid arranged with hydrate-plug-dissolving properties, for example a warm fluid and/or chemicals, is circulated down through one umbilical conduit while fluid flows back through at least one other umbilical conduit until the hydrate plug is removed. While this process is ongoing, the tool simultaneously may move forward as the hydrate plug is dissolved. The pig may then be pumped back, for example by pumping fluid in through the umbilical, or it may be pulled out of the pipeline, for example by means of the tractor feeder and/or the umbilical reel.
When displacing the pig out of the pipeline, it may be advantageous to supply chemicals, for example methanol or glycol, to prevent new hydrate plugs from forming, or possibly gas to gradually reduce the static pressure of the liquid column as the plug returns to surface.
The method makes possible to dissolve hydrate plugs in pressurized pipelines. The pressure in the pipeline may be controlled and adjusted in a manner allowing the pressure-temperature relation to be maintained in a mutual relation that reduces the risk of hydrate plug formation. A potential liquid column located within the riser from the seabed onto the vessel may be removed when displacing the hydrate plug out of the pipeline.
In the following a non-restrictive example of a preferred method and device is described, these being illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the drawings, reference numeral 1 denotes a pig connected to an umbilical 2. The umbilical 2 is provided with three conduits 4′, 4″ and 4′″, a number of cables 6 and a reinforced mantle 8, cf.
While sealing against the exterior, the umbilical 2 extends through the relatively flexible body 10 of the pig 1 and terminates at the front-end portion 12 of the pig 1, cf.
The umbilical 2 extends through a stuffing box 18 onto a umbilical reel 22, where the conduits 4′, 4″, 4′″ of the umbilical 2 may be connected to a chemical tank 24 and/or a collection tank 26 via pipes 28 and 30, respectively, and via valves and pumps (not shown) in a manner per se.
Fluid for displacing the pig 1 into the pipeline 16 is pumped into the pipeline 16 from a tank 32 via a pump 34 and a valve 36.
When a hydrate plug 38 is to be removed, the pig 1 is sluiced in a manner per se into the pipeline 16 while the umbilical is placed in the stuffing box 18. Fluid from the tank 32 is pumped, via the pump 34 and the valve 36, into the pipeline 16 where the fluid drives the pig 1 inwards in the pipeline 16, while the fluid located in the pipeline 16 between the pig 1 and the hydrate plug 38 is drained into the collection tank 26 via one or several conduits 4′, 4″, 4′″ of the umbilical 2 and the pipe 30, cf.
When the pig. 1 is displaced onwards to the region of the hydrate plug 38, cf.
Via the umbilical 2, the umbilical reel 22 may be used to pull the pig 1 out of the pipeline 16. The pig 1 may also be pumped out by pumping fluid, or chemicals, in through the conduits 4′, 4″, 4′″.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20022166 | May 2002 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO03/00147 | 5/6/2003 | WO | 00 | 1/3/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/095792 | 11/20/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3020958 | Kenneday | Feb 1962 | A |
3346045 | Knapp et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3525401 | Childers et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
4027730 | Sparlin | Jun 1977 | A |
4124039 | St. Laurent | Nov 1978 | A |
4909325 | Hopmann | Mar 1990 | A |
4986311 | Mikkelson | Jan 1991 | A |
5209304 | Nice | May 1993 | A |
5402850 | Lalande et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
6315498 | Baugh et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343652 | Corre et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374838 | Baugh | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6651744 | Crawford | Nov 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
671 422 | Aug 1989 | CH |
0 457 375 | Nov 1991 | EP |
180783 | Jun 1997 | NO |
WO 9927223 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0134940 | May 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050217855 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |