This application is the US national stage of International Application No. PCT/SE2010/000210 filed on 26 Aug. 2010, which claims the benefit of Swedish Patent Application Serial No. 0901128-9, filed on 27 Aug. 2009, both of which are incorporated herein in their entireties.
The present invention refers to relubrication of a number of bearings, particularly for grease lubricated bearings relubricated by an automated lubrication system.
Greases used for lubricating bearings often have a shorter service life than the expected service life for the bearings lubricated thereby. For that reason rolling bearings have to be relubricated, and relubrication shall take place at a time when the condition of the lubricant is still satisfactory.
The requirement for relubrication depends on many related factors, including bearing type and size, speed at which the bearings are running, operating temperature, type of grease, bearing environment, etcetera.
The common method for deciding the relubrication intervals t.sub.f for bearings is by using statistical rules, where for instance the SKF recommended relubrication intervals are defined as the time period, at the end of which 99% of the bearings are still reliably lubricated.
Diagrams have been created which are used for establishing the relubrication interval for a specific bearing, at a speed factor “A” multiplied by the relevant bearing factor “bf”, where the graphs represent the load ratio C/P. Such a relubrication interval chart can be seen in the accompanying
With this earlier and commonly used method, it is possible to decide before the operation of the bearing assembly or bearing assemblies shall be relubricated, and the method has proven itself to give a fairly satisfactory and reliable result.
However, some of the factors to be considered may change gradually during operation for the bearing assembly or bearing assemblies relubricated by the automated lubrication system.
Thus it is possible that the load acting on a bearing can change, the temperature, at which the bearing is operating, can vary for external reasons and the rotational speed can be altered. The previous method of setting the t.sub.f value described above, thus will only give a surely satisfactory result under the prerequisite, that all parameters or factors used at the original setting of the relubrication interval are maintained unchanged.
The purpose of the present invention is to propose a new efficient method and a new improved system for establishing correct relubrication intervals and executing correct relubrication for a number of bearings preferably relubricated by an automatic lubrication system, whereby changes are automatically effected at variations in such factors as load, temperature and rotational speed.
A first exemplary embodiment presents a method for establishing and executing correct automatic relubrication for a number of bearings incorporated in a grease lubrication system, wherein initial values for the relubrication interval t.sub.f and/or lubricant volume are calculated and established according to empirical methods,
data regarding bearing load, bearing temperature and bearing rotational speed are collected from the number of bearing assemblies during operation,
using the data for calculating a value for current lubrication interval t.sub.f,
comparing the initial value with the current value, and calculating a correct lubricant volume associated with a current relubrication interval t.sub.f independent of, if the current relubrication interval t.sub.f is equal to that initially established or not, supplying calculated current relubrication interval t.sub.f and lubricant volume to an automatic lubricating apparatus, and starting to calculate new initial values after performance of a lubrication sequence and inputting new current measured data regarding bearing load, bearing temperature and bearing rotational speed in an event of non-performance of a lubrication sequence.
A second exemplary embodiment presents a system for establishing and executing correct automatic relubrication for a number of bearings incorporated in a grease lubrication system, the system comprising:
a central processor unit;
a number of sensors provided in connection to bearing assemblies and adapted to measure temperature, load and rotational speed for the bearing assemblies;
a communication interface for transferring the values measured by the sensors to the central processing unit, wherein the values measured by the sensors includes bearing load, bearing temperature and bearing rotational speed are collected from the bearing assemblies during operation; and
an instruction set providing operational directions to the central processor unit, the instruction set including an instruction step of utilizing the data for calculating a value for current lubrication interval t.sub.f, and
an instruction step of comparing the initial value with the current value, and calculating a correct lubricant volume associated with a current relubrication interval t.sub.f; and
an automatic lubrication apparatus in communication with the central processing unit, the automatic lubrication apparatus arranged to feed out the correct lubricant volume to the bearing assemblies in accordance with the calculated correct relubrication interval t.sub.f calculated by the central processing unit in accordance with the instruction set based upon the current values measured by the sensors.
The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings which show a non-limiting example of embodiment thereof and in which:
As described above, at the earlier common method of establishing appropriate relubrication intervals for grease lubrication, is used a relubrication interval chart of the type illustrated in
In the example illustrated in
In
In
Data measured by the sensors 2, 3 and 4 in
In box 11 a new interval t.sub.f is calculated and this new t.sub.f value is compared in box 12 with the initial t.sub.f value. If the new t.sub.f value differs from the initial t.sub.f value i.e. falling below the initial t.sub.f value, the new t.sub.f value is introduced after calculation in box 13 as a new current t.sub.f value. This new current t.sub.f value then is supplied to box 14, where a correct amount of lubricant is calculated for the current t.sub.f value.
In the event that the calculated t.sub.f value is not smaller than the initial or current t.sub.f value, the initial or current t.sub.f value is supplied directly to the box 14.
The current relubrication interval t.sub.f and the amount of lubricant required is output from box 15 to a comparison box in 16 where the current time is compared to the value of the interval t.sub.f received from box 15.
If the actual time and the preset relubrication interval time coincide, information is outputted to the box 17, from which is delivered a lubrication impulse to the automatic lubrication apparatus 6 shown in
If there is a difference between the actual time and the calculated relubrication interval t.sub.f>the comparison box emits a signal to box 10 for inputting load, temperature and speed values representing the instantaneous conditions, delivered by the box 9. After such a signal has been sent out and the current data has been inputted, the sequence is repeated via the boxes 11-16. The sequence includes the steps of collecting data, using the current data, and comparing the current anticipated value until the automatic lubrication apparatus provides lubricant to the bearing.
The input data required can be read continuously or intermittently and the signals emitted by the box 15 are preferably delivered to an electromagnetic valve of any appropriate type.
After start of the system in this case there is made a calculation of initial values in box 18, whereupon load, speed and temperature variables are inputted in 19, together with details of current running condition, which are introduced from box 20.
In box 21, runtime calculations are performed to establish a new t.sub.f value, and in box 22 this new t.sub.f value is compared to actual t.sub.f value. If the result of this calculation is that the new value is smaller than the actual, then the new t.sub.f value is entered in box 23 as current actual t.sub.f value, and if not the “old” actual t.sub.f value is inserted in box 24, where the grease amount required is calculated and set. In the event the comparison in box 22 results in a “Yes”, the new actual t.sub.f value as obtained in box 23 is used for the grease amount calculation in box 24. The current values from box 24 are displayed in box 25, and in box 26 it is considered if it is time to relubricate or not. If the comparison results in a “No”, a new calculating process is initiated in box 19. If the comparison in box 26 results in a “Yes” in box 27 it is established if the last set grease amount is bigger than the minimum amount that the system can deliver in a relubrication cycle. In such case the relubrication is performed at 28 and the amount is returned to box 29 in which it is established whether the maximum grease amount is reached or not. If this comparison is positive in box 30 is displayed message regarding removing grease and requiring reset, whereas at a negative result, i.e. if the maximum grease amount has not been reached. The sequence is again returned to box 19 for start of a new relubrication cycle. If the result of the comparison in box 27 is negative, i.e. the last set lubricant amount is not bigger than the minimum amount the system can deliver, it is first established in box 31 if the maximum cycles of withhold lubrication has been reached. If the result from this comparison is “Yes” at 32 a relubrication is forced and the amount is returned to box 29. In case of a “No” at this location in box 33 is initiated that the relubrication should not be executed and the number of hold the relubrication cycles is incremented. The sequence thereupon is continued in box 29.
In this embodiment thus the system will check if the last set amount of grease is larger than the minimum amount the system can deliver in a relubrication cycle. If the last set amount is greater than the minimum amount, the system will trigger a relubrication sequence and add the amount of grease to a “grease amount variable” (box 29).
If the last set amount of grease is lower than the minimum amount, the system will hold the lubrication cycle for the next time, but this can only be effected for a preset number of times.
If the maximum number of hold cycles is reached, the system will act for enforcing a relubrication and add the amount to the “grease amount variable”.
Before returning to the main loop, the system will check the total amount of lubricant, which has been supplied to the bearing, “grease amount variable” against a “maximum grease amount variable”.
When the maximum amount has been reached, the system will enter a never ending loop, telling the operator to stop, clean and reset.
With methods and systems as described hereinabove, the problem associated with incorrect input data regarding load, temperature and rotational speed at determination of lubrication interval is eliminated.
The method and system further makes it possible to apply a dynamically adjustable lubrication interval and/or an adjustable lubricant quantity during operation of the bearing assemblies associated with the system.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0901128 | Aug 2009 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2010/000210 | 8/26/2010 | WO | 00 | 5/11/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/025430 | 3/3/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4738336 | Smith et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
5060760 | Long et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5526783 | Ito et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5671825 | Wong et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5813496 | Hyvonen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5952803 | Canada et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969601 | Sato et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6161962 | French et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179597 | Ito et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196057 | Discenzo | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6253601 | Wang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286363 | Discenzo | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6324899 | Discenzo | Dec 2001 | B1 |
7017712 | Rake et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7018106 | Okada | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7140468 | Rake et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7665577 | Javelly et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20030015374 | Matsuura et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030110860 | Okada | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115977 | Holweg et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040197040 | Walker | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070030162 | Okada et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1277977 | Jan 2003 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120221153 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |