Method and additive for controlling nitrogen oxide emissions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11384304
  • Patent Number
    11,384,304
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 30, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 12, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
The present disclosure is directed to an additive mixture and method for controlling nitrogen oxide(s) by adding the additive mixture to a feed material prior to combustion.
Description
FIELD

The disclosure relates generally to contaminant removal from gas streams and particularly to contaminant removal from combustion off-gas streams.


BACKGROUND

Coal is an abundant source of energy. While coal is abundant, the burning of coal results in significant pollutants being released into the air. In fact, the burning of coal is a leading cause of smog, acid rain, global warning, and toxins in the air (Union of Concerned Scientists). In an average year, a single, typical coal plant generates 3.7 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2), 10,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2), 10,200 tons of nitric oxide (NOx), 720 tons of carbon monoxide (CO), 220 tons of volatile organic compounds, 225 pounds of arsenic and many other toxic metals, including mercury.


Emissions of NOx include nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Free radicals of nitrogen (N2) and oxygen (O2) combine chemically primarily to form NO at high combustion temperatures. This thermal NOx tends to form even when nitrogen is removed from the fuel. When discharged to the air, emissions of NO oxidize to form NO2, which tends to accumulate excessively in many urban atmospheres. In sunlight, the NO2 reacts with volatile organic compounds to form ground level ozone, eye irritants and photochemical smog.


Exhaust-after-treatment techniques can reduce significantly NOx emissions levels using various chemical or catalytic methods. Such methods are known in the art and involve selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or selective noncatalytic reduction (SNCR). Such after-treatment methods typically require some type of molecular oxygen reductant, such as ammonia, urea (CH4N2O), or other nitrogenous agent, for removal of NOx emissions.


SCR uses a solid catalyst surface to convert NOx to N2. These solid catalysts are selective for NOx removal and do not reduce emissions of CO and unburned hydrocarbons. Large catalyst volumes are normally needed to maintain low levels of NOx and inhibit NH3 breakthrough. The catalyst activity depends on temperature and declines with use. Normal variations in catalyst activity are accommodated only by enlarging the volume of catalyst or limiting the range of combustion operation. Catalysts may require replacement prematurely due to sintering or poisoning when exposed to high levels of temperature or exhaust contaminants. Even under normal operating conditions, the SCR method requires a uniform distribution of NH3 relative to NOx in the exhaust gas. NOx emissions, however, are frequently distributed non-uniformly, so low levels of both NOx and NH3 breakthrough may be achieved only by controlling the distribution of injected NH3 or mixing the exhaust to a uniform NOx level.


SCR catalysts can have other catalytic effects that can undesirably alter flue gas chemistry for mercury capture. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) can be catalytically oxidized to sulfur trioxide, SO3, which is undesirable because it can cause problems with the operation of the boiler or the operation of air pollution control technologies, including the following: interferes with mercury capture on fly ash or with activated carbon sorbents downstream of the SCR; reacts with excess ammonia in the air preheater to form solid deposits that interfere with flue gas flow; and forms an ultrafine sulfuric acid aerosol, which is emitted out the stack.


SCR is performed typically between the boiler and air (pre) heater and, though effective in removing nitrogen oxides, represents a major retrofit for coal-fired power plants. SCR commonly requires a large catalytic surface and capital expenditure for ductwork, catalyst housing, and controls. Expensive catalysts must be periodically replaced, adding to ongoing operational costs.


Although SCR is capable of meeting regulatory NOx reduction limits, additional NOx removal prior to the SCR is desirable to reduce the amount of reagent ammonia introduced within the SCR, extend catalyst life and potentially reduce the catalyst surface area and activity required to achieve the final NOx control level. For systems without SCR installed, a NOx trim technology, such as SNCR, combined with retrofit combustion controls, such as low NOx burners and staged combustion, can be combined to achieve regulatory compliance.


SNCR is a retrofit NOx control technology in which ammonia or urea is injected post-combustion in a narrow temperature range of the flue path. SNCR can optimally remove up to 20 to 40% of NOx. It is normally applied as a NOx trim method, often in combination with other NOx control methods. It can be difficult to optimize for all combustion conditions and plant load. The success of SNCR for any plant is highly dependent on the degree of mixing and distribution that is possible in a limited temperature zone. Additionally, there can be maintenance problems with SNCR systems due to injection lance pluggage and failure.


Recent tax legislation provided incentives for reducing NOx emissions by treating the combustion fuel, rather than addressing the emissions through combustion modification or SNCR or SCR type technologies downstream. To qualify for the incentive, any additive must be added before the point of combustion. The goal does not provide a straight forward solution, as the traditional reagents used to treat NOx do not survive at combustion temperatures. Therefore, a compound is required that can be mixed with the combustion fuel, move through the combustion zone, and arrive in the post-combustion zone in sufficient quantity to measurably reduce NOx.


SUMMARY

These and other needs are addressed by the various aspects, embodiments, and configurations of the present disclosure. The disclosure is directed to contaminant removal by adding an additive mixture to a feed material.


The disclosure can be directed to a method for reducing NOx emissions in a pulverized coal boiler system including the steps:


(a) contacting a feed material with an additive mixture comprising an additive and a thermal stability agent to form an additive-containing feed material; and


(b) combusting the additive-containing feed material to produce a contaminated gas stream including a contaminant produced by combustion of the feed material and the additive or a derivative thereof, the additive or a derivative thereof removing or causing removal of the contaminant.


The additive, in the absence of the thermal stability agent, is unstable when the feed material is combusted. In the presence of the thermal stability agent, a greater amount of the additive survives feed material combustion than in the absence of the thermal stability agent. Typically, up to about 75%, more typically up to about 60%, and even more typically up to about 50% of the additive survives feed material combustion in the presence of the thermal stability agent. Comparatively, in the absence of the thermal stability agent less than 10% of the additive commonly survives feed material combustion. For certain additives, namely urea, the additive, in the absence of the thermal stability agent, can contribute to NOx formation.


The additive can be any composition or material that is able to remove or cause removal of a targeted contaminant. For example, the additive can be a nitrogenous material targeting removal of an acid gas, such as a nitrogen oxide. Under the conditions of the contaminated gas stream, the nitrogenous material or a derivative thereof removes or causes removal of the nitrogen oxide. The nitrogenous material can include one or more of ammonia, an amine, an amide, cyanuric acid, nitride, and urea.


The additive can include multiple additives, each targeting a different contaminant. For example, the additive can include a haloamine, halamide, or other organohalide. The halogen or halide targets mercury removal while the amine or amide targets nitrogen oxide removal.


The nitrogenous material can be added to the feed material before combustion. An exemplary additive-containing feed material includes the nitrogenous material, coal, and the thermal stability agent.


The thermal stability agent can be any material that can inhibit or retard degradation or decomposition of the additive during combustion of the feed material. One type of thermal stability agent endothermically reacts with other gas stream components. Examples include a metal hydroxide, metal carbonate, metal bicarbonate, metal hydrate, and metal nitride. Another type of thermal stability agent provides a porous matrix to protect the additive from the adverse effects of feed material combustion. Exemplary thermal stability agents include zeolite, char, graphite, ash (e.g., fly ash or bottom ash) and metal oxide. Another type of thermal stability agent provides a protective coating around a portion of the additive. Exemplary thermal stability agents include a silane, siloxane, organosilane, amorphous silica, and clay.


The additive mixture can be in the form of a compound containing both the additive and thermal stability agent. Examples include a metal cyanamide and metal nitride.


The additive mixture can include other components, such as a binder to bind the additive to the thermal stability agent, a stabilizing agent, and/or dispersant. The binder can be selected to decompose during combustion of the additive-containing feed material to release the additive or a derivative thereof into the contaminated gas stream.


One additive mixture formulation is in the form of prills comprising urea and an alkaline earth metal hydroxide.


The present disclosure can provide a number of advantages depending on the particular configuration. The process of the present disclosure can broaden the operating envelope of and improve the NOx reduction performance of the SNCR while eliminating problems of reagent distribution, injection lance fouling and maintenance. It can also have a wider tolerance for process temperature variation than post-combustion SNCR since the nitrogenous reagent is introduced pre-combustion. The additive mixture can comply with NOx reduction targets set by tax legislation providing incentives for NOx reduction. The additive mixture can provide the additive with adequate protection from the heat of the combustion zone, reduce mass transfer of oxygen and combustion radicals which would break down the additive, and deliver sufficient quantities of additive to the post-flame zone to measurably reduce NOx emissions. The process can use existing boiler conditions to facilitate distribution and encourage appropriate reaction kinetics. It can use existing coal feed equipment as the motive equipment for introduction of the additives to the boiler. Only minor process-specific equipment may be required. The process can decrease the amount of pollutants produced from a fuel, while increasing the value of such fuel. Because the additive can facilitate the removal of multiple contaminants, the additive can be highly versatile and cost effective. The additive can use nitrogenous compositions readily available in certain areas, for example, the use of animal waste and the like. Accordingly, the cost for the compositions can be low and easily be absorbed by the user.


These and other advantages will be apparent from the disclosure of the aspects, embodiments, and configurations contained herein.


The phrases “at least one”, “one or more”, and “and/or” are open-ended expressions that are both conjunctive and disjunctive in operation. For example, each of the expressions “at least one of A, B and C”, “at least one of A, B, or C”, “one or more of A, B, and C”, “one or more of A, B, or C” and “A, B, and/or C” means A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A, B and C together. When each one of A, B, and C in the above expressions refers to an element, such as X, Y, and Z, or class of elements, such as X1-Xn, Y1-Ym, and Z1-Z0, the phrase is intended to refer to a single element selected from X, Y, and Z, a combination of elements selected from the same class (e.g., X1 and X2) as well as a combination of elements selected from two or more classes (e.g., Y1 and Zo).


“A” or “an” entity refers to one or more of that entity. As such, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. It is also to be noted that the terms “comprising”, “including”, and “having” can be used interchangeably.


“Absorption” and cognates thereof refer to the incorporation of a substance in one state into another of a different state (e.g. liquids being absorbed by a solid or gases being absorbed by a liquid). Absorption is a physical or chemical phenomenon or a process in which atoms, molecules, or ions enter some bulk phase—gas, liquid or solid material. This is a different process from adsorption, since molecules undergoing absorption are taken up by the volume, not by the surface (as in the case for adsorption).


“Adsorption” and cognates thereof refer to the adhesion of atoms, ions, biomolecules, or molecules of gas, liquid, or dissolved solids to a surface. This process creates a film of the adsorbate (the molecules or atoms being accumulated) on the surface of the adsorbent. It differs from absorption, in which a fluid permeates or is dissolved by a liquid or solid. Similar to surface tension, adsorption is generally a consequence of surface energy. The exact nature of the bonding depends on the details of the species involved, but the adsorption process is generally classified as physisorption (characteristic of weak van der Waals forces)) or chemisorption (characteristic of covalent bonding). It may also occur due to electrostatic attraction.


“Amide” refers to compounds with the functional group RnE(O)xNR′2 (R and R′ refer to H or organic groups). Most common are “organic amides” (n=1, E=C, x=1), but many other important types of amides are known including phosphor amides (n=2, E=P, x=1 and many related formulas) and sulfonamides (E=S, x=2). The term amide can refer both to classes of compounds and to the functional group (RnE(O)xNR′2) within those compounds.


“Amines” are organic compounds and functional groups that contain a basic nitrogen atom with a lone pair. Amines are derivatives of ammonia, wherein one or more hydrogen atoms have been replaced by a substituent such as an alkyl or aryl group.


“Ash” refers to the residue remaining after complete combustion of the coal particles. Ash typically includes mineral matter (silica, alumina, iron oxide, etc.).


“Biomass” refers to biological matter from living or recently living organisms. Examples of biomass include, without limitation, wood, waste, (hydrogen) gas, seaweed, algae, and alcohol fuels. Biomass can be plant matter grown to generate electricity or heat. Biomass also includes, without limitation, plant or animal matter used for production of fibers or chemicals. Biomass further includes, without limitation, biodegradable wastes that can be burnt as fuel but generally excludes organic materials, such as fossil fuels, which have been transformed by geologic processes into substances such as coal or petroleum. Industrial biomass can be grown from numerous types of plants, including miscanthus, switchgrass, hemp, corn, poplar, willow, sorghum, sugarcane, and a variety of tree species, ranging from eucalyptus to oil palm (or palm oil).


“Circulating Fluidized Bed” or “CFB” refers to a combustion system for solid fuel (including coal or biomass). In fluidized bed combustion, solid fuels are suspended in a dense bed using upward-blowing jets of air. Combustion takes place in or immediately above the bed of suspended fuel particles. Large particles remain in the bed due to the balance between gravity and the upward convection of gas. Small particles are carried out of the bed. In a circulating fluidized bed, some particles of an intermediate size range are separated from the gases exiting the bed by means of a cyclone or other mechanical collector. These collected solids are returned to the bed. Limestone and/or sand are commonly added to the bed to provide a medium for heat and mass transfer. Limestone also reacts with SO2 formed from combustion of the fuel to form CaSO4.


“Coal” refers to a combustible material formed from prehistoric plant life. Coal includes, without limitation, peat, lignite, sub-bituminous coal, bituminous coal, steam coal, anthracite, and graphite. Chemically, coal is a macromolecular network comprised of groups of polynuclear aromatic rings, to which are attached subordinate rings connected by oxygen, sulfur, and aliphatic bridges.


“Halogen” refers to an electronegative element of group VIIA of the periodic table (e.g., fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, astatine, listed in order of their activity with fluorine being the most active of all chemical elements).


“Halide” refers to a chemical compound of a halogen with a more electropositive element or group.


“High alkali coals” refer to coals having a total alkali (e.g., calcium) content of at least about 20 wt. % (dry basis of the ash), typically expressed as CaO, while “low alkali coals” refer to coals having a total alkali content of less than 20 wt. % and more typically less than about 15 wt. % alkali (dry basis of the ash), typically expressed as CaO.


“High iron coals” refer to coals having a total iron content of at least about 10 wt. % (dry basis of the ash), typically expressed as Fe2O3, while “low iron coals” refer to coals having a total iron content of less than about 10 wt. % (dry basis of the ash), typically expressed as Fe2O3. As will be appreciated, iron and sulfur are typically present in coal in the form of ferrous or ferric carbonates and/or sulfides, such as iron pyrite.


“High sulfur coals” refer to coals having a total sulfur content of at least about 1.5 wt. % (dry basis of the coal) while “medium sulfur coals” refer to coals having between about 1.5 and 3 wt. % (dry basis of the coal) and “low sulfur coals” refer to coals having a total sulfur content of less than about 1.5 wt. % (dry basis of the coal).


“Means” as used herein shall be given its broadest possible interpretation in accordance with 35 U.S.C., Section 112, Paragraph 6. Accordingly, a claim incorporating the term “means” shall cover all structures, materials, or acts set forth herein, and all of the equivalents thereof. Further, the structures, materials or acts and the equivalents thereof shall include all those described in the summary of the invention, brief description of the drawings, detailed description, abstract, and claims themselves.


“Micrograms per cubic meter” or “μg/m3” refers to a means for quantifying the concentration of a substance in a gas and is the mass of the substance measured in micrograms found in a cubic meter of the gas.


“Neutron Activation Analysis” or “NAA” refers to a method for determining the elemental content of samples by irradiating the sample with neutrons, which create radioactive forms of the elements in the sample. Quantitative determination is achieved by observing the gamma rays emitted from these isotopes.


“Nitrogen oxide” and cognates thereof refer to one or more of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Nitric oxide is commonly formed at higher temperatures and becomes nitrogen dioxide at lower temperatures.


The term “normalized stoichiometric ratio” or “NSR”, when used in the context of NOx control, refers to the ratio of the moles of nitrogen contained in a compound that is injected into the combustion gas for the purpose of reducing NOx emissions to the moles of NOx in the combustion gas in the uncontrolled state.


“Particulate” and cognates thereof refer to fine particles, such as fly ash, unburned carbon, contaminate-carrying powdered activated carbon, soot, byproducts of contaminant removal, excess solid additives, and other fine process solids, typically entrained in a mercury-containing gas stream.


Pulverized coal (“PC”) boiler refers to a coal combustion system in which fine coal, typically with a median diameter of 100 microns or less, is mixed with air and blown into a combustion chamber. Additional air is added to the combustion chamber such that there is an excess of oxygen after the combustion process has been completed.


The phrase “ppmw X” refers to the parts-per-million, based on weight, of X alone. It does not include other substances bonded to X.


“Separating” and cognates thereof refer to setting apart, keeping apart, sorting, removing from a mixture or combination, or isolating. In the context of gas mixtures, separating can be done by many techniques, including electrostatic precipitators, baghouses, scrubbers, and heat exchange surfaces.


A “sorbent” is a material that sorbs another substance; that is, the material has the capacity or tendency to take it up by sorption.


“Sorb” and cognates thereof mean to take up a liquid or a gas by sorption.


“Sorption” and cognates thereof refer to adsorption and absorption, while desorption is the reverse of adsorption.


“Urea” or “carbamide” is an organic compound with the chemical formula CO(NH2)2. The molecule has two —NH2 groups joined by a carbonyl (C═O) functional group.


Unless otherwise noted, all component or composition levels are in reference to the active portion of that component or composition and are exclusive of impurities, for example, residual solvents or by-products, which may be present in commercially available sources of such components or compositions.


All percentages and ratios are calculated by total composition weight, unless indicated otherwise.


It should be understood that every maximum numerical limitation given throughout this disclosure is deemed to include each and every lower numerical limitation as an alternative, as if such lower numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every minimum numerical limitation given throughout this disclosure is deemed to include each and every higher numerical limitation as an alternative, as if such higher numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every numerical range given throughout this disclosure is deemed to include each and every narrower numerical range that falls within such broader numerical range, as if such narrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein. By way of example, the phrase from about 2 to about 4 includes the whole number and/or integer ranges from about 2 to about 3, from about 3 to about 4 and each possible range based on real (e.g., irrational and/or rational) numbers, such as from about 2.1 to about 4.9, from about 2.1 to about 3.4, and so on.


The preceding is a simplified summary of the disclosure to provide an understanding of some aspects of the disclosure. This summary is neither an extensive nor exhaustive overview of the disclosure and its various aspects, embodiments, and configurations. It is intended neither to identify key or critical elements of the disclosure nor to delineate the scope of the disclosure but to present selected concepts of the disclosure in a simplified form as an introduction to the more detailed description presented below. As will be appreciated, other aspects, embodiments, and configurations of the disclosure are possible utilizing, alone or in combination, one or more of the features set forth above or described in detail below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are incorporated into and form a part of the specification to illustrate several examples of the present disclosure. These drawings, together with the description, explain the principles of the disclosure. The drawings simply illustrate preferred and alternative examples of how the disclosure can be made and used and are not to be construed as limiting the disclosure to only the illustrated and described examples. Further features and advantages will become apparent from the following, more detailed, description of the various aspects, embodiments, and configurations of the disclosure, as illustrated by the drawings referenced below.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram according to an embodiment showing a common power plant configuration; and



FIG. 2 is a thermal stability agent formulation according to an embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Overview

The current disclosure is directed to an additive thermal stability agent to inhibit thermal degradation of an additive for controlling contaminant emissions from contaminant evolving facilities, such as smelters, autoclaves, roasters, steel foundries, steel mills, cement kilns, power plants, waste incinerators, boilers, and other contaminated gas stream producing industrial facilities. Although any contaminant may be targeted by the additive introduction system, typical contaminants include acid gases (e.g., sulfur-containing compounds (such as sulfur dioxide and trioxide produced by thermal oxidation of sulfides), nitrogen oxides (such as nitrogen monoxide and dioxide), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and hydrofluoric acid (HF)), mercury (elemental and/or oxidized forms), carbon oxides (such as carbon monoxide and dioxide), halogens and halides, and the like. Although the contaminant is typically evolved by combustion, it may be evolved by other oxidizing reactions, reducing reactions, and other thermal processes such as roasting, pyrolysis, and autoclaving, that expose contaminated materials to elevated temperatures.



FIG. 1 depicts a contaminated gas stream treatment process 100 for an industrial facility according to an embodiment. Referring to FIG. 1, a feed material 104 is provided. In one application, the feed material 104 is combustible and can be any synthetic or natural, contaminate-containing, combustible, and carbon-containing material, including coal, petroleum coke, and biomass. The feed material 104 can be a high alkali, high iron, and/or high sulfur coal. In other applications, the present disclosure is applicable to noncombustible, contaminant-containing feed materials, including, without limitation, metal-containing ores, concentrates, and tailings.


The feed material 104 is combined with an additive 106 and thermal stability agent 110 to form an additive-containing feed material 108. The additive 106 and thermal stability agent 110 may be contacted with the feed material 104 concurrently or at different times. They may be contacted with one another and subsequently contacted with the feed material 104.


The additive-containing feed material 108 is heated in thermal unit 112 to produce a contaminated gas stream 116. The thermal unit 112 can be any heating device, including, without limitation, a dry or wet bottom furnace (e.g., a blast furnace, puddling furnace, reverberatory furnace, Bessemer converter, open hearth furnace, basic oxygen furnace, cyclone furnace, stoker boiler, cupola furnace, a fluidized bed furnace (e.g., a CFB), arch furnace, and other types of furnaces), boiler, incinerator (e.g., moving grate, fixed grate, rotary-kiln, or fluidized or fixed bed, incinerators), calciners including multi-hearth, suspension or fluidized bed roasters, intermittent or continuous kiln (e.g., ceramic kiln, intermittent or continuous wood-drying kiln, anagama kiln, bottle kiln, rotary kiln, catenary arch kiln, Feller kiln, noborigama kiln, or top hat kiln), or oven.


The contaminated gas stream 116 generally includes a number of contaminants. A common contaminated gas stream 108 includes (elemental and ionic) mercury, particulates (such as fly ash), sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, hydrochloric acid (HCl), other acid gases, carbon oxides, and unburned carbon.


The contaminated gas stream 116 is optionally passed through the air preheater 120 to transfer some of the thermal energy of the contaminated gas stream 116 to air 122 prior to input to the thermal unit 112. The heat transfer produces a common temperature drop in the contaminated gas stream 116 of from about 500° C. to about 300° C. to produce a cooled contaminated gas stream 124 temperature commonly ranging from about 100 to about 400° C.


The cooled contaminated gas stream 124 passes through a particulate control device 128 to remove most of the particulates (and targeted contaminant and/or derivatives thereof) from the cooled contaminated gas stream 124 and form a treated gas stream 132. The particulate control device 500 can be any suitable device, including a wet or dry electrostatic precipitator, particulate filter such as a baghouse, wet particulate scrubber, and other types of particulate removal device.


The treated gas stream 132 is emitted, via gas discharge (e.g., stack), into the environment.


The Additive

The additive depends on the particular targeted contaminant. Exemplary additives include halogens, halides, nitrogenous materials, activated carbon, lime, soda ash, and the like. While a variety of additives may be employed to remove or cause removal of a targeted contaminant, the additive typically causes removal of nitrogen oxides and other acid gases. A typical additive for removing or causing removal of nitrogen oxide is a nitrogenous material, commonly ammonia, an ammonia precursor (such as an amine (e.g., a melamine (C3H3N6)), amide (e.g., a cyanamide (CN2H2)), and/or urea.


While not wishing to be bound by any theory, ammonia is believed to react with nitrogen oxides formed during the combustion of the feed material to yield gaseous nitrogen and water vapor according to the following global reaction:

2NO+2NH3+½O2custom character2N2+3H2O  (1)


The optimal temperature range for Reaction (1) is from about 1550° F. to 2000° F. (843 to 1093° C.). Above 2000° F. (1093° C.), the nitrogeneous compounds from the ammonia precursor may be oxidized to form NOx. Below 1550° F. (843° C.), the production of free radicals of ammonia and amines may be too slow for the global reaction to go to completion.


Without being bound by theory, an amine and/or amide can act as an ammonia precursor that, under the conditions in a thermal unit 112, thermally decomposes and/or undergoes a hydrolysis reaction to form ammonia gas, or possibly free radicals of ammonia (NH3) and amines (NH2) (herein referred to collectively as “ammonia”).


Sources of amines or amides include any substance that, when heated, produces ammonia gas and/or free radicals of ammonia. Examples of such substances include, for example, urea, carbamide, polymeric methylene urea, animal waste, ammonia, methamine urea, cyanuric acid, and other compounds which can break down and form NH* or NH2* radicals, and combinations and mixtures thereof. In an embodiment, the substance is urea. In an embodiment, the substance is animal waste. In yet other embodiments, granular long chain polymerized methylene ureas are used as additives, as the kinetics of thermal decomposition are expected to be relatively slower and therefore a larger fraction of unreacted material may still be available past the flame zone. The additive may further be any compound with an amine (e.g., NH2) or amide functional group. Examples would include methyl amine, ethyl amine, butyl amine, etc.


The additive can contain a single substance for removing a targeted contaminant pollutant, or it can contain a mixture of such substances for targeting different contaminants, such as nitrogen oxides and elemental mercury. For example, the additive can contain a single substance including both an amine or amide for removing or causing removal of a nitrogen oxide and a halogen for removing or causing removal of elemental mercury. An example of such an additive is a haloamine formed by at least one halogen and at least one amine, a halamide formed by at least one halogen and at least one amide, or other organohalide including both an ammonia precursor and dissociable halogen. The precursor composition can contain a mixture of an amine and/or an amide, and a halogen.


In another embodiment, the additive will be added to the feed material along with a halogen component. Preferred methods for adding the halogen component are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,372,362 and US 2012-0100053 A1, and US 2012-0216729 A1, each of which is incorporated herein by this reference. The halogen component may be added as an elemental halogen or a halogen precursor. Commonly, the halogen component is added to the feed material before combustion. The halogen may be added in slurry form or as a solid, including a halogen salt. In either form, the halogen may be added at the same time as, or separate from, the additive.


This list is non-exhaustive; the primary concerns are the chemical properties of the additive. A benefit of the amine and amide materials may be a slower decomposition rate, thus allowing ammonia generation to occur further downstream in the flow of the contaminated gas stream 108 than would be the case with urea and thus exposing the ammonia to less oxidation to NO than is seen with urea when introduced with the feed material to the thermal unit 112.


Commonly at least about 25%, more commonly at least most, more commonly at least about 75%, more commonly at least about 85% and even more commonly at least about 95% of the additive is added in liquid or solid form to the combustion feed material.


The additive can be formulated to withstand more effectively, compared to other forms of the additive, the thermal effects of combustion. In one formulation, at least most of the additive is added to the combustion feed material as a liquid, which is able to absorb into the matrix of the feed material. The additive will volatilize while the bulk of the feed material consumes a large fraction thermal energy that could otherwise thermally degrade the additive. The liquid formulation can include other components, such as a solvent (e.g., water surfactants, buffering agents and the like)), and a binder to adhere or bind the additive to the feed material, such as a wax or wax derivative, gum or gum derivative, and other inorganic and organic binders designed to disintegrate thermally during combustion (before substantial degradation of the additive occurs), thereby releasing the additive into the boiler or furnace freeboard, or into the off-gas.


In another formulation, at least most of the additive is added to the combustion feed material as a particulate. In this formulation, the particle size distribution (P80 size) of the additive particles as added to the fuel commonly ranges from about 20 to about 6 mesh (Tyler), more commonly from about 14 to about 8 mesh (Tyler), and even more commonly from about 10 to about 8 mesh (Tyler).


The additive can be slurried or dissolved in the liquid formulation. A typical additive concentration in the liquid formulation ranges from about 20% to about 60%, more typically from about 35% to about 55%, and even more typically from about 45% to about 50%.


The Thermal Stability Agent

Despite the formulation of the additive to withstand the effects of combustion, the additive can still thermally degrade under the conditions in the thermal unit 112. When the additive-containing feed material is combusted for example, the additive can be thermally degraded, oxidized, or decomposed by the flame envelope. The thermal stability agent generally provides an encapsulation compound or heat sink that protects and delivers the additive through the flame envelope (and the intense chemical reactions occurring within the flame envelope), so that it survives in sufficient quantity to measurably affect contaminant (e.g., NOx) emissions. As will be appreciated, the flame envelope in the thermal unit 112 typically has a temperature in excess of 2,000° F. (1093° C.).


The thermal stability agent can be a metal or metal-containing compound, such as an alkaline earth metal or alkaline earth metal-containing compound, particularly a hydroxide or carbonate or bicarbonate. Commonly, the thermal stability agent is an alkaline earth metal-containing hydroxide or carbonate, such as magnesium hydroxide or magnesium carbonate. While not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that, in the combustion process, the metal hydroxide (e.g., magnesium hydroxide) or carbonate (e.g., magnesium carbonate) or metal bicarbonate calcines to a metal oxide (e.g., MgO) in an endothermic reaction. The reaction in effect creates a localized heat sink. Therefore, when mixed thoroughly with the additive (e.g., urea) the reaction product creates a heat shield, absorbing heat from the furnace flame zone or envelope in the localized area of the additive molecules. This can allow the additive to survive in sufficient quantity to target the selected contaminant (e.g., NOx) downstream of the thermal unit 112.


A common additive mixture comprises the additive, namely urea, and the thermal stability agent, namely magnesium hydroxide or carbonate. The primary active components of the additive mixture are urea and magnesium hydroxide or carbonate.


The additive mixture may not only comprise the additive and the thermal stability agent as separate components but also comprise the additive and thermal stability agent as part of a common chemical compound. For example, the mixture may comprise a metal cyanamide (e.g., an alkaline earth metal cyanamide such as calcium cyanamide (e.g., CaCN2)) and/or a metal nitride (e.g., an alkaline earth metal nitride such as calcium nitride (e.g., Ca3N2)). The metal cyanamide or nitride can, depending on temperature, produce not only ammonia but also a particulate metal oxide or carbonate. Metal cyanamide, in particular, can proceed through intermediate cyanamide via hydrolysis and then onto urea formation with further hydrolysis. It may therefore offer a substantial degree of delay in urea release for subsequent ammonia production in the contaminated gas stream 108, which can be a substantial benefit relative to the additive alone.


As will be appreciated, calcium and other alkaline earth materials can perform similarly to magnesium oxide. Furthermore, any metal hydrate or hydroxide mineral can also be suitable as this family of minerals can decompose endothermically to provide the necessary sacrificial heat shield to promote survival of the additive (particularly nitrogenous materials) out of the flame envelope.


Commonly, the molar ratio of the thermal stability agent:additive ranges from about 1:1 to about 10:1, more commonly from about 1:1 to about 8:1 and even more commonly from about 1.5:1 to about 5:1.


The additive mixture can be added to the feed material either as a solid or as a slurry. Commonly, the additive mixture is added to the feed material prior to combustion. Under normal operating conditions, the additive mixture will be applied on the feed belt shortly before combustion. However, the additive mixture may be mixed with the feed material, either all at once or with the individual components added at different times, at a remote location.


Another thermal stability agent formulation comprises a thermally stable substrate matrix, other than the feed material particles, to protect the additive through the flame combustion zone or envelope. Exemplary thermally stable substrates to support the nitrogenous component include zeolites (or other porous metal silicate materials), clays, activated carbon (e.g., powdered, granular, extruded, bead, impregnated, and/or polymer coated activated carbon), char, graphite, ash (e.g., (fly) ash and (bottom) ash), metals, metal oxides, and the like.


The thermal stability agent formulation can include other components, such as a solvent (e.g., water surfactants, buffering agents and the like)), and a binder to adhere or bind the additive to the substrate, such as a wax or wax derivative, gum or gum derivative, alkaline binding agents (e.g., alkali or alkaline earth metal hydroxides, carbonates, or bicarbonates, such as lime, limestone, caustic soda, and/or trona), and/or other inorganic and organic binders designed to disintegrate thermally during combustion (before substantial degradation of the additive occurs), thereby releasing the additive into the boiler or furnace freeboard, or into the off-gas.


A thermal stability agent formulation 200 is shown in FIG. 2. The formulation 200 includes thermal stability agent particles 204a-d bound to and substantially surrounding an additive particle 208. The formulation can include a binder 212 to adhere the various particles together with sufficient strength to withstand contact with the feed material 104 and subsequent handling and transporting to the thermal unit 112. As can be seen from FIG. 2, the thermal stability agent particles 204a-d can form a thermally protective wall, or a surface contact heat sink, around the additive particle 208 to absorb thermal energy sufficiently for the additive particle 208 to survive combustion conditions in the thermal unit 112. The thermal stability agent formulation 200 is typically formed, or premixed, prior to contact with the feed material 104.


A common thermal stability agent formulation to deliver sufficient NOx reducing additive to the post-flame zone for NOx and/or other contaminant removal incorporates the additive into a fly ash matrix combined with one or more alkaline binding agents, such as an alkali or alkaline earth metal hydroxide (e.g., lime, limestone, and sodium hydroxide) and alkali and alkaline earth metal carbonates and bicarbonates (e.g., trona (trisodium hydrogendicarbonate dihydrate or Na3(CO3)(HCO3).2H2O)). This formulation can provide the additive with adequate protection from the heat of the combustion zone, reduce mass transfer of oxygen and combustion radicals which would break down the additive, and deliver sufficient quantities of the additive reagent to the post-flame zone to measurably reduce NOx and/or other contaminant emissions.


Other granular urea additives with binder may also be employed.


The additive can be mixed with substrate (e.g., fly ash) and alkaline binder(s) to form a macroporous and/or microporous matrix in which the additive becomes an integral part of the substrate matrix to form the additive mixture. The composition of the additive mixture can be such that the additive acts as a binding agent for the substrate, and it is theorized that the substrate can protect the additive from the intense heat and reactions of the flame envelope. The matrix can act as a porous structure with many small critical orifices. The orifices effectively serve as a “molecular sieve,” limiting the rate at which the additive is able to escape from the matrix. The matrix acts as a heat shield, allowing for survival of the additive trapped within the matrix through the flame envelope. Properly designed, the porous matrix structure can ensure that sufficient additive arrives in the cooler flue gas zones in sufficient quantities to measurably reduce NOx and/or other contaminant levels.


Ash as an additive substrate can have advantages. Because the fly ash already went through a combustion cycle, it readily moves through the flame zone and the rest of the boiler/combustor/steam generating plant without adverse affects. Via the fly ash and alkaline stabilizer matrix, an additive can arrive in the fuel rich zone between the flame envelope and over-fire air where it is introduced, for example, to NOx molecules and can facilitate their reduction to N2. In addition, in units with short gas phase residence time, the additive is designed to survive through the entire combustion process including passing through the over-fire air, if in use at a particular generating station, to introduce the additive (e.g., nitrogen containing NOx reducing agent) into the upper furnace, which is the traditional SNCR injection location. If used in operations where staged combustion is not employed, the additive is designed to survive the combustion zone and reduce NOx in the upper furnace.


The relative amounts of additive, substrate and binder depend on the application. Typically, the additive mixture comprises from about 10 to about 90 wt. %, more typically from about 20 to about 80 wt. %, and even more typically from about 30 to about 70 wt. % additive (dry weight), from about 90 to about 10 wt. %, more typically from about 80 to about 20 wt. %, and even more typically from about 70 to about 30 wt. % substrate (dry weight), and from about 0 to about 5 wt. %, more typically from about 0.1 to about 3 wt. %, and even more typically from about 0.2 to about 2 wt. % binder (dry weight). As noted, the binder is optional; therefore, it can be omitted in other additive mixture formulations.


Various methods are also envisioned for generating an additive mixture of the additive and the thermal stability agent. In one example, the substrate (e.g., recycled ash) is mixed with a liquid additive. The additive mixture then may be added to the feed material as a slurry or sludge, or as a solid matrix with varying amounts of residual moisture. In yet another aspect, the additive mixture is created by applying a liquid additive (e.g., ammonia or urea) to the substrate (e.g., recycled fly ash). The liquid additive can be introduced by dripping onto the substrate. The substrate might be presented by recycling captured fly ash or by introducing in bulk in advance of the combustion source. After applying the additive, the additive mixture is pressed into a brick or wafer. A range of sizes and shapes can function well. The shape and size of an additive mixture particle added to the feed material can be designed based on thermal unit 112 design to optimize the delivery of the additive in the thermal unit based upon the fluid dynamics present in a particular application.


In another example, the feed material is first treated by adding the substrate with the additive. Once treated, the feed material is transported and handled in the same way as untreated feed material. In power plants for example, coal pretreated with the additive mixture may be stored in a bunker, fed through a pulverizer, and then fed to the burners for combustion. During combustion, a fuel-rich environment may be created to facilitate sufficient additive survival through the flame envelope so that the additive may be mixed with and react with NOx or other targeted contaminant either in the fuel-rich zone between the burners and over fire air or in the upper thermal unit 112 depending upon the gas phase residence times within the thermal unit 112. Alternatively, the additive-containing feed material may be burned in a fuel-lean combustion condition, with the substrate matrix providing enough mass transfer inhibition such that the additive is not consumed during the flame envelope.


The following combinations and ratios of chemicals have demonstrated a high degree of thermal stability. This list is not exhaustive but rather is simply illustrative of various combinations that have shown favorable characteristics.


Fly Ash/Urea, wherein Urea is added as about a 35-40% solution in water to the fly ash. No other water is added to the mixture. The evaluated combination included 1,500 g Powder River Basin “PRB” fly ash, approximately 400 grams urea, and 600 mL water.


Fly Ash/Urea with Ca/Na, comprising: 1,500 g PRB fly ash, approximately 400 grams urea from urea solution, 300 grams NaOH, and CaO at a 1:1 molar ratio and 15% of total using hydrated lime.


Fly Ash/Urea/methylene urea, comprising: 1,500 g PRB fly ash, 300 grams powder methylene urea, and 80 grams urea from solution.


Fly Ash/Urea/Lime, comprising: 1,500 gm PRB fly ash, approximately 400 grams urea from urea solution, additional lime added (approximately 200 grams).


As will be appreciated, substrates other than fly ash, additives other than urea, and binders other than lime can be used in the above formulations.


In other formulations, the additive is combined with other chemicals to improve handing characteristics and/or support the desired reactions and/or inhibit thermal decomposition of the additive. For example, the additive, particularly solid amines or amides, whether supported or unsupported, may be encapsulated with a coating to alter flow properties or provide some protection to the materials against thermal decomposition in the combustion zone. Examples of such coatings include silanes, siloxanes, organosilanes, amorphous silica or clays.


In any of the above formulations, other thermally adsorbing materials may be applied to substantially inhibit or decrease the amount of nitrogenous component that degrades thermally during combustion. Such thermally adsorbing materials include, for example, amines and/or amides other than urea (e.g., monomethylamine and alternative reagent liquids).


The additive mixture can be in the form of a solid additive. It may be applied to a coal feed, pre-combustion, in the form of a solid additive. A common ratio in the additive mixture is from about one part thermal stability agent to one part additive to about four parts thermal stability agent to one part additive and more commonly from about 1.5 parts thermal stability agent to one part additive to about 2.50 parts thermal stability agent to one part additive.


Urea, a commonly used additive, is typically manufactured in a solid form in the form of prills. The process of manufacturing prills is well known in the art. Generally, the prills are formed by dripping urea through a “grate” for sizing, and allowing the dripped compound to dry. Prills commonly range in size from 1 mm to 4 mm and consist substantially of urea.


To form the additive mixture, the thermal stability agent (e.g., magnesium hydroxide fines or particles) can be mixed with the urea prior to the prilling process. Due to the added solid concentration in the urea prill, an additional stabilizing agent may be required. A preferred stabilizing agent is an alkaline earth metal oxide, such as calcium oxide (CaO), though other stabilizing agents known in the art could be used. The stabilizing agent is present in low levels—approximately 1% by weight—and is added prior to the prilling process. The additive created by this process is a prill with ratios of about 66 wt. % thermal stability agent (e.g., magnesium hydroxide), about 33 wt. % additive (e.g., urea), and about 1 wt. % stabilizing agent.


Once stabilized in prill form, the additive mixture may easily be transported to a plant for use. As disclosed in prior work, the prills are mixed in with the feed material at the desired weight ratio prior to combustion.


The thermal stability agent can be in the form of a liquid or slurry when contacted with the additive, thereby producing an additive mixture in the form of a liquid or slurry. For example, a magnesium hydroxide slurry was tested. This formulation was tested partly for the decomposition to MgO and to evaluate if it might help to slightly lower temperatures in the primary flame zone due to slurry moisture and endothermic decomposition. This formulation is relatively inexpensive and has proven safe in boiler injection. The formulation was made by blending a Mg(OH)2 slurry with urea and spraying on the coal, adding only about 1 to 2% moisture. Generally, when added in liquid or slurry form the additive mixture includes a dispersant. Any commonly used dispersant may be used; a present preferred dispersant is an alkali metal (e.g., sodium) lignosulfonate. When applied in slurry form, ratios are approximately 40 wt. % thermal stability agent (e.g., magnesium hydroxide), 20 wt. % additive (e.g., urea), 39 wt. % water, and 1 wt. % dispersant. This can actually involve the determination of two ratios independently. First, the ratio of thermal stability agent to additive [Mg(OH)2:Urea] is determined. This ratio typically runs from about 0.5:1 to 8:1, and more typically is about 2:1. With that ratio established, the ratio of water to additive [H2O:urea] can be determined. That ratio again runs typically from about 0.5:1 to 8:1, and more typically is about 2:1. The slurry is typically applied onto the coal feed shortly before combustion.


An alternative approach to a thermal stability agent, not involving a thermal stabilizing agent, utilizes a radical scavenger approach to reduce NOx by introducing materials to scavenge radicals (e.g., OH, O) to limit NO formation. Thermal NOx formation is governed by highly temperature-dependent chemical reactions provided by the extended Zeldovich mechanism:

O+N2custom charactercustom characterN+NO
N+O2custom charactercustom characterO+NO
N+OHcustom charactercustom characterH+NO


Examples of materials that can reduce NOx per the proposed radical scavenger method include alkali metal carbonates and bicarbonates (such as sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, and potassium bicarbonate), alkali metal hydroxides (such as sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide), other dissociable forms of alkali metals (such as sodium and potassium), and various forms of iron including FeO, Fe2O3, Fe3O4, and FeCl2. Sources of iron for the thermal stabilizing agent include BOF dust, mill fines, and other wastes. Engineered fine iron particle and lab grade products may also be utilized. Representative sources would include ADA-249™ and ADA's patented Cyclean™ technology, and additives discussed more fully in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,729,248, 6,773,471, 7,332,002, 8,124,036, and 8,293,196, each of which are incorporated herein by this reference.


EXPERIMENTAL

The following examples are provided to illustrate certain aspects, embodiments, and configurations of the disclosure and are not to be construed as limitations on the disclosure, as set forth in the appended claims. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified.


Example 1

The additive was applied to the coal simply by adding the additive to a barrel of pulverized coal and mixing to simulate the mixing and sizing that would occur as the coal passed through a pulverizer at a full scale unit. The treated fuel was fed to the boiler at 20 lbs per hour, at combustion temperatures which exceeded 2000° F. in a combustion environment that consisted of burners. This configuration demonstrated up to a 23% reduction in NOx, as measured by a Thermo Scientific NOX analyzer.


Slurried additive mixtures comprising magnesium hydroxide and urea solution were evaluated in a pilot tangentially-fired coal combustor. The additive mixture was added to coal as slurry, which in practice could be accomplished either individually or in combination, prior to combustion.


Coal was metered into the furnace via four corner-located coal feeders at the bottom of the furnace. Combustion air and overfire air were added at a controlled rate measured by electronic mass flow controllers. The combustor exit oxygen concentration was maintained within a narrow range, targeted at the identical oxygen for both baseline and while firing treated coal. Tests were maintained at stable combustion with batched coal feed for at least 3 hours or longer. A flue gas sample was extracted from the downstream gas duct after a particulate control device (fabric filter or electrostatic precipitator) in order to measure NOx and other vapor constituents in an extractive continuous emission monitor. The gas was sampled through an inertial separation probe (QSIS probe), further eliminating interference from particulate or moisture. NOx concentration was measured dry basis with a Thermo-Electron chemiluminescent NOx monitor. The measured concentration was corrected to constant oxygen and expressed in units of lbs/MMBtu. Percent reduction was calculated from the average baseline and the average with treated coal for a given combustion condition.


As disclosed in Table 1 below, a slurried additive mixture comprising 0.10 wt. % urea and 0.60 wt. % magnesium hydroxide (by weight of coal) yielded a 21.5% reduction in NOx as compared to the baseline condition.


A second additive mixture comprising 0.25 wt. % urea and 0.25 wt. % magnesium hydroxide (by weight of coal) yielded a 13.7% reduction in NOx as compared to the baseline condition.


Pilot testing also was conducted with melamine as the additive in place of urea. In a tested condition, an additive mixture comprising 0.10 wt. % melamine and 0.50 wt. % magnesium hydroxide (by weight of coal) was added to the coal. While a 2.4% reduction in NOx was achieved with this additive, the NOx reduction was lower than that of the urea-containing additives.


Example 2

Another series of tests were conducted at the same pilot combustor with further optimized additive rates and different PRB coal, using the same procedures. Table 2 summarizes the results. With magnesium hydroxide at 0.4 wt. % by weight of coal and urea at 0.2 wt. % by weight of coal produced 21% NOx reduction. Further refinement produced 22-23% NOx reduction with 0.3 wt. % by weight magnesium hydroxide and 0.15 wt. % urea (by weight of coal). This reduction has also been achieved with 0.25% by weight Mg(OH)2 and 0.125% by weight urea in other tests.















TABLE 1











Re-



Urea
Mg
Melamine
Baseline
Test
duction



(%
Hydroxide
(%
NOx
NOx
from



of coal
(% of coal
of coal
(lbs/
(lbs/
Baseline


Condition
feed)
feed)
feed)
MMBtu)
MMBtu)
(%)





















Test 1
0.25
0.25
0
0.41
0.39
5.5


Test 2
0.25
0.25
0
0.46
0.40
13.7


Test 2a
0.10
0.60
0
0.46
0.36
21.7


Test 3
0
0.50
0.10
0.46
0.45
2.4


Test 3a
0.10
0.20
0
0.46
0.44
4.9





















TABLE II







Mg
Baseline
Test
Reduction from



Urea
Hydroxide
NOx
NOx
Baseline


Condition
(% of coal feed)
(% of coal feed)
(lbs/MMBtu)
(lbs/MMBtu)
(%)







Test 4
0.10
0.60
0.46
0.41
10%


Test 5
0.20
0.40
0.46
0.36
21%


Test 6
0.15
0.30
0.46
0.35
23%


Test 7
0.15
0.30
0.46
0.36
22%









Example 3

Earlier testing conducted at the same tangentially-fired pilot combustion facility firing PRB coal evaluated a variety of additive materials comprising a nitrogenous additive formulated in a heat resistant solid matrix. The additives were evaluated at a number of combustion air-fuel conditions ranging from very low excess air (stoichiometric ratio, SR, of 0.7) to a condition close to unstaged combustion (SR 0.92 to 1), Tests with low excess air did not achieve any additional NOx reduction. Tests at more normal excess air (SR=0.92 to 1) did show consistent reduction of NOx with both a nitrogenous reducing additive (urea) and with iron oxides. A detailed chart of tested materials is disclosed below. In the tested examples, BOF dust was comprised of a mix of iron oxides, Fe(II) and Fe(III), Fe(II)Cl2, Fe2O3, and Fe3O4. A mixed solid labeled UFA was comprised of a powderized solid of coal fly ash and urea with lime binder. Powderized sodium bicarbonate (SBC) was also added. The additive, thermal stabilizing and binder materials were finely powderized and thoroughly mixed with coal in batches prior to combustion. As can be seen from the table, none of the tests were as successful as urea and magnesium hydroxide.

















TABLE III






Com-
UFA
Urea
Iron
SBC






bustion
(%
(%
Oxides
(ppm
Baseline
Test




Condition
of
of
(% of
of
NOx
NOx
NOx


Test
(Air-Fuel
coal
coal
coal
coal
(lbs/
(lbs/
Reduction


#
SR)
feed)
feed)
feed)
feed)
MMBtu)
MMBtu)
(%)























1-2
0.7
2.5%
0.5%
0.5%
1300
0.27
0.272
−0.74%


1-3
0.78
2.5%
0.5%
0.5%
1300
0.318
0.361
−13.52%


1-5
0.92
2.5%
0.5%
0.5%
1300
0.679
0.624
8.10%


2-2
0.7
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
700
0.27
0.274
−1.48%


2-3
0.78
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
700
0.318
0.323
−1.57%


2-5
0.92
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
700
0.679
0.574
15.46%


3-2
0.7
2.5%
0.5%
0.0%
1300
0.27
0.259
4.07%


3-3
0.78
2.5%
0.5%
0.0%
1300
0.318
0.33
−3.77%


3-5
0.92
2.5%
0.5%
0.0%
1300
0.679
0.633
6.77%









Example 4

NOx reduction tests were also performed at a second pulverized coal pilot facility with a single burner configured to simulate a wall fired boiler. During these tests, a slurry comprising 0.3% by weight of coal of Mg(OH)2 and 0.15% of urea on the coal was tested under staged combustion conditions. The results show that under practical combustion burner stoichiometric ratios, NOx reductions in excess of 20% can be achieved in a second unit designed to represent wall fired pulverized coal boilers.









TABLE IV







Fuel Identification: Powder River Basin











NOx Results

















NOx,

















ppm







corrected
NOx,
NOx















O2,
NOx,
to
lb/
Reduction,



BSR
%
ppm
3.50% O2
MMBtu
%





Feedstock
0.75
4.21
143
149
0.207



Refined 3
0.75
4.22
109
113
0.157
24.15


Feedstock
0.85
4.04
152
157
0.216



Refined 3
0.85
4.00
119
123
0.171
20.83









The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, and is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative aspects, embodiments, and configurations to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.


A number of variations and modifications of the disclosure can be used. It would be possible to provide for some features of the disclosure without providing others.


For example, in one alternative embodiment, any of the above methods, or any combination of the same, can be combined with activated carbon injection for mercury and NOx control. The activated carbon may be combined with halogens, either before or during injection.


In another embodiment, any of the above methods, or any combination of the same, can be combined with dry sorbent injection (DSI) technology. Other sorbent injection combinations, particularly those used in conjunction with halogen injection, are disclosed in Publication US-2012-0100053-A1, which is incorporated herein by this reference.


The present disclosure, in various aspects, embodiments, and configurations, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various aspects, embodiments, configurations, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the various aspects, aspects, embodiments, and configurations, after understanding the present disclosure. The present disclosure, in various aspects, embodiments, and configurations, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various aspects, embodiments, and configurations hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation.


The foregoing discussion of the disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the disclosure to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the disclosure are grouped together in one or more, aspects, embodiments, and configurations for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. The features of the aspects, embodiments, and configurations of the disclosure may be combined in alternate aspects, embodiments, and configurations other than those discussed above. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed disclosure requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed aspects, embodiments, and configurations. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the disclosure.


Moreover, though the description of the disclosure has included description of one or more aspects, embodiments, or configurations and certain variations and modifications, other variations, combinations, and modifications are within the scope of the disclosure, e.g., as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative aspects, embodiments, and configurations to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.

Claims
  • 1. A composition, comprising: a nitrogenous material comprising one or more of ammonia and an ammonia precursor;a binder; anda thermal stability agent comprising one or more of a metal hydroxide, a metal carbonate, a metal bicarbonate, and ash,wherein: the thermal stability agent is bound by the binder to the nitrogenous material, and a molar ratio of the thermal stability agent to the nitrogenous material ranges from about 1:1 to about 10:1.
  • 2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the thermal stability agent comprises the metal hydroxide and wherein the ammonia precursor is a compound that thermally decomposes or hydrolyzes to form one or more of ammonia gas, free radicals of ammonia, and amines.
  • 3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the thermal stability agent comprises the metal carbonate and wherein the ammonia precursor is one or more of an amine, an amide, cyanuric acid, a nitride, and a urea.
  • 4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the thermal stability agent comprises the metal bicarbonate and wherein the molar ratio of the thermal stability agent to the nitrogenous material ranges from about 0.5:1 to about 2:1.
  • 5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the thermal stability agent comprises the ash.
  • 6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the nitrogenous material comprises the ammonia and wherein the thermal stability agent forms, when the composition is combusted, one or more of a thermally protective barrier and a heat sink around the nitrogenous material to reduce thermal degradation of the nitrogenous material.
  • 7. The composition of claim 1, wherein the nitrogenous material comprises the ammonia precursor, wherein the nitrogenous material is in the form of particles having an exterior surface, and wherein the thermal stability agent is in contact with some, but not all of the exterior surface of the nitrogenous material particles.
  • 8. The composition of claim 1, wherein the nitrogenous material is in the form of particles having an exterior surface, and wherein the thermal stability agent is bound to and substantially surrounds the exterior surface of the nitrogenous material particles.
  • 9. The composition of claim 1, wherein the thermal stability agent comprises an alkali metal, an alkaline earth metal, or both.
  • 10. The composition of claim 1, wherein the thermal stability agent comprises calcium, magnesium, or both.
  • 11. The composition of claim 1, wherein the nitrogenous material is in the form of particles having a particle size distribution (P80) from about 20 to about 6 mesh (Tyler), wherein the nitrogenous material further comprise a substrate, and wherein the substrate is a porous matrix comprising one or more of zeolite, char, graphite, and ash.
  • 12. The composition of claim 1, wherein the binder is one or more of a wax, a wax derivative, a gum, a gum derivative, and an alkaline binding agent.
  • 13. The composition of claim 1, further comprising coal, wherein the coal is one or more of a high alkali coal, a high iron coal, and a high sulfur coal.
  • 14. The composition of claim 1, further comprising a halogen compound.
  • 15. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is in the form of one or more of a slurry, a sludge, and a solution.
  • 16. A composition, comprising: a nitrogenous material comprising one or more of ammonia, an amine, an amide, cyanuric acid, a nitride, and a urea; anda thermal stability agent comprising one or more of a metal hydroxide, a metal carbonate, a metal bicarbonate, and ash,wherein the thermal stability agent is bound to and substantially surrounds the nitrogenous material and forms, when the composition is combusted, one or more of a thermally protective barrier and a heat sink around the nitrogenous material to reduce thermal degradation of the nitrogenous material, andwherein a molar ratio of the thermal stability agent to the nitrogenous material ranges from about 1:1 to about 10:1.
  • 17. The composition of claim 16, further comprising a binder, wherein the binder is one or more of a wax, a wax derivative, a gum, a gum derivative, and an alkaline binding agent.
  • 18. The composition of claim 16, wherein the molar ratio of the thermal stability agent to the nitrogenous material ranges from about 0.5:1 to about 2:1.
  • 19. The composition of claim 16, wherein the thermal stability agent comprises one or more of an alkaline earth metal hydroxide, an alkaline earth metal carbonate, and an alkaline earth metal bicarbonate and wherein the thermal stability agent comprises calcium, magnesium, or both.
  • 20. A composition, comprising: a nitrogenous material comprising one or more of ammonia, an amine, an amide, cyanuric acid, a nitride, and a urea;a binder; anda thermal stability agent comprising one or more of an alkali metal hydroxide, an alkali metal carbonate, an alkali metal bicarbonate, an alkaline earth metal hydroxide, an alkaline earth metal carbonate, and an alkaline earth metal bicarbonate,wherein a molar ratio of the thermal stability agent to the nitrogenous material ranges from about 1:1 to about 10:1.
  • 21. The composition of claim 20, wherein the nitrogenous material is in the form of particles having an exterior surface, and wherein the thermal stability agent is in contact with some, but not all of the exterior surface of the nitrogenous material particles.
  • 22. The composition of claim 20, wherein the nitrogenous material is in the form of particles having an exterior surface, and wherein the thermal stability agent is bound to and substantially surrounds the exterior surface of the nitrogenous material particles.
  • 23. The composition of claim 20, wherein the thermal stability agent comprises one or more of the alkaline earth metal hydroxide, the alkaline earth metal carbonate, and the alkaline earth metal bicarbonate and wherein the thermal stability agent comprises calcium, magnesium, or both.
  • 24. The composition of claim 20, wherein the binder is one or more of a wax, a wax derivative, a gum, a gum derivative, and an alkaline binding agent.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

The present application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/941,522, filed on Mar. 30, 2018, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 10,767,130, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/964,441, filed on Aug. 12, 2013, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 9,957,454, which claims the benefits of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/682,040, filed Aug. 10, 2012; 61/704,290, filed Sep. 21, 2012; 61/724,634, filed Nov. 9, 2012; and 61/792,827, filed Mar. 15, 2013, all entitled “Method to Reduce Emissions of Nitrous Oxides from Coal-Fired Boilers”, each of which is incorporated herein by this reference in its entirety. Cross reference is made to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/471,015, filed May 14, 2012, entitled “Process to Reduce Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides and Mercury from Coal-Fired Boilers”, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/486,217, filed May 13, 2011, and 61/543,196, filed Oct. 4, 2011, each of which is incorporated herein by this reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (450)
Number Name Date Kind
208011 Eaton Sep 1878 A
224649 Child Feb 1880 A
346765 McIntyre Aug 1886 A
367014 Wandrey et al. Jul 1887 A
537998 Spring et al. Apr 1895 A
541025 Gray Jun 1895 A
685719 Harris Oct 1901 A
700888 Battistini May 1902 A
744908 Dallas Nov 1903 A
846338 McNamara Mar 1907 A
894110 Bloss Jul 1908 A
896875 Williams Aug 1908 A
896876 Williams Aug 1908 A
911960 Ellis Feb 1909 A
1112547 Morin Oct 1914 A
1183445 Foxwell May 1916 A
1984164 Stock Dec 1934 A
2059388 Nelms Nov 1936 A
2077298 Zelger Apr 1937 A
2089599 Crecelius Aug 1937 A
2511288 Morrell et al. Jun 1950 A
3194629 Dreibelbis et al. Jul 1965 A
3599610 Spector Aug 1971 A
3662523 Revoir et al. May 1972 A
3725530 Kawase et al. Apr 1973 A
3754074 Grantham Aug 1973 A
3764496 Hultman et al. Oct 1973 A
3786619 Melkersson et al. Jan 1974 A
3803803 Raduly et al. Apr 1974 A
3823676 Cook et al. Jul 1974 A
3826618 Capuano Jul 1974 A
3838190 Birke et al. Sep 1974 A
3849267 Hilgen et al. Nov 1974 A
3849537 Allgulin Nov 1974 A
3851042 Minnick Nov 1974 A
3876393 Kasai et al. Apr 1975 A
3956458 Anderson May 1976 A
3961020 Seki Jun 1976 A
3974254 de la Cuadra Herra et al. Aug 1976 A
4075282 Storp et al. Feb 1978 A
4094777 Sugier et al. Jun 1978 A
4101631 Ambrosini et al. Jul 1978 A
4115518 Delmon et al. Sep 1978 A
4140654 Yoshioka et al. Feb 1979 A
4148613 Myers Apr 1979 A
4174373 Yoshida et al. Nov 1979 A
4196173 Dejong et al. Apr 1980 A
4212853 Fukui Jul 1980 A
4233274 Allgulin Nov 1980 A
4262610 Hein et al. Apr 1981 A
4273747 Rasmussen Jun 1981 A
4342192 Heyn et al. Aug 1982 A
4387653 Voss Jun 1983 A
4427630 Aibe et al. Jan 1984 A
4440100 Michelfelder et al. Apr 1984 A
4474896 Chao Oct 1984 A
4500327 Nishino et al. Feb 1985 A
4503785 Scocca Mar 1985 A
4519995 Schrofelbauer et al. May 1985 A
4555392 Steinberg Nov 1985 A
4578256 Nishino et al. Mar 1986 A
4626418 College et al. Dec 1986 A
4678481 Diep Jul 1987 A
4693731 Tarakad et al. Sep 1987 A
4708853 Matviya et al. Nov 1987 A
4729882 Ide et al. Mar 1988 A
4741278 Franke et al. May 1988 A
4751065 Bowers Jun 1988 A
4758371 Bhatia Jul 1988 A
4758418 Yoo et al. Jul 1988 A
4772455 Izumi et al. Sep 1988 A
4779207 Woracek et al. Oct 1988 A
4786483 Audeh Nov 1988 A
4803059 Sullivan et al. Feb 1989 A
4804521 Rochelle et al. Feb 1989 A
4807542 Dykema Feb 1989 A
4814152 Yan Mar 1989 A
4820318 Chang et al. Apr 1989 A
4824441 Kindig Apr 1989 A
4830829 Craig, Jr. May 1989 A
4873930 Egense et al. Oct 1989 A
4876025 Roydhouse Oct 1989 A
4886519 Hayes et al. Dec 1989 A
4889698 Moller et al. Dec 1989 A
4892567 Yan Jan 1990 A
4915818 Yan Apr 1990 A
4917862 Kraw et al. Apr 1990 A
4936047 Feldmann et al. Jun 1990 A
4956162 Smith et al. Sep 1990 A
4964889 Chao Oct 1990 A
5013358 Ball et al. May 1991 A
5024171 Krigmont et al. Jun 1991 A
5047219 Epperly et al. Sep 1991 A
5049163 Huang et al. Sep 1991 A
5058514 Mozes et al. Oct 1991 A
5116793 Chao et al. May 1992 A
5120516 Ham et al. Jun 1992 A
5122353 Valentine Jun 1992 A
5124135 Girrbach et al. Jun 1992 A
5126300 Pinnavaia et al. Jun 1992 A
5202301 McNamara Apr 1993 A
5238488 Wilhelm Aug 1993 A
5238629 Davidson Aug 1993 A
5245120 Srinivasachar et al. Sep 1993 A
5277135 Dubin Jan 1994 A
5288306 Aibe et al. Feb 1994 A
5300137 Weyand et al. Apr 1994 A
5320817 Hardwick et al. Jun 1994 A
5328673 Kaczur et al. Jul 1994 A
5336835 McNamara Aug 1994 A
5346674 Weinwurm et al. Sep 1994 A
5350728 Cameron et al. Sep 1994 A
5352647 Suchenwirth Oct 1994 A
5354363 Brown, Jr. et al. Oct 1994 A
5356611 Herkelmann et al. Oct 1994 A
5368617 Kindig Nov 1994 A
5403548 Aibe et al. Apr 1995 A
5409522 Durham et al. Apr 1995 A
5419834 Straten May 1995 A
5435843 Roy et al. Jul 1995 A
5435980 Felsvang et al. Jul 1995 A
5447703 Baer et al. Sep 1995 A
5460643 Hasenpusch et al. Oct 1995 A
5480619 Johnson et al. Jan 1996 A
5499587 Rodriquez et al. Mar 1996 A
5502021 Schuster Mar 1996 A
5505746 Chriswell et al. Apr 1996 A
5505766 Chang Apr 1996 A
5520898 Pinnavaia et al. May 1996 A
5536482 Diep et al. Jul 1996 A
5569436 Lerner Oct 1996 A
5571490 Bronicki et al. Nov 1996 A
5575982 Reiss et al. Nov 1996 A
5587003 Bulow et al. Dec 1996 A
5607496 Brooks Mar 1997 A
5607654 Lerner Mar 1997 A
5618508 Suchenwirth et al. Apr 1997 A
5635150 Coughlin Jun 1997 A
5648508 Yaghi Jul 1997 A
5670122 Zamansky et al. Sep 1997 A
5672323 Bhat et al. Sep 1997 A
5674459 Gohara et al. Oct 1997 A
5679957 Durham et al. Oct 1997 A
5695726 Lerner Dec 1997 A
5733360 Feldman et al. Mar 1998 A
5733516 DeBerry Mar 1998 A
5738834 DeBerry Apr 1998 A
5744109 Sitges Menendez et al. Apr 1998 A
5785932 Helfritch Jul 1998 A
5787823 Knowles Aug 1998 A
5809910 Svendssen Sep 1998 A
5809911 Feizollahi Sep 1998 A
5810910 Ludwig et al. Sep 1998 A
5827352 Altman et al. Oct 1998 A
5871703 Alix et al. Feb 1999 A
5875722 Gosselin et al. Mar 1999 A
5891324 Ohtsuka Apr 1999 A
5897688 Voogt et al. Apr 1999 A
5900042 Mendelsohn et al. May 1999 A
5910292 Alvarez, Jr. et al. Jun 1999 A
5989506 Markovs Nov 1999 A
6001152 Sinha Dec 1999 A
6013593 Lee et al. Jan 2000 A
6024931 Hanulik Feb 2000 A
6027551 Hwang et al. Feb 2000 A
6080281 Attia Jun 2000 A
6083403 Tang Jul 2000 A
6117403 Alix et al. Sep 2000 A
6132692 Alix et al. Oct 2000 A
6136072 Sjostrom et al. Oct 2000 A
6136281 Meischen et al. Oct 2000 A
6136749 Gadkaree Oct 2000 A
6202574 Liljedahl et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214304 Rosenthal et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231643 Pasic et al. May 2001 B1
6248217 Biswas et al. Jun 2001 B1
6250235 Oehr et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258334 Gadkaree et al. Jul 2001 B1
6284199 Downs et al. Sep 2001 B1
6284208 Thomassen Sep 2001 B1
6294139 Vicard et al. Sep 2001 B1
6328939 Amrhein Dec 2001 B1
6348178 Sudduth et al. Feb 2002 B1
6368511 Weissenberg et al. Apr 2002 B1
6372187 Madden et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375909 Dangtran et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383981 Blakenship et al. May 2002 B1
6447740 Caldwell et al. Sep 2002 B1
6475451 Leppin et al. Nov 2002 B1
6521021 Pennline et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524371 El-Shoubary et al. Feb 2003 B2
6528030 Madden et al. Mar 2003 B2
6533842 Maes et al. Mar 2003 B1
6558454 Chang et al. May 2003 B1
6576585 Fischer et al. Jun 2003 B2
6582497 Maes et al. Jun 2003 B1
6589318 El-Shoubary et al. Jul 2003 B2
6610263 Pahlman et al. Aug 2003 B2
6613110 Sanyal Sep 2003 B2
6638347 El-Shoubary et al. Oct 2003 B2
6638485 Iida et al. Oct 2003 B1
6649082 Hayasaka et al. Nov 2003 B2
6682709 Sudduth et al. Jan 2004 B2
6694900 Lissianski et al. Feb 2004 B2
6702569 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719828 Lovell et al. Apr 2004 B1
6726888 Lanier et al. Apr 2004 B2
6729248 Johnson et al. May 2004 B2
6732055 Bagepalli et al. May 2004 B2
6737031 Beal et al. May 2004 B2
6773471 Johnson et al. Aug 2004 B2
6787742 Kansa et al. Sep 2004 B2
6790420 Breen et al. Sep 2004 B2
6808692 Oehr Oct 2004 B2
6818043 Chang et al. Nov 2004 B1
6827837 Minter Dec 2004 B2
6841513 El-Shoubary et al. Jan 2005 B2
6848374 Srinivasachar et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855859 Nolan et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860911 Hundley Mar 2005 B2
6878358 Vosteen et al. Apr 2005 B2
6883444 Logan et al. Apr 2005 B2
6916762 Shibuya et al. Jul 2005 B2
6942840 Broderick Sep 2005 B1
6945925 Pooler et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953494 Nelson, Jr. Oct 2005 B2
6960329 Sellakumar Nov 2005 B2
6962617 Simpson Nov 2005 B2
6969494 Herbst Nov 2005 B2
6972120 Holste et al. Dec 2005 B2
6974564 Biermann Dec 2005 B2
6975975 Fasca Dec 2005 B2
7008603 Brooks et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013817 Stowe, Jr. et al. Mar 2006 B2
7017330 Bellows Mar 2006 B2
7111591 Schwab et al. Sep 2006 B2
7118720 Mendelsohn et al. Oct 2006 B1
7141091 Chang Nov 2006 B2
7153481 Bengtsson et al. Dec 2006 B2
7156959 Herbst Jan 2007 B2
7198769 Cichanowicz Apr 2007 B2
7211707 Axtell et al. May 2007 B2
7217401 Ramme et al. May 2007 B2
7250387 Durante et al. Jul 2007 B2
7270063 Aradi et al. Sep 2007 B2
7332002 Johnson et al. Feb 2008 B2
7361209 Durham et al. Apr 2008 B1
7381380 Herbst Jun 2008 B2
7381387 Lissianski et al. Jun 2008 B2
7381388 Cooper et al. Jun 2008 B2
7384615 Boardman et al. Jun 2008 B2
7413719 Digdon Aug 2008 B2
7416137 Hagen et al. Aug 2008 B2
7430969 Stowe, Jr. et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435286 Olson et al. Oct 2008 B2
7442239 Armstrong et al. Oct 2008 B2
7452392 Nick et al. Nov 2008 B2
7468170 Comrie Dec 2008 B2
7473303 Higgins et al. Jan 2009 B1
7479215 Carson et al. Jan 2009 B2
7479263 Chang et al. Jan 2009 B2
7494632 Klunder Feb 2009 B1
7497076 Funk et al. Mar 2009 B2
7507083 Comrie Mar 2009 B2
7514052 Lissianski et al. Apr 2009 B2
7514053 Johnson et al. Apr 2009 B2
7517511 Schofield Apr 2009 B2
7521032 Honjo et al. Apr 2009 B2
7524473 Lindau et al. Apr 2009 B2
7544338 Honjo et al. Jun 2009 B2
7544339 Lissianski et al. Jun 2009 B2
7563311 Graham Jul 2009 B2
7611564 McChesney et al. Nov 2009 B2
7615101 Holmes et al. Nov 2009 B2
7622092 Honjo et al. Nov 2009 B2
7651541 Hundley et al. Jan 2010 B2
7674442 Comrie Mar 2010 B2
7712306 White et al. May 2010 B2
7713503 Maly et al. May 2010 B2
7722843 Srinivasachar May 2010 B1
7727307 Winkler Jun 2010 B2
7758827 Comrie Jul 2010 B2
7767174 Liu et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776301 Comrie Aug 2010 B2
7780765 Srinivasachar et al. Aug 2010 B2
7862630 Hundley et al. Jan 2011 B2
7906090 Ukai et al. Mar 2011 B2
7938571 Irvine May 2011 B1
7955577 Comrie Jun 2011 B2
7988939 Comrie Aug 2011 B2
8007749 Chang et al. Aug 2011 B2
8017550 Chao et al. Sep 2011 B2
8069797 Srinivasachar et al. Dec 2011 B2
8071060 Ukai et al. Dec 2011 B2
8080088 Srinivasachar Dec 2011 B1
8101144 Sasson et al. Jan 2012 B2
8124036 Baldrey et al. Feb 2012 B1
8168149 Gal et al. May 2012 B2
8216535 Pollack et al. Jul 2012 B2
8226913 Comrie Jul 2012 B2
8293196 Baldrey et al. Oct 2012 B1
8303919 Gadgil et al. Nov 2012 B2
8312822 Holmes et al. Nov 2012 B2
8313323 Comrie Nov 2012 B2
8372362 Durham et al. Feb 2013 B2
8420034 Nochi et al. Apr 2013 B2
8481455 Jain et al. Jul 2013 B1
8496894 Durham et al. Jul 2013 B2
8524179 Durham et al. Sep 2013 B2
8574324 Comrie Nov 2013 B2
8652235 Olson et al. Feb 2014 B2
8663594 Kawamura et al. Mar 2014 B2
8807056 Holmes et al. Aug 2014 B2
8845986 Senior et al. Sep 2014 B2
8865099 Gray et al. Oct 2014 B1
8883099 Sjostrom et al. Nov 2014 B2
8919266 Johnson et al. Dec 2014 B2
8951487 Durham et al. Feb 2015 B2
8980207 Gray et al. Mar 2015 B1
9221013 Sjostrom et al. Dec 2015 B2
9238782 Senior et al. Jan 2016 B2
9308493 Filippelli et al. Apr 2016 B2
9352275 Durham et al. May 2016 B2
9409123 Sjostrom et al. Aug 2016 B2
9416967 Comrie Aug 2016 B2
9555369 Moore et al. Jan 2017 B2
9657942 Durham et al. May 2017 B2
9822973 Comrie Nov 2017 B2
9827551 Hardwick et al. Nov 2017 B2
9850442 Senior et al. Dec 2017 B2
9884286 Sjostrom Feb 2018 B2
9889405 Sjostrom et al. Feb 2018 B2
9889451 Filippelli et al. Feb 2018 B2
9957454 Morris et al. May 2018 B2
10124293 Durham et al. Nov 2018 B2
10159931 Sjostrom et al. Dec 2018 B2
10427096 Sjostrom et al. Oct 2019 B2
10465137 Senior et al. Nov 2019 B2
10589292 Filippelo et al. Mar 2020 B2
10730015 Durham et al. Aug 2020 B2
10731095 Senior et al. Aug 2020 B2
10758863 Sjostrom et al. Sep 2020 B2
10767130 Morris et al. Sep 2020 B2
20020114749 Cole Aug 2002 A1
20020134242 Yang et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020150516 Pahlman Oct 2002 A1
20030065236 Vosteen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030099585 Allgulin May 2003 A1
20030104937 Sinha Jun 2003 A1
20030164309 Nakamura et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030166988 Hazen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030192234 Logan et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030196578 Logan et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030206843 Nelson, Jr. Nov 2003 A1
20030206846 Jangbarwala Nov 2003 A1
20030226312 Roos et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040013589 Vosteen et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040040438 Baldrey et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040063210 Steichen et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040076570 Jia Apr 2004 A1
20040109800 Pahlman Jun 2004 A1
20040129607 Slater et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050019240 Lu et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050026008 Heaton et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050074380 Hammel et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050106516 Payne et al. May 2005 A1
20050169824 Downs et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050227146 Ghantous et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050260112 Hensman Nov 2005 A1
20060027488 Gauthier Feb 2006 A1
20060029531 Breen et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060051270 Brunette Mar 2006 A1
20060090678 Kriech May 2006 A1
20060112823 Avin Jun 2006 A1
20060124444 Nakamura et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060185226 McDonald et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060191835 Petrik et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060205592 Chao et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070140940 Varma et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156288 Wroblewski et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070167309 Olson Jul 2007 A1
20070168213 Comrie Jul 2007 A1
20070179056 Baek et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070180990 Downs et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070184394 Comrie Aug 2007 A1
20070234902 Fair et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070281253 Toqan Dec 2007 A1
20070295347 Paine et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080017337 Duggirala Jan 2008 A1
20080090951 Mao et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080107579 Downs et al. May 2008 A1
20080115704 Berry et al. May 2008 A1
20080134888 Chao et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080182747 Sinha Jul 2008 A1
20080207443 Gadkaree et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080220387 Payne et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080292512 Kang Nov 2008 A1
20090007785 Kimura et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090031708 Schmidt Feb 2009 A1
20090031929 Boardman et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090062119 Olson et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090081092 Yang et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090104097 Dunson, Jr. Apr 2009 A1
20090136401 Yang et al. May 2009 A1
20090148372 Keiser Jun 2009 A1
20090235848 Eiteneer et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090287013 Morrison Nov 2009 A1
20090320678 Chang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100025302 Sato et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100047146 Olson et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100189617 Hundley et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100189618 White et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110030592 Baldrey et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110076210 Pollack et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110168018 Mohamadalizadeh et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110250111 Pollack et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110262873 Nalepa et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110281222 Comrie Nov 2011 A1
20120124893 McRobbie May 2012 A1
20120183458 Olson et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120216729 Baldrey et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120272877 Comrie Nov 2012 A1
20120285352 Senior Nov 2012 A1
20120311924 Richardson et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130074745 Comrie Mar 2013 A1
20130078169 LaFlesh et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130139738 Grubbström et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130149206 Ukai et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130280156 Olson et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130312646 Comrie Nov 2013 A1
20140030178 Martin Jan 2014 A1
20140140908 Nalepa et al. May 2014 A1
20140141380 Comrie May 2014 A1
20140202069 Aradi et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140213429 Nochi et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140245936 Pollack et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140271418 Keiser et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140299028 Kotch et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140308191 Mazyck et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140341793 Holmes et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150086457 Kagawa et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150096480 Comrie Apr 2015 A1
20160025337 Comrie Jan 2016 A1
20160166982 Holmes et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160339385 Mimna et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170050147 Denny et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170292700 Comrie Oct 2017 A1
20180224121 Comrie Aug 2018 A1
20190321778 Sjostrom et al. Oct 2019 A1
20200230550 Sjostrom et al. Jul 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (110)
Number Date Country
1067835 Dec 1979 CA
1099490 Apr 1981 CA
2026056 Mar 1992 CA
2150529 Dec 1995 CA
2400898 Aug 2001 CA
2418578 Aug 2003 CA
2435474 Jan 2004 CA
2584327 Apr 2006 CA
2641311 Aug 2007 CA
2737281 Apr 2010 CA
1048173 Jan 1991 CN
1177628 Apr 1998 CN
1354230 Jun 2002 CN
1382657 Dec 2002 CN
1421515 Jun 2003 CN
1488423 Apr 2004 CN
101048218 Oct 2007 CN
101053820 Oct 2007 CN
101175550 May 2008 CN
101347722 Jan 2009 CN
101489647 Jul 2009 CN
101816922 Sep 2010 CN
101932376 Dec 2010 CN
102413899 Apr 2012 CN
105381680 Mar 2016 CN
2630202 Feb 1977 DE
3426059 Jan 1986 DE
3615759 Nov 1987 DE
3628963 Mar 1988 DE
3711503 Oct 1988 DE
3918292 Apr 1990 DE
4218672 Aug 1993 DE
4308388 Oct 1993 DE
4339777 May 1995 DE
4422661 Jan 1996 DE
19520127 Dec 1996 DE
19745191 Apr 1999 DE
19850054 May 2000 DE
10233173 Jul 2002 DE
0208036 Jan 1987 EP
0208490 Jan 1987 EP
0220075 Apr 1987 EP
0254697 Jan 1988 EP
0274132 Jul 1988 EP
0433677 Jun 1991 EP
0435848 Jul 1991 EP
0628341 Dec 1994 EP
0666098 Aug 1995 EP
0709128 May 1996 EP
0794240 Sep 1997 EP
0908217 Apr 1999 EP
1040865 Oct 2000 EP
1213046 Oct 2001 EP
1199354 Apr 2002 EP
1271053 Jan 2003 EP
1386655 Feb 2004 EP
1570894 Sep 2005 EP
1903092 Mar 2008 EP
2452740 May 2012 EP
2443580 Feb 2014 ES
1394547 Apr 1965 FR
1121845 Jul 1968 GB
2122916 Jan 1984 GB
2441885 Mar 2008 GB
49-53591 May 1974 JP
49-53593 May 1974 JP
49-53594 May 1974 JP
59-10343 Jan 1984 JP
59-76537 May 1984 JP
59-160534 Sep 1984 JP
63-100918 May 1988 JP
H02-303519 Dec 1990 JP
H10-5537 Jan 1998 JP
10-109016 Apr 1998 JP
2000-197811 Jul 2000 JP
2000-205525 Jul 2000 JP
2000-325747 Nov 2000 JP
2001-347131 Dec 2001 JP
2003-065522 Mar 2003 JP
2004-066229 Mar 2004 JP
2005-230810 Sep 2005 JP
5064389 Oct 2012 JP
1020027006149 May 2002 KR
2004-0010276 Jan 2004 KR
100440845 Jul 2004 KR
2007-138432 Apr 2009 RU
2515988 May 2014 RU
2535684 Dec 2014 RU
WO 9614137 May 1996 WO
WO 9630318 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9744500 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9815357 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9958228 Nov 1999 WO
WO 200138787 May 2001 WO
WO 0162368 Aug 2001 WO
WO 0228513 Apr 2002 WO
WO 03072241 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2003093518 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2004089501 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004094024 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2005092477 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2006037213 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2006039007 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2006091635 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2006096993 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2006099611 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2009018539 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009107731 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2010123609 Oct 2010 WO
2003-05568 Jul 2004 ZA
Non-Patent Literature Citations (201)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 17/068,579, filed Oct. 12, 2020, Sjostrom et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/553,849, filed Oct. 27, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,124,036.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/198,381, filed Aug. 4, 2011 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,293,196.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,427, filed Feb. 4, 2011 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,372,362.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/281,040, filed Oct. 25, 2011 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,496,894.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/925,311, filed Jun. 24, 2013 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,352,275.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,233, filed Jul. 23, 2014 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,221,013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/949,524, filed Nov. 23, 2015 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,884,286.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/850,780, filed Dec. 21, 2017 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,427,096.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/603,239, filed Jul. 3, 2019.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/471,015, filed May 14, 2012 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,845,986.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/484,001, filed Sep. 11, 2014 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,238,782.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/958,327, filed Dec. 3, 2015 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,850,442.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/812,993, filed Nov. 14, 2017 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,465,137.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/590,178, filed Oct. 1, 2019 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,731,095.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/909,638, filed Jun. 23, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/281,066, filed Oct. 25, 2011 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,524,179.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/920,658, filed Jun. 18, 2013 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,951,487.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/604,153, filed Jan. 23, 2015 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,657,942.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/488,244, filed Apr. 14, 2017 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,124,293.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/186,187, filed Nov. 9, 2018 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,730,015.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/910,901, filed Jun. 24, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/861,162, filed Apr. 11, 2013 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,883,099.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/512,142, filed Oct. 10, 2014 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,409,123.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/217,749, filed Jul. 22, 2016 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,889,405.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/694,536, filed Sep. 1, 2017 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,159,931.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/188,758, filed Nov. 13, 2018 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,758,863.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/834,685, filed Mar. 30, 2020.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,441, filed Aug. 12, 2013 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,957,454.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,522, filed Mar. 30, 2018 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,767,130.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/460,817, filed Aug. 15, 2014 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,493.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/096,056, filed Apr. 11, 2016 now U.S. Pat. No. 9,889,451.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/842,636, filed Dec. 14, 2017 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,589,292.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/909,638, filed Jun. 23, 2020, Senior.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/910,901, filed Jun. 24, 2020, Durham.
“Continuous Emissions Monitors (CEMs): Field Studies of Dioxin/Furan CEMs,” printed on Apr. 22, 2012, available at www.ejnet.org/toxics/cems/dioxin.html, 5 pages.
“DOE Announces Further Field Testing of Advanced Mercury Control Technologies, Six Projects Selected in Round 2 to Address Future Power Plant Mercury Reduction Initiatives,” TECHNews From the National Energy Technology Laboratory, Nov. 5, 2004, available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/TechNews/tn_mercury-control.html, printed on Jun. 3, 2009, pp. 1-2.
“Enhanced Mercury Control: KNX™ Coal Additive Technology,” Alstom Power Inc., printed Aug. 3, 2006, 1 page.
“Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control at Great River Energy Coal Creek Station,” ADA Environmental Solutions, Nov. 16-20, 2003 Final Report, Electric Power Research Institute, issued Mar. 3, 2004, 32 pages.
“Exclusive license agreement for an innovative mercury oxidation technology,” Alstom Power Inc., printed Nov. 2, 2006, 1 page.
“Full-Scale Testing of Enhanced Mercury Control Technologies for Wet FGD Systems: Final Report for the Period Oct. 1, 2000 to Jun. 30, 2002,” submitted by McDermott Technology, Inc., May 7, 2003, 151 pages.
“Gas Phase Filtration,” Vaihtoilma White Air Oy, date unknown, 3 pages.
“Impregnated Activated Carbon,” Products and Technologies Website, as early as 1999, available at http://www.calgoncarbon.com/product/impregnated.html, printed on Dec. 18, 1999, p. 1.
“Integrating Flue Gas Conditioning with More Effective Mercury Control,” Power Engineering, Jun. 17, 2014, retrieved from www.power-eng.com/articles/print/volume-118/issue-6/features/integrating-flue-gas-conditioning-with-more-effective-mercury-control, 9 pages.
“Kaolinite Sorbent for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Incinerated Lubricating Oils,” EPA Grant No. R828598C027, 1996, retrieved from https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/index.cfm/fuseaction/display.highlight/abstract/1166, 7 pages.
“Mercury Emission Control Utilizing the Chem-Mod Process,” Chem-Mod, EUEC 2011, 34 pages (submitted in 2 parts).
“Mercury Study Report to Congress—vol. VIII: An Evaluation of Mercury Control Technologies and Costs,” U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards and Office of Research and Development, Dec. 1997, 207 pages.
“Mercury,” Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook 1998, World Bank Group, effective Jul. 1998, pp. 219-222.
“Nusorb® Mersorb® Family of Adsorbents for Mercury Control,” Nucon International Inc., date unknown, 3 pages.
“Protecting Human Health. Mercury Poisoning,” US EPA Website, as early as Oct. 8, 1999, availabie at http://www.epa.gov/region02/health/mercury/, printed on Feb. 5, 2002, pp. 1-4.
“Sample Collection Media: Sorbent Sample Tubes,” SKC 1997 Comprehensive Catalog & Air Sampling Guide: The Essential Reference for Air Sampling, pp. 23-24.
“Sodium Hypochlorite,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_hypochlorite (page last modified on Jul. 7, 2011 at 18:12), 7 pages.
“Texas Genco, EPRI, and URS Corporation Test Innovative Mercury Control Method at Limestone Station—Technology Aims to Capture More Mercury from Power Plant Exhaust,” News Release, Jan. 11, 2005, available at http://amptest.epri.com/corporate/discover_epri/news/2005/011105_mercury.html, printed on Apr. 24, 2009, pp. 1-2.
“The Fire Below: Spontaneous combustion in Coal,” U.S. Department of Energy, Environmental Safety & Health Bulletin, DOE/EH-0320, May 1993, Issue No. 93-4, 9 pages.
“Incineration,” Focus on your success, Bayer Industry Services, retrieved from www.entsorgung.bayer.com/index.cfmPAGE-ID=301, Jun. 2, 2005, 2 pages.
Anders et al., “Selenium in Coal-Fired Steam Plant Emissions,” Environmental Science & Technology, 1975, vol. 9, No. 9, pp. 856-858.
Ariya et al., “Reactions of Gaseous Mercury with Atomic and Molecular Halogens: Kinetics, Product Studies, and Atmospheric Implications,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 2002, vol. 106(32), pp. 7310-7320.
Bansal et al., Active Carbon, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1989, pp. 1-3, 24-29, 391-394, 457.
Beer, J. M., “Combustion technology developments in power generation in response to environmental challenges,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2000, vol. 26, pp. 301-327.
Biswas et al., “Control of Toxic Metal Emissions from Combustors Using Sorbents: A Review,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., Feb. 1998, vol. 48, pp. 113-127.
Bloom, “Mercury Speciation in Flue Gases: Overcoming the Analytical Difficulties,” presented at EPRI Conference, Managing Hazardous Air Pollutants, State of the Arts, Washington D.C., Nov. 1991, pp. 148-160.
Blythe et al., “Investigation of Mercury Control by Wet FGD Systems,” Power Plant Air Pollution Mega Symposium, Baltimore, MD, Aug. 20-23, 2012, 16 pages.
Blythe et al., “Optimization of Mercury Control on a New 800-MW PRB-Fired Power Plant,” Power Plant Air Pollution Mega Symposium, Baltimore, MD, Aug. 20-23, 2012, 14 pages.
Brigatti et al., “Mercury adsorption by montmorillonite and vermiculite: a combined XRD, TG-MS, and EXAFS study,” Applied Clay Science, 2005, vol. 28, pp. 1-8.
Brown et al., “Mercury Measurement and Its Control: What We Know, Have Learned, and Need to Further Investigate,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc, Jun. 1999, pp. 1-97.
Buschmann et al., “The KNX™ Coal Additive Technology a Simple Solution for Mercury Emissions Control,” Alstom Power Environment, Dec. 2005, pp. 1-7.
Bustard et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control on Coal-Fired Power Plants,” Air Quality III, ADA Environmental Solutions, LLC, Arlington, VA, Sep. 12, 2002, 15 pages.
Butz et al., “Options for Mercury Removal from Coal-Fired Flue Gas Streams: Pilot-Scale Research on Activated Carbon, Alternative and Regenerable Sorbents,” 17th Annual Int. Pittsburgh Coal Conf. Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, Sep. 11-14, 2000, 25 pages.
Calgon Carbon product and bulletin webpages, printed Jul. 1, 2001, 11 pages.
Cao et al., “Impacts of Halogen Additions on Mercury Oxidation, in a Slipstream Selective Catalyst Reduction (SCR), Reactor When Burning Sub-Bituminous Coal,” Environ. Sci. Technol. XXXX, xxx, 000-000, accepted Oct. 22, 2007, pp. A-F.
Carey et al., “Factors Affecting Mercury Control in Utility Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., Dec. 1998, vol. 48, pp. 1166-1174.
De Vito et al., “Sampling and Analysis of Mercury in Combustion Flue Gas,” Presented at the Second International Conference on Managing Hazardous Air Pollutants, Washington, DC, Jul. 13-15, 1993, pp. VII39-VII-65.
Dillon et al., “Preparing for New Multi-Pollutant Regulations with Multiple Low Capital Approaches,” Paper #2012-A-131-Mega, AWMA, MEGA 2012 conference, retrieved from http://www.cleancoalsolutions.com/library-resources/preparing-for-new-multi-pollutant-regulations-with-multiple-low-capital-approaches/, 20 pages.
Donnet et al., eds., Carbon Black: Science and Technology, 2nd Edition, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1993, pp. 182-187, 218-219.
Dunham et al., “Investigation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control in Coal-Fired Boilers,” Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, Sep. 10, 1998, 120 pages.
Durham et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of Mercury Control by Injecting Activated Carbon Upstream of ESPS,” Air Quality IV Conference, ADA Environmental Solutions, Littleton, Colorado, Sep. 2003, 15 pages.
Edwards et al., “A Study of Gas-Phase Mercury Speciation Using Detailed Chemical Kinetics,” in Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, vol. 51, Jun. 2001, pp. 869-877.
Element Analysis of COALQUAL Data; http://energy.er.usgs.gov/temp/1301072102.htm, printed Mar. 25, 2011, 7 pages.
Elliott, “Standard Handbook of PowerPlant Engineering,” excerpts from pp. 4.77-4.78, 4.109-4.110, 6.3-6.4, 6.57-6.63, McGraw Hill, Inc., 1989, 15 pages.
Fabian et al., “How Bayer incinerates wastes,” Hydrocarbon Processing, Apr. 1979, pp. 183-192.
Felsvang et al., “Activated Carbon Injection in Spray Dryer/ESP/FF for Mercury and Toxics Control,” 1993, pp. 1-35.
Felsvang, K. et al., “Air Toxics Control by Spray Dryer,” Presented at the 1993 SO2 Control Symposium, Aug. 24-27, 1993, Boston, MA, 16 pages.
Felsvang, K. et al., “Control of Air Toxics by Dry FGDSystems,” Power-Gen '92 Conference, 5th International Conference & Exhibition for the Power Generating Industries, Orlando, FL, Nov. 17-19, 1992, pp. 189-208.
Fujiwara et al., “Mercury transformation behavior on a bench-scale coal combustion furnace,” Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2001, vol. 47, pp. 395-404.
Galbreath et al., “Mercury Transformations in Coal Combustion Flue Gas,” Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, vol. 65-66, pp. 289-310.
Gale, “Mercury Adsorption and Oxidation Kinetics in Coal-Fired Flue Gas,” Proceedings of the 30th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems, 2005, pp. 979-990.
Gale, “Mercury Control with Calcium-Based Sorbents and Oxidizing Agents,” Final Report of Southern Research Institute, Jul. 2005, 137 pages.
Gale, “Mercury Control with Calcium-Based Sorbents and Oxidizing Agents,” Southern Research Institute, Mercury Control Technology R&D Program Review Meeting, Aug. 12-13, 2003, 25 pages.
Gale et al., “Mercury Speciation as a Function of Flue Gas Chlorine Content and Composition in a 1 MW Semi-Industrial Scale Coal-Fired Facility,” In Proceedings of the Mega Symposium and Air & Waste Management Association's Specialty Conference, Washington, DC, May 19-22, 2003, Paper 28, 19 pages.
Geiger et al, “Einfluß des Schwefels auf Die Doxin-und Furanbuilding bei der Klärschlammverbrennung,” VGB Kraftwerkstechnik, 1992, vol. 72, pp. 159-165.
Ghorishi et al., “Effects of Fly Ash Transition Metal Content and Flue Gas HCl/SO2 Ratio on Mercury Speciation in Waste Combustion,” in Environmental Engineering Science, Nov. 2005, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 221-231.
Ghorishi et al., “In-Flight Capture of Elemental Mercury by a Chlorine-Impregnated Activated Carbon,” presented at the Air & Waste Management Association's 94h Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Orlando, FL, Jun. 2001, pp. 1-14.
Ghorishi, “Fundamentals of Mercury Speciation and Control in Coal-Fired Boilers,” EAP Research and Development, EPA-600/R-98-014, Feb. 1998, pp. 1-26.
Granite et al., “Novel Sorbents for Mercury Removal from Flue Gas,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, Apr. 2000, 10 pages.
Granite et al., “Sorbents for Mercury Removal from Flue Gas,” U.S. Dept. of Energy, Report DOE/FETC/TR--98-01, Jan. 1998, 50 pages.
Granite et al. “The thief process for mercury removal from flue gas,” Journal of environmental management 84.4 (2007):628-634.
Griffin, “A New Theory of Dioxin Formation in Municipal Solid Waste Combustion,” Chemosphere, 1986, vol. 15, Nos. 9-12, pp. 1987-1990.
Griswell et al., “Progress Report on Mercury Control Retrofit at the Colstrip Power Station,” Power Plant Air Pollutant Control “MEGA” Symposium, Paper #91, Aug. 30-Sep. 2, 2010, pp. 1-23.
Gullet, B.K. et al, “The Effect of Sorbent Injection Technologies on Emissions of Coal-Based, Based, Metallic Air Toxics,” Proceedings of the 1993 S02 Control Symposium, vol. 2, U.S. EPA (Research Triangle Park, NC) Session 6A, Boston, MA, Aug. 24-27, 1993, 26 pages.
Gullett, B. et al., “Bench-Scale Sorption and Desorption of Mercury with Activated Carbon,” Presented at the 1993 International Conference on Municipal Waste Combustion, Williamsburg, VA, Mar. 30-Apr. 2, 1993, pp. 903-917.
Gullett, B. et al., “Removal of Illinois Coal-Based Volatile Tracy Mercury,” Final Technical Report, Sep. 1, 1996 through Aug. 31, 1997, 2 pages.
Guminski, “The Br—Hg (Bromine-Mercury) System,” Journal of Phase Equilibria, Dec. 2000, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 539-543.
Gutberlet et al., “The Influence of Induced Oxidation on the Operation of Wet FGD Systems,” Air Quality V Conference, Arlington, VA, Sep. 19-21, 2005, 15 pages.
Haiwen, “Basic Science Series of Database of Excellent Master's Degree Theses in China,” No. 07, Geochemistry of Iodine in Chinese Coal, Jul. 2008, pp. 29-32, 8 pages.
Hall et al., “Chemical Reactions of Mercury in Combustion Flue Gases,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1991, vol. 56, pp. 3-14.
Hein, K.R.G. et al., Research Report entitled, “Behavior of Mercury Emission from Coal Sewage Sludge Co-combustion Taking into Account the Gaseous Species,” Förderkennzeichen: PEF 398002, Apr. 2001 (English Abstract).
Henning et al., “Impregnated activated carbon for environmental protection,” Gas Separation & Purification, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Feb. 1993, vol. 7(4), pp. 235-240.
Ismo et al., “Formation of Aromatic Chlorinated Compounds Catalyzed by Copper and Iron,” Chemosphere, 1997, vol. 34(12), pp. 2649-2662.
Jeong et al. “Nox Removal by Selective Noncatalytic Reduction with Urea Solution in a Fluidized Bed Reactor,” Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Sep. 1999, vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 614-617.
Jozewicz et al., “Bench-Scale Scale Investigation of Mechanisms of Elemental Mercury Capture by Activated Carbon,” Presented at the Second International Conference on Managing Hazardous Air Pollutants, Washington, D.C., Jul. 13-15, 1993, pp. VII-85 through VII-99.
Julien et al., “The Effect of Halides on Emissions from Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion of Fossil Fuels,” Fuel, Nov. 1996, vol. 75(14), pp. 1655-1663.
Kaneko et al., “Pitting of stainless steel in bromide, chloride and bromide/chloride solutions,” Corrosion Science, 2000, vol. 42(1), pp. 67-78.
Kellie et al., “The Role of Coal Properties on Chemical and Physical Transformation on Mercury in Post Combustion,” presented at Air Quality IV Conference, Arlington, VA, Sep. 2003, pp. 1-14.
Kilgroe et al. “Fundamental Science and Engineering of Mercury Control in Coal-Fired Power Plants,” presented at Air Quality IV Conference, Arlington, VA, Sep. 2003, 15 pages.
Kilgroe et al., “Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Utility Boilers: Interim Report including Errata dated Mar. 21, 2002,” prepared by National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA Report EPA-600/R-01-109, Apr. 2002, 485 pages.
Kobayashi, “Japan EnviroChemicals, Ltd. Overview,” Feb. 3, 2002, 3 pages.
Kramlich, “The Homogeneous Forcing of Mercury Oxidation to Provide Low-Cost Capture,” Abstract, University of Washington, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mar. 25, 2004, available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/04/UCR-HBCU/abstracts/Kramlich.pdf, pp. 1-2.
Krishnan et al., “Mercury Control by Injection of Activated Carbon and Calcium-Based Based Sorbents,” Solid Waste Management: Thermal Treatment and Waste-to-Energy Technologies, U.S. EPA and AWMA, Washington, DC, Apr. 18-21, 1995, pp. 493-504.
Krishnan et al., “Mercury Control in Municipal Waste Combustors and Coal Fired Utilities,” Environmental Progress, ProQuest Science Journals, Spring 1997, vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 47-53.
Krishnan et al., “Sorption of Elemental Mercury by Activated Carbons,” Environmental Science and Technology, 1994, vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 1506-1512.
Lee et al., “Mercury Control Research: Effects of Fly Ash and Flue Gas Parameters on Mercury Speciation,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management Research Laboratory and ARCADIS, as early as 1998, Geraghy & Miller, Inc., pp. 221-238, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Lee et al., “Pilot-Scale Study of the Effect of Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalyst on Mercury Speciation in Illinois and Powder River Basin Coal Combustion Flue Gases,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., May 2006, vol. 56, pp. 643-649.
Lemieux et al., “Interactions Between Bromine and Chlorine in a Pilot-Scale Hazardous Waste Incinerator,” paper presented at 1996 International Incineration Conference, Savannah, GA, May 6-10, 1996, 14 pages.
Li et al., “Effect of Moisture on Adsorption of Elemental Mercury by Activated Carbons,” Report No. EPA/600/A-00/104, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development Nation Risk Management, Research Laboratory (10-65), 2000, pp. 1-Li to 13-Li.
Li et al., “Mercury Emissions Control in Coal Combustion Systems Using Postassium Iodide: Bench-Scale and Pilot-Scale Studies,” Energy & Fuels, Jan. 5, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 236-243.
Linak et al., “Toxic Metal Emissions from Incineration: Mechanisms and Control,” Progress in Energy & Combustion Science, 1993, vol. 19, pp. 145-185.
Lissianski et al., “Effect of Coal Blending on Mercury Removal,” presented at the Low Rank Fuels Conference, Billings, MT, Jun. 24-26, 2003, pp. 1-9.
Livengood et al., “Development of Mercury Control Techniques for Utility Boilers,” for Presentation at the 88th Air & Waste Management Association Annual Meeting & Exhibit, Jun. 18-23, 1995, pp. 1-14.
Livengood et al., “Enhanced Control of Mercury Emissions Through Modified Speciation,” for Presentation at the Air & Waste Management Association's 90th Meeting & Exhibition, Jun. 8-13, 1997, 14 pages.
Livengood et al., “Investigation of Modified Speciation for Enhanced Control of Mercury,” Argonne National Laboratory, 1998, available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/97/97ps/ps_pdf/PS2B-9.pdf, pp. 1-15.
Luijk et al., “The Role of Bromine in the De Novo Synthesis in a Model Fly Ash System,” Chemosphere, 1994, vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 1299-1309.
Matai et al., “Iodine Deficiency Disease-Local Goiter and Local Cretinism,” 2nd Edition, People's Medical Publishing House, Jun. 1993, pp. 46-49, 9 pages.
Martel, K., “Brennstoff-und lastspezifische Untersuchungen zum Verhalten von Schwermetallen in Kohlenstaubfeuerungen [Fuel and load specific studies on the behavior of heavy metals in coal firing systems],” Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Apr. 2000, pp. 1-240.
Mccoy et al., “Full-Scale Mercury Sorbent Injection Testing at DTE Energy's St. Clair Station,” Paper #97, DTE Energy, as early as 2004, pp. 1-9.
Mccoy, “Urea's Unlikely Role: Emissions Reduction is new application for chemical best known as a fertilizer,” Chemical and Engineering News, Jun. 6, 2011, vol. 89, No. 23, p. 32.
Meij et al., “The Fate and Behavior of Mercury in Coal-Fired Power Plants,” J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., Aug. 2002, vol. 52, pp. 912-917.
Metals Handbook, 9th Edition, Corrosion, vol. 13, ASM International, 1987, pp. 997-998, 6 pages.
Mills Jr., “Techline: Meeting Mercury Standards,” as early as Jun. 18, 2001, available at http://www.netl.doe/publications/press/2001/tl_mercuryel2.html, printed on Feb. 5, 2002, pp. 1-3.
Moberg et al., “Migration of Trace Elements During Flue Gas Desulfurization,” Report No. KHM-TR-28, Jun. 1982 (abstract only).
Niksa et al., “Predicting Mercury Speciation in Coal-Derived Flue Gases,” presented at the 2003 Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium, Washington, D.C., May 2003, pp. 1-14.
Oberacker et al., “Incinerating the Pesticide Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)—A field-Scale Trail Burn Evaluation of Environmental Performance,” Report EPA /600/D-88/198, Oct. 1988, pp. 1-11.
Olson et al., “An Improved Model for Flue Gas-Mercury Interactions on Activated Carbons,” presented at Mega Symposium May 21, 2003, Energy & Environmental Research Center publication, Paper # 142, pp. 1-8.
Olson et al., “Oxidation Kinetics and the Model for Mercury Capture on Carbon in Flue Gas,” presented at Air Quality V Conference, Sep. 21, 2005, pp. 1-7.
Oppenheimer et al., “Thermische Entsorgung von Produktionsabfällen,” Entsorgungs-Praxis, 2000, vol. 6, pp. 29-33.
Pasic et al., “Membrane Electrostatic Precipitation, Center for Advanced Materials Processing,” Ohio Coal Research Center Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ohio University, on or before 2001, pp. 1-Bayless to10-Bayless.
Paulik et al., “Examination of the Decomposition of CaBr2 with the Method of Simultaneous TG, DTG, DTA and EGA,” Journal of Thermal Analysis, vol. 15, 1979, 4 pages.
Pavlish et al., “Status Review of Mercury Control Options for Coal-Fired Power Plants,” Fuel Processing Technology, Aug. 2003, vol. 82, pp. 89-165.
Richardson et al., “Chemical Addition for Mercury Control in Flue Gas Derived from Western Coals,” presented at the 2003 Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium, Washington D.C., May 2003, Paper #63, pp. 1-16.
Rodriguez et al., “Iodine Room Temperature Sorbents for Mercury Capture in Combustion Exhausts,” 2001, 14 pages.
Samaras et al., “PCDD/F Prevention by Novel Inhibitors: Addition of Inorganic S- and N-Compounds in the Fuel before Combustion,” Environmental Science and Technology, 2000, vol. 34, No. 24, pp. 5092-5096.
Sarkar et al., “Adsorption of Mercury(II) by Kaolinite,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1999, vol. 64(6), pp. 1968-1975, abstract only, 1 page.
Schmidt et al., “Innovative Feedback Control System for Chemical Dosing to Control Treatment Plant Odors,” Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, WEFTEC 2000: Session 11-Session 20, pp. 166-175 (Abstract), 2 pages.
Schüetze et al., “Redox potential and co-removal of mercury in wet FGD scrubbers,” Air Quality VIII Conference, Crystal City, VA, Oct. 24-27, 2011, 1 page.
Schüetze et al., “Strategies for enhanced co-removal of mercury in wet FGD-scrubbers—process control and additives,” Flue Gas Cleaning, Helsinki, Finland, May 26, 2011, 25 pages.
Senior et al., “Gas-Phase Transformations of Mercury in Coal-Fired Power Plants,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 63, 2000, pp. 197-213.
Senior, “Behavior of Mercury in Air Pollution Control Devices on Coal-Fired Utility Boilers,” Power Production in the 21st Century: Impacts of Fuel Quality and Operations, Engineering Foundation Conference, Snowbird, UT, Oct. 28-Nov. 2, 2001, 17 pages.
Serre et al., “Evaluation of the Impact of Chlorine on Mercury Oxidation in a Pilot-Scale Coal Combustor—the Effect of Coal Blending,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Sep. 2009, 21 pages.
Sjostrom et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of Mercury Control at Great River Energy's Stanton Generating Station Using Injected Sorbents and a Spray Dryer/Baghouse,” to be presented at Air Quality III Conference, Session A3b, 2002, 14 pages.
Sjostrom et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of Mercury Control by Injecting Activated Carbon Upstream of a Spray Dryer and Fabric Filter,” Presented at the 2004 combined power plant air pollutant control mega symposium, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2004, 18 pages.
Sjostrom et al., “Long-Term Carbon Injection Field Test for >90% Mercury Removal for a PRB Unit with a Spray Dryer and Fabric Filter,” ADA-ES, Inc. Final Scientific/Technical Report, Apr. 2009, 82 pages.
Sjostrom, “Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control,” ADA-ES, Inc. Topical Report for Basin Electric Power Cooperative's Laramie River Station, Jan. 16, 2006, 49 pages.
Sjostrom, “Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control,” Topical Report for Sunflower Electric's Holcomb Station, U.S. DOE Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26-03NT41986, Topical Report No. 41986R07, Jun. 28, 2005, 85 pages.
Sliger et al., “Towards the Development of a Chemical Kinetic Model for the Homogeneous Oxidation of Mercury by Chlorine Species,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 65-66, 2000, pp. 423-438.
Speight, ed., The Chemistry and Technology of Coal, CRC Press, 1994, pp. 152-155.
Starns et al., “Full-Scale Evaluation of Toxecon II™ on a Lignite-Fired Boiler” presented at US EPA/DOE/EPRI Combiner Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Symposium: The Mega Symposium, Washington, DC, Aug. 30-Sep. 2, 2004, 14 pages.
Staudt et al., “Control Technologies to Reduce Conventional and Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal-Fired Power Plants,” prepared for Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), Mar. 31, 2011, retrieved from www.nescaum.org/.../coal-control-technology-nescaum-report-20110330.pdf, 36 pages.
Sudhoff, “Anticipated Benefits of the Toxecon Retrofit for Mercury and Multi-Pollutant Control Technology,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, Nov. 19, 2003, available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/cctc/pubs/Benefits_TOXECON_111903.pdf, pp. 1-20.
Suzuki et al., “Instrumental neutron activation analysis for coal,” Bunseki Kagaku, vol. 34, No. 5, 1985, pp. 217-223 (with English abstract).
Teller et al., “Mercury Removal from Incineration Flue Gas,” Air and Water Technologies Co., for presentation at the 84th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Vancouver, British Columbia, Jun. 16-21, 1991, 10 pages.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Study of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units,” Report to Congress, vol. 1-2, EPA-453/R-98-004a&b, Feb. 1998, pp. 1-165.
Urabe et al., “Experimental Studies on Hg Vapor Removal Using Corona Discharge for Refuse Incinerator,” Chemical Abstracts, Oct. 1997, vol. 109, 37 pages (includes translation).
Urano, S., “Studies on Bleaching Powder, VII. The Decomposition of Calcium Hypochlorite by Heat in the Presence of Calcium Chloride,” Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry of Japan, vol. 31, 1928, pp. 46-52 (no translation).
Verhulst et al., “Thermodynamic Behavior of Metal Chlorides and Sulfates under the Conditions of Incineration Furnaces,” Environmental Science & Technology, 1996, vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 50-56.
Vidic et al., “Uptake of Elemental Mercury Vapors by Activated Carbons,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 1996, vol. 46, pp. 241-250.
Vidic et al., “Vapor-phase elemental mercury adsorption by activated carbon impregnated with chloride and cheltinq agents,” Carbon, 2001, vol. 39, pp. 3-14.
Vosteen et al., Mercury Sorption and Mercury Oxidation by Chlorine and Bromine at SCR DeNOx Catalyst (Part A: Oxidation), 9th Annual EPA, DOE, EPRI, EEI Conference on Clean Air, Mercy Global Warming & Renewable Energy, Tucson, AZ, Jan. 24, 2005, 38 pages.
Vosteen et al, “Mercury-Related Chemistry in Waste Incineration and Power Generation Flue Gases,” Sep. 2003, Air Quality IV, pp. 1-8.
Vosteen et al., “Bromine Enhanced Mercury Abatement from Combustion Flue Gases—Recent Industrial Applications and Laboratory Research,” VGB PowerTech, International Journal for Electricity and Heat Generation, 2006, vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 70-75.
Vosteen et al., “Bromine Enhanced Mercury Abatement from Combustion Flue Gases—Recent Industrial Applications and Laboratory Research,” VGB PowerTech, 2nd International Experts' Workshop on Mercury Emissions from Coal (MEC2), May 24 & 25, 2005, 8 pages.
Weber et al., “The Role of Copper(II) Chloride in the Formation of Organic Chlorine in Fly Ash,” Chemosphere, 2001, vol. 42, pp. 479-582.
White et al., “Field Test of Carbon Injection for Mercury Control at Camden County Municipal Waste Combustor,” EPA-600/R-93-181 (NTIS PB94-101540), Sep. 1993, pp. 1-11.
Withum et al., “Characterization of Coal Combustion By-Products for the Re-Evolution of Mercury into Ecosystems,” Consol Energy Inc., Research and Development, Mar. 2005, 48 pages.
Working project report for period Oct. 1, 1999 to Sep. 30, 2001 from Institut fur Verhrenstechnik und Dampfkesselwessen (IVD), Universitat Stuttgart, dated Mar. 28, 2002, pp. 14-38.
Zevenhoven et al., “Control of Pollutants in flue gases and fuel gases,” Trace Elements, Alkali Metals, 2001, 32 pages.
Zygarlicke et al., “Flue gas interactions of mercury, chlorine, and ash during coal combustion,” Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems, Clearwater, Florida, Mar. 9-13, 1998, pp. 517-526 (ISBN 0-03206602302).
Protest for Canadian Patent Application No. 2788820, dated Feb. 26, 2018, 6 pages.
Protest for Canadian Application No. 2788820, dated Nov. 6, 2018, 10 pages.
Notice of Protest for Canadian Application No. 2793326, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 16 pages.
Notice of Protest for Canadian Application No. 2793326, dated Jul. 7, 2017, 6 pages.
Notice of Protest for Canadian Application No. 2793326, dated Apr. 19, 2018, 17 pages.
Notice of Protest for Canadian Application No. 2793326, dated Feb. 14, 2019, 12 pages.
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,441, dated Jan. 23, 2015 7 pages Restriction Requirement.
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,441, dated Jul. 1, 2015 7 pages Restriction Requirement.
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,441, dated Sep. 15, 2015 8 pages.
Final Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,441, dated Mar. 24, 2016 17 pages.
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,441, dated Sep. 29, 2016 16 pages.
Final Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,441, dated Jun. 15, 2017 23 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/964,441, dated Mar. 22, 2018 10 pages.
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,522, dated Jun. 27, 2019 10 pages.
Final Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,522, dated Jan. 9, 2020 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,522, dated Apr. 1, 2020 8 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200332213 A1 Oct 2020 US
Provisional Applications (4)
Number Date Country
61792827 Mar 2013 US
61724634 Nov 2012 US
61704290 Sep 2012 US
61682040 Aug 2012 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13964441 Aug 2013 US
Child 15941522 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15941522 Mar 2018 US
Child 16917270 US