The present invention relates generally to integrated circuits (ICs), and more particularly, to generating static logic level outputs in ICs.
In general, static logic level circuits are circuits that provide one or more constant logic outputs, including static logic one and static logic zero. These constant logic outputs are also known as static logic level outputs. Static logic level outputs are typically used in ICs as tie-offs for input terminals of logic gates not driven by any other driving device or driving signal, except the static logic level outputs. Note that some IC designers refer to these input terminals as “unused” input terminals. Furthermore, in some IC designs, gates that are specified to be coupled to a logic one or a logic zero may be coupled to the corresponding static logic level output.
In general, an indirect connection (also known as a “soft” connection) to a static logic one or a static logic zero is preferred because a direct connection of a gate to a power supply or ground may cause Electro-Static Discharge (ESD) failures in the IC. This is especially serious with some advanced technologies because the devices may have relatively thin gate oxide, and hence, are more susceptible to ESD.
Four conventional circuits for providing a static logic one or a static logic zero are shown in
The circuits 201 and 202 shown in
One disadvantage of the conventional circuits 101 and 102 is that the intermediate nodes, Int, may not be at the full rail logic level, and hence, the voltages at the intermediate nodes may not drive the transistors 120 and 122 as strongly as if the intermediate nodes were at the full rail logic level. Consequently, the transistors 120 and 122 may be at the edge of “cutoff.”
Another disadvantage of the conventional circuits 101 and 102 is their susceptibility to crosstalk. Crosstalk generally refers to noise events that may cause the static logic level output to switch to an undesired logic state for some period of time during the noise events. The circuits 101 and 102 rely on a high impedance node that is not at the full power supply rail voltage (e.g., the intermediate node, Int) to drive the gate of a transistor. This is problematic when the transistor threshold voltage (Vt) becomes large relative to the power supply. If the Vt of the transistors 120 and 122 is too large relative to the power supply, then the voltage at the intermediate node, Int, may not be strong enough to activate the transistors 120 and 122 sufficiently to achieve a good drive strength in the static logic level outputs. This condition, along with the high-impedance nature of the intermediate node, leads to crosstalk susceptibility.
A disadvantage of the second type of conventional circuits 201 and 202 in
The present invention will be understood more fully from the detailed description that follows and from the accompanying drawings, which however, should not be taken to limit the appended claims to the specific embodiments shown, but are for explanation and understanding only.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures, and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment. The term “to couple” as used herein may include both to directly couple and to indirectly couple through one or more intervening components.
In one embodiment, a first circuit is driven by a second circuit to generate a static logic level output, which may include a static logic zero or a static logic one. The second circuit may include a latch that generates two opposite outputs, which are input to the first circuit to cause the first circuit to generate a static logic level output. Alternatively, the second circuit may include a feedback device to provide a feedback signal from an output of the first circuit to an input of the first circuit. A voltage at an intermediate node of the first circuit may be pulled up in response to the feedback signal to reduce the impedance at the intermediate node. In some embodiments, the voltage at the intermediate node drives a transistor in the first circuit to generate a static logic level output.
In one embodiment, the state of the latch 310 is indeterminate at power up. However, the latch 310 will resolve its state in one direction or the other. Once the latch 310 resolves its state, no matter which logic state the latch 310 resolves to, the two outputs of the latch 310 oppose each other. The two outputs of the latch 310, including a logic one and a logic zero, are input to the NOR gate 330, to cause the NOR gate 330 to generate a static logic zero.
For example, assume that node “A” in
In one embodiment, the state of the latch 320 is indeterminate at power up. However, the latch 320 will resolve its state in one direction or the other. Once the latch 320 resolves its state, no matter which logic state the latch 320 resolves to, the two outputs of the latch 320 oppose each other. The two outputs of the latch 320, including a logic one and a logic zero, are input to the NAND gate 332, to cause the NAND gate 332 to generate a static logic one.
For example, assume that node “A” in
Alternatively, instead of separately implementing the circuits 301 and 302 in
As discussed above with reference to
As discussed above with reference to
Alternatively, instead of separately implementing the circuits 401 and 402 in
Although described with reference to some exemplary embodiments, one should appreciate that other alternative embodiments of the circuit of the present invention are possible. For example, in each of the embodiments described above, both static logic zero and static logic one may be generated from a single circuit by including additional devices. In the case of a circuit that generates a static logic zero (e.g., circuit 301 in
In one embodiment, coupling the drain of the NMOS transistor 530 to the gate of the first pMOS transistor 510 allows the first pMOS transistor 510 to provide a positive feedback to the NMOS transistor 530. Furthermore, the diode-connected pMOS 520 may pull an intermediate node 540 up above the logic zero level. Thus, the impedance of the intermediate node 540 may be less than the impedance of the intermediate node in the conventional circuits shown in
Moreover, the positive feedback arrangement provides several advantages over some conventional static logic level circuits. One advantage is that the positive feedback arrangement eliminates high-impedance non-CMOS level signals in the circuit 501, and thus, reduces the detrimental effects of crosstalk. Furthermore, the circuit 501 generates both a static logic zero and a static logic one using fewer devices compared with some conventional circuits. Moreover, the circuit 501 reduces the likelihood of Electro-Static Discharge (ESD) by providing a static logic level output to the input terminals of logic gates not driven by any other driving device or driving signal without directly coupling such input terminals to either the ground or the power supply.
In one embodiment, the first nMOS transistor 512 provides a positive feedback to the pMOS transistor 532. Furthermore, the diode-connected NMOS 522 may pull an intermediate node 542 below the logic one level. Advantages similar to those discussed above with respect to
As illustrated by the exemplary embodiments described above, using either a latch or a feedback mechanism to generate static logic zero and/or static logic one may eliminate the high-impedance and non-CMOS level nodes, which are common in many conventional static logic level circuits. The elimination of the high-impedance node from the static logic level circuits reduces the likelihood of crosstalk. Furthermore, using either a latch or a feedback mechanism may not incur a large area penalty as using a resistor does in some conventional static logic level circuits.
The technique described above may be very valuable going forward once technology advances to the point where coupling a gate directly to a power supply or ground causes ESD failures (e.g., at about the 130 nm node). This is especially problematic with technologies which provides high device threshold voltages (Vt) relative to the power supply value. Unlike the diode connection in some conventional static logic level circuits, which requires the Field Effect Transistor (FET) device Vt to be low enough, the intermediate node in some embodiments of the present invention is always at a full logic zero or logic one level.
In one embodiment, processing logic resolves a state of a latch in a first circuit to provide a first and a second output signals that are opposite to each other (processing block 610). The first and the second output signals are input to a second circuit to activate at least one of a set of loads in the second circuit (processing block 612). Processing logic performs a NOR or a NAND operation on the first and the second output signals from the latch to generate a static logic zero or a static logic one, respectively (processing block 614). Then processing logic may drive an input terminal of a logic gate using the static logic zero or the static logic one generated (processing block 616). The input terminal of the logic gate may not be driven by any other driving devices. In some embodiments, the logic gate resides on a common IC substrate with the first and the second circuits.
Furthermore, processing logic may use the static logic one or static logic zero to drive an nMOS transistor or a pMOS transistor, respectively, in order to further generate a static logic zero or a static logic one, respectively. Alternatively, processing logic may use the static logic one or static logic zero to drive an inverter to further generate the opposite static logic level output.
Processing logic resolves a state of a latch in a first circuit to provide a first and a second output signals that are opposite to each other (processing block 620). The first and the second output signals are input to a second circuit to activate at least one of a set of loads in the second circuit (processing block 622). Processing logic drives a gate of a first transistor in the second circuit with the first output signal from the latch (processing block 624). Processing logic also drives a gate of a second transistor in the second circuit with the second output signal from the latch (processing block 626). Processing logic generates a static logic level output using one of the first and the second transistors in response to the first and the second output signals from the latch (processing block 628). In some embodiments, processing logic drives an input terminal of a logic gate using the static logic level output generated (processing block 629). The input terminal of the logic gate may not be driven by any other driving devices. In some embodiments, the logic gate resides on a common integrated circuit substrate with the first and the second circuit.
Furthermore, processing logic may use the static logic one or the static logic zero to drive an nMOS transistor or a pMOS transistor, respectively, in order to further generate a static logic zero or a static logic one, respectively. Alternatively, processing logic may use the static logic one or static logic zero to drive an inverter to further generate the opposite static logic level output.
Processing logic drives a first circuit using a second circuit, which has a feedback device (processing block 630). Processing logic provides a feedback signal from an output of the first circuit to an input of the first circuit using the feedback device (processing block 632). Processing logic may pull up a voltage at an intermediate node of the first circuit in response to the feedback signal to reduce the impedance at the intermediate node (processing block 634). Processing logic may generate a static logic one and/or a static logic zero using the first circuit in response to the second circuit (processing block 636). Then processing logic may drive an input terminal of a logic gate using the static logic zero or the static logic one generated (processing block 638). The input terminal of the logic gate may not be driven by any other driving devices. In some embodiments, the logic gate resides on a common integrated circuit substrate with the first and the second circuit.
Note that any or all of the components of the networked system 700 and associated hardware may be used in various embodiments of the present invention. However, it can be appreciated that other configurations of the networked system 700 may include additional or fewer components than those illustrated in
The foregoing discussion merely describes some exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion, the accompanying drawings, and the claims that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/530,552, filed on Dec. 17, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4806786 | Valentine | Feb 1989 | A |
5391941 | Landry | Feb 1995 | A |
5490115 | Shah et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5835970 | Landry et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5903174 | Landry et al. | May 1999 | A |
5933032 | Shah et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943241 | Nichols et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5986490 | Hwang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6028448 | Landry | Feb 2000 | A |
6043684 | Landry | Mar 2000 | A |
6088289 | Landry et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119249 | Landry | Sep 2000 | A |
6134181 | Landry | Oct 2000 | A |
6172519 | Chiang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6208186 | Nair | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222393 | Shah et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6298005 | Landry | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333891 | Landry et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6411140 | Landry | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6466505 | Landry | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486712 | Landry et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507932 | Landry et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515884 | Sywyk et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549050 | Meyers et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563437 | Landry et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611935 | Landry | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6647457 | Sywyk et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657472 | Raza et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697275 | Sywyk et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6751755 | Sywyk et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6975151 | Akiyoshi | Dec 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60530552 | Dec 2003 | US |