This invention relates generally to a bidirectional cable television (“CATV”) network that provides services to a user, and more specifically, it relates to reducing noise ingress resulting from electrical/electromagnetic signals entering the CATV network through improperly terminated tap and splitter ports.
The CATV industry has evolved into a provider of many services. These services not only include traditional analog television programming, but also data services that include, digital television programming, internet services, home security services, voice over internet (VOIP) services, pay-per-view monitoring/billing, and others yet to be discovered. All of these services are provided by transferring alternating electrical current signals (“signals”) to and from a user's facility, such as a home or business.
The CATV signals are delivered to these users from a head end along feeder cables. A head end is a facility for processing and distributing signals over a CATV network. Normally, the head end facility houses electronic equipment used to receive and re-transmit video and other signals over the local cable infrastructure. The feeder cables extend from the head end and branch off to the user's facility at a tap having one or more ports. A drop cable, which is a single coaxial cable, is then passed from one of these ports to a user subsystem on or in the user's facility.
At a time when televisions were considered a luxury and when the cable television industry only provided television services, the drop cable may have run directly into one room of the facility to provide signals to one television. In other words, there may have been no splitters between the user tap and the television. Due to the proliferation of televisions and other user devices that utilize the cable television cables, most user facilities now have at least one splitter that allows the signals to pass from the single drop cable into two or more distribution cables, each distribution cable having its own port on the splitter. Additional splitters may be placed on any of these distribution cables for the addition of more distribution cables. Because even the most technologically advanced homes rarely have a television or other user device for each of these distribution cables and their respective splitter ports, many of these distribution cables and unconnected splitter ports, go unused and unterminated to gather undesirable signals present throughout the home. The term “unterminated port” may be used interchangeably for an unused/unterminated tap port, for an unused/unterminated user port physically located on a splitter, for an unused/unterminated end connector, and for a splitter port that is connected to a distribution cable, which is also unused and not connected to a user device. A distribution cable connected to an unused wall jack located in a separate room of a facility is an example of a distribution cable with an unused/unterminated end connector. This wall jack is an end connector that is essentially an extension of the user port on the splitter.
Each of these unterminated ports can allow electrical/electromagnetic signals to enter the CATV network as ingress noise. The CATV industry has been plagued with ingress noise from each user's facility. Any electrical/electromagnetic signals present in the facility can be passed into any unterminated ports, and hence, the CATV network. These electrical/electromagnetic signals can be inadvertently generated by traditional electrical devices with alternating electrical currents, such as garbage disposals, welders, blower motors, etc. These electrical/electromagnetic signals can also include intentionally generated radio signals transmitted by CB radios, cell phones, personal communicators, wireless telephones, wireless baby monitors, etc. While some of these electrical/electromagnetic signals might be desirable for an intended purpose, none of these signals are desirable if/when they are introduced into the CATV network as ingress noise.
For the purpose of clarity, the term “undesirable signals” is used herein to describe any electrical/electromagnetic signals that are not desired within the CATV network. Thus, undesirable signals can include any signals in the CATV network that are not intentionally provided therein. Similarly, the term “ingress noise” is used herein to describe any undesirable signals present in the CATV network that interfere with desired signals within the CATV network. The term “desired signals” is used herein to describe those signals intended to be present within the CATV network. “Noise ingress” is used to describe the act of the ingress noise entering the CATV network and interfering with desired signals.
As mentioned above, the desired signals are delivered to and are received from the user's facility as desired alternating electrical current signals. Ingress noise, without processing or filtering, for example, interacts with the desired signals to create a resulting signal that may be unfit for use, or unusable, by the user.
Typically, the coaxial cable used in a CATV network is designed to contain the desired signals and protect them from undesirable signals that could cause ingress noise. It accomplishes this goal using an electromagnetic shield that can include a thin, conductive foil, and/or braided conductive metal that surrounds the primary conductor. While the coaxial cable does not protect the desired signals perfectly, on a practical level it generally succeeds.
On the other hand, unterminated ports can often leave the CATV network exposed to ingress noise. A port, like a coaxial cable, has a center conductor and a shielding element. Such ports attach to, or are built into, one end of a shielded signal path, such as a coaxial cable, a tap, or a splitter. Any time these conductors in such ports exist in an unprotected state, the conductors and/or the ports can be exposed to the undesirable signals that can become ingress noise that alters the desired signal properties.
When a port built into a splitter is properly connected to a coaxial cable, and ultimately a user device (e.g., television, television tuner, modem, VOIP server, etc.), the splitter, the connectors, the coaxial cables, and/or the end device increase the desired signals relative to the undesirable signals by attenuating the undesirable signals at the paths of entry into the CATV network. However, as discussed above, when such a port is unterminated it is also unshielded, so the CATV network is exposed to undesirable signals at the port that can cause noise ingress. Similarly, if a port is connected, but connected improperly, the CATV network may also be exposed to undesirable signals. The term “unterminated port” will be used herein to include those ports that are not connected to a user device or are improperly connected to a user device.
As can be imagined, ingress noise can pose a significant and costly problem for the cable industry. When undesirable signals enter the CATV network as ingress noise at an unterminated port, not only are the performance of the tap or splitter affected, but ingress noise can enter and disrupt larger portions of the CATV network. In particular, ingress noise flowing into the CATV network from the user's facility in this manner can accumulate and merge with upstream data created by the user's Internet uploads and created by voice transmissions associated with VOIP, etc., to increase the overall noise level, to decrease the overall ratio of desired signals-to-overall noise, and be transmitted to a head end of the CATV network.
The increased noise levels and decreased signal-to-noise ratios caused by the ingress noise can cause degradation of the transmission quality, and in some cases, it can cause the CATV network to fail in transmission. The ingress noise can also cause problems with downstream signals, such as those for analog television, for instance, by altering electrical signals in a manner that causes picture degradation. Failure of digital signals, such as internet, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) and digital television, can take the form of delays in transmission of internet data (e.g., upload or download), or temporary losses of picture. These failures occur when data packets are received at user devices with errors, causing the data packets to be resent, further causing more traffic and congestion in the CATV network. As can be imagined, diagnosing any of these problems is expensive, and fixing the problems is also expensive once they are identified.
Presently, a solution for reducing ingress noise at ports uses a mating “terminating” connector that is physically attached to an otherwise unterminated port. Attaching the terminating connector to the unterminated port completes a circuit that allows signals to pass. The terminating connector causes a 75 Ohm resistance to be mechanically inserted between the center conductor of a port and a ground. In this way, when a port is disconnected from another connector, the signal is terminated to ground at the port, closing an opportunity for noise ingress. However, problems with this setup can arise. For instance, a port can be connected to a mating coaxial cable so the signal is allowed to flow through it, with no user device attached at the end of the coaxial cable. In this case, undesirable signals can ingress into the CATV network at the unterminated end of the coaxial cable and pass through the port. Alternatively, where a terminating connector is connected improperly (e.g., not fully attached, attached incorrectly, etc.), noise can ingress and a faulty signal can pass.
It would be advantageous to reduce or preventingress noise by appropriately terminating the port when it is improperly connected as well as when it is unconnected.
A self-terminating signal path through a port is provided to interrupt and terminate (e.g., automatically) the signal path to a prescribed signal level connection point when the signal path is found to be unterminated.
In one embodiment of the invention, an apparatus for reducing noise ingress is provided. The apparatus comprises at least one signal path extending from a supplier-side port through a user-side port, a signal source coupled to each of the signal paths, and at least one signal circuit arranged in one of the interruptible signal paths. Each interruptible signal path comprises a conductor and a prescribed signal level connection point (e.g. a ground). The signal source is arranged to provide a signal to the conductor. Each signal circuit is configured to determine when the interruptible signal path is unterminated, and to interrupt and terminate the interruptible signal path to the prescribed signal level connection point when the interruptible signal path is determined by the signal circuit to be unterminated.
In another embodiment, a signal splitter is provided to reduce noise ingress. The signal splitter comprises an interruptible signal path, a signal detector, a signal switching device arranged on a first branch of the one or more signal branches, and a coupler circuit. The interruptible signal path extends from a supplier-side port through an output of a user-side port. The interruptible signal path also comprises one or more signal branches. The signal detector detects a signal level on the interruptible signal path at the user-side port. The signal switching device selectively interrupts the first branch of the interruptible signal path. The coupler circuit performs AC coupling between the signal detector and the signal switching device. The signal detector, the coupler circuit, and the signal switching device connect in series to at least the first branch of the one or more signal branches in the interruptible signal path.
In yet another embodiment, a method is presented to terminate a port in order to reduce or preventingress noise. A signal is applied to a conductor in at least one interruptible signal path extending through a user-side port. Each interruptible signal path has one or more signal branches. It is determined whether each of the interruptible signal paths is terminated on a user side of a reference point. Then, each interruptible signal path is interrupted and terminated at a termination point when the interruptible signal paths are unterminated on the user side of the reference point.
In other embodiments, the method and apparatus operate in various combinations to accommodate multiple signal paths having multiple signal branches.
Embodiments of methods and apparatus according to the invention are described in the context of a CATV network used to supply a residential or other user facility. However, the general principles and apparatus may be extended to other types of architectures and networks, whether broadband, narrowband, or otherwise.
It will also be appreciated that while described generally in the context of a residential or home domain, the present invention may be readily adapted to other types of environments (e.g., commercial/enterprise, government/military, etc.) as well.
In the detailed description that follows, identical components have been given the same reference numerals, and in order to clearly and concisely illustrate embodiments according to the present invention, certain features may be shown in schematic form.
Referring to the simple schematic of
As shown in the exemplary CATV network (e.g., subsystems 10, 20) of
Referring to
The termination circuit 150 comprises a signal switching device 41, a terminating signal path 42, and a ground 51. The signal switching device 41 may be any one of the known analog or digital single pole, double throw (SPDT) switches. At each of user-side ports 40, 50, 60, and 70, the signal switching device 41 is arranged in the respective signal branch 108, 110, 112, 114. The signal switching device 41 has a closed state, in which the signal switching device 41 completes the circuit to pass signals to the output 47, and an opened state, in which it interrupts the respective signal branch 108, 110, 112, 114 and terminates the respective signal path 102/104/108, 102/104/110, 102/106/112, 102/106/114 by completing the terminating signal path 42 to ground 51. In one embodiment, a resistance of the terminating signal path 42 is approximately 75 ohms to match the characteristic impedance of the CATV system. This resistance in the terminating signal path 42 can be adjusted as appropriate depending on the characteristic impedance of the particular system, as one skilled in the art would recognize. Further, the terminating signal path 42 is shown coupled to the ground 51 in
The sensor circuit 160 comprises a blocking capacitor 43, a resistor R1, and a signal comparison device 46, such as but not limited to a simple comparator, a dedicated voltage comparator chip, a microprocessor, or other processor, each of which is capable of comparing two signal characteristics (e.g., voltage or current), and switching its output to indicate which signal characteristic is larger. The blocking capacitor 43 is arranged in the signal branch 108, 110, 112, 114 before the output 47, to block the passage of a direct electrical current I (which will be discussed more fully below) to the supplier-side port 101. A first input of the signal comparison device 46 is connected to the signal branch 108, 110, 112, 114 between the output 47 and the blocking capacitor 43 by the resistor R1 and to a signal source, such as a voltage source 53, as illustrated. A second input of the signal comparison device 46 is connected to a source providing a reference signal characteristic, such as a voltage Vref. The voltage Vref is compared to a voltage Vmeas to operate the signal switching device 41, as will be described more fully below. The voltage Vmeas is measured at the first input to the signal comparison device 46, and is representative of the signal on the interruptible signal path 102/104/108, 102/104/110, 102/106/112, 102/106/114. At user-side ports 40 and 60, user devices 48, such as, but not limited to a television set, a television receiver/tuner, and a modem, are connected to the output 47. All the user-side ports 40, 50, 60, and 70 are connected to the voltage divider input voltage source 53 that can be connected through an optional common current limiting resistor R2. In one embodiment, a power supply (e.g., voltage source or current source) such as but not limited to the voltage source 53 can be part of or integral to the splitters 22, 24 (e.g., upon manufacture or assembly). In an alternative embodiment, the power supply (e.g., voltage source or current source) such as but not limited to the voltage source 53 can be attached or electrically coupled to the splitters 22, 24 (e.g., upon installation).
The sensor circuit 160 senses, or determines, when the user device 48 is properly connected, and the termination circuit 150 either passes signals through the signal branch 108, 110, 112, 114 and the output 47, or else directs signals to ground 51 accordingly, in response to the sensor circuit 160. As shown in
If the user device 48 is not connected, such as at the user-side ports 50 and 70 shown in
When in the opened state, the signal switching device 41 can reset to the closed state. Interrupting the power supplied from the voltage source 53 is one way to reset the signal switching device 41 to the closed state. For instance, the voltage source can be configured to reset or interrupt on a periodic basis—intermittently, repeatedly, aperiodically, (e.g., on a scale of seconds, minutes, or hours)—or in response to a sensed condition (or a user action). Other ways to interrupt the voltage source and/or reset are conceived or possible, and are considered within the scope of the invention. For instance, the signal switching device 41 might be configured to reset periodically. Other circuit components might also be added to accomplish resetting the signal switching device 41 appropriately, the addition of which would be understood by one skilled in the art.
While
It will also be appreciated that the circuit of
An embodiment of a method of controlling a signal path through a port according to the invention will now be described. The method embodiment shown in
As shown in
Other methods of determining whether the user-side port 40 is terminated on the user side of the reference point 61, or through its output 47, are within the scope of the invention, such as, but not limited to comparing signal characteristics other than voltage with a reference value. For instance, resistance can be measured and compared against a reference resistance value in order to determine if the user-side port 40 is terminated. Similarly, current of a signal in the signal branch 108, 110, 112, 114, or in a signal circuit 150/160 connected to the signal branch 108, 110, 112, 114, can be measured and compared against a reference current value in order to determine if the user-side port 40 is terminated. For example, comparing the voltage Vmeas with the voltage Vref at the signal comparison device 46 can be considered related to or equivalent to measuring and comparing current at, for instance, the output 47. However, other circuit arrangements can measure and compare signal characteristics in order to determine whether user-side port 40 is terminated as well.
When it is determined that the signal path is terminated downstream of the user-side port, decision box 320 passes control to step 330. When it is determined that the signal path is not terminated downstream of the user-side port, decision box 320 passes control to step 340.
Still referencing user-side port 40 of
At the end of steps 330 and 340, the process repeats starting with step 300. When the signal switching device 41 remains closed so the signals pass through the signal path 102/104/108 to the user side of the termination point 62 (e.g., through the output 47), according to step 330, the method of terminating the signal path 102/104/108 through the user-side port 40 continually loops with the possibility the user device 48 is disconnected so the user-side port 40 will become unterminated, and then subsequently terminated by the termination circuit 150. When the signal switching device 41 is set to the opened state to interrupt and terminate the signal path by completing the signal path to ground 51, according to step 340, looping the method results in the signal switching device 41 remaining set in the opened state because when the user-side port 40 is terminated at the termination point 62 in the user-side port 40, and not to the user side of the reference point 61, as through the output 47, the answer to decision box 320 is “no”. The signal path 102/104/108 is interrupted and terminated to ground, according to step 340.
Alternatively however, in one embodiment, the signal switching device 41 can reset, as for example, described above. In that case, looping the method can result in the signal switching device 41 being set to either the opened or closed state, depending on whether a user device 48 is connected to terminate the signal path 102/104/108 through the output 47. In another embodiment, from step 330 and step 340 the method can end.
In one embodiment, when an additional user device 48 is subsequently connected to a signal path terminated by the termination circuit 150 in step 340 (e.g., the additional user device 48 becomes connected to the user port 50), looping the method shown in
Other embodiments of the present invention are envisaged that will further increase the quality of signals. For example, it has been determined that reflections can be caused within each of the branches of a splitter. Some energy from signals passing through the splitter can reflect at each split, to cause undesirable signals and/or ingress noise that can deteriorate the signal quality in the CATV network. Accordingly, it has been determined that the quality of the desired signals can be increased even further when a signal path is terminated upstream, or as far upstream as possible, from a signal branch, or as many signal branches as possible, within the splitter.
Exemplary embodiments of circuits and methods according to the invention that can terminate signals farther upstream (e.g., closer to the supplier-side port) will now be described. Referring to
Referring to the signal branches that lead to user-side ports 220 and 222,
For improved or the best reduction of reflection, a termination circuit 150 can be positioned upstream from as many splits as possible (e.g., upstream from signal branches 204 and 206), toward the supplier-side port 201. For improved or the best reduction of noise ingress, a termination circuit 150 can be positioned as close to each user-side port 216, 218, 220, and 222 as possible, on signal branches 208, 210, 212, and 214.
To increase or maximize control over reducing both reflection and noise ingress, termination circuits 150 can be positioned on every branch. For instance, as illustrated in
Each particular configuration might require a different particular arrangement in logic circuitry. As described previously, the requirements to implement such circuitry is recognized and understood by one skilled in the art, given the description of the implementation of the configuration with respect to
The method of terminating a signal path through a user-side port, as described herein above with reference to
An embodiment of a method of reducing ingress noise on a signal path through a splitter in a CATV system, according to the invention will not be described. The method embodiment shown in
Referring to
First, according to step 600, a current can be applied to a conductor of at least one signal path through at least one user-side port. Continuing with the above example referencing
Next, according to step 610, it is determined whether the signal paths are terminated to a user side of a reference point. The user side is the downstream side of the reference point, which is also the side of the reference point toward the user-side port. The reference point can be a point in a portion of the termination circuit, such as the termination circuit 150 or the sensor circuit 160. In the continuing example referencing
According to decision box 620, if the at least one signal path (in this case, signal paths 202/204/208 and 202/204/210) is terminated to the user side of the reference point in a predetermined acceptable arrangement, then according to decision box 630, signals are passed through each of the at least one signal path (in this case, signals are passed through both signal paths 202/204/208 and 202/204/210) to the user side of a termination point. Otherwise, according to step 640, the signal paths (in this case, both signal paths 202/204/208 and 202/204/210) are interrupted and terminated to ground.
The termination point can be at a selected termination circuit 150. In the continuing example, the termination point 152 is at the termination circuit 150 on signal branch 204.
Each predetermined acceptable arrangement of the signal paths terminated to the user side of the reference point is the desired configuration of signal paths terminated to the user side of the reference point that causes a signal path to be interrupted and terminated. The particular arrangement or arrangements are determined to be acceptable by instantiating a particular configuration of the termination circuits 150 and the sensor circuits 160 on the signal branches in the splitter 100, 200 to produce the desired results. The desired results and functionality, as stated herein above, depend, in part, on a balance between reducing material and manufacturing cost, noise ingress, and reflection (e.g., individually or in various (weighted) combinations). It might be an acceptable arrangement to pass signals through each signal path 202/204/208 and 202/204/210 to the user side of the termination point 152 when only one of two possible downstream user-side ports (i.e. 216 or 218) is connected to a user device (not shown). Or it might be an acceptable arrangement to pass signals through each signal path 202/204/208 and 202/204/210 to the user side of the termination point only when each of the downstream user-side ports is connected to a user device. Other variations are also possible.
For illustration purposes, and in continuing with the example referencing
The same result occurs when a user device is connected to user-side port 218. Signals will be passed through each signal path 202/204/208 and 202/204/210 to the user side of the termination point 152, at least to the termination circuit 150 on each of signal branches 208 and 210.
At the termination circuit 150 on signal branch 208 and at the termination circuit 150 on signal branch 210, the respective signals might also be passed, or the respective signal paths 202/204/208 and 202/204/210 might be interrupted and terminated. The method described with respect to
Still referring to the same example referencing
To further illustrate with this same example referencing
If either or both user-side ports 216 or 218 is unterminated (including being unterminated by the termination circuits 150 on signal branches 208 and 210), then the termination circuit 150 on signal branch 204 will interrupt and terminate each signal path 202/204/208 and 202/204/210 to ground, according to step 640.
Possible configurations of signal paths terminated and unterminated (e.g., predetermined acceptable arrangements), beyond those described as examples herein, can be predetermined, to trigger interruption and termination of a termination circuit 150 when one of the predetermined terminated/unterminated signal path configurations exists. To predetermine the configuration, the exemplary method embodiments as described herein can vary, incorporating different logic and accommodating variations in the configuration and placement of the termination circuits. More signal paths can be considered simultaneously, for instance, and signal paths can be interrupted and terminated based upon different logic than that described and/or illustrated in the examples.
In each of the previous two example embodiments, the first example in which the termination circuit 150 on signal branch 204 terminates if neither signal path 202/204/208 nor signal path 202/204/210 is terminated, and the second example in which the termination circuit 150 on signal branch 204 terminates if either signal path 202/204/208 or signal path 202/204/210 is unterminated, the termination circuit 150 does not terminate if both termination circuits 150 on signal branches 208 and 210 do interrupt and terminate their respective signal paths to ground. Terminating at signal branch 204 when termination occurs at each of signal branches 208 and 210 might seem redundant and unnecessary to prevent noise ingress. However, it might be desirable to terminate the signal paths 202/204/208 and 202/204/210 on signal branch 204 as well, in order to lessen reflection. Therefore, such an exemplary extra condition can be included when predetermining the acceptable arrangements to pass signals through the signal paths 202/204/208 and 202/204/210 at the termination point 152.
Further, configurations to achieve exemplary embodiments according to the invention can be achieved in multiple ways. In one embodiment for instance, the signal circuit 150/160 on signal branch 208 and the signal circuit 150/160 on signal branch 210 can each communicate with the signal circuit 150/160 on signal branch 204, as depicted in
This written description uses examples to disclose exemplary embodiments of the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims. Further, while in numerous cases herein, wherein systems, apparatuses and methods are described as having a certain number of elements, it will be understood that such systems, apparatuses and methods can be practiced with fewer than the mentioned certain number of elements. Also, while a number of particular embodiments have been set forth, it will be understood that features and aspects that have been described with reference to each particular embodiment can be used with each remaining particularly set forth embodiment. For example, aspects or features described with respect to embodiments directed to
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/164,839, filed Mar. 30, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/186,603, filed Jun. 12, 2009. U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/164,839 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/186,603 are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3790909 | Le Fevre | Feb 1974 | A |
4512033 | Schrock | Apr 1985 | A |
4520508 | Reichert, Jr. | May 1985 | A |
4648123 | Schrock | Mar 1987 | A |
4677390 | Wagner | Jun 1987 | A |
4961218 | Kiko | Oct 1990 | A |
4982440 | Dufresne et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5010399 | Goodman et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5058198 | Rocci et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5126840 | Dufresne et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5214505 | Rabowsky et al. | May 1993 | A |
5231660 | West, Jr. | Jul 1993 | A |
5369642 | Shioka et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5548255 | Spielman | Aug 1996 | A |
5745836 | Williams | Apr 1998 | A |
5815794 | Williams | Sep 1998 | A |
5839052 | Dean et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5893024 | Sanders et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5937330 | Vince et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950111 | Georger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970053 | Schick et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6014547 | Caporizzo et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6049693 | Baran et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069960 | Mizukami et al. | May 2000 | A |
6094211 | Baran et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
H1858 | Ibelings | Sep 2000 | H |
6205138 | Nihal et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6348837 | Ibelings | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348955 | Tait | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373349 | Gilbert | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6377316 | Mycynek et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388539 | Rice | May 2002 | B1 |
6425132 | Chappell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6495998 | Terreault | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498925 | Tauchi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510152 | Gerszberg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6560778 | Hasegawa | May 2003 | B1 |
6570928 | Shibata | May 2003 | B1 |
6587012 | Farmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6622304 | Carhart | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640338 | Shibata | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6678893 | Jung | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683513 | Shamsaifar et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6725462 | Kaplan | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728968 | Abe et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6757910 | Bianu | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6804828 | Shibata | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6845232 | Darabi | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6877166 | Roeck et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6928175 | Bader et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7003275 | Petrovic | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7029293 | Shapson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039432 | Strater et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7162731 | Reidhead et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7283479 | Ljungdahl et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7454252 | El-Sayed | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7505819 | El-Sayed | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7530091 | Vaughan | May 2009 | B2 |
20010016950 | Matsuura | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020141347 | Harp et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144292 | Uemura et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166124 | Gurantz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040172659 | Ljungdahl et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040229561 | Cowley et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050034168 | Beveridge | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050183130 | Sadja et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050283815 | Brooks et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289632 | Brooks et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015921 | Vaughan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060205442 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060282871 | Yo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070288981 | Mitsuse et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288982 | Donahue | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080022344 | Riggsby | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040764 | Weinstein et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080127287 | Alkan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090031391 | Urbanek | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090047917 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077608 | Romerein et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100095344 | Newby et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
55080989 | Jun 1980 | JP |
55132126 | Oct 1980 | JP |
57091055 | Jun 1982 | JP |
58101582 | Jun 1983 | JP |
61157035 | Jul 1986 | JP |
62151088 | Jul 1987 | JP |
05191416 | Jul 1993 | JP |
07038580 | Feb 1995 | JP |
11069334 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2001177580 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002044636 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003032655 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004071476 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004080483 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005005875 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2007166109 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007166110 | Jun 2007 | JP |
WO-0024124 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0172005 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0233969 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-02091676 | Nov 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100244980 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61164839 | Mar 2009 | US | |
61186603 | Jun 2009 | US |