Patent Grant
8448440
This invention relates to steam engines as well as steam expanders that can be used as a part of a dual cycle engine, and especially to a method and apparatus for achieving higher efficiency in such engines and expanders.
Steam engines which operate in accordance with the well-known Rankine cycle have excellent greenhouse gas emission characteristics compared to internal combustion engines and accept a wide range of liquid and solid fuels including even organic waste and biomass which makes steam power an especially attractive alternative to engines requiring refined petroleum. Moreover, a catalytic converter is not necessary to meet emissions standards since steam generator combustion temperature at atmospheric pressure is below that required to create compounds of NOx. However, in the past, steam engines in smaller sizes suitable for use in cars and trucks have been inefficient compared to the internal combustion engine. A journal article Expander Efficiency by Stan Jakuba, Steam Automobile Club of America Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 2, April-June 2000, giving the results of 21 Rankine development programs, listed steam engines with a service life of over two years as having an Actual Overall Cycle Efficiency that ranged from 6% to 17.2%, of which the best three averaged 14.4%. This level of efficiency is insufficient to be competitive with combustion engines for vehicular use.
Although it has been reported in the literature that a reduced clearance space between the piston at the top center position and the cylinder head will improve efficiency in a steam engine, a significant clearance volume has been present in the past. First, the steam inlet and outlet passages add a certain volume. In addition, in actual engines it has been traditionally considered important to provide a degree of compression at the end of each return stroke to achieve a cushioning effect, in other words, a steam cushion to help balance the reciprocating forces. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 863,545, one object listed is to reduce clearance space. However, due to the cavities shown in the patent for allowing valve motion as well as what is referred to as a steam cross passage and head opening, a sizable clearance volume is unavoidable. Moreover, the need for two steam cam shafts with gearing adds to the cost and bulk of the engine.
In view of these and other shortcomings of the prior art it is the general object of the invention is to provide a new Rankine (steam) operating cycle that provides an extraordinary improvement in overall operating efficiency for a steam engine or expander enabling them to become competitive with the internal combustion engine in some vehicular applications.
Another object is to provide a steam engine expander for efficiently recovering waste heat energy from an internal combustion engine which typically wastes about two-thirds to three-fourths of the heat in the fuel that is consumed, thereby providing the prospect of an enormous saving in U.S. fuel imports which now amount to 9.667 million barrels per day (2009).
A more specific object is to provide a new steam operating cycle for a steam engine or steam expander that is substantially more efficient than the most efficient known steam cycle.
Yet another object of this invention is to provide a way to construct an engine that is effective in accurately timing the actuation of steam intake and exhaust from a steam expansion chamber which has virtually no empty pockets, recesses or ducts that contribute to the clearance volume.
Another object is to find a way to exhaust substantially all of the steam from a minute clearance space while at virtually the same instant admitting a fresh charge without impacting thermal efficiency from an engineering viewpoint as a result of losing admission mass directly to the exhaust outlet.
It is also an object to provide a valve, especially an automatic valve operating without an eccentric, camshaft or cam that eliminates counter-torque due to premature steam admission before dead center yet enables steam to enter efficiently after the dead center position is reached.
Another object is to provide an automatic steam inlet valve with a simple, self-contained way of varying the cutoff of steam into the steam expansion chamber during each power stroke while the engine is in operation.
Yet another object is to provide an easy-opening low impact-stress valve for admitting steam in which the opening force required is independent of steam pressure.
A further object is to provide a steam admission valve that will enhance engine efficiency by opening quickly with a snap action to reduce flow restriction characteristics of prior admission valves during the opening phase.
A further object is to provide a power source to assist in steam valve operation.
Still another object is to provide a simple mechanism that is able to time the operation of steam exhaust and admission valves using a single actuator for both.
These and other more detailed and specific objects and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by reference to the following figures and detailed description which illustrate by way of example but a few of the various forms of the invention within the scope of the appended claims.
All publications, applications and patents cited herein are incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, application or patent were specifically and individually reproduced herein and indicated to be incorporated by reference.
In spite of the far superior exhaust emission characteristics of a steam engine and its ability to use a variety of fuels including organic waste and biomass, steam engines have not been competitive with internal combustion from a thermal efficiency standpoint. In response to this and other problems, the present invention provides a method and apparatus for achieving remarkably improved thermal efficiency in a steam engine or steam expander. One important aspect of the invention results from discovery of a major advance that can be achieved by providing a piston clearance that approximates zero together with a negligible amount of compression, such that pressure in the clearance volume approximates ambient pressure or condenser pressure as the case may be at the end of the return stroke when the clearance is essentially zero. These two provisions working together simultaneously provide a method and apparatus which constitute a new engine apparatus and Rankine operating cycle that can be referred to as “zero clearance with zero compression”. The invention also provides an improved steam admission valve assembly that can be operated either automatically responsive to piston movement or by means of a cam shaft and cam or electrically by means of a solenoid to produce an intermittent magnetic field for operating one or more valves with further efficiency. A biphasic exhaust system is described in which a piston operated valve opens to exhaust steam in a primary phase, and, in a later secondary phase an auxiliary, normally open exhaust valve facing the top of the piston permits virtually all residual steam to be exhausted through the approximate end of the piston return stroke after which it is closed by the piston or by the cam and finally held closed during the power stroke by a fresh charge of steam injected into the clearance volume through the steam admission valve.
Steam engines currently available are represented by one of two design philosophies; counterflow or uniflow. The counterflow philosophy exemplified by the steam locomotive is based upon increasing work output by having compression work low at the expense of adding a generous portion of clearance between the piston and cylinder head at the end of the return stroke. The uniflow philosophy introduced in about 1907 and improved during the 1940's by Calvin Williams (U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,402,699 and 2,943,608) increased efficiency considerably over counterflow by lowering fuel energy input at the expense of substantial compression work. The compression of residual steam within the cylinder to throttle pressure allowed the engine to add heat to the cylinder and prevented a pressure drop as steam was injected at the beginning of the next power stroke.
A better understanding of the invention can be gained through a comparison of mathematical equations for Rankine cycles that describe the operation of previous steam engines and a new steam operating cycle of the present invention. The terms used to describe the mathematical relationships existing in the various cycles are listed below under the heading “NOTATIONS”.
The two prior design philosophies, counterflow and uniflow, are shown by their respective idealized pressure vs. volume (P/V) relationships illustrated in graphs plotted mathematically in
An ideal P/V diagram of the high pressure uniflow principle, sometimes referred to the Williams Cycle is illustrated in
These P/V diagrams are characterized by being free of engine friction, piston blow-by or radiation and convection losses. For purposes of comparison and clarity, the same will be assumed for the invention.
An important aspect of the present invention results from the discovery that a major advance can be achieved by providing operating conditions in a steam engine that approximate a zero piston clearance together with a negligible amount of compression such that the pressure in the clearance volume approximates ambient pressure or condenser pressure when a condenser is used at the end of the return stroke when the clearance approximates zero. These provisions working together simultaneously constitute a new operating cycle or method that can be referred to as a zero clearance with zero compression cycle or z-z-cycle (
The z-z-cycle of this invention illustrated in
The fundamental work equation of the z-z-cycle can be derived from basic thermodynamic relationships. The heat input is the product of the steam mass consumed per cycle and the enthalpy change (Δh) of the water through the steam generator (not shown).
Since VO=VRx, steam mass per cycle−m=ρsVo=ρsVRx heat energy added per cycle−=mΔh=ρsVRxΔh.
A performance comparison between counterflow, high compression uniflow and the z-z-cycle as a function of steam cutoff is given in
Since a true zero clearance can never be reached because the piston would then strike the cylinder head, due provision is also made to assure that the piston has sufficient clearance under any possible operating condition including an allowance for thermal expansion and tolerance stack-up. Although small amounts even in the range of about 4%-8% clearance or compression can be used in the invention, even these small amounts reduce thermal efficiency. Consequently in order to optimize the operation of the invention, they should both be lowered below that level as much as physical constraints permit. The term percent compression refers to the fraction of the maximum cylinder volume at which any compression begins and percent clearance refers to the height of the space between the piston and the head at top dead center (TDC) as a fraction of that at bottom dead center (BDC).
It is not the presence alone of an actual zero clearance or actual zero compression by itself that characterizes the invention, but rather the combination of a clearance volume that approaches or approximates zero working together simultaneously with a compression that also approaches or approximates zero at the end of the return stroke. In practice, an almost microscopic clearance between the piston and the head at the top dead center position is preferably less than about 0.080 inch and most preferably in a range of about 0.005-0.030 inch. This will usually be sufficient allowance for avoiding contact due to thermal expansion and tolerance stack-up. At the same time, virtually no compression is assured by the provision of several mechanical and design features of the invention that enable residual steam to be exhausted virtually until the piston confronts the cylinder head at top dead center and the steam admission valve is opened. In a preferred form, a biphasic exhaust is provided that includes a primary as well as an auxiliary exhaust phase. The primary exhaust can comprise a ring of ports in the cylinder proximate the bottom dead center position that preferably begin to open automatically about 136° after top dead center (TDC) and reach the full open position at bottom dead center (BDC) when the steam chamber reaches its maximum volume. An auxiliary exhaust port located in the cylinder head to be described more fully below is constructed to exhaust the remaining 30% of the residual steam mass.
It will be seen that in the two well-known prior art cycles of
It was recognized by Watt that the admission of steam must be cut off early in the power stroke to enhance engine efficiency by enabling expansion work to be performed after the admission valve closes. Consequently, being able to achieve good efficiency when an early cutoff is provided is especially important and the present invention is surprisingly far more efficient than prior cycles when an early cutoff is used. For example, a comparison between the indicated efficiency of the z-z-cycle and the most efficient steam engine known (the high compression uniflow engine cycle of Equation 2) shows that at a cutoff of 9%, the efficiency of the invention is about 11% improved over the uniflow efficiency, however at a cutoff of 7%, it is about 16% improved, and remarkably at a cutoff of 5%, it is about 30% improved above the efficiency of the best steam cycle known. This is shown graphically in
Because the possibility of physical contact between the piston and the cylinder head must be prevented and an allowance made for thermal expansion and tolerance, the zero condition for compression and clearance can only be closely approached but never achieved in practice. However, when used together simultaneously, although zero in each case is only approximated, the present invention provides both a thermodynamic cycle and engine design that achieves a new order of performance which does not differ substantially from that which would have been achieved had it been possible to actually reach zero for both clearance and compression.
To achieve the desired z-z-cycle and engine operating characteristics, several design features are used in combination. First, the crankshaft piston and connecting rod are dimensioned so that the piston closely approaches the cylinder head in order to achieve a virtual zero clearance. In addition, the cylinder, piston, crankshaft and connecting rod are formed or selected to provide clearance changes due to thermal expansion considered together with accumulated tolerances that are within the acceptable limits to prevent contact between the piston and the cylinder head during any possible operating condition. In addition, the valves are both preferably placed in the cylinder head. Also, the preferred admission valve and exhaust valve both comprise poppet valves with the admission valve opening in a direction proceeding away from the clearance volume while the exhaust valve is the opposite, opening toward the clearance volume. The face of both valves is preferably aligned or close to alignment with a confronting upper surface of the piston when the valves are in the closed position thereby reducing the clearance volume to a minimum since the faces of both valves will then be spaced about the same distance from the piston as the cylinder head itself. Thus, a clearance volume is made possible in which no pockets, recesses or passages are present. In a typical application of the invention, the height of the clearance volume will usually be only a small fraction of its maximum height at BDC, for example, about 0.2-3.0% and most preferably from about 0.2-0.5%.
Refer now to an example of the invention shown in
Briefly, the inlet valve assembly 29 comprises a steam pressure assisted normally closed poppet valve piston 38 with a peripheral cylindrical sidewall 38b sealingly mounted to reciprocate within the cylinder head. It is constructed in such a way that the opening force required is independent of steam pressure as well as having a provision to eliminate counter-torque upon opening as now will be described. The inlet valve assembly 29 in this case has a valve cover 31 formed from bronze or stainless steel secured by means of screw threads within a cylindrical bore 32 in the stainless steel cylinder head 23 and having a downwardly opening annular pocket to hold compression spring 37 for a cup-shaped poppet valve piston 38 slidably and sealingly mounted in a valve cylinder bore 33 in the head 23. At the lower end of the bore 33 is an annular steam admission chamber or steam chest 33a that communicates with high pressure steam inlet duct 33b connected to a throttle and steam supply (not shown). Inside the bore 33 above valve 38 is a cylindrical valve timing chamber 34. At the lower end of the head 23 is a hardened steel valve seat 35 which is threaded in place within a bored opening in the lower face of the cylinder head 23. Valve 38 which is yieldably biased against the upper conical sealing surface of the valve seat 35 by means of the compression spring 37 is a cup-shaped poppet valve formed from hardened high carbon or stainless steel that has a conical downwardly directed sealing surface 38c which engages and seals against a conical valve face of the seat 35 when the valve is closed. The poppet valve 38 has a peripheral cylindrical sidewall 38b above the conical seal surface 38c that is slidably mounted for reciprocation in the cylindrical chamber 34 within bore 33 and sealed by two cast iron compression rings 39 pinned with gaps 180° apart. The conical sealing surface 38c of valve element 38 at the lower end of the valve body extends on a diagonal proceeding downwardly and centrally from the peripheral sidewall 38b which is aligned above its outer edge. Valve 29 is not a balanced valve. Instead, the sidewall 38b acts as a steam-pressure isolating surface that prevents the pressure of steam in the surrounding annular steam chest 33a from exerting an axial force on the valve as long as the valve is closed. By the term “poppet” valve is meant a valve that lifts bodily from its seat. In this case however it also slides axially relative to the admission manifold or steam chest 33a and axially along a short rim 35a below steam chest 33a surrounding the upper edge of conical sealing face of the valve seat 35 which serves to delay the admission of steam until the valve 38 clears the rim and thus can be thought of as an opening delay element. Rim 35a is sealingly engaged with poppet valve 38 and can have a height, for example, of about 0.035 in. (0.89 mm).
Extending downwardly from the upper part of the cover 31 is a cylindrical metering barrel 40 having a central bore in which is screw threaded for adjustment a steam flow metering needle 41 that is sealed in the central bore of the barrel 40 by means of a rubber O-ring 41a. A conical point at the lower end of the needle 41 can be raised or lowered by screwing the needle up or down to control the flow of steam through a tapered metering orifice 40a from port 38a abutting the lower end of the metering barrel 40 into chamber 34 through ports 40b. The needle 41 serves as a timing control for selecting and regulating the fraction of the power stroke during which steam is admitted into the cylinder 12, i.e., the steam cutoff. Valve 38 is yieldably biased to the closed position shown by spring 37. However, once opened, valve 38 is held open momentarily by maintaining a steam pressure differential across it. To control the open period, one selects the position of needle 41 so as to regulate the rate of change in the steam pressure differential across valve 38 to achieve the timing desired. In this way, one can regulate the fraction of the power stroke that the inlet valve remains open (the cutoff) during each cycle throughout operation. As steam is injected into the cylinder 12 and flows through the orifice 40a past a needle 41, it will pass through ports 40b filling chamber 34 at the rate selected by needle 41 until the point is reached at which the pressure differential is reduced enough relative to that in the cylinder 12 to be overcome by the downward force of the compressed spring 37 which will then drive valve 38 against the valve seat 35 thereby regulating the fraction of the power stroke when the admission of steam is cut off. At the end of the power stroke and during exhaust the pressure above valve 38 will fall to ambient. The cycle is then repeated continuously throughout operation as steam admitted through valve 29 causes the piston 25 to reciprocate in the cylinder 12 so as to impart rotation to the crankshaft 27 via the connecting rod 28. Thus, in accordance with the invention the valve is held open by the steam pressure existing in the expansion chamber while regulating the flow rate of the steam from one side of the valve 38 to the other, i.e., across the valve.
If the metering barrel is formed from a magnetically permeable material, it can also serve as the core of an electrical valve actuator solenoid mounted above the cover 31 (not shown) or, if desired, at 34a within the chamber 34 surrounding the metering barrel 40 as indicated by dotted lines so that when actuated by a suitable electrical power supply the solenoid will provide an intermittent magnetic field for opening the valve 38 at precisely timed intervals for starting or if desired for running. The steam admission valve 38 is however preferably opened by the piston 25 or by a lifter 25b that could be secured to the valve or alternatively to the top of the piston as shown with its upper surface in this case about 0.058 in. (1.47 mm) above the piston top surface 25a. At the lower end of the bore 33 is a circle of circumferentially distributed axially extending guide columns 39a also shown in
The various lifters described herein which are attached to the piston are advantageous since they can be formed from hardened steel or alternatively both lifters can be springs. A steel cover 25c is placed over a lifter of spring 25d (
In a four cylinder engine (
Refer now to the exhaust valve assembly 30 (
The piston 25, connecting rod 28 and crankshaft 27 are dimensioned such that the top surface 25a of the piston when in the top center position is the located to approximate a zero clearance from the lower surface of the cylinder head as well as the inward facing surfaces of the poppet valves 38 and 42; in this case a gap of about 0.020 inch to allow for thermal expansion and connecting rod and wrist pin tolerances. It will seen that since the valve assemblies 29 and 30 are both positioned in the cylinder head and that each opens and closes a port also located in the cylinder head, the inward face of each of the valves 38 and 42 can be positioned to confront the opposing surface of the piston by a distance that approximates zero as the piston reaches the upper end of the return stroke. The clearance approximating zero is therefore established between the top of the piston and both valves 29 and 30 as well as the cylinder head.
In operation, the upper surface of the lifter 25b will strike the poppet piston valve 38 when the height of the clearance volume is about 0.058 in. from the top center position. Even after the conical valve sealing surface 38c is lifted off its seat as the piston continues to rise, the valve admission delay rim 35a will momentarily keep the valve from opening due to the seal it makes with the adjacent outer surface of the cylindrical wall 38b of valve element 38. This prevents power-robbing reverse torque caused by an injection of steam while the piston is still rising and readies the valve for full admission. However, when valve 38 clears the top of the sealing rim 35a, high pressure steam at typically at least about 800° F. and 800 psia is injected almost instantaneously from the steam chest 33a past the valve seat 35 and into the clearance volume instantly forcing valve 38 open with a snap action owing to sudden upward thrust caused by the high pressure of the steam now exposed to its lower surface at which point full admission is achieved. The upper surface of the resilient lifter 43 is positioned to bring exhaust valve 42 to the closed position substantially simultaneously with the opening of valve 38 while also avoiding compression of steam in the clearance volume as the last bit of the residual steam exits past the exhaust valve. However, if the lift of valve 42 is, say, 0.25 inch, the resilient valve lifter 43 will have just previously engaged exhaust valve 42 (normally held in the dotted line open position by the spring 42d) moving it to the closed position. This is considered to be within the meaning of the term substantially simultaneous as used herein. When valve 42 closes fully, the resiliency of lifter 43 enables the piston to continue moving toward the cylinder head until the top center position is reached after which the injected steam will then hold it closed until exhaust is released through ports 21a.
It is important to note that because the supply steam surrounds valve 38 in annular chamber 33a but is not exposed to an end of the valve or any other transverse surface as long as the valve is closed, the valve 38 is yieldably biased to its closed position by the force of spring 37 which is independent of the steam supply pressure that at, say, 800 psi would make the valve very difficult to open and subject to excessive wear or fracture. Yet when valve 38 opens only slightly, the entire force of the steam supply is exposed to its lower end, snapping it open with a steam power assist.
Refer now to
The engine 50 is a double acting engine in which it will be noted that the steam expansion chamber 70 is located inside the piston 62 between the piston 62 and a cylinder cap 72 that comprises the inner or steam cylinder head. The cap 72 has a pair of laterally spaced apart legs 74 and 76 which serve as supports that are rigidly secured to the crankcase 53 by bolts 53b to provide a vertical slot between the legs to accommodate the wrist pin 75 as described in pending application Ser. No. 12/539,987. Steam is admitted to the steam expansion chamber 70 from a high pressure steam supply line 105 by a steam admission valve 29 as described above that can be opened by a valve lifter 62b similar to 25b but on the lower, i.e. inward, wall of the head of piston 62 or alternatively by a cam and camshaft 54c coupled by a valve rocker 54d to a retraction rod 76a. The phase of the camshaft 54c and the resulting cutoff of steam as a fraction of the stroke of piston 62 can be selected and regulated by a controller, e.g. an electronic engine management computer 305 and phase change gear box 54 as described in pending application Ser. No. 12/387,113 enabling phase change of valve 29 to be accomplished either mechanically or electronically to vary steam cutoff as a selected fraction of each stroke during operation.
The steam expander assembly 51 can be operated as described hereinabove and in pending provisional applications 61/309,640, filed Mar. 2, 2010, and 61/320,959, dated Apr. 5, 2010, which show how the residual steam is allowed to escape through a supplemental exhaust valve port 73 in
During operation, the coolant 52a is continuously circulated through the cooling jacket 52 by a pump 97 to a heat exchanger that transfers heat from the coolant to a working fluid such as water or binary working fluid or any other suitable aqueous or non-aqueous working fluid known to those skilled in the art for producing steam as described more fully in copending application Ser. No. 12/844,607, which is heated in a steam generator 104 by combustion exhaust gases expelled from the exhaust pipe 56c to produce superheated steam that is fed through steam pipe 105 into a steam chest 72a communicating with the normally closed steam admission valve 29. Valve 29 is opened during operation by the lifter 62b attached to the inner surface of the piston 62 in a manner similar to that as described above in connection with
The primary exhaust of steam takes place when the piston 62 approaches the top center position as openings 62a come into alignment with ports 105a so that most of the steam is expelled from expansion space 70 through steam exhaust pipe 105b when the piston reaches the end of its stroke. A secondary exhaust is provided by a normally open exhaust valve 30 described above which is yieldably biased to open position by a compression spring 42d so that when the piston 62 moves inwardly, the lifter 73b attached to the inner surface of the piston head will contact the exhaust valve 42 forcing it to a closed position just as the piston 62 reaches the bottom dead center position with its inner surface positioned an almost microscopic distance approximating a zero clearance, e.g. 020 inch from the upper surface of the inner cylinder head 72. Lifter 73b can be formed from a resilient material, such as helical compression spring or Belleville spring to keep valve 30 closed until steam is injected through valve 29.
In operation, high pressure steam from pipe 105 supplied via steam chest 72a through valve 29 is admitted into the steam expansion chamber 70 each time the lifter 62b contacts the valve 29 while at virtually at the same instant lifter 73b closes valve 30 so that the blast of steam injected into the clearance volume holds the valve 30 closed as the steam pressure drives the piston 62 upwardly until release through openings 62a allowing steam to be exhausted at 105b in the primary exhaust phase. As soon as cylinder pressure drops, the exhaust valve 30 opens responsive to the force of the helical compression opening spring 42d so that the steam expander 51 functions throughout operation as a zero clearance with zero compression expander to supplement the power produced by combustion using steam introduced through steam pipe 105 that has been provided by waste combustion heat. Residual steam passing out through exhaust valve 30 is expelled through an exhaust pipe 77, then together with the steam exhausted through the steam outlet pipe 105b it is sent to a condenser 106 and reheated to produce steam which is fed back through pipe 105 in an endless closed circuit.
During normal running of the engine, pipe 98 carries the coolant from jacket 52 and pump 97 into countercurrent heat exchanger 99. Pipe 110 then returns it back to cooling jacket 52. In a separate circuit, a vaporizable working fluid, such as water or water and ethylene glycol or other suitable known vaporizable aqueous or organic working fluid flows from heat exchanger 99 through a pressurizing pump 101 then to steam generator 104 which functions as a superheater that is fired by combustion exhaust gas discharged from the combustion exhaust pipe 56c through pipe 61 into steam generator 104 and exits through exhaust pipe 63 after superheating steam which flows from pump 101 through pipe 105 into steam chest 72a. The term “steam” herein is used broadly to include vapor from water as well as organic fluids or other suitable known working fluid. The steam generator 104 can comprise an enlarged combustion exhaust manifold for superheating the steam as described in the aforementioned copending applications. The coolant 52a is preferably a non-aqueous liquid, e.g. a mono or polyhydric alcohol or glycol preferably having a boiling point above 225° F. which is heated far above the boiling point of water to serve as a thermal interface between two different thermodynamic cycles of energy conversion, specifically, between an Otto or diesel cycle and the zero clearance with zero compression cycle as described in copending application Ser. No. 12/884,607, filed Jul. 27, 2010. One suitable coolant is anhydrous propylene glycol B.P. 375° F. which can be run continuously at 300° F. or above.
The coolant in heat exchanger 99 after dumping its heat load to the feed water is returned via pipe 110 to the cooling jacket 52.
The valves 29 and 30 as well as their lifters can be constructed and operated in accordance with any of the embodiments described herein. If a camshaft 54c, rocker and valve retractor 76a is used for operating the admission valve 29, the lifter 62b is unnecessary. The embodiment of
In this way, efficiency of the z-z-cycle of the present invention can be carried over to the dual cycle application providing additional improvements of system efficiency. For example, in a combustion engine losing, say 65%, of the lower heating value of the fuel using the expander of
Another optional form of steam admission valve that can be used in place of valve 29 (
The operation of valve 112 is as follows. When the piston 25 approaches the cylinder head 23, the lifter 132 makes contact with element 122 forcing it as well as the valve element 114 upwardly against the closing force of springs 115 and 125, but the valve 112 does not open during the first half of the cycle of contact between lifter 132 and the valve since the core element 114 remains in contact with seat 121. However, when the piston 25 closely approaches the cylinder head 23 providing a virtual zero clearance at the end of its stroke that may typically be about 0.020 inch (just enough to prevent the piston 14 from contacting the head 23 due to thermal expansion), the mechanical force exerted by the lifter 132 on valve 112 is then removed as it retreats away from the valve 112, and when the force is removed, valve element 122 will follow the lifter 132 remaining in contact with it due to the force of spring 125. By contrast, the core valve 114 is subject to very little inward, i.e. downward force owing to having no inner face subject to steam pressure as well as having a lighter seating spring 115, a greater mass than element 122 and being subject to the motion retarding effect of plunger 128 so that the inward movement of element 122 and the outward momentum of core element 114 imparted by lifter 132 will cause valve assembly 112 to pop open when the piston is at TDC just as the clearance space begins to expand.
Assuming valve lifter 132 contacts the valve through an arc of crank rotation totaling 6° (3° on either side of DC), valve element 122 will return to the its closed position as shown during the last 3° half of the contact cycle after dead center while the clearance space 47 is expanding but the core 114 which is held back and is slower to respond, as just described will, therefore, remain off of its seat 121 for a predetermined period of time allowing high pressure steam from supply duct 33b to flow between core valve 114 and element 122 filling the clearance space 47 as the clearance space expands, starting automatically when the piston changes direction yet without allowing steam to enter while the clearance volume 47 is contracting so as to prevent reverse torque as the clearance volume contracts. The valve assembly 112 is therefore able to utilize the full mass of the admitted steam to provide expansion work rather than filling an empty space so as to achieve maximum efficiency. The open period of the valve of
In ordinary gas and steam engines, flow restriction (wire drawing) through partly opened valves as well as the delay caused by the need to accelerate the charge of steam can be partially offset by using a valve advance. A valve advance is effective in a standard engine because space is present into which the charge can flow from the valve. However, a zero clearance with zero compression engine by definition has virtually no clearance volume at TDC making valve advance ineffective especially here where the core valve 114 has enough momentum to open rapidly. Moreover, counter-torque due to opening the valve before dead center would produce a power loss.
At 3000 rpm a bump valve lifter attached to the piston crown may have an average velocity around seven feet per second when it contacts the valve. Here, the element 122 is provided with a strong spring 125 that will hold it in contact with the lifter 132 as the higher mass and lighter spring of the core valve element 114 enables momentum produced by the lifter 132 to open it quickly.
Refer now to
The zero clearance zero compression engine 300 is operated by the single camshaft 310 in the following way. Near the end of each power stroke most of the steam is exhausted via cylinder ports 318 through the primary exhaust pipe 318a. Exhaust valve 312 is held in the open position by spring 312a after steam release through ports 318 while the admission valve spring 315a normally holds admission valve 316 in the closed position as shown in
As described thus far, this embodiment is suitable for a fixed cutoff which is useful in an engine that is designed to run on a constant speed and load, for example the battery charging module of a vehicle that is run on batteries but needs to be recharged like the General Motors Volt car. However, if it is desired to vary the cutoff of steam to the cylinder 301 selectively during the cycle, the valve 316 can be provided with a timing control chamber 316b that has compartments above and below plunger 316c which are connected through a duct 316d with a flow metering needle valve 316e for varying the rate the spring 315a is able to return the valve 316 to the seated position by regulating flow from the lower end of the timing control chamber to the upper end around the plunger 316c.
If desired, the relative timing of the valves can be set for closing of valve 312 and opening of valve 316 at the same instant or with a slight exhaust lead by first jacking the engine forward with exhaust valve 312 held shut until cam lobe 310a touches follower 308. The bridge 311 is then slid up on the post until it rests on the closing spring 312b and the setscrews 311a are then tightened. Nut 315 is then lowered by screwing it down while a feeler gauge is used to provide a 0.020 inch gap at 314. Nut 315 is then locked in place with a locknut (not shown). The 0.020 inch gap will allow about 9.3° rotation before the bridge 311 hits the timing adjustment nut 315 which at 2400 rpm is about 65×10−5 seconds later; a period of time well within the meaning of the term “substantially simultaneous” as used herein. Also, without using a gap 314 both valves will be actuated without an intervening time period. With or without a gap 314, it will be understood that the valve assembly of
The valve operating mechanism of
Many variations of the present invention within the scope of the appended claims will be apparent to those skilled in the art once the principles described herein are understood.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 12/539,987, filed Aug. 12, 2009 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,061,140, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 12/492,773, filed Jun. 26, 2009 (now abandoned), a continuation-in-part of copending application Ser. No. 12/844,607, filed Jul. 27, 2010, a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 12/387,113, filed Apr. 28, 2009 and Ser. No. 12/075,042, filed Mar. 7, 2008 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,997,080. The applicants also claim the benefit of the following provisional applications: 61/309,640, filed Mar. 2, 2010; and 61/320,959, filed Apr. 5, 2010; and 60/905,732, filed Mar. 7, 2007, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 51081 | Pike | Nov 1865 | A |
| 175485 | Miracle | Mar 1876 | A |
| 606739 | Rothgery | Jul 1898 | A |
| 694547 | Hood | Mar 1902 | A |
| 753647 | Thorson | Mar 1904 | A |
| 845622 | Du Shane | Feb 1907 | A |
| 863545 | McLachlan | Aug 1907 | A |
| 1011516 | Stappen | Dec 1911 | A |
| 1027380 | Fryer | May 1912 | A |
| 1128125 | Fryer | Feb 1915 | A |
| 1169672 | Palm | Jan 1916 | A |
| 1210649 | Holley | Jan 1917 | A |
| 1217788 | Leidtke | Feb 1917 | A |
| 1324183 | Still | Dec 1919 | A |
| 1331665 | Ohborg | Feb 1920 | A |
| 1332633 | Parrish | Mar 1920 | A |
| 1359988 | Hansen | Nov 1920 | A |
| 1427395 | Kaschtofsky | Aug 1922 | A |
| 1489291 | Tuerk | Apr 1924 | A |
| 1496839 | Bohan et al. | Jun 1924 | A |
| 1502918 | Scott | Jul 1924 | A |
| 1517372 | Martineau | Dec 1924 | A |
| 1542578 | Pool | Jun 1925 | A |
| 1601995 | Butler et al. | Oct 1926 | A |
| 1629677 | Bull | May 1927 | A |
| 1630841 | Fusch | May 1927 | A |
| 1617838 | Norberg | May 1928 | A |
| 1732011 | Gouirand | Oct 1929 | A |
| 1802828 | Perrenoud | Apr 1931 | A |
| 1913251 | Smith | Jun 1933 | A |
| 1965569 | Anderson | Jul 1934 | A |
| 1987003 | Dole | Jan 1935 | A |
| 2000108 | Tucker | May 1935 | A |
| 2040453 | Weber | May 1936 | A |
| 2057075 | Wuehr | Oct 1936 | A |
| 2058485 | Miller | Oct 1936 | A |
| 2063970 | Young | Dec 1936 | A |
| 2138351 | McGonigall | Nov 1938 | A |
| 2341348 | Welby | Mar 1940 | A |
| 2196979 | Campbell | Apr 1940 | A |
| 2196980 | Campbell | Apr 1940 | A |
| 2269106 | Hoffmann | Jan 1942 | A |
| 2309968 | Marburg | Feb 1943 | A |
| 2402699 | Williams | Jun 1946 | A |
| 2560449 | Kahr et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
| 2604079 | Ray | Jul 1952 | A |
| 2632464 | Kerr | Mar 1953 | A |
| 2649078 | Kelly | Aug 1953 | A |
| 2671434 | Schmiedeskamp | Mar 1954 | A |
| 2730996 | Doble | Jan 1956 | A |
| 2943608 | Williams | Jul 1960 | A |
| 2957462 | Clark | Oct 1960 | A |
| 3033181 | Barnes et al. | May 1962 | A |
| 3200798 | Mansfield | Aug 1965 | A |
| 3216329 | Peterson | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3279326 | Harvey | Oct 1966 | A |
| 3397619 | Sturtevant | Aug 1968 | A |
| 3489162 | Meynell | Jan 1970 | A |
| 3493003 | Peoples | Feb 1970 | A |
| 3603344 | Stampfli | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3609061 | Peoples | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3650295 | Smith | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3653297 | Peoples | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3662553 | Hodgkinson | May 1972 | A |
| 3719322 | Gifford | Mar 1973 | A |
| 3759141 | Zibrun | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3877231 | Tinker | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3877479 | Miyawaki | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3882833 | Longstaff | May 1975 | A |
| 3908686 | Carter et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3921404 | Mason | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3990238 | Bailey | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3995531 | Zibrun | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4023537 | Carter, Sr. et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4050357 | Carter, Sr. et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4077214 | Burke et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4079586 | Kincaid, Jr. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4168655 | Kitrilakis | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4201058 | Vaughan | May 1980 | A |
| 4300353 | Ridgway | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4362132 | Neuman | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4377934 | Marshall | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4425763 | Porta et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4491057 | Ziegler | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4509464 | Hansen | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4561256 | Molignoni | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4590766 | Striebich | May 1986 | A |
| 4706462 | Soltermack | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4724800 | Wood | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4747271 | Fisher | May 1988 | A |
| 4785631 | Striebich | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4829947 | Lequesne | May 1989 | A |
| 4864826 | Lagow | Sep 1989 | A |
| 5121607 | George, Jr. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5385211 | Carroll | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5657962 | Neron et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5803022 | Nelson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 6095100 | Hughes | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6220210 | Kobayashi | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6237550 | Hatano | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6443111 | LaDow | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6457309 | Firey | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6745794 | Gajewski | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6834503 | Freymann | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6895756 | Schmotolocha | May 2005 | B2 |
| RE38750 | Weaver | Jul 2005 | E |
| 7056251 | Ibaraki | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7104063 | Clemens | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7267113 | Tsuge et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7536943 | Pritchard | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7841309 | Grundl | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7856822 | Schoell | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7992386 | Schoell | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7997080 | Harmon, Sr. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8061140 | Harmon, Sr. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8109097 | Harmon, Sr. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 20030226603 | Gajewski | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20050263189 | Nakamura | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20080216480 | Harmon | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090205338 | Harmon | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090293480 | Harmon | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100043896 | Shock et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100058751 | Chavez | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095662 | Chavez | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100300100 | Harmon | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110083434 | Peoples | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20120192561 | Coates | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 3437151 | Apr 1986 | DE |
| 1750 | Jan 1912 | GB |
| 25356 | Jan 1911 | GB |
| 28472 | Jan 1913 | GB |
| 125395 | Apr 1919 | GB |
| 130621 | Aug 1919 | GB |
| WO 0231319 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 03050402 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| John R. Allen et al., Heat Engines, McGraw Hill Book Company, 1925, pp. 205-207: pp. 213-215. |
| Harry R. Solberg, et al, Elementary Heat Power, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Copyright 1946, 1952, pp. 150-154: pp. 448-450: pp. 465-469. |
| Frank D. Graham, Audels Engineers & Mechanics Guide 2, Theo. Audel & Company, Copyright 1921, 1927, 1938, reprinted 1943, pp. 593 & 606. |
| Jerry Peoples, The Lore of Steam Automotive Power, Copyright 2007, privately published by Jerry A. Peoples, May 2007, pp. 47-60 & 90-118. Figures 9-8 to 9-12. |
| J.R. Allen and J.A. Bursley, Heat Engines,1925 Third Edition, pp. 210 and 211, McGraw Hill, New York, U.S. |
| Jerry Peoples, Gewgaws of Production Steam, The Steam Automobile Bulletin, Sep.-Oct. 2006, vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 7-13. |
| J.V. Haywood, Internal Combustion Engines, McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1988 pp. 657-659. |
| D.A. Low, Heat Engines, Longmans, Green & Co. 1949, pp. 246-248. |
| Marks, et. al., Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers, McGraw-Hill, Inc. 9th ed. 1987, pp. 9-36 to 9-38. |
| An Assessment of the Technology of Rankine Engines for Automobiles. Division of Transportation Energy Conservation, U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Apr. 1977, pp. 22-24. |
| Bill Cartland, Easy Starting Bash Valve, Steam Automobile Club of America, Inc. Technical Report No. 120, 1993, one page. |
| Ronald Loving, Low NOx Thermal Oxidizers, Steam Automobile Bulletin, vol. 20 No. 5, Sep.-Oct. 2006, pp. 28-30. |
| Tom Kimmel, The Leslie Engine, Steam Automobile Bulletin, vol. 21 No. 5, Sep.-Oct. 2007, pp. 14-16. |
| D.A. Arias, et. al., Theoretical Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery From and Internal Combustion Engine in a Hybrid Vehicle, SAE Technical Paper, 2006-01-1605, Apr. 3-6, 2006. |
| S.S. Miner, Developments in Automotive Steam Power Plants, SAE Technical Paper, No. 690043, Jan. 13-17, 1969. |
| BMW's Hybrid Vision: Gasoline and Steam, Popular Science Magazine, Mar. 2006, p. 22 (one page). |
| An Assessment of the Technology of Rankine Engines for Automobiles Div. of Transportation Energy Conservation, U.S. Energy Research & Develop. Admin., Apr. 1977, pp. 43-54. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110083434 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61309640 | Mar 2010 | US | |
| 61320959 | Apr 2010 | US | |
| 60905732 | Mar 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12539987 | Aug 2009 | US |
| Child | 12959025 | US | |
| Parent | 12492773 | Jun 2009 | US |
| Child | 12539987 | US | |
| Parent | 12387113 | Apr 2009 | US |
| Child | 12492773 | US | |
| Parent | 12075042 | Mar 2008 | US |
| Child | 12387113 | US |
