Method and apparatus for adapting a variable impedance network

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10263595
  • Patent Number
    10,263,595
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 10, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 16, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
The present disclosure may include, for example, a tunable capacitor having a decoder for generating a plurality of control signals, and an array of tunable switched capacitors comprising a plurality of fixed capacitors coupled to a plurality of switches. The plurality of switches can be controlled by the plurality of control signals to manage a tunable range of reactance of the array of tunable switched capacitors. Additionally, the array of tunable switched capacitors is adapted to have non-uniform quality (Q) factors. Additional embodiments are disclosed.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates to variable impedance networks and more specifically to a method and apparatus for adapting a variable impedance network.


BACKGROUND

Existing multi-frequency wireless devices (e.g., radios) use an antenna structure that attempts to radiate at optimum efficiency over the entire frequency range of operation, but can really only do so over a subset of the frequencies. Due to size constraints, and aesthetic design reasons, an antenna designer may be forced to compromise the performance in some of the frequency bands. An example of such a wireless device could be a mobile telephone that operates over a range of different frequencies, such as 800 MHz to 2200 MHz. The antenna will not radiate efficiently at all frequencies due to the nature of the design, and the power transfer between the antenna, the power amplifier, and the receiver in the radio can vary a considerable amount.


Additionally, an antenna's performance can be impacted by its operating environment. For example, multiple use cases exist for radio handsets, which include such conditions as the placement of the handset's antenna next to a user's head, in the user's pocket, the covering of an antenna with a hand, a pull-out antenna in the up position or down position, a flip phone with the lid open versus closed, hands-free operation with a Bluetooth headset or speakerphone feature, or other operational possibilities, all of which can affect the wireless device antenna's radiated efficiency.


Many existing radios use a simple circuit composed of fixed value components that are aimed at improving the power transfer from power amplifier to antenna, or from the antenna to the receiver, but since the components used are fixed in value there is typically a compromise when attempting to cover multiple frequency bands and multiple use cases.


Prior art systems have attempted to solve this problem by employing a variety of tunable elements in the radio frequency path, thus attempting to compensate for changing antenna performance. Typically, prior art system arrange these adjustable elements into single device substrates or semiconductor die, both to re-use control and bias circuitry between several tunable capacitors on the same die and to reduce the number of input/output connection pads necessary to connect the devices to external circuitry.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a communication device;



FIG. 2 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a portion of a transceiver of the communication device of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 3-4 depict illustrative embodiments of a tunable matching network of the transceiver of FIG. 2;



FIGS. 5-6 depict illustrative embodiments of a tunable reactive element of the tunable matching network;



FIG. 7 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a switched variable capacitor array controlled by a switch decoder;



FIG. 8 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a simplified diagram of the switched variable capacitor array of FIG. 7;



FIGS. 9-11 depict illustrative embodiments for improving a switched variable capacitor array;



FIG. 12 depicts an illustrative embodiment for integrating any of the improved switched variable capacitor array of FIGS. 9-11 in a single Integrated Circuit (IC) or semiconductor die device;



FIGS. 13-17 depict illustrative embodiments of topologies applied to the IC device of FIG. 12;



FIGS. 18-20 depict illustrative embodiments of low band and high band matching networks;



FIG. 21 shows TABLE 1 which depicts an illustrative embodiment of a table with digital logic for controlling of a binary-switched capacitor array; and



FIG. 22 shows TABLE 2 which depicts an illustrative embodiment of a table with digital logic for controlling a non-binary-switched capacitor array.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An embodiment of the present disclosure can entail a tunable capacitor having a decoder for generating a plurality of control signals, and an array of tunable switched capacitors comprising a plurality of fixed capacitors coupled to a plurality of switches. The plurality of switches can be controlled by the plurality of control signals to manage a tunable range of reactance of the array of tunable switched capacitors. Additionally, the array of tunable switched capacitors is adapted to have non-uniform quality (Q) factors.


An embodiment of the present disclosure can entail a variable matching network having a plurality of tunable capacitors contained on a single substrate. The single substrate can have a plurality of ports coupled to portions of the plurality of tunable capacitors. Additionally, the variable matching network can be configurable in a plurality of topologies by way of the plurality of ports.


An embodiment of the present disclosure can entail a device having first and second variable capacitors within a single substrate with each end of said first and second variable capacitors having an accessible external port, wherein the first and second variable capacitors are adapted to be configured as a Tee, Pi or L circuit topology.


An embodiment of the present disclosure can entail a method for causing an array of tunable switched capacitors to adapt to a variable load impedance, wherein the array of tunable switched capacitors is configured to have non-uniform Q factors.


An embodiment of the present disclosure can entail a tunable capacitor on a die having a decoder for generating a plurality of control signals, and an array of tunable switched capacitors including a plurality of fixed capacitors coupled to a plurality of switches. The plurality of switches can be controlled by the plurality of control signals to manage a tunable range of reactance of the array of tunable switched capacitors. One of the plurality of fixed capacitors can be optionally coupled to the array to reduce an aggregate parasitic capacitance of the array of tunable switched capacitors. The array of tunable switched capacitors can be adapted to have uniform quality (Q) factors.



FIG. 1 depicts an exemplary embodiment of a communication device 100. The communication device 100 can comprise a wireless transceiver 102 (herein having independent transmit and receiver sections, a user interface (UI) 104, a power supply 114, and a controller 106 for managing operations thereof. The wireless transceiver 102 can utilize short-range or long-range wireless access technologies such as Bluetooth, WiFi, Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT), or cellular communication technologies, just to mention a few. Cellular technologies can include, for example, CDMA-1×, WCDMA, UMTS/HSDPA, GSM/GPRS, TDMA/EDGE, EV/DO, WiMAX, and next generation cellular wireless communication technologies as they arise.


The UI 104 can include a depressible or touch-sensitive keypad 108 with a navigation mechanism such as a roller ball, joystick, mouse, or navigation disk for manipulating operations of the communication device 100. The keypad 108 can be an integral part of a housing assembly of the communication device 100 or an independent device operably coupled thereto by a tethered wireline interface (such as a flex cable) or a wireless interface supporting for example Bluetooth. The keypad 108 can represent a numeric dialing keypad commonly used by phones, and/or a Qwerty keypad with alphanumeric keys. The UI 104 can further include a display 110 such as monochrome or color LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) or other suitable display technology for conveying images to an end user of the communication device 100. In an embodiment where the display 110 is a touch-sensitive display, a portion or all of the keypad 108 can be presented by way of the display.


The power supply 114 can utilize common power management technologies (such as replaceable batteries, supply regulation technologies, and charging system technologies) for supplying energy to the components of the communication device 100 to facilitate portable applications. The controller 106 can utilize computing technologies such as a microprocessor and/or digital signal processor (DSP) with associated storage memory such a Flash, ROM, RAM, SRAM, DRAM or other like technologies.



FIG. 2 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a portion of the wireless transceiver 102 of the communication device 100 of FIG. 1. In GSM applications, the transmit and receive portions of the transceiver 102 can include common amplifiers 201, 203 coupled to a tunable matching network 202 and an impedance load 206 by way of a switch 204. The load 206 in the present illustration can an antenna as shown in FIG. 1 (herein antenna 206). A transmit signal in the form of a radio frequency (RF) signal (TX) can be directed to the amplifier 201 which amplifies the signal and directs the amplified signal to the antenna 206 by way of the tunable matching network 202 when switch 204 is enabled for a transmission session. The receive portion of the transceiver 102 can utilize a pre-amplifier 203 which amplifies signals received from the antenna 206 by way of the tunable matching network 202 when switch 204 is enabled for a receive session. Other configurations of FIG. 2 are possible for other types of cellular access technologies such as CDMA. These undisclosed configurations are contemplated by the present disclosure.



FIGS. 3-4 depict illustrative embodiments of the tunable matching network 202 of the transceiver 102 of FIG. 2. In one embodiment, the tunable matching network 202 can comprise a control circuit 302 and a tunable reactive element 310. The control circuit 302 can comprise a DC-to-DC converter 304, one or more digital to analog converters (DACs) 306 and one or more corresponding buffers 308 to amplify the voltage generated by each DAC. The amplified signal can be fed to one or more tunable reactive components 504, 506 and 508 such as shown in FIG. 5, which depicts a possible circuit configuration for the tunable reactive element 310. In this illustration, the tunable reactive element 310 includes three tunable capacitors 504-508 and an inductor 502 with a fixed inductance. Other circuit configurations are possible, and thereby contemplated by the present disclosure.


The tunable capacitors 504-508 can each utilize technology that enables tunability of the capacitance of said component. One embodiment of the tunable capacitors 504-508 can utilize voltage or current tunable dielectric materials such as a composition of barium strontium titanate (BST). An illustration of a BST composition is the Parascan® Tunable Capacitor. In another embodiment, the tunable reactive element 310 can utilize semiconductor varactors. Other present or next generation methods or material compositions that can support a means for a voltage or current tunable reactive element are contemplated by the present disclosure.


The DC-to-DC converter 304 can receive a power signal such as 3 Volts from the power supply 114 of the communication device 100 in FIG. 1. The DC-to-DC converter 304 can use common technology to amplify this power signal to a higher range (e.g., 30 Volts) such as shown. The controller 106 can supply digital signals to each of the DACs 306 by way of a control bus of “n” or more wires to individually control the capacitance of tunable capacitors 504-508, thereby varying the collective reactance of the tunable matching network 202. The control bus can be implemented with a two-wire common serial communications technology such as a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) bus. With an SPI bus, the controller 106 can submit serialized digital signals to configure each DAC in FIG. 3 or the switches of the tunable reactive element 404 of FIG. 4. The control circuit 302 of FIG. 3 can utilize common digital logic to implement the SPI bus and to direct digital signals supplied by the controller 106 to the DACs.


In another embodiment, the tunable matching network 202 can comprise a control circuit 402 in the form of a decoder and a tunable reactive element 404 comprising switchable reactive elements such as shown in FIG. 6. In this embodiment, the controller 106 can supply the control circuit 402 signals via the SPI bus which can be decoded with common Boolean or state machine logic to individually enable or disable the switching elements 602. The switching elements 602 can be implemented with semiconductor switches or micro-machined switches such as utilized in micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS). By independently enabling and disabling the reactive elements 604 (capacitor or inductor) of FIG. 6 with the switching elements 602, the collective reactance of the tunable reactive element 404 can be varied.


The tunability of the tunable matching networks 202, 204 provides the controller 106 a means to optimize performance parameters of the transceiver 102 such as, for example, but not limited to, transmitter power, transmitter efficiency, receiver sensitivity, power consumption of the communication device, a specific absorption rate (SAR) of energy by a human body, frequency band performance parameters, and so on. To achieve one or more desirable performance characteristics which can be defined, the communication device 100 utilizes a tuning state selection method as depicted in FIG. 7.



FIG. 7 depicts an illustrative embodiment of a switched variable capacitor array controlled by a switch decoder. The switched variable capacitor array can collectively represent one variable capacitor having a tuning range of operation which depends on the switching logic used to add and remove the fixed capacitors (C1-C5) shown in the top portion. Each of the fixed capacitors C1-C5 can be removed or applied to the array by a semiconductor (or MEMS) switch (S1) controlled by a switch decoder that utilizes common Boolean and/or state machine logic to enable or disable the switches according to a predetermined tuning range. Each switch (S1) has parasitic on-resistance and off-capacitance that can be controlled by an integrated circuit designer by the channel size of the switch and by the number of parallel and/or series semiconductor (or MEMS) switches used. The structure and size of each switch (S1) determines the magnitude of these parasitics and the affect it has on the operating characteristics of the switched variable capacitor array as will be discussed shortly. For ease of discussion, references may be made to FIG. 8 which depicts an illustrative embodiment of a simplified diagram of the switched variable capacitor array of FIG. 7 without the switch decoder.



FIGS. 9-11 depict illustrative embodiments for improving the switched variable capacitor array of FIG. 8. Note that although FIGS. 9-11 do not show the parasitic capacitance depicted in FIGS. 7-8, such capacitance is inherently present in switches S1-S5, but not shown to simplify the illustration in these figures.


One embodiment of the present disclosure can entail changing the configuration and connections of the binary array of switchable capacitors such that some portions of the array, typically the largest capacitor in the array (C5), can be left unconnected from the substrate if the larger value is not required by a specific tunable matching network for a specific application. For instance a typical switchable capacitor binary array can have the following values in the array: ¼ pF, ½ pF, 1 pF, 2 pF and 4 pF (shown in FIGS. 9-11). This array can theoretically be tunable between 0 pF and 7¾ pF by either connecting or disconnecting none, some or all of the capacitors in the array to the tunable matching network. However, there are practical limitations to the minimum capacitance which can be achieved in the actual fabrication of such a binary array.


Specifically, the switches themselves can have a certain amount of parasitic off-capacitance as shown in FIG. 8 which is present when the switch is in the “open” configuration, thus this parasitic capacitance limits the minimum capacitance value of the array to a value larger than zero. It is common for each individual capacitor-switch combination (e.g., C1-S1) shown in FIGS. 9-11 to have parasitic resistance and capacitance (Cp, Rp) shown in the switch combination Sn of FIG. 7. As the switches are made larger, which is necessary as the switched capacitance gets larger (to maintain circuit quality factor Q and reduce losses), this parasitic capacitance grows proportionally. Thus, arrays that have large values of capacitance and are able to adjust to higher total capacitance values are inherently limited in how low they can also adjust.


For illustration purposes, suppose the parasitic capacitance of each capacitor-switch combination is ¼ the value of the fixed capacitor of the capacitor-switch combination. One can gather that the parasitic capacitance of the first capacitor-switch combination would be 1/16 pF, the second capacitor-switch combination ⅛ pF, the third capacitor-switch combination ¼ pF, the fourth capacitor-switch combination ½ pF, and the fifth capacitor-switch combination 1 pF. When all switches are in the off state, the aggregate off capacitance is 1.9375 pF which can be approximated to 2 pF. The maximum capacitance of the array of five capacitors is 7.75 pF (¼+½+1+2+4) which can be approximated to 8 pF. Taking into consideration parasitic capacitance in the off state, and the total capacitance of all fixed capacitors when engaged, one can surmise that the binary array of FIG. 9 as a 4:1 tuning ratio. The parasitic capacitance of the largest corresponding switch (S5) can add 1 pF which limits the minimum value of the array to 2 pF, thereby increasing the minimum capacitance value available to the circuit.


One aspect of a switched capacitor is that the circuit quality or Q of the switched capacitor includes the resistive losses in the MEMS or semiconductor switch which is in series with the capacitor. The Q of the resultant switched capacitor is the ratio of the reactance of the capacitor to the resistance of the combined switch and capacitor which we will define as Rtotal.

Rtotal=Rsw+Rcap


Where Rsw is the resistance of the switch connected to a particular capacitor and Rcap is the effective series resistance of the particular capacitor in the array. The reactance of the capacitor, Xc is:







Xc
=

1

ω





C



,




where ω=2 πf


where f is the frequency of operation. Therefore, the Q of the switched capacitor is:






Q
=



X
c


R
total


=




1
/
ω






C


R
total


=


1

ω






R
total


C


=


1

2

π






fR
total


C


=

1

2

π






f


(


R
sw

+

R
cap


)



C










A similar analysis can be done wherein the switched reactances are inductors instead of capacitors. In that case, the reactance of the inductor, XL is:

XL=ωL,


where ω=2πf


where f is the frequency of operation. Therefore, the Q of the switched inductor is:






Q
=



X
L


R
total


=



ω





L


R
total


=



2

π





fL


R
total


=


2

π





fL


(


R
sw

+

R
cap


)









Correspondingly, in order to maintain Q at a given frequency of operation, the resistance of the switch in the array must be inversely proportional to the size of the inductor in the array. Therefore, if an inductor in the array is one half the size of the next inductor in the array, the resistance of that switch must also be one half the resistance of the switch for the preceding inductor. As such, the smallest inductor in the array must have the largest switch (in order to reduce resistance and hence maintain Q) which is the opposite relationship of the switchable capacitor array. However, although the relationship is reversed by virtue of the nature of the reactance of the switched component, it is understood that all of the characteristics and attributes being described herein can be applied to either capacitors or inductors with this simple modification. What follows are illustrative embodiments of tunable switched capacitor arrays. However, a tunable switched inductor array is also contemplated by the present disclosure.


Typically, for size and cost reasons the fixed capacitors in the array will be situated within the semiconductor die and will be built using typical semiconductor capacitor fabrication methods such as metal-insulator-metal (MIM) or other known technologies. These semiconductor capacitor technologies are typically limited in the Q values they are capable of achieving, and as seen in the expressions above, the Q of these fixed capacitors has a significant impact on the total Q of the tunable capacitor array, and as such force the designer to size the switches large enough to compensate for the limited Q of the fixed capacitors. This limitation has the most impact on the die size of the switch connected to the largest value capacitor in the array.


Replacing this largest value capacitor with an external fixed capacitor would allow the designer to utilize a capacitor with a Q perhaps twice the Q available from semiconductor capacitors, and by doing so would allow the designer to reduce the size of the largest switch in the array significantly—see FIG. 11. For example, if the designer needed to maintain a Q factor for the switched capacitor of 60, by using an external capacitor with a Q of 250 instead of an internal semiconductor capacitor with a Q of 150 the designer would be able to increase the resistance of the switch on that capacitor by over 25%, which would allow the die area of that particular switch to be about 20% smaller. Since the switch for the largest capacitor in the binary array usually accounts for about ½ of the total switch die area of the array, this area savings would amount to approximately 10% of the total array switch area.


As was stated previously, in a typical switched capacitor binary array, the individual capacitor values are selected such that each capacitor is twice the capacitance of the previous capacitor in the array, with the smallest capacitor being the size required for the minimum resolution of the tunable capacitor. One can see that as the value of C increases, in order to maintain a particular Q value the resistance of the switch connected to the capacitor has to be decreased inversely proportionally. From further examination of the expression for Q, it can also be seen that the Q of the switched capacitor is inversely proportional to the operating frequency, such that the minimum Q value is apparent at the highest operating frequency of the capacitor. In other words, the switch must be designed to have a resistance small enough to maintain the target Q value at the highest frequency of operation.


This characteristic has an aspect that can be taken advantage of when a tunable capacitor such as shown in FIGS. 7-11 is utilized in a matching network of a cellular handset that operates over a wide frequency range such as, for example, 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz and 1900 MHz frequency bands. For convenience we will refer to the 850 MHz and 900 MHz bands as the “low bands” as they are both below 1 GHz and the 1800 MHz and 1900 MHz bands as the “high bands” as they are both just below 2 GHz. Considering the above expression for the Q of a switched capacitor, it is evident that in order to maintain the same value of Q, the resistance of a switch would need to be approximately half as large for a capacitor of a given value operating in the high bands as it would be for the same capacitor operating in the low bands. To accomplish this on a MEMS or semiconductor switch die would correspondingly require twice the die area to create the switch for the capacitor to operate in the high band as it would to operate in the low band.


It is another characteristic typical of tunable matching networks that larger value capacitors are usually only required when operating in the low band, while smaller capacitors are typically utilized when operating in the high band. This is primarily due to the fact that the reactance is an inverse function of the operating frequency as seen above, and as frequency increases, large value capacitors become very low in reactance, and as such have little effect on tuning or matching at high band frequencies when they are placed in a circuit in a series configuration, and would have too large an effect on tuning or matching when placed in a circuit in a shunt configuration.


This characteristic can be exploited in one embodiment of the present disclosure whereby the largest capacitor in a switchable capacitor binary array could be switched by a semiconductor or MEMS switch that had a larger resistance than that which would be required to maintain the target Q value in the high band, but instead sized to only maintain the target Q value in the low band—see FIG. 9. Doing so would significantly reduce the die area of the switch associated with the large value capacitor, and correspondingly reduce the cost of the die. Given the approximate 2 to 1 relationship of the high band and low band frequencies, allowing the switch to be one half the size (twice the resistance) for the largest value capacitor would result in an approximate 25% savings in the die area required for the total switchable capacitor binary array, since the largest value capacitor in the binary array is approximately one half of the total capacitance in the array.


An embodiment of the present disclosure can be applied to tuning a single reactive circuit element such as an antenna or other resonant structure. In such cases, the tunable capacitor can operate in the circuit along with another reactive element such as an inductor, and in practice the circuit will be tuned in order to be resonant at the frequency of operation. By virtue of the tunable capacitance, such a circuit can be tuned over a range of frequencies.


As an example, the analysis below considers a resonant circuit containing an inductor of value L and capacitor of value C, for which the equation below describes the formula for the resonant frequency.

ωres=2πfres1/√{square root over (LC)}


As the expression shows, the resonant frequency is inversely proportional to the square root of the value of the capacitor, and when the value of the tunable capacitor is adjusted to achieve resonance at the desired frequency of operation, the value of the tunable capacitor will then be inversely proportional to the square of the desired frequency of operation. Correspondingly, at higher frequencies of operation, the capacitor will be tuned to lower values. Since the Q of the switched capacitor is an inverse function of C as was seen above, one can deduce that for each higher individual capacitor in a binary weighted array, the resistance will not need to be reduced by the same factor as the capacitance was increased. Therefore, while in order to maintain uniform Q of a tunable capacitor the switch resistance is usually cut in half (and switch die area doubled) for each doubling in capacitor size, for applications in which it is known that operating frequency is inversely proportional to the square root of the capacitance value the switch resistance can be made larger for larger capacitors in the array, thereby saving additional die area and cost.


As was shown above:






Q
=

1

2

π






fR
total


C






Substituting for f to obtain an expression for Qres at fres:







Q
res

=


1

2

π






f
res


RC


=


1

2

π






RC
/
2


π


LC



=


L


R


C









Solving for R at fres:






R
=


L


Q


C







And, if Q is maintained as fres is tuned to the frequency of operation:






R


1

C






Therefore, in order to maintain circuit Q in such an application, the total resistance for a capacitor in the array which is two times the size of another capacitor in the array need only have the resistance reduced by a factor of 1.414 (or to 71% instead of 50%). Correspondingly, in an exemplary application, for the largest capacitor in a binary array, the size of the switch may be only 1.414 times the size of the switch for the next largest capacitor in the array instead of normally being twice the size (in an application where Q is maintained uniformly across all capacitor values at a given frequency). Utilizing an array with non-uniform Q can result in a 29% reduction in the size of this switch, and by applying this principal to the entire binary array, a reduction of approximately the same percentage of the total switch area can be accomplished.


While this analysis is representative for a tuned circuit that includes a simple resonant inductor-capacitor circuit, for other circuits the resonance may not follow the exact fres=½π√{square root over (LC)} relationship. However, in general, the circuit will typically require larger capacitance values at lower frequencies of operation, and once the exact relationship is determined, the appropriate scaling factor for the switch resistances required to achieve the required Q values can be determined and applied to the switched capacitor array.


A further extension of the above embodiment is to build the switched capacitor array in a non-binary fashion. That is, to not have each capacitor (except the smallest capacitors) in the array be one-half the capacitance of another capacitor in the array, but to rather have an array which splits the tunable capacitor into different non-binary-weighted capacitors. For example, an array of ¼ pF, ½ pF, 1 pF, 1 pF, 1 pF, can have the same tuning range as the binary weighted switched capacitor array ¼ pF, ½ pF, 1 pF, 2 pF, and can also have the same minimum resolution of ¼ pF (see FIG. 21, TABLE 1 and FIG. 22, TABLE 2). However, by further exploiting the characteristic explained above and allowing the Q of each individual capacitor and switch combination to vary, further reduction in total switch die size can be accomplished, and correspondingly, further reduction in die cost can be achieved. Since in some applications as described above, as the operating frequency is increased the tunable capacitor will typically be set to lower values of capacitance, each switch connected to the array of 1 pF capacitors (in this example) can be made of different size such that the total Q is maintained in the application. By allowing each 1 pF capacitor to individually be paired with a smaller switch, and activating them in a particular order, the Q of the total capacitance being switched into the tunable circuit can be maintained up to the frequency of operation.


In another embodiment this disadvantage can be overcome by allowing the largest value capacitor in the array (in the present illustration, the 4 pF capacitor) to be connected separately from the array by way of a port in the substrate as shown in FIGS. 10-11. In this way, if the design of the tunable capacitor requires a smaller total capacitance, the largest value in the array can be left unattached from the array, thereby allowing the tunable capacitor array to achieve smaller values of capacitance than if the largest capacitor was included in the circuit. In this embodiment, a circuit designer can choose between connecting the four smallest capacitors (C1-C4) which could give a tuning range of 1 pF (the approximate off capacitance of S1-S4, i.e., 1/16+⅛+¼+½) to 4 pF (4:1 tuning), or connecting all five capacitors which can give a tuning range of 2 pF to 8 pF (4:1 tuning) as described earlier. Both choices are available on the same die. If the largest capacitor in the array were not separated from the array as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11, a designer would be limited by a minimum value of 2 pF when the array is in the “off” state—assuming the switch size of the largest capacitor followed a binary array.


One embodiment of the present disclosure can entail a single die such as shown in FIG. 12 that includes multiple tunable capacitors that can be placed onto circuit substrates which allow the tunable capacitors on the die to be connected into several different tunable matching network topologies which can be completely defined by the connecting metal patterns on the circuit substrates. It should be noted that the tuning range of each of the tunable capacitors can be controlled by a serial bus which feeds an independent decoder integrated with each tunable capacitor. These substrates can be multi-layer printed circuit boards, or multi-layer ceramic substrates and allow the die to connect to other electronic components such as fixed value capacitors and inductors which together embody the tunable matching network. Such substrates are typically very inexpensive, and as such multiple versions, embodying multiple schematic topologies can be kept in stock by a tunable matching network manufacturer, thus allowing the flexibility of quickly converting many different tunable matching network designs to production once the final design is determined.


One embodiment of the present disclosure can entail the inclusion of fixed value capacitors on the substrates which would connect in parallel with the tunable capacitors on the die to provide additional capacitor value range for the tunable matching network design. For instance, the tunable capacitor on the die may have the range of values from 1 picofarads to 5 picofarads, but by adding a fixed 2 picofarad capacitor in parallel, the effective range of the capacitor could be extended to 3 picofarads to 7 picofarads. This would reduce the tuning ratio from 5:1 to 7:3, but by extending the value provides flexibility which may be required to accomplish the matching impedances required for a specific application without changing the die which embodies the tunable capacitors.



FIG. 12 depicts a block diagram of a single die that could contain 3 tunable capacitors connected in a manner that would allow the die to be connected in either a “Tee” configuration as shown in FIGS. 13 and 16, or a “Pi” configuration as shown in FIGS. 14 and 17, or an “L” configuration as shown in FIG. 15. It should be noted that tunable capacitor 1202 of FIG. 12 could be connected in parallel or in series with either of the other tunable capacitors on the die to create a tunable capacitor with either a larger total value or smaller (respectively) while still maintaining tuning ratio of the combined capacitance. Also note that a myriad of circuit topologies could be created with the three tunable capacitors on the die, and the module substrate is all that needs to change for this single die to support all these possible topologies. For example, an external fixed capacitor can be connected in parallel to one of the tunable capacitors on the die of FIG. 16 to increase the effective value of the tunable capacitor in parallel with said fixed capacitor.


Modern wireless systems need to support multiple modes and bands of operation. There can be multiple ways to architect a radio system to support such systems. In certain cases, antenna or other tunable matching networks may be deployed in separate circuit paths. One specific example would be to separate the circuit paths by frequency range, such as low band and high band ranges. Another example would be to separate the circuit paths transmit and receive. The illustrations in FIGS. 18-20 are specific to a high band—low band separation—additional embodiments are contemplated.



FIG. 18 depicts low band and high band independent matching networks on a single die. FIG. 19 depicts an embodiment in which signal switches are integrated into the tunable matching network die to allow the matching network to be divided into two separate paths. One or both paths can include tunable matching networks. One of the switches on one side of the matching networks of FIG. 19 could be eliminated while the switch on the other port is retained, which would allow such a tuner to be placed in front of a single input switchplexer (radio) but connected to a dual feed antenna, or two separate antennas. Alternatively, the switch on one side of the matching networks of FIG. 19 could be eliminated while the switch on the other port is retained, which would allow such a tuner to be placed in front of a single input antenna but connected to a dual input switchplexer (radio).



FIG. 20 depicts an embodiment that introduces additional flexibility to the integrated circuit die which embodies this circuit by allowing it to be used in both single path architectures and dual path architectures. It should be considered that a switch in FIG. 20 could be eliminated by fixing it in one position, allowing the tunable matching network to interface to a handset front end switchplexer that was configured to have two inputs rather than just a single antenna input. It should also be considered that a switch in FIG. 20 could be eliminated by fixing it in one position, allowing the tunable matching network to interface to a handset antenna that was configured to have two inputs rather than just a single antenna input.


In sum, one embodiment of the present disclosure can entail the inclusion of additional switches on the semiconductor or MEMS die of a matching network with the function of separating the signal paths within the tunable matching network. Such an approach can allow the designer to provide for separate tunable matching networks for either the low band or high band by switching the signal path at the input and outputs of two separate tunable matching networks, diverting the signal to one or the other depending upon the frequency of operation, or any other attribute by which the two paths could be distinguished. In some instances, one of the paths could consist of a simple “through” connecting the input to the output, or a fixed matching network thereby providing a tunable matching network in one band and a fixed matching network in the other band.


Referring to FIG. 17, one embodiment of the present disclosure can entail the inclusion of additional switches on the semiconductor or MEMS die of a matching network with the function of bypassing certain sections of the tunable impedance match. Certain tunable matching networks may include sections that could include for instance a series tunable capacitor and series inductor which may provide significant impedance tuning in the low band, but introduce a high impedance in the high band and as such introduce significant insertion loss in the high band. Bypassing, or shunting around these two parts could allow the tunable matching network to have much lower loss in the high band by effectively removing those components when they are not required. Other such circuit elements or sections of circuitry could be bypassed for similar reasons in either the low band or high band, or in some cases when matching particular impedances which do not require the specific elements being bypassed. This is an example of such an application but is not intended to limit the applications of such a shunt/bypass switch for use in tunable matching networks.


Generally speaking, to maximize the performance of a tunable matching network, and also to reduce the total cost, a typical tunable matching network should be designed uniquely for a specific application, and to do so would require a unique tunable capacitor die to be designed for each application. Experience shows that in the case where the application is a tunable matching network for a cellular handset antenna, this would require significant delays in the production of such a handset, since the tunable capacitor die would not be defined until after the handset antenna design was completed which is typically toward the end of the handset design cycle. Correspondingly, it would be very difficult for a handset designer to meet what are usually very aggressive schedule targets and use a tunable matching network that required a unique tunable capacitor die due to the issues described above. The various embodiments described in the present disclosure and others contemplated by the scope of the claims below clearly overcome the disadvantages of present systems.


The illustrations of embodiments described herein are intended to provide a general understanding of the structure of various embodiments, and they are not intended to serve as a complete description of all the elements and features of apparatus and systems that might make use of the structures described herein. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. Other embodiments may be utilized and derived therefrom, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Figures are also merely representational and may not be drawn to scale. Certain proportions thereof may be exaggerated, while others may be minimized. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.


Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein, individually and/or collectively, by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept if more than one is in fact disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.

Claims
  • 1. A device comprising: a tunable array of switched capacitors comprising a plurality of capacitors coupled to a plurality of switches, each of the plurality of capacitors having a fixed capacitance value, each of the plurality of switches having a resistance associated therewith;wherein the capacitance values of the plurality of capacitors comprise a non-binary array, andwherein the array of switched capacitors is adapted to have non-uniform quality (Q) factors.
  • 2. The device of claim 1, wherein each combination of a capacitor of the plurality of capacitors and a switch of the plurality of switches has a quality (Q) factor, and the array corresponds to a plurality of combinations having different Q factors.
  • 3. The device of claim 1, wherein a first capacitor and a second capacitor of the array of switched capacitors each have a capacitance value equal to a largest capacitance value of the non-binary array.
  • 4. The device of claim 1, wherein the device comprises a matching network operating in a frequency range having a low-frequency portion and a high-frequency portion,wherein a first capacitor having a capacitance value equal to a largest capacitance value of the array is connected to a first resistance of a first switch to maintain a target quality (Q) factor for the matching network while operating in the low-frequency portion of the frequency range, and is not connected to the first resistance while the matching network is operating in the high-frequency portion of the frequency range.
  • 5. The device of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the array of switched capacitors is contained on a die.
  • 6. The device of claim 1, wherein the resistance associated with at least one switch of the plurality of switches comprises a parasitic resistance.
  • 7. The device of claim 1, wherein at least one switch of the plurality of switches comprises a semiconductor switch.
  • 8. The device of claim 1, wherein at least one switch of the plurality of switches comprises a micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) switch.
  • 9. A device comprising: a tunable array of switched capacitors comprising a plurality of capacitors coupled to a plurality of switches, each of the plurality of capacitors having a fixed capacitance value, each of the plurality of switches having a resistance associated therewith,wherein the array of switched capacitors is adapted to have non-uniform quality (Q) factors, the array of switched capacitors thereby adapted to maintain a Q factor for the array over a predetermined portion of a frequency range of the device.
  • 10. The device of claim 9, wherein each combination of a capacitor of the plurality of capacitors and a switch of the plurality of switches has a Q factor, and the array corresponds to a plurality of combinations having different Q factors.
  • 11. The device of claim 9, wherein the device comprises a matching network operating in the frequency range, the frequency range having a low-frequency portion and a high-frequency portion,wherein a first capacitor having a capacitance value equal to a largest capacitance value of the array is connected to a first resistance of a first switch to maintain a target quality (Q) factor for the matching network while operating in the low-frequency portion of the frequency range, and is not connected to the first resistance while the matching network is operating in the high-frequency portion of the frequency range.
  • 12. The device of claim 9, wherein at least a portion of the array of switched capacitors is contained on a die.
  • 13. The device of claim 9, wherein the resistance associated with at least one switch of the plurality of switches comprises a parasitic resistance.
  • 14. The device of claim 9, wherein at least one switch of the plurality of switches comprises a semiconductor switch.
  • 15. The device of claim 9, wherein at least one switch of the plurality of switches comprises a micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) switch.
  • 16. A device comprising: a tunable array of switched reactive elements comprising a plurality of reactive elements coupled to a plurality of switches, each of the plurality of reactive elements having a fixed reactance value, each of the plurality of switches having a resistance associated therewith,wherein the array of switched reactive elements is adapted to have non-uniform quality (Q) factors, the array of switched reactive elements thereby adapted to maintain a Q factor for the array over a predetermined portion of a frequency range of the device.
  • 17. The device of claim 16, wherein at least one switch of the plurality of switches comprises a semiconductor switch.
  • 18. The device of claim 16, wherein at least one switch of the plurality of switches comprises a micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) switch.
  • 19. The device of claim 16, wherein the array comprises a plurality of capacitors coupled to the plurality of switches, wherein each of the plurality of switches has a parasitic capacitance, and wherein the resistance associated with at least one switch of the plurality of switches comprises a parasitic resistance.
  • 20. The device of claim 19, wherein the device comprises a matching network operating in the frequency range, the frequency range having a low-frequency portion and a high-frequency portion,wherein a first capacitor having a capacitance value equal to a largest capacitance value of the plurality of capacitors is connected to a first resistance of a first switch to maintain a target Q factor for the matching network while operating in the low-frequency portion of the frequency range, and is not connected to the first resistance while the matching network is operating in the high-frequency portion of the frequency range.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/367,753, filed Dec. 2, 2016, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 14/332,458, filed Jul. 16, 2014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,548,716), which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/729,221, filed Mar. 22, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,803,631), which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (575)
Number Name Date Kind
2745067 True May 1956 A
3117279 Ludvigson Jan 1964 A
3160832 Beitman Dec 1964 A
3390337 Beitman Jun 1968 A
3443231 Roza May 1969 A
3509500 McNair Apr 1970 A
3571716 Hill Mar 1971 A
3590385 Sabo Jun 1971 A
3601717 Kuecken Aug 1971 A
3742279 Kupsky Jun 1973 A
3749491 Maxfield et al. Jul 1973 A
3794941 Templin Feb 1974 A
3919644 Smolka Nov 1975 A
3990024 Hou Nov 1976 A
3995237 Brunner Nov 1976 A
4186359 Kaegebein Jan 1980 A
4201960 Skutta May 1980 A
4227256 O'Keefe Oct 1980 A
4383441 Willis May 1983 A
4476578 Gaudin Oct 1984 A
4493112 Bruene Jan 1985 A
4509019 Banu et al. Apr 1985 A
4777490 Sharma Oct 1988 A
4799066 Deacon Jan 1989 A
4965607 Wilkins Oct 1990 A
4970478 Townley et al. Nov 1990 A
4980656 Duffalo Dec 1990 A
5032805 Elmer Jul 1991 A
5136478 Bruder Aug 1992 A
5142255 Chang Aug 1992 A
5177670 Shinohara Jan 1993 A
5195045 Keane Mar 1993 A
5200826 Seong Apr 1993 A
5212463 Babbitt May 1993 A
5216392 Fraser et al. Jun 1993 A
5230091 Vaisanen et al. Jul 1993 A
5243358 Sanford Sep 1993 A
5258728 Taniyoshi Nov 1993 A
5276912 Siwiak Jan 1994 A
5301358 Gaskill Apr 1994 A
5307033 Koscica Apr 1994 A
5310358 Johnson May 1994 A
5312790 Sengupta May 1994 A
5334958 Babbitt Aug 1994 A
5361403 Dent Nov 1994 A
5371473 Trinh Dec 1994 A
5409889 Das Apr 1995 A
5427988 Sengupta Jun 1995 A
5430417 Martin Jul 1995 A
5446447 Carney Aug 1995 A
5448252 Ali Sep 1995 A
5451567 Das Sep 1995 A
5451914 Stengel Sep 1995 A
5457394 McEwan Oct 1995 A
5472935 Yandrof Ski Dec 1995 A
5479139 Koscica Dec 1995 A
5486491 Sengupta Jan 1996 A
5496795 Das Mar 1996 A
5502372 Quan Mar 1996 A
5524281 Bradley Jun 1996 A
5548837 Hess et al. Aug 1996 A
5561407 Koscica Oct 1996 A
5583359 Ng et al. Dec 1996 A
5589844 Belcher et al. Dec 1996 A
5593495 Masuda Jan 1997 A
5635433 Sengupta Jun 1997 A
5635434 Sengupta Jun 1997 A
5640042 Koscica Jun 1997 A
5679624 Das Oct 1997 A
5689219 Piirainen Nov 1997 A
5693429 Sengupta Dec 1997 A
5694134 Barnes Dec 1997 A
5699071 Urakami Dec 1997 A
5721194 Yandrofski Feb 1998 A
5766697 Sengupta Jun 1998 A
5777581 Lilly Jul 1998 A
5778308 Sroka Jul 1998 A
5786727 Sigmon Jul 1998 A
5812572 King Sep 1998 A
5812943 Suzuki Sep 1998 A
5830591 Sengupta Nov 1998 A
5846893 Sengupta Dec 1998 A
5874926 Tsuru Feb 1999 A
5880635 Satoh Mar 1999 A
5886867 Chivukula Mar 1999 A
5892482 Coleman et al. Apr 1999 A
5926751 Vlahos et al. Jul 1999 A
5929717 Richardson Jul 1999 A
5940030 Hampel et al. Aug 1999 A
5963871 Zhinong Oct 1999 A
5969582 Boesch Oct 1999 A
5973568 Shapiro et al. Oct 1999 A
5982099 Barnes et al. Nov 1999 A
5990766 Zhang Nov 1999 A
6008759 Tangemann et al. Dec 1999 A
6009124 Smith Dec 1999 A
6020787 Kim Feb 2000 A
6020795 Kim Feb 2000 A
6029075 Das Feb 2000 A
6045932 Jia Apr 2000 A
6061025 Jackson May 2000 A
6064865 Kuo et al. May 2000 A
6074971 Chiu Jun 2000 A
6096127 Dimos Aug 2000 A
6100733 Dortu Aug 2000 A
6101102 Brand Aug 2000 A
6115585 Matero Sep 2000 A
6125266 Matero et al. Sep 2000 A
6133868 Butler et al. Oct 2000 A
6133883 Munson Oct 2000 A
6172385 Duncombe Jan 2001 B1
6215644 Dhuler Apr 2001 B1
6242989 Barber Jun 2001 B1
6266528 Farzaneh Jul 2001 B1
6281748 Klomsdorf et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281847 Lee Aug 2001 B1
6309895 Jaing Oct 2001 B1
6343208 Ying Jan 2002 B1
6377142 Chiu Apr 2002 B1
6377217 Zhu Apr 2002 B1
6377440 Zhu Apr 2002 B1
6384785 Kamogawa May 2002 B1
6404614 Zhu Jun 2002 B1
6408190 Ying Jun 2002 B1
6414562 Bouisse Jul 2002 B1
6415562 Donaghue Jul 2002 B1
6438360 Alberth, Jr. et al. Aug 2002 B1
6452776 Chakravorty Sep 2002 B1
6461930 Akram Oct 2002 B2
6466774 Okabe Oct 2002 B1
6492883 Liang Dec 2002 B2
6514895 Chiu Feb 2003 B1
6525630 Zhu Feb 2003 B1
6531936 Chiu Mar 2003 B1
6535076 Partridge Mar 2003 B2
6535722 Rosen Mar 2003 B1
6538603 Chen Mar 2003 B1
6556102 Sengupta Apr 2003 B1
6556814 Klomsdorf Apr 2003 B1
6570462 Edmonson May 2003 B2
6590468 du Toit Jul 2003 B2
6590541 Schultze Jul 2003 B1
6597265 Liang Jul 2003 B2
6608603 Alexopoulos Aug 2003 B2
6624786 Boyle Sep 2003 B2
6628962 Katsura et al. Sep 2003 B1
6640085 Chatzipet Ros Oct 2003 B1
6657595 Phillips Dec 2003 B1
6661638 Jackson Dec 2003 B2
6670256 Yang Dec 2003 B2
6710651 Forrester Mar 2004 B2
6724611 Mosley Apr 2004 B1
6724890 Bareis Apr 2004 B1
6737179 Sengupta May 2004 B2
6747522 Pietruszynski et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759918 Du Toit Jul 2004 B2
6765540 Toncich Jul 2004 B2
6768472 Alexopoulos Jul 2004 B2
6774077 Sengupta Aug 2004 B2
6795712 Vakilian Sep 2004 B1
6825818 Toncich Nov 2004 B2
6839028 Lee Jan 2005 B2
6845126 Dent Jan 2005 B2
6859104 Toncich Feb 2005 B2
6862432 Kim Mar 2005 B1
6864757 Du Toit Mar 2005 B2
6868260 Jagielski Mar 2005 B2
6875655 Lin Apr 2005 B2
6882245 Utsunomiya Apr 2005 B2
6888714 Shaw et al. May 2005 B2
6905989 Ellis Jun 2005 B2
6906653 Uno Jun 2005 B2
6907234 Karr Jun 2005 B2
6914487 Doyle et al. Jul 2005 B1
6920315 Wilcox et al. Jul 2005 B1
6922330 Nielsen Jul 2005 B2
6943078 Zheng Sep 2005 B1
6946847 Nishimori Sep 2005 B2
6949442 Barth Sep 2005 B2
6961368 Dent Nov 2005 B2
6964296 Memory Nov 2005 B2
6965837 Vintola Nov 2005 B2
6987493 Chen Jan 2006 B2
6993297 Smith Jan 2006 B2
6999297 Klee Feb 2006 B1
7009455 Toncich Mar 2006 B2
7071776 Forrester Jul 2006 B2
7106715 Kelton Sep 2006 B1
7107033 du Toit Sep 2006 B2
7113614 Rhoads Sep 2006 B2
7151411 Martin Dec 2006 B2
7176634 Kitamura Feb 2007 B2
7176845 Fabrega-Sanchez Feb 2007 B2
7180467 Fabrega-Sanchez Feb 2007 B2
7218186 Chen et al. May 2007 B2
7221327 Toncich May 2007 B2
7298329 Diament Nov 2007 B2
7299018 Van Rumpt Nov 2007 B2
7312118 Kiyotoshi Dec 2007 B2
7332980 Zhu Feb 2008 B2
7332981 Matsuno Feb 2008 B2
7339527 Sager Mar 2008 B2
7369828 Shamsaifar May 2008 B2
7426373 Clingman Sep 2008 B2
7427949 Channabasappa et al. Sep 2008 B2
7453405 Nishikido et al. Nov 2008 B2
7468638 Tsai Dec 2008 B1
7469129 Blaker et al. Dec 2008 B2
7528674 Kato et al. May 2009 B2
7531011 Yamasaki May 2009 B2
7535080 Zeng et al. May 2009 B2
7535312 McKinzie May 2009 B2
7539527 Jang May 2009 B2
7557507 Wu Jul 2009 B2
7567782 Liu et al. Jul 2009 B2
7596357 Nakamata Sep 2009 B2
7633355 Matsuo Dec 2009 B2
7642879 Matsuno Jan 2010 B2
7655530 Hosking Feb 2010 B2
7667663 Hsiao Feb 2010 B2
7671693 Brobston et al. Mar 2010 B2
7705692 Fukamachi et al. Apr 2010 B2
7711337 McKinzie May 2010 B2
7714676 McKinzie May 2010 B2
7714678 du Toit May 2010 B2
7728693 du Toit et al. Jun 2010 B2
7760699 Malik Jul 2010 B1
7768400 Lawrence et al. Aug 2010 B2
7786819 Ella Aug 2010 B2
7795990 du Toit Sep 2010 B2
7830320 Shamblin et al. Nov 2010 B2
7852170 McKinzie Dec 2010 B2
7856228 Lekutai et al. Dec 2010 B2
7865154 Mendolia Jan 2011 B2
7907094 Kakitsu et al. Mar 2011 B2
7917104 Manssen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7940223 Dou et al. May 2011 B2
7949309 Rofougaran et al. May 2011 B2
7969257 du Toit Jun 2011 B2
7983615 Bryce et al. Jul 2011 B2
7991363 Greene Aug 2011 B2
8008982 McKinzie Aug 2011 B2
8072285 Spears Dec 2011 B2
8112043 Knudsen et al. Feb 2012 B2
8170510 Knudsen et al. May 2012 B2
8190109 Ali et al. May 2012 B2
8204446 Scheer Jun 2012 B2
8213886 Blin Jul 2012 B2
8217731 McKinzie et al. Jul 2012 B2
8217732 McKinzie Jul 2012 B2
8299867 McKinzie Oct 2012 B2
8320850 Khlat Nov 2012 B1
8325097 Mckinzie, III et al. Dec 2012 B2
8405563 McKinzie et al. Mar 2013 B2
8421548 Spears et al. Apr 2013 B2
8432234 Manssen et al. Apr 2013 B2
8442457 Harel et al. May 2013 B2
8454882 Chan et al. Jun 2013 B2
8457569 Blin Jun 2013 B2
8472888 Manssen et al. Jun 2013 B2
8478344 Rofougaran et al. Jul 2013 B2
8543123 Moon et al. Sep 2013 B2
8543176 Daniel et al. Sep 2013 B1
8558633 Mckinzie, III Oct 2013 B2
8564381 McKinzie Oct 2013 B2
8594584 Greene et al. Nov 2013 B2
8620236 Manssen et al. Dec 2013 B2
8620246 McKinzie et al. Dec 2013 B2
8620247 McKinzie et al. Dec 2013 B2
8655286 Mendolia Feb 2014 B2
8674783 Spears et al. Mar 2014 B2
8680934 McKinzie et al. Mar 2014 B2
8693963 du Toit et al. Apr 2014 B2
8712340 Hoirup et al. Apr 2014 B2
8712348 Brobston et al. Apr 2014 B2
8773019 Pham et al. Jul 2014 B2
8774743 Ali et al. Jul 2014 B2
8787845 Manssen et al. Jul 2014 B2
8803631 Manssen Aug 2014 B2
8860525 Spears et al. Oct 2014 B2
8948889 Spears et al. Feb 2015 B2
8957742 Spears et al. Feb 2015 B2
9026062 Greene et al. May 2015 B2
9083405 Christoffersson et al. Jul 2015 B2
9119152 Blin Aug 2015 B2
9231643 Greene et al. Jan 2016 B2
9374113 Manssen et al. Jun 2016 B2
9379454 Rabe Duane et al. Jun 2016 B2
9473194 Domino et al. Oct 2016 B2
9698858 Hoirup et al. Jul 2017 B2
9742375 Manssen et al. Aug 2017 B2
9762416 Mandegaran et al. Sep 2017 B2
9768752 du Toit et al. Sep 2017 B2
9768810 Greene et al. Sep 2017 B2
9853363 Ali et al. Dec 2017 B2
20020008672 Gothard et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020030566 Bozler Mar 2002 A1
20020047154 Sowlati et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020079982 Lafleur et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020109642 Gee et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020118075 Ohwada Aug 2002 A1
20020145483 Bouisse Oct 2002 A1
20020167963 Joa-Ng Nov 2002 A1
20020183013 Auckland et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020187780 Souissi Dec 2002 A1
20020191703 Ling Dec 2002 A1
20020193088 Jung Dec 2002 A1
20030060227 Sekine Mar 2003 A1
20030071300 Yashima Apr 2003 A1
20030114124 Higuchi Jun 2003 A1
20030137464 Foti et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030142022 Ollikainen Jul 2003 A1
20030184319 Nishimori et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030193997 Dent et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030199286 du Toit Oct 2003 A1
20030210203 Phillips et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030210206 Phillips Nov 2003 A1
20030216150 Ueda Nov 2003 A1
20030232607 Le Bars Dec 2003 A1
20040009754 Smith Jan 2004 A1
20040090372 Nallo May 2004 A1
20040100341 Luetzelschwab May 2004 A1
20040125027 Rubinshteyn et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040127178 Kuffner Jul 2004 A1
20040137950 Bolin Jul 2004 A1
20040202399 Kochergin Oct 2004 A1
20040204027 Park et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040227176 York Nov 2004 A1
20040232982 Itchitsubo et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040257293 Friedrich Dec 2004 A1
20040263411 Fabrega-Sanchez et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040264610 Marro et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050007291 Fabrega-Sanchez Jan 2005 A1
20050032488 Pehlke Feb 2005 A1
20050032541 Wang Feb 2005 A1
20050042994 Otaka Feb 2005 A1
20050059362 Kalajo Mar 2005 A1
20050082636 Yashima Apr 2005 A1
20050083234 Poilasne et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050085204 Poilasne et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050093624 Forrester et al. May 2005 A1
20050130608 Forse Jun 2005 A1
20050130699 Kim Jun 2005 A1
20050145987 Okuda et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050208960 Hassan Sep 2005 A1
20050215204 Wallace Sep 2005 A1
20050227627 Cyr et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050227633 Dunko Oct 2005 A1
20050259011 Vance Nov 2005 A1
20050260962 Nazrul et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050264455 Talvitie Dec 2005 A1
20050280588 Fujikawa et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050282503 Onno Dec 2005 A1
20060003537 Sinha Jan 2006 A1
20060009165 Alles Jan 2006 A1
20060022882 Gerder et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060030277 Cyr et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060077082 Shanks et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060084392 Marholev et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060099915 Laroia et al. May 2006 A1
20060099952 Prehofer et al. May 2006 A1
20060119511 Collinson et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060148415 Hamalainen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060160501 Mendolia et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060183431 Chang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060183433 Mori et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060183442 Chang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195161 Li et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060205368 Bustamante Sep 2006 A1
20060223451 Posamentier Oct 2006 A1
20060252391 Poilasne et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060281423 Caimi Dec 2006 A1
20070001924 Hirabayashi et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070013483 Stewart Jan 2007 A1
20070035458 Ohba et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070042725 Poilasne Feb 2007 A1
20070042734 Ryu Feb 2007 A1
20070063788 Zhu Mar 2007 A1
20070077956 Julian et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070080888 Mohamadi Apr 2007 A1
20070082611 Terranova et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070085609 Itkin Apr 2007 A1
20070091006 Thober et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070093282 Chang et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070109716 Martin et al. May 2007 A1
20070111681 Alberth et al. May 2007 A1
20070121267 Kotani et al. May 2007 A1
20070142011 Shatara Jun 2007 A1
20070142014 Wilcox Jun 2007 A1
20070149146 Hwang Jun 2007 A1
20070171879 Bourque Jul 2007 A1
20070182636 Carlson Aug 2007 A1
20070184825 Lim et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070194859 Brobston Aug 2007 A1
20070197180 McKinzie et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070200766 McKinzie Aug 2007 A1
20070200773 Dou et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070210899 Kato et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070222697 Caimi et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070248238 Abreu et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070285326 McKinzie Dec 2007 A1
20070293176 Yu Dec 2007 A1
20080007478 Jung Jan 2008 A1
20080018541 Pang Jan 2008 A1
20080030165 Lisac et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051096 Rao et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080055016 Morris Mar 2008 A1
20080055168 Massey et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080081670 Rofougaran Apr 2008 A1
20080090539 Thompson Apr 2008 A1
20080090573 Kim et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080094149 Brobston Apr 2008 A1
20080106350 McKinzie May 2008 A1
20080111748 Dunn et al. May 2008 A1
20080122553 McKinzie May 2008 A1
20080122723 Rofougaran May 2008 A1
20080129612 Wang Jun 2008 A1
20080158076 Walley Jul 2008 A1
20080174508 Iwai et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080261544 Blin Oct 2008 A1
20080266190 Ohba et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080274706 Blin Nov 2008 A1
20080280570 Blin Nov 2008 A1
20080285729 Glasgow et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288028 Larson et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294718 Okano Nov 2008 A1
20080300027 Dou Dec 2008 A1
20080305749 Ben-Bassat Dec 2008 A1
20080305750 Alon et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080309617 Kong et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090002077 Rohani et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090027286 Ohishi Jan 2009 A1
20090039976 McKinzie, III Feb 2009 A1
20090051604 Zhang et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090051611 Shamblin et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090079656 Peyla et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082017 Chang et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088093 Nentwig et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090109880 Kim et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090121963 Greene May 2009 A1
20090149136 Rofougaran Jun 2009 A1
20090180403 Tudosoiu Jul 2009 A1
20090184879 Derneryd Jul 2009 A1
20090196192 Lim et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090215446 Hapsari et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090231220 Zhang et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090253385 Dent et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090264065 Song Oct 2009 A1
20090278685 Potyrailo Nov 2009 A1
20090295651 Dou et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090323572 Shi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090323582 Proctor et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100041348 Wilcox et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100053009 Rofougaran Mar 2010 A1
20100060531 Rappaport Mar 2010 A1
20100073103 Spears et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100085260 McKinzie Apr 2010 A1
20100085884 Srinivisan et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100105425 Asokan Apr 2010 A1
20100107067 Vaisanen et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100134215 Lee et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100156552 McKinzie Jun 2010 A1
20100164640 McKinzie Jul 2010 A1
20100164641 McKinzie Jul 2010 A1
20100201598 Lau et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100214189 Kanazawa Aug 2010 A1
20100232474 Rofougaran Sep 2010 A1
20100244576 Hillan et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100277363 Kainulainen et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100285836 Horihata et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100302106 Knudsen et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100304684 Duron et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100304688 Knudsen Dec 2010 A1
20100308933 See et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110002080 Ranta Jan 2011 A1
20110012790 Badaruzzaman Jan 2011 A1
20110012792 Krenz Jan 2011 A1
20110014879 Alberth et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110014886 Manssen Jan 2011 A1
20110019606 Umeda et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110026415 Kamuf et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110039504 Nguyen et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110043298 McKinzie Feb 2011 A1
20110043328 Bassali Feb 2011 A1
20110053524 Manssen Mar 2011 A1
20110063042 Mendolia Mar 2011 A1
20110086600 Muhammad et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110086630 Manssen Apr 2011 A1
20110102290 Milosavljevic May 2011 A1
20110105023 Scheer et al. May 2011 A1
20110116395 Tsuda et al. May 2011 A1
20110116423 Rousu et al. May 2011 A1
20110117863 Camp, Jr. et al. May 2011 A1
20110117973 Asrani et al. May 2011 A1
20110121079 Lawrence et al. May 2011 A1
20110122040 Wakabayashi May 2011 A1
20110133994 Korva Jun 2011 A1
20110140982 Ozden et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110183628 Baker Jul 2011 A1
20110183633 Ohba et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110195679 Lee et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110227666 Manssen Sep 2011 A1
20110237207 Bauder Sep 2011 A1
20110249760 Chrisikos et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110250852 Greene Oct 2011 A1
20110254637 Manssen Oct 2011 A1
20110254638 Manssen Oct 2011 A1
20110256857 Chen et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110281532 Shin et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110285511 Maguire et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110299438 Mikhemar Dec 2011 A1
20110306310 Bai Dec 2011 A1
20110309980 Ali et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120039189 Suzuki et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120051409 Brobston et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120062431 Tikka et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120075159 Chang Mar 2012 A1
20120084537 Indukuru Apr 2012 A1
20120094708 Park et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120099462 Yuda et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120100802 Mohebbi Apr 2012 A1
20120112851 Manssen May 2012 A1
20120112852 Manssen et al. May 2012 A1
20120112970 Mow et al. May 2012 A1
20120119843 du Toit et al. May 2012 A1
20120119844 du Toit et al. May 2012 A1
20120139810 Faraone et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120154975 Oakes Jun 2012 A1
20120214421 Hoirup Aug 2012 A1
20120220243 Mendolia Aug 2012 A1
20120243579 Premakanth An et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120286586 Balm Nov 2012 A1
20120293384 Knudsen et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120295554 Greene Nov 2012 A1
20120295555 Greene et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120309332 Liao et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130005277 Klomsdorf et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130052967 Black et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130056841 Hsieh et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130076579 Zhang et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130076580 Zhang et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130106332 Williams et al. May 2013 A1
20130122829 Hyvonen et al. May 2013 A1
20130137384 Desclos et al. May 2013 A1
20130154897 Sorensen et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130182583 Siomina et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130194054 Presti Aug 2013 A1
20130215846 Yerrabommanahalli et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130231155 Sheynman et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130265912 Ikonen et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130293425 Zhu et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130315285 Black et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140002323 Ali et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140009360 Ikonen et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140128032 Muthukumar et al. May 2014 A1
20140162572 Hirabayashi Jun 2014 A1
20140210686 Ali et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140287698 Ali et al. Sep 2014 A1
20160173172 Greene Jun 2016 A1
20160241276 Zhu Aug 2016 A1
20160269055 Greene et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160277129 Manssen Sep 2016 A1
20160322991 McKinzie Nov 2016 A1
20160336916 Du Toit et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160352408 Greene Dec 2016 A1
20160373146 Manssen et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170011858 Oakes et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170085244 Manssen et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170264322 Greene et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170264335 Hoirup et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170294712 Greene Oct 2017 A1
20170294891 McKinzie, III Oct 2017 A1
20180083657 Manssen et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180109235 McKinzie et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180198482 Hoirup et al. Jul 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (45)
Number Date Country
2914562 Jun 2016 CA
101640949 Feb 2010 CN
201765685 Mar 2011 CN
105703797 Jun 2016 CN
19614655 Oct 1997 DE
10258805 Mar 2005 DE
102008050743 Apr 2010 DE
102009018648 Oct 2010 DE
0909024 Apr 1999 EM
0685936 Jun 1995 EP
0909024 Apr 1999 EP
1079296 Feb 2001 EP
1137192 Sep 2001 EP
1298810 Apr 2006 EP
2214085 Aug 2010 EP
2328233 Jun 2011 EP
2388925 Nov 2011 EP
2424119 Feb 2012 EP
2638640 Jul 2014 EP
3131157 Feb 2017 EP
03276901 Mar 1990 JP
02-077580 Sep 1991 JP
9321526 Dec 1997 JP
10209722 Aug 1998 JP
2000124066 Apr 2000 JP
2005-130441 May 2005 JP
100645526 Nov 2006 KR
10-0740177 Jul 2007 KR
2001071846 Sep 2001 WO
2006031170 Mar 2006 WO
2008030165 Mar 2008 WO
2009064968 May 2009 WO
2009108391 Sep 2009 WO
2009155966 Dec 2009 WO
2010028521 Mar 2010 WO
2010121914 Oct 2010 WO
2011044592 Apr 2011 WO
2011084716 Jul 2011 WO
2011084716 Jul 2011 WO
2011102143 Aug 2011 WO
2011133657 Oct 2011 WO
2011028453 Oct 2011 WO
2012067622 May 2012 WO
2012085932 Jun 2012 WO
2012085932 Jun 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (49)
Entry
Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2018, application No. 2826573, 4 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued by the European Patent Office, dated Nov. 16, 2017. European Patent Application 12177197.6.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 10822849.5, dated Oct. 11, 2017, 5 pages.
Canadian Office Action, Application No. 2,821,173, dated Oct. 17, 2016.
Extended European Search Report for 12749235.3 dated Jun. 8, 2017.
“European Search Report”, 16151299.1 search report, dated 2016.
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 16155235.1, dated May 3, 2016.
“Office Action Received in China Patent Application 201080045689.X”, dated Mar. 4, 2016, 6 pages.
“Search Report”, ROC (Taiwan) Patent Application No. 101117467, English Translation, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 1 page.
Bezooijen, A. et al., “A GSM/EDGE/WCDMA Adaptive Series-LC Matching Network Using RF-MEMS Switches”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 2008, 2259-2268.
Canadian IPO, “Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2017”, Mar. 10, 2017, 1-3.
Du Toit “Tunable Microwave Devices With Auto Adjusting Matching Circuit”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,617; filed Nov. 22, 2011.
Du Toit “Tunable Microwave Devices With Auto-Adjusting Matching Circuit”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,649; filed Nov. 22, 2011.
Eiji, N. , “High-Frequency Circuit and Its Manufacture”, Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 1998, No. 13, Nov. 30, 1998 & JP 10 209722 A (Seiko Epson Corp), Aug. 7, 1998.
EPO, , “Extended European Search Report”, 1-9.
EPO, , “Extended European Search Report, EP16188956.3,”, dated Jan. 9, 2017, 1-9.
Greene, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,463; filed May 16, 2011.
Greene, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,589; filed May 16, 2011.
Hoirup, , “Method and Apparatus for Radio Antenna Frequency Tuning”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,177; filed Feb. 18, 2011.
Huang, Libo et al., “Theoretical and experimental investigation of adaptive antenna impedance matching for multiband mobile phone applications”, IEEE, Sep. 7, 2005, 13-17.
Hyun, S. , “Effects of strain on the dielectric properties of tunable dielectric SrTi03 thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 2, Jul. 9, 2001.
Ida, I. et al., “An Adaptive Impedence Matching System and Its Application to Mobile Antennas”, TENCON 2004, IEEE Region 10 Conference, See Abstract ad p. 544, Nov. 21-24, 2004, 543-547.
Katsuya, K. , “Hybrid Integrated Circuit Device”, Patent Abstracts of Japan, Publication No. 03-276901, Date of publication of application: Sep. 12, 1991.
Manssen, , “Method and Apparatus for Managing Interference in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/326,206; filed Apr. 20, 2010.
Manssen, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/941,972; filed Nov. 8, 2010.
Manssen, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/005,122; filed Jan. 12, 2011.
McKinzie, , “Adaptive Impedance Matching Module (AIMM) Control Architectures”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,544; filed Nov. 10, 2011.
McKinzie, , “Adaptive Impedance Matching Module (AIMM) Control Architectures”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,550; filed Nov. 10, 2011.
McKinzie, , “Method and Apparatus for Adaptive Impedance Matching”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/217,748; filed Aug. 25, 2011.
Mendolia, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/035,417; filed Feb. 25, 2011.
Paratek Microwave, Inc., , “Method and Appartus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, International Application No. PCT/US11/59620; Filed Nov. 7, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/046241, dated Mar. 2, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/056413, dated Jul. 27, 2011.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Nov. 16, 2011, International Application No. PCT/US/2011/038543.
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT Application No. PCT/US08/005085, dated Jul. 2, 2008.
Payandehjoo, Kasra et al., “Investigation of Parasitic Elements for Coupling Reduction in MultiAntenna Hand-Set Devices”, Published online Jan. 22, 2013 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
Pervez, N.K. , “High Tunability barium strontium titanate thin films for RF circuit applications”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 19, Nov. 8, 2004.
Petit, Laurent , “MEMS-Switched Parasitic-Antenna Array for Radiation Pattern Diversity”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2009, 2624-2631.
Qiao, et al., “Antenna Impedance Mismatch Measurement and Correction for Adaptive COMA Transceivers”, IEEE, Jan. 2005.
Qiao, et al., “Measurement of Antenna Load Impedance for Power Amplifiers”, The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, Sep. 13, 2004.
Spears, , “Methods for Tuning an Adaptive Impedance Matching Network With a Look-Up Table”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,951; filed Nov. 16, 2011.
Stemmer, Susanne , “Low-loss tunable capacitors fabricated directly on gold bottom electrodes”, Applied Physics Letters 88, 112905, Mar. 15, 2006.
Taylor, T.R. , “Impact of thermal strain on the dielectric constant of sputtered barium strontium titanate thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 11, Mar. 18, 2002.
Tombak, Ali , “Tunable Barium Strontium Titanate Thin Film Capacitors for RF and Microwave Applications”, IEEE Microwave and Wireles Components Letters, vol. 12, Jan. 2002.
Xu, Hongtao , “Tunable Microwave Integrated Circuits using BST Thin Film Capacitors with Device”, Integrated Ferroelectrics, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, University of California, 2005, Apr. 2005.
Zuo, S. , “Eigenmode Decoupling for MIMO Loop-Antenna Based on 180 Coupler”, Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, vol. 26, Aug. 2011, 11-20.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, EPO application No. 16151299.1, dated Jun. 22, 2018.
India, Patent O., “Examination Report”, for Application No. 9844/DELNP/2013, dated Apr. 25, 2018, 5 pages.
Intellectual Property India, “First Examination Report”, for Application No. 3160/CHE/2013 dated Jun. 5, 2018, Jun. 5, 2018, 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170373661 A1 Dec 2017 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15367753 Dec 2016 US
Child 15673613 US
Parent 14332458 Jul 2014 US
Child 15367753 US
Parent 12729221 Mar 2010 US
Child 14332458 US