Standard groups and companies have been actively searching for potential needs for standardization of future video coding technology. These standard groups and companies have focused on artificial intelligence (AI)-based end-to-end neural image compression (NIC) using deep neural networks (DNNs). The success of this approach has brought more and more industrial interest in advanced neural image and video compression methodologies.
Typically, a pre-trained NIC model instance is computed by using a set of training data, assuming that the training data covers the entire data distribution of all natural images and an universal model instance with pre-trained fixed model parameters can be obtained to work on all natural images. This assumption is not true in practice. Real natural images have various data distributions, and a pre-trained NIC model can only work well on a subset of images normally. It is highly desired that an NIC model can adaptively select its model parameters to accommodate different input images.
According to embodiments, a method of adaptive neural image compression with a hyperprior model by meta-learning is performed by at least one processor and includes generating a statistic feature, based on an input image and a hyperparameter, and generating a first shared feature and an estimated adaptive encoding parameter, encoding the input image to obtain a signal encoded image, based on the generated first shared feature and the generated estimated adaptive encoding parameter, generating a second shared feature and an estimated adaptive hyper encoding parameter, generating a hyper feature, based on the obtained signal encoded image, the generated second shared feature, and the generated estimated adaptive hyper encoding parameter, and compressing the obtained signal encoded image, the generated statistic feature, and the generated hyper feature. The method further includes decoding the compressed signal encoded image to obtain a recovered image, the compressed statistic feature to obtain a recovered statistic feature, and the compressed hyper feature to obtain a recovered hyper feature, generating a third shared feature and an estimated adaptive hyper decoding parameter, generating a hyper prior feature, based on the recovered statistic feature, the generated third shared feature, and the estimated adaptive hyper decoding parameter; and generating a reconstructed image, based on the generated hyper prior feature and the obtained recovered image.
According to embodiments, an apparatus for adaptive neural image compression with a hyperprior model by meta-learning includes at least one memory configured to store program code, and at least one processor configured to read the program code and operate as instructed by the program code, the program code including statistic feature generating code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a statistic feature, based on an input image and a hyperparameter, a first shared feature generating code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a first shared feature, an adaptive encoding code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate an estimated adaptive encoding parameter, encoding code configured to cause the at least one processor to encode the input image to obtain a signal encoded image, based on the first shared feature and the estimated adaptive encoding parameter, a second shared feature generating code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a second shared feature, adaptive hyper encoding code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate an estimated adaptive hyper encoding parameter, a hyper feature generating code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a hyper feature, based on the obtained signal encoded image, the second shared feature, and the estimated adaptive hyper encoding parameter, and compression code configured to cause the at least one processor to compress the obtained signal encoded image, the generated statistic feature, and the generated hyper feature. The program code further includes decoding code configured to cause the at least one processor to decode the compressed image to obtain a recovered image, the compressed statistic feature to obtain a recovered statistic feature, and the compressed hyper feature to obtain a recovered hyper feature, a third shared feature generating code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a third shared feature, adaptive hyper decoding code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate an estimated adaptive hyper decoding parameter, a hyper prior feature generating code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a hyper prior feature, based on the recovered statistic feature, the third shared feature, and the estimated adaptive hyper decoding parameter, and reconstruction code configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a reconstructed image, based on the generated hyper prior feature and the recovered image.
According to embodiments, a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by at least one processor generate a statistic feature, based on an input image and a hyperparameter, generate a first shared feature, generate an estimated adaptive encoding parameter, encode the input image to obtain a signal encoded image, based on the first shared feature and the estimated adaptive encoding parameter, generate a second shared feature, generate an estimated adaptive hyper encoding parameter, generate a hyper feature, based on the obtained signal encoded image, the second shared feature, and the estimated adaptive hyper encoding parameter, compress the obtained signal encoded image, the generated statistic feature, and the generated hyper feature, decode the compressed signal encoded image to obtain a recovered image, the compressed statistic feature to obtain a recovered statistic feature, and the compressed hyper feature to obtain a recovered hyper feature, generate a third shared feature, generate an estimated adaptive hyper decoding parameter, generate a hyper prior feature, based on the recovered statistic feature, the generated third shared feature, and the generated estimated adaptive hyper decoding parameter, and generate a reconstructed image, based on the generated hyper prior feature and the recovered image.
This disclosure describes a method and an apparatus for an adaptive neural image compression (Ada-NIC) framework that automatically and adaptively selects the optimal model parameters for compressing an image based on the characteristics of the individual input image. The meta learning mechanism is used to automatically compute the adaptive weight parameters of the underlying NIC model based on the current input image.
As shown in
The user device 110 includes one or more devices capable of receiving, generating, storing, processing, and/or providing information associated with platform 120. For example, the user device 110 may include a computing device (e.g., a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a tablet computer, a handheld computer, a smart speaker, a server, etc.), a mobile phone (e.g., a smart phone, a radiotelephone, etc.), a wearable device (e.g., a pair of smart glasses or a smart watch), or a similar device. In some implementations, the user device 110 may receive information from and/or transmit information to the platform 120.
The platform 120 includes one or more devices as described elsewhere herein. In some implementations, the platform 120 may include a cloud server or a group of cloud servers. In some implementations, the platform 120 may be designed to be modular such that software components may be swapped in or out. As such, the platform 120 may be easily and/or quickly reconfigured for different uses.
In some implementations, as shown, the platform 120 may be hosted in a cloud computing environment 122. Notably, while implementations described herein describe the platform 120 as being hosted in the cloud computing environment 122, in some implementations, the platform 120 may not be cloud-based (i.e., may be implemented outside of a cloud computing environment) or may be partially cloud-based.
The cloud computing environment 122 includes an environment that hosts the platform 120. The cloud computing environment 122 may provide computation, software, data access, storage, etc. services that do not require end-user (e.g., the user device 110) knowledge of a physical location and configuration of system(s) and/or device(s) that hosts the platform 120. As shown, the cloud computing environment 122 may include a group of computing resources 124 (referred to collectively as “computing resources 124” and individually as “computing resource 124”).
The computing resource 124 includes one or more personal computers, workstation computers, server devices, or other types of computation and/or communication devices. In some implementations, the computing resource 124 may host the platform 120. The cloud resources may include compute instances executing in the computing resource 124, storage devices provided in the computing resource 124, data transfer devices provided by the computing resource 124, etc. In some implementations, the computing resource 124 may communicate with other computing resources 124 via wired connections, wireless connections, or a combination of wired and wireless connections.
As further shown in
The application 124-1 includes one or more software applications that may be provided to or accessed by the user device 110 and/or the platform 120. The application 124-1 may eliminate a need to install and execute the software applications on the user device 110. For example, the application 124-1 may include software associated with the platform 120 and/or any other software capable of being provided via the cloud computing environment 122. In some implementations, one application 124-1 may send/receive information to/from one or more other applications 124-1, via the virtual machine 124-2.
The virtual machine 124-2 includes a software implementation of a machine (e.g., a computer) that executes programs like a physical machine. The virtual machine 124-2 may be either a system virtual machine or a process virtual machine, depending upon use and degree of correspondence to any real machine by the virtual machine 124-2. A system virtual machine may provide a complete system platform that supports execution of a complete operating system (“OS”). A process virtual machine may execute a single program, and may support a single process. In some implementations, the virtual machine 124-2 may execute on behalf of a user (e.g., the user device 110), and may manage infrastructure of the cloud computing environment 122, such as data management, synchronization, or long-duration data transfers.
The virtualized storage 124-3 includes one or more storage systems and/or one or more devices that use virtualization techniques within the storage systems or devices of the computing resource 124. In some implementations, within the context of a storage system, types of virtualizations may include block virtualization and file virtualization. Block virtualization may refer to abstraction (or separation) of logical storage from physical storage so that the storage system may be accessed without regard to physical storage or heterogeneous structure. The separation may permit administrators of the storage system flexibility in how the administrators manage storage for end users. File virtualization may eliminate dependencies between data accessed at a file level and a location where files are physically stored. This may enable optimization of storage use, server consolidation, and/or performance of non-disruptive file migrations.
The hypervisor 124-4 may provide hardware virtualization techniques that allow multiple operating systems (e.g., “guest operating systems”) to execute concurrently on a host computer, such as the computing resource 124. The hypervisor 124-4 may present a virtual operating platform to the guest operating systems, and may manage the execution of the guest operating systems. Multiple instances of a variety of operating systems may share virtualized hardware resources.
The network 130 includes one or more wired and/or wireless networks. For example, the network 130 may include a cellular network (e.g., a fifth generation (5G) network, a long-term evolution (LTE) network, a third generation (3G) network, a code division multiple access (CDMA) network, etc.), a public land mobile network (PLMN), a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a metropolitan area network (MAN), a telephone network (e.g., the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN)), a private network, an ad hoc network, an intranet, the Internet, a fiber optic-based network, or the like, and/or a combination of these or other types of networks.
The number and arrangement of devices and networks shown in
A device 200 may correspond to the user device 110 and/or the platform 120. As shown in
The bus 210 includes a component that permits communication among the components of the device 200. The processor 220 is implemented in hardware, firmware, or a combination of hardware and software. The processor 220 is a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), an accelerated processing unit (APU), a microprocessor, a microcontroller, a digital signal processor (DSP), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or another type of processing component. In some implementations, the processor 220 includes one or more processors capable of being programmed to perform a function. The memory 230 includes a random access memory (RAM), a read only memory (ROM), and/or another type of dynamic or static storage device (e.g., a flash memory, a magnetic memory, and/or an optical memory) that stores information and/or instructions for use by the processor 220.
The storage component 240 stores information and/or software related to the operation and use of the device 200. For example, the storage component 240 may include a hard disk (e.g., a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optic disk, and/or a solid state disk), a compact disc (CD), a digital versatile disc (DVD), a floppy disk, a cartridge, a magnetic tape, and/or another type of non-transitory computer-readable medium, along with a corresponding drive.
The input component 250 includes a component that permits the device 200 to receive information, such as via user input (e.g., a touch screen display, a keyboard, a keypad, a mouse, a button, a switch, and/or a microphone). Additionally, or alternatively, the input component 250 may include a sensor for sensing information (e.g., a global positioning system (GPS) component, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, and/or an actuator). The output component 260 includes a component that provides output information from the device 200 (e.g., a display, a speaker, and/or one or more light-emitting diodes (LEDs)).
The communication interface 270 includes a transceiver-like component (e.g., a transceiver and/or a separate receiver and transmitter) that enables the device 200 to communicate with other devices, such as via a wired connection, a wireless connection, or a combination of wired and wireless connections. The communication interface 270 may permit the device 200 to receive information from another device and/or provide information to another device. For example, the communication interface 270 may include an Ethernet interface, an optical interface, a coaxial interface, an infrared interface, a radio frequency (RF) interface, a universal serial bus (USB) interface, a Wi-Fi interface, a cellular network interface, or the like.
The device 200 may perform one or more processes described herein. The device 200 may perform these processes in response to the processor 220 executing software instructions stored by a non-transitory computer-readable medium, such as the memory 230 and/or the storage component 240. A computer-readable medium is defined herein as a non-transitory memory device. A memory device includes memory space within a single physical storage device or memory space spread across multiple physical storage devices.
Software instructions may be read into the memory 230 and/or the storage component 240 from another computer-readable medium or from another device via the communication interface 270. When executed, software instructions stored in the memory 230 and/or the storage component 240 may cause the processor 220 to perform one or more processes described herein. Additionally, or alternatively, hardwired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to perform one or more processes described herein. Thus, implementations described herein are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
The number and arrangement of components shown in
A method and an apparatus for Adaptive Neural Image Compression (Ada-NIC) with adaptive model parameter selection by meta-learning will now be described in detail.
This disclosure proposes an Ada-NIC framework that supports adaptive model parameter selection. The meta-learning mechanism is used to automatically compute the adaptive weight parameters of the underlying NIC model based on the current input image, so that the Ada-NIC model can improve compression of the image.
As shown in
Given an input image x of size (h, w, c), where h, w, c are the height, width, and number of channels, respectively, the target of the test stage of an NIC workflow can be described as follows. A compressed representation that is compact for storage and transmission is computed. Then, based on this compressed representation
L=λD(x,
Training with a large hyperparameter λ results in compression models with smaller distortion but more bit consumption, and vice versa.
The model parameters of the underlying NIC encoder and decoder are separated into 8 parts, θse, θae, θsd, θad, ωse, ωae, ωsd, ωad, denoting shared signal encoding parameters (SSEP) 401, adaptive signal encoding parameters (ASEP) 402, shared signal decoding parameters (SSDP) 432, and adaptive signal decoding parameters (ASDP) 431, shared hyper encoding parameters (SHEP) 411, adaptive hyper encoding parameters (AHEP) 412, shared hyper decoding parameters (SHDP) 422, and adaptive hyper decoding parameters (AHDP) 421, respectively. In the embodiments of the NIC network architecture, the SSEP 401, ASEP 402, SHEP 411, AHEP 412, AHDP 421, SHDP 422, ASDP 431, and SSDP 432 are separate individual NN modules, each comprising one or multiple NN layers. These individual modules are connected to each other sequentially for network forward computation.
There may also be a parameter split within NN layers. Let θse(i), θae(i) denote the SSEP and ASEP for the i-th layer of the NIC signal encoder 400. Let ωse(i), ωae(i) denote the SHEP and AHEP for the i-th layer of the NIC hyper encoder 410. Let ωad(j), ωsd(j) denote the AHDP and SHDP for the j-th layer of the NIC hyper decoder 420. Let θad(j), θsd(j) denote the ASDP and SSDP for the j-th layer of the NIC signal decoder 430. The network computes the inference outputs based on the corresponding inputs for the SSEP and ASEP, or the SHEP and AHEP, or the AHDP and SHDP, or the ASDP and SSDP, respectively. These outputs are combined (e.g., by addition, concatenation, multiplication, etc.) and then sent to the next layer of the NIC module. The output of a layer is the input to the next layer.
The flow diagram of
Specifically, with reference to
The ASEP Prediction module 512 is a NN, e.g., comprising of convolution and fully connected layers, which predicts an updated ASEP {circumflex over (θ)}ae(i) based on the original ASEP θae(i), the current input, the statistic feature μ, and the hyperparameter λ. In some embodiments, the input f(i) is used as input to the ASEP Prediction module 512. In some other embodiments, the shared feature g(i) is used as input to the ASEP Prediction module 512 instead of the input f(i). In other embodiments, an SSEP loss (not shown in
It is noted that the workflow described in
Assume there are a total of NS layers for the Meta-Signal Encoding NN 510, then the output of the last layer is the latent representation y. Then the latent representation y is passed through a Meta-Hyper Encoding module 320 to compute a hyper feature z.
The AHEP Prediction module 620 is a NN, e.g., comprising of convolution and fully connected layers, which predicts the updated AHEP {circumflex over (ω)}ae(i) based on the original AHEP ωae(i), the current input, the statistic feature μ, and the hyperparameter λ. In some embodiments, h(i) is used as input to the AHEP Prediction module 620. In some other embodiments, the shared feature p(i) is used as input to the AHEP Prediction module 620 instead of the input h(i). In other embodiments, an SHEP loss (not shown in
Assume there are a total of NH layers for the Meta-Hyper Encoding NN 600, then the output of the last layer is the hyper feature z. Then latent representation y is passed through a Signal Q & AE module 330 to be further compressed (through quantization and arithmetic entropy coding) into a compact representation y′. The statistic feature μ is passed through a Meta Q & AE module 332 to generate a compact meta feature μ′. The hyper feature z is passed through a Hyper Q & AE module 331 to generate a compact hyper feature z′. The compact representation y′, compact meta feature μ′, and compact hyper feature z′, as well as hyperparameter λ, are then sent to the decoder (as shown in
On the decoder side, the received compact representation y′ is passed through a Signal AD & DQ module 340 to compute a recovered latent representation
Then the hyper feature
Assume there are a total of MH layers for the Meta-Hyper Decoding NN 700, then the output of the last layer is the hyper prior feature
Assume there are a total of MS layers for the Meta-Signal Decoding NN 800, then the output of the last layer is the reconstructed image
The training process aims at learning the SSEP θse(i) and the ASEP θae(i), i=1, . . . , NS for the Meta-Signal Encoding NN 510, the SHEP of ωse(i) and the AHEP ωae(i), i=1, . . . , NH for the Meta-Hyper Encoding NN 600, the SHDP ωsd(j) and the AHDP ωad(j), j=1, . . . , MH for the Meta-Hyper Decoding NN 700, the SSDP θsd(j) and ASDP θad(j), j=1, . . . , MS for the Meta-Signal Decoding NN 800, as well as the ASEP Prediction NN (model parameters denoted as ΦSe), the AHEP Prediction NN (model parameters denoted as ΦHe), the ASDP Prediction NN (model parameters denoted as ΦSd), and the AHDP Prediction NN (model parameters denoted as ΦHd).
In the embodiments, a Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) mechanism is used for the training purposes.
Specifically, for training, there is a set of training data Dtr(πi), i=1, . . . , K, where each Dtr(πi) corresponds to a training data distribution πi, and there are K training data distributions in total. Note that this is a general notation, since each training data can be treated as an individual distribution and K will be the same as the size of the entire training set. In addition, there is a set of validation data Dval(πj), j=1, . . . , P, where each Dval(πj) corresponds to a validation data distribution πj. The validation data distributions include the data distributions in the training set. The validation data distributions may also include data distributions not included in the training set.
The goal of the training process is to learn the Ada-NIC model so that it can be broadly applied to all (including training and future unseen) data distributions, under the assumption that the NIC task with a target data distribution is drawn from a task distribution P(πj). To achieve this, the loss for learning the Ada-NIC model is minimized across all training data sets across all training data distributions.
Let Θs={θse, θsd, ωse, ωsd)} include all shared model parameters, and let Θa={θae, θad, ωae, ωad} include all adaptive model parameters. Let Φe={ΦSe, ΦHe} include all the prediction model parameters on the encoder side (400, 410), and let Φd={ΦSd, ΦHd} include all the prediction model parameters on the decoder side (420, 430). The MAML training process 900 has an outer loop and an inner loop for gradient-based parameter updates. For each outer loop iteration, in the Task Sampling module 910, a set of K′ training data distributions (K′≤K) is first sampled. Then, for each sampled training data distribution πi, a set of training data {tilde over (D)}tr(πi) from Dtr(πi) is sampled. A set of P′ (P′≤P) validation data distributions is also sampled. For each sampled validation πj, a set of validation data {tilde over (D)}val(πj) from Dval(πj) is sampled. Then, for each sampled datum x∈{tilde over (D)}tr(πi), the Ada-NIC forward computation based on the current parameters Θs, Θa, Φe and Φd, is conducted. The accumulated inner-loop loss L{tilde over (D)}
L{tilde over (D)}
The loss function L(x, Θs, Θa, Φe, Φd, πi) comprises of the R-D loss described in Equation (1) and other regularization losses (e.g., auxiliary loss of distinguishing the intermediate network output targeting at different trade-offs). Then, based on L{tilde over (D)}
{circumflex over (Θ)}a=Θa−Σi=1K′αai∇Θ
{circumflex over (Θ)}s=Θs−Σi=1K′αsi∇Θ
The gradient ∇Θ
Then an outer meta objective can be computed over all sampled validation data distributions in the Compute Meta Loss module 940 according to Equations (5) and (6):
L(Θs,Θa,Φe,Φd)=Σj=1P′L{tilde over (D)}
L{tilde over (D)}
where L(x, {circumflex over (Θ)}s, {umlaut over (Θ)}a, Φs, Φa, πj) is the loss computed for input x based on the Ada-NIC forward computation using parameters {circumflex over (Θ)}s,{circumflex over (Θ)}a, Φs, Φa.
Given step size βaj and βsj as hyperparameters for πj, the model parameters in the Meta Update module 950 are updated according to Equations (7) and (8):
Θa=Θa−Σj=1P′βaj∇Θ
Θs=Θs−Σj=1P′βsj∇Θ
In some embodiments, Θs may not be updated in the inner loop, i.e., αsi=0, {circumflex over (Θ)}s=Θs. This may help to stabilize the training process.
As for parameters Φe, Φd of the ASEP Prediction NN, AHEP Prediction NN, the ASDP prediction NN 820, and the AHDP Prediction NN 720, they are updated in a regular training manner in the Weight Update module 960. That is, according to the training and validation data Dtr(πi), i=1, . . . , K, Dval(πj), j=1, . . . , P, based on the current Θs,Θa, Φe, Φd, the loss L(x, Θs, Θa, Φe, Φd, πi) may be computed for all samples x∈Dtr(πi) and L(x, Θs, Θa, Φe, Φd, πj) for all samples x∈Dval(πj). The gradients of all these losses can be accumulated (e.g. added up) to perform parameter updates over Φe, Φd through regular back-propagation.
Note that this disclosure does not put any restrictions on the specific optimization algorithm or loss functions for updating these model parameters.
For the special case, where the ASEP Prediction module 512, the AHEP Prediction module 620, the ASDP prediction module 820 and the AHDP prediction module of the Ada-NIC model only perform prediction over the pre-defined set of training data distributions, the validation data distribution will be the same with the training ones. The same MAML training procedure can be used to train this reduced Ada-NIC model.
In some implementations, one or more process blocks of
As shown in
In operation 1001, the method of
In operation 1002, the method of
In operation 1003, the method of
In operation 1004, the method of
In operation 1005, the method of
In operation 1006, the method of
In operation 1007, the method of
In operation 1008, the method of
In operation 1009, the method of
Although
According to the embodiments, the flowchart method shown in
As shown in
The statistic feature generating code 1100 is configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a statistic feature based on an input image and a hyperparameter.
The first shared feature generating code 1101 is configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a first shared feature.
The adaptive encoding code 1102 is configured to cause the at least one processor to generate an estimated adaptive encoding parameter.
The encoding code 1103 is configured to cause the at least one processor to encode the input image to obtain a signal encoded image, based on the generated first shared feature and the generated estimated adaptive encoding parameter.
The second shared feature generating code 1104 is configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a second shared feature.
The adaptive hyper encoding code 1105 configured to cause the at least one processor to generate an estimated adaptive hyper encoding parameter.
The hyper feature generating code 1106 is configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a hyper feature based on the obtained signal encoded image, the generated second shared feature, and the generated estimated adaptive hyper encoding parameter.
The compression code 1107 is configured to cause the at least one processor to compress the obtained the signal encoded image, the generated statistic feature, and the hyper feature.
The decoding code 1108 configured to cause the at least one processor to decode the compressed signal encoded image to obtain a recovered image, the compressed statistic feature to obtain a recovered statistic feature, and the compressed hyper feature to obtain a recovered hyper feature.
The third shared feature generating code 1109 configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a third shared feature.
The adaptive hyper decoding code 1110 configured to cause the at least one processor to generate an estimated adaptive hyper decoding parameter.
The hyper prior feature generating code 1111 configured to cause the at least one processor to generate a hyper prior feature based on the recovered statistic feature, the generated third shared feature, and the generated estimated adaptive hyper decoding parameter.
The reconstruction code configured 1112 to cause the at least one processor to generate a reconstructed image based on the hyper prior feature and the recovered image.
Although
The embodiments describe automatic adaptive NIC according to the characteristics of the input image. The benefits of this include supporting both flexible model parameter prediction for arbitrary smooth data distributions and pre-trained model selection. Further, the embodiments include a flexible and general framework that accommodates various underlying NIC models, structures, and meta-learning methods.
The proposed methods may be used separately or combined in any order. Further, each of the methods (or embodiments), encoder, and decoder may be implemented by processing circuitry (e.g., one or more processors or one or more integrated circuits). In one example, the one or more processors execute a program that is stored in a non-transitory computer-readable medium.
The foregoing disclosure provides illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the implementations to the precise form disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above disclosure or may be acquired from practice of the implementations.
As used herein, the term component is intended to be broadly construed as hardware, firmware, or a combination of hardware and software.
It will be apparent that systems and/or methods, described herein, may be implemented in different forms of hardware, firmware, or a combination of hardware and software. The actual specialized control hardware or software code used to implement these systems and/or methods is not limiting of the implementations. Thus, the operation and behavior of the systems and/or methods were described herein without reference to specific software code—it being understood that software and hardware may be designed to implement the systems and/or methods based on the description herein.
Even though combinations of features are recited in the claims and/or disclosed in the specification, these combinations are not intended to limit the disclosure of possible implementations. In fact, many of these features may be combined in ways not specifically recited in the claims and/or disclosed in the specification. Although each dependent claim listed below may directly depend on only one claim, the disclosure of possible implementations includes each dependent claim in combination with every other claim in the claim set.
No element, act, or instruction used herein may be construed as critical or essential unless explicitly described as such. Also, as used herein, the articles “a” and “an” are intended to include one or more items, and may be used interchangeably with “one or more.” Furthermore, as used herein, the term “set” is intended to include one or more items (e.g., related items, unrelated items, a combination of related and unrelated items, etc.), and may be used interchangeably with “one or more.” Where only one item is intended, the term “one” or similar language is used. Also, as used herein, the terms “has,” “have,” “having,” or the like are intended to be open-ended terms. Further, the phrase “based on” is intended to mean “based, at least in part, on” unless explicitly stated otherwise.
This application is based on and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/161,216, filed on Mar. 15, 2021, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20050066075 | Kecman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20200027247 | Minnen | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200051260 | Shen | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200082270 | Gu | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200160565 | Ma | May 2020 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Content Adaptive Optimization for Neural Image Compression. Campos et al. (Year: 2019). |
Deep Learning with Adaptive Hyper-parameters for Low-Dose CT Image Reconstruction. Ding et al. (Year: 2021). |
Bayesian Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning. Yoon et al., (Year: 2018). |
International Search Report dated Nov. 8, 2021 in Application No. PCT/US2021/044896. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Nov. 8, 2021 in Application No. PCT/US2021/044896. |
Joaquim Campos et al., “Content Adaptive Optimization for Neural Image Compression”, Jun. 5, 2019, arXiv:1906.01223v2, 5 pages. |
Jaesik Yoon et al., “Bayesian Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning”, Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Dec. 2018, pp. 1-11 (11 pages). |
Qiaoqia Ding et al., “Deep Learning with Adaptive Hyper-parameters for Low-Dose CT Image Reconstruction”, Feb. 17, 2021, arXiv:2008.04656v2, pp. 1-17, (17 pages). |
Johannes Balle et al., “Variational Image Compression with a Scale Hyperprior”, May 1, 2018, arXiv:1802.01436v2, pp. 1-23 (23 pages). |
Zhengxue Cheng et al., “Learned Lossless Image Compression with a Hyperprior and Discretized Gaussian Mixture Likelihoods”, Feb. 5, 2020, arXiv:2002.01657v1, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220292726 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63161216 | Mar 2021 | US |