Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to methods of performing surgical bone transplants. More particularly, the present invention relates to techniques by which donor allograft vertebral bones and intervertebral discs may be transplanted into a recipient patient to treat degenerative disc disease of the cervical, thoracic, and/or lumbar spine.
2. Background Discussion
Osteochondral allografts have a long history of clinical success in the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee, shoulder, hip, and ankle The principal advantage of the technique over all other techniques of cartilage restoration is the maintenance of an intact interface between the bone and cartilage of the graft and the preservation of the cartilage architecture; the allograft bone is placed in such a way that it heals to the bone of the recipient.
Spinal degenerative disc disease is the second most common cause of disability and a major cause of lost work days in the United States. (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2001; 50:94-97) The economic impact of this disease is staggering, accounting for an estimated 149 million days of lost work per year due to low back pain in the United States (H.R. Guo, et al., Am J Public Health, 1999; 89(7): 1029-1035). The estimated cost is between $100 billion and $200 billion per year, mainly due to decreased productivity.(Katz, JN. Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2006; 88 Suppl. 2:21-24). The strategies for the treatment of degenerative disc disease in most cases do not involve surgery. However, should such treatment fail, surgical treatment consisting of nerve decompression and discectomy may be indicated. In more severe cases of disc degeneration or in cases associated with deformity, spinal arthrodesis (fusion) or disc replacement has been advocated. The advantages of fusion are the high rate of clinical success in pain relief and in the correction of deformity. The disadvantage is in the risk of adjacent segment degeneration.
Disc replacement has been developed over the past 20 years and has recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. The long term results of this procedure are unknown. Furthermore, as the procedure is performed through the anterior approach, revision for failure is an exceedingly dangerous procedure. Additionally, the generation of particular wear debris adjacent to the great vessels may bring up some catastrophic complications.
Spinal discs are similar to articular cartilage in their composition from collagen, proteoglycans, and water. As such, disc allograft transplants have been performed with some early success in the cervical spine as published by Luk, K.D., et al (Spine, 2003; 28(9): 864-869). The present invention applies principles learned from fresh osteochondral allograft procedures to the treatment of spinal disc degenerative disease. The objective of the procedure is to maintain segmental motion with a fresh or frozen allograft bone-disc composite, taking advantage of the avascular properties of the disc and achieving rigid fixation to the host vertebral bodies on both sides of the allograft.
The present invention includes a method and apparatus for the preparation, transplantation, and fixation of fresh osteochondral allografts of the vertebral bones and the intervertebral discs for the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine of humans and other mammals. In its most general aspect, the inventive apparatus includes a first and second bone cutting assembly, the first bone cutting assembly employed to prepare a contoured cavity in a recipient spinal segment to receive a bone/disc allograft, the second cutting assembly to prepare the bone/disc combination allograft to tightly fit into the previously prepared contoured cavity. Using the inventive apparatus and methods, a precisely machined allograft hybrid comprising a superior vertebral body, an intervertebral disc, and an inferior vertebral body is prepared while maintaining the allograft disc in its pristine condition without any penetration of its annulus fibrosis.
Additionally, the invention includes a method for the preparation of the recipient diseased disc and adjacent vertebral bodies to receive the allograft hybrid tissue. This is facilitated by precisely shaping and sizing the bone segments of the donor and recipient to match so as to facilitate provide for a press fit fixation of the bone and to allow rapid healing between the donor and recipient bone. The intervertebral disc is in many ways an ideal tissue for transplantation due to its limited vascular supply. Furthermore since the transplant is denervated, the inventive method provides an excellent treatment for low back pain caused by degenerative disc disease and one that avoids the complications associated with intervertebral fusion and total disc transplantation.
The novel features characteristic of the invention, as to structure, composition, organization, and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages thereof will be better understood from the following description, considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. The various features of novelty that characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming part of this disclosure. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception, upon which this disclosure is based may readily be used as a basis for designing other structures, methods, and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. The claims should be understood to include such equivalent constructions as far as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The invention will be better understood and objects other than those set forth above will become apparent when consideration is given to the following detailed description thereof. Such description makes reference to the annexed drawings wherein:
Referring first to
Two screw holes 30 are disposed on the superior aspect of the top side of the jig for passing screws 32 to secure the jig to the vertebral body during the preparation process. In the central portion 34 of the jig, a cylindrical hole 36 is provided for insertion of an indexing element of a disc measurement stylus, such as a cylindrical indexing peg.
The disc measurement stylus 40 of the present invention. The stylus consists of two spaced apart and generally parallel horizontal blades 42 that slide into the annulus fibrosis of the diseased disc on the surface of the bone end plate and establish the depth of bone removal from the vertebral bodies such that the neural elements are protected posteriorly. The blades each include a leading edge 44, an outer spine 46, an inner edge 48, an upper surface 50, a lower surface 52, a heel portion 54, and a bolster 56. The bolsters are connected with upwardly angling elements 58 of equal length which converge at a vertex to form a central cylindrical peg 60, which fits within the cylindrical hole 36 of the cutting jig.
After passage of the cutting device using the cutting slots of the cutting jig, the screws are unscrewed and the jig is removed from the superior vertebral body. The cut portion of the superior end plate may be removed at this time. Preferably, however, this removal may be deferred until completion of the second cutting process of the inferior vertebral body. The residual screw holes SHr remain (see
At this point the inferior end plate may be removed, as may the superior end plate, if not already removed.
As will be appreciated, in both the first and second cutting assemblies, the jig is described as including a hole or receptacle for insertion of an indexing element. However, the transposition of these elements will produce the same indexing function so as to ensure accurate placement of the jig on the stylus or on the alignment guide. Accordingly, the disc measurement stylus of the first cutting assembly may include an indexing hole and the jig an indexing peg; likewise, the donor alignment guide may include an indexing hole corresponding to an indexing peg disposed on the second cutting assembly jig body.
While in general it is desirable that the slot patterns create both a contoured cavity and a matching allograft that are substantially bilaterally symmetrical along any medial line of symmetry (i.e., have reflection symmetry), other geometries, perhaps less than perfectly regular or symmetrical, are possible. Accordingly, the bilaterally symmetrical geometries described and shown herein shall not be considered as limiting.
The above disclosure is sufficient to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. The description also provides the best mode of practicing the invention presently contemplated by the inventor. However, while there is provided herein a full and complete disclosure of the preferred embodiments of this invention, the written description and the drawings do not limit the invention to the exact construction, dimensional relationships, and operation shown and described. Various modifications, alternative constructions, changes and equivalents will readily occur to those skilled in the art and may be employed, as suitable, without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Therefore, the above description and illustrations should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined instead by the appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/274,899, filed Aug. 24, 2009.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5258043 | Stone | Nov 1993 | A |
5417695 | Axelson, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
5423823 | Schmieding | Jun 1995 | A |
5514180 | Heggeness | May 1996 | A |
5545229 | Parsons | Aug 1996 | A |
5645597 | Krapiva | Jul 1997 | A |
5782835 | Hart | Jul 1998 | A |
5824078 | Nelson | Oct 1998 | A |
5919196 | Bobic et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928284 | Mehdizadeh | Jul 1999 | A |
6344058 | Ferree | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358253 | Torrie | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6488033 | Cerundolo | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6579321 | Gordon | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591581 | Schmieding | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6994727 | Khandkar | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997954 | Zubok | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018412 | Ferreira | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7169183 | Liu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7264634 | Schmieding | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7309358 | Berry | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7445635 | Fallin | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20050043800 | Paul | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050102029 | Blain | May 2005 | A1 |
20060276900 | Carpenter | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070135918 | Malinin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080161924 | Viker | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080255623 | Steiner | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO03066120 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO03079939 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO2007016247 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007142744 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008076181 | Jun 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ricci, J.A.; Stewart, W.F.; Chee, E.; Leotta, C.; Foley, K.; Hochberg, M.C. “Back pain exacerbations and lost productive time costs in United States workers.” Spine. 2006; 31(26): 3052-3060. |
Luk, K.D.; Ruan, D.K.; Lu, D.S.; Fei, Z.Q. “Fresh frozen intervertebral disc allografting in a bipedal animal model.” Spine. 2003; 28(9): 864-869; discussion 870. |
Luk, K.D.; Ruan, D.K.; Chow, D.H.; Leong, J.C. “Intervertebral disc autografting in a bipedal animal model.” Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 (337): 13-26. |
Luk, K.D.; Ruan, D.K. “Intervertebral disc transplantation: a biological approach to motion preservation.” Eur Spine J. 2008; 17 Suppl 4: 504-510. |
Ruan, D.; He, Q., Ding, Y.; Hou, L.; Li, J.; Luk, K.D. Intervertebral disc transplantation in the treatment of degenerative spine disease: a preliminary study. Lancet 2007; 369(9566): 993-999. |
Stewart, W.F.; Ricci, J.A.; Chee, E.; Morganstein, D.; Lipton, R. Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA. 2003; 290(18): 2443-2454. |
Guo, H.R.; Tanaka, S.; Halperin, W.E.; Cameron, L.L. Back pain prevalence in US industry and estimates of lost workdays. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(7): 1029-1035. |
Katz, J.N. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain; socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88 Suppl 2:21-24. |
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults—United States, 1999. JAMA 2001; 285(12): 1571-1572. |
Freburger, J.K.; Holmes, G.M.; Agans, R.P.; Jackman, A.M.; Darter, J.D.; Wallace, A.S.; Castel, L.D.; Kalsbeek, W.D., Casey, T.S. The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(3): 251-258. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110046628 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61274899 | Aug 2009 | US |