This invention relates generally to coal mining, and more particularly to the application of rock dust to a mine wall for the purpose of suppressing mine fires and preventing explosions.
In coal mining, it has been common practice to apply limestone in the form of a dust to the walls of a mine, thereby causing the limestone to adhere to the walls. The process, known as “rock dusting,” has two effects. First, because the limestone dust covers exposed surfaces of unmined coal, it prevents mine fires from being propagated along those exposed surfaces. Second, if methane, coal dust, or a mixture of methane and coal dust, ignite in a mine causing an explosion, the rock dust adhering to the mine wall will become airborne, and suppress the propagation of fire resulting from the explosion.
The United States Mine Safety and Health Administration has established standards for rock dusting, which include a requirement that all exposed surfaces of a mine be covered with rock dust at least 80%; of the content of which is non-combustible. Existing methods for applying rock dust include application of rock dust to a mine wall. Recently, mines have begun using chemical foam to achieve improved adhesion of the rock dust to mine surfaces. One method of using foam in rock dust application is to apply a dry mixture of rock dust and a foaming agent to a mine wall. Another method is to apply a mixture of foam and rock dust to a mine wall. In the last-mentioned method, the foam is formed, mixed with rock dust in a mixing vessel, and pumped through a conduit to the point of application. A system for utilizing foam to enhance the adhesion of rock dust to a mine wall is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,726,849, granted Apr. 27, 2004.
The invention is a method and apparatus, different from those previously used. One difference, which allows a number of advantages to be realized, is that in the method according to the invention, rock dust and foam are combined at the point of application to the mine wall.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, an apparatus for applying rock dust to a mine wall comprises first and second conduits. Means are provided for entraining rock dust in air in the first conduit, and means are provided for mixing a foamable liquid and air to produce a flowable foam, and for delivering the flowable foam through the second conduit. Means are also provided for combining rock dust and air taken from the first conduit with flowable foam taken from the second conduit. A nozzle connected to the combining means is provided for applying a mixture of air, rock dust and foam from the combining means to a mine wall.
In a preferred embodiment, the apparatus comprises the following interrelated elements. A vessel for temporarily containing rock dust is connected to receive rock dust from a supply thereof. A first source of compressed air is connected to the vessel, and a first conduit connected to the vessel is provided for carrying air, along with rock dust entrained therein, from the vessel. A first control means is provided for regulating the concentration of rock dust in the air carried by the first conduit. The apparatus also includes a mixing block for mixing a foamable liquid and air to produce a flowable foam. A pump, connected to a supply of foamable liquid and to the mixing block delivers the foamable liquid to the mixing block. A second source of compressed air is connected to the mixing block to supply air to the mixing block. A second control means is provided for independently controlling the rates at which foamable liquid and air are supplied to the mixing block. A second conduit is provided for carrying flowable foam from the mixing block to a Y-joint. The Y-joint has a first inlet connected to the first conduit for receiving rock dust and air, and a second inlet connected to the second conduit for receiving flowable foam. A mixture of air, rock dust and foam is delivered through an outlet of the Y-joint to a nozzle used to apply the mixture of air, rock dust and foam to a mine wall.
Various kinds of pumps can be used to deliver the foamable liquid to the mixing block. For example, the pump can be an air-driven pump connected to be driven by air from the second source of compressed air. In this case, the second control means preferably comprises a first adjustable valve for controlling the supply of air to the pump and a second adjustable valve for controlling the supply of air to the mixing block. Because the air-driven pump is operated by air from the same source that supplies air to the mixing block, the system compensates automatically for changes in the air pressure at the second source, reducing the flow of foamable liquid when the air flow rate decreases as a result of a drop in air pressure at the source, and increasing the flow of foamable liquid when the air flow rate increases as a result of an increase in air pressure at the source.
In another aspect, the invention is a method of applying rock dust to a mine wall. In accordance with the method rock dust is entrained in air in a first conduit. A foamable liquid and air are mixed to produce a flowable foam, which is delivered through a second conduit. The combination of rock dust and air from the first conduit and the flowable foam from said second conduit are combined in a Y-joint having an outlet. A mixture of rock dust, air and foam are thereby caused to flow through the outlet and applied through a nozzle to a mine wall.
The method and apparatus in accordance with the invention can utilize existing rock dust application equipment. The method and apparatus can also avoid the time-consuming and difficult process of mixing of foam and rock dust in a mixing vessel and delivery of the mixture over long distances from the mixing tank to a mine wall. The method and apparatus are also superior to alternatives in which a dry composition of rock dust and foaming agent are applied to a wet mine wall, and to alternatives in which foam and rock dust are applied to a mine wall in separate steps.
Further advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description when read in conjunction with the drawings.
In the apparatus shown in
The first source is connected to a rock dust system 14, which is a known apparatus designed to draw rock dust from a supply, entrain the rock dust in air, and deliver the air-entrained rock dust through a long, flexible, conduit to an applicant site within a mine, where the rock dust is sprayed onto a mine wall.
Details of the rock dust system 14 are shown in
The supply of rock dust 18 in tank 16 rests on a diffuser 20, typically a layer of cloth, below which an air chamber 22 is formed. The air chamber 22 receives air from air line 10. In an embodiment having two or more air chambers in side-by-side relationship, a diverting valve 24 can be used to divide the air flow so that each of the air chambers receives an adequate supply of air.
The air passes up through the diffuser (or through plural diffusers if more than one diffuser are provided), into the rock dust 18, causing the rock dust to take the form of a fluidized bed, from which rock dust can be drawn through a dip pipe 26, which extends into the fluidized bed to a location a short distance above the diffuser. The dip pipe leads to modulating valve 28 located outside the tank. Through a conduit 30, the modulating valve receives compressed air derived from the space 32 inside the tank above the fluidized bed. In the modulating valve 28, the rock dust flowing through the dip tube 26 is entrained in the air from conduit 30, and the mixture of air and rock dust is carried away from the modulating valve through a first conduit 32, also shown in
The modulating valve includes a flexible diaphragm 34, forming a part of the wall of a mixing chamber 36, through which air flows from conduit 30 past the outlet of dip pipe 26. A stem 38 that extends through and moves with diaphragm 34 has a poppet 40 at one end, arranged to regulate flow of air and rock dust from dip pipe 26 into the mixing chamber 36. The stem also extends through a wall 42 and is connected to an operating diaphragm 44 that separates the space between wall 42 and a cover 46 into two control chambers 48 and 50. A spring 52 urges the operating diaphragm in the direction to close the poppet 40.
A valve 54 in conduit 30 is controllable to restrict the flow of air through the conduit. On the upstream side of the valve 54, the conduit 30 is connected through a tube 56 to control chamber 50, and on the downstream side, the conduit is connected through a tube 58 to control chamber 48.
The restriction of air flow by valve 54 causes a pressure drop which in turn creates a pressure differential across the operating diaphragm 44 in the modulating valve, thereby allowing the amount of dust delivered through conduit 32 to be controlled. When the aperture of valve 54 is reduced, the pressure differential across the operating diaphragm 44 cause the poppet 40 to move in the opening direction, increasing the rate of flow of dust and air from dip tube 26 into the mixing chamber 36. At the same time, the reduction of the aperture of valve 54 reduces the flow of air into the mixing chamber through conduit 30. The result is that the rate of flow of rock dust exiting through conduit 32 increases while the air flows through conduit 32 at a relatively steady rate. Thus, the valve 54 can be used to control the concentration of rock dust delivered through conduit 32.
Referring again to
The other path into which air from line 12 is split comprises line 80, another ball valve 82, and a check valve 84, the outlet of which is connected to deliver air to the mixing block 74. Valve 82 can be adjusted to control the flow of air to the mixing block. A pressure gauge 86 is provided to monitor the air pressure in the air path leading to the mixing block.
As shown in
Referring again to
As shown in
All or parts of the rock dust conduit 32 and the foam conduit 104 can be flexible, allowing an operator to aim the nozzle for application of a foam and rock dust mixture to a mine surface.
The foamable liquid delivered to pump 68 through line 70 (
An example of a suitable foam concentrate described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,874,641 is one composed of 4% by weight sodium a-olefin sulfonate (100% active basis), 3.6% by weight stearic acid (100% active basis), 0.71% by weight potassium hydroxide, and 91.69% by weight, water. Any of the compositions described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,874,641, as well as many other known foaming compositions, can be used. The foam concentrate can be diluted with water to a ratio as high as approximately 10:1.
Another foam concentrate that can be used is one composed of 4% by weight sodium a-olefin sulfonate (100% active basis), 5% by weight stearic acid (100% active basis), 0.71% by weight potassium hydroxide, and 90.29% by weight, water. This concentrate can be utilized effectively at dilution ratios (water to concentrate) up to about 10:1. Significantly lower dilution ratios can be used, but reducing the dilution ratio below 7:1 has little if any beneficial effect, and can increase operating costs unnecessarily.
As mentioned above, the function of the mixing block is to maintain proper proportions of the diluted foam concentrate and compressed air. In the case of a diluted foam concentrate having the composition described above, a desirable proportion is from 2.75 to 3 cubic feet of compressed air (at approximately 100 psi) for each gallon of liquid. The apertures of the restrictions in the mixing block are chosen accordingly. The sizes of the apertures, of course, also affect the rate of foam delivery.
The ratio of air to liquid in the foam generated in the mixing block 74 can be adjusted by control valves 60 and 82 (
In the operation of the apparatus of
The concentration of rock dust in air in conduit 32 is controlled by valve 54 (
The proportion of foam to rock dust can vary considerably, and will depend to a large extent on the personal preference of the individual who carries the nozzle and applies the foam/rock dust mixture to a mine wall. In general, if the mixture contains too much rock dust, excessive amounts of fugitive rock dust can become airborne. On the other hand, if excessive amounts of foam are used, there is not only waste of foam producing chemical, but the amount of rock dust may be insufficient to achieve the desired fire-suppressing effect.
A number of foam/rock dust compositions were produced using a foam concentrate containing 5% stearic acid, diluted with 8 parts of water to 1 part concentrate. The wet weight of the foam/rock dust composition varied from 21.78 to 69.5 Lb/ft3. The water content (by weight) and the air content (by volume) of the several compositions are shown in the following table. The increasing weight of the samples corresponds to increased rock dust content, the rock dust by itself having a density of 90 Lb/ft3.
Samples 2-10 yielded satisfactory results, and sample 5, having a wet weight of 35.29 Lb/ft3 was considered to produce the best results. Sample 1 contained too much water and samples 11-13 had too high a rock dust to water ratio. It was observed that a higher air content produced a lighter, and more readily dispersed, mixture. For that reason, an air content of at least approximately 40% by volume is preferred.
The apparatus and method of the invention produce results in common with prior methods that utilize foams in combination with rock dust. For example, fugitive dust is significantly reduced, and the foamed rock dust encapsulates coal dust particles. The invention, however, has additional advantages. As mentioned above, conventional rock dust application equipment, e.g., the apparatus shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1954154 | Urquhart | Apr 1934 | A |
2146605 | Timpson | Feb 1939 | A |
2361980 | Tirrell | Nov 1944 | A |
4155508 | Fiorentini | May 1979 | A |
4394975 | Bare, Jr. | Jul 1983 | A |
4538941 | Thorne | Sep 1985 | A |
4805702 | White | Feb 1989 | A |
4874641 | Kittle | Oct 1989 | A |
5096616 | Kittle | Mar 1992 | A |
5143645 | Roe | Sep 1992 | A |
5167285 | Williams | Dec 1992 | A |
5215786 | Kittle | Jun 1993 | A |
5232279 | Boberg | Aug 1993 | A |
6135368 | Protan | Oct 2000 | A |
6431465 | Yie | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6726489 | Kappel | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726849 | Gay | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6929423 | Kittle | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6994491 | Kittle | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7530404 | Lenz, Jr. | May 2009 | B2 |
8003001 | Kaiser et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8584974 | Masloff | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8622144 | Davis et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8883868 | Masloff | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20030146410 | Gay | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20100186971 | Seyffert | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110203813 | Fenton | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120111583 | Brown | May 2012 | A1 |
20120205129 | Hussey | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140265523 | Wright | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150114671 | VanBuren | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150115690 | VanBuren | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130277072 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61585812 | Jan 2012 | US |