The present invention is related to patent applications “Universal Address Recognition for Text-Capable Communication Devices” application Ser. No. 11/371,029 and “Seamless Selection from at Least Two Destination Entities for Text Messaging”, application Ser. No. 09/695,234 both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates generally to electronic messaging. More specifically, the present invention relates to assigning a virtual address to and messaging to multiple text-capable destination entities.
Known systems have been disclosed that allow a subscriber to have a single personal telephone directory number. As a telephone call is sent to such a subscriber, the telephone call can be routed to the present or last known location of the subscriber. Such systems determine this present or last known location of the subscriber in various ways.
For example, some of these known systems determine a subscriber's location through the use of a radio transmitter physically carried on the subscriber's person. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,315,636 to Patel discloses a system where the subscriber physically carries a wireless personal communicator on their person. A number of radio base stations can determine the location of the subscriber through communications with the personal communicator. In another example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,125,176 to Foladare et al. discloses a system where the location of a subscriber is determined based on the status of general purpose electronic devices (e.g., television, oven and/or computer) within the subscribers home.
Other known systems are based on call forwarding techniques where a calling party dials one telephone number and the call can be then forwarded to another telephone number. U.S. Pat. No. 4,313,035 to Jordan et al., discloses a personal locator number uniquely assigned to a subscriber. The personal locator number is unique to the subscriber nationwide and is used in conjunction with a service code, e.g., “700”. The subscriber dials “0” followed by “700” and the personal locator number from any telephone. From this telephone, the subscriber can provide the number of that telephone so that subsequent telephone calls from a calling party can be forwarded to the subscriber at that telephone number.
These known systems, however, suffer several shortcomings. First, these known systems are limited to telephone calls having audio content, but do not consider other types of content. In addition to different types of content, these devices do not consider different types of devices and the different capabilities of those devices. In other words, all calls are treated identically regardless of the destination devices and their capabilities.
Second, these known systems are limited in how the communication devices of the subscriber can be configured with a common telephone number. On the one hand, some of these known systems allow incoming telephone calls to be routed among multiple communication devices of a subscriber based on devices that are physically located on the subscriber's premises or person. On the other hand, other known systems allow the telephone call to be received at a location remote from the subscriber's premises where the subscriber remotely dials in to set call-forwarding parameters. In sum, these known systems fail to associate a telephone number remote from the subscriber's premises that can still be associated with the communication devices of a subscriber.
A virtual address is configured. A destination address and a capability information associated with each destination entity of a set of destination entities associated with a destination party are configured. Each destination entity from the set of destination entities is a push-capable, text-message-capable entity. Each destination entity from the set of destination entities is associated with a virtual address. The virtual address defines a destination remote from the destination party and remote from premises associated with the destination party.
A virtual address is configured. A destination address and a capability information associated with each destination entity of a set of destination entities associated with a destination party are configured. Each destination entity from the set of destination entities is a push-capable, text-message-capable entity. Each destination entity from the set of destination entities is associated with a virtual address. The virtual address defines a destination remote from the destination party and remote from premises associated with the destination party.
The inventors have recognized that with the proliferation of different types of communication devices and their respective capabilities, it is increasingly difficult to communicate across these different devices, many different types of which can be owned by the same party. For example, one party with a wireless phone and computer can have difficulty communicating with another party that has a pager and a landline phone. Thus, the inventors have further recognized that one way to solve this problem is to develop a system that provides universality for text messages across all types of text-capable, push-capable communication entities.
Many advantages result from associating multiple destination entities with a virtual address of the destination party. Many different types of text-capable destination entities can be commonly addressed with the same virtual address, such as for example text-message-capable, push-capable pagers, wireless phones, handheld wireless devices and desktop computer applications (e.g., a text messaging applications or instant-messaging desktop applications). Consequently, different messages having different formats from different devices having varying communication protocols can be reduced to a common aspect of the text portion and then more easily reformatted to match the capabilities of the appropriate destination entity (e.g., language, character set, etc.).
Advantageously, a single service point is available because multiple destination entities are associated with the virtual address. Consequently, destination parties can add and/or drop destination entities without having to notify future source parties on the current status of the various destination entities. In addition, messaging can be processed conveniently at a single service point. For example, filtering certain sources for all destination entities or specifying rules for intelligent routing can be performed at a single service point.
Moreover, the services applied to and the routing of messages across the various destination entities can take into account the various characteristics of the destination entities. For example, the number of text messages routed to the same text-capable wireless phone can be limited (e.g., to five within an hour) while messages routed to the same desktop application (e.g., e-mail application) can be unlimited. Thus, the routing of messages can be tailored to the appropriateness for the given destination entity, messages to wireless phones can be limited to avoid annoyance and messages to a desktop application can be unlimited.
The destination entities are push-capable, text-message-capable entities in the sense that they can receive text messages. The term “text message” is used herein to mean an electronic message having a text-based portion where the information carried within the text-based portion is relatively short in length and is in a human-readable format. Such a text message can be, for example, an alphanumeric message up to 160 alphanumeric characters, commonly referred to as Short Message Service (SMS) messages in the context of messages from base stations to pagers, mobile phones and/or other handheld wireless devices. A text message can be used, for example, to carry short pieces of information such as abbreviated (or otherwise filtered) e-mails, stock quotes, updates on traffic conditions, or other relatively short alphanumeric messages. A text message can be, for example, an e-mail message having a text portion and a non-text portion, such as an attached file or a graphic component; the text portion of such a message is of particular interest while the other non-text portions can be, for example, removed through reformatting, as discussed below. A text-based portion of a text message is relatively short in the sense it can be practically read from the displays of most text-capable devices, including such devices having a limited user interface (e.g., a 120-character interface typical of wireless phones).
Service entities 110 and 120 can be any type of service provider or content provider that provides electronic content over communications network 100. For example, the service entity 110 can be a web-based service that provides push-based content, such as a newspaper, which provides a periodic and automatically-sent electronic text-based version of the newspaper from the service entity 110 to a previously designated destination party. In this example, the content from service entity 110 is pushed to the destination entity rather than being fetched (or pulled) from the service entity by the destination entity. Said another way, the content from service entity is “pushed” to the destination entity because the service entity provides specific content based on a previously general request.
Communication network 100 can be any type of appropriate network capable of transmitting voice and/or data. Communication network 100 can be, for example, any interconnecting network such as an intranet (e.g., a local or wide area network), or an extranet (e.g., the World Wide Web or the Internet). Communication network 100 can include various wireless connections as well.
Destination entities 150, 180 and 190 can be any appropriate type of communication device and/or computer-based application that is text-message-capable and push-capable. For example, destination entities 150, 180 and 190 can be text-message-capable, push-capable pagers, wireless phones, handheld wireless devices (e.g., a personal digital assistant (PDA) or handheld personal computer (HPC)) and/or desktop computer applications. The desktop computer applications can be, for example, a text messaging application, an instant-messaging desktop application or any other type of text-message-capable, push-capable application that is connected to a communication network, such as the Internet via a computer.
Destination entity manager 140 is a type of communication device that can manage other destination entities. For example, destination entity manager 140 can be an operating system of a personal computer that allows multiple computer software applications (e.g., desktop applications) to run on that personal computer. In such an example, destination entity manager 140 can be a computer operating system, such as Microsoft Windows, and destination entities 180 and 190 can be desktop applications, such as AOL Instant Messaging and Microsoft Outlook e-mail program.
Messaging service platform 160 is a computer hardware and/or software system capable of interacting with communication network 100 and capable of receiving text messages over communication network 100. Messaging service platform 160 has the appropriate hardware and/or software to route text messages according to embodiments of the present invention. For example, messaging service platform 160 can have hardware and/or software that performs the method described below in conjunction with
At step 200, a destination address and capability information for each destination entity associated with a destination party is received. At step 210, the destination address and capability information for each destination entity is associated with a virtual address. The virtual address can have any type of appropriate format that allows for message accessibility across different types of networks for different types of communication devices. For example, the virtual address can have an alphanumeric e-mail format so that text messages can be sent from e-mail address compatible entities such as desktop applications. Alternatively, the virtual address can have a numeric format so that text messages can be sent from phone number compatible entities such as text-capable wireless phones.
The destination address and capability information for each destination entity can be associated with a virtual address via a database. For example,
Returning to
At step 400, a text message having a destination address corresponding to the virtual address is received. At step 410, a destination party associated with the virtual address is determined. This can be performed, for example, by finding a match of the virtual address to the destination party virtual address 310 in the database record 300 shown in
At step 420, a destination entity associated with the destination party is selected. Using the example database record shown in
Alternatively, the selection process can be, for example, based on criteria specified by the destination party. For example, the destination party can specify a preference order independent of the availability of the destination entities.
For another example, the destination party can specify a preference order based on rules such as time of day rules. For yet other examples, the destination party can specify rules based on delivery costs (e.g., prefer relatively inexpensive e-mail delivery over more expensive wireless phone messaging), and/or rules based on the compatibility between the format of the received message and the user interfaces of the destination entities.
At step 430, the text message is reformatted based on the capability information associated with the selected destination entity. For example, if the received text message is intended for a wireless phone having a 120-character display but the message includes a short text portion and an attached multimedia file, such a text message can be reformatted by removing the multimedia file and including only the text portion. (In such a case, the reformatted message can be sent to the wireless phone and a copy of the original message with the multimedia file can also be sent to an e-mail application associated with a personal computer of the destination party.)
At step 440, the destination address of the text message is reassigned from the virtual address to the destination address of the selected destination entity. At step 450, the text message is sent to the selected destination entity.
Although the present invention has been discussed above in reference to examples of embodiments and processes, other embodiments and/or processes are possible. For example, although the
This non-provisional application is a continuation of and claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/695,235, filed Oct. 23, 2000, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4313035 | Jordan et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4745632 | Duffy | May 1988 | A |
5161184 | Smith et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5197092 | Bamburak | Mar 1993 | A |
5243645 | Bissell et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5315636 | Patel | May 1994 | A |
5347633 | Ashfield et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5414752 | Jonsson | May 1995 | A |
5493564 | Mullan | Feb 1996 | A |
5504804 | Widmark et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506894 | Billings et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5706339 | Eisdorfer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5742668 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742905 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754640 | Sosnowski | May 1998 | A |
5758286 | Leppanen | May 1998 | A |
5758293 | Frasier | May 1998 | A |
5781614 | Brunson | Jul 1998 | A |
5805804 | Laursen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5892822 | Gottlieb et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893099 | Schreiber et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903638 | Welter, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920815 | Akhavan | Jul 1999 | A |
5933483 | Pellegrino et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937053 | Lee et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946629 | Sawyer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5978672 | Hartmaier et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011843 | Hochman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018524 | Turner et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018737 | Shah et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028917 | Creamer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038644 | Irie et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052457 | Abdelaal et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069945 | Brown et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084969 | Wright et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092114 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104789 | Lund | Aug 2000 | A |
6108709 | Shinomura et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125176 | Foladare et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6157945 | Balma et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6307931 | Vaudreuil | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311057 | Barvesten | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6356935 | Gibbs | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381650 | Peacock | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389276 | Brilla et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6427164 | Reilly | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438583 | McDowell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6493558 | Bernhart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6546425 | Hanson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549937 | Auerbach et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584095 | Jacobi et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6615231 | Deen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628965 | LaRosa et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643685 | Millard | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6643686 | Hall | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654779 | Tsuei | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6690394 | Harui | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6731630 | Schuster et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754622 | Beser et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6792474 | Hopprich et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6832246 | Quine | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834324 | Wood | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6854007 | Hammond | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6901436 | Schneider | May 2005 | B1 |
7003555 | Jungck | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7373428 | Armstrong et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7403970 | Kamble et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
20030120811 | Hanson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040243719 | Roselinsky | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20080256201 | Flowers et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9726764 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9750230 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9800987 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9826621 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 0004679 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0004689 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0016571 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0022800 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0042809 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0072612 | Nov 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080273535 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09695235 | Oct 2000 | US |
Child | 12140205 | US |