The present application relates to the following commonly-owned pending patent applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/743,069, filed on Jan. 15, 2013, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/899,172, filed on May 21, 2013, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/901,283, filed on May 23, 2013, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/901,295, filed on May 23, 2013, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/717,147, filed on Dec. 17, 2012, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/900,191, filed on May 22, 2013, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/527,177, filed on Jun. 19, 2012.
1. Field of Invention
The present invention addresses launch, retrieval, and servicing of a hovering aircraft, especially in turbulent winds or onto an irregularly-moving platform, such as a ship in a rough sea. The invention is especially suited to unmanned aircraft of small size. It allows for a fully automated operations cycle, whereby the aircraft can be repeatedly launched, retrieved, serviced, and re-launched, without manual intervention at any point, and while requiring only modest accuracy in piloting.
2. Description of Prior Art
Hovering aircraft, be they helicopters, thrust-vectoring jets, “tail-sitters”, or other types, usually land by gently descending in free thrust-borne flight onto a landing surface, coming to rest on an undercarriage of wheels, skids, or legs. This elementary technique can be problematic in certain situations, as for example when targeting a small, windswept landing pad on a ship moving in a rough sea. The well-known Beartrap or RAST (Stewart & Baekken 1968) as well as the harpoon-and-grid system (Wolters & Reimering 1994) are used to permit retrieval with acceptable safety in such conditions. These systems require an expensive and substantial plant in the landing area, as well as manual operations coordinated between helicopter and shipboard crew. Furthermore the helicopter must carry a complete undercarriage in addition to the components necessary for capturing the retrieval apparatus.
Desirable improvements relative to such existing systems include (a) simplification of apparatus, and (b) automated rather than manual operation. Ideally automation would encompass not only retrieval but also subsequent refueling and launch. This would be particularly desirable for an unmanned aircraft, whose operations cycle could then be made fully autonomous. Some experimental work toward this objective has been done for a hovering aircraft by Mullens, et al. (2004), but with limited success even with light wind and a stationary base. The present invention by contrast provides for fully automated operation in calm or rough conditions, using apparatus which is simple, portable, and suitable for a small vessel or similarly confined base.
In one embodiment of the present invention, an aircraft would proceed automatically from free thrust-borne flight through retrieval, servicing, and subsequent launch through the following sequence of actions.
Since loads can be low during retrieval from hover, the apparatus can be light and portable. Furthermore, easy targeting makes the technique well-suited for both manual control and economical automation.
Additional features and advantages are described herein, and will be apparent from the following Detailed Description and the figures.
In preparation for retrieval, the aircraft uses an onboard winch to extend a tension element such as a lightweight tether 4 having an effector or end fitting 5, which in this embodiment takes the form of a hook as shown in
Note, however, that if the hook fails to capture the crossbar then the aircraft will continue unimpeded in thrust-borne free flight, and can return for another approach.
In most practical cases the tether will be attached to the aircraft below the aircraft mass centre. Hence, once attached to the horizontal guide, the aircraft can be maintained upright only by appropriate application of active control to counter inverted-pendulum instability. Control authority, however, may be insufficient to reject disturbances caused by wind gusts or base motion (as on a rocking ship). Sensitivity to such disturbances increases as tether length decreases. A tether attachment on the aircraft, as illustrated in
The next step is to translate along the guide toward a docking carriage 12. If the guide has sufficiently low sliding friction, or if the hook has rollers or effective rolling elements, as illustrated in
As the aircraft approaches the docking carriage, the aircraft can be guided into alignment by various constraining surfaces, including for example arms 11, longerons 13, and wing trailing-edge supports 14, as shown in
In the embodiment of
In preparation for launch of the aircraft, the docking carriage must be swung upright. In the embodiment of
When convenient, the aircraft powerplant could be started by an onboard motor, or by an external motor coupled to the engine by a suitable linkage. Pre-launch checks could then be executed automatically.
For launch, the hook 5 must be released from the guide 6. One method for hook release is shown in
The aircraft is then restrained only by gravity and the remaining carriage constraints. These could be configured to have some appropriate break-out force, so that the aircraft could exit into free flight only if it had some selected excess of thrust over weight. This would ensure that, upon pulling free of the docking carriage, the aircraft would accelerate briskly away from the base station and any nearby obstacles. The carriage 12 would then be swung to the inverted position in preparation for the next retrieval.
For automated operation, the aircraft and base station could each be equipped with satellite navigation or comparable equipment for measurement of relative position and velocity in three dimensions, using antennas on the aircraft 28 and on a reference point 29 near the docking carriage. Each could also have magnetic or inertial sensors for measurement of orientation, as well as appropriate mechanisms for computation, power supply, and communication.
Other illustrative embodiments are shown in
After inversion, the chain is retracted by a motor 10 into a stowage area 38 until the ball reaches the vicinity of the docking carriage 12. The aircraft can then park as described above. The carriage is then swung upright, which must be done in the direction that reverses the aircraft inversion (again this condition does not apply with the embodiments of
It should be understood that various changes and modifications to the presently preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present subject matter and without diminishing its intended advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims.
This patent application is a continuation of, and claims priority to and the benefit of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/037,436, filed on Mar. 1, 2011, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/317,803, filed on Mar. 26, 2010, now expired, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
968339 | Geraldson | Aug 1910 | A |
1144505 | Steffan | Jun 1915 | A |
1306860 | Smith | Jun 1919 | A |
1383595 | Black | Jul 1921 | A |
1499472 | Pratt | Jul 1924 | A |
1582188 | Mummert | Apr 1926 | A |
1625020 | Guillermo | Apr 1927 | A |
1686298 | Uhl | Oct 1928 | A |
1716670 | Sperry | Jun 1929 | A |
1731091 | Belleville | Oct 1929 | A |
1748663 | Tucker | Feb 1930 | A |
1836010 | Audrain | Dec 1931 | A |
1848828 | Griffin | Mar 1932 | A |
1912723 | Perkins | Jun 1933 | A |
2415071 | Brie | Feb 1947 | A |
2435197 | Brodie | Feb 1948 | A |
2448209 | Boyer et al. | Aug 1948 | A |
2488050 | Brodie | Nov 1949 | A |
2488051 | Brodie | Nov 1949 | A |
2552115 | Replogle | May 1951 | A |
2807429 | Hawkins, Jr. et al. | Sep 1957 | A |
3351325 | Cotton | Nov 1967 | A |
3785316 | Leming et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3980259 | Greenhalgh et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4079901 | Mayhew et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4116408 | Soloy | Sep 1978 | A |
4123020 | Korsak | Oct 1978 | A |
4147317 | Mayhew et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4311290 | Koper | Jan 1982 | A |
4575026 | Brittain et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4680962 | Durbin | Jul 1987 | A |
4753400 | Reuter et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4790497 | Yoffe | Dec 1988 | A |
4842222 | Baird | Jun 1989 | A |
5039034 | Burgess et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042750 | Winter | Aug 1991 | A |
5054717 | Taylor | Oct 1991 | A |
5092540 | Burgess et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5687930 | Wagner et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5799900 | McDonnell | Sep 1998 | A |
5806795 | Ortelli | Sep 1998 | A |
6264140 | McGeer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6824102 | Haggard | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6874729 | McDonnell | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6961018 | Heppe et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7066430 | Dennis et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7097137 | McDonnell | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104495 | McGeer | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121507 | Dennis et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140575 | McGeer et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143974 | Roeseler et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7143976 | Snediker et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152827 | McGeer | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165745 | McGeer et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175135 | Dennis et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7219856 | Watts et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7264204 | Portmann | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7344108 | Muylaert et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360741 | McGeer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7410125 | Steele | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7464650 | Steinkerchner et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7510145 | Snediker | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7562843 | Lipponen | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7712702 | McGeer et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7954758 | McGeer et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8245968 | McGeer et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8276844 | Kariv | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8348193 | McGeer et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8453966 | McGeer et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8464981 | Goldie et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020100838 | McGeer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030222173 | McGeer et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040256519 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050133665 | Dennis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151014 | McGeer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050178894 | McGeer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050178895 | McGeer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189450 | Roeseler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050230536 | Dennis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060065780 | Rednikov | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060102783 | Dennis et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060175463 | McGeer | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060175466 | Snediker et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249623 | Steele | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070051849 | Watts et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075185 | McGeer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070158498 | Snediker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070252034 | McGeer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080156932 | McGeer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080203220 | Hanzlick et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090224097 | Kariv | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110024559 | McGeer et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110133024 | McGeer et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110233329 | McGeer et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120187243 | Goldie et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120223182 | Gilchrist et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120273612 | McGeer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130161447 | McGeer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
781808 | Apr 1968 | CA |
839101 | Apr 1970 | CA |
472613 | Apr 1970 | EP |
2186728 | May 2010 | EP |
2 071 031 | Sep 1981 | GB |
WO 0107318 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2008015663 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2013171735 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mini-RPV Recovery System Conceptual Study, Prepared for Eustis Directorate U.S. Army Air Mobility Research and Development Laboratory, Aug. 1977 (322 pages). |
Skyhook (Harrier handling system); Harpoon Head Quarters; available at http://www.harpoondatabases.com/encyclopedia/Entry2979.aspx; printed Jun. 21, 2013 (3 pages). |
A miniature powerplant for very small, very long range autonomous aircraft, S.P. Hendrickson and T. McGeer, Final Report under U.S. DoE contract No. DE-FG03-96ER82187, Sep. 29, 1999 (25 pages). |
Aerosonde hazard estimation, T. McGeer, 1994 (7 pages). |
Aerosonde Pacific reconnaissance: ready when you are!, T. McGeer, Pacific Northwest Weather Workshop, Mar. 2005 (15 pages). |
An Airspeed Vector Sensor for V/STOL Aircraft, E. Durbin and T. McGeer, Journal of Aircraft, vol. 19, No. 6, Jun. 1982 (7 pages). |
Automated Launch, Recovery, and Refueling for Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, K. Mullens, et al., 2004 (11 pages). |
Autonomous Aerosondes for Economical Atmospheric Soundings Anywhere on the Globe, G.J. Holland, T. McGeer and H.H. Youngren, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 73, No. 12, Dec. 1992 (12 pages). |
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 10250229.1, dated Jan. 21, 2013 (5 pages). |
European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 11159710.0, dated Aug. 2, 2013 (7 pages). |
Examiner's First Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2007347147, dated Oct. 26, 2011 (2 pages). |
Flexrotor Long-Endurance VTOL Aircraft Transitions to Wing-Borne Flight, available at http://www.aerovelco.com/papers/FlexrotorTransitionsAnnouncement.pdf, dated Aug. 4, 2011 (2 pages). |
International Search Report (PCT/US2007/076276), dated Sep. 22, 2008 (7 pages). |
Laima: The First Atlantic Crossing by Unmanned Aircraft, T. McGeer, Feb. 25, 1999 (25 pages). |
Quantitative Risk Management as a Regulatory Approach to Civil UAVs, T. McGeer, L. Newcombe, and J. Vagners, International Workshop on UAV Certification, Jun. 4, 1999 (11 pages). |
Regulatory Issues Involving Long-Range Weather Observation by Aerosonde Autonomous Aircraft, T. McGeer, Oct. 9, 1998 (8 pages). |
Safety, Economy, Reliability and Regulatory Policy for Unmanned Aircraft, T. McGeer, Mar. 2007 (9 pages). |
The Beartrap—A Canadian Invention, Crowsnest Magazine, vol. 17, No. 3 and 4 [online], Mar.-Apr. 1965, [retrieved on Sep. 14, 2007]. Retrieved from the Internet at <URL: http://www.readyayeready.com/timeline/1960s/beartrap/index.htm> (4 pages). |
Wide-Scale Use of Long-Range Miniature Aerosondes Over the World's Oceans, T. McGeer and J. Vagners, 1999 (25 pages). |
Written Opinion (PCT/US2007/076276), dated Mar. 5, 2009 (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140054415 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61317803 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13037436 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 14034097 | US |