This application is a national stage application, filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371, of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2020/053307, filed on 2020 Feb. 10, which claims the benefit of German Patent Application No. 10 2019 103 926.6, filed 2019 Feb. 15.
The disclosure relates to a method and an apparatus for the axial shaping of a tube with the aid of a mandrel, which is guided in the tube, and an annular die, which is guided on the outside of the tube.
The axial shaping of tubes has been established in the metal industry for decades. Indents, flares and special contours, such as toothings, squares, etc., are among the standard applications. Axial shaping means resource efficiency, an uninterrupted fiber flow, strain hardening of the tube material and good surface quality of the shaped regions. The main field of application for the axial shaping of tubes is the production of components for the automotive industry and general mechanical engineering. Axial shaping can also be used to easily produce lightweight components in particular; this is why axial shaping is also coming into play in current topics such as electromobility and the reduction of CO2 emissions. Shaping is performed with the aid of a mandrel guided in the tube and an annular die guided on the outside of the tube, the inside diameter of which is, as a rule, smaller than the original outside diameter of the tube. The energy for the shaping work is provided by both hydraulic and electromechanical systems.
A sub-case of general tube shaping is the so-called “axial stretching” or “stretch forming,” as the case may be, of the tube; see for example the technical book entitled “Fertigungstechnik von Fritz Schulze, Springer Vieweg Verlag, 10th edition, page 445, Chapter 5.4.3. During axial stretching, the annular gap between the die and the mandrel is typically set to a distance that is smaller than the original wall thickness of the tube to be shaped. The tool pair of die and mandrel is then guided in the axial direction along the tube to be shaped, reducing the wall thickness of the tube accordingly.
Each of the printed publications DE 30 16 135 A1, DE 30 21 481 A1, DE 35 06 220 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,779,375 B1 disclose a method for the axial shaping of a tube.
An example of tube shaping can also be found disclosed, for example, in international patent application WO 2006/053590 A1. A method for producing hollow shafts with end portions of greater wall thickness, and with at least one intermediate portion of reduced wall thickness from a tube with originally constant wall thickness, is described therein. Production is carried out by initially inserting a mandrel with a diameter graduated along its length into the tube to be shaped and then moving a ring die from the side with the tapered diameter of the mandrel in the longitudinal direction over the tube with the internal mandrel. Thereby, the outer diameter of the original tube is initially reduced, and at the same time the displaced material of the tube is forced into the annular gap between the annular die and the stepped mandrel. Due to the gradation of the mandrel, this creates stepped undercuts inside the tube. The inner contour of the tube created in this manner corresponds in a complementary manner to the profile of the stepped mandrel. Over the graduated regions of the mandrel, this creates undercuts inside the tube, which typically have a greater wall thickness than the original tube. If the annular gap between the die and the portion of the mandrel with the largest outside diameter is smaller than the original wall thickness of the mandrel, the stretching of the tube occurs in this region, reducing the original wall thickness to a smaller wall thickness.
A disadvantage of the procedure known from WO 2006/053590 A1 is that the formation of undercuts inside the tube is only possible with individual discrete wall thicknesses, to the extent that this is specified by the gradations in the outer diameter of the mandrel. In addition, the formation of a plurality of undercuts on the outside in the longitudinal direction of the tube is not possible.
The invention is based on the object of further developing a known method and a known apparatus for shaping a tube in such a way that it is possible to form undercuts both on the inside and on the outside of the tube with a wall thickness that can be variably set within limits.
The object is achieved by the method as disclosed in this application. It is characterized in that, when an end position of the die is reached with the mandrel leading, the following steps are carried out: Reversing the direction of movement of the die and mandrel from the pushing direction to an opposite pulling direction; First setting step: Moving the die and mandrel in relation to one another to a first preset annular-gap setting; and first shaping step: Moving the die and mandrel in the pulling direction over a first partial portion of the free tube portion, while maintaining the first preset annular-gap setting, for shaping the tube.
The first setting step and any subsequent setting steps allow the die and the mandrel to be moved in relation to one another and thus the annular gap between the die and the mandrel to be variably set to any desired dimension—preferably limited to the original outside diameter as a maximum. Due to the presence of conical transition portions with both the annular die and the mandrel, undercuts are possible in the shaping region of the tube, particularly within the original tube wall thickness, because of the variable setting of the annular gap. Depending on whether the conical transition portions taper or flare towards the free end of the tube, the undercuts are possible on the inside and/or outside of the tube. The formation of undercuts on the inside of the tube and on the outside of the tube can be realized in one operation on one and the same tube on different longitudinal portions in each case. As a sub-case of this, a thick-thin tube with a constant inner bore can also be realized, with which only local undercuts are formed on the outside. Alternatively, thick-thin tubes can be formed with a constant outside diameter, but with undercuts inside the tube with different wall thicknesses on request.
The undercuts are formed by moving a tool pair of die and mandrel, preset with respect to the annular gap, over a partial portion of the free tube portion. The die and mandrel are moved in the pulling direction to form the undercuts, that is, when the tool pair is moved towards a shaping device, in which the die and mandrel are displaceably mounted and controlled. In particular, “pulling direction” also means a direction in which the tube to be shaped is subjected to tensile load. In contrast to moving the die and mandrel in a pushing direction, which is opposite to the pulling direction, there is no risk of the tube being deformed in an undesirable way, in particular compressed or bent, when the die pair is moved in the pulling direction.
Advantageously, the claimed method enables the creation of completely different geometries on the tubes with regard to diameter tolerances and work thicknesses by means of program-controlled shaping sequences, without the geometries of the tools, that is, the die and the mandrel, having to change during the shaping process. The method allows the use of simple (pre-) tubes, which did not already have to be pre-shaped in separate method steps, and thus better value-added potential in component production. The use of forward and backward movements of the die—mandrel tool pair for shaping the tube signifies resource efficiency. The method allows a targeted reduction of the wall thickness of the tubes in limited local tube portions according to a previously made design layout. The local reduction of the wall thickness of a tube may be desired, for example, to introduce a predetermined breaking point. Another advantage is the possibility of using inexpensive pre-tubes in accordance with the German Industry Standard DIN EN 10305-3 instead of the previously required tubes of a more expensive quality according to the standard DIN EN 10305-2.
The term “free tube portion” means: unclamped tube portion.
The terms “push” or “pushing direction” mean a direction away from a shaping device, from which the die and mandrel are moved, and towards a clamping device. In particular, the pushing direction means a direction in which the tube to be shaped is subjected to pressure.
The term “pulling direction” means a direction opposite to the pushing direction. With the pulling direction, the tube to be shaped is always subjected to tensile load. There is no risk of compressing or bending the tube. However, when shaping in the pulling direction, there is a risk of fracture or cracking of the tube to be shaped if the tensile load becomes too great.
The term “synchronous” in the present description means the movement of die and mandrel at the same speed in the same axial direction. Synchronous travel always takes place with a fixed annular gap. Changing the size of the annular gap always requires relative movement of the die and mandrel at different speeds, which precludes the synchronous movement of the die and mandrel.
The term “vertical” refers to the y-direction of the coordinate system, as shown in
The term “negative annular gap” means that annular gap that is spanned by the conical transition portions of the die and mandrel that taper towards the free end of the tube or towards the mandrel bar or towards the shaping device, as the case may be, in the figures. Independently of this, the conical transition flanks of the die and mandrel can be designed to converge, be parallel or diverge in relation to one another. Thereby, the conical transition portions can overlap or oppose each other, as the case may be, at least a short distance in the vertical direction. In the figures, the mandrel is then offset to the left with respect to the die. In other words, the negative annular gap—viewed in the pulling direction—is located on the rear side of the die. Machining the tube with a negative annular gap results in the formation of an undercut on the outside of the tube.
The term “minimum annular gap” means an annular gap with a minimum vertical distance between the die and the mandrel. It is formed in particular between the narrowest point of the annular die and an opposite, usually cylindrical (transition) portion of the mandrel. As a rule, the die—mandrel tool pair is selected prior to the beginning of tube shaping, such that the minimum annular gap dimension corresponds to a later desired minimum wall thickness of the tube to be shaped. The minimum wall thickness is usually selected to be less than or equal to the original wall thickness of the tube. It can be realized later by axial stretching of the tube.
The term “positive annular gap” means an annular gap that is expanded by the conical transition portions of the die and mandrel flaring in the figures towards the free end of the tube or towards the mandrel bar or towards the shaping device, as the case may be. Independently of this, the conical transition flanks of the die and mandrel can be designed to converge, be parallel or diverge in relation to one another. Thereby, the conical transition portions can face each other in the vertical direction, at least to some extent. In the figures, the mandrel is then offset to the right with respect to the center of the die. In other words, the positive annular gap—viewed in the pulling direction—is located on the front side of the die. Machining the tube with a positive annular gap results in the formation of an undercut on the inside of the tube.
In accordance with a first exemplary embodiment, after the first shaping step, the sequence of steps, setting step and subsequent shaping step, can be repeated as often as desired, in which case the annular gap can be re-set at each further setting step. Such repeatability of the steps allows multiple undercuts to be shaped on the inside and outside of the tube, distributed over the longitudinal direction of the free tube portion to be machined.
The provision of a cylindrical portion in the longitudinal direction of the mandrel makes it possible to set the minimum annular gap between the die and the mandrel, if the specified cylindrical portion with the maximum outer diameter of the mandrel faces the narrowest point of the annular die. If the die and the mandrel are moved in this relative position to each other in the longitudinal direction of the tube, the axial stretching of the tube takes place if the set minimum annular distance between the die and the mandrel is smaller than the upstream wall thickness of the tube in the pulling direction.
Alternatively, the annular gap between the mandrel and die can be set negatively or positively to form an undercut on the inside or outside of the tube.
Depending on the current situation and the previous shaping of the tube, the relative movement of the die and mandrel can take place in different ways within the framework of the setting steps. Specifically, with the first claimed setting step, with which the direction of movement of the die and mandrel is reversed, it is useful for the die to be stopped for a brief period of time and then for only the mandrel to be moved relative to the die, in order to set the desired annular gap. In other situations, it may be useful to continue moving the die continuously in the pulling direction and to change the setting of the annular gap by moving the mandrel relative to the moving die. In other situations, it may be useful to move the die temporarily a short distance in the opposite direction to the pulling direction, that is, in the pushing direction, while the mandrel remains stationary, in order to adjust the annular gap as desired.
Both for shaping the undercuts in the inner and outer regions of the tube and for carrying out the aforementioned axial stretching of the tube, the die and the mandrel typically move synchronously with each other while maintaining a previously undertaken setting of the annular gap. The die and mandrel are moved synchronously until a desired length portion of the tube to be shaped, in which the respective undercuts or stretchings are to be made, has been run.
It is particularly advantageous if the method is used to alternately carry out the formation of undercuts and the stretching of the tube in the longitudinal direction of the tube on the tube portion to be shaped.
The above-mentioned object of the invention is further achieved by an apparatus for carrying out the method. The advantages of this apparatus correspond to the advantages mentioned above with reference to the claimed method.
The control device required for carrying out the method for the individual control of the die and mandrel is designed as an electronic controller, in particular for the individual setting of the annular gap for realizing the undercuts and the stretching. However, for setting the minimum annular gap, as required in particular for the axial stretching of the tube, the control device can also be designed in the form of a mechanical forced coupling. Compared to an electronic control system, the formation of a mechanical forced coupling is particularly simple and robust. Finally, it is advantageous if the mandrel is designed to be profiled—in particular in the longitudinal direction. With the aid of a profiled formation of the mandrel, for example if the mandrel has a gearwheel-shaped cross-section, longitudinal grooves can be drawn in or formed, as the case may be, on the inside of the wall of the tube with such mandrel.
The description is accompanied by 18 figures.
The invention is described in detail below with reference to the above figures in the form of exemplary embodiments. In all figures, the same technical elements are designated with the same reference signs.
In order to carry out the method in accordance with the invention, it is not absolutely necessary that each of the die 120 and the mandrel 110 has two conical transition portions. To realize undercuts 220, 240 on the outside of the tube 200, only the conical transition portions on the die 120 and mandrel 110, which taper towards the free end of the tube 215, are required. To form undercuts 220, 240 only inside the tube 200, only the transition portions on the die 120 and mandrel 110, which flare towards the free end 215 of the tube and towards the shaping device 150, are required. If only a stretching of the tube 200 is desired, only the presence of the cylindrical portion 110-III at the mandrel 110 with a maximum outside diameter without conical transition portions is required. Depending on the desired shaping of the tube 200, the die 120 and the mandrel 110 must be selected in each case with the correspondingly necessary transition portions and minimum annular gap.
A control device 152 is allocated to the shaping device 150 for moving the die 120 and the mandrel 110 independently of each other along the free portion 210 of the tube 200 in a pushing direction S and a pulling direction Z. When the die 120 is moved in the pushing direction, the tube 200 is subjected to compression and there is a risk of bending and compression of the tube 200. When the die 120 and mandrel 110 are moved in the pulling direction, there is a risk of the tube 200 tearing, in particular if the annular gap is set too narrow.
In contrast to the subsequent shaping step, with which the die 120 and the mandrel 110 are moved in the pulling direction, the annular gap between the die 120 and the mandrel 110 is not important when the outer diameter is reduced by moving the die 120 in the pushing direction; its size is irrelevant; in particular, the mandrel 110 can advance so far in front of the die 120 that a conical transition portion of the mandrel 110 facing the die 120 has no influence on the wall of the tube 200 if the latter is reduced by the movement of the die 120.
In accordance with
In
In order to reverse this increase in wall thickness, at least in a first partial portion T1 of the free end of the tube 200, the die 120 and the mandrel 110 are moved to their minimum ring spacing dmin in a first setting step, resulting in an annular gap setting 130 as shown in
Such setting of the minimum annular gap by changing the position of the die 120 and the mandrel 110 in relation to one another can be made, on the one hand, electronically or, on the other hand, as shown in
In the case of forced coupling, the die 120 is mounted in or on, as the case may be, the traversing carriage 153 so as to be displaceable with an axial clearance x in the axial direction. Their movement is limited by two stops 150-I and 150-II in the axial direction. In the initial position shown in
When the stop position of the carriage 153 on the clamping device 140 shown in
The minimum ring spacing dmin can be less than or equal to the original wall thickness of the tube 200. In any case, in accordance with
At this point, in accordance with
The tool pair of die 120 and mandrel 110 is then moved further in the pulling direction Z with this new negative annular-gap setting, and an undercut 220 is formed in the second shaping portion T2 on the outside of the previously thickness-reduced tube.
At the end of the desired length T2, the die 120 and the mandrel 110 are again set to the minimum ring distance dmin, that is, moved in relation to one another. This is done via a further setting portion TE3; see
In accordance with
In accordance with
Moving the die 120 and mandrel 110 while maintaining the now set positive annular gap results in the formation of an undercut 240 on the inside of the tube 200, as shown in
It is important to mention that the sequence of steps explained here and the final result shown in
The wall thickness of the tube 200 in the region of an undercut 220, 240 depends on the actual set positive or negative annular distance, that is, the actual distance between the conical transition portions. Due to the electronic setting of the die 120 and the mandrel 110 in relation to one another, this distance and thus the wall thickness in the region of an undercut 220, 240 can be set highly precisely to any desired dimension.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2019 103 926.6 | Feb 2019 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/053307 | 2/10/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/165082 | 8/20/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2535339 | Woeller | Dec 1950 | A |
2998125 | Hahn et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
5119662 | Sunaga | Jun 1992 | A |
6779375 | Alexoff | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20080115553 | Brochheuser et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090158799 | Takeishi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100289318 | Le et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110260423 | Lepre | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20160146250 | Thumm et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20190076902 | Mizumura et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1905 | Jul 1905 | AD |
101121182 | Feb 2008 | CN |
102177036 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102357546 | Feb 2012 | CN |
104722701 | Jun 2015 | CN |
3016135 | Oct 1981 | DE |
3021481 | Dec 1981 | DE |
3506220 | Aug 1986 | DE |
102014017426 | May 2016 | DE |
3427852 | Jan 2019 | EP |
190515351 | Nov 1905 | GB |
2006053590 | May 2006 | WO |
2006088138 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2006088138 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2010117920 | Oct 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fertigungstechnik von Fritz Schulze, Springer Vieweg Verlag, p. 445. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220134401 A1 | May 2022 | US |