The administration of blood or blood components often plays a critical role in the emergency and/or long term treatment of patients. Blood or the individual components of blood (such as platelets, plasma, red blood cells, etc.) may be administered or transfused to patients to treat a variety of conditions. For example, blood may be administered to a patient to replace blood lost as a result of trauma, while individual blood components may be administered as part of a longer term treatment of patients suffering from cancer or certain blood related diseases. The blood or blood components administered to the patient come from blood previously collected from donors.
One of the most common blood collection techniques, and perhaps the most well-known, is the “manual” collection of whole blood from healthy donors. As commonly understood and as used herein, “manual” collection refers to a collection method where whole blood is allowed to drain from the donor and into a collection container without the use of external pumps or similar devices. This is in contrast to the so-called “automated” procedures where blood is withdrawn from a donor and further processed by an instrument that typically includes a processing or separation device and pumps for moving blood or blood components into and out of the device.
Regardless of whether the blood collection technique is manual or automated, withdrawing blood from the donor typically includes inserting a vein access device, such as a needle, into the donor's arm (and, more specifically, the donor's vein) and withdrawing blood from the donor through the needle. The “venipuncture” needle typically has attached to it, one end of a plastic tube that provides a flow path for the blood. The other end of the plastic tube terminates in one or more pre-attached plastic blood containers or bags for collecting the blood. The needle, tubing and containers make up a blood processing set which is pre-sterilized and disposed of after a single use.
In the manual technique, the collection container and plastic tubing may also include a volume of a liquid anticoagulant, while in the automated technique, a separate container of anticoagulant may be provided from which the anticoagulant is metered into the flow path and mixed with the incoming whole blood. In any event, anticoagulant is required because of the tendency of blood to clot and adhere to the walls of the plastic surfaces which it contacts.
An important consideration in any blood collection technique or system is ensuring that the system or set does not become contaminated by airborne bacteria or other foreign substances that may compromise the sterility of the system. Thus, the sterility of the above-described disposable blood processing set or system is maintained by minimizing exposure of the flow paths and interiors of the blood containers to the outside environment. Such systems are commonly referred to as “closed” systems.
After collection but prior to transfusion to a patient, the blood is typically tested for determining blood type and the presence of pathogens such as virus, bacteria and/or other foreign substances in the donor's blood. Typically, testing of the collected blood requires obtaining a sample of the blood from the blood donor at or near the time of collection.
One well-known technique of obtaining a blood sample is to simply withdraw or collect the blood remaining in the flow path of the disposable set after donation. This involves removing the needle from the donor, inserting the needle into a vacuum sealed sampling tube and allowing the blood from the flow path to drain into the tube. However, because there is a limited supply of blood remaining in the flow path, there may not be enough blood to provide enough of a sample to perform all of the required or desired testing. Accordingly, if a larger volume or numerous samples of blood are required, the technician obtaining the sample may continue draining the blood from the tubing, eventually withdrawing the collected anticoagulated blood from the collection container. Withdrawing blood from the collection container, however, may be less desirable in that it may expose the collected blood in the collection container to the outside environment. Withdrawing blood from the collection container for sampling also reduces the volume of available blood for later processing and transfusion.
An alternative to collecting anticoagulated blood from the collection container is to clamp off the flow path near the collection container and divert the blood being withdrawn from the donor to a collection (sampling) tube or tube of the type described above. This procedure typically employs a particular type of disposable tubing set having a pre-attached sampling site on the main flow path. Blood at or near the sampling site may be obtained by piercing the sampling site with a separately provided needle or other piercing device, and attaching a sampling tube thereto. To minimize the risk that the incoming blood (which is intended for later processing and transfusion) will be exposed to the outside environment, the sample is typically collected after completion of the blood donation.
Still another example of a blood sampling system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,656, which is assigned to the assignee of the present application. That patent describes a disposable tubing set wherein the flow path includes an enlarged sample collection portion. Blood for sampling is collected in the enlarged portion by clamping off the flow path near the collection container and allowing the enlarged tubing portion to fill with blood. Once the desired volume of blood for sampling is collected in the enlarged tubing portion, the needle is removed from the donor and the blood is transferred to a tube by piercing the cap of the tube with the needle and allowing the blood to drain into the sampling tube.
While these known techniques have generally worked satisfactorily, efforts continue to provide further improvements in the area of blood sampling. For example, as set forth above, the sample is typically obtained after the blood product (intended for further processing and transfusion) has been collected so as to preserve the sterility of the closed system. However, if the donation procedure must be terminated before completion, there may not be an opportunity to obtain a sample directly from the donor. Thus, it would be desirable to provide a sampling system in which blood samples can be obtained either before or after donation, but without the risk of compromising the sterility of the system and/or the collected blood product.
In addition, as discussed above, the use of vacuum-filled tubes or tubes is common in blood sampling processes. When such vacuum-filled tubes are used, there is the possibility that the suction may cause the tubing of the blood processing set to collapse and restrict blood flow. Of even greater concern, particularly in small-veined donors, is the possibility that the suction may cause the donor's vein to collapse. Thus, it would also be desirable to provide a sampling system where the risk of donor vein or tubing collapse is minimized.
It would also be desirable to provide a sampling system which is integrated with the blood collection set and requires few separate or external components.
Finally, where the sampling system includes a holder (with a piercing member) for receiving a sampling tube, it would also be desirable to provide a holder that is compact in size, easily sterilized and reduces the risk that the user will inadvertently come into contact with the sharpened tip of the piercing member within the holder.
In accordance with one aspect of the subject matter of the application, a biological fluid sampling system is disclosed. The system comprises a flexible plastic container comprised of two flat sheets melt sealed together substantially along their peripheries and defining an interior chamber. A sample access site is external to and spaced from the container. An internal flow path provides the only path for biological fluid flow into and from the interior chamber and communicates with the access site. The internal flow path extends substantially into and substantially across the entire distance of the interior chamber to allow for substantially complete drainage of the container.
Turning now to
The blood processing set 10 may include a single blood collection container 16 or, more preferably, as shown in
As set forth above, blood processing set 10 may include a primary container 16 and one or more integrally attached transfer containers 20 and 24. During use, primary container 16 (sometimes referred to as the donor bag) receives whole blood from the donor through integrally attached donor tubings 14 and 15 and venipuncture needle 12. Container 16 typically includes a suitable anticoagulant such as citrate phosphate dextrose (CPD), citrate phosphate dextrose adenine (CPDA) or acid citrate dextrose (ACD).
Containers 20 and 24 may be attached to primary container 16 by integrally attached transfer tubing 30 and 32. Containers 20 and 24 are provided to receive blood components such as, but not limited to, red blood cells and plasma that have been separated from whole blood. For example, collected whole blood in container 16 may be centrifuged to separate the blood into layers of such components. The heavier cellular components, such as red blood cells, settle to the bottom of the container 16 and the lighter, less dense components, such as plasma (with or without platelets), remain in the top layer. The components may then be separated by expressing the lighter components through transfer tubing 30 and into container 20. Likewise, the heavier components may be expressed through transfer tubing 32 to container 24. Such “top and bottom” separation techniques and disposable processing sets are well known and are available from Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Deerfield, Ill. under the name Optipac®.
Of course, it will be understood that the present invention is not limited to the processing sets shown in the figures and that processing sets having different container and tubing configurations are also within the scope of the present invention. For example, a multiple container system wherein tubing segments 30 and 32 are both attached to container 16 at or near the top of container 16 may also be used. Container 24 may include a volume of a preservative or storage solution which is introduced into container 16 and combined with separated red cells after plasma has been expressed to container 20. Such blood processing sets are also available from Baxter Healthcare Corporation.
Containers 16, 20 and 24 and associated tubing segments of processing set 10 are typically made from conventional and approved medical grade plastic materials. One such material may be polyvinyl chloride that includes a plasticizer such as, but not limited to, plasticizers selected from the family of citrate esters, which are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,167,657, 5,100,401 and 5,026,347, all of which are incorporated by reference herein. Containers made from polyvinyl chloride plasticized with citrate ester or other plasticizers are available from Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Deerfield, Ill. Alternatively, and depending in part on the blood components to be stored, containers may be made from other materials such as polyolefin materials with or without plasticizer.
Turning now to the sampling system, as shown in
Container 42 (or the walls 56 and 58) may typically be made of any conventional medical grade plastic material that is sterilizable by known sterilization techniques including autoclaving. One such preferred material is polyvinyl chloride with a plasticizer, such as a citrate ester (e.g. n-butyryltri-n-hexyl citrate), as substantially described above. Of course, other known plasticizers such as TEHTM and DEHP may also be used. In one example, the material used to make walls 56 and 58 may include approximately 70%, by weight, polyvinyl chloride and approximately 30%, by weight, plasticizer.
Container 42 may also include an internal flow path that extends substantially into the interior chamber 54 of container 42. In a preferred embodiment, the internal flow path may be defined by a plastic tube 43. As shown in
As further shown in
Sampling system 18 may further include a receptacle or holder 68 as shown in
In one embodiment (shown in
Holder 68 may include a piercing member 74 as generally shown in
During a collection procedure, a sampling tube 70, as shown in
The method of collecting a blood sample from a donor during a blood donation using the blood processing system generally described above will now be described. In one embodiment, at the outset of the donation procedure, disposable processing set 10 may be provided with clamps 65 and 66 in a closed position, as shown in
Once a sufficient volume of blood for sampling has been collected, sampling system 18 may be isolated from the remainder of the processing set 10 by heat sealing tubing segment 62 in ways that are known to those of skill in the art. One device that may be used for sealing is the tubing sealing device known as the Hematron®, sold by Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Alternatively, line 62 may be sealed by a metal retaining clip or other means known to those of skill in the art. After isolation by seal 67, clamp 65 is closed and the clamp 66 is opened to allow blood flow into container 16 as shown in
In any event, once sampling system 18 has been isolated from the remainder of the blood processing set 10, blood collected in sample container 42 may be transferred to a sampling tube 70 as shown in
Finally, turning briefly to FIGS. 1A and 2A-2D, the blood processing sets shown therein are variants of the processing set 10 of
In
In another embodiment, shown in
More specifically, sampling system 18, shown in
The sampling systems shown in
Another advantage of spacing access site 122 a sufficient distance from container 42 along the flow path between the two (i.e., by either intermediate tube 126 or an extended tube 43) is that it provides the user with the ability to stop the flow from chamber 54 to access site 122 during the sampling process. Stopping the flow to access site 122 may be desirable where, for example, holder 68 fails or is blocked, requiring attachment of a new holder 68 (access device). Thus, the distance between access site 122 and container 42 should be sufficient to accommodate a clamp (such as clamp 65 shown in phantom lines in
In contrast to the embodiments of
For example, with the clamp 66 (in
Allowing tube 43 to serve as both the flow path for blood entering the container and the flow path for blood exiting the container provides advantages in addition to the benefits provided by tube 43 previously discussed (i.e., providing substantially complete drainage and preventing wall collapse during sterilization). By providing tube 43 for both blood entry and blood withdrawal, the sampling systems shown in
In other sampling systems and sampling operations for collecting a plurality of sample tubes that utilize a sample pouch, and separate access ports for blood introduction and blood withdrawal from the sample pouch, it is common for the first of the plurality of sample tubes to be underfilled. This is because resident air in the head space of the sample pouch and/or associated tubing is suctioned into the sample tube ahead of the blood. Such underfilled tubes may not be useable for sampling. In addition, introducing air into the sample tube may lead to hemolysis in the blood sample. Users of these systems have tried to overcome this problem by inverting the sample pouch to avoid collecting air, or by accessing the sample pouch from below or from the side of the sample pouch. Having to turn or otherwise manipulate the sample pouch, or access it from a position other than the top of the pouch can be awkward, burdensome and, in the end, unsatisfactory from the standpoint of the user.
In accordance with the present invention, air in the head space of container 42 is bypassed by tube 43, which extends substantially into the interior chamber 54 and, therefore, into the reservoir of collected blood as seen, for example, in
As shown in
Container 42 may also include embossed, printed, or otherwise marked gradations along the side peripheral sealed edge of container 42. Embossed indicia may be provided at the time of sealing together container walls. The indicia or gradations 134 provide the user with a visual indication of the volume of blood for sampling. Indicia 134 for indicating the volume within the sample pouch are also shown in the container of
As shown in
Interior chamber 120 of pouch 142 shown in
Whether the sample container is provided with a tube (e.g., tube 43) or other flow path (e.g., internal flow path 143), because the entry and withdrawal flow paths are one in the same, elimination of excess air from the vacuum sample tube can be accomplished without inversion of the sample container 42 (or 142) and without having to access the sample container from a location other than the top of the container.
The disposable processing set and sampling system of the present invention provide many benefits. One benefit is that a blood sample may be obtained prior to the donation while still preserving the sterility of flow path between the donor and collection container. Specifically, as described above, a blood sample may be collected in container 42 (or 142), which container may then be isolated from the remainder of the system (by, for example, sealing or clipping). Once container 42 has been isolated, a sampling tube may be introduced into the holder of the sampling system without the risk that bacteria or other foreign substances on the tube will contaminate the rest of the blood processing set, including flow path 14.
Another advantage is that blood samples can be collected without the introduction of excess air into the vacuum sample tube, making each collected sample, including the initial sample, useable for sampling and less likely to result in hemolysis of the blood cells caused by air.
An advantage of pre-donation sampling is that bacteria or foreign substances that may be present on the donor's skin will not be transmitted to collection container 16, but will be diverted to sampling container 42.
Another advantage of pre-donation sampling is that it allows for collection of sample for testing, even if the donation is not completed.
Another advantage of pre-donation sampling is that it may provide a more accurate profile of the donor's blood, particularly regarding the hemoglobin level of the donor. For example, during donation, the loss of blood volume in the donor is compensated by plasma. This compensation by plasma typically lowers the hematocrit of the donor's blood. If the sample is taken after donation, the donor hematocrit may be lower (by possibly as much as 0.5 g/dL) than it otherwise would be if the sample is collected prior to donation.
The present invention provides additional advantages, whether used for pre-donation or post-donation sampling. One advantage is the reduced risk of tubing or donor vein collapse as described above. Container 42 acts as a buffer between the sampling tube and tube or vein. Thus, any suction forces generated by introduction of the vacuum sealed tube will be absorbed by the container 42 and not tube or donor vein.
Of course, there may be other advantages of the present system not discussed herein which will be apparent to those of skill in the art.
The present invention has been described in accordance with the preferred embodiments. However, it will be understood that minor variations to the embodiments shown herein may be made without departing from the present invention which is specifically set forth in the appended claims.
This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/304,299, filed Nov. 26, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,044,941 which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/492,060, filed Jan. 27, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,948, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/364,628 filed on Jul. 29, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,387,086, and which incorporates by reference each of the above-identified patents and/or applications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2469641 | Kleiner | Feb 1949 | A |
2950716 | Walter et al. | Aug 1960 | A |
2955595 | Semple | Oct 1960 | A |
3064647 | Earl | Nov 1962 | A |
3127892 | Bellamy, Jr. et al. | Apr 1964 | A |
3187750 | Tenczar | Jun 1965 | A |
3217710 | Beall et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3342179 | Ellmann | Sep 1967 | A |
3416528 | Kahn | Dec 1968 | A |
3467095 | Ross | Sep 1969 | A |
3469572 | Nehring | Sep 1969 | A |
3494352 | Russo et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3654924 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3817240 | Ayres | Jun 1974 | A |
3890203 | Mehl | Jun 1975 | A |
3931815 | Takatusuki | Jan 1976 | A |
3945380 | Dabney et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4007738 | Yoshino | Feb 1977 | A |
4056101 | Geissler et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4121585 | Becker, Jr. | Oct 1978 | A |
4140108 | Nugent | Feb 1979 | A |
4181140 | Bayham et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4195632 | Parker et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4197847 | Djerassi | Apr 1980 | A |
4212308 | Percarpio | Jul 1980 | A |
4253458 | Bacehowski et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4256120 | Finley | Mar 1981 | A |
4270534 | Adams | Jun 1981 | A |
4294247 | Carter et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4295477 | Christinger | Oct 1981 | A |
4296759 | Joslin et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4307731 | Kaufman | Dec 1981 | A |
4320769 | Eichhorn et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4325369 | Nilson | Apr 1982 | A |
4340049 | Munsch | Jul 1982 | A |
4386622 | Munsch | Jun 1983 | A |
4407660 | Nevens et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4441951 | Christinger | Apr 1984 | A |
4507123 | Yoshida | Mar 1985 | A |
4547186 | Bartlett | Oct 1985 | A |
4586928 | Barnes et al. | May 1986 | A |
4637934 | White | Jan 1987 | A |
4655764 | Sato | Apr 1987 | A |
4658655 | Kanno | Apr 1987 | A |
4670013 | Barnes et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4687474 | Takanashi | Aug 1987 | A |
4763648 | Wyatt | Aug 1988 | A |
4784650 | Coburn | Nov 1988 | A |
4786286 | Cerny et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4790815 | Balteau et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4804363 | Valeri | Feb 1989 | A |
4820297 | Kaufman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4846795 | Minagawa | Jul 1989 | A |
4865583 | Tu | Sep 1989 | A |
4892537 | Carmen et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4900321 | Kaufman et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4900322 | Adams | Feb 1990 | A |
4911696 | Miyasaka et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4938758 | Ali-Sioufi | Jul 1990 | A |
4943283 | Hogan | Jul 1990 | A |
4976708 | Oshiyama | Dec 1990 | A |
4991601 | Kasai et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994039 | Mattson | Feb 1991 | A |
5002066 | Simpson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5033476 | Kasai | Jul 1991 | A |
5045067 | Ohnaka et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5046509 | Kater | Sep 1991 | A |
5048537 | Messinger | Sep 1991 | A |
5061365 | Utterberg | Oct 1991 | A |
5061451 | Ganshirt et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5084034 | Zanotti | Jan 1992 | A |
5098371 | Juji et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100376 | Blake, III | Mar 1992 | A |
5102407 | Carmen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
RE33924 | Valeri | May 1992 | E |
5114400 | Lynn | May 1992 | A |
5122129 | Olson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123570 | Dubow et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5125920 | Ishida | Jun 1992 | A |
5141490 | Fujii et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5141645 | Shiraki et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5154716 | Bauman et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5167656 | Lynn | Dec 1992 | A |
5180504 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5188629 | Shimoda | Feb 1993 | A |
5259841 | Hohendorf et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269946 | Goldhaber et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5270003 | Bernes et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5300060 | Nelson | Apr 1994 | A |
5330462 | Nakamura | Jul 1994 | A |
5358482 | Panzani | Oct 1994 | A |
5360012 | Ebara et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372143 | Bernes et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5395347 | Blecher et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403304 | Ishida | Apr 1995 | A |
5417681 | Miyake et al. | May 1995 | A |
5431174 | Knute | Jul 1995 | A |
5454806 | Shinonome | Oct 1995 | A |
5464397 | Powers, Jr. | Nov 1995 | A |
5480378 | Weis-Fogh et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5484418 | Quiachon et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496281 | Krebs | Mar 1996 | A |
5496301 | Hlavinka et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505716 | Simmet | Apr 1996 | A |
5512187 | Buchholz et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523004 | Tanokura et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527472 | Bellotti et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545339 | Bormann et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5573526 | Hess | Nov 1996 | A |
5573527 | Macabasco et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5601730 | Page et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5620008 | Shinar et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5649907 | Mori et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5665074 | Kelly | Sep 1997 | A |
5685875 | Hlavinka et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702383 | Giesler et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5743872 | Kelly | Apr 1998 | A |
RE35804 | Stewart | May 1998 | E |
5769839 | Carmen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772608 | Dhas | Jun 1998 | A |
5772880 | Lynn et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
RE35841 | Frank et al. | Jul 1998 | E |
5776338 | Mari | Jul 1998 | A |
5836619 | Shemesh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858015 | Fini | Jan 1999 | A |
5879318 | Van Der Heiden et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885261 | Longo et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897526 | Vaillancourt | Apr 1999 | A |
5928214 | Rubinstein et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6027938 | Barnes et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6051136 | Mari | Apr 2000 | A |
6123859 | Lee et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126618 | Bischof | Oct 2000 | A |
6132413 | Mathias et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159192 | Fowles et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6221264 | Ishida et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234538 | Lauer | May 2001 | B1 |
6267564 | Rapheal | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267745 | Mathias et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287265 | Gleason | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6325775 | Thom et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328726 | Ishida et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344139 | Utterberg | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358420 | Blickhan et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6364847 | Shulze et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387069 | Utterberg | May 2002 | B1 |
6387086 | Mathias et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6488860 | Mari et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6491679 | Okamoto et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495039 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517508 | Utterberg et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520948 | Mathias et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6585875 | Ryabkov | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592613 | Ishida et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6626884 | Dillon et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632201 | Mathias et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6669905 | Mathias et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6692479 | Kraus et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6969419 | Macemon | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6997893 | Mathias et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7044941 | Mathias et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20010025167 | Kraus et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010037078 | Lynn et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052497 | Blickhan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020019621 | Mathias et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020151834 | Utterberg | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183679 | Deverre | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030144607 | Mathias et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030176813 | Mathias et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208151 | Kraus et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019344 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040082899 | Mathias et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106890 | Goudaliez et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040260265 | Goudaliez et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050143712 | Mathias et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060111658 | Mathias et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111687 | Mathias et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2301263 | Dec 1998 | CN |
20311868 | Dec 2003 | DE |
0 334 956 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0 356 002 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0 428 723 | May 1991 | EP |
0 455 215 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0 462 548 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0 357 863 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0 714 667 | Jun 1996 | EP |
1 064 959 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1498148 | Jan 2005 | EP |
03 71 6592 | Feb 2009 | EP |
1 586 087 | Feb 1970 | FR |
2 655 532 | Aug 1991 | FR |
1320869 | Feb 2009 | FR |
10 211274 | Aug 1998 | JP |
WO 8904141 | May 1989 | WO |
WO 9002515 | Mar 1990 | WO |
WO 9617514 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9637150 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 9741905 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9828057 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9936109 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9958094 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0006225 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0007642 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0024313 | May 2000 | WO |
PCTUS0019076 | Oct 2000 | WO |
PCTUS2005034504 | May 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050148993 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09492060 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 10304299 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10304299 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 10956296 | US | |
Parent | 09364628 | Jul 1999 | US |
Child | 09492060 | US |