The gathering of downhole information has been done by the oil well industry for many years. Modern petroleum drilling and production operations demand a great quantity of information relating to the parameters and conditions downhole. Such information typically includes the location and orientation of the wellbore and drilling assembly, earth formation properties, and drilling environment parameters downhole. The collection of information relating to formation properties and conditions downhole is commonly referred to as “logging”, and can be performed during the drilling process itself.
Various measurement tools exist for use in wireline logging and logging while drilling. One such tool is the resistivity tool, which includes one or more antennas for transmitting an electromagnetic signal into the formation and one or more antennas for receiving a formation response. When operated at low frequencies, the resistivity tool may be called an “induction” tool, and at high frequencies it may be called an electromagnetic wave propagation tool. Though the physical phenomena that dominate the measurement may vary with frequency, the operating principles for the tool are consistent. In some cases, the amplitude and/or the phase of the receive signals are compared to the amplitude and/or phase of the transmit signals to measure the formation resistivity. In other cases, the amplitude and/or phase of the receive signals are compared to each other to measure the formation resistivity.
In certain situations, such as when drilling through formations in which the formation boundaries extend vertically, or when drilling from an off-shore platform, it is desirable to drill wells at an angle with respect to bed boundaries in the strata. This is often termed “horizontal” drilling. When drilling horizontally, it is desirable to maintain the well bore in the pay zone (the formation which contains hydrocarbons) as much as possible so as to maximize the recovery. This can be difficult since formations may dip or divert. Thus, while attempting to drill and maintain the well bore within a particular formation, the drill bit may approach a bed boundary.
As the rotating bit approaches the bed boundary, the bed boundary will be on one side of the bit axis, i.e. in one azimuthal range with respect to the bit axis. Conventional resistivity tools are not azimuthally sensitive and hence they do not enable efficient detection and avoidance of approaching bed boundaries.
In the ensuing detailed description, reference will be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
While the disclosed inventions are susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof are shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description thereto are not intended to limit the inventions to the particular form disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Notation and Nomenclature
Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components and configurations. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, companies may refer to a component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . ”. Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or a direct electrical connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct electrical connection, or through an indirect electrical connection via other devices and connections. In addition, the term “attached” is intended to mean either an indirect or a direct physical connection. Thus, if a first device attaches to a second device, that connection may be through a direct physical connection, or through an indirect physical connection via other devices and connections.
The present application relates to a method and apparatus for building a logging while drilling (LWD) tool having one or more tilted antennas to enable azimuthally-sensitive resistivity measurements. Reference to U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,512, which is owned by Halliburton Company of Houston, Tex., may be helpful. This patent provides relevant discussion and drawings pertaining to the implementation of electromagnetic antennae in downhole tools. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,911,824 and 6,181,138, also owned by Halliburton Company of Houston, Tex., may also be helpful. These patents provide relevant discussion and drawings pertaining to the use of tilted antennae in downhole tools.
Turning now to the figures,
In wells employing mud pulse telemetry, downhole sensors 26 collect data regarding the formation properties and/or various drilling parameters. The downhole sensors 26 are coupled to a mud pulse telemetry transmitter 28 that transmits the data to the surface. Transmitter 28 modulates a resistance to drilling fluid flow to generate pressure pulses that propagate at the speed of sound to the surface. One or more pressure transducers 124, 126 convert the pressure signal into electrical signal(s) for a signal digitizer 128. To improve reception, a dampener or desurger 140 reduces noise from the mud recirculation equipment. Feed pipe 18 connects to a drilling fluid chamber 142 in desurger 140. A diaphragm or separation membrane 144 separates the drilling fluid chamber 142 from a gas chamber 146. The diaphragm 144 moves with variations in the drilling fluid pressure, enabling the gas chamber to expand and contract, thereby absorbing most of the pressure fluctuations.
The digitizer 128 supplies a digital form of the pressure signals to a computer 130 or some other form of a data processing device. Computer 130 operates in accordance with software (which may be stored on information storage media 132) and user input via an input device 134 to process and decode the received signals. The resulting telemetry data may be further analyzed and processed by computer 130 to generate a display of useful information on a computer monitor 136 or some other form of a display device. For example, a driller could employ this system to obtain and monitor BHA position and orientation information, drilling parameters, and formation properties.
Cylindrical body 205 may comprise, for example, a solid steel tube having portions of its interior and exterior removed in order to measure resistivity, anisotropy, and boundary direction as described more fully in the issued patents identified previously. Various known techniques may be used to remove portions of cylindrical body 205, e.g., etching, laser cutting. The shape, length, and diameter of cylindrical body 205 may vary with particular applications, e.g., cylindrical body 205 generally has an outside diameter ranging from 4.5 to 20 inches and lengths between 2 to 4 feet. Cylindrical body 205 may comprise threaded connections or other attachment mechanisms at either end for purposes of assembling the tool segments to form a tool and to incorporate the tool into a drill string.
In
As shown in
The angle of each recess of elliptical recesses 210 and each antenna of antennae 215 relative to the longitudinal axis of cylindrical body 205 may vary as desired. In some embodiments, the angle may be 45 degrees. In other embodiments, antennae 215 may be at a plurality of different angles. Antennae 215 may be adjacent other antennae on segment 200, perhaps at zero angle (i.e., co-axial with the tool). Although not shown in
As further shown in
Tubular body 305 may be formed of conductive or non-conductive material, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, tubular body 305 is formed of non-magnetic steel. Tubular body 305 may be hard faced with, for example, tungsten carbide. Tubular body 305 has open ends so that it can be slipped on and off cylindrical body 205 while allowing segment 200 to be attached to a drill string at either end. The shape, thickness, diameter, and length of tubular body 305 may vary from one application to the next. Tubular body 305 may be tapered, as may be cylindrical body 205. In some embodiments, the inner diameter of tubular body 305 is the same as the outer diameter of cylindrical body 205. Tubular body 305 is preferably long enough to protect all electronics components, including antennae 215.
One or more patterns of windows 310 are formed in cover 300. Each pattern of windows 310 is designed to be aligned with an antenna identified by antennae 215. Each window is arranged with its long edges as perpendicular to the plane of antenna 215 as the cover's surface will permit. The number of windows may vary from one application to the next. The dimensions, spacing, and other characteristics of each window or each set of windows may vary from one application to the next. Structural integrity may impact the dimensions, spacing, and other characteristics. In some embodiments, each window within the pattern of windows 310 has equivalent dimensions. In some embodiments, the windows in the pattern of windows 310 are equally spaced. The edges forming windows 310 may be beveled.
Mounting holes 315 may be used to affix cover 300 to segment 200. As such, matching holes may be formed in segment 200 (not shown). Screws or other known means (not shown) may be used to join cover 300 to segment 200. Such means may be in addition to a pressure fit, weld or other supplemental method of retaining cover 300 in place over segment 200.
In
The volume of recesses 210 and the windows 310 and other area may be filled and sealed to prevent penetration of drilling fluid and other material. Suitable methods may include those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,512. However, the sealant preferably does not substantially degrade the ability of windows 310 to pass radiated and reflected energy.
In an alternative embodiment, the shoulders 525 may support discrete metal bars 230 interspersed with insulating material in a configuration like that shown in
While not illustrated, windows may also be formed in or on a segment, i.e., in the walls of the segment body, passing partly or entirely through from the outer surface to the inner bore. Voids may be created between adjacent windows for passage of one or more antennae. Retainer-insulators could be fitted through voids to prevent contact with the segment, assuming it is conductive. A cover with windows may or may not be utilized with such an embodiment of the invention.
Forming an elliptical recess on the segment 605, comprises, in some embodiments, forming an elliptical channel in a segment. In other embodiments, it comprises forming an elliptical recess between raised bands on a segment. The angle of the elliptical recess relative to the axis of the segment may vary from one application to the next. As previously disclosed, the shape and dimensions of every elliptical recess may vary from one implementation to the next.
Placing a tilted antenna within the elliptical recess 610, comprises, in some embodiments, creating an elliptical antenna having multiple loops of wire contained in a planar coil housing, gently distorting the coil housing to pass the antenna over the segment body to the recess, reshaping and supporting the coil housing within the recess, coupling the antenna to the electronics, placing the electronics in a hermetically sealed cavity, and surrounding the antenna with filler material to support and protect the antenna.
Providing a protective cover for the tilted antenna 615 includes creating a cover having a window pattern that aligns with the elliptical recess and the tilted antenna, and fixing the cover in place over the elliptical recess. The cover should comprise a rigid, wear-resistant material such as steel. The pattern of windows is designed to permit the antenna to function with relatively little loss. The windows perform this operation by preventing current flow through the cover in the plane of the antenna, e.g., by providing window edges that run perpendicular to the plane of the antenna.
In other embodiments, block 615 may comprise forming windows in the segment and creating voids between windows. In embodiments where windows are formed within the segment as opposed to a cover, 615 may merge with 605. However, a cover having windows may still be utilized to absorb the majority of wear and tear.
It is noted that the sleeve 300 and individual antenna cover 550 embodiments enable the logging while drilling tool to have a spacing distance between two tilted antennas of less than the vertical dimension of the sleeve or cover.
While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present inventions.
This application claims priority to Provisional U.S. Patent Application 60/807,136, which was filed Jul. 12, 2006 by inventors Michael Bittar, Randy Beste, Vadim Minosyan, and Mark Sitka.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2007/015744 | 7/11/2007 | WO | 00 | 12/30/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/008346 | 1/17/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2901689 | Barrett | Aug 1959 | A |
3014177 | Hungerford et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
3187252 | Hungerford | Jun 1965 | A |
3510757 | Huston | May 1970 | A |
3539911 | Youmans et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3808520 | Runge | Apr 1974 | A |
3982176 | Meador | Sep 1976 | A |
4302722 | Gianzero | Nov 1981 | A |
4319191 | Meador et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4360777 | Segesman | Nov 1982 | A |
4536714 | Clark | Aug 1985 | A |
4553097 | Clark | Nov 1985 | A |
4611173 | Bravenec et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4636731 | Savage et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4651101 | Barber et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4697190 | Oswald | Sep 1987 | A |
4700142 | Kuckes | Oct 1987 | A |
4780857 | Lyle et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4785247 | Meador et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4791373 | Kuckes | Dec 1988 | A |
4808929 | Oldigs | Feb 1989 | A |
RE32913 | Clark | Apr 1989 | E |
4845433 | Kleinberg | Jul 1989 | A |
4873488 | Barber et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4899112 | Clark et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4933640 | Kuckes | Jun 1990 | A |
4940943 | Bartel et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945987 | Wittrisch | Aug 1990 | A |
4949045 | Clark et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962490 | Lyle et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4980643 | Gianzero et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5089779 | Rorden | Feb 1992 | A |
5115198 | Gianzero et al. | May 1992 | A |
5200705 | Clark et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210495 | Hapashy et al. | May 1993 | A |
5230386 | Wu et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239448 | Perkins et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241273 | Luling | Aug 1993 | A |
5243290 | Safinya | Sep 1993 | A |
5260662 | Rorden | Nov 1993 | A |
5278507 | Bartel et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5329448 | Rosthal | Jul 1994 | A |
5332048 | Underwood et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5389881 | Bittar et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5402068 | Meador et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5428293 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5442294 | Rorden | Aug 1995 | A |
5485089 | Kuckes | Jan 1996 | A |
5508616 | Sato et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5530358 | Wisler et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550473 | Klein | Aug 1996 | A |
5563512 | Mumby | Oct 1996 | A |
5589775 | Kuckes | Dec 1996 | A |
5594343 | Clark et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5656930 | Hagiwara | Aug 1997 | A |
5720355 | Lamine et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725059 | Kuckes et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5757191 | Gianzero | May 1998 | A |
5781436 | Forgang et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5854991 | Gupta et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5886526 | Wu | Mar 1999 | A |
5892460 | Jerabek et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923170 | Kuckes | Jul 1999 | A |
5999883 | Gupta et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6044325 | Chakravarthy et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6147496 | Strack et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6158532 | Logan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163155 | Bittar | Dec 2000 | A |
6181138 | Hagiwara et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191586 | Bittar | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6218841 | Wu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218842 | Bittar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6297639 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304086 | Minerbo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6351127 | Rosthal et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353321 | Bittar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359438 | Bittar | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373254 | Dion et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6466020 | Kuckes et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6476609 | Bittar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6538447 | Bittar | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6541979 | Omeragic | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6566881 | Omeragic et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573722 | Rosthal et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6614229 | Clark et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6710600 | Kopecki et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6736222 | Kuckes et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6777940 | Macune | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788065 | Homan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810331 | Bittar et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6863127 | Clark et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885943 | Bittar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6900640 | Fanini et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6911824 | Bittar | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6944546 | Xiao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958610 | Gianzero | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7019528 | Bittar | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7038455 | Beste et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046010 | Hu et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7138803 | Bittar | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7202670 | Omeragic et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227363 | Gianzero et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7265552 | Bittar | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7345487 | Bittar et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7394257 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7427863 | Bittar | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7557579 | Bittar | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7557580 | Bittar | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7657377 | Sinclair et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7659722 | Bittar | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7786733 | Seydoux et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7848887 | Yang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7948238 | Bittar | May 2011 | B2 |
20030051914 | Bittar | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055565 | Omeragic | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076107 | Fanini et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030229450 | Strickland | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040061622 | Clark | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040196047 | Fanini et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050006090 | Chemali et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024060 | Bittar | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050083063 | Omeragic et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050140373 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050218898 | Fredette et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060011385 | Seydoux et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015256 | Hassan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060125479 | Chemali et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060244455 | Bittar | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070278008 | Kuckes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080018895 | Opsal | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080136419 | Seydoux et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090015260 | Bittar | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007273026 | Apr 2010 | AU |
0527089 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0814349 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0840142 | May 1998 | EP |
0093519 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1315984 | Jan 2011 | EP |
115343 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2279697 | Oct 2003 | RU |
2305300 | Aug 2007 | RU |
WO9800733 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO0155748 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO03069120 | Aug 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090309798 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60807136 | Jul 2006 | US |