This invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for measuring the surface elevation profile of a newly formed surface. More specifically, it relates to a system utilizing a plurality of non-contact, sensors (such as ultrasonic or laser sensors) to measure the distance between the sensor and the concrete surface, then determining the average slope of the surface between pairs of sensors. From a known initial elevation profile (in the neighborhood of a starting position), the profile of the entire surface can be calculated and utilized by the finishing equipment to remedy faults before the road material has hardened. This invention could be applied to other surfaces measured for smoothness and is not just useful for road surfaces.
Present-day method of finishing concrete slabs such as are used for road surfaces, utilize a slip forming machine to form the edges, screed and trowel the surface, as well as inserting some of the structural steel. The road is finished, and the concrete permitted to cure before the final testing is done to determine if the surface meets smoothness requirements.
From an early date, wheeled vehicles, called profilographs, have been used to measure the smoothness of a cured road surface, hard enough to support the wheels of the profilograph. Some commonly used varieties of profilographs are the California Profilograph and the Rainhart Profilograph.
The need for a profiler using non-contact sensors was recognized some years ago. A paper entitled Development of a Non-contact Pavement Smoothness Monitor for Use During Construction was prepared for presentation at the 1984 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board by Jeffrey A. Bloom. Described in this paper is a system for determining an aspect of road smoothness using non-contact ultrasonic sensors at four locations arranged along the road surface (parallel to the direction traveled by motor vehicles). The data from the sensors are used to calculate a quantity called Asymmetric Chord Offset (ACO). Using any three sets of sensors, a chord line can be envisioned between the points at which the outer two sets of sensors reflect off the road surface. The set of sensors in between these outer sets of sensors measures a distance between the road surface and the sensor set. The distance between the point on the road surface where this middle signal reflects and the point on the chord line directly below these middle sensor sets is the ACO for those three sets of sensors. Data are taken every three inches (in a direction parallel to traffic). Multiple sets of these sensors are used to make simultaneous measurements at a plurality of locations across the road surface.
With this method, only relative measurements are taken. No absolute datum is compared to, and the locations of the individual sensors relative to the road surface vary as the device moves forward. The slope of the beam on which the sensors are mounted is not measured. Therefore, an elevation profile of the road surface is not possible. Only values of ACO are calculated.
The bank of sensors disclosed in the above mentioned paper are mounted on a four-wheeled vehicle (called a “bridge”), made to straddle the road (the wheels run outside the concrete and forms, if any). Therefore, the operation performed by the apparatus is strictly a measuring and recording operation. Modifications to the surface profile, based on the findings of this measurement, are performed by separate machinery after the measuring step. Adjustments to the road finishing machinery may not be possible in real time. Furthermore, the Jeffrey A. Bloom bridge is a rather large apparatus, making transport difficult.
For the reasons mentioned, there is a need for a method to measure the elevation profile of the surface of a road using non-contact sensors as a device independent of a paving machine. Further need is for a device that can be mounted on a slip form paving machine (or other type of road-surface finishing device), permitting immediate correction to unacceptable surface profiles, as well as adjustments to the finishing machine's operation in real time.
A purpose of this invention is to improve upon the prior art by providing a method for measurement of a road-surface elevation profile while the road material (such as concrete or asphalt) is still workable. Measures can then be taken to repair serious elevation faults.
For the following description, let the x axis be oriented in a direction parallel to motor vehicle travel on the road surface.
For the present invention, an elevation profile of the road surface is constructed using a method called the “Incremental Slope Method” (ISM). ISM constructs a road-surface elevation profile by measuring the slope between successive pairs of points (oriented such that a line drawn between these points and the x axis define a plane) on the road surface which are separated by a known distance. Using a known absolute elevation at one point, it is possible to calculate the absolute elevation of the other point as
y1=y0+mdx
where y0 and y1 are the elevations of the points at x0 and x1, respectively, m is the slope between points 0 and 1, and dx is the known horizontal distance between the two points.
By moving the two points in the x-direction a known distance less than dx, the process can be repeated and the road-surface elevation profile can be constructed in as fine an increment as is desired. This points out the need for the a priori knowledge (or estimate) of the profile of the road surface in the region, x0≦x≦x0+dx. Then, on x0+dx<x, absolute elevations can be calculated, and the road-surface profile constructed in as fine a detail as desired (within the accuracy of the sensors and other equipment).
The incremental slope method is used to construct a road-surface elevation profile by measuring the slope between successive pairs of points on the road surface which are separated by a calculable increment.
A typical set of elevation sensors (such as 110) comprises three sensors which combine their efforts to provide the necessary and accurate information to calculate the distance the road surface 150 lies from the sensor set at a point defined by the intersection of the surface 150 and a line drawn through the center of the sensor set 110 perpendicular to the beam 120.
Calculation of the road surface 150 elevation can be carried out regardless of the angle of the beam relative to the horizontal.
For the following analysis, the following definitions are used (see FIG. 2):
Road Elevation Profile
To determine the road surface elevation profile, we begin with a known or estimated road surface elevation profile throughout an initial increment, x0≦x<x0+d cos θ0 where x0 is an arbitrary starting coordinate, d is the beam length 160, and θ0 is the initial angle of the beam 120 measured from the horizontal as shown in FIG. 2. Initial angle θ0 is as measured by slope sensor 140.
The sensor assembly 100 is moved in the direction of travel (from left to right according to
The elevation of the road surface 150 as determined by the forward sensor set 115 is calculated using the known elevation at the point sensed by rear sensor set 110. The method is carried out by calculating the vertical distance from the road surface to the rear end of beam 120, then the vertical distance from the rear end of beam 120 to the forward end, then the vertical distance from the forward end of beam 120 to the road surface sensed by the forward sensor 115. The orientation of the sensing apparatus is shown in FIG. 2. In practice, the calculation is as follows:
y2=y1+(h1−h2)cos θ+d sin θ
where the subscript 1 is for the rear sensor, and the subscript 2 is for the forward sensor. The x (horizontal) coordinate for the forward sensor is also required for later reference. This is found by:
x2=x1+(h2−h1)sin θ+d cos θ
The coordinates (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) are depicted in FIG. 2. However, the instantaneous x coordinate of the rear sensor is not immediately known. This must be calculated as follows:
where the superscript n−1 refers to the previous location of beam 120, while superscript n is for the present location of beam 120.
The coordinates (x2,y2) are recorded, the beam 120 translated another increment, Δs 310, and the process repeated until the end of the surface of interest is reached. Interpolation, using well known formulas such as a polynomial spline fit of the data, can be performed to estimate the coordinates of the road surface 150 between measured points. From the recorded data, several established roughness indices can be calculated and outputted. The data can also be displayed as traces similar to those used in the industry, presently.
A result could be calculated, for instance, in a fashion analogous to the measurement made by a twenty five foot, eight wheeled profilograph. See
Using interpolation between discrete measurement points, a continuous profilograph output can be generated.
Translation
The translating of the sensor assembly 100 can be carried out in several ways, and the present invention is not to be limited to a particular mode of translation. Commonly, a plurality of sensor assemblies 100 will be mounted on the rear of a road paving machine, such as a slip form paver as depicted in FIG. 6. This permits the adjustment of the paving machine as faults in the smoothness are detected, as well as the repair of the road surface while the road surface material is still sufficiently plastic to permit working with it.
Another common mode of translation is shown in FIG. 7. Here a dedicated rig for the purpose of determining the elevation profile of the road surface is employed. Again, a plurality of sensor assemblies 100 are in use to provide a profile of all the important parts of the road surface. Important paths along the road surface would typically comprise the paths motor vehicle tires will follow when the road is open for general, public use.
Initial Elevation Profile
As stated, above, the elevation profile a portion of the surface must be known, estimated, or assumed on the interval x0≦x<x0+d cos θ0. This information can be obtained in a variety of ways.
One of the ways the surface can be obtained in this region is to assume the surface is flat—that is, a straight line between x=x0 and x=x0+d cos θ0. The difference between the actual elevation at each point and the assumed surface will reappear as errors in the elevation (y values) on each interval following the initial one. There are two options for improving the resulting surface estimate:
1. Remove the resulting errors with a low-pass filter. By passing the entire elevation profile through a low-pass filter algorithm with a cutoff wavelength longer than d, the error would be diminished.
2. Attempt to remove the error by determining a Taylor Series or Fourier Series most highly correlated to the y(x) values in every interval of the surface profile.
Another of the ways the initial surface can be obtained in this region is to calibrate the measurement by laying a known flat plate having a length greater than d so it lies under both sensor sets at the initial location. Deviations from this flat plate are measured.
Still another alternative for obtaining an initial surface elevation profile is depicted in FIG. 8. In this alternative, translation of the sensor assembly occurs over a distance at least d cos θ0 without movement of the vehicle on which the assembly is mounted. This way, the angle, θ, is unchanging throughout the process. An additional translation sensor (610
x1n32 x1n−1+Δsn cos θ
y1n32 y1n−1+Δsn sin θ+(h1n−h2n)cos θ
where Δs is measured by the additional translation sensor. The superscripts are defined as above. The coordinates for the front sensor are given as
x2n32 x1n+d cos θ
y2n32 y1n+(h1n31 h2n)cos θ+d sin θ
Finally, the beam 120 can be rotated parallel to a (roughly) vertical plane about its center (the actual point of rotation is arbitrary, but for the following analysis, the center is the assumed point of rotation). No translation is to take place during this process.
To determine the rear sensor set's final location, x11, relative to its initial position x10, we calculate the horizontal distance from the initial location to the beam's center, then back to the final location. Referring to
The corresponding y location y11, relative to the initial y location y10, is determined calculating the vertical distance from the initial location to the beam's center, then back to the final location, thus:
At the same time, the rear sensor 110 can be measuring the road surface as the beam is rotated. The coordinates when θ=θ0 are calculated thus:
x20=x10+(h20−h10)sin θ0+d cos θ0
y20=y10+(h10−h20)cos θ0+d sin θ0
Then, as the beam is rotated, the coordinates from both sensors are calculated as:
The present invention is not limited to use on concrete paved roads, or to the concrete forming process. The method and apparatus described here is useful for any road surface material, including concrete and asphalt. This invention could be applied to other surfaces measured for smoothness and is not just useful for road surfaces.
Obviously, many other modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4823590 | Kniest et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5101360 | Bennett | Mar 1992 | A |
5201604 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5258961 | Sehr et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5362177 | Bowhall et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5393167 | Fujita et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5549412 | Malone | Aug 1996 | A |
5568992 | Grembowicz et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5588776 | Swisher et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5774374 | Scott et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6035542 | Woznow et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6161429 | Marvel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161986 | Smith et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6520715 | Smith | Feb 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030175077 A1 | Sep 2003 | US |