Method and apparatus for checking a measuring situation in the case of a hearing apparatus

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20070175281
  • Publication Number
    20070175281
  • Date Filed
    January 10, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Published
    August 02, 2007
    17 years ago
Abstract
It should be possible to balance microphones and hearing apparatus more reliably. To this end, provision is made for a method for checking a measuring situation, wherein at least two measurement points of a frequency response of the hearing apparatus are recorded. A check then establishes whether the at least two measurement points lie in a predetermined tolerance range above a threshold. If this is the case, an OK signal is output. Otherwise, if at least one of the measurement points lies outside the tolerance range, the position of the measurement point outside the tolerance range is ascertained and a fault signal is output depending on the ascertained position. It is therefore possible to establish, for example, whether a measuring chamber lacks proofness, a microphone is blocked or the microphone is completely malfunctioning.
Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is described in greater detail below with reference to the appended drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a test apparatus according to the invention, and



FIG. 2 shows level measurements depending on the frequency.


Claims
  • 1-10. (canceled)
  • 11. A method for checking a measuring situation when testing a hearing apparatus in a measuring chamber, comprising: recording a plurality of measurement points at a plurality of measuring frequencies for a frequency response of the hearing apparatus;checking whether the measurement points lie in a predetermined tolerance range;outputting an OK signal if the measurement points are in the predetermined tolerance range; andoutputting a fault signal if at least one of the measurement points is outside the predetermined tolerance range.
  • 12. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein a position of the measurement point outside the predetermined tolerance range is ascertained and the fault signal is outputted based on the ascertained position.
  • 13. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the predetermined tolerance range is between a frequency response of a microphone of the hearing apparatus in an ideal situation and a predetermined threshold value of the microphone of the hearing apparatus.
  • 14. The method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the fault signal indicates a malfunction of the microphone of the hearing apparatus if the measurement points are below the predetermined threshold value.
  • 15. The method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the predetermined threshold value is a noise level.
  • 16. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the fault signal indicates a lack of proofness of the measuring chamber if a gradient of a straight line between two of the measurement points exceeds a predetermined first value.
  • 17. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the fault signal indicates a lack of proofness of the measuring chamber if one of the measurement points at the lowest measuring frequency is below the predetermined tolerance range and another one of the measurement points at the highest measuring frequency is within the predetermined tolerance range.
  • 18. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the fault signal indicates a dirt accumulation at a microphone of the hearing apparatus if a gradient of a straight line between two of the measurement points is less than a predetermined second value.
  • 19. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the fault signal indicates a dirt accumulation at a microphone of the hearing apparatus if one of the measurement points at the lowest measuring frequency is within the predetermined tolerance range and another one of the measurement points at the highest measuring frequency is below the predetermined tolerance range.
  • 20. The method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the method is used for checking the measuring situation when adjusting the hearing apparatus in the measuring chamber.
  • 21. An apparatus for checking a measuring situation when testing a hearing apparatus in a measuring chamber, comprising: a measuring unit that records a plurality of measurement points at a plurality of measuring frequencies for a frequency response of the hearing apparatus; andan analysis unit that checks whether the measurement points are in a predetermined tolerance range and outputs: an OK signal if the measurement points are in the predetermined tolerance range, anda fault signal if at least one of the measurement points is outside the predetermined tolerance range, wherein a position of the measurement point outside the predetermined tolerance range is ascertained and the fault signal is outputted based on the ascertained position.
  • 22. The apparatus as claimed in claim 21, further comprising an internal generator that generates an acoustic test signal.
  • 23. The apparatus as claimed in claim 21, wherein the measuring chamber is a sealable measuring chamber.
  • 24. The apparatus as claimed in claim 21, wherein the fault signal indicates a malfunction of a microphone of the hearing apparatus if the measurement points are below the predetermined tolerance range.
  • 25. The apparatus as claimed in claim 21, wherein the fault signal indicates a lack of proofness of the measuring chamber if a gradient of a straight line between two of the measurement points exceeds a predetermined first value.
  • 26. The apparatus as claimed in claim 21, wherein the fault signal indicates a lack of proofness of the measuring chamber if one of the measurement points at the lowest measuring frequency is below the predetermined tolerance range and another one of the measurement points at the highest measuring frequency is within the predetermined tolerance range.
  • 27. The apparatus as claimed in claim 21, wherein the fault signal indicates a dirt accumulation at a microphone of the hearing apparatus if a gradient of a straight line between two of the measurement points is less than a predetermined second value.
  • 28. The apparatus as claimed in claim 21, wherein the fault signal indicates a dirt accumulation at a microphone of the hearing apparatus if one of the measurement points at the lowest measuring frequency is within the predetermined tolerance range and another one of the measurement points at the highest measuring frequency is below the predetermined tolerance range.
  • 29. The apparatus as claimed in claim 21, wherein the predetermined tolerance range is a tolerance distance between a frequency response of a microphone of the hearing apparatus in an ideal situation and a predetermined threshold value of the microphone of the hearing apparatus.
  • 30. The apparatus as claimed in claim 21, wherein the apparatus is used for checking the measuring situation when adjusting the hearing apparatus in the measuring chamber.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2006 001 845.1 Jan 2006 DE national