This invention relates to the treatment of intervertebral disc herniation and degenerative disc disease in general and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for closing fissures in the annulus fibrosus.
The human intervertebral disc is an oval to kidney bean-shaped structure of variable size depending on its location in the spine. The outer portion of the disc is known as the annulus fibrosus (or anulus fibrosus, annulus fibrosis, anulus fibrosis, or simply “the annulus”). The inner portion of the disc is known as the nucleus pulposis, or simply “the nucleus”.
The annulus is made up of ten to twenty collagen fiber lamellae. The collagen fibers within a given lamella are parallel to one another. Successive lamellae are oriented in alternating directions. About 48 percent of the lamellae are incomplete, but this value varies with location and it increases with age. On average, the lamellae lie at an angle of about sixty degrees to the vertebral axis line, but this too varies with location. The orientations of the lamellae serve to control vertebral motion (i.e., one half of the bands tighten to check motion when the vertebra above or below the disc are turned in either direction).
The annulus contains the nucleus, which has a consistency generally similar to that of crabmeat. The nucleus serves to transmit and dampen axial loads. A high water content (approximately 70-80 percent) assists the nucleus in this function. The water content has a diurnal variation. The nucleus imbibes water while a person lies recumbent. Nuclear material removed from the body and placed into water will imbibe water, swelling to several times its normal size. Activity generates increased axial loads which squeeze fluid from the disc. The nucleus comprises roughly 50 percent of the entire disc. The nucleus contains cells (chondrocytes and fibrocytes) and proteoglycans (chondroitin sulfate and keratin sulfate). The cell density in the nucleus is on the order of 4,000 cells per microliter.
The intervertebral disc changes, or “degenerates”, with age. As a person ages, the water content of the disc falls from approximately 85 percent at birth to approximately 70 percent in the elderly. The ratio of chondroitin sulfate to keratin sulfate decreases with age, while the ratio of chondroitin 6 sulfate to chondroitin 4 sulfate increases with age. The distinction between the annulus and the nucleus decreases with age. Generally, disc degeneration is painless.
Premature or accelerated disc degeneration is known as degenerative disc disease. A large portion of patients suffering from chronic lower back pain are thought to have this condition. As the disc degenerates, the nucleus and annulus functions are compromised. The nucleus becomes thinner and less able to handle compressive loads. The annulus fibers become redundant as the nucleus shrinks. The redundant annular fibers are less effective in controlling vertebral motion. This disc pathology can result in: (1) bulging of the annulus into the spinal cord or nerves; (2) narrowing of the space between the vertebrae where the nerves exit; (3) tears of the annulus (both “full-thickness” and “partial-thickness” tears) as abnormal loads are transmitted to the annulus and the annulus is subjected to excessive motion between vertebrae; and (4) disc herniation or extrusion of the nucleus through complete (i.e., full-thickness) annular tears. Degenerative disc disease is frequently the cause of substantial pain for a patient.
Current surgical treatments for disc degeneration are generally “destructive”, in the sense that they involve the removal or destruction of disc tissue. One group of procedures, which includes lumbar discectomy, removes the nucleus or a portion of the nucleus. A second group of procedures destroys nuclear material. This group includes Chymopapin (an enzyme) injection, laser discectomy, and thermal therapy (i.e., heat treatment to denature proteins in the nucleus). The first two groups of procedures compromise the nucleus of the treated disc. A third group of procedures, which includes spinal fusion procedures, either removes the disc or eliminates the disc's function by connecting together two or more vertebrae, e.g., by “fusing” the vertebrae together with bone. However, such spinal fusion procedures transmit additional stress to the adjacent discs, which typically results in premature degeneration of the adjacent discs. In general, the “destructive” nature of current surgical treatments for disc degeneration can provide substantial pain relief for the patient, but it can also lead to the acceleration of adjacent disc degeneration, which can result in new pain for the patient.
Prosthetic disc replacement offers many advantages. The prosthetic disc attempts to eliminate a patient's pain while preserving the disc's function. Current prosthetic disc implants either replace the nucleus or replace both the nucleus and the annulus. Both types of implants require the removal of the degenerated disc component to allow room for the replacement prosthetic component. Although the use of resilient materials has been proposed, the need remains for further improvements in the way in which prosthetic components are incorporated into the disc space to ensure strength and longevity. Such improvements are necessary, since the prosthesis may be subjected to 100,000,000 compression cycles over the life of the implant.
Current nucleus replacements may cause lower back pain if too much pressure is applied to the annulus. As discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,878,167 and 7,201,774, the content of each being expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, the posterior portion of the annulus has abundant pain fibers.
Herniated nucleus pulposus occurs from tears (or “fissures”) in the annulus. The herniated nucleus material often applies pressure to the nerves or spinal cord. Compressed nerves can cause back and leg or arm pain. Although a patient's symptoms result primarily from the pressure caused by the herniated nucleus, the primary pathology lies in the torn annulus.
Surgery for the herniated nucleus, which is sometimes referred to as a microlumbar discectomy, only addresses the herniated nucleus. With such surgery, the surgeon removes the herniated nucleus material which is pressing on the nerves or spinal cord. In addition, in order to reduce the risk of extruding additional pieces of nucleus through the defect in the annulus, the surgeon also generally remove generous amounts of the nucleus still within the annulus. However, this generally requires that the tear or fissure in the annulus be enlarged so as to allow the surgeon access to the nucleus material still within the annulus, and this enlargement of the tear or fissure further weakens the annulus. As a result, while a microlumbar discectomy frequently decreases or eliminates a patient's back and leg or arm pain, the procedure typically further damages the already-weakened discs, which may lead to the creation of future pain for the patient.
Thus there is a need for a new and improved method and apparatus for closing fissures in the annulus.
The present invention provides a new and improved method and apparatus for closing fissures in the annulus.
More particularly, the present invention facilitates the reconstruction of the annulus and, in some cases, the nucleus as well. Such reconstruction prevents recurrent herniation following a microlumbar discectomy. The invention may also be used in the treatment of herniated discs, annular tears of the disc, or disc degeneration, while enabling surgeons to preserve the contained nucleus. The method and apparatus of the present invention may be used to treat discs throughout the spine, including the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spines of humans and animals.
The present invention also enables surgeons to reconstruct the annulus and, if desired, to replace or augment the nucleus. Novel nucleus replacements may be added to the interior of the disc. Annulus reconstruction prevents extrusion of the nucleus replacements through fissures in the annulus. The annulus reconstruction prevents disc herniation that may cause back and leg or arm pain. The nucleus replacements may be made of natural or synthetic materials. Synthetic nucleus replacements may be made of, but are not limited to, polymers including polyurethane, silicon, hydrogel, etc., and/or other materials which may include elastomers.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention include one or more flexible longitudinal fixation components (e.g., filaments) extending across a soft tissue defect, such as a fissure in the annulus. One, two, three, four or more transverse anchor components (e.g., bar anchors), connected to the one or more flexible longitudinal fixation components, are preferably placed behind an inner layer of the annulus on opposite sides of the fissure, so as to anchor the one or more flexible longitudinal fixation components to the annulus, with the one or more flexible longitudinal fixation components extending axially through the annulus and laterally across the fissure so as to hold the fissure closed, whereby to prevent nucleus material from passing out the fissure and pressing on the adjacent nerves, including the spinal cord.
Significantly, it has been discovered that applying significant tension (e.g., about 15 N to 25 N) to the flexible longitudinal fixation components first in an axial direction substantially perpendicular to the adjacent surface of the annulus, and then in a lateral direction substantially parallel to the adjacent surface of the annulus, provides a significantly improved closure of the fissure in the annulus. More particularly, it has been discovered that applying significant tension (e.g., about 15 N to 25 N) to the flexible longitudinal fixation components first in an axial direction substantially perpendicular to the adjacent surface of the annulus pulls the transverse anchor components securely against an inner surface of the annulus, in a sort of “pre-tension” action. Thereafter, applying significant tension (e.g., about 15 N to 25 N) in a lateral direction substantially parallel to the adjacent surface of the annulus draws the fissure closed in a sort of “closing tension” action. Significantly, this serial application of a significant axial pre-tension, followed by a significant lateral closing tension, ensures a tight closure of the fissure and hence raises the pressure required to extrude nucleus material through the fissure. Prior to this discovery, flexible longitudinal fixation components were secured at a maximum of about 6 N tension, and even then in only a lateral direction substantially adjacent to the posterior surface of the annulus, which resulted in a relatively loose closure of the fissure which enabled nucleus material to extrude through the fissure. Significantly, it has now been discovered that, by increasing the tensile force applied to the flexible longitudinal fixation components to about 15 N to 25 N, and by sequentially applying the tensile force first in an axial direction substantially perpendicular to the adjacent surface of the annulus (i.e., in a pre-tension action) and thereafter in a lateral direction substantially adjacent to the posterior surface of the annulus (i.e., in a closing tension action), the efficacy of the closure is significantly increased, and the force required to extrude nucleus material through the closed fissure is significantly increased. By way of example but not limitation, it has been found that sequentially applying about 15 N to 25 N of tensile force to the flexible longitudinal fixation components, first in an axial direction substantially perpendicular to the adjacent surface of the annulus and then in a lateral direction substantially parallel to the adjacent surface of the annulus, increases by 64% the force required to extrude nucleus material through the fissure, as compared to conventional closures effected with flexible longitudinal fixation components using about 6 N of tension applied in the single, “parallel-to-the-annulus” direction of the prior art.
In one preferred form of the present invention, the flexible longitudinal fixation components (e.g., the filaments) are welded together so as to hold the fissure closed. This approach eliminates the need for knots, which inevitably slip and thereby reduce the tension across a fissure, and hence can allow nucleus material to migrate into and through the fissure. Welded flexible longitudinal fixation components are not subject to such creep or slippage and therefore maintain the desired tension across the fissure, which prevents the migration of even small amounts of nucleus material into or across the fissure.
The present invention may also be used to close other soft tissue defects in the bodies of humans or animals.
And the flexible longitudinal fixation components (e.g., the filaments) may be anchored to one of the upper and lower vertebral bodies.
In one preferred form of the present invention, there is provided a method for closing a fissure in a region of tissue having an inner surface and an outer surface, the method comprising:
providing at least a pair of transverse anchor components, each transverse anchor component being coupled to at least one flexible longitudinal fixation component having a longitudinal axis;
placing the transverse anchor components relative to the inner surface of the tissue on both sides of the fissure such that an exposed end of a flexible longitudinal fixation component extends through the tissue and past the outer surface of the tissue on both sides of the fissure;
applying axial tension to the exposed ends; and
anchoring the exposed ends.
In another preferred form of the present invention, there is provided apparatus for closing a fissure in tissue, the apparatus comprising:
a filament comprising a distal end and a proximal end; and
a plurality of transverse anchors slidably mounted to said filament intermediate said distal and proximal ends;
the distal end of said filament being devoid of a stop.
In another preferred form of the present invention, there is provided apparatus for closing a fissure in tissue, the apparatus comprising:
a first filament having a distal end and a proximal end;
a pair of transverse anchors linked by a second filament; and
a pair of transverse anchors linked by a third filament;
said pair of transverse anchors linked by said second filament being slidably mounted to said first filament intermediate said distal and proximal ends of said first filament; and
said pair of transverse anchors linked by said third filament being slidably mounted to said first filament intermediate said distal and proximal ends of said first filament.
In another preferred form of the present invention, there is provided apparatus for closing a fissure in tissue, the apparatus comprising:
a first filament having a distal end and a proximal end;
a transverse anchor attached to said distal end of said first filament; and
a second filament attached to said proximal end of said first filament, said second filament being constructed to break upon the application of a predetermined amount of tension.
In another preferred form of the present invention, there is provided a method for closing a fissure in the annulus of an intervertebral disc, comprising:
providing a first transverse anchor having a first filament extending therefrom, and providing a second transverse anchor having a second filament extending therefrom;
advancing said first transverse anchor through the annulus of the intervertebral disc on one side of the fissure so that the first transverse anchor is disposed within the interior of the intervertebral disc and the first filament extends through the wall of the annulus on one side of the fissure, and advancing said second transverse anchor through the annulus of the intervertebral disc on a second side of the fissure so that the second transverse anchor is disposed within the interior of the intervertebral disc and the second filament extends through the wall of the annulus on the second side of the fissure, and applying tension to the first and second filaments so as to close the fissure; and
welding the first filament to the second filament.
In another preferred form of the present invention, there is provided a construct for closing a fissure in the annulus of an intervertebral disc, comprising:
a first transverse anchor having a first filament extending therefrom, and a second transverse anchor having a second filament extending therefrom;
said first filament being welded to said second filament.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will be more fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts, and further wherein:
For the purposes of clarity of description, the present invention will hereinafter generally be discussed in the context of closing a tear or fissure formed in the posterior annulus of an intervertebral disc, however, it should be appreciated that the present invention is also applicable to closing a tear or fissure formed in another portion of the annulus of an intervertebral disc, or to closing a tear or fissure or other opening formed in another anatomical structure, etc.
The proximal and distal portions of the holes 111 in transverse anchor components 102, 104, 106, 108 are preferably beveled, or have rounded edges, so as to reduce friction between flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 and the transverse anchor components 102, 104, 106, 108, and so as to reduce the risk of the edges of the holes 111 cutting the flexible longitudinal fixation component 110. The transverse anchor components 102, 104, 106, 108 are preferably cylindrical, but may be elongate with a non-circular cross-section in alternative embodiments of the invention. For example, such transverse anchor components 102, 104, 106, 108 may have triangular, square, hexagonal or other shapes in cross-section. Two or more transverse anchor components 102, 104, 106, 108 (e.g., 4 to 8 such transverse anchor components) may be provided for each flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 in alternative embodiments of the invention.
The transverse anchor components 102, 104, 106, 108 may be made of titanium, tantalum, stainless steel, polypropylene, Delrin, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or any other suitable material. By way of example but not limitation, the transverse anchor components 102, 104, 106, 108 may be made of molded PEEK.
The flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 is preferably formed out of weldable suture, e.g., size 2-0 to #4 non-absorbable suture, and most preferably size #2 or #3 weldable suture. By way of example but not limitation, the flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 may be made of size #2 bicomposite braided polyester weldable suture of the type provided by Tornier (Edina, Minn.). The flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 is preferably about 40 to 120 centimeters long, and most preferably about 70 to 95 centimeters long.
In
Thus it will be seen that axial tension applied to the distal end 134 of the flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 and the central portion 136 of the flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 pulls the first and second transverse anchor components 102, 104 against the inner surface of the posterior annulus, and axial tension applied to the proximal end 132 of the flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 and the central portion 136 of the flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 pulls the third and fourth transverse anchor components 106, 108 against the inner surface of the posterior annulus. Again, this tension should be applied axially (i.e., substantially perpendicular to the posterior wall of the annulus), and at a substantial level (e.g., at about 15 N to 25 N), in order to ensure proper seating of the transverse anchor components 102, 104, 106, 108 against the inner surface of the posterior annulus. Once the transverse anchor components 102, 104, and the transverse anchor components 106, 108, have been properly seated against the inner surface of the posterior annulus (i.e., once the transverse anchor components 102, 104, 106, 108 have been “pre-tensioned”), the distal and proximal ends 134, 132 of the flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 may be drawn together (e.g., with a lateral force of about 15 N to 25 N, directed substantially parallel to the posterior wall of the annulus) so as to draw the fissure F closed, and then the distal and proximal ends 134, 132 of the flexible longitudinal fixation component 110 may be locked together as shown in
More particularly,
Again, as described above in connection with the description of
Thus it will be seen that, with the present invention, a filament (e.g., the flexible longitudinal fixation component 110) is used to laterally span a tear, fissure or other defect in the annulus, with one portion of the filament being anchored to the annulus by passing at least one first anchor (e.g., a transverse anchor component) through the annulus and into the nucleus on one side of the fissure, and with a second portion of the filament being anchored to the annulus by passing at least one second anchor (e.g., a transverse anchor component) through the annulus and into the nucleus on a second side of the fissure, with the at least one first and second anchors being drawn back through the nucleus and against the inner surface of the posterior annulus by the application of a significant (e.g., about 15 N to 25 N) axial tension applied perpendicular to the posterior wall of the annulus (i.e., by a “pre-tension”), and with the fissure being drawn closed by the subsequent application of a significant (e.g., about 15 N to 25 N) lateral tension applied parallel to the posterior wall of the annulus (i.e., by a “closing tension”), and with the free ends of the filament thereafter being secured to one another (e.g., by welding) so as to hold the fissure closed.
Thus, with this form of the invention, two separate flexible longitudinal fixation components (e.g., filaments) 610A, 610B are provided, each with its own transverse anchor component (e.g., bar anchor) 602, 604, with the two flexible longitudinal fixation components 610A, 610B being united with one another only after their associated transverse anchor components 602, 604 have been set in the disc.
In accordance with the present invention, axial tensile forces of about 6 N to 60 N or more are applied to the flexible longitudinal fixation components 610A, 610B generally perpendicular to the posterior surface of the annulus in the direction A (
Ten devices similar to that shown in
High strength sutures were placed under the welded flexible longitudinal fixation components 610A, 610B and the sutures were pulled up to 15 N with a MTS machine while that machine recorded axial displacement. Average displacements of 10.340 mm and 5.526 mm were recorded for the non-axial pre-tensioned and the axial pre-tensioned groups, respectively. In other words, the transverse anchor components 602, 604 of the non-axial pre-tensioned group moved about twice as much as the transverse anchor components 602, 604 of the axial pre-tensioned groups. That difference was highly significant (P=0.006). Axial cross-sections of discs D after testing showed that the transverse anchor components 602, 604 of all devices were pulled through disc tissue towards the posterior of the annulus of all specimens. The findings show axial pretension forces of about 25 N before applying lateral tension forces of about 15 N in a plane generally perpendicular to the axial pre-tension forces, for example with welding tools or other locking mechanisms or devices, pulls the transverse anchor components 602, 604 towards the inner surface of the posterior annulus before the flexible longitudinal fixation components 610A, 610B are locked together. This helps maintain tension on the locked flexible longitudinal fixation components 610A, 610B and prevents or minimizes slack from occurring in the locked flexible longitudinal fixation components 610A, 610B. Such slack, which measured almost 5 mm in the test conducted, allows the edges of the previously-closed sides of the fissure F in annulus A to separate. Nucleus material N (or prosthetic devices deployed in the nucleus) more easily escapes through such opened fissures.
It was also discovered that the axial pre-tension forces applied generally perpendicular to the posterior surface of the disc D should be followed by a preferably 10 N to 40 N lateral tension (or higher) applied parallel to the posterior surface of the annulus (i.e., the axial pre-tension forces should be followed by a lateral closing tension). The first, “pre-tension” force pulls the transverse anchor components 602, 604 towards the inner surface of the annulus. The second, “lateral closing” tension force holds the transverse anchor components 602, 604 in that location and pulls or holds the edges of the annulus, on the two sides of the fissure, together. The second lateral closing tension force is most preferably about 15 N to 25 N.
In a separate test, it was determined that the force required to push a 4 mm spherical probe through fissures closed with the apparatus 601 (welded after applying about a 25 N axial pre-tension force followed by a 15 N lateral closing force applied perpendicular to the first axial tensile force) was 1.6 times higher than such force in fissures closed with devices locked with only a 6 N lateral tensile force and without applying an axial pre-tension force. The force required to push such probes through fissures closed with the apparatus 601 (locked after applying both the axial pre-tension force and the lateral closing force) were 4.04 times that of control (P=0.014), while such force was 2.47 times that of control for devices locked with only the 6 N lateral tensile force and without an axial pre-tension force (P=0.401).
It was also discovered that the transverse anchor components 602, 604 should preferably be inserted 6 to 10 millimeters into discs D so as to minimize the distance that the transverse anchor components 602, 204 had to be pulled through the nucleus N so as to arrive against the inner surface of the annulus. Depth stops on the sides of the needle-like insertion device used to insert the transverse anchor components 602, 604 into discs D should preferably be located 7 to 11 millimeters proximal to the distal ends or tips of the needle-like insertion device so as to ensure the desired insertion depth.
It should be appreciated that with the construction shown in
The ends of the longer flexible longitudinal fixation component 710A, 710B are preferably loaded into the jaws of a welding device W (Tornier, Edina Minn.) as seen in
A second flexible longitudinal fixation component 811 may be attached to the proximal end of the handle component 803. A second handle component 805 is preferably attached to the proximal end of the second flexible longitudinal fixation component 811. The second handle component 805 is pulled to pull the anchor component 802 against the inner surface of the posterior annulus. The second flexible longitudinal fixation component 811 preferably breaks at about 15 N to 40 N of tension or more. Alternatively, the first handle 803 could break from the proximal end of the flexible longitudinal fixation component 810 at such preferred force, which eliminates the need for the second handle component 805.
The handle component 803 helps surgeons apply the preferred axial pretension force without exceeding such force, which could injure the annulus or break the flexible longitudinal fixation component 810.
Alternative methods or devices may be used to facilitate the application of tension in an axial direction on the flexible longitudinal fixation component 810. For example, as seen in
More particularly,
A bead 940 is seen near the proximal end of the flexible longitudinal fixation component 910. Knots 911 in the flexible longitudinal fixation component 910, proximal and distal to the bead 940, keep the bead 940 near the proximal end of the flexible longitudinal fixation component 910. Tension on the bead 940, after placing the transverse anchor component into the disc, pulls the transverse anchor component in the first direction and against an inner layer of the posterior annulus. The bead 940 may preferably slide over the knot 911 just proximal to the bead 940 when sufficient force is applied to the bead.
A projection 923 is seen on the side of the handle 924 of the needle-like insertion device 901. The projection 923 is attached to the stylet (not shown) within the needle-like insertion device. Axial rotation of the stylet enables advancement of the stylet in a distal direction, much like a bolt-action gun, which forces the transverse anchor component from the needle-like insertion device. Alternatively, a projection from the stylet could extend through the proximal end of the handle 924 of the needle-like insertion device. Like a ballpoint pen, pressure on the projection 923 could advance a spring-loaded stylet, which forces the transverse anchor component from the needle-like insertion device 901.
It should be understood that many additional changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangements of parts, which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the present invention, may be made by those skilled in the art while still remaining within the principles and scope of the invention.
This patent application is a continuation of pending prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/464,533, filed May 4, 2012 by Bret A. Ferree for METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CLOSING FISSURES IN THE ANNULUS FIBROSUS, which in turn: (1) is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/263,753, filed Nov. 3, 2008 by Bret A. Ferree for METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ANULUS REPAIR, which in turn: (i) is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/811,751, filed Jun. 12, 2007 by Bret A. Ferree for DEVICES FOR DISC HERNIATION REPAIR AND METHODS OF USE, which patent application claims benefit of (a) prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/813,232, filed Jun. 13, 2006 by Bret A. Ferree, and (b) prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/847,649, filed Sep. 26, 2006 by Bret A. Ferree; and (ii) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/984,657, filed Nov. 1, 2007 by Bret A. Ferree; (2) is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/297,789, filed Nov. 16, 2011 by Bret A. Ferree for APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR CLOSURE OF FISSURES IN THE ANULUS FIBROSIS, which patent application claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/414,186, filed Nov. 16, 2010 by Bret A. Ferree; and (3) claims benefit of prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/483,204, filed May 6, 2011 by Bret A. Ferree for APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR CLOSURE OF FISSURES IN THE ANULUS FIBROSIS. The above-identified patent applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3867728 | Stubstad et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
4349921 | Kuntz | Sep 1982 | A |
4413359 | Akiyama et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4502161 | Wall | Mar 1985 | A |
4512338 | Balko et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4532926 | O'Holla | Aug 1985 | A |
4585458 | Kurland | Apr 1986 | A |
4662068 | Polonsky | May 1987 | A |
4663358 | Hyon et al. | May 1987 | A |
4665906 | Jervis | May 1987 | A |
4741330 | Hayhurst | May 1988 | A |
4744364 | Kensey | May 1988 | A |
4772287 | Ray et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4781190 | Lee | Nov 1988 | A |
4798205 | Bonomo et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4834757 | Brantigan | May 1989 | A |
4852568 | Kensey | Aug 1989 | A |
4863477 | Monson | Sep 1989 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4890612 | Kensey | Jan 1990 | A |
4904260 | Ray et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4911718 | Lee et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917704 | Frey et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4932969 | Frey et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4946378 | Hirayama et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955908 | Frey et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5002576 | Fuhrmann et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5015255 | Kuslich | May 1991 | A |
5021059 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035716 | Downey | Jul 1991 | A |
5047055 | Bao et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053046 | Janese | Oct 1991 | A |
5059206 | Winters | Oct 1991 | A |
5061274 | Kensey | Oct 1991 | A |
5071437 | Steffee | Dec 1991 | A |
5100422 | Berguer et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108438 | Stone | Apr 1992 | A |
5116357 | Eberbach | May 1992 | A |
5122155 | Eberbach | Jun 1992 | A |
5123926 | Pisharodi | Jun 1992 | A |
5141515 | Eberbach | Aug 1992 | A |
5147374 | Fernandez | Sep 1992 | A |
5171259 | Inoue | Dec 1992 | A |
5171278 | Pisharodi | Dec 1992 | A |
5171280 | Baumgartner | Dec 1992 | A |
5171281 | Parsons et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176692 | Wilk et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192326 | Bao et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5222974 | Kensey et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5254133 | Seid | Oct 1993 | A |
5258000 | Gianturco | Nov 1993 | A |
5258043 | Stone | Nov 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5282827 | Kensey et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5304194 | Chee et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306311 | Stone et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312435 | Nash et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318780 | Viegas et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320633 | Allen et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320644 | Baumgartner | Jun 1994 | A |
5342393 | Stack | Aug 1994 | A |
5342394 | Matsuno et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5356432 | Rutkow et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366460 | Eberbach | Nov 1994 | A |
5368602 | De La Torre | Nov 1994 | A |
5370660 | Weinstein et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370697 | Baumgartner | Dec 1994 | A |
5376693 | Viegas et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383477 | Dematteis | Jan 1995 | A |
5383905 | Golds | Jan 1995 | A |
5390683 | Pisharodi | Feb 1995 | A |
5397331 | Himpens et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5397332 | Kammerer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5405360 | Tovey | Apr 1995 | A |
5425772 | Brantigan | Jun 1995 | A |
5425773 | Boyd et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437631 | Janzen | Aug 1995 | A |
5456720 | Schultz et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464407 | Mcguire | Nov 1995 | A |
5500000 | Feagin et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5507754 | Green et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5514180 | Heggeness et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531759 | Kensey et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534028 | Bao et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534030 | Navarro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540715 | Katsaros et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545178 | Kensey et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545229 | Parsons et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549617 | Green et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549679 | Kuslich | Aug 1996 | A |
5556428 | Shah | Sep 1996 | A |
5556429 | Felt | Sep 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562736 | Ray et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562738 | Boyd et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569252 | Justin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571189 | Kuslich | Nov 1996 | A |
5582616 | Bolduc et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587175 | Viegas et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591223 | Lock et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5613974 | Andreas et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620012 | Benderev et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624463 | Stone et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626613 | Schmieding | May 1997 | A |
5634931 | Kugel | Jun 1997 | A |
5645084 | McKay | Jul 1997 | A |
5645597 | Krapiva | Jul 1997 | A |
5658343 | Hauselmann et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662683 | Kay | Sep 1997 | A |
5669935 | Rosenman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674294 | Bainville et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674296 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676698 | Janzen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676701 | Yuan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681310 | Yuan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681351 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683465 | Shinn et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690674 | Diaz | Nov 1997 | A |
5695525 | Mulhauser et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702450 | Bisserie | Dec 1997 | A |
5702451 | Biedermann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702454 | Baumgartner | Dec 1997 | A |
5702462 | Oberlander | Dec 1997 | A |
5709854 | Griffith-Cima et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716408 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716409 | Debbas | Feb 1998 | A |
5716413 | Walter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716416 | Lin | Feb 1998 | A |
5718862 | Thompson | Feb 1998 | A |
5725577 | Saxon | Mar 1998 | A |
5728150 | McDonald et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730744 | Justin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733337 | Carr, Jr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5743917 | Saxon | Apr 1998 | A |
5746755 | Wood et al. | May 1998 | A |
5746765 | Kleshinski et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766246 | Mulhauser et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769864 | Kugel | Jun 1998 | A |
5769893 | Shah | Jun 1998 | A |
5772661 | Michelson | Jun 1998 | A |
5776183 | Kanesaka et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782844 | Yoon et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785705 | Baker | Jul 1998 | A |
5800549 | Bao et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800550 | Sertich | Sep 1998 | A |
5801033 | Hubbell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810851 | Yoon | Sep 1998 | A |
5823994 | Sharkey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824008 | Bolduc et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824082 | Brown | Oct 1998 | A |
5824093 | Ray et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824094 | Serhan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827298 | Hart et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827328 | Buttermann | Oct 1998 | A |
5836315 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843084 | Hart et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5846261 | Kotula et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860425 | Benderev et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860977 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865845 | Thalgott | Feb 1999 | A |
5865846 | Bryan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879366 | Shaw et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888220 | Felt et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888226 | Rogozinski | Mar 1999 | A |
5893889 | Harrington | Apr 1999 | A |
5916225 | Kugel | Jun 1999 | A |
5919235 | Husson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5928284 | Mehdizadeh | Jul 1999 | A |
5935147 | Kensey et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954716 | Sharkey et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954767 | Pajotin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957939 | Heaven et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5972000 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972007 | Sheffield et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972022 | Huxel | Oct 1999 | A |
5976174 | Ruiz | Nov 1999 | A |
5976186 | Bao et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980504 | Sharkey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001130 | Bryan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007570 | Sharkey et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007575 | Samuels | Dec 1999 | A |
6019793 | Perren et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024754 | Engelson | Feb 2000 | A |
6027527 | Asano et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6126682 | Sharkey et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140452 | Felt et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146380 | Racz et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6180848 | Flament et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183518 | Ross et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206921 | Guagliano et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224630 | Bao et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245107 | Ferree | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6371990 | Ferree | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402750 | Atkinson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425919 | Lambrecht | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428576 | Haldimann | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436143 | Ross et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6482235 | Lambrecht et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6511491 | Grudem et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6733531 | Trieu | May 2004 | B1 |
6878167 | Ferree | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7004970 | Cauthen, III et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7201774 | Ferree | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7338525 | Ferree | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7947080 | Ferree | May 2011 | B2 |
20020123750 | Eisermann et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020198599 | Haldimann | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030074075 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114930 | Lim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030158604 | Cauthen, III | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040260397 | Lambrecht et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050125071 | Nahleili | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143826 | Zucherman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050261710 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060217747 | Ferree | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070067040 | Ferree | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070135920 | Ferree | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070167951 | Ainsworth et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070276494 | Ferree | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288040 | Ferree | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080177298 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080243249 | Kohm et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100016889 | Ferree | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100069957 | Abuzaina et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110034975 | Ferree | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0700671 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0722700 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0277678 | Aug 1998 | EP |
1719463 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1787604 | May 2007 | EP |
2639823 | Jun 1990 | FR |
WO 9531946 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9534331 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9726847 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9730638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9817190 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9820939 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9834552 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9900074 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9902108 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9902214 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9903422 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9930651 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9947058 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9961084 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9961840 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 9962439 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0042953 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0062832 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0110316 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0110318 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0121246 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0128464 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0145577 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 2010062971 | Jun 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wilke, H. et al., New In Vivo Measurements of Pressures in the Intervertebral Disc in Daily Life, Spine, 24(8): 755-762, Nov. 8, 1999. |
Proceedings 14th Annual meeting North American Spine Society, Oct. 1999. |
Proceedings 13th Annual Meeting North American Spine Society, Oct. 1998. |
Goel, V.K., et al., “Mechanical Properties of Lumbar Spinal Motion Segments as Affected by Partial Disc Removal,” Spine, 11(10): 1008-1012, (1986). |
Ahlgren, B.D., et al., “Anular Incision Technique on the Strength and Multidirectional Flexibility of the Healing Intervertebral Disc,” Spine, 19(8): 948-954, (1994). |
Barr, J.S., “Ruptured Intervertebral Disc and Sciatic Pain,” J. of Bone and Joint Surgery, 29, (2): 429-437 (1947). |
Postacchini, F., “Spine Update Results of Surgery Compared With Conservative Management for Lumbar Disc Herniations,” Spine, 21 (11): 1383-1387, (1996). |
Rogers, L.A., “Experience with Limited versus Extensive Disc Removal in Patients Undergoing Microsurgical Operations for Rupertured Lumbar Discs,” Neurosurgery, 22 (1): 82-85, (1988). |
Brinckmann, P., et al., “Change of Disc Height, Radial Disc Bulge, and Intradiscal Pressure From Discectomy an in Vitro Investigation on Human Lumbar Discs,” Spine, 16(6): 641-646, (1991). |
Balderston, R.A., et al., “The Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Simple Fragment Excision Versus Disc Space Curettage,” J. of Spinal Disorders, 4(1): 22-25 (1991). |
Hanley, E.N., Jr., et al., “The Development of Low-Back Pain after Excision of a Lumbar Disc,” J. of Bone and Joint Surgery, 71A(5): 719-721, (1989). |
Tulberg, T., et al., “Incision of the Annulus Fibrosus Induces Nerve Root Morphologic, Vascular and Functional Changes,” Spine, 18(7): 843-850, (1993). |
Heggeness, M.H., et al., “Discography of Lumbar Discs After Surgical Treatment for Disc Herniation,” Spine, 22(14): 1606-1609, (1997). |
Kayama, S., et al, “Incision of the Anulus Fibrosus Induces Nerve Root Morphologic Vascular and Functional Changes,” Spine, 21(22): 2539-2543, (1996). |
Yasargil, M.G., “Microsurgical Operation of Herniated Lumbar Disc,” p. 81, 1977. |
Tibrewal, S.B., et al., “Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Heights in Normal Subjects and Patients with Disc Herniation,” Spine, 10 (5): 452-454, (1985). |
Cauthen, Joseph, C., M.D., “Microsurgical Annular Reconstruction (Annuloplasty) Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy; Preliminary Report of a New Technique,” Abstract for Poster Presentation, AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves Annual Meeting, 1999. |
Husson, J. et al., Inter-Somatic Nucleoplasty by Posterior Path During Disectomy, Concept and Experimental Study, 1998. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160361053 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60813232 | Jun 2006 | US | |
60847649 | Sep 2006 | US | |
60984657 | Nov 2007 | US | |
61414186 | Nov 2010 | US | |
61483204 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13464533 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14993391 | US | |
Parent | 12263753 | Nov 2008 | US |
Child | 13464533 | US | |
Parent | 11811751 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 12263753 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13297789 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13464533 | US |