1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to communicating with an electronic engine control for an engine of a motor vehicle. More specifically, the invention relates to engine control and calibration by communicating with the electronic engine control of an engine of a motor vehicle.
2. Description of the Related Art
Electronics have enhanced the control over every function of the motor vehicle. The internal combustion engine has also been enhanced. This is because the electronics more precisely control the operation of the internal combustion engine. The controls can be used to from determining how much fuel is to be consumed down to limiting the output produced based on the emissions during a particular operation.
Many enthusiasts and those that tinker (“enthusiasts”) are reluctant to embrace the electronic technologies. The enthusiasts often consider their motor vehicles works in flux. The motor vehicles are constantly being tuned, enhanced and/or modified all to add any amount of horsepower available. When an internal combustion engine is controlled electronically, the electronic controls require changing. This presents many problems.
A primary problem is the inflexibility of an electronic control system. Often times, an electronic control system may only work with a specific hardware and engine configurations. Therefore, in order for an enthusiast to tweak the performance of the motor vehicle, any number of working parts, either electronic hardware or internal combustion engine parts, must be replaced. This adds cost and time to any enhancement.
A secondary problem is the actual work required to make such changes. The swapping of electronic components, especially the electronic control system, requires a great deal of knowledge with respect to how the other components, mechanical and electrical, interact with each other. This may require additional training or the hiring of a specialist.
A third problem with the electronic control systems of the prior art is their inability to communicate with remote computing devices. In many instances, it is desirable to communicate remotely with the electronic control system of a motor vehicle while it is operating to make changes to parameters allowing the remote operator to view how the outputs of the internal combustion engine change with varying the input parameters. Currently, the only way to make such changes is to install a computer onboard and hardwire it to a modified electronic control system. This type of set up typically converts the passenger seat into a computer stand and requires the driver to divert some attention away from the road. It also requires the driver to have a working knowledge of how to operate the computer and/or the electronic control system.
An engine control assembly for an internal combustion engine of a motor vehicle is disclosed. The engine control assembly includes a controller that is disposed adjacent the internal combustion engine. The controller includes an output port and provides control signals to operate the internal combustion engine at the output port. The engine control assembly also includes a remote communicator in communication with said controller. The remote communicator transmits signals from the controller to a remotely located computer. Signals may then be received from the remotely located computer and transmitted to the controller from the engine control unit allowing the controller to modify the control signals transmitted to the internal combustion engine.
Other advantages of the invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to
Referring to
Attached to the ECU 14 is a remote communicator, generally shown at 32. The remote communicator 32 receives data from the ECU 14 and transmits the data to a remote location. Typically, the remote location would be a computer in a lab or in a pit area of a racetrack. The remote communicator 32 may include a modem 34, a network connection (not shown), an antenna 36 or a cell phone (not shown) and a protocol allowing the remote communicator 32 to communicate with ECU 14. While infrared and radio frequency communications are contemplated, electrical signals transmitted through at least one conductor 38 between the modem 34 and the ECU 14 are used in the preferred embodiment. In the embodiment shown, there are two conductors 38 extending between the ECU 14 and the modem 34. These two conductors 38 could represent an RS-232 interface or they may be a dedicated connection. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the list of modes of communication listed above is exemplary in nature and not exhaustive. Other methods of communication may be used without extending out of the scope of the invention.
The modem 34 operates by standing in a wait loop. When the modem 34 receives a request, data is received after the ECU 14 identifies the data being requested and transmits the data to the modem 34. The block of data is then sent remotely using the modem 34 and antenna 36. The modem 34 sends a block or frame of data at a time. The modem 34 is capable, through the commands it receives from the remote computer, of requesting data on the status of parameters, the condition of the internal combustion engine 10 or the condition and state of the ECU 14. The modem 34 is also capable of receiving commands required to modify the performance of the internal combustion engine 10.
Referring to
Once identified, the remote computer and the engine control unit 14 are connected electronically to communicate therebetween at 48. In order for this to happen, the engine control unit 14 must be in a server mode. Server mode as used herein means that the engine control unit 14 has resources available to receive inputs external thereto and are able to act in some way on those inputs.
The engine control unit 14 and the remote computer are then synchronized at 50. This allows the remote operator to control the engine control unit 14 as if the operator were local to the engine control unit 14. In this mode, the local operator of the internal combustion engine 10 may or may not be able to view the changes being made or parameters being viewed by the remote operator. The local and remote operators may, however, communicate through a chat window.
After the two computing devices are synchronized, new parameters or data may be transmitted to the ECU 14 at 52 or, alternatively, the remote computer may receive data from the ECU 14 at 54.
These two steps 52, 54 allow the remote computer to view outputs of the internal combustion engine 10 or change parameters associated with inputs or conditions of the internal combustion engine 10.
The current parameters and values are save in the ECU 14 at 56. The control of the ECU 14 as well as the internal combustion engine 10 are returned thereto at 58. Communication is terminated at 60 allowing the ECU 14 to return to its normal mode of operation.
A method for enhancing the ECU 14 is described. The method requires the use of the remote communicator 34. In the alternative, a more traditional port 40 may be used. The port 40 shown in
The ECU 14 is capable, however, of monitoring these features. If, in the future, the user of the partially disabled ECU 14 would like to maximize the functionality of the ECU 14, software capable of enabling the ECU 14 may be operated. More specifically, because the ECU 14 is capable of communicating with other electronic devices via the RS-232 port 40 and the remote communicator 32, the ECU 14 can receive commands exteriorly therefrom to enable previously disabled functions of the ECU 14. This allows for greater flexibility and reduced maintenance in switching out or replacing ECUs 14 based on the needs of the user thereof.
Certain functions are turned off or on by changing a value in a specific address. In other situations, a value being reviewed by a specific feature may be unnaturally tied to a particular value, i.e., zero, effectively keeping a function from operating. If the software introduced to the ECU 14 changed the value in the specific address, the function may be turned on. Likewise, if the value in a specific address were no longer identified as a particular value and were able to be a variable representing a natural state of a particular device, then the function of the ECU 14 may be turned on.
Referring to
After synchronization, the operator of the remote computer changes the settings in the ECU 14 at 70. The settings that are changed allow for the additional functionality in the ECU 14 not previous available to the local operator of the motor vehicle.
In addition, should the enhancements to the ECU 14 functionality require, initial parameters are transmitted to the ECU 14 for those additional functions at 72. After the additional features are initialized with proper settings and/or values, the control of the ECU 14 is returned to the local operator at 74 and communication therebetween is terminated at 76. While not discussed, it should be appreciated that features may be disenabled in a fashion similar to that which is discussed above without extending beyond the scope of the inventive method.
The invention has been described in an illustrative manner. It is to be understood that the terminology, which has been used, is intended to be in the nature of words of description rather than of limitation.
Many modifications and variations of the invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application No. 60/175,038 filed Jan. 7, 2000.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US01/00496 | 1/8/2001 | WO | 00 | 8/26/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/52070 | 7/19/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5398190 | Wortham | Mar 1995 | A |
5732074 | Spaur et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5826205 | Koelle et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5884210 | Rettig et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5938716 | Shutty et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6081755 | Fujimoto | Jun 2000 | A |
6108598 | Sumitani | Aug 2000 | A |
6112152 | Tuttle | Aug 2000 | A |
6480098 | Flick | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6760659 | Cowen | Jul 2004 | B1 |
20030214392 | Flick | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 919 419 | Feb 1999 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040039515 A1 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60175038 | Jan 2000 | US |