The present disclosure relates generally to music composition and, more specifically, to a system and method for computer generated music using analysis of tonal and rhythmic structures.
Certain applications, such as music-on-hold systems, utilize computer-generated music, primarily to avoid either the payment of copyright royalties or the payment to a composer or songwriter for the rights to a custom-made song. Such computer-created music, however pleasant, typically is simple and becomes uninteresting to listeners after only a short time. Methods are needed that will improve the quality and complexity of computer generated music.
Accordingly, in one aspect, a method of automating the generation of musical compositions is disclosed, comprising the steps of: (1) generating a first musical structure from a random list of possible musical structures; (2) generating a second musical structure based on analysis of first representation of said first musical structure; wherein said first representation of said first musical structure is generated according to a method comprising the steps of: (a) labeling the perimeter of a circle with twelve labels corresponding to twelve respective notes in an octave, such that moving clockwise or counter-clockwise between adjacent ones of said labels represents a musical half-step; (b) identifying an occurrence of a first one of the twelve notes within said musical structure; (c) identifying an occurrence of a second one of the twelve notes within said musical structure; (d) identifying a first label corresponding to the first note; (e) identifying a second label corresponding to the second note; (f) creating a first line connecting the first label and the second label, wherein: (1) said first line is a first color if the first note and the second note are separated by a half step; (2) said first line is a second color if the first note and the second note are separated by a whole step; (3) said first line is a third color if the first note and the second note are separated by a minor third; (4) said first line is a fourth color if the first note and the second note are separated by a major third; (5) said first line is a fifth color if the first note and the second note are separated by a perfect fourth; and (6) said first line is a sixth color if the first note and the second note are separated by a tri-tone.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiment illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, and alterations and modifications in the illustrated device, and further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein are herein contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
Before describing the method and apparatus for computer generated music, a summary of the above-referenced music tonal and rhythmic visualization methods will be presented. The tonal visualization methods are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/827,264 filed Jul. 11, 2007 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Visualizing Music and Other Sounds” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
There are three traditional scales or ‘patterns’ of musical tone that have developed over the centuries. These three scales, each made up of seven notes, have become the foundation for virtually all musical education in the modern world. There are, of course, other scales, and it is possible to create any arbitrary pattern of notes that one may desire; but the vast majority of musical sound can still be traced back to these three primary scales.
Each of the three main scales is a lopsided conglomeration of seven intervals:
Major scale: 2 steps, 2 steps, 1 step, 2 steps, 2 steps, 2 steps, 1 step
Harmonic Minor Scale: 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 3, 1
Melodic Minor Scale: 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1
Unfortunately, our traditional musical notation system has also been based upon the use of seven letters (or note names) to correspond with the seven notes of the scale: A, B, C, D, E, F and G. The problem is that, depending on which of the three scales one is using, there are actually twelve possible tones to choose from in the ‘pool’ of notes used by the three scales. Because of this discrepancy, the traditional system of musical notation has been inherently lopsided at its root.
With a circle of twelve tones and only seven note names, there are (of course) five missing note names. To compensate, the traditional system of music notation uses a somewhat arbitrary system of ‘sharps’ (#'s) and ‘flats’ (b's) to cover the remaining five tones so that a single notation system can be used to encompass all three scales. For example, certain key signatures will have seven ‘pure letter’ tones (like ‘A’) in addition to sharp or flat tones (like C# or Gb), depending on the key signature. This leads to a complex system of reading and writing notes on a staff, where one has to mentally juggle a key signature with various accidentals (sharps and flats) that are then added one note at a time. The result is that the seven-note scale, which is a lopsided entity, is presented as a straight line on the traditional musical notation staff. On the other hand, truly symmetrical patterns (such as the chromatic scale) are represented in a lopsided manner on the traditional musical staff. All of this inefficiency stems from the inherent flaw of the traditional written system being based upon the seven note scales instead of the twelve-tone circle.
To overcome this inefficiency, a set of mathematically based, color-coded MASTER KEY™ diagrams is presented to better explain the theory and structures of music using geometric form and the color spectrum. As shown in
The next ‘generation’ of the MASTER KEY™ diagrams involves thinking in terms of two note ‘intervals.’ The Interval diagram, shown in
Another important aspect of the MASTER KEY™ diagrams is the use of color. Because there are six basic music intervals, the six basic colors of the rainbow can be used to provide another way to comprehend the basic structures of music. In a preferred embodiment, the interval line 12 for a half step is colored red, the interval line 14 for a whole step is colored orange, the interval line 16 for a minor third is colored yellow, the interval line 18 for a major third is colored green, the interval line 20 for a perfect fourth is colored blue, and the interval line 22 for a tri-tone is colored purple. In other embodiments, different color schemes may be employed. What is desirable is that there is a gradated color spectrum assigned to the intervals so that they may be distinguished from one another by the use of color, which the human eye can detect and process very quickly.
The next group of MASTER KEY™ diagrams pertains to extending the various intervals 12-22 to their completion around the twelve-tone circle 10. This concept is illustrated in
The next generation of MASTER KEY™ diagrams is based upon musical shapes that are built with three notes. In musical terms, three note structures are referred to as triads. There are only four triads in all of diatonic music, and they have the respective names of major, minor, diminished, and augmented. These four, three-note shapes are represented in the MASTER KEY™ diagrams as different sized triangles, each built with various color coded intervals. As shown in
The next group of MASTER KEY™ diagrams are developed from four notes at a time. Four note chords, in music, are referred to as seventh chords, and there are nine types of seventh chords.
Every musical structure that has been presented thus far in the MASTER KEY™ system, aside from the six basic intervals, has come directly out of three main scales. Again, the three main scales are as follows: the Major Scale, the Harmonic-Minor Scale, and the Melodic-Minor Scale. The major scale is the most common of the three main scales and is heard virtually every time music is played or listened to in the western world. As shown in
The previously described diagrams have been shown in two dimensions; however, music is not a circle as much as it is a helix. Every twelfth note (an octave) is one helix turn higher or lower than the preceding level. What this means is that music can be viewed not only as a circle but as something that will look very much like a DNA helix, specifically, a helix of approximately ten and one-half turns (i.e. octaves). There are only a small number of helix turns in the complete spectrum of audible sound; from the lowest auditory sound to the highest auditory sound. By using a helix instead of a circle, not only can the relative pitch difference between the notes be discerned, but the absolute pitch of the notes can be seen as well. For example,
The use of the helix becomes even more powerful when a single chord is repeated over multiple octaves. For example,
The above described MASTER KEY™ system provides a method for understanding the tonal information within musical compositions. Another method, however, is needed to deal with the rhythmic information, that is, the duration of each of the notes and relative time therebetween. Such rhythmic visualization methods are described in U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 12/023,375 filed Jan. 31, 2008 entitled “Device and Method for Visualizing Musical Rhythmic Structures” which is also hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In addition to being flawed in relation to tonal expression, traditional sheet music also has shortcomings with regards to rhythmic information. This becomes especially problematic for percussion instruments that, while tuned to a general frequency range, primarily contribute to the rhythmic structure of music. For example, traditional staff notation 1250, as shown in the upper portion of
The lower portion of
Because cymbals have a higher auditory frequency than drums, cymbal toroids have a resultantly larger diameter than any of the drums. Furthermore, the amorphous sound of a cymbal will, as opposed to the crisp sound of a snare, be visualized as a ring of varying thickness, much like the rings of a planet or a moon. The “splash” of the cymbal can then be animated as a shimmering effect within this toroid. In one embodiment, the shimmering effect can be achieved by randomly varying the thickness of the toroid at different points over the circumference of the toroid during the time period in which the cymbal is being sounded as shown by toroid 1204 and ring 1306 in
The spatial layout of the two dimensional side view shown in
The 3-D visualization of this Rhythmical Component as shown, for example, in
The two-dimensional view of
In other embodiments, each spheroid (whether it appears as such or as a circle or line) and each toroid (whether it appears as such or as a ring, line or bar) representing a beat when displayed on the graphical user interface will have an associated small “flag” or access control button. By mouse-clicking on one of these access controls, or by click-dragging a group of controls, a user will be able to highlight and access a chosen beat or series of beats. With a similar attachment to the Master Key™ music visualization software (available from Musical DNA LLC, Indianapolis, Ind.), it will become very easy for a user to link chosen notes and musical chords with certain beats and create entire musical compositions without the need to write music using standard notation. This will allow access to advanced forms of musical composition and musical interaction for musical amateurs around the world.
The present disclosure utilizes the previously described visualization methods as the basis for a system of computer generated music. As described above, diatonic music is structured so that certain notes or chords naturally follow other notes or chords; if this natural progression is not followed, the resulting music is dissonant and not enjoyable to hear. The unique tonal and rhythm visualization systems previously described provide a clear way to recognize these natural progressions of musical elements. This ability to “see” which elements fit within the acceptable range of successive musical elements is a significant characteristic of the visualization systems of the present disclosure. This ability can be implemented in software, for example, to allow a computer to create original and interesting music.
The digital music input device 1502 may include a MIDI (Musical Instrument Digital Interface) instrument coupled via a MIDI port with the processing device 1508, a digital music player such as an MP3 device or CD player, an analog music player, instrument or device with appropriate interface, transponder and analog-to-digital converter, or a digital music file, as well as other input devices and systems. As one non-limiting example, a piano keyboard with a MIDI interface may be connected to the processing device 1508 and the diagrams discussed herein may be displayed on the display 1510 as the keyboard is played. As another non-limiting example, a traditional analog instrument may be sensed by a microphone connected to an analog-digital-converter.
In addition to visualizing music played on an instrument through a MIDI interface, the system 1500 can implement software operating as a musical note extractor, thereby allowing the viewing of MP3 or other digitally formatted music. The note extractor examines the input digital music and determines the individual notes contained in the music. The various musical structures can optionally be used as basis or as “hints” for the system 1500 to use when generating compositions. The note extraction methods are described in U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/025,374 filed Feb. 1, 2008 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Visualization of Music Using Note Extraction” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The system 1500 can also be configured to receive musical input using the sheet music input device 1506. In certain embodiments, sheet music input device 1506 may comprise a scanner suitable for scanning printed sheet music. Using optical character recognition (OCR) or other methods known in the art, the system 1500 is able to convert the scanned sheet music into MIDI format or other mathematical data structures use in generating additional compositions.
The processing device 1508 may be implemented on a personal computer, a workstation computer, a laptop computer, a palmtop computer, a wireless terminal having computing capabilities (such as a cell phone having a Windows CE or Palm operating system), a game terminal, or the like. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other computer system architectures may also be employed.
In general, such a processing device 1508, when implemented using a computer, comprises a bus for communicating information, a processor coupled with the bus for processing information, a main memory coupled to the bus for storing information and instructions for the processor, a read-only memory coupled to the bus for storing static information and instructions for the processor. The display 1510 is coupled to the bus for displaying information for a computer user and the input devices 1512, 1514 are coupled to the bus for communicating information and command selections to the processor. A mass storage interface for communicating with data storage device 1509 containing digital information may also be included in processing device 1508 as well as a network interface for communicating with a network.
The processor may be any of a wide variety of general purpose processors or microprocessors such as the PENTIUM microprocessor manufactured by Intel Corporation, a POWER PC manufactured by IBM Corporation, a SPARC processor manufactured by Sun Corporation, or the like. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, however, that other varieties of processors may also be used in a particular computer system. Display 1510 may be a liquid crystal device (LCD), a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma monitor, a holographic display, or other suitable display device. The mass storage interface may allow the processor access to the digital information in the data storage devices via the bus. The mass storage interface may be a universal serial bus (USB) interface, an integrated drive electronics (IDE) interface, a serial advanced technology attachment (SATA) interface or the like, coupled to the bus for transferring information and instructions. The data storage device 1509 may be a conventional hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive, a flash device (such as a jump drive or SD card), an optical drive such as a compact disc (CD) drive, digital versatile disc (DVD) drive, HD DVD drive, BLUE-RAY DVD drive, or another magnetic, solid state, or optical data storage device, along with the associated medium (a floppy disk, a CD-ROM, a DVD, etc.)
In general, the processor retrieves processing instructions and data from the data storage device 1509 using the mass storage interface and downloads this information into random access memory for execution. The processor then executes an instruction stream from random access memory or read-only memory. Command selections and information that is input at input devices 1512, 1514 are used to direct the flow of instructions executed by the processor. Equivalent input devices 1514 may also be a pointing device such as a conventional trackball device. The results of this processing execution are then displayed on display device 1510.
The processing device 1508 is configured to generate an output for viewing on the display 1510 and/or for driving the printer 1516 to print a hardcopy. Preferably, the video output to display 1510 is also a graphical user interface, allowing the user to interact with the displayed information.
The system 1500 may optionally include one or more subsystems 1551 substantially similar to subsystem 1501 and communicating with subsystem 1501 via a network 1550, such as a LAN, WAN or the internet. Subsystems 1501 and 1551 may be configured to act as a web server, a client or both and will preferably be browser enabled. Thus with system 1500, remote composition and music exchange may occur between users.
In operation, system 1500 may randomly select a note or chord as the beginning musical element. In certain embodiments, the user may enter an initial chord progression upon which the system will base additional compositions. In further embodiments, the user may indicate a desired genre (e.g., rock, jazz, classical, etc.) for the composition. However, the present disclosure contemplates that the system 1500 can initiate compositions automatically. Processing device 1508 then creates tonal and rhythm visualization components from the initial note, chord, or rhythm pattern chosen. For example, if the initial chord is a C major seventh chord, the system will choose successive chords that are in the key of C major, and perhaps choose jazz or easy listening as the genre due the presence of the major seventh note. When choosing the third chord, the system 1500 can then consider both the first and second chords to determine an acceptable chord that fits musically with the first two chords.
The system may also choose a first melody note based on random selection from notes in the key signature of the first chord, with successive notes being chosen based on intervals and rhythms common to the selected genre. The visualization components are illustratively represented in encoded or digital form for use by system 1500, which selects successive note and chords, or a new rhythm pattern. The chords and rhythm patterns selected will fall within the acceptable sound of music that is considered to be within the music genre that has been selected by the user or the system 1500. Such chords and rhythm patterns that are acceptable within the selected music genre may be previously stored in storage device 1509. System 1500 continues to “compose” by selecting musical elements until a predetermined song length has been reached, or the user terminates the operation of the system 1500. The created music may be stored or recorded on removable media that are compatible with data storage device 1509. System 1500 can therefore create or compose music that is sufficiently musically complex to be “listenable” for long periods of time.
Remote subsystem 1551, which is substantially similar to subsystem 1501, can be used to send and receive control data or music signals via network 1550. This allows a user to initiate or terminate operation of subsystem 1501 from a remote location.
While the disclosure has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiments have been shown and described and that all changes, modifications and equivalents that come within the spirit of the disclosure provided herein are desired to be protected. The articles “a,” “an,” “said,” and “the” are not limited to a singular element, and may include one or more such elements.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/912,978, filed Apr. 20, 2007, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Computer Generated Music.” This application also relates to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/830,386 filed Jul. 12, 2006 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Visualizing Musical Notation”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/827,264 filed Jul. 11, 2007 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Visualizing Music and Other Sounds”, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/921,578, filed Apr. 3, 2007, entitled “Device and Method for Visualizing Musical Rhythmic Structures”, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/023,375 filed Jan. 31, 2008 entitled “Device and Method for Visualizing Musical Rhythmic Structures”. All of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
347686 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 1886 | A |
2804500 | Giacoletto | Aug 1957 | A |
3698277 | Barra | Oct 1972 | A |
3969972 | Bryant | Jul 1976 | A |
4128846 | Robinson, Jr. | Dec 1978 | A |
4172406 | Martinez | Oct 1979 | A |
4257062 | Meredith | Mar 1981 | A |
4378466 | Esser | Mar 1983 | A |
4526168 | Hassler et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4887507 | Shaw | Dec 1989 | A |
4907573 | Nagasaki | Mar 1990 | A |
5048390 | Adachi et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5207214 | Romano | May 1993 | A |
5370539 | Dillard | Dec 1994 | A |
5415071 | Davies | May 1995 | A |
5563358 | Zimmerman | Oct 1996 | A |
5741990 | Davies | Apr 1998 | A |
5784096 | Paist | Jul 1998 | A |
6031172 | Papadopoulos | Feb 2000 | A |
6111755 | Park | Aug 2000 | A |
6127616 | Yu | Oct 2000 | A |
6137041 | Nakano | Oct 2000 | A |
6201769 | Lewis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6245981 | Smith | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265651 | Landtroop | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6350942 | Thomson | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6390923 | Yoshitomi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392131 | Boyer | May 2002 | B2 |
6407323 | Karapetian | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411289 | Zimmerman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414230 | Randall | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6448487 | Smith | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6544123 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6686529 | Kim | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6750386 | King | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6791568 | Steinberg et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6841724 | George | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856329 | Peevers et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6927331 | Haase | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930235 | Sandborn et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6987220 | Holcome | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7030307 | Wedel | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7096154 | Andrade-Cetto | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7153139 | Wen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7182601 | Donnan | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202406 | Coleman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212213 | Steinberg et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7271328 | Pangrie | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7271329 | Franzblau | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7400361 | Noske et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7439438 | Hao | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7521619 | Salter | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7538265 | Lemons | May 2009 | B2 |
7663043 | Park | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667125 | Taub et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7714222 | Taub et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20020050206 | MacCutcheon | May 2002 | A1 |
20020176591 | Sandborn et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030205124 | Foote et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040089132 | Georges et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040148575 | Haase | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040206225 | Wedel | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050190199 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050241465 | Goto | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060107819 | Salter | May 2006 | A1 |
20060132714 | Nease et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070044639 | Farbood et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070157795 | Hung | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180979 | Rosenberg | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080022842 | Lemons | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034947 | Sumita | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080115656 | Sumita | May 2008 | A1 |
20080190271 | Taub et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080245212 | Lemons | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264239 | Lemons et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271589 | Lemons | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080271590 | Lemons | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080271591 | Lemons | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080276790 | Lemons | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080276791 | Lemons | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080276793 | Yamashita et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080314228 | Dreyfuss et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090223348 | Lemons | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100154619 | Taub et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0349686 | Jan 1990 | EP |
456 860 | Nov 1991 | EP |
1354561 | Oct 2003 | EP |
05-232856 | Sep 1993 | JP |
2004-226556 | Aug 2004 | JP |
10-2006-0110988 | Oct 2006 | KR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080264240 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60912978 | Apr 2007 | US |