The present invention relates generally to computers and their associated displays and more particularly to multiple displays associated with a computer.
Computers are known to include a central processing unit, system memory, video graphics circuitry, audio processing circuitry, and peripheral ports. The peripheral ports provide connectivity between the computer and peripheral devices, such as printers, displays, tape drives, and other external memory devices. As is known, displays provide computer users with a visual representation of computer applications (e.g., word processing, drawing, games, TV tuner, etc.) that are being executed by the computer. As the computer executes the computer applications, the central processing unit provides processed data to the video graphics circuitry.
The video graphics circuitry receives the processed data, converts it into display ready data, and provides the display ready data to the display at the appropriate time and rate. For example, if the computer is processing a word processing application and the display is a CRT display having a refresh rate of sixty, the video graphics circuitry converts the processed data into RGB (Red, Green, Blue) pixel data, which may be 8, 16, or 32 bits/pixel, and stores it in a frame buffer, or screen memory. The video graphics circuitry retrieves the stored RGB pixel data from the frame buffer and provides it to the CRT display at the refresh rate.
In the above-described example, the video graphics circuitry is coupled to one display device, which is typical in most computer applications. As such, the video graphics circuitry is dedicated to a single display device. Many computers, however, include an additional monitor port such that two displays may be driven from a single video graphics card. While this allows two displays to be driven from a single video graphics card, both displays will display the same image. In addition, both displays must have the same refresh rate and resolution (e.g., 640 by 480 pixel screen size). If a computer user desires that the two displays display different images, the computer needs to include two video graphics cards
While the two separate video graphics cards allow for two displays to display different images, the video graphics cards are essentially dedicated to their respective displays. In other words, each video graphics card is hard wired to a display port, which couples to one of the two displays. Thus, to change which video graphics card is driving which display, the physical connection or motherboard location of the video graphics card would need to be changed. If the displays are substantially the same, dedicated coupling to one video graphics card or the other does not affect the quality of the images being displayed. If, however, the displays are not the same (e.g., one is an LCD display and the other is a CRT monitor), image quality may vary. Thus, it would be desirable to provide images requiring a higher quality to the display capable of providing the desired quality and to provide images requiring less quality to the display having a lower quality. If the computer user knows which images require higher quality, the user can insure that the images will be processed by the appropriate video graphics card and thus displayed on the desired display. If not, the images may be displayed on the display having the lower quality.
Therefore, a need exists for a method and apparatus that provides for multiple displays to be coupled to a computer without requiring the computer to include a dedicated video graphics card for each display and provides programmable controller.
Generally, the present invention provides a method and apparatus for configuring multiple displays associated with a computing system. The configuring begins when display preferences regarding at least one of the multiple displays are received. The display preferences indicate desired selections of which images are to be displayed on which displays and may be based on user selections or application selections. Having received the display preferences, a coupling controller within a video graphics processing circuit determines whether the display preferences can be fulfilled in observance of configuration properties. The configuration properties include limitations of the displays (e.g., refresh rate, resolution) and the computing system (e.g., display controller capabilities) and/or rules of the computing system (e.g., at least one screen must be actively coupled at all times). If the display preferences can be fulfilled, the coupling controller causes display controllers to be operably coupled to displays. If, however, the display preferences cannot be fulfilled, the coupling controller determines whether the current configuration can be reconfigured to allow the display preferences to be fulfilled with minimal affect on the perceived current configuration. If so, the coupling controller causes the video graphics processing circuitry to be reconfigured. With such a method and apparatus, a single video graphics card can be used to drive multiple displays. In addition, the present invention provides a dynamic coupling of displays to display controllers such that image quality can be optimized, user preferences can be accommodated, and application preferences can be accommodated.
The present invention can be more fully described with reference to
The video graphics processing circuit 12 includes a coupling controller 26, a coupling module 28, memory 30, and a plurality of display controllers 32-36. The coupling controller 26 may be a software module that receives display preferences 40 from the user interface 16 and/or the CPU 14. The display preferences 40 include preferences as to how the user and/or a specific application running on the CPU 14 would like images from various sources to be displayed on which display 32-36. The display preferences 40 include: (i) displaying an image (i.e., the same image) on more than one of the multiple displays; (ii) displaying separate images on each of the multiple displays (e.g., a video image from a television tuner on one display and an application running on the CPU 14 on another display); (iii) displaying a portion of the image on one of the multiple displays and displaying the image on another one of the multiple displays (e.g., having one display supporting a full screen of a drawing applications and the other display supporting the toolbars); (iv) providing different refresh rates for at least two of the multiple displays; (v) providing different resolutions for at least two of the multiple displays; (vi) selecting a particular one of the multiple displays to display a particular type of image (e.g., have the television display images from the video source 15, having the CRT display supporting applications requiring high resolution, and an LCD display supporting applications requiring less resolution); and (vii) displaying a first portion of the image on a first one of the multiple displays and displaying a second portion of the image on a second one of the multiple displays (e.g., page one of a document on one display and page two of the document on another display).
Upon receiving the display preferences 40, the coupling controller 26 determines whether the display preferences 40 can be fulfilled in observance of configuration properties 48. The configuration properties 48 include properties of the multiple displays and properties of the computing system 10. The configuration properties 48 of a display include limitations of the display such as refresh rate, resolution, type of display (e.g., television, CRT display, LCD display), etc. The configuration properties 48 of the computing system relate to the capabilities of the display controllers 32-36. For example, the configuration properties include one display controller supports a television, another display controller supports a dual scan LCD display, yet another display controller supports lower refresh rate and/or resolution CRT displays, and still another display controller supports high resolution and/or high refresh rate displays. The operational rules of the computing system include rules established by the computing system manufacturer that insure a certain level of performance. For example, the rules may include a stipulation that at least one display needs to be active at any given time and/or a stipulation that a certain one of the display controllers cannot be coupled to a particular display.
If the display preferences cannot be fulfilled, the coupling controller 26 determines whether the current configuration can be reconfigured to fulfill the display preferences and to maintain the effective current configuration. For example, if display 18 is a high resolution display and is currently coupled to display controller 32 and the display preferences desires to have display controller 32 support display 20, the coupling controller 26 will determine whether one of the other display controllers is capable of supporting display 18. If so, the coupling controller 26 reconfigures the computing system, in particular, the video graphics processing circuit 12 such that display controller 32 is supporting display 20 and one of the other display controllers 34 or 36 is supporting display 18. To the computer user, the reconfiguration is made with minimal, or no, adverse visual affects to the images being displayed. If, however, the display preferences cannot be fulfilled, the coupling controller 26 provides an error, or denial, message.
As another example, assume that the same image is to be displayed on different displays 18 and 20, but are to be under separate control such that they may be presented in a different manner (e.g., at a different resolution, one display is displaying a portion of the image while the other screen is displaying the whole image, or one display is displaying a first portion of an image and the other is displaying a second portion of the image). In this example, two of the “switches” associated with the output of the screen memory 38 are closed, coupling the input of display controllers 32 and 34 to the screen memory 38. The top “switch” associated with the output of display controller 32 is closed to couple display controller 32 to display 18. Also, the top “switch” associated with the output of display controller 34 is closed coupling display controller 34 to display 20. As one of average skill in the art will appreciate, the display controllers 32-36, the screen memory 38, and the displays 18-22 may be coupled in any of a plurality of configurations.
The video graphics processing circuit 12 has thus far been primarily discussed in terms of its function. The physical implementation of the video graphics processing circuit 12 is equally as flexible. For example, the display controllers 32-36 may be included in a single adapter, or graphics chip, or each display controller 32-36 may be included on a separate graphics chip. Regardless of how the display controllers 32-36 are packaged, they are included on a single video graphics card. In general, the display controllers 32-36 retrieve display data from the screen memory 38 and provide it to the appropriate display 18-22. The display controllers 32-36 are similar to those used in the All-In-Wonder video product manufactured and distributed by ATI Technologies, Inc.
The memory 30 may be random access memory, cache memory, floppy disk memory, hard disk memory, DVD memory, magnetic tape memory, and/or any other means for storing digital information. In addition, the memory 30 may be memory on the video graphics processing circuit 12, system memory of the computing system, and/or any memory that can be coupled to the computing system and accessed by the video graphics processing circuit 12. The screen memory 38, as previously mentioned, stores display data. The type of display data varies depending on the capabilities of the displays 18-22. For example, the display data for a CRT display is RGB pixel data that may be 8, 16, or 32 bits/pixel. The display data for a television is YUV or Y, Cr, Cb data. The display data for an LCD display is 3 bit/pixel RGB pixel data that is stored in a dual scan mode.
The coupling module 28 is shown to include a plurality of “switches”. If the coupling module 28 is implemented in hardware, the “switches” will be physical switches, or the like, to provide the connectivity between the screen memory 38, the display controllers 32-36, and the displays 18-22. If, however, the coupling module 28 is implemented in software, the “switches” are implemented as registers that indicate the connectivity between the screen memory 38, the display controllers 32-36, and the displays 18-22. As one of average skill in the art will appreciate, the coupling module 28 may be further implemented as a combination of software and hardware.
The display drivers 50-54 and the graphics engine 56 function in a similar manner to similar devices in the All-In-Wonder video graphics product manufactured and distributed by ATI Technologies, Inc. In general, the display drivers 50-54 write the display data into coupled screen memories 38, 42, 44 in association with the graphics engine 56.
As shown, the coupling module 28 includes a plurality of “switches” that provides numerous configuration possibilities. The output of each element (i.e., the display controllers, the screen memories, and the display drivers) is coupled to three “switches”. This allows the output of an element to supply data to one, two, or all three of the receiving elements (i.e., the displays, the display controllers, and the screen memories). For example, the display drivers 50-54 may be configured such that one display driver writes the display data to all three of the screen memories, that one display driver writes to two screen memories and another writes to the third screen memory, that each of the display drivers writes to a separate screen memory, or that a display driver writes to only one or two of the screen memories (i.e., not all of the screen memories are used). The options for coupling the display controllers 32-36 to the displays 18-22 and coupling the screen memories 38, 42, 44 to the display controllers 32-36 are equally as numerous. As one of average skill in the art will appreciate, the number of display drivers, display controllers, and screen memories can vary from the three shown, which was selected for illustration purposes only, and that the number of display controllers, display drivers, and screen memories do not have to match.
The memory 64 stores programming instructions that, when executed by the processing unit 62, cause the processing unit 62 to function as a plurality of circuits 66-70. While executing the programming instructions, the processing unit functions as circuit 66 that receives display preferences regarding at least one display. The processing unit 62 then functions as circuit 68 that determines whether the display preferences can be fulfilled in observance of configuration properties. If so, the processing unit 62 functions as circuit 70 that configures the computing system and the at least one display in accordance with the display preferences. The programming instructions stored in memory 64, which may be a separate memory device, and the execution thereof by the processing unit 62 will be discussed in greater detail with reference to
The process then proceeds to step 84 where the answer to step 82 is obtained. If the display preferences can be fulfilled, the process proceeds to step 86 where the computing system and the display(s) is configured in accordance with the display preferences. The configuration may be done in any number of ways. For example, the configuring of the computing system and the display(s) includes operably coupling a display controller of the computing system to the display(s); includes operably coupling the display controller to at least one of the screen memories; includes operably coupling the display controller to at least one of a plurality of display drivers; includes operably coupling a first display controller of the computing system to a first display and operably coupling a second display controller of the computing system to a second display; and/or operably coupling the first display controller to a third display.
If, however, the display preferences cannot be fulfilled, the process proceeds to step 88 where a determination is made as to whether the current configuration can be reconfigured such that the display preferences can be fulfilled while maintaining effective configuration of the current configuration. The process then proceeds to step 90 where the answer to step 88 is obtained. If the current configuration can be reconfigured, the process proceeds to step 92 where the computing system and the display(s) are reconfigured. If, however, the current configuration is not reconfigurable, the process proceeds to step 91 where a denial message is provided.
After the computing system and the displays have been configured or reconfigured, the process proceeds to step 94 where a determination is made as to whether two display controllers are coupled to the same screen memory. If so, the process proceeds to step 96 where the flipping of the screen memory waits until both of the display controllers have finished reading the current frame. The process proceeds to step 98 where a determination is made as to whether new display preferences have been received. If so, the process repeats beginning at step 82. If not, the process processes the present configuration until new display preferences are received.
The preceding discussion has presented a method and apparatus for configuring multiple displays associated with a computing system. With the present invention, the multiple displays may be dynamically configured to display the same images, different images, portions of the same image, the same images with different display properties, and/or a combination thereof. The present invention provides this dynamic configurability from a single video graphics card that includes one or more graphics chips, where each graphics chip includes one or more display controllers. It should be understood that the implementation of other variations and modifications of the invention in its various aspects will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, and that the invention is not limited by the specific embodiments described. Further, any such modifications, variations, or equivalents fall within the spirit and scope of the basic underlying principles disclosed and claimed herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/032,863 filed on Mar. 2, 1998 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,554,510, having as an inventor Gordon Grigor and owned by instant assignee.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4870406 | Gupta et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4924410 | Hamada | May 1990 | A |
4980678 | Zenda | Dec 1990 | A |
4990902 | Zenda | Feb 1991 | A |
4990904 | Zenda | Feb 1991 | A |
5018076 | Johary et al. | May 1991 | A |
5083121 | Nomura et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5107251 | Frank et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5140687 | Dye et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5179651 | Taaffe et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5218274 | Zenda | Jun 1993 | A |
5218699 | Brandle et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5247676 | Ozur et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5283856 | Gross et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5285192 | Johary et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5293485 | Zenda | Mar 1994 | A |
5321423 | Yoshizawa et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5361078 | Caine | Nov 1994 | A |
5388200 | McDonald et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5420980 | Pinedo et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430457 | Zenda | Jul 1995 | A |
5432900 | Rhodes et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5459825 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5508714 | Zenda | Apr 1996 | A |
5559525 | Zenda | Sep 1996 | A |
5564009 | Pinedo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574836 | Broemmelsiek | Nov 1996 | A |
5581766 | Spurlock | Dec 1996 | A |
5592187 | Zenda | Jan 1997 | A |
5629715 | Zenda | May 1997 | A |
5682529 | Hendry et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694141 | Chee | Dec 1997 | A |
5696947 | Johns | Dec 1997 | A |
5745762 | Celi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5764201 | Ranganathan | Jun 1998 | A |
5764228 | Baldwin | Jun 1998 | A |
5784035 | Hagiwara et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801720 | Norrod et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5835090 | Clark et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838334 | Dye | Nov 1998 | A |
5841418 | Bril et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841435 | Dauerer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5870108 | Chen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874928 | Kou | Feb 1999 | A |
5923307 | Hogle, IV | Jul 1999 | A |
5929868 | Howard et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949437 | Clark | Sep 1999 | A |
5963192 | Wong et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982384 | Prouty et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990912 | Swanson | Nov 1999 | A |
6018340 | Butler et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6046753 | Searby et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049316 | Nolan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061064 | Reichlen | May 2000 | A |
6091432 | Diehl et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097401 | Owen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104359 | Endres et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104414 | Odryna et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6154225 | Kou et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6239810 | Van Hook et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240468 | Capelli | May 2001 | B1 |
6297817 | Larson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6351261 | Reichlen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6411302 | Chiraz | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6510470 | Capelli | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6573913 | Butler et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597364 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6667745 | Hussain | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6823525 | Martyn | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6853381 | Grigor et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
20050050554 | Martyn | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
N. Thompson, “Ride the WinG for Speedy Graphics,” MSDN, Sep. 1994, 4 pp. |
S. Diehl, “Window 95 Graphics Architecture,” Byte Magazine, Jun. 1995, 4 pp. |
Civaniar et al., “Image Processing Performance Evaluation for DSP Based Parallel Computers with Distributed Frame Buffers,” 1990 IEEE, pp. 993-996. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090322765 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09032863 | Mar 1998 | US |
Child | 12486319 | US |