Patent Grant
8418531
This patent is generally directed to an apparatus and method for interstitial monitoring, and more particularly to a system for continuously monitoring the pressure and vacuum levels within the interstitial space of an underground storage tank system.
Current and proposed state and federal regulations require that underground storage tanks used for the storage of hazardous substances meet certain environmental safety requirements. In particular, these environmental regulations require that the underground storage systems include a primary containment unit and a secondary containment unit. Moreover, the primary and secondary containment units are required to comply with the environmental standards that require underground storage tank systems to be product tight. The term “product tight,” for purposes of these environmental regulations, is generally defined as impervious to the substance that is contained to prevent seepage of the substance from the primary containment unit. Moreover, for a tank to be product tight, the tank cannot be subject to physical or chemical deterioration by the contained substance over the useful life of the tank. Further, these regulations require that owners or operators of an underground storage tank system with a single-walled component located within 1,000 feet of a public drinking water well implement a program of enhanced leak detection or monitoring.
One known method of monitoring leaks disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,489,894, entitled “Leak Detection Device for Double Wall Pipeline Systems and Container Systems,” uses a leak detector with a vacuum pump including a pressure-dependent switch and an alarm device to detect leaks in a double-walled pipeline or container system. The disclosed leak detector is adapted to simultaneously monitor several containers connected to a collecting main and a vacuum pump by vacuum lines. Each monitored container incorporates a vacuum connector or valve to fluidly connect a control space to the leak detector. Each vacuum line has a first liquid lock arranged at the vacuum connector to block liquid that has leaked into the vacuum lines from a leaky container from penetrating into the control spaces of the leak-free containers. A second liquid lock is arranged in the collecting main to prevent liquid from entering the vacuum pump. While this method can detect leaks within the control space of a container, it is a mechanically complex system requiring a great deal of materials and set-up time.
Other methods of monitoring secondary or interstitial spaces are well known in the art and include continuous leak detection using both pressure and brine solution monitoring techniques to determine the presence or absence of leaks between the storage system and the surrounding environment. However, to effectively calibrate all of these known methods and systems for operation, a great deal of set-up time and system knowledge is required. Specifically, to configure these monitoring systems for operation, the user must enter the volume of the secondary or interstitial space to be monitored, which requires a detailed knowledge of the layout and the configuration of the double walled piping and containers used in the underground storage system.
An underground storage system includes a primary containment unit and a secondary containment unit arranged to sealingly encompass the primary containment unit. The underground storage system further includes a leak detection system that is fluidly connected to the secondary containment system, and which is adapted to detect fluid leaks in the primary containment system and the secondary containment system.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosed device, reference should be made to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings wherein:
A submersible turbine pump (STP) 22, such as, for example, the STP model number STP-75-VL2-7 manufactured by FE PETRO, INC. (now Franklin Fueling Systems, Inc.), provides a means of pumping the liquid 20 to a dispenser 24. The STP 22 may fixedly or removably mount to the UST 12 to position an input nozzle 22a below the surface of the liquid 20. The input nozzle 22a, in turn, provides a fluid path for pumping the liquid 20 within the primary containment unit to the dispenser 24.
A pump manifold 26, which can be an integral component of the STP 22 or a separate component fixedly attached thereto, controls the distribution of the pumped liquid 20 to the dispenser 24. The pump manifold 26 includes a siphon port 28 adapted to fluidly connect the interstitial space 18 (e.g., secondary containment unit) to the vacuum generated by the STP 22. Thus, when the STP 22 is active (e.g., producing a vacuum) the siphon port 28 provides a vacuum path to the interstitial space 18 to evacuate the fluid contained therein. A control valve 30 can isolate the interstitial space 18 from the siphon port 28 to prevent a vacuum drop when the STP 22 is inactive and exposed to atmospheric pressure via the primary containment unit.
A vacuum sensor 32 fluidly communicates with the interstitial space 18 and the siphon port 28 to sample and measure the vacuum levels therein. The vacuum sensor 32 may be a continuous analog sensor, a discrete digital sensor, a switch based sensor, or any other device configured to sample the vacuum level within the interstitial space 18. The vacuum sensor 32 may be isolated by the control valve 30 to prevent atmospheric pressure measurements (i.e., zero vacuum measurements) when the STP 22 is inactive. However, when the STP 22 is active and generating a vacuum, the control valve 30 opens to provide a fluid connection between the vacuum sensor 32, the interstitial space 18 and the siphon port 28. In this manner, the vacuum sensor 32 samples and measures the change in the vacuum level within the interstitial space 18 generated by the STP 22.
Further, the vacuum sensor 32 can communicatively connect to a control unit 34 having a processor 36 and a memory 38. The control unit 34 and the memory 38 receive and store vacuum data, system information, alarm data, etc., from the vacuum sensor 32 or any other controlled component. Communications between the control unit 34 and, for example, the vacuum sensor 32 and the control valve 30, may be implemented using any desired communications link, such as a hardwired local area network, a wireless communications link, a direct communications link, or a point-to-point wired communication link.
The processor 36 may execute a control routine to direct the set-up and operation of the underground storage system 10. In particular, the control routine may be written in any process control programming language or computer language such as C++, Visual C++, Visual Basic, machine language and may be compiled (if necessary) and stored in the memory 38. Generally, the control routine insures the integrity of the underground storage system 10 by detecting unwanted leaks. In particular, the control routine may execute on the processor 36 to automatically learn the vacuum characteristics of the interstitial space 18. Further, the control routine may include additional subroutines adapted to execute on the processor 36 to continuously monitor the vacuum level within the interstitial space 18 as a function of time.
A leak orifice valve 40 fluidly connects to the control valve 30, the vacuum sensor 32, and a leak orifice 42, to provide a vacuum path between the interstitial space 18. The leak orifice valve 40 and the leak orifice 42 can define a removable assembly adapted to disconnect from the interstitial space 18 when no longer required for the set-up and operation of the underground storage system 10. The leak orifice valve 40 allows for the automatic or manual creation of a calibrated or controlled leak between the interstitial space 18 and atmospheric pressure beyond the leak orifice 42. Such a controlled leak results in a decrease in the vacuum level within the interstitial space.
The vacuum sensor 32 can, in turn, measure the decreasing vacuum level and communicate the vacuum level data to the control routine executing within the control unit 34 via the communications link. The control routine can, in turn, manipulate the vacuum level data to establish one or more vacuum characteristics of the interstitial space 18. In particular, the control routine may determine a negative vacuum level rate of change based on the decreasing vacuum level data caused by the introduction of the controlled leak into the secondary containment unit. It will be understood that other vacuum characteristics, such as, for example, a positive vacuum level rate of change, or the time to total interstitial space evacuation can be additionally or alternatively established based on the vacuum level data.
The UST 12 can connect to other components of the underground storage system 10. In particular, the interstitial space 18 can fluidly connect to a secondary interstitial space 48 of a dispenser pipe 46 via a plurality of vacuum ports 44-44b. In operation, the double-walled dispenser pipe 46 can provide the fluid connection between the liquid 20 stored within UST 12 and the dispenser 24. Thus, the entire underground storage system 10, including the UST 12 and the dispenser pipe 46, is double-walled and product tight against penetrations and corrosion that may be experienced during normal operations.
The auto-learn routine 50 can execute whenever a predetermined criteria has been satisfied. In particular, the auto-learn routine 50 can execute manually as part of a regularly scheduled maintenance procedure, or automatically in response to a change in the configuration of the underground storage system 10, as part of the initial set-up and configuration of the underground storage system 10, or to compensate for a change in vacuum level over time.
A block 52 loads the stored initial settings and default conditions required to execute the auto-learn routine 50 from the memory 38 (see
While the maximum desired vacuum level can be set to virtually any value, empirical testing indicates that a vacuum level of approximately 10 in. Hg (254 mm Hg), which represents an achievable vacuum level that is easily distinguishable from atmospheric pressure, may be desirable. Similarly, the minimum acceptable vacuum level may be set to, for example, 2 in. Hg (50.8 mm Hg). Typically, the minimum vacuum level Pmin provides a lower boundary or threshold to identify when the current vacuum level Pmeas within the interstitial space 18 is decreasing towards atmospheric pressure (i.e., approx 0 in. Hg or zero vacuum).
A block 54 causes the vacuum sensor 32 to sample and measure the current vacuum level Pmeas within the interstitial space 18. Typically, the vacuum sensor 32 samples the current vacuum level Pmeas at regular time intervals Δt throughout the operation of the auto-learn routine 50. The memory 38 can store the vacuum level data representing the current vacuum level Pmax in a historical database as a stored vacuum level Pstored. The stored vacuum level Pstored can be permanently archived in the historical database (i.e., saved in the database) or can be temporarily stored for use in calculations, analysis, etc. and subsequently erased or overwritten as new data is sampled and stored.
A block 56 compares the current vacuum level Pmeas to atmospheric pressure (i.e., zero vacuum) to establish a vacuum baseline prior to the execution of the remaining steps within the auto-learn routine 50. Upon detection of a vacuum in the interstitial space 18, a block 58 causes the control valve 30 and the leak orifice valve 40 to open and vent the detected vacuum to the atmosphere. A block 60 causes the vacuum sensor 32 to sample the current vacuum level Pmeas until atmospheric pressure is detected. When the vacuum sensor 32 detects atmospheric pressure, a block 62 closes the control valve 30 and the leak orifice valve 40 to seal and isolate the interstitial space 18 in preparation for the execution of an evacuation procedure portion of the auto-learn routine 50.
A block 64 initiates the evacuation procedure and the auto-learn routine 50 begins to learn the vacuum level data required for generation of an “up curve” (an example of which is shown in
A block 68 causes the vacuum sensor 32 to sample and measure the current vacuum level Pmeas within the interstitial space 18 at the time interval Δt. A block 70 causes the processor 36 to set the stored vacuum level Pstored equal to the current vacuum level Pmeas, and store the resulting stored vacuum level Pstored in the historical database established within the memory 38. At this point, the evacuation or up curve vacuum level rate of change within interstitial space 18 can be calculated based on the difference between the current vacuum level and the stored vacuum level over a fixed or known time interval. An evacuation rate of change ΔPevac can be mathematically described by the formula:
The evacuation rate of change ΔPevac describes the positive or increasing slope of the evacuation curve representative of an increase in the vacuum level within the interstitial space 18. Alternatively, by plotting the current vacuum level Pmeas values, and the stored vacuum level Pstored sampled during the operation of the auto-learn subroutine 50 as functions of time the evacuation curve can be constructed.
A block 72 compares the current vacuum level Pmeas to a maximum desired vacuum level Pmax. If the current vacuum level is less than the maximum desired vacuum level, the auto-learn routine 50 enters a loop 74 and continues to sample and store the current vacuum level Pmeas until the maximum desired vacuum level is achieved. However, when the block 72 detects that the current vacuum level exceeds the maximum desired vacuum level, a block 76 closes the control valve 30.
Subsequently, a block 78 deactivates the STP 22 and the evacuation procedure concludes. At this point, the interstitial space 18 is sealed and isolated by the control valve 30, and the current vacuum level Pmeas remains substantially constant at the maximum desired vacuum level Pmax.
A block 80 causes the vacuum sensor 32 to sample and measure the current vacuum level Pmeas within the sealed interstitial space 18 at each time interval Δt. The current vacuum level Pmeas is expected to remain at the maximum desired vacuum Pmax level for a fixed number of time intervals. Further, the memory 38 may store the current vacuum level Pmeas, which equals the maximum desired vacuum Pmax, in the memory 38 as the stored vacuum level Pstored. At this point, the vacuum level rate of change within interstitial space 18 is substantially zero. In other words, the vacuum level within the sealed interstitial space is constant. A positive or negative change in the vacuum level during this time interval represents an anomaly, such as a leak, that will trigger an alarm. A maximum vacuum rate of change ΔPmax can be mathematically described by the formula:
The maximum vacuum rate of vacuum rate of change ΔPmax represents the zero-slope line corresponding to the maximum desired vacuum level Pmax. It will be understood that determination of the maximum vacuum rate of change ΔPmax is an optional calculation that may be carried out by the control unit 34.
A block 82 initiates the decay procedure and the auto-learn routine 50 begins to learn the vacuum level data required to generate the “down” or “decay curve” (an example of which is shown in
A block 84 causes the vacuum sensor 32 to sample and measure the decreasing current vacuum level Pmeas within the interstitial space 18 at each of the time intervals Δt. A block 86 instructs the processor 36 to store the decreasing current vacuum level Pmeas in the memory 38 as the stored vacuum level Pstored. At this point, the decay or down curve vacuum level rate of change within interstitial space 18 can be calculated based on the difference between the stored vacuum level Pstored and the current vacuum level Pmeas over a fixed time interval Δt. A decay rate of change ΔPdecay can be mathematically described by the formula:
The decay rate of change ΔPdecay represents the negative slope of the decay curve, which is the line defined by the decreasing current vacuum level Pmeas values measured by the vacuum sensor 32 during the decay procedure of the auto-learn routine 50.
A block 88 compares the current vacuum level Pmeas to a minimum desired vacuum level Pmin. It will be understood that the minimum desired vacuum level Pmin could be set to zero vacuum (i.e. atmospheric pressure) but will typically be set higher to reduce the overall setup time for the system. In other words, the closer to atmospheric pressure that the minimum desired vacuum level Pmin is set, the longer the interstitial space 18 takes to equalize. If the current vacuum level Pmeas is greater than the minimum desired vacuum level Pmin, the auto-learn routine 50 enters a loop 90 and continues to sample and store the current vacuum level Pmeas until the vacuum sensor 32 detects the minimum desired vacuum level Pmin within the interstitial space 18. However, if, at the block 88, the current vacuum level Pmeas is less than the minimum desired vacuum level Pmin, a block 92 cause the control valve 30 to close. At this point, the decay procedure of the auto-learn routine 50 concludes and the learned rates of change ΔPevac and ΔPdecay can be combined to produce the overall vacuum characteristics curve shown in
An upper range defined by the line 102a and a lower range defined by the line 102b establish the allowable amount of vacuum level variation from the learned line 102 during the evacuation procedure. An alarm subroutine can activate when the current vacuum level Pmeas deviates beyond the acceptable limits established by the upper and lower ranges defined by the lines 102a and 102b. For example, the alarm subroutine may determine a leak exists within the interstitial space 18 when the current vacuum level is determined to be outside of the upper and lower ranges defined by the lines 102a and 102b, or the maximum desired vacuum Pmax is not achieved by the time Tmax.
A line 104 represents the maximum desired vacuum level Pmax and the learned maximum vacuum rate of change ΔPmax equal to zero (i.e., the vacuum is constant). In physical terms, the line 104 represents the constant current vacuum level measured when within the interstitial space 18 is sealed and isolated from the STP 22, and the leak orifice valve 40. The isolated interstitial space 18 insures that the current vacuum level Pmeas remains virtually constant at Pmax over the fixed number of time intervals.
As described previously, the line 106 represents the learned decay rate of change ΔPdecay derived during the auto-learn routine 50. The line 106 illustrates a decrease in the measured vacuum level within the interstitial space 18 as a function of time. In particular, the line 106 corresponds to a system configuration wherein a controlled leak has been introduced into the underground storage system 10, and the current vacuum level Pmeas decreases as the vacuum within the interstitial space 18 equalizes with atmospheric pressure (i.e., a vacuum level of zero.)
As illustrated in
A block 128 causes the control valve 30 to open, thereby establishing fluid communication between the STP 22, the interstitial space 18, and the vacuum sensor 32. Typically, the control valve 30 opens after a delay period equal to the amount of time required for vacuum sensor 32 to detect the vacuum generated by the STP 22. A block 130 instructs the vacuum sensor 32 to sample and measure the increasing current vacuum level Pmeas within the interstitial space 18 at each of the time intervals Δt.
A block 132 compares a current vacuum level rate of change Pcurrent to the learned evacuation rate of change ΔPevac determined during the auto-learn routine 50. It will be understood that the current vacuum level rate of change ΔPcurrent can be determined based on the difference between the current vacuum level Pmeas and the stored vacuum levels Pstored as a function of time. A current vacuum level rate of change ΔPcurrent can be described by the formula:
If the current vacuum level rate of change ΔPcurrent is learned determined to be less than the learned evacuation rate of change ΔPevac, a block 134 may activate the alarm routine. However, if the current vacuum level rate of change ΔPcurrent exceeds the learned evacuation rate of change ΔPevac, a block 136 instructs the processor 36 to store the increasing current vacuum level Pmeas in the memory 38 as the stored vacuum level Pstored.
A block 138 compares the current vacuum level Pmeas to a maximum desired vacuum level Pmax. If the current vacuum level Pmeas is less than the maximum desired vacuum level Pmax, the monitoring routine 120 enters a loop 140 and continues to sample and store the current vacuum level Pmeas until the maximum desired vacuum level Pmax is detected. However, if the current vacuum level Pmeas exceeds the maximum desired vacuum level Pmax, a block 142 causes the control valve 30 to close.
A block 144 deactivates the STP 22 upon completion of the evacuation of the now-sealed interstitial space 18. Thus, the monitoring routine 120 has recharged the vacuum level within the interstitial space 18. In operation, the evacuation or increase in the vacuum level of the interstitial space 18 proceeds along the learned evacuation vacuum curve 102, and the monitoring routine 120 continually verifies that the current vacuum level Pmeas remains within the predefined range defined by the lines 102a and 102b. Simultaneously, the time required to recharge the interstitial space 18 to the maximum desired vacuum level Pmax can be compared to the maximum time Tmax. If the current recharge time exceeds the maximum time Tmax, a leak or other anomaly is assumed to exist and the alarm routine 134 activates.
A block 146 restarts the monitoring routine 120 so that the vacuum sensor 32 samples and measures the current vacuum level Pmeas at the block 122. At the block 124, the recently recharged current vacuum level Pmeas is compared to the minimum allowable vacuum level Pmin (e.g., 2 in. Hg or zero vacuum). Because the recently recharged current vacuum level Pmeas is greater than the minimum allowable vacuum level Pmin, a block 148 compares the current vacuum level rate of change Pcurrent to the learned decay rate of change ΔPdecay determined during the auto-learn routine 50.
As previously discussed, the interstitial space 18 is sealed and the monitoring routine 120 measures the current vacuum level Pmeas to determine if the decrease in the current vacuum level Pmeas is attributable to the natural permeation properties of the underground storage system 10 or to a leak. Furthermore, the comparison between the learned vacuum curve and the current vacuum level Pmeas can be based on the difference between the decay rate of change ΔPdecay and the current rate of change ΔPcurrent or simply based on the difference between the current vacuum level Pmeas and the learned vacuum curve itself.
A block 150 instructs the processor 36 to store the current vacuum level Pmeas in the memory 38 as the stored vacuum level Pstored. At this point, the monitoring routine 120 enters a loop 152 and continues to sample and store the current vacuum level Pmeas until the minimum allowable vacuum level Pmin is detected, at which time the STP 22 activates to evacuate the interstitial space 18.
Similarly, monitoring of the vacuum level during evacuation can also be used to monitor for problems. The system uses the learned evacuation rate of change ΔPevac, or upcurve, as illustrated as line 102 (
While the embodiments described herein have been directed to vacuum level measurements and analysis, it will be understood that an overpressure within the interstitial space 18 may be employed to provide a pressure gradient suitable for measurement by the auto-learn routine 50 and monitoring by the monitoring routine 120. Further, it will be understood that the current vacuum level Pmeas and the calculated rates of change can be determined in a manual fashion. For instance, manual instructions may direct the control unit 34 to sample and store the current vacuum level Pmeas within the interstitial space 18. Moreover, an operator may employ the rate of change formulas and concepts discussed above in conjunction with the stored vacuum levels Pstored to manually calculate the desired rates of change.
Although certain embodiments have been described in accordance with the teachings of the present disclosure, the scope and coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. To the contrary; this patent is intended to cover all embodiments of the teachings of the disclosure that fairly fall within the scope of the permissible equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/505,716, filed Jul. 20, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,069,705; which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/967,760, filed Dec. 31, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,578,169; which is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 11/253,341, filed Oct. 19, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,334,456; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/842,894, filed May 11, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,051,579, the disclosures of which are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4012944 | Covington et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4144743 | Covington et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4587619 | Converse, III et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4686638 | Furuse | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4794784 | Bley | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4796676 | Hendershot et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4993256 | Fukuda | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5117677 | Hendershot et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5168748 | Flora, Jr. et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5400646 | Kraus et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5408420 | Slocum et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5461906 | Bogle et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5467641 | Williams et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5526678 | Shaw et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5657254 | Sierk et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5883301 | Filippi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5927762 | Webb | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6082182 | Fierro et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6082184 | Lehmann | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6202477 | Lehmann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6223130 | Gray et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6305215 | Lehmann | Oct 2001 | B2 |
| 6439033 | Lehmann | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6489894 | Berg | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6629450 | Lu et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6886388 | McGill et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 7051579 | Kenney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7334456 | Kenney et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7578169 | Kenney et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 20020044060 | Berg | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20030015022 | Stegmann et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20100013646 | Kenney et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 42 18 890 | Dec 1993 | DE |
| 0 536 987 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0 611 674 | Aug 1994 | EP |
| H04-22800 | Apr 1992 | JP |
| 2001-318022 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2003-337078 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2004-251251 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2007053246 | May 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances”, Statutes of Chapter 6.7, California Codes, Health and Safety Codes, California 2009 Code, pp. 1-44. |
| Search Report, corresponding European Application No. 10178966.7 dated Dec. 6, 2010. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120067109 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11253341 | Oct 2005 | US |
| Child | 11967760 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12505716 | Jul 2009 | US |
| Child | 13309319 | US | |
| Parent | 11967760 | Dec 2007 | US |
| Child | 12505716 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10842894 | May 2004 | US |
| Child | 11253341 | US |
