The invention relates to apparatus and methods for controlling fluid flow in a subterranean well having a movable flow control mechanism which actuates in response to a change of a characteristic of the fluid flow.
During the completion of a well that traverses a subterranean formation, production tubing and various equipment are installed in the well to enable safe and efficient production of the formation fluids. For example, to control the flow rate of production fluids into the production tubing, it is common practice to install one or more inflow control devices within the tubing string.
Formations often produce multiple constituents in the production fluid, namely, natural gas, oil, and water. It is often desirable to reduce or prevent the production of one constituent in favor of another. For example, in an oil producing well, it may be desired to minimize natural gas production and to maximize oil production. While various downhole tools have been utilized for fluid separation and for control of production fluids, a need has arisen for a device for controlling the inflow of formation fluids. Further, a need has arisen for such a fluid flow control device that is responsive to changes in characteristic of the fluid flow as it changes over time during the life of the well and without requiring intervention by the operator.
Apparatus and methods for controlling the flow of fluid, such as formation fluid, through an oilfield tubular positioned in a wellbore extending through a subterranean formation. Fluid flow is autonomously controlled in response to change in a fluid flow characteristic, such as density. In one embodiment, a fluid diverter is movable between an open and closed position in response to fluid density change and operable to restrict fluid flow through a valve assembly inlet. The diverter can be pivotable, rotatable or otherwise movable in response to the fluid density change. In one embodiment, the diverter is operable to control a fluid flow ratio through two valve inlets. The fluid flow ratio is used to operate a valve member to restrict fluid flow through the valve. In other embodiments, the fluid diverter moves in response to density change in the fluid to affect fluid flow patterns in a tubular, the change in flow pattern operating a valve assembly.
For a more complete understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention, reference is now made to the detailed description of the invention along with the accompanying figures in which corresponding numerals in the different figures refer to corresponding parts and in which:
It should be understood by those skilled in the art that the use of directional terms such as above, below, upper, lower, upward, downward and the like are used in relation to the illustrative embodiments as they are depicted in the figures, the upward direction being toward the top of the corresponding figure and the downward direction being toward the bottom of the corresponding figure. Where this is not the case and a term is being used to indicate a required orientation, the Specification will state or make such clear either explicitly or from context. Upstream and downstream are used to indication location or direction in relation to the surface, where upstream indicates relative position or movement towards the surface along the wellbore and downstream indicates relative position or movement further away from the surface along the wellbore.
While the making and using of various embodiments of the present invention are discussed in detail below, a practitioner of the art will appreciate that the present invention provides applicable inventive concepts which can be embodied in a variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention and do not delimit the scope of the present invention.
Positioned within wellbore 12 and extending from the surface is a tubing string 22. Tubing string 22 provides a conduit for formation fluids to travel from formation 20 upstream to the surface. Positioned within tubing string 22 in the various production intervals adjacent to formation 20 are a plurality of fluid control assemblies 25 and a plurality of production tubular sections 24. On either side of each production tubulars 24 is a packer 26 that provides a fluid seal between tubing string 22 and the wall of wellbore 12. Each pair of adjacent packers 26 defines a production interval.
In the illustrated embodiment, each of the production tubular sections 24 provides sand control capability. The sand control screen elements or filter media associated with production tubular sections 24 are designed to allow fluids to flow therethrough but prevent particulate matter of sufficient size from flowing therethrough. The exact design of the screen element associated with fluid flow control devices 24 is not critical to the present invention as long as it is suitably designed for the characteristics of the formation fluids and for any treatment operations to be performed.
The term “natural gas” as used herein means a mixture of hydrocarbons (and varying quantities of non-hydrocarbons) that exist in a gaseous phase at room temperature and pressure. The term does not indicate that the natural gas is in a gaseous phase at the downhole location of the inventive systems. Indeed, it is to be understood that the flow control system is for use in locations where the pressure and temperature are such that natural gas will be in a mostly liquefied state, though other components may be present and some components may be in a gaseous state. The inventive concept will work with liquids or gases or when both are present.
The formation fluid flowing into the production tubular 24 typically comprises more than one fluid component. Typical components are natural gas, oil, water, steam, or carbon dioxide. Steam, water, and carbon dioxide are commonly used as injection fluids to drive the hydrocarbon towards the production tubular, whereas natural gas, oil and water are typically found in situ in the formation. The proportion of these components in the formation fluid flowing into the production tubular will vary over time and based on conditions within the formation and wellbore. Likewise, the composition of the fluid flowing into the various production tubing sections throughout the length of the entire production string can vary significantly from section to section. The fluid control apparatus is designed to restrict production from an interval when it has a higher proportion of an undesired component based on the relative density of the fluid.
Accordingly, when a production interval corresponding to a particular one of the fluid control assemblies produces a greater proportion of an undesired fluid component, the fluid control apparatus in that interval will restrict production flow from that interval. Thus, the other production intervals which are producing a greater proportion of desired fluid component, for example oil, will contribute more to the production stream entering tubing string 22. Through use of the fluid control assemblies 25 of the present invention and by providing numerous production intervals, control over the volume and composition of the produced fluids is enabled. For example, in an oil production operation if an undesired component of the production fluid, such as water, steam, carbon dioxide, or natural gas, is entering one of the production intervals at greater than a target percentage, the fluid control apparatus in that interval will autonomously restrict production of formation fluid from that interval based on the density change when those components are present in greater than the targeted amount.
The fluid control apparatus actuates in response to density changes of the fluid in situ. The apparatus is designed to restrict fluid flow when the fluid reaches a target density. The density can be chosen to restrict flow of the fluid when it is reaches a target percentage of an undesirable component. For example, it may be desired to allow production of formation fluid where the fluid is composed of 80 percent oil (or more) with a corresponding composition of 20 percent (or less) of natural gas. Flow is restricted if the fluid falls below the target percentage of oil. Hence, the target density is production fluid density of a composition of 80 percent oil and 20 percent natural gas. If the fluid density becomes too low, flow is restricted by the mechanisms explained herein. Equivalently, an undesired higher density fluid could be restricted while a desired lower density fluid is produced.
Even though
Further, it is envisioned that the fluid control apparatus 25 can be used in conjunction with other downhole devices including inflow control devices (ICD) and screen assemblies. Inflow control devices and screen assemblies are not described here in detail, are known in the art, and are commercially available from Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. among others.
In addition,
The fluid control apparatus 25 effectively restricts inflow of an undesired fluid while allowing minimally restricted flow of a desired fluid. For example, the fluid control apparatus 25 can be configured to restrict flow of formation fluid when the fluid is composed of a preselected percentage of natural gas, or where the formation fluid density is lower than a target density. In such a case, the fluid control apparatus selects oil production over gas production, effectively restricting gas production.
The fluid diverter arms 102 are used to select how fluid flow is split between lower inlet 204 and upper inlet 206 of the valve assembly 200 and hence to control fluid flow through the tubular. The fluid diverter 101 is actuated by change in the density of the fluid in which it is immersed and the corresponding change in the buoyancy of the diverter 101. When the density of the diverter 101 is higher than the fluid, the diverter will “sink” to the position shown in
The fluid diverting arms operate on the difference in the density of the downhole fluid over time. For example, the buoyancy of the diverter arms is different in a fluid composed primarily of oil versus a fluid primarily composed of natural gas. Similarly, the buoyancy changes in oil versus water, water versus gas, etc. The buoyancy principles are explained more fully herein with respect to
The valve assembly 200 seen in
The exemplary valve assembly 200 includes a venturi pressure converter to enhance the driving pressure of the valve assembly. Based on Bernoulli's principle, assuming other properties of the flow remain constant, the static pressure will decrease as the flow velocity increases. A fluid flow ratio is created between the two inlets 204 and 206 by using the diverter arms 102 to restrict flow through one of the fluid inlets of the valve assembly, thereby reducing volumetric fluid flow through that inlet. The inlets 204 and 206 have venturi constrictions therein to enhance the pressure change at each pressure port 224 and 226. The venturi pressure converter allows the valve to have a small pressure differential at the inlets but a larger pressure differential can be used to open and close the valve assembly 200.
A biasing mechanism 228, such as a spring or a counterweight, can be employed to bias the valve member 212 towards one position. As shown, the leaf spring biases the member 212 towards the open position as seen in
The dual-arm and dual valve assembly design seen in the figures can be replaced with a single arm and single valve assembly design. An alternate housing 120 is seen in
Note that the embodiment as seen in
Further, the embodiment can be employed in processes other than production from a hydrocarbon well. For example, the device can be utilized during injection of fluids into a wellbore to select injection of steam over water based on the relative densities of these fluids. During the injection process, hot water and steam are often commingled and exist in varying ratios in the injection fluid. Often hot water is circulated downhole until the wellbore has reached the desired temperature and pressure conditions to provide primarily steam for injection into the formation. It is typically not desirable to inject hot water into the formation. Consequently, the flow control apparatus 25 can be utilized to select for injection of steam (or other injection fluid) over injection of hot water or other less desirable fluids. The diverter will actuate based on the relative density of the injection fluid. When the injection fluid has an undesirable proportion of water and a consequently relatively higher density, the diverter will float to the position seen in
The diverter 301 is mounted for rotational movement in response to changes in fluid density. The exemplary diverter 301 shown is semi-circular in cross-section along a majority of its length with circular cross-sectional portions at either end. The embodiment will be described for use in selecting production of a higher density fluid, such as oil, and restricting production of a relatively lower density fluid, such as natural gas. In such a case, the diverter is “weighted” by high density counterweight portions 306 made of material with relatively high density, such as steel or another metal. The portion 304, shown in an exemplary embodiment as semi-circular in cross section, is made of a material of relatively lower density material, such as plastic. The diverter portion 304 is more buoyant than the counterweight portions 306 in denser fluid, causing the diverter to rotate to the upper or open position seen in
The diverter 301 rotates about its longitudinal axis 309 to the open position as seen in
As seen in
The buoyancy of the diverter creates a torque which rotates the diverter 301 about its longitudinal rotational axis. The torque produced must overcome any frictional and inertial forces tending to hold the diverter in place. Note that physical constraints or stops can be employed to constrain rotational movement of the diverter; that is, to limit rotation to various angles of rotation within a preselected arc or range. The torque will then exceed the static frictional forces to ensure the diverter will move when desired. Further, the constraints can be placed to prevent rotation of the diverter to top or bottom center to prevent possibly getting “stuck” in such an orientation. In one embodiment, the restriction of fluid flow is directly related to the angle of rotation of the diverter within a selected range of rotation. The passageway 308 of the diverter 301 aligns with the outlet 408 of the valve assembly when the diverter is in a completely open position, as seen in
The diverter assembly 300 is in a closed position in
In the closed position, as seen in
Once properly oriented, the valve assembly 400 and fixed support 310 can be sealed into place to prevent further movement of the valve assembly and to reduce possible leak pathways. In a preferred embodiment, as seen in
The fluid control apparatus described above can be configured to select oil production over water production based on the relative densities of the two fluids. In a gas well, the fluid control apparatus can be configured to select gas production over oil or water production. The invention described herein can also be used in injection methods. The fluid control assembly is reversed in orientation such that flow of injection fluid from the surface enters the assembly prior to entering the formation. In an injection operation, the control assembly operates to restrict flow of an undesired fluid, such as water, while not providing increased resistance to flow of a desired fluid, such as steam or carbon dioxide. The fluid control apparatus described herein can also be used on other well operations, such as work-overs, cementing, reverse cementing, gravel packing, hydraulic fracturing, etc. Other uses will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
The valve assembly 700 includes a rotating valve member 702 mounted pivotally in the tubular 550 and movable between a closed position, seen in
Movement of the diverter arm 602 affects the fluid flow pattern through the tubular 550. When the diverter arm 602 is in the lower or closed position, seen in
A counterweight 601 may be used to adjust the fluid density at which the diverter arm 602 “floats” or “sinks” and can also be used to allow the material of the floater arm to have a significantly higher density than the fluid where the diverter arm “floats.” As explained above in relation to the rotating diverter system, the relative buoyancy or effective density of the diverter arm in relation to the fluid density will determine the conditions under which the diverter arm will change between open and closed or upper and lower positions.
Of course, the embodiment seen in
Similarly,
As with the other embodiments described herein, the embodiments in
In the exemplary embodiment at
Other flow path designs can be employed as taught in the incorporated reference, including multiple flow paths, multiple flow control devices, such as orifice plates, tortuous pathways, etc., can be employed. Further, the pathways can be designed to exhibit differing flow ratios in response to other fluid flow characteristics, such as flow rate, velocity, density, etc., as explained in the incorporated reference.
The valve assembly 820 has a first inlet 830 in fluid communication with the first flow path 804 and a second inlet 832 in fluid communication with the second flow path 806. A movable valve member 822 is positioned in a valve chamber 836 and moves or actuates in response to fluid flowing into the valve inlets 830 and 832. The movable valve member 822, in a preferred embodiment, rotates about pivot 825. Pivot 825 is positioned to control the pivoting of the valve member 822 and can be offset from center, as shown, to provide the desired response to flow from the inlets. Alternate movable valve members can rotate, pivot, slide, bend, flex, or otherwise move in response to fluid flow. In an example, the valve member 822 is designed to rotate about pivot 825 to an open position, seen in
The movable valve member 822 has a flow sensor 824 with first and second flow sensor arms 838 and 840, respectively. The flow sensor 824 moves in response to changes in flow pattern from fluid through inlets 830 and 832. Specifically, the first sensor arm 838 is positioned in the flow path from the first inlet 830 and the second sensor arm 840 is positioned in the flow path of the second inlet 832. Each of the sensor arms has impingement surfaces 828. In a preferred embodiment, the impingement surfaces 828 are of a stair-step design to maximize the hydraulic force as the part rotates. The valve member 822 also has a restriction arm 826 which can restrict the valve outlet 834. When the valve member is in the open position, as shown, the restriction arm allows fluid flow through the outlet with no or minimal restriction. As the valve member rotates to a closed position, the restriction arm 826 moves to restrict fluid flow through the valve outlet. The valve can restrict fluid flow through the outlet partially or completely.
The rotational rate of the rotation assembly depends on a selected characteristic of the fluid or fluid flow. For example, the rotational assembly shown is viscosity dependent, with greater resistance to rotational movement when the fluid is of a relatively high viscosity. As the viscosity of the fluid decreases, the rotational rate of the rotation assembly increases, thereby restricting flow through the valve outlet. Alternately, the rotational assembly can rotate at varying rates in response to other fluid characteristics such as velocity, flow rate, density, etc., as described herein. The rotational flow-driven assembly can be utilized to restricted flow of fluid of a pre-selected target characteristic. In such a manner, the assembly can be used to allow flow of the fluid when it is of a target composition, such as relatively high oil content, while restricting flow when the fluid changes to a relatively higher content of a less viscous component, such as natural gas. Similarly, the assembly can be designed to select oil over water, natural gas over water, or natural gas over oil in a production method. The assembly can also be used in other processes, such as cementing, injection, work-overs and other methods.
Further, alternate designs are available for the rotational flow-driven resistance assembly. The balances, balance arms, vanes, restriction member and restriction support member can all be of alternate design and can be positioned up or downstream of one another. Other design decisions will be apparent to those of skill in the art.
While this invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiments as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is, therefore, intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.
This application is a Continuation Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/770,568, filed Apr. 29, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
553727 | Van Sickle | Jan 1896 | A |
1329559 | Tesla | Feb 1920 | A |
2140735 | Clarke | Dec 1938 | A |
2324819 | Butzbach | Jun 1941 | A |
2762437 | Egan | Sep 1956 | A |
2849070 | Maly | Aug 1958 | A |
2945541 | Maly | Jul 1960 | A |
2981332 | Miller | Apr 1961 | A |
2981333 | Miller | Apr 1961 | A |
3091393 | Sparrow | May 1963 | A |
3186484 | Waterman | Jun 1965 | A |
3216439 | Manion | Nov 1965 | A |
3233621 | Manion | Feb 1966 | A |
3233622 | Boothe | Feb 1966 | A |
3256899 | Dexter | Jun 1966 | A |
3266510 | Wadey | Aug 1966 | A |
3267946 | Adams | Aug 1966 | A |
3282279 | Manion | Nov 1966 | A |
3375842 | Reader | Apr 1968 | A |
3427580 | Brock | Feb 1969 | A |
3461897 | Kwok | Aug 1969 | A |
3470894 | Rimmer | Oct 1969 | A |
3474670 | Rupert | Oct 1969 | A |
3477506 | Malone | Nov 1969 | A |
3486975 | Ripley | Dec 1969 | A |
3489009 | Rimmer | Jan 1970 | A |
3515160 | Cohen | Jun 1970 | A |
3521657 | Ayers | Jul 1970 | A |
3529614 | Nelson | Sep 1970 | A |
3537466 | Chapin | Nov 1970 | A |
3554209 | Brown | Jan 1971 | A |
3566900 | Black | Mar 1971 | A |
3575804 | Ripley | Apr 1971 | A |
3586104 | Hyde | Jun 1971 | A |
3598137 | Glaze | Aug 1971 | A |
3620238 | Kawahata | Nov 1971 | A |
3638672 | Smith | Feb 1972 | A |
3643676 | Limage | Feb 1972 | A |
3670753 | Healey | Jun 1972 | A |
3704832 | Fix | Dec 1972 | A |
3712321 | Bauer | Jan 1973 | A |
3717164 | Griffin | Jan 1973 | A |
3730673 | Straitz | May 1973 | A |
3745115 | Olsen | Jul 1973 | A |
3754576 | Zetterstrom | Aug 1973 | A |
3756285 | Johnson | Sep 1973 | A |
3776460 | Fichter | Dec 1973 | A |
3850190 | Carlson | Nov 1974 | A |
3860519 | Weatherford | Jan 1975 | A |
3876016 | Stinson | Apr 1975 | A |
3885627 | Berry | May 1975 | A |
3895901 | Swartz | Jul 1975 | A |
3927849 | Kovalenko | Dec 1975 | A |
3942557 | Tsuchiya | Mar 1976 | A |
4003405 | Hayes | Jan 1977 | A |
4029127 | Thompson | Jun 1977 | A |
4082169 | Bowles | Apr 1978 | A |
4127173 | Watkins | Nov 1978 | A |
4134100 | Funke | Jan 1979 | A |
4138669 | Edison | Feb 1979 | A |
4167073 | Tang | Sep 1979 | A |
4167873 | Bahrton | Sep 1979 | A |
4187909 | Erbstoesser | Feb 1980 | A |
4268245 | Straitz, III | May 1981 | A |
4276943 | Holmes | Jul 1981 | A |
4279304 | Harper | Jul 1981 | A |
4282097 | Kuepper | Aug 1981 | A |
4286627 | Graf | Sep 1981 | A |
4287952 | Erbstoesser | Sep 1981 | A |
4291395 | Holmes | Sep 1981 | A |
4303128 | Marr, Jr. | Dec 1981 | A |
4307204 | Vidal | Dec 1981 | A |
4307653 | Goes | Dec 1981 | A |
4323118 | Bergmann | Apr 1982 | A |
4323991 | Holmes | Apr 1982 | A |
4345650 | Wesley | Aug 1982 | A |
4364232 | Sheinbaum | Dec 1982 | A |
4364587 | Samford | Dec 1982 | A |
4385875 | Kanazawa | May 1983 | A |
4390062 | Fox | Jun 1983 | A |
4393928 | Warnock, Sr. | Jul 1983 | A |
4396062 | Iskander | Aug 1983 | A |
4418721 | Holmes | Dec 1983 | A |
4442903 | Schutt | Apr 1984 | A |
4467833 | Satterwhite | Aug 1984 | A |
4485780 | Price | Dec 1984 | A |
4491186 | Alder | Jan 1985 | A |
4495990 | Titus | Jan 1985 | A |
4518013 | Lazarus | May 1985 | A |
4526667 | Parkhurst | Jul 1985 | A |
4527636 | Bordon | Jul 1985 | A |
4557295 | Holmes | Dec 1985 | A |
4562867 | Stouffer | Jan 1986 | A |
4570675 | Fenwick | Feb 1986 | A |
4570715 | Van Meurs | Feb 1986 | A |
4618197 | White | Oct 1986 | A |
4648455 | Luke | Mar 1987 | A |
4716960 | Eastlund | Jan 1988 | A |
4747451 | Adams | May 1988 | A |
4765184 | Delatore | Aug 1988 | A |
4801310 | Bielefeldt | Jan 1989 | A |
4805407 | Buchanan | Feb 1989 | A |
4808084 | Tsubouchi | Feb 1989 | A |
4817863 | Bragg | Apr 1989 | A |
4846224 | Collins, Jr. | Jul 1989 | A |
4848991 | Bielefeldt | Jul 1989 | A |
4857197 | Young | Aug 1989 | A |
4895582 | Bielefeldt | Jan 1990 | A |
4911239 | Winckler | Mar 1990 | A |
4919201 | Bridges | Apr 1990 | A |
4919204 | Baker | Apr 1990 | A |
4921438 | Godfrey | May 1990 | A |
4945995 | Tholance | Aug 1990 | A |
4967048 | Langston | Oct 1990 | A |
4974674 | Wells | Dec 1990 | A |
4984594 | Vinegar | Jan 1991 | A |
4998585 | Newcomer | Mar 1991 | A |
RE33690 | Adams, Jr. | Sep 1991 | E |
5058683 | Godfrey | Oct 1991 | A |
5076327 | Mettner | Dec 1991 | A |
5080783 | Brown | Jan 1992 | A |
5099918 | Bridges | Mar 1992 | A |
5154835 | Demichael | Oct 1992 | A |
5165450 | Marrelli | Nov 1992 | A |
5166677 | Schoenberg | Nov 1992 | A |
5184678 | Pechkov | Feb 1993 | A |
5202194 | VanBerg | Apr 1993 | A |
5207273 | Cates | May 1993 | A |
5207274 | Streich | May 1993 | A |
5228508 | Facteau | Jul 1993 | A |
5251703 | Skinner | Oct 1993 | A |
5279363 | Schultz | Jan 1994 | A |
5282508 | Ellingsen | Feb 1994 | A |
5303782 | Johannessen | Apr 1994 | A |
5332035 | Schultz | Jul 1994 | A |
5333684 | Walter | Aug 1994 | A |
5337808 | Graham | Aug 1994 | A |
5337821 | Peterson | Aug 1994 | A |
5338496 | Talbot | Aug 1994 | A |
5341883 | Ringgenberg | Aug 1994 | A |
5343963 | Bouldin | Sep 1994 | A |
5375658 | Schultz | Dec 1994 | A |
5435393 | Brekke | Jul 1995 | A |
5455804 | Holmes | Oct 1995 | A |
5464059 | Kristiansen | Nov 1995 | A |
5482117 | Kolpak | Jan 1996 | A |
5484016 | Surjaatmadja | Jan 1996 | A |
5505262 | Cobb | Apr 1996 | A |
5516603 | Holcombe | May 1996 | A |
5533571 | Surjaatmadja | Jul 1996 | A |
5547029 | Rubbo | Aug 1996 | A |
5570744 | Weingarten | Nov 1996 | A |
5578209 | Weiss | Nov 1996 | A |
5673751 | Head | Oct 1997 | A |
5815370 | Sutton | Sep 1998 | A |
5839508 | Tubel | Nov 1998 | A |
5868201 | Bussear | Feb 1999 | A |
5893383 | Facteau | Apr 1999 | A |
5896076 | Van Namen | Apr 1999 | A |
6032733 | Ludwig | Mar 2000 | A |
6078471 | Fiske | Jun 2000 | A |
6098020 | DenBoer | Aug 2000 | A |
6109370 | Gray | Aug 2000 | A |
6109372 | Dorel et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112817 | Voll | Sep 2000 | A |
6164375 | Carisella | Dec 2000 | A |
6015011 | Hunter | Jan 2001 | A |
6176308 | Pearson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179052 | Purkis | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6247536 | Leismer | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253847 | Stephenson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6315043 | Farrant | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315049 | Hickey | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320238 | Kizilyalli | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345963 | Thomin | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6367547 | Towers | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371210 | Bode | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397950 | Streich | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426917 | Tabanou | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433991 | Deaton | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450263 | Schwendemann | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464011 | Tubel | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6470970 | Purkis | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497252 | Kohler | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6540263 | Sausner | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544691 | Guidotti | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547010 | Hensley | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567013 | Purkis | May 2003 | B1 |
6575237 | Purkis | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575248 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585051 | Purkis | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6622794 | Zisk, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627081 | Hilditch | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6644412 | Bode | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6668936 | Williamson, Jr. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672382 | Schultz | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679332 | Vinegar | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6691781 | Grant | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6705085 | Braithwaite | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6719048 | Ramos | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725925 | Al-Ramadhan | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6812811 | Robison | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834725 | Whanger | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840325 | Stephenson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851473 | Davidson | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6851560 | Reig | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857475 | Johnson | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857476 | Richards | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6886634 | Richards | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6907937 | Whanger | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913079 | Tubel | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6935432 | Nguyen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957703 | Trott | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958704 | Vinegar | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967589 | Peters | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976507 | Webb | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7007756 | Lerche | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011101 | Bowe | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011152 | Soelvik | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013979 | Richard | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017662 | Schultz | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025134 | Byrd | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7038332 | Robison | May 2006 | B2 |
7040391 | Leuthen | May 2006 | B2 |
7043937 | Lifson | May 2006 | B2 |
7059401 | Bode | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7063162 | Oaling | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066261 | Vicente | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096945 | Richards | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100686 | Wittrisch | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108083 | Simonds | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114560 | Nguyen | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143832 | Freyer | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7168494 | Starr | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185706 | Freyer | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7199480 | Fripp | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207386 | Brannon | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7213650 | Lehman | May 2007 | B2 |
7213681 | Birchak | May 2007 | B2 |
7216738 | Birchak | May 2007 | B2 |
7258169 | Fripp | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7290606 | Coronado | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7318471 | Rodney | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322409 | Wittle | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322416 | Burris | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7350577 | Howard | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7363967 | Burris | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7404416 | Schultz | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405998 | Webb | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409999 | Henriksen | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413010 | Blauch | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419002 | Oybevik | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426962 | Moen | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440283 | Rafie | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7455104 | Duhon | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7464609 | Fallet | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7468890 | Lin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469743 | Richards | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7520321 | Hiron | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7537056 | Macdougal | May 2009 | B2 |
7578343 | Augustine | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7621336 | Badalamenti | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7644773 | Richard | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7686078 | Khomynets | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7699102 | Storm | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708068 | Hailey, Jr. | May 2010 | B2 |
7780152 | Rao | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7814973 | Dusterhoft et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828067 | Scott et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7857050 | Zazovsky et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7882894 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7918272 | Gaudette et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8016030 | Prado Garcia | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8025103 | Wolinsky | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8083935 | Eia | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8127856 | Nish | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8191627 | Hamid | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8196665 | Wolinsky | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8235128 | Dykstra | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8261839 | Fripp | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272443 | Watson | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8276669 | Dykstra | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8302696 | Williams et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20020148607 | Pabst | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150483 | Ursan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030173086 | Howard | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040011561 | Hughes | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050110217 | Wood | May 2005 | A1 |
20050150657 | Howard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050173351 | Neofotistos | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050214147 | Schultz | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060076150 | Coronado | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060113089 | Henriksen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131033 | Bode | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185849 | Edwards | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070012454 | Ross | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028977 | Goulet | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045038 | Han | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070107719 | Blacker | May 2007 | A1 |
20070169942 | Loretz | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173397 | Hinman | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070193752 | Kim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070246225 | Hailey | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246407 | Richards | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256828 | Birchak | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080035330 | Richards | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041580 | Freyer | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041581 | Richards | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041582 | Saetre | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041588 | Richards | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080149323 | Omalley | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080169099 | Pensgaard | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080236839 | Oddie | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251255 | Forbes | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261295 | Butler | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080283238 | Richards | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080314578 | Jackson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314590 | Patel | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090000787 | Hill | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090008088 | Schultz | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090008090 | Schultz | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009297 | Shinohara | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009333 | Bhogal | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009336 | Ishikawa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009412 | Warther | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009437 | Hwang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009445 | Lee | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090009447 | Naka | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090020292 | Loretz | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090065197 | Eslinger | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078427 | Patel | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078428 | Ali | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090101342 | Gaudette | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101344 | Crow | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101352 | Coronado | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101354 | Holmes | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114395 | Holmes et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090120647 | Turick | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133869 | Clem | May 2009 | A1 |
20090151925 | Richards | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159282 | Webb | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090188661 | Bizon | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090205831 | Garcia et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090226301 | Priestman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090250224 | Wright et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090277639 | Schultz | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090277650 | Casciaro | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090301730 | Gweily | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100025045 | Lake | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100122804 | Yang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100181251 | Alspektor | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249723 | Fangrow, Jr. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100300568 | Faram | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110017458 | East | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110042091 | Dykstra | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110042092 | Fripp et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110042323 | Sullivan | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110079384 | Russell et at. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110139451 | McKeen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110139453 | Schultz | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110186300 | Dykstra et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110198097 | Moen | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110203671 | Doig | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214871 | Dykstra | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110214876 | Dykstra | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110266001 | Dykstra | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110297384 | Fripp et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110297385 | Dykstra | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120048563 | Holderman | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120060624 | Dykstra | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061088 | Dykstra | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120111577 | Dykstra | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125120 | Dykstra | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125626 | Constantine | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138304 | Dykstra | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120145385 | Lopez | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120152527 | Dykstra | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120181037 | Holderman | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120211243 | Dykstra | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120234557 | Dykstra | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120255351 | Dykstra | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120255739 | Fripp | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120255740 | Fripp | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120305243 | Hallundbaek et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130020088 | Dyer et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130075107 | Dykstra | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0834342 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1672167 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1857633 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1857633 | Nov 2007 | EP |
PCTUS08075668 | Sep 2008 | USA |
PCTUS09046363 | Jun 2009 | USA |
PCTUS09046404 | Jun 2009 | USA |
0063530 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0214647 | Feb 2002 | WO |
03062597 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004012040 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004081335 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2006015277 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2008024645 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2009081088 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009052076 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009052103 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009052149 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009088292 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009088293 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2009088624 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Tesar, “Fluidic Valves for Variable-Configuration Gas Treatment, Chemical Engineering Research and Design”, 83 (A9), pp. 1111-1121, Jun. 27, 2005. |
“Fluidics”, Microsoft Encarta Online Encylopedia, copyright 1997-2009. |
Kirshner et al., “Design Theory of Fluidic Components”, 1975, Academic Press, New York. |
Kirshner, “Fluid Amplifiers”, 1966, McGraw-Hill, New York. |
Tesar, “New Ways of Fluid Flow Control in Automobiles: Experience with Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment Control”, Seoul 2000 FISITA World Automotive Congress, Jun. 12-15, 2000, F2000H192. |
Tesar, “Sampling by Fluidics and Microfluidics”, Acta Polytechnica vol. 42 No. 2/2002, Jun. 24, 2005. |
Angrist, “Fluid Control Device”, Scientific American Dec. 1964, pp. 80-88, Dec. 1, 1964. |
Freyer, “An Oil Selective Inflow Control System”, SPE 78272, Oct. 2002. |
“Apparatus and Method of Inducting Fluidic Oscillation in a Rotating Cleaning Nozzle,” ip.com, dated Apr. 24, 2007, 3 pages. |
Stephen L. Crow, Martin P. Coronado, Rustom K. Mody, “Means for Passive Inflow Control Upon Gas Breakthrough,” SPE 102208, 2006 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A., Sep. 24-27, 2006, 6 pages. |
Gebben, Vernon D., “Vortex Valve Performance Power Index,” NASA TM X-52257, May 1967, pp. 1-14 plus 2 cover pages and Figures 1-8, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. |
Haakh, DR.-ING. Frieder, “Vortex Chamber Diodes as Throttle Devices in Pipe Systems. Computation of Transient Flow,” Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2003, vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 53-59. |
Holmes, Allen B., et al., “A fluidic approach to the design of a mud pulser for bore-hole telemetry while drilling,” DRCMS Code: 7-36AA-7100, HDL Project: A54735, Aug. 1979, pp. 1,2,5,6,9-27, and 29-37, Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. |
Lee Precision Micro Hydraulics, Lee Restrictor Selector product brochure; Jan. 2011, 9 pages. |
The Lee Company Technical Center, “Technical Hydraulic Handbook,” 11th Edition, copyright 1971-2009, 7 pages Connecticut. |
Weatherford product brochure entitled, “Application Answers—Combating Coning by Creating Even Flow Distribution in Horizontal Sand-Control Completions,” 2005, 4 pages, Weatherford. |
J.D Willingham, H.C. TAN, L.R. Norman, “Perforation Friction Pressure of Fracturing Fluid Slurries,” SPE 25891, SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, Co., U.S.A., Apr. 12-14, 1993, 14 pages. |
Masahiro Takebayashi, Hiroshi Iwata, Akio Sakazume, Hiroaki Hata, “Discharge Characteristics of an Oil Feeder Pump Using Nozzle Type Fluidic Diodes for a Horizontal Compressor Depending on the Driving Speed,” International Compressor Engineering Conference, Paper 597, 1988, 9 pages. |
Flossert “Constant Flow Rate Product Brochure”, Dec. 2002, 1 page. |
Savkar, An Experimental Study of Switching in a Bistable Fluid Amplifier, University of Michigan, Dec 1966. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2012/032044, Mail Date Oct. 25, 2012, 9 pages |
Canadian Office Action, Application No. 2,737,998, Mail Date Jun. 21, 2013, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130092381 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12770568 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13441985 | US |