This patent disclosure relates generally to variable displacement hydraulic pumps and, more particularly to methods and apparatuses for controlling multiple variable displacement hydraulic pumps.
Variable displacement hydraulic pumps are used in a variety of applications. For example, hydraulic construction machines, earthworking machines, and the like, often use variable displacement hydraulic pumps to provide the pressurized hydraulic fluid flow required to perform desired work functions. Operation of the pumps can be subject to variations in pressure and flow output caused by variations in load requirements. It has long been desired to maintain the pressure output of the pumps in a consistent manner so that operation of the hydraulic systems is well behaved and predictable. Therefore, attempts have been made to monitor the pressure output of a pump, and control pump operation accordingly to compensate for changes in loading. The pressure output of a variable displacement hydraulic pump is typically adjusted by changing the angle of a swashplate of the pump which changes the displacement of the pump.
As the power requirements of the machines in which variable displacement hydraulic pumps increases, so does the hydraulic fluid power requirements. However, due to restrictions in the structure of variable displacement hydraulic pumps as well as the properties of the hydraulic fluid, the size of the pumps that can be used practically is limited. Thus, in applications where a large flow of pressurized hydraulic fluid is desired, two variable displacement pumps can be arranged with their discharge ports connected together. Since the pump discharge ports are connected, the two pumps are hydraulically interacting with each other. In particular, the discharge pressures of the two pumps are always the same. Consequently, with a given pump load flow, any change in either swashplate angle will affect the discharge pressure. If the swashplates of the two pumps are controlled independently by respective control valves with feedback of the swashplate positions and the pump discharge pressure, several closed loops are formed making the design of the control system significantly more complicated than for a single pump.
One issue with controlling two pumps with a connected discharge port can occur in circumstances where the parameters of the two pumps are different either due to manufacturing and assembly tolerances but the two controllers are identical or where the parameters of the two controllers are different. Under such circumstances, the swashplate angles for the two pumps will be different under steady state conditions. As a result, a positive feedback process in the control systems can lead to the positions of the swashplates being moved to opposite extremes. In particular, a pressure increase in the system can cause the controller of the first pump to move the pump swashplate into a position that decreases the displacement of the pump (i.e., de-stroke the swashplate). This decreases the pressure in the system. However, if the pressure decreases too much, the controller for the second pump may attempt to increase the pressure in the system by directing the swashplate of the second pump into a position that increases the displacement of the second pump (i.e., up-stroke the swashplate). If the pressure increases too far, the controller for the first pump will attempt to compensate by decreasing the pressure by again decreasing the displacement of the first pump. Again, if the reduction goes too far, the second controller will yet again increase the displacement of the second pump to increase the pressure in the system. This loop can continue until the swashplate of one of the pumps hits its extreme position, i.e. fully up-stroked or full de-stroked. When the swashplate is in such a position, the performance and stability of the hydraulic system can be significantly degraded.
Another issue with controlling two pumps with a connected discharge port can arise when trying to optimize the operating efficiency of the two pumps. With a given set of other working conditions, the efficiency of the two pumps depends on their displacement. Thus, optimizing the operating efficiency of the hydraulic system for a particular discharge pressure, involves selecting the most favorable combination of the displacements of the two pumps. However, since the discharge ports of the two pumps are connected, any change in the displacement of one pump will necessarily affect the other one. As a result, a system that controls the two pumps with the same command cannot optimize the efficiency of the two pumps.
The disclosure describes, in one aspect a method for controlling discharge pressure and pump displacement of a plurality of variable displacement hydraulic pumps having connected discharge ports with each pump including a swashplate and a control valve for controlling an angle of inclination of the swashplate. The method including the steps of determining a desired first pump displacement control law for a first pump and determining a desired second pump discharge pressure control law for a second pump. The first control law is used to determine a first intermediate control variable. The second control law is used to determine a second intermediate control variable. The control of the first and second pumps are combined using the first and second intermediate control variables. A desired first control valve setting for the control valve of the first pump is determined using the combined first and second intermediate control variables and the first control law. A desired second control valve setting for the control valve of the second pump is determined using the combined first and second intermediate control variables and the second control law.
In another aspect, the disclosure describe an apparatus for controlling discharge pressure and pump displacement of a plurality of variable displacement hydraulic pumps having connected discharge ports. The apparatus includes a first swashplate pivotably supported with respect to a first pump and a second swashplate pivotably supported with respect to a second pump. A first control valve controls an angle of inclination of the first swashplate and a second control valve controls an angle of inclination of the second swashplate. At least one controller is in communication with the first and second control valves. The controller is configured with a desired first pump displacement control law for the first pump and a desired second pump discharge pressure control law for a second pump. The controller is also configured to use the first control law to determine a first intermediate control variable and to use the second control law to determine a second intermediate control variable. The controller combines the control of the first and second pumps using the first and second intermediate control variables and determining a desired first control valve setting for the control valve of the first pump using the combined first and second intermediate control variables and the first control law and determines a desired second control valve setting for the control valve of the second pump using the combined first and second intermediate control variables and the second control law.
According to another aspect, the disclosure describes a hydraulic system for providing hydraulic power to a load. The system includes a first variable displacement hydraulic pump including a first swashplate pivotably supported with respect to the first pump and a first control valve for controlling an angle of inclination of the first swashplate. The first pump has a first discharge port out of which pressurized hydraulic fluid is discharged from the first pump. The system includes a second variable displacement hydraulic pump including a second swashplate pivotably supported with respect to the second pump and a second control valve for controlling an angle of inclination of the second swashplate. The second pump has a second discharge port out of which pressurized hydraulic fluid is discharged from the second pump and wherein the first and second discharge ports are connected. At least one controller is in communication with the first and second control valves. The controller is configured with a first desired pump displacement control law for the first pump and a second desired pump discharge pressure control law for a second pump and configured to use the first control law to determine a first intermediate control variable and to use the second control law to determine a second intermediate control variable. The controller combines the control of the first and second pumps using the first and second intermediate control variables. The controller determines a desired control valve setting for the control valve of the first pump using the combined first and second intermediate control variables and the first control law and determines a desired control valve setting for the control valve of the second pump using the combined first and second intermediate control variables and the second control law.
This disclosure relates to an apparatus and method for controlling a system of two or more variable displacement hydraulic pumps, hereinafter pumps, that have connected discharge ports for delivering pressurized hydraulic fluid to a load. With particular reference to
The first pump 102 illustrated in
When the cylinder block 108 is rotated relative to the valve plate 202, each piston 110 periodically passes over each of the intake and discharge ports 204, 206 of the valve plate 202. The angle of inclination a of the swashplate 104 causes the pistons 110 to undergo an oscillatory displacement in and out of the cylinder block 108, thus drawing hydraulic fluid into the intake port 204, which is a low pressure port, and discharging hydraulic fluid out of the discharge port 206, which is a high pressure port. The first pump 102 provides pressurized hydraulic fluid to the discharge port 206 of the valve plate 202 by means of a pump output port 314.
A system for delivering pressurized hydraulic fluid including first and second pumps 102, 103 that have discharge ports connected via line 316 is shown in
With each of the first and second pumps 102, 103, a discharge pressure feedback servo 308, in cooperation with a servo spring 310, operates to increase the angle of inclination α1, α2 of the respective swashplate 104, thus increasing the stroke of the pump 102. In the illustrated embodiment, the discharge pressure of each first and second pumps 102, 103 is fed directly back to the pressure feedback servo 308 via a respective feedback line 312. Additionally, with each pump, a control servo 314, receives pressurized fluid from the output port 306 of the control valve 302, and responsively operates to decrease the angle of inclination α1, α2 of the respective swashplate 104, thus decreasing the stroke of the pump 102, 103. In a known manner, the control servo 314 can be larger in size and capacity than the discharge pressure feedback servo 308 under some circumstances.
For determining various operating parameters of the first and second pumps 102, 103, assorted sensors may be provided. For example, a pump discharge pressure sensor 402 can be provided that is adapted to sense the output pressure of the hydraulic fluid from the first and second pumps 102, 103 as shown in
For controlling operation of the first and second pumps 102, 103, each can have a respective controller 408, 410 as shown in
As noted above, the first and second pumps 102, 103 in the illustrated system hydraulically interact with each other due to their discharge ports 206 being connected via line 316. In particular, the discharge pressure of the two pumps is always the same. Thus, with a given pump load flow, any change in the position of the swashplate 104 of either the first or the second pump 102, 103, will effect the discharge pressure. A complicated control system including several closed loops results when feedback of the pump discharge pressure and the swashplate positions is provided. A simplified control system can be provided by configuring the controller of one of the pumps with an appropriate pump discharge pressure control law and the controller of the other pump with an appropriate pump displacement control law.
Assuming that the first and second pumps 102, 103 are identical, the pump discharge pressure P and the displacement of the first and second pumps, i.e. their respective swashplate positions α1 and α2, can be expressed in Laplace domain using a singular perturbation method to linearize the system dynamics as:
Where QL(s) is the load flow rate of the two pumps; the overall control volume of the pump discharge port is V; cl is a overall leakage coefficient for the two pumps; the leakage coefficient of each of the control servos is ccl; the fluid bulk modulus is constant and denoted by β; the pump displacement coefficient is KD; Ac is the control servo actuator area; Lc is the distance from the center of the control servo actuator to the swashplate pivot point; kqp is the control valve flow gain coefficient linearized at a certain operating condition; c is the damping ratio for the swashplate; and x1 and x2 are the respective control valve spool 304 positions for the first and second pumps 102, 103 with zero set at null. Additionally, in Equations (1)-(3) where:
with ksprg being the servo spring rate; r being radius of the pump piston pitch circle; Lb being the distance from the feedback servo center to the swashplate pivot point; N being the number of pistons; and mp being the mass of piston assembly. Moreover, in Equations (1)-(3) where:
with Ab being the cross-sectional area of the control servo, n being the pump running speed, Ap being the piston cross-sectional area, and γ being the pressure carry over angle.
In order to control the pump discharge pressure P and the displacement of one of the pumps, e.g. α1, a MIMO (multiple input, multiple output) control design can be used such as shown diagrammatically in
In order to determine if the MIMO control system of
This transfer matrix can be diagonalized by left multiplication of a matrix using:
as:
This means the system control design of the two pump system can be performed in a SISO manner in terms of intermediate control variables
with a transformation of:
By decoupling the MIMO control system into SISO ones as shown above, the pump discharge pressure P and the swashplate position α1 can be essentially controlled independently with intermediate variables with the load pressure and load flow treated as the system disturbances. A flow diagram showing a method by which this can be accomplished in an exemplary embodiment involving the two pump configuration of
Thus, the control method of
The control method illustrated in
α1d(s)=α2(s)+Δαd (11)
With such a displacement control law, the desired swashplate position α1 of the first pump 102 is equal to the swashplate position α2 of the second pump 103 plus a fixed swashplate position difference, Δαd. If the fixed swashplate position difference Δαd is set to zero, then the control becomes, as a practical matter, pressure control with the displacement control law set as a displacement constraint of equal pump displacement.
While the disclosed control method and apparatus is described in connection with a two pump system for delivering pressurized hydraulic fluid, it is equally applicable to systems involving more than two pumps. For example, in a three pump system, a first pair of pumps is selected. Then, for that pair of pumps, one is controlled using a displacement control law and the other is controlled using a discharge pressure control law such as shown in
The control method and apparatus described herein allows hydraulic systems to utilize a combination of multiple pumps having different configurations (for example, pumps of different sizes) without adding control complexity and the added cost associated therewith. Moreover, the disclosed control method and apparatus enables a multiple pump system to be readily configured to optimize pump efficiency. In particular, controlling the pressure and displacement separately, provides a robust control system that is insensitive to system uncertainties by controlling the pressure and displacement respectively.
The disclosed control method and apparatus can be readily implemented in any hydraulic system involving two or more variable displacement hydraulic pumps. For example, variable displacement hydraulic pumps are often used to provide a supply of pressurized hydraulic fluid to various actuators for performing work functions. For example, work implements on earth-moving machines are typically powered by hydraulically actuated cylinders.
It will be appreciated that the foregoing description provides examples of the disclosed system and method. However, it is contemplated that other implementations of the disclosure may differ in detail from the foregoing examples. All references to the disclosure or examples thereof are intended to reference the particular example being discussed at that point and are not intended to imply any limitation as to the scope of the disclosure more generally. All language of distinction and disparagement with respect to certain features is intended to indicate a lack of preference for those features, but not to exclude such from the scope of the disclosure entirely unless otherwise indicated.
Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3941514 | Louis et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
RE30226 | Louis et al. | Mar 1980 | E |
4436487 | Purvis et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4809504 | Izumi et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5659485 | Lee | Aug 1997 | A |
6109030 | Geringer | Aug 2000 | A |
6374722 | Du et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375433 | Du et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6468046 | Du et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6623247 | Du | Sep 2003 | B2 |
20040115065 | Du et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040261407 | Du | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050022589 | Du | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050283299 | Du et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060095163 | Wear et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060162439 | Du | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070119161 | Du et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20090005914 | DeMarco et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1988112137 | May 1988 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120283882 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |