The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for controlling the current flow of at least one phase winding of a switched reluctance motor.
A switched reluctance machine (SRM) is generally a machine in which torque is produced by the tendency of its movable part to move into a position where the inductance of an excited winding of the machine is maximized. A conventional switched reluctance machine comprises a stator including stator poles and a rotor, comprising rotor poles, and coupled to a rotatable shaft co-axial with the principal axis of the stator. Associated with each stator pole is a wound coil of wire, e.g. a copper wire. The coils of the stator poles can be coupled together to form a multi-phase machine, e.g. a three phase machine. When a phase and thus the coils of its corresponding stator poles is energized current will flow through the coils of its stator poles and an electromagnetic force is produced between the energised stator poles of the phase and the rotor poles which will produce a torque. The torque is produced as a result of the rotor tendency to align its poles with the excited stator poles thus minimizing the reluctance of the so formed magnetic circuit.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,742,139 A a control circuit for a motor having at least two windings is used to optimize noise reduction by controlling the de-energization of each winding in a two-stage decay. The duration of the two-stage decay and particularly the first decaying current portion is controlled by a controller operatively coupled to a switch device. The current portion is varied between the various phases of the motor to provide noise reduction.
Further, U.S. Pat. No. 5,923,141 A discloses a current control circuit for a switched reluctance machine which provides corner shaping at the end of the active conduction period of a phase in which the phase winding is energized. The pulse width modulated firing pulses are gradually reduced in duty cycle so that the transition period between the current in the winding in the active period and the decay of the current in a ramp down period is smoothened to reduce the forces leading to vibration and acoustic noise.
Moreover, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,461,295 A an apparatus for controlling the current profile in a single of polyphase SRM during the active portion of a phase is disclosed.
Against this background, an objective of the present invention is to provide an improved method and apparatus for controlling the current flow of at least one phase winding of a switched reluctance motor.
This objective is achieved according to the invention by the claimed method and apparatus.
A method is provided for controlling the current flow of at least one phase winding of a switched reluctance motor during at least one dwell period of the motor, wherein the dwell period starts with a turn-on angle of the motor and ends with the turn-off angle of the motor,
wherein the dwell period is divided in a first subinterval comprising a first reference current, a second subinterval comprising a second reference current and a third subinterval comprising a third reference current,
wherein the flow of the first reference current is controlled based on at least one motor-efficiency parameter which depends directly or indirectly on the efficiency of the motor,
wherein the flow of the second reference current is controlled based on at least one torque-parameter which depends directly or indirectly on the torque of the motor to control the torque production of the motor, and/or
wherein the flow of the third reference current is controlled based on at least one noise-and/or-vibration-parameter which depends directly or indirectly on an electromagnetic force produced by the motor to reduce noise and/or vibration of the motor.
Further, an apparatus is provided for controlling the current flow of at least one phase winding of a switched reluctance motor during at least one dwell period of the motor, wherein the dwell period starts with a turn-on angle of the motor and ends with the turn-off angle of the motor, wherein the dwell period is divided in a first subinterval comprising a first reference current, a second subinterval comprising a second reference current and a third subinterval comprising a third reference current, comprising:
The concept underlying the invention entails that an dwell period of a switched reluctance motor is divided in three subintervals, which are controllable based on corresponding parameters independent of each other, so that the reference current of the first subinterval is controllable to increase the efficiency of the motor, the reference current of the second subinterval is controllable to improve torque generation while still permitting preferably a sufficient efficiency of the motor and the reference current of the third subinterval is controllable to improve noise, vibration and harshness characteristics.
Advantageous embodiments and developments of the invention emerge from the additional subordinate claims and from the description with reference to the drawing figures.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the at least one motor-efficiency parameter to control the flow of the first reference current to increase the motor efficiency during the first subinterval is a conduction loss of the at least one phase winding, for example a copper loss in case of a copper winding, a load of the motor and/or a working speed of the motor. Thus, over the first subinterval the motor efficiency can be optimized, as this is the interval when the rotor of the motor is moving from an un-aligned position or zero torque and starts to produce torque. As the torque is very low, the level of the reference current can be optimized such that coinduction losses, e.g. copper losses, of the at least one phase winding are kept low, while slowly energizing the phase. The first subinterval starts at a turn-on angle of the motor or zero torque and ends before the motor reaches a maximum predetermined torque.
In another embodiment of the invention, the least one torque-parameter to control the flow of the second reference current to control torque production of the motor is the torque of the motor, a tangential component of an electromagnetic force produced by the motor, a radial component of an electromagnetic force produced by the motor, a load of the motor and/or a working speed of the motor. Since the second subinterval is the interval at which the motor operates at its maximum torque capability, the flow of the second reference current is controlled to inject as much current as needed to develop or to provide the required torque or maximum torque of the motor. Based on the at least one torque parameter the flow of the second reference current can be controlled, in particular increased, to provide a corresponding maximum torque. The radial component of the electromagnetic force produced by the motor can be also increased. However, the radial component is still significantly lower than a maximum possible value which happens to be when the rotor pole of the motor is perfectly aligned with an exited stator pole of the motor.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, the at least one noise-and/or-vibration-parameter to control the flow of the third reference current to reduce noise and/or vibration of the motor is a tangential component of an electromagnetic force produced by the motor, a radial component of an electromagnetic force produced by the motor, a load of the motor and/or a working speed of the motor. The flow of the third reference current can be controlled so that the radial component is decreased or minimized while still developing the remaining portion of the torque which is needed to achieve a required average torque value. This has the advantage that noise, vibration and harshness can be reduced in the third subinterval while still torque is developed, and thus an average torque value larger than zero can be provided.
However, in an embodiment of the invention, the flow of the third reference current can be controlled so that the torque is reduced to a predetermined torque value while the radial component is minimized, wherein the predetermined torque value can be larger than zero or zero as well, depending on the function or use of the motor.
In another embodiment of the invention, the second reference current is a maximum current and the first reference current and the third reference current are equally great or different in size. As mentioned the second subinterval can be defined as the subinterval in which the motor can operate at maximum torque. Further, in contrast to a conventional one-state current function as will be described below, at least two or three different reference currents which are larger than zero can be applied to the subintervals of the dwell period of the motor.
According to another embodiment of the invention the third reference current is decreased by soft-chopping or hard chopping to zero or preferably a current value larger than zero. Soft-chopping of the flow of the third reference current has the advantage that the increased inductance can be exploited as depending on the working speed and load. Further a reduced phase voltage or zero voltage is allowed in the third subinterval which results in improvement in terms of the power factor.
In an embodiment of the invention the control means of the apparatus comprises a storing means in which a look-up table for a flow of the first, second and/or third reference current is stored dependent on the at least one motor-efficiency parameter, the at least one torque-parameter, and the at least one noise-and/or-vibration-parameter, respectively. The control means can control the reference current of the first, second and/or third subinterval based on the look-up table corresponding to the parameter or parameters sensed by the sensing means.
In a further embodiment of the invention, the control means of the apparatus comprises a calculation means to calculate a flow of the first, second and/or third reference current dependent on the at least one motor-efficiency parameter, the at least one torque-parameter, and the at least one noise-and/or-vibration-parameter, respectively. Thus alternatively or in addition to the look-up table or tables, the calculation means can calculate a flow of the reference current of the first, second and/or third subinterval or interpolate a flow of the reference current of the first, second and/or third subinterval based on a corresponding look-up table etc..
The present invention is explained below in greater detail with the aid of embodiments specified in the schematic figures in the drawings. These are as follows:
The accompanying drawings should convey further understanding of the embodiments of the invention. They illustrate embodiments of the invention and clarify the principles and concepts behind the invention in conjunction with the description. Other embodiments and many of the described advantages are apparent with respect to the drawings. The elements of the drawings are not necessarily illustrated true to scale in relation to each other.
In the figures in the drawing, the same elements, features and components, or those serving the same function and having the same effect, are provided with the same reference numerals in each case—unless otherwise specified.
In
The dwell period dwell period is the period between a turn-on angle θon and a turn-off angle θoff of the motor. The dwell angle θd is defined as turn-off angle θoff minus turn-on angle θon.
Further, the conduction period is the period between a turn-on angle θon and an extinguishing angle θe of the motor. The conduction angle θc is defined as extinguishing angle θe minus turn-on angle θon.
Furthermore, in
As mentioned before with respect to
In
One dwell period can be equal, greater or smaller as 1 stroke. This applies to all embodiments of the invention.
The conduction period is a bit longer than the dwell period between the turn-on angle θon and the turn-off angle θoff, since after the turn-off angle θoff there will still be current in the phase during the so-called de-fluxing period. During this period, the voltage is reversed and the current will decrease as fast as possible from its value in the “turn-off” point to zero.
The solid line indicates a standard function of a reference current applied to the motor depending on the angle of the motor and the corresponding stroke S of the motor. This standard function is referred to as one-state-current function.
On the other hand the dashed line indicates the new function of a reference current applied to the motor depending on the angle of the motor and the corresponding stroke S of the motor according to the invention. As shown in the example in
It is commonly known that switched reluctance motors (SRM) suffer from the problem of high radiated noise which results in bad noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) characteristics.
Due to the lack of magnets and thus the huge associated potentials, researchers are still struggling to improve these noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) properties, but often they end-up sacrificing the other key-performance indicators: efficiency, power factor, torque ripple.
According to the invention, an apparatus and method is therefore provided to simultaneously improve the noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) characteristic of such a switched reluctance motor (SRM) as well as its efficiency and the power factor.
In the conventional case as illustrated by the solid line in
In the new case there are three possible states, namely state-1, state-2 and state-3 as illustrated before, e.g. in
Over at least one such dwell period or conduction period, starting with the turn-on angle and ending with the turn-off angle, up to three different current references η1 to η3 can be applied. That means, the first, second and third reference current η1, η2 and η3 can be different in size, wherein the second reference current can be larger than the first and the third reference current. Further, the first and the third reference current can be either different in size or equally great.
Moreover, another three different degrees of freedom (DoFs) can be considered since each pulse and thus each subinterval δ1, δ2 and δ3 can have a different span over the stroke length and corresponding dwell period length. That means, the span over the stroke length of the first subinterval δ1, the span over the stroke length of the second subinterval δ2 and the span over the stroke length of the third subinterval δ2 can be different in size or equally great. The span over the second subinterval δ2 can be larger than the span over the first subinterval δ1 and the span over the third subinterval δ3. Further, the span over the first subinterval δ1 and the span over the third subinterval δ3 can be either different in size or equally great.
Over the first subinterval δ1 one can optimize the efficiency of the motor based on at least one motor-efficiency parameter, as this is the subinterval when the rotor is moving from un-aligned position, i.e. zero torque, and starts to produce torque. As the torque is very low, one can optimize the level of the current such that the copper losses are kept low, in case of copper windings of the motor, while slowly energizing the phase. Over this first subinterval δ1, similar to the tangential component, which is reflected in the torque, the radial ones or radial forces are also very small. As a motor-efficiency parameter to optimize the efficiency of the motor over the first subinterval δ1 a conduction loss of the winding(s), a working load of the motor or a working speed of the motor can be used. However, the invention is not restricted to the mentioned examples of motor-efficiency parameters.
One further possibility is to define different weights for the three objectives of the multi-objective optimization.
One such example was done with the current waveforms in following
1.) the reduction of current consumption thus the improvement of efficiency
2.) reduction of the RMS voltage thus the improvement of power factor and
3.) reduction of the radial force thus the improvement of NVH behavior.
One further example shows the current waveform in case of soft chopping where the reduction of the radial force had a higher weight in the overall objective functions, which means that the radial force will be drastically reduced at the expense of no improvement neither of efficiency nor that of the power factor. The current waveform is shown win
During the second subinterval δ2 the motor operates at its maximum torque capability, therefore it makes sense or it is preferred to inject as much current as needed to develop the required torque in the system. The radial component of electromagnetic force is also increasing but it is still significantly lower than the maximum possible value which happens to be when the rotor pole is perfectly aligned with the excited stator pole. Over the second subinterval δ2 one can optimize the torque production based on at least one torque-parameter. As a torque-parameter to optimize torque production the torque T of the motor, a tangential component of an electromagnetic force produced by the motor, a radial component of an electromagnetic force produced by the motor, a load of the motor or a working speed of the motor can be used. However, the invention is not restricted to the mentioned examples of torque-parameters.
Over the third subinterval δ3 the reference current is significantly decreased to a value which can be zero or larger than zero as shown in
In
For a comparison in
In
Besides the ideas aspects of the invention mentioned before regarding the multi-objective optimization, one more aspect of the invention related to
Further, the dashed (grey) line in
As shown in
As shown in
The third reference current η3 is therefore not necessarily zero but a value larger than zero and preferably a value larger than zero at which an optimum is reached between a minimum of the radial force and a certain value of torque required to achieve the required or predetermined average torque as illustrated in
As mentioned before, a comparable case is shown in
Based on this, one can denote the first subinterval δ1 as the efficiency control zone, the second subinterval δ2 as the torque production zone and ultimately the third subinterval δ3 as the radial force and thus the noise vibration and harshness (NVH) control zone.
It is well known that switched reluctance motors (SRM) have an inductance which is strongly nonlinear and it is increasing as the rotor pole is aligning with the excited stator pole. For the conventional one-state rectangular current control, this means that as the current approaches the turn-off point or turn-off angle, the phase will have to be longer supplied with voltage to maintain the same reference value.
On the other hand, the new control method, in particular in soft-chopping mode, exploits the increased inductance as depending on the working speed and load it allows the operation in the third subinterval δ3 with zero or reduced root mean square (rms) phase voltage thus bringing improvement in terms of power factor.
For a better understanding, comparative results are shown in following
The torque depending on the stroke S and thus the angle of the switched reluctance motor (SRM) of the conventional one-state rectangular hysteresis current control is indicated by a solid black line. Further, the flow of torque depending on the stroke S and thus the angle of the switched reluctance motor (SRM) of the new three-state current control with soft chopping of the current is indicated with a black dotted line and with hard chopping of the current with a grey solid line in
Further,
Unlike the
In
The radial force per phase of the motor depending on the stroke S and thus on the corresponding angle of the switched reluctance motor (SRM) of the conventional one-state rectangular hysteresis current control is indicated by a black solid line. Further, the flow of the radial force per phase of the motor depending on the stroke S and thus on the corresponding angle of the switched reluctance motor (SRM) of the new three-state current control with soft chopping of the current is indicated with a black dotted line and with hard chopping of the current with a grey solid line in
In this particular case shown in
Furthermore, for the case where the radial force had the highest weight in the objective function, an average value of 75.35N, 30.05N, 25.0N for the conventional rectangular hysteresis current control, three-state current control with soft chopping (SC) of the current (SC) and three-state current control with hard chopping (HC), respectively. It has to be stated that for the conventional case the current waveform was optimized for minimizing the torque ripple and so it can be concluded that minimizing the torque ripple leads to a higher radial force and thus to a worsening of the NVH behavior.
In comparison with the conventional rectangular case, when applying the new method and chopping the voltage in soft mode, the overall force value is lower as well as the individual harmonics amplitude thus an improved acoustic behavior can be provided. Moreover, for multi-objective optimizations with high weight of the radial force or for single-objective optimization with the radial force as objective, reduction of more than 50% of it can be achieved.
It was checked also with measurements where the sound power level (SPL) was measured for the case when the motor accelerates from 0 rpm to the maximum speed in a given time. Despite the fact that the three-state current control method with hard chopping exhibits the lowest average force, it is still inferior to its soft chopping counterpart as the amplitude of the higher order harmonics increases and ultimately the radiated noise. However this has nothing to do with the three-state method but rather with the way the chopping is done.
Finally, in
Furthermore, in
Moreover, in
At least but not last, it is expected that a combination of hard and soft-chopping (i.e. a hybrid chopping) add another degree of freedom in the optimization procedure of the best current waveform which improves the NVH-behavior. The hybrid chopping is realized by switching between hard and soft at a given or predetermined angular rotor position.
As for the efficiency, again, for this particular case, reported here, when optimizing using equal weights in the multi-objective weighted function the root mean square (rms) current decreases from 14.2 A in the conventional case to 13.4 A for the new method with a direct impact on the efficiency of +2.5%. Furthermore, lower root mean square (rms) current implicitly means lower conduction losses in the inverter thus increasing also its efficiency.
Finally, regarding the power factor, for the new method with the soft-chopping case, due to the operation in the third subinterval δ3 region and partially in the first subinterval δ1 region, where the voltage is zero, the root mean square (rms) phase voltage will decrease with round about 15% with a beneficial effect on the power factor. Moreover, as there is no chopping, the switching losses in inverter will also decrease, one again contributing beneficially to its efficiency.
In
The apparatus 1 for controlling the current flow of at least one phase winding of a switched reluctance motor 2 during at least one dwell period of the motor 2 comprises a first sensing means 3 for sensing the angle e of the motor and/or the corresponding stroke of the motor.
As mentioned before each dwell period of the motor 2 starting with a turn-on angle θon of the motor and ending with the turn-off angle θoff of the motor, is divided in the first subinterval δ2 in which the first reference current η1 is applied to the motor 2, the second subinterval δ2 in which the second reference current η2 is applied to the motor 2 and the third subinterval δ3 in which the third reference current η3 is applied to the motor 2.
Further, the apparatus 1 comprises means 4 for determining the first, second and third subinterval δ1, δ2 and δ3 based on the angle of the motor and/or the corresponding stroke S of the motor sensed by the first sensing means.
Moreover, the apparatus 1 comprises a second sensing means 5 for sensing at least one motor-efficiency parameter which depends directly or indirectly on the efficiency of the motor 2, at least one torque-parameter which depends directly or indirectly on the torque of the motor 2, and/or at least one noise-and/or-vibration-parameter which depends directly or indirectly on an electromagnetic force produced by the motor 2. Examples of such parameters have been mentioned before with respect to
Further, the apparatus 1 comprises control means 6 for controlling the flow of the first reference current η1 based on the at least one motor-efficiency parameter during the first subinterval δ1, the flow of the second reference current η2 based on the at least one torque-parameter during the second subinterval δ2, and/or the flow of the third reference current δ3 based on the least one noise-and/or-vibration-parameter during the third subinterval δ3.
In an embodiment of the invention the control means 6 comprises a storing means 7 in which a look-up table for a flow of the first, second and/or third reference current η1, η2, η3 is stored dependent on the at least one motor-efficiency parameter, the at least one torque-parameter, and the at least one noise-and/or-vibration-parameter, respectively.
In addition or alternatively the control means 6 can also comprises a calculation means 8 to calculate a flow of the first, second and/or third reference current η1, η2, η3 dependent on the at least one motor-efficiency parameter, the at least one torque-parameter, and the at least one noise-and/or-vibration-parameter, respectively. This has the advantage that less memory is required.
In
A computation logic provides three possible states of the current according to the invention, namely state-1, state-2 and state-3, as illustrated before, e.g. in
As mentioned before, a dwell period, i.e. the period between the turn-on angle θon and the turn-off angle θoff of the motor, is divided in three subintervals δ1, δ2 and δ3, wherein a first reference current η1 is applied in the first subinterval δ1 to at least one phase winding of the switched reluctance motor (SRM), a second reference current η2 is applied in the second subinterval δ2 to the at least one phase winding of the switched reluctance motor (SRM) and a third reference current η3 is applied in the third subinterval δ1 to the at least one phase winding of the switched reluctance motor (SRM). As illustrate in
As mentioned before during, e.g., over the second subinterval δ2 one can optimize the torque production based on at least one torque-parameter. As a torque-parameter to optimize torque production the torque T of the motor, a tangential component of an electromagnetic force produced by the motor, a radial component of an electromagnetic force produced by the motor, a load of the motor or a working speed of the motor can be used. However, the invention is not restricted to the mentioned examples of torque-parameters.
Although the present invention has been fully described above by means of preferred embodiments, it is not limited to the above, but may be modified in a number of ways. In particular, the embodiments of the invention described with respect to
1 apparatus
2 switched reluctance motor
3 first sensing means
4 means for determining the first, second and third subinterval
5 second sensing means
6 control means
7 storing means
8 calculation means
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17179850.7 | Jul 2017 | EP | regional |